Research Article | Open Access
Agnieszka Szuster-Ciesielska, Leszek Wawiórka, Dawid Krokowski, Nikodem Grankowski, Łukasz Jarosz, Urszula Lisiecka, Marek Tchórzewski, "Immunogenic Evaluation of Ribosomal P-Protein Antigen P0, P1, and P2 and Pentameric Protein Complex P0-(P1-P2)2 of Plasmodium falciparum in a Mouse Model", Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2019, Article ID 9264217, 19 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9264217
Immunogenic Evaluation of Ribosomal P-Protein Antigen P0, P1, and P2 and Pentameric Protein Complex P0-(P1-P2)2 of Plasmodium falciparum in a Mouse Model
Malaria remains one the most infectious and destructive protozoan diseases worldwide. Plasmodium falciparum, a protozoan parasite with a complex life cycle and high genetic variability responsible for the difficulties in vaccine development, is implicated in most malaria-related deaths. In the course of study, we prepared a set of antigens based on P-proteins from P. falciparum and determined their immunogenicity in an in vivo assay on a mouse model. The pentameric complex P0-(P1-P2)2 was prepared along with individual P1, P2, and P0 antigens. We determined the level of cellular- and humoral-type immunological response followed by development of specific immunological memory. We have shown that the number of Tc cells increased significantly after the first immunization with P2 and after the second immunization with P1 and P0-(P1-P2)2, which highly correlated with the number of Th1 cells. P0 appeared as a poor inducer of cellular response. After the third boost with P1, P2, or P0-(P1-P2)2, the initially high cellular response dropped to the control level accompanied by elevation of the number of activated Treg cells and a high level of suppressive TGF-β. Subsequently, the humoral response against the examined antigens was activated. Although the titers of specific IgG were increasing during the course of immunization for all antigens used, P2 and P0-(P1-P2)2 were found to be significantly stronger than P1 and P0. A positive correlation between the Th2 cell abundance and the level of IL-10 was observed exclusively after immunization with P0-(P1-P2)2. An in vitro exposure of spleen lymphocytes from the immunized mice especially to the P1, P2, and P0-(P1-P2)2 protein caused 2-3-fold higher cell proliferation than that in the case of lymphocytes from the nonimmunized animals, suggesting development of immune memory. Our results demonstrate for the first time that the native-like P-protein pentameric complex represents much stronger immune potential than individual P-antigens.
Despite numerous efforts, malaria is still one the most infectious and destructive protozoan diseases worldwide. According to the latest World Malaria Report (WHO, December 2017), in 2016, the estimated number of malaria cases reached 216 million with 5 million cases over the previous year, while the number of deaths was similar and reached approximately 445000. Among five protozoan species infecting humans, Plasmodium falciparum is responsible for most malaria-related deaths globally . In the past decades, important progress in understanding the malaria life cycle and, especially, the availability of effective antimalarial drugs has been made; however, due to the development of drug-resistant P. falciparum strains, vaccination represents the most promising strategy for disease control. The main difficulties in vaccine development include the genetic variability of P. falciparum, which is a parasite survival strategy for immune system evasion, and its complex life cycle [2–4]. This is the reason why the dozens of P. falciparum antigens tested so far have turned out to be ineffective. One of the most extensively studied antigen was P. falciparum circumsporozoite protein 1 (CSP1), which became a promising vaccine component . At present, the RTS,S/AS01 antigen, which targets the CSP1 of P. falciparum expressed at the preerythrocytic stage, was approved for use in Europe in 2015; however, the level of efficacy of RTS,S/AS01 is not sufficient to eliminate or eradicate malaria [5–8]. Besides improvement of the efficacy of the prototype vaccine, new approaches should also be developed. One of the promising antigens are Plasmodium sp. ribosomal P-proteins, which usually form an oligomeric complex with pentameric stoichiometry on the ribosome . Immunological response against its scaffolding component, the P0 protein (uL10 according to the new nomenclature) , was defined as part of Naturally Acquired Immunity (NAI) against malaria . The presence of specific anti-P0 antibodies in sera correlates with less severe clinical symptoms of malaria. Moreover, passive transfer of such antibodies or immunization with the P0 protein fragments conferred the malaria-specific protective properties in a murine model of the disease [12, 13]. In early trials, P0 was considered as a candidate for the vaccine development, but its immunogenicity turned out to be unsatisfactory. In general, the P0 protein belongs to a group of ribosomal proteins and is present within the cell as a component of the ribosomal particle, constituting a lateral ribosomal element, the so-called P-stalk structure . In eukaryotes, the stalk has pentameric organization, P0-(P1-P2)2, with two P1-P2 dimers anchored to the bipartite alpha-helical region on the P0, which docks the whole P-complex to the ribosomal particle [15, 16]. It is generally accepted that the main function of this ribosomal structure is the activation of translational GTPases during each step of protein synthesis . Multiplication of P-proteins, a phenomenon that is unique for ribosomal components, contributes to the fidelity of translation . However, additional so-called extraribosomal function was ascribed for the P-protein, showing that this ribosomal proteins can be associated with numerous metabolic processes nonrelated to the ribosome activity, such as tumorigenesis [19, 20], apoptosis [21, 22], autophagy , and pathogenesis of autoimmunological diseases [24–26]. Interestingly, P-proteins were also associated with several protozoan infections including Plasmodium sp. The P0 protein was found on the Plasmodium sp. cell wall , whereas the P2 protein was localized on the surface of infected red blood cells at an early stage of the parasite development , underscoring the fact that not only P0 but also another component of the P-complex might have a prominent role in development of immunity against the malaria pathogen.
