The Mechanisms of Systemic Inflammatory and Immunosuppressive Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure and Application Prospect of Single-Cell Sequencing

Kou, Kai; Sun, Xiaodong; Tian, Guangyao; Zhi, Yao; Fan, Zhongqi; Lv, Guoyue

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5091275

Journal of Immunology Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Abbreviations Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 5091275 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5091275

The Mechanisms of Systemic Inflammatory and Immunosuppressive Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure and Application Prospect of Single-Cell Sequencing

Kai Kou,¹Xiaodong Sun,¹Guangyao Tian,¹Yao Zhi,¹Zhongqi Fan,¹and Guoyue Lv¹

Academic Editor: Xiaofeng Yang

Received29 Mar 2022

Revised14 Sept 2022

Accepted11 Oct 2022

Published02 Nov 2022

Abstract

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a complex clinical syndrome, and patients often have high short-term mortality. It occurs with intense systemic inflammation, often accompanied by a proinflammatory event (such as infection or alcoholic hepatitis), and is closely related to single or multiple organ failure. Liver inflammation begins when innate immune cells (such as Kupffer cells (KCs)) are activated by binding of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) from pathogenic microorganisms or damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) of host origin to their pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Activated KCs can secrete inflammatory factors as well as chemokines and recruit bone marrow-derived cells such as neutrophils and monocytes to the liver to enhance the inflammatory process. Bacterial translocation may contribute to ACLF when there are no obvious precipitating events. Immunometabolism plays an important role in the process (including mitochondrial dysfunction, amino acid metabolism, and lipid metabolism). The late stage of ACLF is mainly characterized by immunosuppression. In this process, the dysfunction of monocyte and macrophage is reflected in the downregulation of HLA-DR and upregulation of MER tyrosine kinase (MERTK), which weakens the antigen presentation function and reduces the secretion of inflammatory cytokines. We also describe the specific function of bacterial translocation and the gut–liver axis in the process of ACLF. Finally, we also describe the transcriptomics in HBV-ACLF and the recent progress of single-cell RNA sequencing as well as its potential application in the study of ACLF in the future, in order to gain a deeper understanding of ACLF in terms of single-cell gene expression.

1. Introduction

The liver plays an important role in daily immune monitoring [1]. Due to its special blood supply characteristics, it is constantly exposed to host antigens and various pathogens and toxins from the intestine [2]. In a healthy state, Kupffer cells (KCs), the main phagocytic cells of the liver, account for more than 80% of the total macrophages. Along with dendritic cells (DCs) and neutrophils, KCs mount the innate immune response and play a critical role in the adaptive immune response [3, 4]. In case of injury, the hepatic macrophage counts increase through recruiting monocytes from the bone marrow. In acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), macrophage-mediated inflammation may progress to systemic inflammation and subsequent immunosuppression [5, 6]. An excessive systemic inflammatory response leads to organ failure and death, and immunosuppression makes patients prone to secondary infection events, further exacerbates organ dysfunction, and increases mortality [7]. Based on the latest discovery and research of ACLF, we summarized the clinical manifestations and immunological and microbiological roles in the pathogenesis of ACLF. In addition, we also discussed the preliminary application and application prospect of sequencing technology in ACLF.

2. Clinical Features

Currently, there are two commonly used definitions of ACLF. One is the definition of the European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure Consortium (EASL-CLIF ACLF): (1) patients with acute decompensated cirrhosis have previous episodes of decompensation; (2) precipitating events include intrahepatic (alcoholic hepatitis), extrahepatic (infection, gastrointestinal bleeding, and drug-induced encephalopathy), or both; (3) organ dysfunction involves one or more of the six organ systems (liver, kidney, brain, coagulation, circulation, and respiration); and (4) short-term mortality rate is high (20-80% at 28 days)[8–12]. The other is the definition of Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL ACLF): patients with compensatory cirrhosis (diagnosed or undiagnosed) or noncirrhotic chronic liver disease have the first episode of acute liver deterioration due to acute liver injury directly caused by intrahepatic precipitating events and which involves liver dysfunction, which eventually causes encephalopathy and high short-term mortality (13-86% at 30 days) [13]. For the convenience of subsequent discussion, we combined these two definitions and defined ACLF as a syndrome of acute liver deterioration induced by precipitating events in patients with cirrhosis or noncirrhotic chronic liver disease, leading to failure of two or more organs, accompanied by short-term high mortality.

A number of factors can contribute to ACLF precipitating events. Alcoholic cirrhosis is very common in ACLF in western countries. In Asian countries, however, hepatitis B is a more common precipitating event in patients with ACLF [14]. The infection rate of ACLF patients is extremely high (66.1%). In contrast, acute decompensation (AD) patients have an overall infection rate of 38.7% [15]. Disease progression in ACLF patients is primarily caused by gram-negative bacterial infection, exacerbated by bacterial translocation [5]. In addition, age, mitochondrial damage, and decreased sex hormones may lead to the premature occurrence of immunosenescence and inflammation in chronic liver disease, increasing the risk of ACLF [7].

ACLF has a high short-term mortality rate. Mortality in ACLF patients is higher than in patients with decompensated chronic liver disease, and the number of organ failures rather than the etiology or predisposing event of cirrhosis is the main risk factor for death [16]. Mortality at 28 and 90 days in cirrhosis patients with AD is 5% and 14%, respectively, while in ACLF, it is between 22-78% and 41-79% depending on the grade [8, 17].

3. The Initiation of Hepatic Inflammation

ACLF is usually initiated by hepatic inflammation mediated by inflammatory factors. Inflammatory factors in ACLF patients are exogenous or endogenous [18]. The exogenous factors are mainly bacteria, HBV, and alcohol. The innate immune system initiates its response to invading pathogens upon the recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from cirrhotic patients responded more strongly when stimulated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) than PBMCs from healthy patients [19]. This demonstrates that the pathogen recognition function of the innate immune system is activated in cirrhotic patients, which is more conducive to triggering liver inflammation.

Endogenous factors in ACLF patients include the release of necrotic cells or extracellular matrix degradation [20]. Sterile inflammation results from the recognition of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) after tissue injury [3, 21]. DAMPs are usually sequestered intracellularly, and after being released extracellularly, binding by PRRs on immune cells then triggers an inflammatory response, which leads to the activation of immune cells and a kind of proinflammatory phenotype, thereby initiating inflammatory signals through the release of cytokines and chemokines, which in turn aggravates the inflammatory response in ACLF [22].

4. Systemic Inflammation in ACLF

The persistence of hepatic inflammation can develop into systemic inflammation. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis develop persistent systemic inflammation because of gut dysbiosis, disruption of intestinal mucosal barrier integrity, and persistent translocation of PAMPs [23]. Systemic inflammation drives the occurrence and development of ACLF and causes extensive tissue and organ damage, which leads to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) [24, 25]. In order to overcome SIRS, the body develops compensatory anti-inflammatory responses (CARS), which in turn promote the occurrence of infection and aggravate the proinflammatory response [26].

Macrophages are highly diverse and plastic and play a leading role in the development of ACLF. They have important functions in the response to injury or infection [27]. In the early stage of liver injury, liver macrophages secrete both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines to mediate proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses [28]. Disruption of the intestinal barrier in ACLF patients leads to the translocation of PAMPs such as intestinal bacteria and their products to the liver, which activates macrophages through Toll-like receptors (TLRs), resulting in the secretion of a large number of cytokines and the recruitment of various immune cells, leading to liver and systemic inflammation [23, 29].

During this process, hepatic macrophages can quickly change their phenotype according to the local microenvironment of the liver [30]. They are traditionally divided into M1 and M2 macrophages, according to their differentiation state [31]. The two macrophage populations are functionally distinct: typical functions of the M1 macrophages include antigen presentation and secretion of cytokines IL-6, IL-12, TNF-α, IL-1, CXCL1-3, CXCL-5, CXCL8-10, and type I IFN, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and nitric oxide, which help in inflammatory [32]. In contrast, M2 macrophages show a resting phenotype, expressing mannose receptors, scavenger receptors A and B-1, and CCR2 and CD163, which are involved in tissue healing [33]. CD163, TGM2, and CD206 levels are increased in ACLF patients [26]. IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13 are typically produced by M2 macrophages [34]. It has been reported that macrophages release TNF-α and IL-6 in the initial stage of ACLF, followed by IL-10 [35].

In addition to these resident KCs, liver-recruited monocytes also play an anti-inflammatory or proinflammatory role at various stages of the disease [36]. KCs are exclusively intravascular and distributed along hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells (HSECs), while monocyte-derived macrophages (MoMFs) and monocytes could reside outside the blood vessels [37]. This distribution is beneficial for monocyte and macrophage to play a more comprehensive immune regulatory role in systemic inflammation of ACLF.

5. Mediators of Inflammation in ACLF

Cytokines play an important regulatory role in ACLF. Cytokines are glycoproteins that regulate innate immunity by inducing local and systemic inflammatory responses in ACLF [38]. Activated immune cells secrete a variety of cytokines that further promote tissue damage [14]. Both proinflammatory molecules and anti-inflammatory factors are enhanced during ACLF, reflecting the general activation of cytokine cascades [24, 39].

In ACLF, cytokines are mainly divided into proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, and anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10, IL-4, and IL-1 receptor antagonists [40]. On the one hand, IL-1β, LPS, or TNF-α stimulates TLR4 to induce the synthesis and secretion of IL-6, which is one of the main stimulators of acute phase protein release. The TNF-α signaling pathway, driving apoptosis and necrosis, may be involved in the occurrence of liver injury during ACLF [26]. On the other hand, the level of IL-10 secreted by monocytes in the early stage of ACLF patients is lower than that of healthy controls, but IL-10 secretion is increased in late periods of ACLF [41].

In addition, growth factors such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) are involved in the hematopoiesis and proliferation of liver progenitor cells [42]. In fact, G-CSF improves liver function and survival in ACLF [43]. G-CSF amplifies circulating myeloid and plasmacytoid DCs (mDCs, pDCs) and T cells but decreases IFN-γ production in CD8⁺T cells [44]. In ACLF patients, dysregulation of IFN-γ causes systemic inflammation and impaired liver regeneration [45].

