Journal of Immunology Research

Journal of Immunology Research / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 6629824 |

Yesenia Osorio-Aguilar, Maria Cristina Gonzalez-Vazquez, Patricia Lozano-Zarain, Ygnacio Martinez-Laguna, Alejandro Carabarin-Lima, Rosa del Carmen Rocha-Gracia, "Cloning and Characterization of Immunological Properties of Haemophilus influenzae Enolase", Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2021, Article ID 6629824, 14 pages, 2021.

Cloning and Characterization of Immunological Properties of Haemophilus influenzae Enolase

Academic Editor: Enrique Ortega
Received29 Dec 2020
Revised19 May 2021
Accepted04 Jun 2021
Published17 Jun 2021


Haemophilus influenzae is a common organism of the human upper respiratory tract; this bacterium is responsible of a wide spectrum for respiratory infections and can generate invasive diseases such as meningitis and septicemia. These infections are associated with H. influenzae encapsulated serotype b. However, the incidence of invasive disease caused by nontypeable H. influenzae (NTHi) has increased in the post-H. influenzae serotype b (Hib) vaccine era. Currently, an effective vaccine against NTHi is not available; due to this, it is important to find an antigen capable to confer protection against NTHi infection. In this study, 10 linear B cell epitopes and 13 CTL epitopes and a putative plasminogen-binding motif (252FYNKENGMY260) and the presence of enolase on the surface of different strains of H. influenzae were identified in the enolase sequence of H. influenzae. Both in silico and experimental results showed that recombinant enolase from H. influenzae is immunogenic that could induce a humoral immune response; this was observed mediating the generation of specific polyclonal antibodies anti-rNTHiENO that recognize typeable and nontypeable H. influenzae strains. The immunogenic properties and the superficial localization of enolase in H. influenzae, important characteristics to be considered as a new candidate for the development of a vaccine, were demonstrated.

1. Introduction

Haemophilus influenzae is a microorganism that commonly colonizes the upper respiratory tract of both children and adults [1, 2]. This pathogen causes several types of diseases ranging from respiratory tract infections to severe invasive disease, such as meningitis, sepsis, bacteremia, pneumonia, and epiglottitis [3]. Initially, H. influenzae strains were classified in capsulated strains (6 capsular serotypes from type Hia through type Hif) and noncapsulated strains named as nontypeable (NTHi) because these are nonreactive with any typing antisera [4]. For a long time, NTHi was the most frequently isolated bacterial pathogens in noninvasive diseases as otitis media and sinusitis in children [1, 5, 6]. However, there have been reported cases of invasive disease caused by NTHi, and moreover, these bacteria have an important role in exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in adults; due to this, NTHi is considered as an emerging pathogen [7, 8]. Currently, a vaccine that confers protection against diseases caused by NTHi is not available. A big problem to develop a vaccine is the diversity of NTHi clinical isolates [9], so the challenge is to find a common antigen to all NTHi strains to begin with the development of a vaccine.

Enolase or 2-phospho-D-glycerate hydrolase (EC is a metalloenzyme that catalyzes the dehydration of 2-phosphoglycerate (2-PG) to phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) in the glycolytic way, requires ion magnesium (Mg2+) for their correct function, and is conserved in all eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells [10, 11]. However, this enzyme is considered as moonlighting protein with activity as a virulence factor associated with the surface of pathogens [12] and importantly used as potential immunogen against several bacteria such as Streptococcus iniae [13], Staphylococcus aureus [14], and Vibrio parahaemolyticus [15], showing specificity and capacity to confer protection to experimental infected model.

Although several enolases have been studied with potential as immunogens, the role of enolase in NTHi and their immunogenicity is understood. In this study, we analyzed the immunogenic properties of NTHi enolase and determined the potential to develop an efficient vaccine.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Growing Conditions

Four strains (two typeable and two nontypeable) of H. influenzae are described as follows: HibBUAPNAN (type b strain, isolated from cerebrospinal fluid from a case of pediatric meningitis), NTHiBUAP96 (strain nontypeable isolated from the middle ear of a case of pediatric otitis media), HiNTBUAPPAU (strain nontypeable isolated from the middle ear of a case of adult otitis media), and HibATCC33930 (strain ATCC of H. influenzae type b isolated from cerebrospinal fluid) [16] were cultured in brain-heart infusion (BHI) agar medium (Bioxon de Mexico) supplemented with 5% Fildes (peptic digest of sheep blood that supplies the X (haemin) and V (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, NAD), factors necessary for the adequate growth of H. influenzae). The strains were incubated at 37°C, 24 h, in a humid atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The E. coli DH5α strain [genetic characteristics: F-Φ80lacZΔM15 Δ(lacZYA-argF) U169 recA1 endA1 hsdR17 (rk-, mk+) phoA supE44 thi-1 gyrA96 relA1 λ-, and BL21 (DE3) pLysS: F-, ompT hsdSB (rB-mB-) gal dcm (DE3) pLysS (CamR)]; both from Invitrogen™ were grown in Luria-Bertani plates or in Luria-Bertani broth (Bioxon de Mexico) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h under aerobic conditions. Where appropriate, media were supplemented with chloramphenicol at 34 mg mL−1 and/or with ampicillin at 100 mg mL−1.

2.2. Hieno Gene Amplification and Sequencing

The DNA fragment that codes for Haemophilus influenzae enolase (Hieno) was amplified from purified genomic DNA of four H. influenzae strains (HibBUAPNAN, NTHiBUAP96, HiNTBUAPPAU, and HibATCC33930) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using a forward primer (5-CTCGAGATGGCAAAAATCGTTAAAGTGATTG-3) and a reverse primer (5-GGTACCCTTGACCTTTAACCGCTTTTAAG-3) that introduced both XhoI and KpnI restriction sites (italicized), respectively.