In this study, we aimed to analyze the immunogenicity of a new-generation antigen, based on ribosomal P-proteins from Plasmodium falciparum, namely, pentameric P0-(P1-P2)2, and compare it with individual P0, P1, and P2. Using a heterologous expression system in E. coli, several antigens were prepared, such as individual P1, P2, and P0 proteins. A P0-(P1-P2)2 pentameric complex was also produced, assembled in bacterial cells, and purified in a form reflecting the native features of the P-protein complex . As a parasite-specific antigen, the Msp-1 protein was included as a reference. We evaluated the immune response against antigens in vivo with the mouse as an experimental model. Our results demonstrate for the first time that the native-like P-protein pentameric complex greatly enhances the immunogenic properties of the P-proteins and is critical for efficient development of cellular and humoral response as well as immunological memory.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Genetic Manipulations
DNA fragments carrying genes for the truncated form of P0 (amino acid residues 125-317) and the full length P1, P2, and Msp-119 proteins were synthesized based on the sequences deposited in the Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 genome database (http://www.genedb.org/Homepage/Pfalciparum) with accession numbers PF11_0313, PF11_0043, PFC0400w, and PF3D7 0930300 for the P0, P1, P2, and Msp-119 proteins, respectively. For all genetic manipulations, the DNA fragments containing the relevant genes were PCR amplified and introduced into a pT7-7 vector using specific restriction site EcoRI/BamHI. The DNA sequence encoding 6xHis-tag was introduced at the 5-end of the genes, which resulted in fusion of the tag at the N-terminal part of the protein. All genetic constructs were verified by sequencing. In the case of the pentameric P0-(P1-P2)2 complex, a tricistronic expression cassette was used together with the pGEX4T-1 expression vector, as described previously .
2.2. Protein Expression and Purification
All recombinant proteins were expressed or coexpressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3) cells (Stratagene), as described previously . In the case of the truncated form of P0125-317, further referred to as P0 or P1 recombinant proteins (which were present in cells as so-called inclusion bodies), the E. coli cells were disrupted by sonication, and the protein extract was solubilized in 8 M urea and purified by affinity chromatography on the Ni-NTA column (Sigma-Aldrich) in denaturing conditions, following the manufacturer’s procedure. The obtained fractions of the P0 and P1 proteins eluted from the Ni-NTA resin were subsequently refolded by dialysis into buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, and 10 mM MgCl2). The recombinant P2 protein as well as Msp-119 was purified by affinity chromatography on Ni-NTA resin (Sigma-Aldrich) in native conditions, according to the manufacturer’s procedure, and dialyzed into buffer A. The P-proteins constituting the P0(P1-P2) complex were coexpressed in E. coli in a soluble form, with truncated P0 (fragments 197-317) fused to the GST protein. The complex was purified by affinity chromatography on the GST-trap column (Sigma-Aldrich), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The GST was removed by thrombin treatment, and the integrity of the complex was examined with nondenaturing mass spectrometry, as described previously . The antigens were subjected to buffer exchange into buffer A immediately before formulation and mouse immunization.
2.3. Immunization of BALB/c Mice
Female 6-7 week-old BALB/c mice were purchased from Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences (Warsaw, Poland), and housed at the Department of Animal Physiology (approved animal laboratory) under stable climatic and dietary conditions. All procedures involving the animals and handling thereof were conducted in accordance with the European Community Council Directive of 24 November 1986 (86/609/EEC) and Polish legislation acts concerning animal experimentation. The experimental protocols and procedures described in the study were approved by the Ethics Committee at the Medical University of Lublin. The mice were used in this study after 1 week of acclimatization.
Groups of 18 female BALB/c mice were immunized i.m. with 50 μg of each protein antigen/mouse emulsified in complete Freund’s adjuvant on day 1 and boosted on days 21 and 42 with the same amount of the antigen in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant . The control group was administered only with the adjuvants. Blood and sera were collected on days 14, 35, and 56 from six mice. For determination of cytokines (IL-2, IL-10, IFN-γ, and TGF-β) and specific antibodies, serum samples from each group were pooled. Biological material was also collected from untreated animals.
2.4. Cytotoxicity Assay
Spleen lymphocytes of untreated mice were incubated at 37°C for 24-48 h with different concentrations of the antigens (10-500/1000 μg/ml). The toxicity of proteins was determined with the MTT assay according to the method described elsewhere . The data from four independent experiments, each with eight separate lymphocyte suspensions, are presented as a percentage of control cell viability. Based on the cytotoxicity assay results, a nontoxic dose of the antigens was applied to in vivo studies (see Figure S1 in the Supplementary Materials).
2.5. Proliferation Assay
Spleen lymphocytes were isolated two weeks after the last boost and incubated for 96 h with the protein that was used for immunization at 1 or 10 μg/ml, based on the cytotoxicity assay results. PHA (5 μg/ml) was used as a positive control. The toxicity of the proteins was determined with the BrdU (Roche Applied Science) proliferation assay. The stimulation index (defined as % viability of control cells lymphocytes of nonimmunized mice) of six individual lymphocyte suspensions performed in duplicate was calculated.
2.6. Flow Cytometry
Immunophenotypic analysis of peripheral blood cells was performed with an EPICS XL flow cytometer and the XL System II software (Beckman Coulter, USA). Double-color immunofluorescence assays were performed using a combination of PE- and FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse monoclonal antibodies: IgG2a (MCA1212PE) and IgG2b (MCA1125PE) as a negative control, CD4FITC (MCA1107F), CD8RPE (MCS1260PE), CD30RPE (MCA1691PE), CD94RPE (MCS2288PE), CD25RPE (MCA1260PE) from AbD Serotec, and FoxP3PE (eBioscience).
2.7. Quantification of Anti-P0, Anti-P1, Anti-P2, Anti-P0-(P1-P2)2, and Anti-Msp-119 Mouse Antibodies
MaxiSorp immunoplates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated with 100 μl/well 1 μg/ml of P0, P1, P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, or Msp-119 proteins dissolved in 0.05 M carbonate-bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) (Sigma) overnight at 4°C. To titrate the sera, depending on the antibody class and subclass, 1 : 2, 1 : 3, or 1 : 4 serial dilutions in PBS-T were assayed (IgG and IgG1—1 : 64/1 : 104976; IgG2a—1 : 27/1 : 13122). Appropriate dilutions of secondary anti-mouse antibodies conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (100 μl/well) were added: IgG (1 : 3000), IgM (Sigma), IgG1, and IgG2a (1 : 2000) (AbD Serotec). The serum dilution corresponding to a mean absorbance value of 0.1 was considered the end-point titer.
2.8. Cytokine Production by Lymphocytes
20 μl of appropriate P-proteins was added (final protein concentration of 1 or 10 μg/ml) to lymphocytes isolated from the untreated or immunized mouse spleen. The cells were incubated with the same protein that was used for immunization. Supernatants were collected after 24 h (TGF-β) or 72 h (IL-2, IL-10, and IFN-γ), and cytokines were assayed by ELISA with commercial kits (R&D Systems) and a microtiter plate reader (EMax, Molecular Devices Co.).