6. Systemic Immunosuppression in ACLF

ACLF is not only associated with severe systemic inflammation, but as the disease progresses, it is also associated with immune tolerance, an adaptive response that reduces the adverse effects of damage on the host [46]. Upon innate immune paralysis, proinflammatory immune cells and proinflammatory factor decrease, and inhibitory immune cells and anti-inflammatory substances increase [47, 48]. In ACLF, tissue macrophages exhibit endotoxin tolerance/immunomodulatory functions. These cells circulate through the bloodstream and further spread to other tissues, thereby contributing to the immunosuppressive phenotype of ACLF [48]. Immune dysfunction leads to the prevalence of infections and low survival in ACLF [24].

The development of immunosuppressive in ACLF involves multiple systems, such as the circulatory, intestinal, hepatic, peritoneal (spontaneous bacterial peritonitis), and reticuloendothelial (RES) systems [49]. Among them, RES-mediated clearance of pathogens depends on the severity of liver dysfunction and downregulates the bactericidal capacity of phagocytes by reducing the synthesis of innate antibacterial proteins in the liver [50]. With the development of the disease, some phenotypic changes of immune cells play a major role in the systemic immunosuppression of ACLF, including innate immune cells and adaptive immune cells, in which the phenotypic changes of monocyte and macrophage play the most prominent role.

6.1. Defects in Innate Immune Cells of ACLF

6.1.1. Monocyte and Macrophage

The expression of HLA-DR reflects the immune response function of monocyte and macrophage. In the early stages of the disease, IL-33 activates the ERK1/2 pathway to restore the expression of HLA-DR, CD80, and chemokine receptor 2 in monocytes and enhances the expression of proinflammatory cytokines in monocytes without affecting their phagocytic activity [51]. In the late stages of the disease, monocyte and macrophage defects in ACLF patients include decreased immune response to microorganism and dysfunction of antigen presentation through decreasing the HLA-DR expression [48, 52]. Although the reduced innate response is a physiological adaptation to continuous PAMP exposure, this change in turn aggravates secondary infection and leads to higher mortality [48, 50]. Moreover, the low HLA-DR expression is positively correlated with prothrombin time, an indicator of liver injury [41].

Another important phenotypic change in immunosuppression is MER tyrosine kinase (MERTK). The upregulation of MERTK on monocytes can cause the immune dysfunction of ACLF [48]. MERTK inhibits inflammation by activating inhibitors of cytokine signaling, blocking TLR activation, and decreasing proinflammatory cytokine production [48]. The MERTK overexpression reduces the in vitro response to LPS and is strongly correlated with ACLF immunosuppression, the SIRS activation level, and disease severity [48].

The amplification of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSCs) and intermediate CD14⁺CD16^- monocytes also plays an important role in ACLF immunosuppression [53, 54]. In ACLF, the expression of M-MDSCs is immunosuppressed by decreasing T cell proliferation, TNF-α secretion, and the phagocytosis of Escherichia coli. Immunosuppression of M-MDSCs may contribute to infection, while TLR3 activation could reverse the expansion of these cells and restore the function of innate immune [53]. MDSCs are also closely associated with the MELD score. In advanced ACLF, nonsurvivors maintain the highest numbers of MDSCs, while survivors show a gradual decline [55]. The intermediate CD14⁺CD16^- monocyte subpopulation is featured by the production of fewer proinflammatory cytokines and more IL-10 after stimulation [48, 53]. Transcriptional profiling also revealed that immunosuppressive parameters are enhanced and antibacterial and antigen presentation mechanisms are impaired [26]. Functional alterations in classical CD14⁺CD16^- monocytes are also evident in ACLF patients, and genes related with immunosuppressive responses are upregulated. Glutamine synthase inhibitors can partially restore the phagocytosis of ACLF monocytes [54].

In addition, hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha-antisense RNA 1 (HIF1A-AS1) also plays a role in the dysfunction of monocyte and macrophage. Studies have shown that TNF-α promotes KC apoptosis by inducing the expression of HIF1A-AS1 [56]. And the apoptosis of KCs may increase the chance of exposure to DAMPs and persistent bacteremia [5].

6.1.2. Neutrophils

Neutrophil dysfunction is associated with secondary infection, organ failure, and high mortality [57–59]. Neutrophils secrete large amounts of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), also named lipidcalin-2, which plays an essential role in innate immunity [60]. ACLF patients had higher basal ROS levels in neutrophils at the early stage, suggesting a neutrophil priming state, whereas fMet-Leu-Phe- (fMLP-) stimulated ROS production is reduced [61, 62]. The reduction in ROS production is due to a marked reduction in phospholipase C activity [63], insufficient phosphorylation [64], and a decrease in protein expression [62]. Together with a defect in the extracellular function of myeloperoxidase that may be the result of reduced AKT and p38 MAP kinase activation, downregulated ROS generation results in insufficient bactericidal activity in late stage of ACLF [64, 65].

In addition, CD11b⁺CD16⁺ neutrophils from ACLF patients also overexpress the chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2, which recognize IL-8, and then induce hepatocyte death [61]. It has also been reported that CXCR1/2 regulates the secretion of various kinds of mediators, causing oxidative stress, which in turn induces cell death [26, 61].

6.1.3. DCs

ACLF expresses low levels of mDCs and pDCs, and even lower levels of these cells are found in nonsurviving patients. Low DC counts are strongly correlated with high mortality. The number of DCs could be enhanced by G-CSF [66]. Treatment with methylprednisolone resulted in increased DC counts, improved liver function, and reduced mortality [67]. In ACLF, monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MoDCs) secrete large amounts of IL-23 and express their receptor IL-23R. Elevated IL-23 levels in nonsurvivors suggest that IL-23 is associated with disease progression and severity [68].

6.1.4. NK Cells

NK cells make up about 15% of lymphocytes in the blood, increasing to 30% in the liver. Even in the absence of MHC, NK cells can recognize damaged cells, which results in a faster immune response [26]. The number of NK cells and CD56^dim CD16^bright NK cells decreases in hepatitis B virus-associated ACLF (HBV-ACLF) [69]. NK cell function is regulated through activating cytotoxicity and inhibiting receptors. In ACLF patients, in addition to downregulation of CD158b, both activating and inhibitory receptors are upregulated. NK cell-mediated killing is significantly reduced in HBV-ACLF, as well as TNF-α production and cytotoxic activity [69, 70], suggesting that inhibitory receptors are superior to activating receptors.

In addition, the increase of CD57⁺ CD3⁺ NK cells in the liver leads to hepatocyte necrosis and leads to its pathogenesis [70]. Similarly, enhanced natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCRs) of NK cells in patients with HBV-ACLF are associated with disease progression [26]. IL-12- and IL-15-stimulated NK cells increase the secretion of TNF-α and IFN-γ. Furthermore, the stimulation of NK cells with IFN-α upregulates not only the expression of NKG2D but also the production of IFN-γ, perforin, TNF-α, and granzyme B. Blocking NKG2D resulted in partial downregulation of these cytokines, leading to impairment of NK function [71]. KCTD9 may also induce liver damage mediated by NK cell in HBV-ACLF [72]. The overexpression of KCTD9 results in significantly increased CD69 expression, enhanced cytotoxicity, and increased IFN-γ production. Inhibition of KCTD9 reduces the cytotoxic function of NK cells.

6.2. Adaptive Immune Cells in ACLF

Upregulation of T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing molecule-3 (Tim-3), CTLA-4, and PD-1 is found in adaptive immunocompromised T cells [73, 74]. And the ratio of regulatory T cells (Tregs) to T cells is higher in ACLF patients than that in normal subjects [75]. The decrease in ratio of CD3⁺ cells to monocytes (T/M) is associated with a poor prognosis of ACLF. The secretion of TNF-α in monocytes can be inhibited by CD4⁺ T cells, CD8⁺ T cells, and Treg, resulting in abnormal monocytes [76]. In addition, some studies have shown that patients with HBV-ACLF have significantly fewer CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells compared with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients [77–79].

Besides, the diversity of CD8⁺ T cells of HBV-ACLF patients decreases during hospitalization, and the proportion of the top 100 CD8⁺ clonotypes increases. And the MELD score has a positive correlation with the diversity of CD8⁺ T cells and a negative correlation with the cumulative frequency of the top 100 clonotypes, suggesting that more CD8⁺ T cell expansion in the early stage is correlated with a better prognosis of HBV-ACLF patients [80].

7. Immunometabolism

Metabolism and immune regulation influence each other. On the one hand, the metabolism of immune cells changes from static state to active state in the process of immune response; on the other hand, the change of metabolism controls the differentiation and function of immune cells [81]. During systemic inflammatory responses, immune cells regulate cellular metabolism to meet high energy demands; the process of binding metabolism to immune cell responses is called immunometabolism [82].

Mitochondria are the centers of cell metabolism; it releases mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), proteins, lipid metabolites, and ROS. These molecules can act as DAMPs that bind to PRRs to initiate an inflammatory response. There is a complex link between mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic disorders in ACLF, resulting in reduced production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), excessive storage of fat, and leakage of ROS [83, 84]. In the leukocytes of ACLF patients, mitochondrial dysfunction is represented by two breakpoints in the citric acid (TCA) cycle linked by an anaplastic reaction of glutaminolysis and nucleoside metabolism [85]. Among them, the metabolites of the TCA cycle can affect the differentiation of macrophages, and the low α-ketoglutarate/succinic acid ratio can enhance the activation of M1 macrophages. What is more, under the condition of inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction leads to the enhancement of aerobic glycolysis and the increase of lactic acid as its end product [86]. Lactic acid produced by activated innate immune cells can limit inflammation and inhibit migration of monocytes and macrophages [87, 88].

Amino acid (AA) metabolism disorder plays an important role in immunometabolism of ACLF. Studies have shown that 43% of the 137 metabolites contained in the metabonomics database are associated with AAs, and the inflammatory response of ACLF patients is closely related to the change of AA metabolism [89]. Kynurenine promotes immune tolerance by inhibiting the proliferation of T cells and NK cells and promoting the proliferation of Tregs and MDSCs [90]. Arginine increases T cell oxygen consumption and mitochondrial respiration. L-glutamine, the most abundant extracellular amino acid, has also been shown to provide energy for T cell proliferation, cytokine secretion, and restoration of phagocytosis in monocytes [54, 91]. The glutamine synthase/glutaminase ratio in monocytes of ACLF patients is positively correlated with disease severity [54].

In addition, lipid metabolism disorder is closely related to ACLF. Inflammation is often associated with lipid metabolism disorders. Patients with ACLF have low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles and phospholipid content, especially lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) containing omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), which is significantly decreased, but fatty acids are significantly increased [92–94]. Circulating saturated fatty acids can cause proinflammatory responses by enhancing the sensitivity of liver cells to TLR agonists [95, 96]. Excessive intake of linoleic acid (LA) leads to an increase in prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), which in turn inhibits macrophage secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and bacterial killing.