The PCR reaction carried out in a volume of 25 μL contained 1 μg of template, 2 mM of forward and reverse primers, 2 mM MgCl, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 1X PCR buffer, and 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (NEB, MA, USA). The amplification conditions were 95°C for 1 min, 58°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min for 30 cycles, and 72°C for 10 min. Subsequently, the PCR products of one typeable and one nontypeable strain were cloned in pCR®2.1-TOPO vector (LacZα operon, multiple cloning site, T7 promoter, f1 origin, kanamycin and ampicillin resistance, and pUC origin, Invitrogen™ by Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The resulting plasmids (TOPO::HibBUAPNANeno and TOPO::NTHiBUAP96eno) were transformed in Escherichia coli DH5α cells, and the recombinant positive clones were picked up and later sequenced. The sequence corresponding to NTHiBUAP96eno (NTHiENO) was submitted to GenBank (access number: MF405339.1).

2.3. Bioinformatics Analysis

From the database of National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), the sequences of enolase of different microorganisms which presented greater homology with Hieno by Basic Local Alignment Sequence Tool (, as well as the sequences where enolase has been used as a vaccine, were obtained. Amino acid sequences were aligned using ClustalW (, and neighbor-joining analysis was performed employing the MEGA X package [17].

The enolase human sequence was used as an outgroup. Gaps were treated as pairwise deletions; amino acid distances were calculated using the Poisson model, and branch support was estimated using bootstrap analysis (1000 bootstraps). Furthermore, the NTHiENO sequence was analyzed to calculate its molecular weight; isoelectric point (pI) and stability index were assessed using ExPASy ProtParam server (, posttranslation modification sites by MotifScan (, functional domain and key sites by InterProScan (, transmembranal region and topology structure by TMpred (, and secondary structure and disulfide bond by PredictProtein (, and linear B cell epitopes were predicted using BepiPred 2.0 Server ( and CTL epitopes by NetCTL 1.2 Server ( Proteasomal cleavage sites in CTL epitopes were predicted by NetChop 3.1 server (; on the other hand, the prediction of antigenicity of NTHiENO was predicted using VaxiJen v.2.0 server ( and the allergenicity was made by AllergenFP v.1.0 (

2.4. Subcloning, Expression, and Purification of HiENO

The Hieno DNA sequence was digested from TOPO::NTHiBUAP96eno and TOPO:: HibBUAPNANeno plasmids by double enzyme digestion with XhoI and KpnI and subcloned into the expression vector pRSET-A (overexpression vector, Ampr, and 6x His, Invitrogen™ by Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), obtaining the plasmids pRSET-A::HiNTBUAP96eno and pRSET-A::HibBUAPNANeno; the correct subcloning was confirmed by restriction enzyme analysis and sequencing (results not shown). Since the enolase sequences of the typeable and nontypeable strains present a high degree of homology, approximately of 99%, we decided to obtain only the recombinant enolase of NTHiBUAP96 strain (rNTHiENO) as described below.

E. coli BL21(DE3) pLysS cell containing the plasmid pRSET-A::HiNTBUAP96eno was grown to mid-logarithmic phase at 37°C, in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium supplemented with ampicillin (100 mg mL−1) and chloramphenicol (34 mg mL-1); subsequently, isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added at a final concentration of 1 mM to induce overexpression of the recombinant protein (rNTHiENO); the culture was kept 3 hours in constant shaking at 37°C. After induced expression, the bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation at for 5 min at 4°C. The final pellet was resuspended in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 500 mM NaCl, and 5 mM imidazole and disrupted by sonication, followed by centrifugation at for 10 min at 4°C; the supernatant was obtained, and the recombinant protein (rNTHiENO) was purified through Ni-NTA-agarose affinity chromatography (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The rNTHiENO was eluted with elution buffer 20 mM Tris-HCl (), 500 mM NaCl, and 1 M imidazole. Finally, purified rNTHiENO was resolved on 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) to analyze its expression. Aliquots of the purified protein were stored at −80°C, and the protein concentration was determined using the Bradford protein assay.

2.5. Identification of rNTHiENO by Western Blot Analysis

Purified recombinant rNTHiENO (10 μg) was resolved on a 12% SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose membrane at 15 V for 40 min. The membranes were blocked with a blocking buffer (5% skimmed milk ( in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS))) for 1 h at 37°C under gentle agitation, followed by three washes with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBST), and then were incubated overnight at 4°C with antihistidine monoclonal antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 1 : 5000 dilution in 2% skimmed milk-PBS.

After the washing procedure, the membranes were subsequently incubated with anti-mouse IgG alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibody (Novex® by Life Technologies) diluted at 1 : 5000 for 1 h at 37°C, and the signal was revealed with nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) chloride and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyphosphate p-toluidine salt (BCIP) (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

2.6. Generation of rNTHiENO Polyclonal Antibodies

For the immunization scheme, eight New Zealand rabbits were randomly assigned to the control or immunized groups of four animals each. The rabbits were bled to collect preimmune sera; later, they were immunized with 100 μg of rNTHiENO with complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) (Sigma) by intramuscular puncture, followed by three boosters with the same concentration of recombinant protein emulsified with incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) (Sigma) in a period of fifteen days each. The control group received PBS/adjuvant in the same schedule as the immunized rabbits; at the end of the immunization scheme, the rabbits were bled to obtain the hyperimmune sera. The rabbits were housed in a controlled environment and managed according to the National Institutes of Health Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals and followed the guidelines of the Norma Official Mexicana Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NOM-062-ZOO-1999) and with the approval of the Claude Bernal Animal Care and Use Committee of the Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla.

2.7. Generation of H. influenzae Polyclonal Antibodies

Polyclonal antiserums against the NTHiBUAP96 and HibBUAPNAN were obtained as follows: a culture of either bacteria NTHi or Hib was recovered in sterile PBS until 109 CFU/mL was obtained and an aliquot with 0.3 mL was subcutaneously injected into two New Zealand rabbits (2.5-3.0 kg) emulsified with an equal volume of complete Freund’s adjuvant. The animals received four booster injections (on days 14, 22, 30, and 38 after initial priming immunization) in the presence of incomplete Freund’s adjuvant. Antibody titers were examined by western blot at 0, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after the last immunization, and the animals were sedated and killed by cardiac exsanguination at the end of the fourth week and the serum collected was stored at −20°C until use.