2.9. Statistical Analysis
The number of subjects included in this exploratory study was small. Significant findings, while useful for observation of trends in the data, are prone to error and must be confirmed in larger studies. Since the data were not normally distributed, nonparametric tests were used. For analysis of differences between two related samples, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for significance was used. All study groups were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Dunn multiple comparison test. Correlation analysis was performed using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. A value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistica software v12 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).
3.1. Preparation of Antigens
To compare the immunological response against various forms of P. falciparum P-antigens, a set of recombinant P-proteins, i.e., P1, P2, and P0, was prepared as 6xHis tagged forms, along with the Msp-119 protein as a control. All proteins were efficiently expressed using an E. coli heterologous system. The recombinant P0 and P1 proteins were located in an insoluble protein fraction as inclusion bodies (Figures 1(a) and 1(c)). Both the P0 and P1 proteins were purified using nickel-affinity chromatography in denaturing conditions; subsequently, the proteins were refolded using the buffer exchange procedure into buffer deprived of a denaturing agent. The P2 and Msp119 proteins were expressed in the soluble protein fraction (Figures 1(b) and 1(d)), and the purification was performed in native conditions. The pentameric complex of P-proteins, P0(P1-P2)2, was expressed in bacterial cells using a tricistronic expression cassette. All tested P1, P2, P0, and Msp119 proteins displayed a purity level exceeding 95%, as quantified by SDS-PAGE (Figure 1). The in vivo assembled complex was purified by single-step affinity chromatography, in native conditions, using glutathione-affinity chromatography . The complex was analyzed using the size-exclusion chromatography approach (SEC) and showed a single symmetrical peak indicating monodispersity of the sample; the SEC fractions used for subsequent immunization were analyzed with SDS-PAGE, and protein fraction displayed 95% purity (Figure S2).
3.2. T-cytotoxic Lymphocyte Response against Recombinant Ribosomal P. falciparum Antigens
The cellular response, which is critical in preerythrocytic stages of malaria infection and indispensable for elimination of intracellular liver-stage parasites, was quantified on the basis of changes in the number of T-cytotoxic effector cells (Tc, CD4-CD8+) in blood and spleen of immunized mice. Following the first immunization, only the P2 protein induced a significantly higher number () of blood Tc cells, which continuously decreased after the next immunizations (Figure 2(a)). Similar to the Msp-119, also the P1 protein and P0-(P1-P2)2 complex enhanced Tc proliferation after the second immunization; however, the action of Msp-119 was significantly () more effective (Figures 2(a) and 2(c)). The P0 and P1 antigens did not induce a significant increase in the Tc cell population. Irrespective of the proteins used, the blood CD8+ cell count decreased to a value comparable with the control after the last boosting. The number of splenic Tc cells in mice immunized with the P0, P1, and P2 proteins during threefold immunization remained unchanged and was comparable to that determined in adjuvant control animals. Two weeks after the last injection of P0-(P1-P2)2 and Msp-119, the percentage of Tc cells significantly declined () (Figure 2(b)).
3.3. T-helper 1 Lymphocytes Enhance Cellular Response
To determine whether cellular response induced with recombinant proteins is supported by T-helper 1 (Th1, CD4+CD94+) lymphocytes, we analyzed their number in mouse blood and spleens. A significant increment in the population of blood Th1 cells was noted after the first immunization with the P2 protein, which correlated (, ) with the number of Tc cells and persisted after the second boost. Th1 response of similar intensity was achieved after the second immunization with P1 and P0-(P1-P2)2 and the reference antigen Msp-119 (Figures 3(a) and 3(c)). Immunization with the P0 antigen had practically no impact on Th1 CD4+CD94+ abundance in any time during the course of the study. We noted a strong positive correlation between the number of Th1 and Tc lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of mice immunized with P1 (, ), P2 (, ), P0-(P1-P2)2 (, ), and Msp-119 (, ) (see Table S1 in Supplementary Materials). In comparison with blood, the percentage of spleen Th1 cells was 2.5-fold lower in both untreated and adjuvant control mice. During immunization with the P2 and P0-(P1-P2)2 proteins, we noted the biggest boost-dependent alteration in the frequency of Th1 cells (Figure 3(b)). Two weeks after the first and the second immunizations with the P2 protein, we observed significant ( compared with the adjuvant control) depletion in spleen Th1 cells, which statistically correlated with the increase in the number of blood lymphocytes (, ). Inversely, the first immunization with P0-(P1-P2)2 caused the highest frequency of Th1 cells among all proteins studied, which also negatively correlated with the numbers of blood Th1 (, ). Analysis of the frequencies of Th1 cells in peripheral blood and spleen revealed a significant negative correlation also in the case of P1 , and Msp-119 (, ).
3.4. Treg Lymphocytes Regulate Cellular Response: Link with TGF-β and IL-10
The initially high cellular response against all antigens tested (except P0) dropping to the control level after the third boost raised a question about the development of active immunological suppression. Therefore, we evaluated the number of CD4+CD25+ and CD4+FoxP3+ cells in both blood and spleen of immunized mice. A significant () increase in blood CD4+CD25+ cells was observed after the last immunization with all antigen tested, except the P0 protein (Figures 4(a) and 4(e)). The differences between the antigens used became more pronounced when specific CD4+FoxP3+ T cells were evaluated. Such cells, regarded as activated regulatory T cells, were significantly more abundant () after the third immunization with P1, P2, or P0-(P1-P2)2 but not with the P0 or Msp119 antigens (Figure 4(b)). While a negative correlation between CD4+CD25+ and Tc or Th1 cells was noted in almost all cases (see Table S2 in Supplementary Materials), statistically significant differences appeared during the comparison of the number of CD4+CD25+ and Th1 cells only after immunization with P2 (, ), P0-(P1-P2)2 (, ), and Msp-119 (, ). Similar correlations were observed between CD4+FoxP3+ and Tc or Th1 cells when P2 (, and , , respectively), P0-(P1-P2)2 (, and , , respectively), or Msp-119 (, and , , respectively) were used (see Table S2 in Supplementary Materials). During the immunization, the number of spleen CD4+CD25+ remained at the same level; however, we noted progressive activation of Treg that reached a maximum after the last boosting with all proteins (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)). Depending on the protein, these differences were statistically significant in the range of and . Treatment with the adjuvant alone only resulted in a slight increase in CD4+FoxP3+ cells in the spleen of the control mice. To confirm the link between the activation of regulatory cells and the decrease in the cellular response, we performed Spearman analysis. It showed a strong negative correlation between spleen CD4+FoxP3+ and Tc cells when the following antigens were used: P2 (, ), P0-(P1-P2)2 (, ), and Msp-119 (, ). In particular, a significant negative correlation between CD4+FoxP3+ and Th1 was noted only when P0-(P1-P2)2 was used (, ) (see Table S3 in Supplementary Materials).