8. Microorganism and ACLF

In 40% of ACLF patients with cirrhosis without any identifiable precipitation conditions [8], the transferred bacteria or bacterial products may promote the occurrence and development of ACLF [97]. Impaired innate immune cell function in ACLF inhibits immune function and may lead to infection [47, 48]. In the late stages of ACLF, the proinflammatory response is further exacerbated by the increased probability of infection due to the development of CARS, which exacerbates liver injury [26]. SIRS and CARS are considered to be critical for effector functions of immune cells in ACLF (e.g., monocytes and macrophages), resulting in immune imbalance and bacterial translocation [98].

In addition, other changes also lead to increased bacterial translocation of intestinal microbiome to portal vein and lymphatic circulation in chronic liver disease and ACLF patients, such as altered composition of intestinal microbiome and increased intestinal permeability, which could lead to the permanent stimulation of the immune system by gut-derived PAMPs [99]. It is well known that in the setting of portal hypertension, increased shunting leads to bacterial escape in the reticuloendothelial system (RES) [100]. Therefore, portal hypertension is conducive to bacterial translocation, which is conducive to the activation of innate immunity [101, 102]. Systemic inflammation can also directly or indirectly increase bacterial translocation through enhancing circulatory dysfunction and stimulating sympathetic nervous system homeostasis [15, 103]. And the gut-liver axis acts as a bridge in bacterial translocation in ACLF.

8.1. Gut-Liver Axis

The gut-liver axis presents the immunomodulatory interactions between the gastrointestinal tract and the hepatic sinusoids, bidirectionally linked by the portal circulation and the biliary tree [104]. The liver receives portal blood rich in nutrients and pathogenic microbial products, which leads to moderate constant stimulation of antigens, and maintaining hepatic and systemic immune balance [3].

The microbiota, which includes bacteria, fungi, and viruses, is influenced by factors such as alcohol, diet (e.g., nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)), and drugs (e.g., antibiotics) [105–107]. The microbiota could also be altered by the use of proton pump inhibitors and repeated exposure to antibiotics [108]. The microbial community in cirrhosis shows significant reductions in bacterial diversity and in situ microbial communities. The changes of specific microbiota in cirrhosis mainly included the increase of Fusobacteria, Proteobacteria, Enterococcaceae, and Streptococcaceae and the relative decrease of Bacteroidetes, Ruminococcus, Roseburia, Veillonellaceae, and Lachnospiraceae [109]. The fecal microbial richness and species diversity of patients with decompensated cirrhosis are lower than those of patients with compensatory cirrhosis [110].

These changes in intestinal flora are due to reduced bile flow and cholestasis caused by cirrhosis, which impairs the enterohepatic circulation. This change may be more significant when accompanied by reduced intestinal motility, increased intestinal permeability, barrier dysfunction to lymphatic and hepatic sinusoid, portal hypertension, and immune system disorders [105, 106, 111]. Dysbiosis, in turn, can cause intestinal inflammation, disrupting gut barrier function, leading to bacterial translocations, and reducing the conversion of primary to secondary bile acids in the intestinal tract [112, 113]. Since bile acids are involved in the absorption of fats and fat-soluble proteins (e.g., vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors), they have a significant effect on metabolism and coagulation [109]. Bile acids can regulate the farnesoid X receptor axis and play an important role in the homeostasis of the epithelial barrier and the gut-vascular barrier [114, 115]. Bile acids can also modulate mucosal immune tolerance, controlling innate immune inflammatory signaling and adaptive immunity through regulating the ratio of Th17 and Treg cells, which is disordered in cirrhosis and liver failure [116, 117], while total serum bile acid is positively correlated with disease severity in patients with alcoholic hepatitis [118].

Besides, slow intestinal transport contributes to bacterial overgrowth, which in turn leads to bacterial ectopic development [108]. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs: butyric, acetic, and propionic acid) could decrease intraluminal pH, stimulate mucin production, increase intestinal motility, maintain intestinal epithelial cell viability, and keep enterocyte tight junction integrity [119]. In addition, SCFAs modulate immune responses in gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). They inhibit activation of macrophages and DCs, induce the secretion of inflammatory cytokines, and form a pool of T helper cells [120]. Intestinal barrier disruption is related to downregulation of tight junction proteins occludin and Claudin-1 in intestinal epithelial cells [121].

What is more, gut-related immune system changes include reduced synthesis of antibacterial peptides, immunoglobulin A (IgA), defensins, and hypo- or achlorhydria, causing bacterial translocations that lead to decompensation of cirrhosis [109]. B lymphocytes in GALT play critical roles in luminal IgA secretion and defense against enteric pathogens and maintain gut microbial homeostasis by secreting commensal-specific IgA [122]. IgA in the intestinal lymphoid follicles is transferred to the intestinal lumen through endocytosis, thereby forming the microbiota [123].

9. Treatment

The main principle of ACLF treatment is the diagnosis and management of precipitating events, the most important precipitating events being infection and alcoholic hepatitis, and the general treatments include the application of vasoactive drugs, artificial liver support system (ALSS), and liver transplantation (LT). In addition, we also summarize the application of immunotherapy in ACLF, including targeting systemic inflammation, monocyte and macrophage, or intestinal flora. In addition, ACLF is mainly divided into two phases: early systemic inflammation (the first stage) is manifested as macrophage and DC activation, neutrophil activation, and T cell activation; late immunosuppression (the second stage) is characterized by the following: the hyporesponsive monocyte, decreased inflammatory cytokine production, interventions macrophage and neutrophil phagocytosis, and loss of Kupffer cells and T cells; exhibits Ab responses; and increased susceptibility to opportunistic infections [6]. Treatment may be different at these two different stages.

9.1. Treatment for Infection in ACLF

The most common inducing event in ACLF is infection, including bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. The prevalence of infection is approximately 50% in patients with ACLF, and slightly higher infection rates have been associated with an increased number of organ failures, a poorer outcome, and higher mortality [15, 124]. Bacterial infection control measures are therefore important in medical treatment [125]. A broad antibiotic regimen should cover all potential pathogens, with high-dose antibiotics administered within 48 and 72 hours of infection diagnosis to enhance clinical outcome and decrease selection of resistant strains [125]. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics have a clear therapeutic role in the prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis [126]. The use of fluoroquinolones results in the expansion of Tregs and an improved proinflammatory milieu in the cirrhotic liver [127].

In addition to bacterial infections, patients with hepatitis B should be treated with potent antiviral drugs, such as tenofovir, tenofovir alafenamide, or entecavir [13], which can improve the prognosis of patients with HBV-ACLF [128–130]. What is more, one study reported that 43% of ACLF patients have invasive mycosis, which had higher mortality than patients negative for fungal infection [131, 132]. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) infection accounts for 5–8.3% of HBV-ACLF and 14% of severe alcoholic hepatitis (sAH) patients [133, 134]. Voriconazole is recommended as a first-line choice for IPA primary treatment, but due to its hepatotoxicity, its use in ACLF patients needed to be closely monitored, and its therapeutic trough concentration range of 1-5 μg/mL should be maintained [135].

9.2. Treatment for Alcohol-Related ACLF

In western countries, active alcoholism and sAH contribute to alcohol-related ACLF [136]. One study recommends starting glucocorticoids in early-stage ACLF (the first stage) and early discontinuation of the drug before the onset of advanced immune paralysis (the second stage) [137]. Prednisolone, an anti-inflammatory corticosteroid, is widely recommended for sAH therapy [138, 139]. Glucocorticoid-mediated immunosuppression may increase the chance of bacterial infection with alcoholic hepatitis. Therefore, corticosteroids are best used for short periods of the first stage [140, 141].

However, the use of steroids in the later stages (the second stage) of ACLF, where the anti-inflammatory effect prevails, can be detrimental because it may increase susceptibility to infection [50]. For this reason, it is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of steroids with Lille score, which is based on age, total bilirubin levels, baseline creatinine levels, albumin levels, prothrombin time, and repeated total bilirubin levels [142, 143]. Patients can be classified as complete responders (≤0.16), partial responders (0.16–0.56), or nonresponders (>0.56) based on the Lille score to determine whether to continue or discontinue corticosteroid therapy [140]. Corticosteroid responses in ACLF patients are further reduced as the severity of ACLF increased. Patients with a Lille score of <0.45 had a poorer response to corticosteroids and had a lower 6-month survival rate [143].

What is more, some preliminary studies suggest that fecal microbiota transplantation from healthy donors also has beneficial effects on patients with alcohol-related ACLF [144, 145].

9.3. Other General Treatments for ACLF

Some vasoactive agents also play a role in ACLF therapy. Carvedilol improves survival rate and reduces acute kidney injury (AKI) and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) events within 28 days in ACLF patients who have mild esophageal varices with a [146]. In ACLF patients with hepatorenal syndrome-AKI, infusion of terlipressin has an earlier and higher response than treatment with norepinephrine, improving patient survival rate [147].

ALSS can remove toxic substances from the circulation through dialysis techniques [148] and improve the survival rate of HBV-ACLF patients compared with standard medical treatment [149]. Whole plasma exchange improves systemic inflammation and reduces the development of multiorgan failure in patients with ACLF and may be the preferred form of liver support in patients with ACLF [150].

ACLF patients who choose LT therapy have a better prognosis than ACLF patients who are ineligible or not selected for LT therapy [151], with 1-year survival rate approaching 80% after LT compared with less than 20% in patients who do not undergo LT [152–154]. Posttransplant survival in mild ACLF is similar to that in patients without ACLF [155].

9.4. Treatment of Systemic Inflammation (the First Stage) in ACLF

Because systemic inflammation plays a large role in ACLF, drugs targeting systemic inflammation are being explored. IL-22 treatment results in the reorganization of damaged regeneration pathways and protects cells from bacterial infection [45]. IL-22Fc could improve the survival of ACLF mice that enhance many antimicrobial genes via the antiapoptotic protein BCL2 [45].

In addition, stem cell transplantation clearly benefits HBV-ACLF patients through exerting a paracrine immune regulation effect [156]. Hepatocyte transplantation and treatment with bone marrow-derived stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells are called cell therapies. In two open-label controlled studies, ACLF patients are treated with MSCs or allogenic bone marrow MSCs [156, 157]. A study showed that MSCs have immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory functions, which can alleviate liver inflammation, improve liver function and serum albumin, and decrease the chance of infection, which benefits survival rate. The 24-week survival rate is enhanced in the MSC group (73.2%) compared to the standard care group (55.6%) [14, 157].