2.8. Enolase Identification by Indirect Immunofluorescence (IFI)

For microscopic examinations, bacteria (NTHiBUAP96, NTHiBUAPPAU, HibBUAPNAN, and HibATCC33930) were grown overnight on cultures in BHI supplemented with Fildes at 37°C. Later, a drop containing two to three colonies was resuspended in 10 μL of PBS and was pipette onto a glass slide, dried and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.4 for 30 min at room temperature. Slides were washed two times in PBS. After that, samples were incubated all night at 4°C with anti-rNTHiENO polyclonal antiserum (dilution 1 : 50 in 0.1% bovine serum albumin in PBS) and another 60 min at 37°C with anti-rabbit FITC-labeled IgG purchased from Zymax™ (dilution 1 : 250 in BSA-PBS). The slides were then washed with PBS, and 8 μL of VECTASHIELD Antifade Mounting Medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories) was added to the sample before topping with a coverslip. All preparations were examined by epifluorescence microscopy using a Motic BA410E microscope with a 60x or 100x oil immersion objectives. Ten to twenty fields of each sample were acquired using a Digital WiFi Microscope Camera Moticam X2 (Motic). Images were analyzed and processed using Motic camera software.

2.9. Wild Enolase Identification by Western Blot

Briefly, H. influenzae strains (typeable and nontypeable) were harvested from cultures and resuspended in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 5 mM EDTA; 1% Nonidet P-40; 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride; 10 mg/mL aprotinin; 50 U/L Trasylol; 10 mg/mL leupeptin) by repeated freezing and thawing cycles. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation (30 min, 4°C at ), and the supernatants were collected and resolved by 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE, 10 μg per lane) or purified rNTHiENO (10 μg per lane). Proteins were electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose membranes at 15 V for 40 min. The membranes were blocked with a blocking buffer (5% skimmed milk ( in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS))) for 1 h at 37°C, washed three times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBS-T), and then incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-rNTHiENO polyclonal antibodies (1 : 1000 dilution in 2% skimmed milk-PBS). For the titration assay, 10 μg per lane of rNTHiENO was migrated and electrotransferred; after that, different dilutions of the anti-rNTHiENO polyclonal antiserum were performed (1 : 1000; 1 : 10000; 1 : 20000; 1 : 50000; 1 : 40000 in 2% skimmed milk-PBS). The negative control consisted of a pool of serum from different healthy rabbits diluted at 1 : 500 in 2% skimmed milk-PBS. After washing, the membranes were incubated with secondary antibody conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (Millipore) for 1 h at 37°C and diluted at 1 : 5000 in 2% skimmed milk-PBS. The blots were visualized with nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) chloride and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyphosphate p-toluidine salt (BCIP) (Thermo Scientific).

3. Results

3.1. Obtaining the DNA Fragment That Codes for Hieno

From purified DNA genomic of several H. influenzae strains typeable and nontypeable, the encoding region to enolase of NTHiBUAP96 was ligated to the pRSET-A vector. PCR reaction was performed with the aim to obtain the DNA fragment that codes for Hieno. A band of 1.3 kbp was obtained in all strains assayed HibATCC33930, HiNTBUAPPAU, HibBUAPNAN, and HiNTBUAP96 (Figure 1(a)). After that, the product corresponding to fragment that codes for Hieno of HibBUAPNAN and HiNTBUAP96 was subcloned into pRSET-A plasmid (Figure 1(b)), and the construction result was sequenced to confirm that the PCR product inserted corresponds to fragment that codes for Hieno.

The complete enolase sequences of both HibBUAPNAN and NTHiBUAP96 strains were obtained, which have 99.54% homology. NTHiBUAPPAU and HibBUAP33930 just obtained the partial sequence. The sequences obtained in this study were compared with the enolase of typeable and nontypeable H. influenzae strains that are available in the database of National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI); the results showed >99% homology. These results indicate that the enolase sequences in all H. influenzae strains have no significant difference (data not shown). The sequence corresponding to NTHiBUAP96eno (NTHiENO) was submitted to GenBank (access number: MF405339.1).

The traduced sequence reports that NTHiENO (HiNTBUAP96) has 437 amino acids with a theoretical molecular weight and pI of 46.30 kDa and 5.03, respectively. The half-life was estimated at 30 h, and the protein was classified as stable with a stability index (II) of 28.60 (a value below 40 is considered stable).

The in silico analyses were made with the enolase sequence of both strains, but the results yielded the same data; for this reason, the results are only shown for the enolase of the NTHiBUAP96 strain.

3.2. Bioinformatics Assays with the NTHiENO Sequence
3.2.1. Identification of the Catalytic and Metal-Binding Site

With the aim to identify if NTHiENO sequence contains the characteristic motif of enolases, several sequences were downloaded of the DataBank (PubMed) and alignments were done. HiENO sequence shows a strong identity as well as with the heterologous sequence of Vibrio parahaemolitycus (85%). With other enolase sequences (bacteria, parasites, and eucarya organism), HiENO showed identity percent ranging from 57% to 24% (Figure 2). The alignment between this enolase’s sequences revealed that NTHiENO presents the motifs of enolase as Mg2+-binding sites, substrate-binding sites, the sequence considered as enolase signature, the fingerprint motif, putative plasminogen-binding motif, and exRNA-binding sites (Table 1).