Previous studies indicated that FoxP3+ Treg cells are derived from circulating CD4+CD25-FoxP3-T lymphocytes under stimulation with TGF-β and IL-10 . To confirm this finding, we determined the level of cytokines in mouse sera two weeks after each immunization. As expected, all proteins induced significantly high production of TGF-β (Figure 5(a)), except for P0, which positively correlated with the number of blood-derived CD4+CD25+ and CD4+FoxP3+ cells (see Table S4 in Supplementary Materials). The highest serum IL-10 concentrations appeared only when P0-(P1-P2)2 or Msp-119 were applied, reaching the maximum level after the last injection (Figure 5(b)), which was positively correlated with both the regulatory cell populations studied (see Table S4 in Supplementary Materials).
3.5. T-helper 2 Lymphocytes: Polarization of Immune Response
To assess whether our recombinant proteins are able to polarize immune response from the cellular to humoral direction, we determined the number of Th2 CD4+CD30+ cells in both blood and spleen of immunized mice (Figure 6). While the spleen Th2 population remained at the control level during all immunological studies, irrespective of the protein used (Figure 6(b)), we observed progressive expansion of blood Th2 cells. P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, and Msp-119 were the most effective proteins and stimulated significant proliferation of Th2 cells after the third injection (, in comparison with the first boost) (Figure 6(a)). Considering the Th1/Th2 ratio, we confirmed that initially P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, and Msp-119 efficiently stimulated cellular response , which was followed by enhancement of humoral response () (Figure 6(c)). Th2 cells are the main source of IL-10, and, as expected, we noted a strong positive correlation between the number of Th2 blood lymphocytes and the serum IL-10 level when P2 (, ), P0-(P1-P2)2 (, ), or Msp-119 (, ) were applied (see Table S5 in Supplementary Materials).
3.6. Production of Antibodies in response to Ribosomal P-protein Immunization
Since the humoral immune response is known to be protective against P. falciparum infection and clinical malaria, we evaluated the ability of recombinant P-proteins to induce a set of immunoglobulins, total IgG, as well as its subpopulations IgG1 and IgG2a. The titers of specific IgG antibodies were increased after the immunizations with all the antigens tested, but the dynamics of production thereof varied. P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, and Msp-119 induced high and statistically significant (, in comparison with the first boost) IgG production already after the second immunization, while the P1 antigen caused IgG production comparable with that induced by the P2 and P-complex only after the last immunization (Figure 7(a)). Interestingly, the P0 antigen did not induce IgG production significantly, indicating its low immunogenicity. Additionally, following the Spearman analysis, we found significant positive correlations between the total IgG level and the blood Th2 numbers when the following proteins were used: P2 (, ), P0-(P1-P2)2 (, ), and Msp-119 (, ) (see Table S6 in Supplementary Materials). Apart from its regulatory role, IL-10 supports humoral response by inducing lymphocyte B proliferation and production of immunoglobulins. In our experiments, statistically significant correlations between the total IgG and IL-10 levels were found in the case of proteins P1 (, ), P2 (, ), P0-(P1-P2)2 (, ), and Msp-119 (, ) (see Table S7 in Supplementary Materials). In particular, we noted a significant positive correlation between the IL-10 levels and the blood Th2 cell numbers after immunization of mice with P0-(P1-P2)2 (, ) and Msp-119 (, ) (see Table S7 in Supplementary Materials). The immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) isotype was predominant over IgG2a (with only one exception, as we added below) in a statistically significant manner, reflecting similar protein participation, as in the total IgG production (Figures 7(b) and 7(c)). Over the course of immunization, the level of IgG2a (an isotype promoted by Th1-like responses) increased more substantially than IgG1 (an isotype facilitated by Th2-like responses) in a nonsignificant manner only after the first immunization with the Msp-119 protein (Figure 8(a)), whereas all P-proteins gave a Th1 response () (Figures 8(a)–8(c)).
3.7. Evidence of Cellular Memory Development
To evaluate the immunological memory potential, we used in vitro exposure of spleen lymphocytes of immunized mice to recombinant proteins, measuring their ability to proliferate. We used a control mitogen, phytohemagglutinin (PHA), to check lymphocyte responsiveness. In comparison to the adjuvant-treated group, contact of lymphocytes isolated from threefold immunized animals with all recombinant proteins (except for P0) caused a two- to threefold (for P1, P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, and Msp-119) increase in proliferation, which was dependent on the concentration of the proteins (Figure 9(a)). In this experiment, there were no significant differences between the untreated and adjuvant-injected animals (Figures 9(b) and 9(c)).
Both Tc and Th1 cells are a source of IFN-γ, a cytokine with a critical role in immunity against Plasmodium sp. during liver-stage malaria. Although we did not detect IFN-γ in the sera of immunized mice, their spleen lymphocytes were able to produce significantly higher dose-dependent levels of this cytokine in response to the additional exposure to the antigen in vitro than the lymphocytes of the adjuvant and untreated animals (Figures 10(a)–10(c)). The data obtained in this experiment indicated that the P1 protein was the most effective, while P0-(P1-P2)2 and Msp-119 acted similarly, inducing ca. 40% lower level of IFN-γ in comparison with P1. The P0 antigen did not induce significant production of IFN-γ. IL-2 was also found to be an important cytokine for preerythrocytic immunity, providing signals enhancing Tc proliferation, preventing their apoptosis, and inducing differentiation of a memory subpopulation. We did not detect IL-2 in the sera of immunized mice; however, their spleen lymphocytes produced over a fivefold higher level of IL-2 after the restimulation, especially with the P0-(P1-P2)2 antigen, than the spleen leukocytes of the control mice. The analogous response for individual P-proteins and Msp-119 recall was less intensive (Figures 10(d)–10(f)), with the weakest IL-2 production after the P0 restimulation.