Human serum albumin (HSA) is demonstrated to be a disease-modifying anti-inflammatory agent capable of reducing inflammatory cytokines in AD cirrhosis patients [97]. Albumin may also act intracellularly by internalizing into endocytic vesicles, thereby blocking inflammatory signaling pathways in ACLF [158]. Transcytosis caused by regulating albumin binding and endocytosis depends on at least seven endothelial and immune cell-associated proteins and receptors [159]. In addition to that, O’Brien et al. previously found that HSA can reverse PEG2-induced immune dysfunction [47].

Other immunomodulatory drugs are also being explored in ACLF [14]. TLR4 inhibitor TAK-242 improved survival rate in experimental ACLF-induced mice [160]. G-CSF can be used to treat hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, and sepsis [161, 162]. Patients with ACLF had increased leukocyte and neutrophil counts and a decreased disease severity index after getting G-CSF treatment [161]. Moreover, studies have shown that pyroptosis plays an important role in the pathogenesis of ACLF. The pyroptosis of hepatocytes induced by high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) amplifies the inflammatory response, thereby aggravating ACLF. Therefore, HMGB1 is also a potential target for ACLF therapy [163, 164].

9.5. Treatment of Targeting Monocyte and Macrophage

Monocyte and macrophage (including KCs) play a decisive role during the occurrence and development of ACLF; therefore, various abnormalities of them in ACLF can be targeted for treatment.

9.5.1. Targeting Liver Macrophages

A study proposes that MERTK antagonism could be used in advanced ACLF (the second stage), when prolonged CARS is prone to infectious complications [48]. Addition of the MERTK inhibitor UNC569 restored response of monocytes to LPS [48]. Silencing HIF1A-AS1 decreased KC apoptosis induced by TNF-α, which also provides a molecular basis for the ACLF therapy [56].

More importantly, the high scavenging capacity of liver macrophages, especially KCs, enables them to be preferentially targeted by drug carrier materials, including hard shell microvesicles, polymers, and liposomes [165], which helps these carrier materials to play a more direct role in controlling liver inflammation.

9.5.2. Inhibiting Activation of Kupffer Cell

In early stages of ACLF (the first stage), limiting profound innate immune activation is a useful immunotherapy strategy. The initial inflammation is primarily mediated by KCs. Then, NF-κB signaling pathways and the P3 inflammasome are also activated, which can be targets of immunotherapy. Another strategy is to target DAMPs, including HMGB-1 and histones [5]. Affecting the gut barrier or gut microbiota, the use of probiotics or antibiotics may alleviate KC activation [166].

9.5.3. Inhibiting Recruitment of Monocyte to the Liver

Monocytes expand in liver disease. In animal models and patients, they are driven by chemokine-chemokine receptor interactions, such as CCL2/CCR2- and CCL5/CCR5-mediated pathways which have a primary function in ACLF [48, 167]. This leads to ideas for targeted therapies, for example, with monoclonal antibodies or small molecule inhibitors [168]. Interestingly, TLR-3 agonists are worthy of further study as potential drugs [55].

9.6. Treatment of Targeting Immunometabolism

By feeding glutamine or α-ketoglutarate into the TCA cycle, the phagocytosis of monocytes in ACLF patients could be restored [54, 169]. Succinic acid is also a potential therapeutic target for patients with ACLF [169]. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1α (PGC-1α), as a major regulator of mitochondria, is a potential therapeutic target for improving mitochondrial dysfunction [170]. To restore lipid metabolism balance, HDL can be increased or the liver X receptor (LXR) can be activated [171, 172].

9.7. Treatments Targeting Gut Microbiota

Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when ingested, provide benefits to the host, either directly or indirectly. It has been shown that they are effective in SCFA production, intestinal barrier integrity, alterations in colonic pH, and modulation of the immune system [173]. Obeticholic acid can reduce portal hypertension and improve intestinal flora, which may have potential benefits in ACLF patients [174]. Long-term oral administration of poorly absorbed antibiotic to prevent bacterial translocation can prevent major cirrhosis complications such as hepatic encephalopathy and AKI [175–177]. Recent translational studies suggest that defective farnesoid X receptor signaling plays a critical role in liver inflammation, intestinal bacterial translocation, and portal hypertension, promoting inflammation in ACLF, and may be targeted by drug agonists [7]. Fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) has been tested in primary sclerosing cholangitis and has been shown to be safe and closely related with significantly increased biodiversity and improved alkaline phosphatase activity. In an animal model of diet-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), normalization of the gut microbiota could directly reverse portal hypertension [178].

10. Transcriptomics and ACLF

10.1. PBMC Transcriptomics in HBV-ACLF

Compared with alcoholic liver disease-associated ACLF patients, abnormal immune processes are more pronounced in HBV-ACLF patients [24]. Transcriptome analysis of HBV-ACLF suggests that viral, immune, and metabolic processes play a central role in the biological process network from acute-on-chronic hepatic dysfunction (ACHD) to ACLF. Virus correlation analysis suggests that virus is involved in various stages of HBV-ACLF. Analysis of immune-related blood transcriptional module (BTM) shows that the expression of genes associated with innate immune response is significantly upregulated while that of genes associated with adaptive immune response (T cells, B cells, and NK cells) is downregulated; as a result, adaptive immunity of ACLF patients may be exhausted [179].

The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with innate immune responses are most significant in five modules (interferon, monocytes, neutrophils, inflammation, and dendritic cells). In the interferon module, including antiviral interferon signature, innate antiviral response and type I interferon response are significantly upregulated. The expression level of these DEGs is the highest in the ACHD group and significantly downregulated in the ACLF group, suggesting that the interferon module may be the initial factor for the occurrence of ACLF. Compared with the normal control (NC) group, monocyte module genes in the ACHD and ACLF groups are significantly upregulated and BTMs associated with neutrophils, inflammatory, dendritic cells, and antigen presentation show consistent changes in the ACHD and ACLF groups [179].

Compared with other diseases, the increased expression of metabolic genes in ACLF patients, most notably genes in PPAR and mTOR signaling pathways, further suggests that lipid metabolic disorders may play a key role in the development of ACLF. Compared with the NC group, the expressions of thrombospondin 1 (THBS1), MERTK, semaphorin 6B (SEMA6B), and PPAR γ (PPARG) genes are significantly increased in the ACLF group, and these four genes are closely related to innate immune response, adaptive immune response, complement activation, fatty acid oxidation, and reactive oxygen species metabolism, suggesting a virus-based immune metabolic disorder [179].

10.2. Prospects of Application of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing in ACLF

While transcriptomics can assess immunity and metabolism during ACLF, it may obscure the key contribution of individual cell populations, while single-cell RNA sequencing can understand the role of single-cell population in ACLF by classifying each cell into different subpopulations based on DEGs.

The application of single-cell RNA sequencing technology in a variety of diseases is conducive to a deeper understanding of diseases and more effective treatment. Its application in the liver can provide a framework for understanding the cellular basis of human liver functions and diseases [180]. It has revealed different subsets of liver nonparenchymal cells and highly specific gene expression pathways in liver fibrosis, NAFLD, and other pathological states, which is helpful to better guide the diagnosis and treatment of the liver diseases [181]. For example, it shows a new TREM2⁺CD9⁺ macrophage subpopulation in human cirrhosis, refines the definition of endothelial subsets, and proposes new therapeutic targets for cirrhosis [182]. It also shows that alpha-smooth muscle actin, a key marker of HSC activation, is only present in a subset of activated myofibroblasts, and S100A6 is a novel universal marker of activated myofibroblasts in liver fibrosis [183]. In addition, Trem2⁺ macrophages are termed “NASH-associated macrophages” by single-cell RNA sequencing technology in NASH mice [184]. The proportion of cells in chronic liver disease can also be measured using single-cell RNA sequencing data from healthy liver and peripheral immune cells, and the role of different cell types in each liver disease can be predicted based on large amounts of RNA sequencing data [185].

By application of single-cell RNA sequencing technology in acute liver failure (ALF) mice, it shows that new subpopulations of stellate cells, endothelial cells, KCs, monocytes, and neutrophils, along with their complex intercellular interactions, contribute to the development of ALF. The hepatic stellate cells are divided into four different populations (Lrat^high quiescent, Col1a1-positive fibrotic, Acta2-positive ALF-activated, and cycling stellate cells); the endothelial cell population is defined as three subpopulations and ALF-activated endothelial cells; Kupffer cells are identified as one quiescent and one ALF-activated population. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of ALF-activated stellate cells finds terms associated with cell death and upregulated genes (Trp53, Cdkn1a, Timp1, and Ereg), which triggers cell cycle arrest and senescence. Gene Ontology term enrichment analysis of upregulated genes in ALF-activated endothelial cells reveals terms associated with gene expression and vascular remodeling. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of ALF-activated Kupffer cells reveals terms about chemotaxis, cell migration, immune response, and apoptosis. Two populations of Ly6C-positive monocytes are identified, and the gene expression heterogeneity in the main population reveals that one consists of monocyte homing to the liver and the other induction of MHCII complex gene expression. Two neutrophil subpopulations are found; the smaller group is the proinflammatory subtype, participating in the regulation of the antioxidant transcriptional program. It also reveals that the activation of stellate cells, endothelial cells, and KCs during ALF is related with a common MYC-dependent transcription program, which is regulated by the gut microbiome through Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling. In humans, it shows that the MYC expression is upregulated in the liver of ALF transplant recipients compared to healthy donors [186].

Currently, single-cell RNA sequencing is beginning to be used in ACLF, it can be used to classify various immune cells in ACLF to study the role of various immune cell subpopulations in the occurrence and development of ACLF, and single-cell RNA sequencing reveals a panel of apoptotic and dysfunctional lymphatic endothelial cells as a result of secreted phosphoprotein 1 released by infiltrating monocytes/macrophages, which is closely related to the significant reduction of intrahepatic lymphatic vessels in HBV-ACLF patients [187]. However, this is only the beginning, as the sample size of ACLF increases and the incorporation of single-cell RNA sequencing into other functional assays will greatly improve our understanding of ACLF.