FeatureH. influenzaeS. pneumoniaeH. sapiens

Catalytic sitesH159H155H158
RNA binding (%)a58RFLGKGVLK66 (44%)58RYGGLGTQK6656RYMGKGVSK64
103KSNFGA108 (50%)103KGKLGA108103KSKFGA108
310GDRVQL315 (66.67%)310GKKVQL315312GIQV315
400RSDRIAK406 (85.71%)400RTDRIAK406400RSERLAK406
Plasminogen binding (%)b252FYNKENGMY260 (55.5%)248FYDKERKVY256251FFRSGKY257

aHomology percent with respect to exRNA-binding sites in S. pneumoniae [17]. bHomology percent with respect to plasminogen-binding site in S. pneumoniae [29].
3.2.2. Identification of the Plasminogen-Binding Site

With the aim to localize a putative site for interaction with plasminogen in the NTHiENO sequence, an alignment was realized and a putative plasminogen-binding site (252FYNKENGMY260) was identified; this site really is present in several sequences of parasites and bacteria, which is inclusive and had an important percent of homology (55.5%) with the characterized plasminogen-binding site in S. pneumoniae (Table 1). This result indicates that H. influenzae enolase could bind to the human plasminogen through this putative plasminogen-binding motif as has been demonstrated in other models.

3.2.3. Identification of Host-Derived Extracellular RNA- (exRNA-) Binding Sites

Recently, it has been demonstrated in S. pneumoniae the presence of six exRNA-binding sites in the enolase protein; moreover, these motifs are important for the adhesion to and its internalization into different cells [18]. Therefore, in this study, the putative exRNA-binding sites in NTHiENO sequence were identified. NTHiENO shows five out of six exRNA-binding sites with an identity between 44 and 85% (Table 1); importantly, they conserved amino acids with positive charge (lysine and arginine) presumptively implicated in the interaction with exRNA. Only one motif was not present in NTHiENO corresponding to 432LKK434 motif, located in the C-terminal region of S. pneumoniae enolase. Although it is unknown if H. influenzae interact with exRNA, there is a possibility that HiENO may interact with the host-derived exRNA, favoring adhesion to the host’s cells. However, experimental studies are required to verify this.

3.2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

The phylogenetic analysis showed that two major clades are grouped, one corresponding to eukaryotic (support value 91%) and the other one to prokaryotic (support value 63%) organism. Furthermore, NTHiENO is partaking of the node with V. parahaemolyticus (Figure 3).

3.2.5. Predicted Epitopes for B and T Cells

With the NTHiENO amino acids, traduced sequences realized predictions to determine if this protein could be immunogenic. The bioinformatics assays predicted the presence of 10 linear B cell epitopes and 13 CTL epitopes conserved into several HLA supertype alleles (Figure 4). The 13 CTL epitopes were examined for the presence of proteasomal cleavage sites using NetChop 3.1 program. All the epitopes displayed several cleavage sites to be processed by the proteasome; this processing by cytosolic pathway is essential for a peptide to act as CTL epitope. Further, four predicted B cell epitopes have overlapped with CTL epitopes (Table 2).

Peptide no.Peptide sequenceHLA super typeOverlapping with B epitopeProteasomal cleavage sites

1HLEGGFVGLA26, B39, B44NoYes (2 sites)
2ASTGSREALB7, B39YesYes (4 sites)
3RFLGKGVLKA3, B27, B29YesYes (4 sites)
4SNFGANAILA2, B39, B58NoYes (2 sites)
5AASKGLPLYA1, A3, A26, B7, B58, B62NoYes (3 sites)
6ELNGTAGVYA1, A26, B44, B62NoYes (3 sites)
7GAKTLREALB7, B8, B58NoYes (3 sites)
8EVFHNLAKVA26, B8, B44NoYes (4 sites)
9EAVEKAGYVA26, B7, B39NoYes (3 sites)
10YVLGKDUTLA2, B8, B39, B62NoYes (5 sites)
11FTSQEFTHYA1, A26, B39, B44, B58, B62YesYes (4 sites)
12ESDWEGFAYA1, A26, B44, B58YesYes (2 sites)
13LTETLAAIKA1, A2, A3, B44NoYes (4 sites)

3.2.6. Prediction of Antigenicity and Allergenicity

The antigenicity prediction results by VaxiJen v.2.0 showed a value of 0.4828 (probable antigen); in turn, AllergenFP v.1.0 classifies it as a nonallergen protein; these in silico results indicate that NTHiENO is antigenic and should not cause an allergic reaction inside of the body.

3.2.7. Predicted a Transmembrane (TM) Domain

With the aim to know if H. influenzae enolase could be in surface, a bioinformatics assay was realized. These studies showed that enolase sequences have a predicted transmembranal domain in the region comprised by amino acids Asn105-Ala124. Through this transmembranal domain, enolase could be anchoring to the cell surface in H. influenzae (Supplementary Figure 1).

3.3. Expression and Purification of rNTHiENO

The enolase encoding region of NTHiBUAP96 was ligated to the pRSET-A vector and expressed as a His-tag fusion protein in E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS cells. The purified protein had a predicted size of approximately 52 kDa, which includes an approximately 6 kDa peptide corresponding to tag fusion (Figure 5(a), lane 5). Then, the purified H. influenzae enolase was recognized as a single band (approximately 52 kDa) by western blot assays using a monoclonal anti-His antibody (Figure 5(b), lane 2). A slight signal was identified in extract of E. coli Bl21 with the noninduced recombinant plasmid (Figure 5(b), lane 1).

3.4. Polyclonal Antibodies Anti-NTHiENO Are Specifics

In this study, rabbits were immunized with rNTHiENO to produce polyclonal antibodies. At the end of the immunization scheme, polyclonal anti-rNTHiENO antibodies were quantified and a high titer (1 : 40000) was observed by western blot assay (Figure 6). After that, the serum of these immunized rabbits was used in western blot assays as a first antibody against H. influenzae typeable and nontypeable total protein extracts and purified rNTHiENO; these antibodies were capable to detect a band of 52 kDa (Figure 7, lane 9) demonstrating a strong reactivity and antigenicity of rNTHiENO. Moreover, anti-rNTHiENO polyclonal antibodies specifically recognized an approximately 46 kDa band in all total protein extracts of H. influenzae (Figure 7, lanes 1-8), which corresponded to the predicted native size of H. influenzae enolase and shows a good specificity.