The complex life cycle of P. falciparum and the variety of its mechanisms allowing evasion of the host immune response determine the unique requirements for malaria vaccine development. The current efforts are mainly focused on the specific antigens recognized as active elements of Naturally Acquired Immunity (NAI) against malaria, which could be potentially used for effective immunization. Here, we presented a new class of antigens based on a conserved P. falciparum ribosomal P-protein—a complex of P0, P1, and P2 proteins (P0-(P1-P2)2), which display high immunogenicity.
Previous observations have shown that people resistant to malaria symptoms have a high titer of specific antibodies recognizing the ribosomal P0 protein [11, 34, 35]. Moreover, the passive transfer of the anti-P0 antibodies or immunization of mice with the P0 polypeptide fragments conferred malaria-specific protection . Additionally, the P2 protein, i.e., another component of the P-complex, was shown to be exported to the surface of infected red blood cells at an early parasite development stage [36, 37]. Specific anti-P2 IgG antibodies are able to cause parasite growth arrest at the onset of the nuclear division stage inside the erythrocyte, showing its unquestionable potential for vaccine development . In the course of studies on the structure and function of ribosomal P-proteins, we have developed a new class of antigens based on the pentameric ribosomal P-protein complex, which was shown to have native-like properties of the P-complex in terms of biophysical and structural aspects . Consequently, to acquire a complete view of the immunological properties of P-proteins, we have evaluated the immunogenic properties of individual components of the P-complex (namely, P0, P1, and P2 proteins) as well as a self-assembled P0(P1-P2)2 pentameric complex in a murine model. Additionally, we have used Msp11-19, a well-characterized malaria antigen, as a reference to compare quantitatively the level of immunogenicity.
Effective protection against P. falciparum involves both cellular and humoral immunities, with antibody targeting free parasites at the blood stage and a cellular response important mainly in preerythrocytic stages . The liver stage is the primary target for the vaccine-inducible T cell responses, because infected hepatocytes express a parasite’s antigens that can be recognized and eliminated by CD8+ cells at an early stage of malaria development . Interestingly, a significant increase in the population of Tc cells for P2, P0(P1-P2)2, and Msp11-19 antigens was observed with the most rapid response induced by the P2 antigen (I immunization). The P0 and P1 proteins induced poor cellular-type immunological response, regardless of the number of boosting events. It is well documented that Th1 CD4+CD94+ cells support generation of liver stage-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes  mainly through secretion of cytokines: IL-2, a multifunctional cytokine, which can promote both effector T and B cell responses  and IFN-γ mediating the cytotoxic activity of CD8+ [5, 42, 43]. Interestingly, we observed dynamic changes in the number of spleen Th1 cells in response to P0-(P1-P2)2, P2, and Msp11-19 but not to the P0 nor P1 proteins. However, the course of these changes differed: the P0-(P1-P2)2 protein complex and Msp11-19 induced significant growth of the Th1 population after the second immunization, while the P2 protein had the same effect after the first immunization. Moreover, we noted a negative correlation between the spleen and blood Th1 cell content suggesting redistribution of active lymphocytes. These results are in line with the notion that T cells specific for the blood stage of the Plasmodium sp. life cycle are induced primarily in the spleen . Importantly, the P0 antigen clearly represents the weakest cellular-type immunity inducing properties among the tested P antigens. At present, there is no information about the ability of infected hepatocytes to expose P-proteins of P. falciparum; hence, it is hard to estimate if the increased population of specific CD8+ cells that appeared in the mice after the immunization with our set of P-proteins could be efficient in eliminating infected hepatocytes.
The timing and intensity of different types of immune response development are crucial for the infection outcome. While an early proinflammatory response is required for reduction of parasite growth, anti-inflammatory mechanisms can prevent further organ damage . We observed that the initially high cellular response against P0-(P1-P2)2, P2, and Msp11-19 declined to the control level after the last immunization, which was negatively correlated with the increased number of Treg (CD4+CD25+) cells and with the concentrations of both main suppressor cytokines TGF-β and IL-10. What is important, these cytokines are required for generation of activated regulatory cells (FoxP3+), which are key players in controlling excessive immune response . In this context, both P0-(P1-P2)2 and Msp119 proteins emerged to be the most efficient antigens. In contrast, we saw no significant induction of cellular-type response after the P0 stimulation, and there were no clear signs of active cellular-type response quenching. Since CD8+ cells with the support of Th1 cells have been shown to participate in the liver stage of malaria, it is clear that both Th2 and B cells are important components of the immune response against the blood stage of Plasmodium sp. infection . Such sequentially biphasic CD4+ cell response appears during primary parasite infection . In our studies, this immunological polarization was clearly seen as an increased number of blood Th2 CD4+CD30+ cells, in respect of the Th1 CD4+CD94+ population, developed after the third immunization with P0-(P1-P2)2, P2, and Msp-119. It is tempting to speculate that the repeated immunizations with these antigens mimic immune response characteristic for the course of Plasmodium sp. infection. Supported by Th2 cells, generation of high antibody titers would prevent the invasion of erythrocytes by merozoites, enhance clearance of parasitized erythrocytes, or prevent their sequestration and thus the complications of malaria . Considering the P-proteins, it has been shown that the anti-P0 antibodies can protect against malaria infection in the murine model [12, 13]. However, it should be noted that the protective effect developed after numerous repeated immunizations, and the application of the recombinant P0 protein induced a polyreactive low-titer humoral response, which was not able to inhibit parasite growth efficiently . In line with those findings, we have shown that the P0 protein, in contrast to the other antigens tested, exhibits the weakest ability to induce antibody production. P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, and control Msp-119 induced the highest IgG production already after the second immunization, while P1, after the last, third immunization. In a previous work, antibodies against the conserved C-terminal region common to P0/P1/P2 were preferentially produced by immunization with a human pentameric P0-(P1-P2)2 complex . Moreover, monoclonal antibodies against C-terminal 16-mer peptide were the most effective inhibitor of P. falciparum invasion into erythrocytes . The IgG1 and IgG2 isotypes in mice represent either Th2- or Th1-biased IgG isotypes, respectively, and the IgG1/IgG2 ratio is often used to evaluate the relative immune bias . As in the case of Msp-119, we detected that, after the second immunization, all P-antigens induced production of cytophilic IgG1 immunoglobulins, reflecting the Th2 response. Importantly, a strict positive correlation between the abundance of Th2 cells and the level of IL-10 (a cytokine supporting humoral-type response) was observed after the immunization with P0-(P1-P2)2 exclusively. This represents a very interesting finding, because cytophilic antiparasite immunoglobulins (those from the IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses) predominate in sera of infected people and often correlate with protection against malaria [53, 54]. We also obtained indirect evidence that immunization with the P-antigens elicited specific cellular-type immunological memory. An in vitro restimulation of spleen lymphocytes from the immunized mice with recombinant proteins caused their two- to threefold proliferation increase in the case of P1, P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, and Msp-119. Again, P0-immunized