11. Prognosis

The prognosis of ACLF is closely related to infection and severity. ACLF can be divided into three grades according to the number of organ failure: ACLF-1 represents single renal failure or single nonrenal organ failure, ACLF-2 represents failure of two organs, and ACLF-3 represents failure of three to six organs [188]. The survival rate of mild ACLF, including ACLF-1 and ACLF-2, decreases significantly with infection, while infection has no significant effect on the prognosis of severe ACLF, such as ACLF-3 [15].

There are also many prognostic predictors of ACLF. The P5 score, a prognostic score that includes plasminogen levels, the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy, age, the international normalized ratio, and total bilirubin, is a promising prognostic score for HBV-ACLF [189]. In addition, macrophage secretions, such as sCD163 and macrophage inflammatory protein 3α, can be used as prognostic indicators of ACLF [190, 191]. What is more, some odd type predictors, such as neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), can also predict ACLF mortality [192]. NLR scores of ≥3 are associated with low mortality; however, NLR scores of >6 are associated with higher mortality [26].

12. Conclusion

ACLF is a syndrome of acute liver deterioration induced by precipitating events (especially alcoholic and hepatitis B) in patients with cirrhosis or noncirrhotic chronic liver disease, leading to failure of two or more organs, accompanied by short-term high mortality (Figure 1). ACLF is usually initiated by hepatic inflammation (Figure 2). The persistence of hepatic inflammation can develop into systemic inflammation, and macrophages play a leading role in this process. They could secrete a large number of cytokines and recruit various immune cells, leading to liver and systemic inflammation. Among the mediators of inflammation, the proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) are involved in the occurrence of liver injury, while G-CSF improves liver function and survival in ACLF. As the disease progresses, it is also associated with immunosuppressive and some phenotypic changes of immune cells that play a major role in the process; for example, monocyte and macrophage show a decrease in the HLA-DR expression and an increase in the MERTK expression. What is more, during the development of ACLF, immunometabolism (mitochondrial dysfunction, AAs, and lipid metabolism disorder) and microorganisms (bacterial translocation and gut-liver axis) play an important role in it. Based on the detailed study of the development of ACLF, we summarize the general treatment and immunotherapy for different stages of ACLF (Figure 3). PBMC transcriptome analysis of HBV-ACLF suggests that viral, immune, and metabolic processes play a central role in the biological process network from ACHD to ACLF. And single-cell RNA sequencing reveals a panel of apoptotic and dysfunctional lymphatic endothelial cells as a result of secreted phosphoprotein 1 released by infiltrating monocytes/macrophages in HBV-ACLF patients, and we prospect further application of single-cell RNA sequencing in ACLF (Figure 4). Finally, the prognosis of ACLF is closely related to infection and severity, and the P5 score can be used to predict the prognosis of ACLF.

Figure 2

The initiation of hepatic inflammation. Bacteria, HBV, alcohol, and other external factors lead to hepatocyte necrosis through regulatory proteins such as RIPK3 and MLKL, and DAMPs produced by them are recognized by DAMP receptors such as TLR4, TLR9, P2X7, and RAGE expressed by macrophages/KCs. Or PAMPs produced by various pathogens, recognized by PRRs expressed by macrophages/KCs. Macrophages/KCs can secrete reactive oxygen species (ROS), proinflammatory cytokines, and chemokines; enhance inflammatory signals; and recruit other immune cells to the liver, speeding up the inflammatory process.

Figure 3

Mechanism by which the immune system and microorganisms jointly promote ACLF formation. DAMPs produced by damaged liver cells or PAMPs produced by pathogens are recognized by PRRs on macrophages/KCs, which are activated and release inflammatory factors and chemokines, and recruit neutrophils and monocytes. Along with BMSCs, DCs are activated, and NK cells, T cells, and B cells are consumed, inducing systemic inflammation. Various changes of cell surface factor and regulatory factor, immune metabolic disorders, and liver bile secretion decreased; regulation of TH17/Treg obstacle, late performance for immunosuppression and abnormal lipid metabolism, and the role of short-chain fatty acids regulate intestinal function decline, the intestinal barrier damage, and gut bacteria translocation, aggravating infection, and liver cell damage are aggravating, forming a vicious cycle.

(a)

(b)

Abbreviations

ACLF:	Acute-on-chronic liver failure
KCs:	Kupffer cells
PAMPs:	Pathogen-associated molecular patterns
DAMPs:	Damage-associated molecular patterns
PRRs:	Pattern recognition receptors
DCs:	Dendritic cells
HBV-ACLF:	Hepatitis B virus-associated ACLF
Tregs:	Regulatory T cells
CHB:	Chronic hepatitis B
EASL-CLIF:	European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure Consortium
APASL:	Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver
AD:	Acute decompensation
PBMCs:	Peripheral blood mononuclear cells
LPS:	Lipopolysaccharide
SIRS:	The systemic inflammatory response syndrome
CARS:	Compensatory anti-inflammatory responses
TLR:	Toll-like receptor
ROS:	Reactive oxygen species
HSECs:	Hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells
MoMFs:	Monocyte-derived macrophages
GM-CSF:	Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
G-CSF:	Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
mDCs, pDCs:	Myeloid and plasmacytoid DCs
Tim-3:	T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing molecule-3
RES:	Reticuloendothelial system
MERTK:	MER tyrosine kinase
M-MDSCs:	Monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells
HIF1A-AS1:	Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha-antisense RNA 1
NGAL:	Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin
fMLP:	fMet-Leu-Phe
MoDCs:	Monocyte-derived dendritic cells
NCRs:	Natural cytotoxicity receptors
T/M:	CD3⁺ cells to monocytes
mtDNA:	Mitochondrial DNA
ATP:	Adenosine triphosphate
TCA:	Citric acid
AAs:	Amino acids
HDL:	High-density lipoprotein
LPC:	Lysophosphatidylcholine
PUFA:	Polyunsaturated fatty acid
LA:	Linoleic acid
PGE2:	Prostaglandin E2
NAFLD:	Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
SCFAs:	Short-chain fatty acids
GALT:	Gut-associated lymphoid tissue
IgA:	Immunoglobulin A
ALSS:	Artificial liver support system
LT:	Liver transplantation
IPA:	Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis
sAH:	Severe alcoholic hepatitis
AKI:	Acute kidney injury
SBP:	Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
MSCs:	Mesenchymal stem cells
HSA:	Human serum albumin
HMGB1:	High mobility group box-1
PGC-1α:	Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1α
LXR:	The liver X receptor
FMT:	Fecal microbial transplantation
NASH:	Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
ACHD:	Acute-on-chronic hepatic dysfunction
BTM:	Blood transcriptional module
DEGs:	Differentially expressed genes
NC:	Normal controls
THBS1:	Thrombospondin 1
SEMA6B:	Semaphorin 6B
PPARG:	PPAR γ
ALF:	Acute liver failure
NLR:	Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio.

Data Availability

No underlying data was collected or produced in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

KK wrote the manuscript and designed the figures. GL and ZF edited and revised the manuscript. XS, GT, and YZ gave good ideas during the process. All authors contributed to manuscript revision and read and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

We thank the financial support of the Foundation of Department of Finance of Jilin Province (2018SCZWSZX-042, JLSWSRCZX2021-026, and JLSWSRCZX2020-045).