The antibodies generated against rNTHiENO were also used in immunofluorescence assays against typeable (Hib) and nontypeable H. influenzae strains. In nonpermeabilized bacteria, the labeling was found in the membrane of both strains, while intense fluorescence is observed in NTHi and also observed spots of fluorescence on Hib strains. This localization might facilitate its recognition by the host’s immune system, suggesting that NTHiENO could have strong antigenic properties (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

H. influenzae is a bacterium with medical importance because it is the cause of a great variety of local and systemic infections, which mainly affects children under 5 years, adults over 65 years, and immunocompromised individuals [19]. In 1989, the vaccine against H. influenzae serotype b was introduced, which has been very successful [2022]. However, it does not protect against the rest of the serotypes or against nontypeable strains. Recent studies have reported an increase in the incidence of invasive infections caused by non-Hib strains [8]. A study conducted in Bogotá, Colombia, in the period of 2002-2013 was isolated to different strains of H. influenzae from invasive diseases. 50.5% were of patients with meningitis, 23.5% of pneumonias, 19.5% of sepsis and bacteremia, 2.0% of others, and 4.5% without data, where the predominant serotype was Hib (40.5%), followed by HiNT (38.0%), Hia (17.5%), Hid (2.0%), Hif (1.5%), and Hie (0.5%) [23]. It is important to mention that continuous surveillance is essential for all H. influenzae infections, since non-b serotypes and nontypeable strains can become the main cause of invasive diseases [24].

The lack of a vaccine that generates protection against all serotypes and nontypeable strains promotes the search for new antigens with immunogenic potential against this bacterium.

On the other hand, due to biotechnological approach, the massive sequencing of the genome of multiple microorganisms and the design of bioinformatics tools have given way to the use of reverse vaccinology, a recent approach and first described by Rappuoli in early 2000 [25, 26]. This method is used to predict antigens through the development of genomics and bioinformatics tools [27].

Enolase is an essential enzyme in the metabolism of glucose in different organisms [28]; however, the presence of this protein has been demonstrated on the cell surface of some microorganisms such as bacteria, parasites, and yeasts, where it is found as a plasminogen receptor, and moreover, it has also been shown to be an antigen capable of generating a specific and protective immune response that leads to the neutralization of an infection [13, 15, 2933].

Due to the above discussion, in this work, we studied the presence of enolase on surface of H. influenzae and if NTHiENO could be immunogenic and even more, and if it could generate cross immunogenicity for the typeable and nontypeable H. influenzae strains.

Initially, the cloning, expression, and in silico characterization of the enolase of NTH. influenzae were performed by molecular and immunological techniques. The results demonstrated the rNTHiENO recombinant protein has an approximate weight of 52 kDa fused to His-tag (Figure 5(a), lane 5), and this band was identified by western blot, using anti-His6X monoclonal antibodies (Figure 5(b), lane 2). However, to identify the wild enolase in several H. influenzae strains (NTHi and Hib) in total protein extracts, a band with an approximate weight of 46.30 kDa was resolved (Figure 7, lanes 1-8). These results coincide with the enolase weights reported for V. parahaemolyticus (48 kDa) [15], S. iniae (47 kDa) [13], C. albicans (47 kDa) [34], T. cruzi (46.01 kDa) [35], and A. actinomycetemcomitans (47 kDa) [36].

On the other hand, a multiple alignment of the enolase of different species was performed, in which the expression of enolase in the cell surface has been reported, functioning as a receptor to plasminogen (Figure 2 and Table 1).

It is important to highlight that the enolase of the HiNTBUAP96 and HibBUAPNAN strains has a 99.54% identity; this result indicates that the change between the amino acid sequence of the typable and nontypable strains is not significant. The bacterial enolase with the highest identity with NTHiENO is V. parahaemolyticus (85%), and NTHiENO has the lowest identity with human enolases (50%). With the rest of the species, it has a 24-57% identity. Also were identified are the essential residues for its activity, such as the catalytic site and magnesium-binding residues, which determine the necessary conformation for dimerization and enzymatic function as well as the signature of enolase. These motifs coincide with reported by different authors [13, 28, 32, 35].

Plasminogen is a 92 kDa proenzyme; the N-terminal region of plasminogen contains five kringle domains of 80 amino acids, which contain lysine-binding sites [37, 38]; interaction with lysine leads to a conformational change, which makes it more susceptible to cleavage by plasminogen activators (PAs) [39].

An internal motif responsible for plasminogen binding that is exhibiting affinity for kringle domains has been identified in enolase of multiple organisms such as V. parahaemolyticus [15], Streptococcus mutans [40], Streptococcus iniae [13], Leishmania mexicana [41], and Trypanosoma cruzi [35]. A predicted plasminogen-binding motif (252FYNKENGMY260) was identified in the enolase sequence of H. influenzae; this motif showed a 55.5% similarity with the nine amino acid motifs detected in enolase of S. pneumoniae (FYDKERKVY; the crucial residues for plasminogen binding are shown in italics). It is reported that point mutations of these amino acids greatly decrease the binding to plasminogen [30, 40]. Of the three important amino acids, Lys255 and Glu256 are conserved in enolase sequence of H. influenzae. These data allow us to assume that HiENO could interact with human plasminogen through this putative motif identified in its sequence and that Lys 255 and Glu256 could be important residues to mediate this interaction, which has already been well characterized in S. pneumoniae.

On the other hand, the expression of exRNA has been demonstrated in important biological fluids as the blood, semen, saliva, vaginal secretions, and menstrual blood [42]. In S. pneumoniae, it has been demonstrated that enolase sequence presents six important binding motifs to exRNA, and moreover, these motifs promote adhesion to endothelial and epithelial cells [18]. In Helicobacter pylori enolase, it was also demonstrated the presence of five motifs conserved that might interact with host-derived exRNA [43]. In this study, the NTHi enolase presents five of these motifs; this could indicate that H. influenzae use these motifs to have adhesion to exRNA, thus contributing to the colonization and dissemination of bacteria; however, more assays must be done to verify this assumption.