spleen lymphocytes did not respond to the restimulation. Moreover, P1, P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, and Msp-119, but not P0, induced production of high levels of IFN-γ (activating the cellular response indispensable for parasite elimination at the preerythrocytic stage), whereas only P1, P0-(P1-P2)2, and Msp-119 induced IL-2 production (preventing Tc apoptosis, inducing the differentiation of memory subpopulation, and promoting effector T cell response) . Consequently, the general picture emerging from our experiments shows that the pentameric form of the P-proteins, i.e., P0-(P1-P2)2, is a much stronger immunogen than the P0 protein alone, which has been frequently used as a primary antigen so far. In our experimental system, the P0 induced poor response at both the cellular and humoral levels. The possible explanation of such poor P0 immunogenicity observed in several reports could be related to the fact that the native molecular properties of the P0 protein were not taken into account. It is well documented that the P-proteins are present in eukaryotes as a component of the pentameric P0-(P1-P2)2 complex, the so-called ribosomal stalk complex on the 60S ribosomal subunit, conferring the functionality for the ribosomal particle [9, 15]. It has been shown that individual P-proteins strongly stimulate each other in acquisition of the native structure ; hence, their epitope presentation is critically dependent on the cooperative folding of all stalk components. Therefore, it seems rational that P0 alone does not acquire its native state, and immunization with a misfolded antigen can explain the low titer and the high level of polyreactivity of the specific anti-P0 antibodies observed previously . Accordingly, in our studies, the immunization with P0 did not induce cellular-type immunity significantly and the humoral-type immunity was the weakest among the other P antigens tested. Additionally, contrary to P1, P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, and Msp-119, the immunological response against P0 in the course of the immunizations did not follow the classical polarization from the cellular toward humoral type, and the P0 protein turned out to be a much weaker immunogen than P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, or even P1. Thus, the general immunogenic properties of P2 and especially the P0-(P1-P2)2 complex are comparable to the Msp-119 level, which was used as a reference antigen in our experimental set-up. Further studies are required to check whether the specific anti-P0-(P1-P2)2 and anti-P2 immunological response is sufficient for inhibition of parasite growth and, consequently, prevents Plasmodium sp. infection.
Here, we presented a new class of antigens based on P. falciparum ribosomal P-proteins, P0, P1, P2, and their pentameric complex P0-(P1-P2)2. We found that these antigens induced efficient immune response in mice according to the following scenarios: (i) cellular response (which is critical in preerythrocytic stages of malaria and indispensable for elimination of intracellular liver-stage parasites), (ii) suppression of cellular response followed by polarization of immune response into the humoral type and production of specific antibodies (which play an important role in host defense and correlate with less severe clinical symptoms of malaria), and (iii) presence of immune memory. Our studies demonstrate for the first time that the recombinant P. falciparum ribosomal P-protein complex represents the most promising candidate for future development of a vaccine based on ribosomal P-proteins.
The data underlying the findings of this study are included within the article and the supplementary information file.
Conflicts of Interest
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.
This work was supported by grant N302 061034 from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland.
Figure S1: cytotoxicity of recombinant ribosomal P-protein antigens. The viability of mouse spleen lymphocytes treated for 24-48 h with different concentrations of P0 (A), P1 (B), P2 (C), P0-(P1-P2)2 (D), and Msp-119 (E) was determined with the MTT assay. The results are expressed as the of three independent experiments, each with eight separate cultures. Significantly different from the 24 h incubation time, (Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test). Figure S2: size-exclusion chromatography of the pentameric P-protein complex. Size-exclusion chromatography was performed using an analytical gel filtration column; the complex was eluted as a single symmetrical peak. Insert: SDS-PAGE analysis of protein fraction isolated from size-exclusion chromatography. Table S1: Th1 lymphocytes support cellular immune response. The Spearman correlation between the number of the Th1 and Tc lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of mice immunized with the P0, P1, P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, and MSP-119 proteins and in the adjuvant control mice as well as the untreated control mice. Each group consisted of eighteen mice. Values of were considered significant. Table S2: regulation of cellular response (blood lymphocytes). The Spearman correlation between the numbers of CD4+CD25+ or CD4+FoxP3+ versus Tc and Th1 lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of mice immunized with the P0, P1, P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, and Msp-119 proteins and in the adjuvant control mice as well as the untreated control mice. Correlations were calculated in each study group with eighteen mice. Values of were considered significant. Table S3: regulation of cellular response (spleen lymphocytes). The Spearman correlation between the numbers of CD4+FoxP3+ versus Tc and Th1 lymphocytes in cells isolated from the spleen of mice immunized with the P0, P1, P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, and Msp-119 proteins and in the adjuvant control mice. Correlations were calculated in each study group with eighteen mice. Values of were considered significant. Table S4: interplay between regulatory blood lymphocytes and TGF-β or IL-10. The Spearman correlation between the numbers of serum TGF-β or IL-10 and CD4+CD25+ or CD4+FoxP3+ lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of mice immunized with the P0, P1, P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, and Msp-119 proteins and in the adjuvant control mice. Correlations were calculated in each study group with eighteen mice. Values of were considered significant. The concentrations of circulating IL-10 levels in mice immunized with the P0 protein were below the detection threshold; therefore, calculation of Spearman correlations was not possible. Table S5: production of IL-10 is associated with increased Th2 lymphocyte numbers. The Spearman correlation between the numbers of serum IL-10 and Th2 (CD4+CD30+) lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of mice immunized with the P0, P1, P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, and Msp-119 proteins and in the adjuvant as well as the untreated control mice. Correlations were calculated in each study group with eighteen mice. Values of were considered significant. The concentrations of circulating IL-10 levels in mice immunized with the P0 protein were below the detection threshold; therefore, calculation of Spearman correlations was not possible. Table S6: humoral immune response support. The Spearman correlation between the IgG levels and the abundance of Th2 lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of mice immunized with the P0, P1, P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, and Msp-119 proteins. For IgG determination, sera in each mouse group were pooled (). Values of were considered significant. Table S7: IL-10 promotes humoral response. The Spearman correlation between IgG levels versus IL-10 serum concentrations and Th2 lymphocyte numbers in the peripheral blood of mice immunized with the P0, P1, P2, P0-(P1-P2)2, and MSP-119 proteins and in the adjuvant control mice as well as the untreated control mice. For measurements of both IgG and IL-10, sera in each mice group were pooled (). P0 did not induce detectable production of serum IL-10. Values of were considered significant. (Supplementary Materials)
- K. Katsuno, J. N. Burrows, K. Duncan et al., “Hit and lead criteria in drug discovery for infectious diseases of the developing world,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 751–758, 2015.