References

O. Krenkel and F. Tacke, “Liver macrophages in tissue homeostasis and disease,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 306–321, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Strnad, F. Tacke, A. Koch, and C. Trautwein, “Liver - guardian, modifier and target of sepsis,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 55–66, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Heymann and F. Tacke, “Immunology in the liver--from homeostasis to disease,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 88–110, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Brempelis and I. N. Crispe, “Infiltrating monocytes in liver injury and repair,” Clinical & Translational Immunology, vol. 5, no. 11, article e113, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Triantafyllou, K. J. Woollard, M. J. W. McPhail, C. G. Antoniades, and L. A. Possamai, “The role of monocytes and macrophages in acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Hensley and J. C. Deng, “Acute on chronic liver failure and immune dysfunction: a mimic of sepsis,” Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 588–597, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Laleman, J. Claria, S. Van der Merwe, R. Moreau, and J. Trebicka, “Systemic inflammation and acute-on-chronic liver failure: too much, not enough,” Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 2018, Article ID 1027152, 10 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Moreau, R. Jalan, P. Gines et al., “Acute-on-chronic liver failure is a distinct syndrome that develops in patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis,” Gastroenterology, vol. 144, no. 7, pp. 1426–1437.e9, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Jalan, F. Saliba, M. Pavesi et al., “Development and validation of a prognostic score to predict mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1038–1047, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Bajaj, J. G. O'Leary, K. R. Reddy et al., “Survival in infection-related acute-on-chronic liver failure is defined by extrahepatic organ failures,” Hepatology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 250–256, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Wu, J. Li, L. Shao et al., “Development of diagnostic criteria and a prognostic score for hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Gut, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 2181–2191, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Jalan, C. Yurdaydin, J. S. Bajaj et al., “Toward an improved definition of acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Gastroenterology, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 4–10, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Sarin, APASL ACLF Research Consortium (AARC) for APASL ACLF working Party, A. Choudhury et al., “Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific association for the study of the liver (APASL): an update,” Hepatology International, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 353–390, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Casulleras, I. W. Zhang, C. Lopez-Vicario, and J. Claria, “Leukocytes, systemic inflammation and immunopathology in acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Cells, vol. 9, no. 12, p. 2632, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fernández, J. Acevedo, R. Wiest et al., “Bacterial and fungal infections in acute-on-chronic liver failure: prevalence, characteristics and impact on prognosis,” Gut, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 1870–1880, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Arroyo, R. Moreau, P. S. Kamath et al., “Acute-on-chronic liver failure in cirrhosis,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers, vol. 2, no. 1, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Mahmud, D. E. Kaplan, T. H. Taddei, and D. S. Goldberg, “Incidence and mortality of acute-on-chronic liver failure using two definitions in patients with compensated cirrhosis,” Hepatology, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 2150–2163, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Moreau, “The pathogenesis of ACLF: the inflammatory response and immune function,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 133–140, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Gandoura, E. Weiss, P. E. Rautou et al., “Gene- and exon-expression profiling reveals an extensive LPS-induced response in immune cells in patients with cirrhosis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 936–948, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Cholongitas, M. Senzolo, D. Patch, K. Kwong, V. Nikolopoulou, and G. Leandro, “Risk factors, sequential organ failure assessment and model for end-stage liver disease scores for predicting short term mortality in cirrhotic patients admitted to intensive care unit,” Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 883–893, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Kubes and W. Z. Mehal, “Sterile inflammation in the liver,” Gastroenterology, vol. 143, no. 5, pp. 1158–1172, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. L. Woolbright and H. Jaeschke, “The impact of sterile inflammation in acute liver injury,” Journal of Clinical and Translational Research, vol. 3, Supplement 1, pp. 170–188, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bernardi, R. Moreau, P. Angeli, B. Schnabl, and V. Arroyo, “Mechanisms of decompensation and organ failure in cirrhosis: from peripheral arterial vasodilation to systemic inflammation hypothesis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1272–1284, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Clària, R. E. Stauber, M. J. Coenraad et al., “Systemic inflammation in decompensated cirrhosis: characterization and role in acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Hepatology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1249–1264, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Trebicka, A. Amoros, C. Pitarch et al., “Addressing profiles of systemic inflammation across the different clinical phenotypes of acutely decompensated cirrhosis,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 10, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Khanam and S. Kottilil, “Abnormal innate immunity in acute-on-chronic liver failure: immunotargets for therapeutics,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 11, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Ginhoux, J. L. Schultze, P. J. Murray, J. Ochando, and S. K. Biswas, “New insights into the multidimensional concept of macrophage ontogeny, activation and function,” Nature Immunology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 34–40, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Xue, S. V. Schmidt, J. Sander et al., “Transcriptome-based network analysis reveals a spectrum model of human macrophage activation,” Immunity, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 274–288, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Sarin and A. Choudhury, “Acute-on-chronic liver failure: terminology, mechanisms and management,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 131–149, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. Possamai, M. R. Thursz, J. A. Wendon, and C. G. Antoniades, “Modulation of monocyte/macrophage function: a therapeutic strategy in the treatment of acute liver failure,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 439–445, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Murray, J. E. Allen, S. K. Biswas et al., “Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines,” Immunity, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Arango Duque and A. Descoteaux, “Macrophage cytokines: involvement in immunity and infectious diseases,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 5, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Ogle, C. E. Segar, S. Sridhar, and E. A. Botchwey, “Monocytes and macrophages in tissue repair: Implications for immunoregenerative biomaterial design,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 241, no. 10, pp. 1084–1097, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Wynn, A. Chawla, and J. W. Pollard, “Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis and disease,” Nature, vol. 496, no. 7446, pp. 445–455, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Solé, E. Solà, M. Morales-Ruiz et al., “Characterization of inflammatory response in acute-on-chronic liver failure and relationship with prognosis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. G. Antoniades, W. Khamri, R. D. Abeles et al., “Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor: a pivotal mediator of anti-inflammatory responses in acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure,” Hepatology, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1564–1576, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang and P. Kubes, “A reservoir of mature cavity macrophages that can rapidly invade visceral organs to affect tissue repair,” Cell, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 668–678, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Mantovani, C. A. Dinarello, M. Molgora, and C. Garlanda, “Interleukin-1 and related cytokines in the regulation of inflammation and immunity,” Immunity, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 778–795, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. G. Antoniades, A. Quaglia, L. S. Taams et al., “Source and characterization of hepatic macrophages in acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure in humans,” Hepatology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 735–746, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. C. Borish and J. W. Steinke, “2. Cytokines and chemokines,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. S460–S475, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Xing, L. Li, H. Cao, and J. Huang, “Altered immune function of monocytes in different stages of patients with acute on chronic liver failure,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 184–188, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Y. Lu, T. G. Bird, L. Boulter et al., “Hepatic progenitor cells of biliary origin with liver repopulation capacity,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 971–983, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Simonetto, V. H. Shah, and P. S. Kamath, “Improving survival in ACLF: growing evidence for use of G-CSF,” Hepatology International, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 473–475, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Gustot, “Beneficial role of G-CSF in acute-on-chronic liver failure: effects on liver regeneration, inflammation/immunoparalysis or both?” Liver International, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 484–486, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Xiang, D. Feng, S. Hwang et al., “Interleukin-22 ameliorates acute-on-chronic liver failure by reprogramming impaired regeneration pathways in mice,” Journal Hepatology, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 736–745, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Medzhitov, D. S. Schneider, and M. P. Soares, “Disease tolerance as a defense strategy,” Science, vol. 335, no. 6071, pp. 936–941, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. O'Brien, J. N. Fullerton, K. A. Massey et al., “Immunosuppression in acutely decompensated cirrhosis is mediated by prostaglandin E2,” Nature Medicine, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 518–523, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Bernsmeier, O. T. Pop, A. Singanayagam et al., “Patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure have increased numbers of regulatory immune cells expressing the receptor tyrosine kinase MERTK,” Gastroenterology, vol. 148, no. 3, article e614, pp. 603–615.e14, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Selvapatt, A. Singanayagam, J. Wendon, and C. G. Antoniades, “Understanding infection susceptibility in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1363–1366, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Bernsmeier, A. Singanayagam, V. C. Patel, J. Wendon, and C. G. Antoniades, “Immunotherapy in the treatment and prevention of infection in acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Immunotherapy, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 641–654, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. X. Du, Y. Shi, Y. Yang, Y. Yu, H. G. Lou, and F. F. Lv, “DAMP molecular IL-33 augments monocytic inflammatory storm in hepatitis B-precipitated acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Liver International, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 229–238, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Berry, C. G. Antoniades, I. Carey et al., “Severity of the compensatory anti-inflammatory response determined by monocyte HLA-DR expression may assist outcome prediction in cirrhosis,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 453–460, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Bernsmeier, E. Triantafyllou, R. Brenig et al., “CD14(+) CD15(-) HLA-DR(-) myeloid-derived suppressor cells impair antimicrobial responses in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Gut, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1155–1167, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Korf, J. du Plessis, J. van Pelt, S. De Groote, D. Cassiman, and L. Verbeke, “Inhibition of glutamine synthetase in monocytes from patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure resuscitates their antibacterial and inflammatory capacity,” Gut, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 1872–1883, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. H. Zhao, Y. Shi, H. Zhao, W. Wu, and J. F. Sheng, “Acute-on-chronic liver failure in chronic hepatitis B: an update,” Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 341–350, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wu, J. Ding, Q. Sun, K. Zhou, W. Zhang, and Q. Du, “Long noncoding RNA hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha-antisense RNA 1 promotes tumor necrosis factor-α-induced apoptosis through caspase 3 in Kupffer cells,” Medicine, vol. 97, no. 4, article e9483, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. P. Mookerjee, V. Stadlbauer, S. Lidder et al., “Neutrophil dysfunction in alcoholic hepatitis superimposed on cirrhosis is reversible and predicts the outcome,” Hepatology, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 831–840, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. J. Taylor, G. K. Manakkat Vijay, R. D. Abeles et al., “The severity of circulating neutrophil dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis is associated with 90-day and 1-year mortality,” Aliment Pharmacology Therapeutics, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 705–715, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Stephan, K. Yang, J. Tankovic et al., “Impairment of polymorphonuclear neutrophil functions precedes nosocomial infections in critically ill patients,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 315–322, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Nasioudis and S. S. Witkin, “Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and innate immune responses to bacterial infections,” Medical Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 204, no. 4, pp. 471–479, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Khanam, N. Trehanpati, P. Riese, A. Rastogi, C. A. Guzman, and S. K. Sarin, “Blockade of neutrophil's chemokine receptors CXCR1/2 abrogate liver damage in acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Frontiers Immunology, vol. 8, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Rolas, A. Boussif, E. Weiss et al., “NADPH oxidase depletion in neutrophils from patients with cirrhosis and restoration via toll-like receptor 7/8 activation,” Gut, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 1505–1516, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Garfia, I. Garcia-Ruiz, and J. A. Solis-Herruzo, “Deficient phospholipase C activity in blood polimorphonuclear neutrophils from patients with liver cirrhosis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 749–756, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Boussif, L. Rolas, E. Weiss, H. Bouriche, R. Moreau, and A. Perianin, “Impaired intracellular signaling, myeloperoxidase release and bactericidal activity of neutrophils from patients with alcoholic cirrhosis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1041–1048, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. A. Rajkovic and R. Williams, “Abnormalities of neutrophil phagocytosis, intracellular killing and metabolic activity in alcoholic cirrhosis and hepatitis,” Hepatology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 252–262, 1986.