One of the aims of this work was to demonstrate if enolase is expressed on the cell surface of H. influenzae. Since enolase is described as a nonclassical export protein due to the lack of signal peptide [44], possible transmembranal helices were located in the enolase sequence by in silico analysis. In these results, a transmembranal (TM) domain is identified in the region comprised by amino acids Asn105-Ala124 (Supplementary Figure 1). These results allow inferring that the enolase of H. influenzae could be anchored in the bacterial membrane through this region. A group of researchers in 2011 identified an alpha helix with hydrophobic characteristics in the enolase of Bacillus subtilis in the position Ala108-Leu126 and within this region a domain TM (Ala110 to Cys118) and may be immersed in the membrane of B. subtilis [45]. In T. cruzi, a transmembrane domain was also identified in the N-terminal region between the amino acids Gly105-Ala122 [35]; these latter data agree with those obtained for enolase from H. influenzae.

Although the precise mechanism by which enolase is exported to the surface is unknown, one hypothesis is that it was carried out by micromaterials; however, it was observed that transport through vesicles is not significant, so there must be alternative mechanisms to release this protein lacking signal peptide to the medium. On the other hand, it has been observed that this alpha helix is essential for their exporting, since when that region is mutated (Ala108-Leu126) and replaced by another alpha helix (so as not to alter the three-dimensional structure); note that the enolase of B. subtilis is no longer secreted into the environment [45].

On the other hand, the immunogenic properties of NTHiENO were analyzed using a bioinformatics approach. When the protein was analyzed with the VaxiJen program, it showed that enolase could function as a protective antigen. In turn, along the enolase sequence, 10 epitopes were predicted for B cells and 13 for CTL cells, and four of them showed overlap. In this regard, previous reports confirm that stimulation with recombinant enolase from Clonorchis sinensis (rCs enolase) leads to the production of IgG1 and IgG2a and that rCs enolase fused with a Bacillus subtilis spore induces Th1/Th2 immune responses [46]. On the other hand, C. albicans enolase can stimulate the secretion of IL-12 and IL-10, in addition to protective antibodies IgG1 and IgG2a isotype [47]. Another study showed that recombinant enolase from T. cruzi was recognized by sera from infected patients; this indicates that enolase is recognized by the immune system of the patients and therefore is immunogenic [35]. The use of enolase to trigger a protective immune response was reported in a study carried out by Wang et al. in 2015, where they observed the participation of enolase in adhesion and invasion processes by Streptococcus iniae in BHK-21 cells (hamster kidney cancer cells); furthermore, immunization with the recombinant protein can confer effective protection against S. iniae infection in mice [13]. Another study also reports that S. sobrinus rEnolase acts as an immunogenic antigen, observing a correlation between previous immunization of recombinant enolase and decreased oral colonization by S. sobrinus, in the rat model [48].

Further, in Vibrio parahaemolyticus, it was shown that vaccination with recombinant enolase confers effective immunity against a lethal dose of V. parahaemolyticus in a mouse model [15]. The protective effect of enolase has also been observed in parasites. For example, a study conducted in India in 2007 showed that Plasmodium falciparum enolase is present on the surface of merozoites, and the use of anti-P. falciparum enolase antibodies inhibits its growth in vitro culture; in addition, it was also observed that mice immunized with r-Pfen demonstrated protection against the lethal strain Plasmodium yoelii 17XL [49]. Similar results were reported for Ascaris suum enolase, where a decrease of 61.13 and 88.62% is observed in the recovery of larvae and eggs, from mice previously immunized with recombinant enolase and later experimentally infected with 2500 larvae of A. suum; suggesting once again, enolase is a vaccine candidate against A. suum [50]. On the other hand, it has been reported that enolase is involved in cancer, systemic fungal disease, and dental diseases [11], and it has even been reported that the expression of enolase on the surface of lung cancer cells promotes its migration or metastasis [51, 52]. Given its importance in different pathological events, enolase has been described as an immunodominant antigen, considered as a potential vaccine candidate [34, 50] in fungi, bacteria, and parasites, and as therapeutic targets against cancer.

The above studies allow us to propose H. influenzae enolase as a possible immunogen to be studied in the development of a vaccine, also taking into account the in silico analysis which evidences the immunogenic characteristics of this protein.

Finally, immunofluorescence assays showed that enolase is present on the cell surface in both nontypeable (noncapsulated) and typeable (capsulated) H. influenzae strains, although the recognition pattern was different, homogeneous in the nontypeable and in the form of spots in the typeable, probably due to the presence of the capsule that interferes with an adequate anchorage by the enolase. However, these results demonstrate in an important way the presence of the enolase on the bacterial surface, and in addition, the antibodies generated specifically recognize this protein.

These results are in agreement with those described in other bacterial models, where the presence of enolase on the bacterial surface has been described such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Mycoplasma fermentans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis [29, 31, 5355]. Our results indicate that the surface enolase of a bacterium could be a key molecule in pathogenesis by facilitating bacterial interaction with host cells, causing invasion of host tissue.

5. Conclusion

The present study demonstrates that specific polyclonal anti-rNTHiENO antibodies can recognize both typeable and nontypeable strains of H. influenzae. Furthermore, the results obtained in this work suggest that immunization with rNTHiENO will be able to generate a good immunogenic response and could provide protection against experimental infection caused by capsulated and noncapsulated strains of H. influenzae. In addition, we have demonstrated for the first time, to our knowledge, that the H. influenzae enolase protein is located on the cell surface. The immunogenic properties evidenced by in silico analysis and the surface localization of enolase are important features to consider H. influenzae enolase as a potential candidate for vaccine development; however, further studies are needed to confirm that enolase of H. influenzae could be a good vaccine candidate.

Data Availability

All data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared there are no competing financial interests.