- K. Deroost, T. T. Pham, G. Opdenakker, and P. E. Van den Steen, “The immunological balance between host and parasite in malaria,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 208–257, 2016.
- A. Miles, Z. Iqbal, P. Vauterin et al., “Indels, structural variation, and recombination drive genomic diversity in Plasmodium falciparum,” Genome Research, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1288–1299, 2016.
- M. R. M. A. Razak, U. R. Sastu, N. A. Norahmad et al., “Genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum populations in malaria declining areas of Sabah, East Malaysia,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 3, article e0152415, 2016.
- E. M. Riley and V. A. Stewart, “Immune mechanisms in malaria: new insights in vaccine development,” Nature Medicine, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 168–178, 2013.
- R. Gosling and L. von Seidlein, “The future of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine: an alternative development plan,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 13, no. 4, article e1001994, 2016.
- RTS,S Clinical Trials Partnership, “Efficacy and safety of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine with or without a booster dose in infants and children in Africa: final results of a phase 3, individually randomised, controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 386, no. 9988, pp. 31–45, 2015.
- M. A. Penny, R. Verity, C. A. Bever et al., “Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine: a systematic comparison of predictions from four mathematical models,” The Lancet, vol. 387, no. 10016, pp. 367–375, 2016.
- P. Grela, D. Krokowski, Y. Gordiyenko et al., “Biophysical properties of the eukaryotic ribosomal stalk,” Biochemistry, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 924–933, 2010.
- N. Ban, R. Beckmann, J. H. Cate et al., “A new system for naming ribosomal proteins,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 24, pp. 165–169, 2014.
- A. Goswami, S. Chatterjee, and S. Sharma, “Cloning of a ribosomal phosphoprotein P0 gene homologue from Plasmodium falciparum,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 117–120, 1996.
- S. Chatterjee, S. Singh, R. Sohoni et al., “Antibodies against ribosomal phosphoprotein P0 of Plasmodium falciparum protect mice against challenge with Plasmodium yoelii,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 4312–4318, 2000.
- K. Rajeshwari, K. Patel, S. Nambeesan et al., “The P domain of the P0 protein of Plasmodium falciparum protects against challenge with malaria parasites,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 5515–5521, 2004.
- M. Tchorzewski, “The acidic ribosomal P proteins,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 911–915, 2002.
- D. Krokowski, A. Boguszewska, D. Abramczyk, A. Liljas, M. Tchorzewski, and N. Grankowski, “Yeast ribosomal P0 protein has two separate binding sites for P1/P2 proteins,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 386–400, 2006.
- A. Hagiya, T. Naganuma, Y. Maki et al., “A mode of assembly of P0, P1, and P2 proteins at the GTPase-associated center in animal ribosome: in vitro analyses with P0 truncation mutants,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 47, pp. 39193–39199, 2005.
- C. Maracci and M. V. Rodnina, “Review: translational GTPases,” Biopolymers, vol. 105, no. 8, pp. 463–475, 2016.
- L. Wawiorka, E. Molestak, M. Szajwaj et al., “Multiplication of ribosomal P-stalk proteins contributes to the fidelity of translation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 37, no. 17, 2017.
- A. Artero-Castro, J. Castellvi, A. Garcia, J. Hernandez, S. R. y. Cajal, and M. E. Lleonart, “Expression of the ribosomal proteins Rplp0, Rplp1, and Rplp2 in gynecologic tumors,” Human Pathology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 194–203, 2011.
- T. W. Chang, C. C. Chen, K. Y. Chen, J. H. Su, J. H. Chang, and M. C. Chang, “Ribosomal phosphoprotein P0 interacts with GCIP and overexpression of P0 is associated with cellular proliferation in breast and liver carcinoma cells,” Oncogene, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 332–338, 2008.
- A. Teller, D. Jechorek, R. Hartig et al., “Dysregulation of apoptotic signaling pathways by interaction of RPLP0 and cathepsin X/Z in gastric cancer,” Pathology, Research and Practice, vol. 211, no. 1, pp. 62–70, 2015.
- X. Yuan, Y. Kuramitsu, H. Furumoto et al., “Nuclear protein profiling of Jurkat cells during heat stress-induced apoptosis by 2-DE and MS/MS,” Electrophoresis, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 2018–2026, 2007.
- A. Artero-Castro, M. Perez-Alea, A. Feliciano et al., “Disruption of the ribosomal P complex leads to stress-induced autophagy,” Autophagy, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1499–1519, 2015.
- B.-N. Pham, M. Rudic, D. Bouccara et al., “Antibodies to myelin protein zero (P0) protein as markers of auto-immune inner ear diseases,” Autoimmunity, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 202–207, 2007.
- A. L. Calich, V. S. T. Viana, E. Cancado et al., “Anti-ribosomal P protein: a novel antibody in autoimmune hepatitis,” Liver International, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 909–913, 2013.
- S. Zampieri, W. Degen, A. Ghiradello, A. Doria, and W. van Venrooij, “Dephosphorylation of autoantigenic ribosomal P proteins during Fas-L induced apoptosis: a possible trigger for the development of the autoimmune response in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 72–76, 2001.
- S. Singh, A. Sehgal, S. Waghmare, T. Chakraborty, A. Goswami, and S. Sharma, “Surface expression of the conserved ribosomal protein P0 on parasite and other cells,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 121–124, 2002.