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Khanam, N. Trehanpati, V. Garg et al., “Altered frequencies of dendritic cells and IFN-gamma-secreting T cells with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy in acute-on- chronic liver failure,” Liver International, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 505–513, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhao, J. Y. Zhang, H. W. Yu et al., “Improved survival ratios correlate with myeloid dendritic cell restoration in acute-on-chronic liver failure patients receiving methylprednisolone therapy,” Cellular Molecular Immunology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 417–422, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bao, J. Zheng, N. Li et al., “Role of interleukin-23 in monocyte-derived dendritic cells of HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure and its correlation with the severity of liver damage,” Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 147–155, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Liu, X. Duan, Z. Wan et al., “Lower number and decreased function of natural killer cells in hepatitis B virus related acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 605–613, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zou, T. Chen, M. Han et al., “Increased killing of liver NK cells by Fas/Fas ligand and NKG2D/NKG2D ligand contributes to hepatocyte necrosis in virus-induced liver failure,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 466–475, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, W. Wang, C. Shen et al., “NKG2D modulates aggravation of liver inflammation by activating NK cells in HBV infection,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 88, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Chen, L. Zhu, Y. Zhou et al., “KCTD9 contributes to liver injury through NK cell activation during hepatitis B virus-induced acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 207–216, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. J. Markwick, A. Riva, J. M. Ryan et al., “Blockade of PD1 and TIM3 restores innate and adaptive immunity in patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis,” Gastroenterology, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 590–602.e10, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Khamri, R. D. Abeles, T. Z. Hou et al., “Increased expression of cytotoxic t-lymphocyte−associated protein 4 by T cells, induced by B7 in sera, reduces adaptive immunity in patients with acute liver failure,” Gastroenterology, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 263–276.e8, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Dong, Y. Gong, H. Zeng et al., “Imbalance between circulating CD4+ regulatory T and conventional T lymphocytes in patients with HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Liver International, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1517–1526, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Shi, J. Y. Zhang, Z. Zeng, P. Tien, and F. S. Wang, “Skewed ratios between CD3⁺ T cells and monocytes are associated with poor prognosis in patients with HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 402, no. 1, pp. 30–36, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yang, P. Yi, L. Wei et al., “Phenotypes and clinical significance of circulating CD4⁺CD25⁺ regulatory T cells (Tregs) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF),” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 10, p. 193, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ye, J. Liu, Q. Lai et al., “Decreases in activated CD8⁺ T cells in patients with severe hepatitis B are related to outcomes,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 136–145, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Shen, W. Z. Yan, C. Y. Zhao et al., “Increased CD4⁺CD25⁺ regulatory T cells correlate with poor short-term outcomes in hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure patients,” Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 137–146, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Shen, S. Sun, J. Huang et al., “Dynamic changes of T cell receptor repertoires in patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Hepatology International, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Angajala, S. Lim, J. B. Phillips et al., “Diverse roles of mitochondria in immune responses: novel insights into immuno-metabolism,” Frontiers in immunology, vol. 9, p. 1605, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Mathis and S. E. Shoelson, “Immunometabolism: an emerging frontier,” Nature reviews Immunology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 81–83, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ott, V. Gogvadze, S. Orrenius, and B. Zhivotovsky, “Mitochondria, oxidative stress and cell death,” Apoptosis, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 913–922, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Aon, N. Bhatt, and S. C. Cortassa, “Mitochondrial and cellular mechanisms for managing lipid excess,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 5, p. 282, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. W. Zhang, A. Curto, C. Lopez-Vicario et al., “Mitochondrial dysfunction governs immunometabolism in leukocytes of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 93–106, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. L. Mills, B. Kelly, and L. A. J. O'Neill, “Mitochondria are the powerhouses of immunity,” Nature Immunology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 488–498, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Goetze, S. Walenta, M. Ksiazkiewicz, L. A. Kunz-Schughart, and W. Mueller-Klieser, “Lactate enhances motility of tumor cells and inhibits monocyte migration and cytokine release,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 453–463, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Ratter, H. M. M. Rooijackers, G. J. Hooiveld et al., “In vitro and in vivo effects of lactate on metabolism and cytokine production of human primary PBMCs and monocytes,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 9, p. 2564, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Zaccherini, F. Aguilar, P. Caraceni et al., “Assessing the role of amino acids in systemic inflammation and organ failure in patients with ACLF,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 1117–1131, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Claria, R. Moreau, F. Fenaille et al., “Orchestration of tryptophan-kynurenine pathway, acute decompensation, and acute-on-chronic liver failure in cirrhosis,” Hepatology, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 1686–1701, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Newsholme, J. Procopio, M. M. Lima, T. C. Pithon-Curi, and R. Curi, “Glutamine and glutamate--their central role in cell metabolism and function,” Cell Biochemistry and Function, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Trieb, F. Rainer, V. Stadlbauer et al., “HDL-related biomarkers are robust predictors of survival in patients with chronic liver failure,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 113–120, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Claria, A. Curto, R. Moreau et al., “Untargeted lipidomics uncovers lipid signatures that distinguish severe from moderate forms of acutely decompensated cirrhosis☆,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 1116–1127, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Moreau, J. Claria, F. Aguilar et al., “Blood metabolomics uncovers inflammation-associated mitochondrial dysfunction as a potential mechanism underlying ACLF,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 688–701, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. B. Cullberg, J. Ø. Larsen, S. B. Pedersen, and B. Richelsen, “Effects of LPS and dietary free fatty acids on MCP-1 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and macrophages in vitro,” Nutrition & diabetes, vol. 4, no. 3, article e113, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Csak, M. Ganz, J. Pespisa, K. Kodys, A. Dolganiuc, and G. Szabo, “Fatty acid and endotoxin activate inflammasomes in mouse hepatocytes that release danger signals to stimulate immune cells,” Hepatology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 133–144, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fernandez, J. Claria, A. Amoros et al., “Effects of albumin treatment on systemic and portal hemodynamics and systemic inflammation in patients with decompensated cirrhosis,” Gastroenterology, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 149–162, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Garcia-Martinez, N. Santoro, Y. Chen et al., “Hepatocyte mitochondrial DNA drives nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by activation of TLR9,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 859–864, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Bellot, R. Frances, and J. Such, “Pathological bacterial translocation in cirrhosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis and clinical implications,” Liver International, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Garcia-Tsao, A. Albillos, G. E. Barden, and A. B. West, “Bacterial translocation in acute and chronic portal hypertension,” Hepatology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1081–1085, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Lozano-Ruiz, V. Bachiller, I. Garcia-Martinez et al., “Absent in melanoma 2 triggers a heightened inflammasome response in ascitic fluid macrophages of patients with cirrhosis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 64–71, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Michelena, J. Altamirano, J. G. Abraldes et al., “Systemic inflammatory response and serum lipopolysaccharide levels predict multiple organ failure and death in alcoholic hepatitis,” Hepatology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 762–772, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Hietbrink, M. G. Besselink, W. Renooij et al., “Systemic inflammation increases intestinal permeability during experimental human endotoxemia,” Shock, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 374–378, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. H. Tranah, L. A. Edwards, B. Schnabl, and D. L. Shawcross, “Targeting the gut-liver-immune axis to treat cirrhosis,” Gut, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 982–994, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Tilg, P. D. Cani, and E. A. Mayer, “Gut microbiome and liver diseases,” Gut, vol. 65, pp. 2035–2044, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Tripathi, J. Debelius, D. A. Brenner et al., “The gut-liver axis and the intersection with the microbiome,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 397–411, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Worlicek, K. Knebel, H. J. Linde et al., “Splanchnic sympathectomy prevents translocation and spreading of E coli but not S aureus in liver cirrhosis,” Gut, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 1127–1134, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. M. Bauer, H. Schwacha, B. Steinbruckner et al., “Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in human cirrhosis is associated with systemic endotoxemia,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 2364–2370, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Trebicka, J. Macnaughtan, B. Schnabl, D. L. Shawcross, and J. S. Bajaj, “The microbiota in cirrhosis and its role in hepatic decompensation,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 75, Supplement 1, pp. S67–S81, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Shao, Z. Ling, D. Chen, Y. Liu, F. Yang, and L. Li, “Disorganized gut microbiome contributed to liver cirrhosis progression: a meta-omics-based study,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 9, p. 3166, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Albillos, A. de Gottardi, and M. Rescigno, “The gut-liver axis in liver disease: pathophysiological basis for therapy,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 558–577, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Chen, P. Starkel, J. R. Turner, S. B. Ho, and B. Schnabl, “Dysbiosis-induced intestinal inflammation activates tumor necrosis factor receptor I and mediates alcoholic liver disease in mice,” Hepatology, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 883–894, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ubeda, M. Lario, L. Munoz et al., “Obeticholic acid reduces bacterial translocation and inhibits intestinal inflammation in cirrhotic rats,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1049–1057, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. D. Wang, W. D. Chen, D. D. Moore, and W. Huang, “FXR: a metabolic regulator and cell protector,” Cell Research, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1087–1095, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sorribas, M. O. Jakob, B. Yilmaz et al., “FXR modulates the gut-vascular barrier by regulating the entry sites for bacterial translocation in experimental cirrhosis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 71, pp. 1126–1140, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Inagaki, A. Moschetta, Y. K. Lee et al., “Regulation of antibacterial defense in the small intestine by the nuclear bile acid receptor,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, pp. 3920–3925, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Hang, D. Paik, L. Yao et al., “Bile acid metabolites control T_H17 and T_reg cell differentiation,” Nature, vol. 576, no. 7785, pp. 143–148, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Brandl, P. Hartmann, L. J. Jih et al., “Dysregulation of serum bile acids and FGF19 in alcoholic hepatitis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 396–405, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Peng, Z. R. Li, R. S. Green, I. R. Holzman, and J. Lin, “Butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by facilitating tight junction assembly via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in Caco-2 cell monolayers,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 139, no. 9, pp. 1619–1625, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Park, M. Kim, S. G. Kang et al., “Short-chain fatty acids induce both effector and regulatory T cells by suppression of histone deacetylases and regulation of the mTOR-S6K pathway,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 80–93, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. F. Assimakopoulos, A. C. Tsamandas, G. I. Tsiaoussis et al., “Altered intestinal tight junctions' expression in patients with liver cirrhosis: a pathogenetic mechanism of intestinal hyperpermeability,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 439–446, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Reboldi, T. I. Arnon, L. B. Rodda, A. Atakilit, D. Sheppard, and J. G. Cyster, “IgA production requires B cell interaction with subepithelial dendritic cells in Peyer's patches,” Science, vol. 352, no. 6287, article aaf4822, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Pabst, V. Cerovic, and M. Hornef, “Secretory IgA in the coordination of establishment and maintenance of the microbiota,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 287–296, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bartoletti, M. Baldassarre, M. Domenicali et al., “Prognostic Role of bacterial and fungal infections in patients with liver cirrhosis with and without acute-on-chronic liver failure: a prospective 2-center study,” Open Forum Infectious Diseases, vol. 7, no. 11, article ofaa453, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fernandez, P. Tandon, J. Mensa, and G. Garcia-Tsao, “Antibiotic prophylaxis in cirrhosis: good and bad,” Hepatology, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 2019–2031, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Wiest, A. Krag, and A. Gerbes, “Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: recent guidelines and beyond,” Gut, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 297–310, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Juanola, I. Gomez-Hurtado, P. Zapater et al., “Selective intestinal decontamination with norfloxacin enhances a regulatory T cell-mediated inflammatory control mechanism in cirrhosis,” Liver International, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1811–1820, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Philips and S. K. Sarin, “Potent antiviral therapy improves survival in acute on chronic liver failure due to hepatitis B virus reactivation,” World J Gastroenterol, vol. 20, no. 43, pp. 16037–16052, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yang, G. Chen, X. Chen, H. Zhang, D. Jiang, and G. Yang, “Initial combination anti-viral therapy with lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil decreases short-term fatality rate of hepatitis-B-virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Virology Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 97, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Garg, S. K. Sarin, M. Kumar, V. Garg, B. C. Sharma, and