This study was supported by a grant of the PRODEP to ACL (PRODEP/511-6/17-8017) from the Programa de Incorporación de Nuevos Profesores de Tiempo Completo and by a grant of the BUAP-VIEP (54/NAT/06G) to RCRG from the Programa Institucional de Fomento a la Investigación y a la Consolidación de Cuerpos Academicos. Y. Osorio-Aguilar (fellowship number 675962) was a recipient of MSc fellowship from CONACYT-México and currently is a recipient of a Ph.D. fellowship also from CONACYT-México.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary 1. Figure S1: NTHiENO transmembrane helix prediction. In order to predict the presence of a transmembrane helix in the enolase sequence, three bioinformatics programs were used: PredictProtein, TMpred, and HMMTOP; these showed very similar results, the presence of a transmembrane helix in the HiENO sequence, and the results obtained in the HMMTOP program are presented. This program predicts the presence of the transmembrane helix from position Asn105 to Ala124 (highlighted in red); it also shows an intracellular or cytoplasmic region Met1-Ser104 and the extracellular region Ser125-Tyr437. (Supplementary Materials)


  1. T. F. Murphy, H. Faden, L. O. Bakaletz et al., “Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae as a pathogen in children,” The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. K. P. Lemon, V. Klepac-Ceraj, H. K. Schiffer, E. L. Brodie, S. V. Lynch, and R. Kolter, “Comparative analyses of the bacterial microbiota of the human nostril and oropharynx,” mBio, vol. 1, no. 3, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. D. C. Turk, “The pathogenicity of Haemophilus influenzae,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. Pittman, “Variation and type specificity in the bacterial species Hemophilus influenzae,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 471–492, 1931. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. F. Clementi and T. F. Murphy, “Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae invasion and persistence in the human respiratory tract,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 1, p. 1, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Agrawal and T. F. Murphy, “Haemophilus influenzae infections in the H. influenzae type b conjugate vaccine era,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 3728–3732, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. van Eldere, M. P. Slack, S. Ladhani, and A. W. Cripps, “Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae , an under-recognised pathogen,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1281–1292, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. D. Langereis and M. I. de Jonge, “Invasive disease caused by nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1711–1718, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Giufrè, L. Daprai, R. Cardines et al., “Carriage of Haemophilus influenzae in the oropharynx of young children and molecular epidemiology of the isolates after fifteen years of H. influenzae type b vaccination in Italy,” Vaccine, vol. 33, no. 46, pp. 6227–6234, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. H. Ji, J. Wang, J. Guo et al., “Progress in the biological function of alpha-enolase,” Animal Nutrition, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 12–17, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. V. Pancholi, “Multifunctional alpha-enolase: its role in diseases,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 902–920, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. V. Pancholi and G. S. Chhatwal, “Housekeeping enzymes as virulence factors for pathogens,” International Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 293, no. 6, pp. 391–401, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. Wang, K. Wang, D. Chen et al., “Cloning and characterization of surface-localized α-enolase of Streptococcus iniae, an effective protective antigen in mice,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 14490–14510, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. E. Glowalla, B. Tosetti, M. Kronke, and O. Krut, “Proteomics-based identification of anchorless cell wall proteins as vaccine candidates against Staphylococcus aureus,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 2719–2729, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. W. Jiang, X. Han, Q. Wang et al., “Vibrio parahaemolyticus enolase is an adhesion-related factor that binds plasminogen and functions as a protective antigen,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 98, no. 11, pp. 4937–4948, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Carabarin-Lima, P. Lozano-Zarain, M. Castañeda-Lucio et al., “Flagellar expression in clinical isolates of non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 592–600, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Kumar, G. Stecher, M. Li, C. Knyaz, and K. Tamura, “MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1547–1549, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. Zakrzewicz, S. Bergmann, M. Didiasova et al., “Host-derived extracellular RNA promotes adhesion of Streptococcus pneumoniae to endothelial and epithelial cells,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 37758, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. F. Jalalvand and K. Riesbeck, “Haemophilus influenzae: recent advances in the understanding of molecular pathogenesis and polymicrobial infections,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 268–274, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Campos, M. Hernando, F. Román et al., “Analysis of invasive Haemophilus influenzae infections after extensive vaccination against H. influenzae type b,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 524–529, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. E. de Almeida, I. de Filippis, A. O. Abreu, D. G. Ferreira, A. L. Gemal, and K. B. Marzochi, “Occurrence of Haemophilus influenzae strains in three Brazilian states since the introduction of a conjugate Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 777–781, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. C. Zanella, M. C. Brandileone, A. L. Andrade et al., “Evaluation of Haemophilus influenzae type b carrier status among children 10 years after the introduction of Hib vaccine in Brazil,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 755–759, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. K. Rodríguez, C. I. Agudelo, and C. Duarte, “Invasive Haemophilus influenzae isolates in children younger than 5 years: distribution of serotypes and antimicrobial sensitivity, SIREVA II, Colombia 2002-2013,” Infection, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 67–74, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Z. Roaa, A. Abdulsalam, G. Shahid, B. Kamaldeen, and A. F. Tariq, “Pediatric invasive disease due to Haemophilus influenzae serogroup A in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: case series,” Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 528–532, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. R. Rappuoli, “Reverse vaccinology,” Current Opinion in Microbiology, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 445–450, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. R. Rappuoli, “Reverse vaccinology, a genome-based approach to vaccine development,” Vaccine, vol. 19, no. 17-19, pp. 2688–2691, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. Meunier, M. Guyard-Nicodeme, E. Hirchaud, A. Parra, M. Chemaly, and D. Dory, “Identification of novel vaccine candidates against Campylobacter through reverse vaccinology,” Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2016, Article ID 5715790, 9 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. X. Liu, C. Zheng, X. Gao, J. Chen, and K. Zheng, “Complete molecular and immunoprotective characterization of Babesia microti enolase,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 8, p. 622, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Bergmann, M. Rohde, G. S. Chhatwal, and S. Hammerschmidt, “alpha-Enolase of Streptococcus pneumoniae is a plasmin(ogen)-binding