- R. Sudarsan, R. K. Chopra, M. A. Khan, and S. Sharma, “Ribosomal protein P2 localizes to the parasite zoite-surface and is a target for invasion inhibitory antibodies in toxoplasma gondii and Plasmodium falciparum,” Parasitology International, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 43–49, 2015.
- L. Wawiorka, D. Krokowski, Y. Gordiyenko et al., “In vivo formation of Plasmodium falciparum ribosomal stalk - a unique mode of assembly without stable heterodimeric intermediates,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, vol. 1850, no. 1, pp. 150–158, 2015.
- M. Tchorzewski, A. Boguszewska, D. Abramczyk, and N. Grankowski, “Overexpression inEscherichia coli,purification, and characterization of recombinant 60S ribosomal acidic proteins fromSaccharomyces cerevisiae,” Protein Expression and Purification, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 40–47, 1999.
- N. S. Outchkourov, W. Roeffen, A. Kaan et al., “Correctly folded Pfs48/45 protein of Plasmodium falciparum elicits malaria transmission-blocking immunity in mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 11, pp. 4301–4305, 2008.
- T. Mosmann, “Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 65, no. 1-2, pp. 55–63, 1983.
- A. El Andaloussi and M. S. Lesniak, “An increase in CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes of human glioblastoma multiforme,” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 234–243, 2006.
- C. A. Lobo, S. K. Kar, B. Ravindran, L. Kabilan, and S. Sharma, “Novel proteins of Plasmodium falciparum identified by differential immunoscreening using immune and patient sera,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 651–656, 1994.
- I. Malhotra, P. Mungai, E. Muchiri et al., “Distinct Th1- and Th2-type prenatal cytokine responses to Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte invasion ligands,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 3462–3470, 2005.
- S. Das, R. Sudarsan, S. Sivakami, and S. Sharma, “Erythrocytic stage-dependent regulation of oligomerization of Plasmodium ribosomal protein P2,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 49, pp. 41499–41513, 2012.
- S. Das, H. Basu, R. Korde, R. Tewari, and S. Sharma, “Arrest of nuclear division in Plasmodium through blockage of erythrocyte surface exposed ribosomal protein P2,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 8, no. 8, article e1002858, 2012.
- A. A. Holder, “Malaria vaccines: where next?” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 5, no. 10, article e1000638, 2009.
- M. G. Overstreet, I. A. Cockburn, Y. C. Chen, and F. Zavala, “Protective CD8+ T cells against Plasmodium liver stages: immunobiology of an ‘unnatural’ immune response,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 225, no. 1, pp. 272–283, 2008.
- N. Villarino and N. W. Schmidt, “CD8+ T cell responses to Plasmodium and intracellular parasites,” Current Immunology Reviews, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 169–178, 2013.
- J. M. Lumsden, R. J. Schwenk, L. E. Rein et al., “Protective immunity induced with the RTS,S/AS vaccine is associated with IL-2 and TNF-α producing effector and central memory CD4+ T cells,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 7, article e20775, 2011.
- J. C. R. Hafalla, I. A. Cockburn, and F. Zavala, “Protective and pathogenic roles of CD8+ T cells during malaria infection,” Parasite Immunology, vol. 28, no. 1-2, pp. 15–24, 2006.
- S. W. Tse, A. J. Radtke, and F. Zavala, “Induction and maintenance of protective CD8+ T cells against malaria liver stages: implications for vaccine development,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 106, Supplement 1, pp. 172–178, 2011.
- C. R. Engwerda, L. Beattie, and F. H. Amante, “The importance of the spleen in malaria,” Trends in Parasitology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 75–80, 2005.
- R. M. Goncalves, K. C. Salmazi, B. A. Santos et al., “CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, dendritic cells, and circulating cytokines in uncomplicated malaria: do different parasite species elicit similar host responses?” Infection and Immunity, vol. 78, no. 11, pp. 4763–4772, 2010.
- A. Scholzen, D. Mittag, S. J. Rogerson, B. M. Cooke, and M. Plebanski, “Plasmodium falciparum–mediated induction of human CD25hiFoxp3hi CD4 T cells is independent of direct TCR stimulation and requires IL-2, IL-10 and TGFβ,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 5, no. 8, article e1000543, 2009.
- T. Imai, H. Ishida, K. Suzue et al., “Cytotoxic activities of CD8+ T cells collaborate with macrophages to protect against blood-stage murine malaria,” Elife, vol. 4, 2015.
- D. Perez-Mazliah and J. Langhorne, “CD4 T-cell subsets in malaria: TH1/TH2 revisited,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 5, p. 671, 2015.
- D. Websterand and A. V. Hill, “Progress with new malaria vaccines,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 81, pp. 902–909, 2003.
- S. Pathak, K. Rajeshwari, S. Garg et al., “Plasmodium riboprotein PfP0 induces a deviant humoral immune response in Balb/c mice,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2012, Article ID 695843, 11 pages, 2012.
- H. Sato, M. Onozuka, A. Hagiya, S. Hoshino, I. Narita, and T. Uchiumi, “Characterization of anti-P monoclonal antibodies directed against the ribosomal protein-RNA complex antigen and produced using Murphy Roths large autoimmune-prone mice,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 179, no. 2, pp. 236–244, 2015.
- R. Kumar, G. Ledet, R. Graves et al., “Potent functional immunogenicity of Plasmodium falciparum transmission-blocking antigen (Pfs25) delivered with nanoemulsion and porous polymeric nanoparticles,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 3827–3836, 2015.
- F. H. Osier, G. Feng, M. J. Boyle et al., “Opsonic phagocytosis of Plasmodium falciparummerozoites: mechanism in human immunity and a correlate of protection against malaria,” BMC Medicine, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 108, 2014.
- G. S. Noland, P. Jansen, J. M. Vulule et al., “Effect of transmission intensity and age on subclass antibody responses to Plasmodium falciparum pre-erythrocytic and blood-stage antigens,” Acta Tropica, vol. 142, pp. 47–56, 2015.
- D. Krokowski, M. Tchorzewski, A. Boguszewska, and N. Grankowski, “Acquisition of a stable structure by yeast ribosomal P0 protein requires binding of P1A-P2B complex: in vitro formation of the stalk structure,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, vol. 1724, no. 1-2, pp. 59–70, 2005.
Copyright © 2019 Agnieszka Szuster-Ciesielska et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.