A. Kumar, “Tenofovir improves the outcome in patients with spontaneous reactivation of hepatitis B presenting as acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Hepatology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 774–780, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Verma, S. Singh, S. Taneja et al., “Invasive fungal infections amongst patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure at high risk for fungal infections,” Liver International, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 503–513, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lang, Y. Duan, J. Liu et al., “Intestinal fungal dysbiosis and systemic immune response to fungi in patients with alcoholic hepatitis,” Hepatology, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 522–538, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chen, Q. Yang, J. Huang, and L. Li, “Risk factors for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis and hospital mortality in acute-on-chronic liver failure patients: a retrospective-cohort study,” International Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1625–1631, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wang, C. Y. Zhao, J. Y. Zhou et al., “Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with HBV-related liver failure,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 661–667, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Gao, Q. Zhang, Y. Wu et al., “Improving survival of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients complicated with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 876, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Arroyo, R. Moreau, and R. Jalan, “Acute-on-chronic liver failure,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 382, no. 22, pp. 2137–2145, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Chen, Y. Y. Wang, C. Chen, J. Guan, H. H. Zhu, and Z. Chen, “The immunological roles in acute-on-chronic liver failure: an update,” Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 403–411, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Lucey, P. Mathurin, and T. R. Morgan, “Alcoholic hepatitis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 360, pp. 2758–2769, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Vuittonet, M. Halse, L. Leggio et al., “Pharmacotherapy for alcoholic patients with alcoholic liver disease,” American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, vol. 71, pp. 1265–1276, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Khanam and S. Kottilil, “Acute-on-chronic liver failure: pathophysiological mechanisms and management,” Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 8, article 752875, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Bernsmeier, C. G. Antoniades, and J. Wendon, “What's new in acute liver failure?” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1545–1548, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Louvet, S. Naveau, M. Abdelnour et al., “The Lille model: a new tool for therapeutic strategy in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis treated with steroids,” Hepatology, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1348–1354, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. G. Foncea, I. Sporea, R. Lupușoru et al., “Day-4 Lille score is a good prognostic factor and early predictor in assessing therapy response in patients with liver cirrhosis and severe alcoholic hepatitis,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 2338, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Philips, A. Pande, S. M. Shasthry et al., “Healthy donor fecal microbiota transplantation in steroid-ineligible severe alcoholic hepatitis: a pilot study,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 600–602, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Philips, P. Augustine, G. Padsalgi, R. Ahamed, A. Jose, and S. Rajesh, “Only in the darkness can you see the stars: severe alcoholic hepatitis and higher grades of acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 550-551, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kumar, S. Kainth, A. Choudhury et al., “Treatment with carvedilol improves survival of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: a randomized controlled trial,” Hepatology International, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 800–813, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Arora, R. Maiwall, V. Rajan et al., “terlipressin is superior to noradrenaline in the management of acute kidney injury in acute on chronic liver failure,” Hepatology, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 600–610, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Li, H. S. Chen, and S. L. Nyberg, “Extracorporeal liver support and liver transplant for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 153–160, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Liu, Q. Zhang, L. Liu et al., “Effect of artificial liver support system on short-term prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Artificial Organs, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. E434–E447, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Maiwall, M. Bajpai, A. K. Choudhury et al., “Therapeutic plasma-exchange improves systemic inflammation and survival in acute-on-chronic liver failure: a propensity-score matched study from AARC,” Liver International, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1083–1096, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Abdallah, M. Waleed, M. G. Bell et al., “Systematic review with meta-analysis: liver transplant provides survival benefit in patients with acute on chronic liver failure,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 222–232, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Artru, A. Louvet, I. Ruiz et al., “Liver transplantation in the most severely ill cirrhotic patients: a multicenter study in acute-on-chronic liver failure grade 3,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 708–715, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Sundaram, R. Jalan, T. Wu et al., “Factors associated with survival of patients with severe acute-on-chronic liver failure before and after liver transplantation,” Gastroenterology, vol. 156, no. 5, pp. 1381–1391.e3, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Thuluvath, A. J. Thuluvath, S. Hanish, and Y. Savva, “Liver transplantation in patients with multiple organ failures: feasibility and outcomes,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 1047–1056, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Sundaram, S. Kogachi, R. J. Wong et al., “Effect of the clinical course of acute-on-chronic liver failure prior to liver transplantation on post-transplant survival,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 481–488, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. L. Lin, J. F. Chen, W. H. Qiu et al., “Allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells for hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure: a randomized controlled trial,” Hepatology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 209–219, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Shi, Z. Zhang, R. Xu et al., “Human mesenchymal stem cell transfusion is safe and improves liver function in acute-on-chronic liver failure patients,” Stem Cells Translational Medicine, vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 725–731, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Casulleras, R. Flores-Costa, M. Duran-Guell et al., “Albumin internalizes and inhibits endosomal TLR signaling in leukocytes from patients with decompensated cirrhosis,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 12, no. 566, p. 12, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Merlot, D. S. Kalinowski, and D. R. Richardson, “Unraveling the mysteries of serum albumin-more than just a serum protein,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 5, p. 299, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Engelmann, M. Sheikh, S. Sharma et al., “Toll-like receptor 4 is a therapeutic target for prevention and treatment of liver failure,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 102–112, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Garg, H. Garg, A. Khan et al., “Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilizes CD34⁺ cells and improves survival of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Gastroenterology, vol. 142, no. 3, pp. 505–512.e1, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. K. Saha, M. A. Mahtab, S. M. F. Akbar et al., “Therapeutic implications of granulocyte colony stimulating factor in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: increased survival and containment of liver damage,” Hepatology International, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 540–546, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wu, Y. Wang, R. Jiang et al., “Ferroptosis in liver disease: new insights into disease mechanisms,” Cell Death Discovery, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 276, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Hou, X. Wei, J. Liang et al., “HMGB1-induced hepatocyte pyroptosis expanding inflammatory responses contributes to the pathogenesis of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF),” Journal of Inflammation Research, vol. Volume 14, pp. 7295–7313, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Ergen, F. Heymann, W. Al Rawashdeh et al., “Targeting distinct myeloid cell populations in vivo using polymers, liposomes and microbubbles,” Biomaterials, vol. 114, pp. 106–120, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Ju and F. Tacke, “Hepatic macrophages in homeostasis and liver diseases: from pathogenesis to novel therapeutic strategies,” Cellular & Molecular Immunology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 316–327, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Mossanen, O. Krenkel, C. Ergen et al., “Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2-positive monocytes aggravate the early phase of acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury,” Hepatology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1667–1682, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Marra and F. Tacke, “Roles for chemokines in liver disease,” Gastroenterology, vol. 147, no. 3, pp. 577–594.e1, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. S. Liu, H. Wang, X. Li et al., “α-ketoglutarate orchestrates macrophage activation through metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming,” Nature Immunology, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 985–994, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Aquilano, P. Vigilanza, S. Baldelli, B. Pagliei, G. Rotilio, and M. R. Ciriolo, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ co-activator 1α (PGC-1α) and sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) reside in mitochondria:,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 28, pp. 21590–21599, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Picaud, C. Wells, I. Felletar et al., “RVX-208, an inhibitor of BET transcriptional regulators with selectivity for the second bromodomain,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States America, vol. 110, no. 49, pp. 19754–19759, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Li, N. J. Spann, M. U. Kaikkonen et al., “NCoR repression of LXRs restricts macrophage biosynthesis of insulin- sensitizing omega 3 fatty acids,” Cell, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 200–214, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Sanders, D. J. Merenstein, G. Reid, G. R. Gibson, and R. A. Rastall, “Probiotics and prebiotics in intestinal health and disease: from biology to the clinic,” Nature reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 605–616, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Verbeke, R. Farre, J. Trebicka et al., “Obeticholic acid, a farnesoid X receptor agonist, improves portal hypertension by two distinct pathways in cirrhotic rats,” Hepatology, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 2286–2298, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Thévenot, C. Bureau, F. Oberti et al., “Effect of albumin in cirrhotic patients with infection other than spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. A randomized trial,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 822–830, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. M. Bass, K. D. Mullen, A. Sanyal et al., “Rifaximin treatment in hepatic encephalopathy,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, no. 12, pp. 1071–1081, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Moreau, L. Elkrief, C. Bureau et al., “Effects of long-term norfloxacin therapy in patients with advanced cirrhosis,” Gastroenterology, vol. 155, no. 6, pp. 1816–1827.e9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Garcia-Lezana, I. Raurell, M. Bravo et al., “Restoration of a healthy intestinal microbiota normalizes portal hypertension in a rat model of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis,” Hepatology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 1485–1498, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Li, X. Liang, J. Jiang et al., “PBMC transcriptomics identifies immune-metabolism disorder during the development of HBV-ACLF,” Gut, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 163–175, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. MacParland, J. C. Liu, X. Z. Ma et al., “Single cell RNA sequencing of human liver reveals distinct intrahepatic macrophage populations,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 4383, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Chu, J. D. Schilling, K. R. King, and A. E. Feldstein, “The power of single-cell analysis for the study of liver pathobiology,” Hepatology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 437–448, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Ramachandran, R. Dobie, J. R. Wilson-Kanamori et al., “Resolving the fibrotic niche of human liver cirrhosis at single-cell level,” Nature, vol. 575, no. 7783, pp. 512–518, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Krenkel, J. Hundertmark, T. P. Ritz, R. Weiskirchen, and F. Tacke, “Single cell RNA sequencing identifies subsets of hepatic stellate cells and myofibroblasts in liver fibrosis,” Cells, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 503, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Xiong, H. Kuang, S. Ansari et al., “Landscape of intercellular crosstalk in healthy and NASH liver revealed by single-cell secretome gene analysis,” Molecular Cell, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 644–660.e5, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kim, X. Wu, D. S. Allende, and L. E. Nagy, “Gene deconvolution reveals aberrant liver regeneration and immune cell infiltration in alcohol-associated hepatitis,” Hepatology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 987–1002, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Kolodziejczyk, S. Federici, N. Zmora et al., “Acute liver failure is regulated by MYC- and microbiome-dependent programs,” Nature Medicine, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1899–1911, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Zhang, H. Li, C. Zhou et al., “Single-cell RNA transcriptomics reveals the state of hepatic lymphatic endothelial cells in hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 2910, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Arroyo and R. Jalan, “Acute-on-chronic liver failure: definition, diagnosis, and clinical characteristics,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 109–116, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wu, S. Zhang, Z. Xie et al., “Plasminogen as a prognostic biomarker for HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 2069–2080, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Gronbaek, S. Rodgaard-Hansen, N. K. Aagaard, V. Arroyo, S. K. Moestrup, E. Garcia et al., “Macrophage activation markers predict mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis without or with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF),” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 64, pp. 813–822, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
G. A. Roth, P. Faybik, H. Hetz et al., “MCP-1 and MIP3-alpha serum levels in acute liver failure and molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) treatment: a pilot study,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 44, pp. 745–751, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Wu, H. Yan, H. Zhao et al., “Characteristics of systemic inflammation in hepatitis B-precipitated ACLF: differentiate it from No-ACLF,” Liver International, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 248–257, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Kai Kou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

567

Downloads

557

Citations