protein displayed on the bacterial cell surface,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1273–1287, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Bergmann, D. Wild, O. Diekmann et al., “Identification of a novel plasmin(ogen)-binding motif in surface displayed alpha-enolase of Streptococcus pneumoniae,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 411–423, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. I. Ceremuga, E. Seweryn, I. Bednarz-Misa et al., “Enolase-like protein present on the outer membrane of Pseudomonas aeruginosa binds plasminogen,” Folia Microbiologia (Praha), vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 391–397, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. E. de la Torre-Escudero, R. Manzano-Roman, R. Perez-Sanchez, M. Siles-Lucas, and A. Oleaga, “Cloning and characterization of a plasminogen-binding surface-associated enolase from Schistosoma bovis,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 173, no. 1-2, pp. 76–84, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Arce-Fonseca, M. C. Gonzalez-Vazquez, O. Rodriguez-Morales et al., “Recombinant enolase of Trypanosoma cruzi as a novel vaccine candidate against Chagas disease in a mouse model of acute infection,” Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2018, Article ID 8964085, 14 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. P. Sundstrom and G. R. Aliaga, “Molecular cloning of cDNA and analysis of protein secondary structure of Candida albicans enolase, an abundant, immunodominant glycolytic enzyme,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 174, no. 21, pp. 6789–6799, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. Carabarin-Lima, O. Rodriguez-Morales, M. C. Gonzalez-Vazquez et al., “In silico approach for the identification of immunological properties of enolase from Trypanosoma cruzi and its possible usefulness as vaccine in Chagas disease,” Parasitology Research, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 1029–1039, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. H. Hara, H. Ohta, T. Inoue et al., “Cell surface-associated enolase in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans,” Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 349–356, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Derbise, Y. P. Song, S. Parikh, V. A. Fischetti, and V. Pancholi, “Role of the C-terminal lysine residues of streptococcal surface enolase in Glu- and Lys-plasminogen-binding activities of group A streptococci,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 94–105, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. K. Ghosh, I. Coppens, H. Gardsvoll, M. Ploug, and M. Jacobs-Lorena, “Plasmodium ookinetes coopt mammalian plasminogen to invade the mosquito midgut,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 41, pp. 17153–17158, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. K. Lahteenmaki, P. Kuusela, and T. K. Korhonen, “Bacterial plasminogen activators and receptors,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 531–552, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. N. Jones and R. G. Holt, “Cloning and characterization of an α-enolase of the oral pathogen Streptococcus mutans that binds human plasminogen,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 364, no. 4, pp. 924–929, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. G. Vanegas, W. Quinones, C. Carrasco-Lopez, J. L. Concepcion, F. Albericio, and L. Avilan, “Enolase as a plasminogen binding protein in Leishmania mexicana,” Parasitology Research, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 1511–1516, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. E. K. Hanson, H. Lubenow, and J. Ballantyne, “Identification of forensically relevant body fluids using a panel of differentially expressed microRNAs,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 387, no. 2, pp. 303–314, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. J. López-López, I. C. Rodríguez-Luna, E. E. Lara-Ramírez, M. López-Hidalgo, C. G. Benítez-Cardoza, and X. Guo, “Biochemical and biophysical characterization of the enolase from Helicobacter pylori,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, Article ID 9538193, 12 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. V. Kainulainen and T. K. Korhonen, “Dancing to another tune-adhesive moonlighting proteins in bacteria,” Biology (Basel), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 178–204, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. C. K. Yang, H. E. Ewis, X. Zhang et al., “Nonclassical protein secretion by Bacillus subtilis in the stationary phase is not due to cell lysis,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 193, no. 20, pp. 5607–5615, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. X. Wang, W. Chen, Y. Tian et al., “Surface display of Clonorchis sinensis enolase on Bacillus subtilis spores potentializes an oral vaccine candidate,” Vaccine, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1338–1345, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. W. Li, X. Hu, X. Zhang et al., “Immunisation with the glycolytic enzyme enolase confers effective protection against Candida albicans infection in mice,” Vaccine, vol. 29, no. 33, pp. 5526–5533, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Dinis, D. Tavares, I. Veiga-Malta et al., “Oral therapeutic vaccination with Streptococcus sobrinus recombinant enolase confers protection against dental caries in rats,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 199, no. 1, pp. 116–123, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. I. Pal-Bhowmick, M. Mehta, I. Coppens, S. Sharma, and G. K. Jarori, “Protective properties and surface localization of Plasmodium falciparum enolase,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 75, no. 11, pp. 5500–5508, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. N. Chen, Z. G. Yuan, M. J. Xu et al., “Ascaris suum enolase is a potential vaccine candidate against ascariasis,” Vaccine, vol. 30, no. 23, pp. 3478–3482, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. K. C. Hsiao, N. Y. Shih, H. L. Fang et al., “Surface α-enolase promotes extracellular matrix degradation and tumor metastasis and represents a new therapeutic target,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 7, article e69354, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. Capello, S. Ferri-Borgogno, P. Cappello, and F. Novelli, “α-Enolase: a promising therapeutic and diagnostic tumor target,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 278, no. 7, pp. 1064–1074, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. A. Yavlovich, H. Rechnitzer, and S. Rottem, “Alpha-enolase resides on the cell surface of Mycoplasma fermentans and binds plasminogen,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 75, no. 12, pp. 5716–5719, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. À. Díaz-Ramos, A. Roig-Borrellas, A. García-Melero, and R. López-Alemany, “α-Enolase, a multifunctional protein: its role on pathophysiological situations,” Journal of Biomedicine & Biotechnology, vol. 2012, Article ID 156795, 12 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. A. Rahi, S. K. Matta, A. Dhiman et al., “Enolase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a surface exposed plasminogen binding protein,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects, vol. 1861, no. 1, pp. 3355–3364, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. N. Saitou and M. Nei, “The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 406–425, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. J. Felsenstein, “Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap,” Evolution, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 783–791, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. E. Zuckerkandl and L. Pauling, “Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins,” in Evolving genes and proteins, pp. 97–166, Elsevier, 1965. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Yesenia Osorio-Aguilar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.