Therapeutic Efficacy of Flavonoids in Allergies: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

de Almeida Brasiel, Poliana Guiomar; Guimarães, Fernanda Verdini; Rodrigues, Patrícia Machado; Bou-Habib, Dumith Chequer; Carvalho, Vinicius de Frias

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8191253

Journal of Immunology Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 8191253 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8191253

Therapeutic Efficacy of Flavonoids in Allergies: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Poliana Guiomar de Almeida Brasiel,^1,2Fernanda Verdini Guimarães,¹Patrícia Machado Rodrigues,¹Dumith Chequer Bou-Habib,^2,3and Vinicius de Frias Carvalho^1,3

Academic Editor: Payam Behzadi

Received18 Jan 2022

Revised13 Mar 2022

Accepted15 Mar 2022

Published13 Apr 2022

Abstract

Objective. To assess the clinical efficacy of flavonoid supplements on allergic diseases. Design. Systematic review. Data Sources. MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from inception to September 2021. Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies. Eligible study designs were randomized controlled trials that investigated the effect of flavonoids applied to allergic diseases. Results. This review included 15 randomized controlled trials, including allergic rhinitis/cedar pollinosis (), asthma (), and atopic dermatitis (). A total of 990 participants aged 6 to 69 years were included in these studies. Globally, 12 studies (80%) revealed some benefits of flavonoids (isolate or combined with other compounds) in allergic patients, while three studies (20%) reported no statistically significant impact on symptom scores and/or lung function. No severe adverse events related to treatment were reported. According to the GRADE system, the outcomes evaluated were of low to moderate quality of evidence. Conclusions. Overall, this review suggests that the administration of flavonoids may provide a viable strategy for mitigating allergic symptoms. Future trials with high methodological quality are needed to establish definitive conclusions. This trial is registered with PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021237403.

1. Introduction

Allergic diseases are a set of conditions caused by aberrant immunoglobulin (Ig) E-mediated reactions to allergen exposure. Many allergic diseases, including asthma, allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, and atopic dermatitis, present multifactorial etiology and share similar risk factors [1, 2]. These diseases comprise an important cause of morbidity worldwide, causing a negative impact on the health and medical systems in both developed and emerging economies [3]. The estimated prevalence of allergic rhinitis was one in seven in U.S. adults and children (14% and 13%, respectively), 7% in Latin America, and 9% in the Asia-Pacific region [4]. According to the Global Asthma Report 2018, asthma affects as many as 339 million people worldwide and kills around 1,000 people every day [5]. Atopic dermatitis affects up to 20% of children and 10% of adults in high-income countries [6]. While there are efficient drugs widely used for the treatment of allergic diseases, conventional therapies do not often provide complete resolution of the symptoms and may present adverse effects associated with their continued use. Thus, new adjuvant therapies targeting the eliciting mechanisms of the allergic inflammatory response and able to improve the patient’s quality of life are needed [7].

The development and progression of allergic diseases are related to the exacerbated inflammatory response [8]; thus, some foods and nutrients endowed with anti-inflammatory activity, such as flavonoids, can be useful in the management of these diseases [9, 10]. Flavonoids belong to a class of plant secondary metabolites widely found in fruits and vegetables [11]. Due to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and anticarcinogenic properties, flavonoids are components of a variety of nutraceutical, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic applications [12]. Preclinical and clinical reports have shown the efficacy and safety of flavonoids [13], although high doses of these compounds could potentially have adverse effects, including kidney or liver changes and anemia [14, 15].

Flavonoids, including flavones, flavonols, flavanones, isoflavones, and anthocyanins, may act on allergic diseases. Thus, patients with allergic disorders could benefit from flavonoid therapy alone or in combination with antiallergic drugs [16]. In this way, to contribute to a better evaluation of current clinical studies, we performed a critical analysis of randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of flavonoids on allergic diseases. We also aimed to improve the quality of the reports and to prevent the spreading of methodological failures, which could compromise the development of future studies and efficient clinical approaches.

2. Methods

This systematic review was elaborated according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [17, 18], whose methods include data source and search, study selection, eligibility criteria, data extraction, analysis of results, risk of bias, and quality of evidence. The protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number: CRD42021237403).

2.1. Search Strategy

The bibliographic search was performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE (PubMed platform—https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed), Scopus (https://www.scopus.com), Embase (https://www.embase.com), and Web of Science (https://login.webofknowledge.com) to September 2021, admitting only randomized controlled trials. The keywords for the construction of the filters followed three criteria: allergy AND flavonoids AND randomized controlled trial (Supplementary file S1). The hierarchical distribution of the Medical Subject Headings (MESH) terms was the strategy used to develop the filter in the PubMed platform. We applied in the Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science platforms the same PubMed search strategy. Views, comments, notes, protocols, and unpublished studies were excluded.

No restrictions were imposed for language or date of publication. The bibliographies of the eligible studies were checked manually to find possible publications of interest. We also searched the site Clinicaltrials.gov for ongoing studies.

2.2. Selection of Studies

We included all the randomized controlled trials that evaluated the use of flavonoids either isolate or in combination with other compounds in allergic individuals—children and adults (population) compared to placebo (comparator). Prespecified eligibility and exclusion criteria were set using the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study design) strategy. The following exclusion criteria were used: (i) descriptive studies, such as annals of congresses, protocols, editorials, letters, case reports, and review works; (ii) animal studies; (iii) in vitro studies; and (iv) comparative and observational studies. Abstracts or unpublished reports were disregarded. Trials in which flavonoids were combined with prebiotics and/or probiotics were excluded due to their ability to alter the gut microbiota, influencing the immune system and the development of allergies [19, 20].

The evaluation of the eligibility of the studies was performed independently by two reviewers (P.G.A.B. and F.V.G.). In the case of disagreements, another group of reviewers (P.M.R.S., D.C.B-H., and V.F.C.) decided whether the study met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion or exclusion was verified by evaluating the full text of potentially relevant studies.

2.3. Extraction and Synthesis of Data

A detailed examination of the studies was carried out to evaluate the strength of the evidence and the validity of their inclusion in this review. Data extraction and compilation tables were developed according to the following information: (i) publication characteristics such as authors, year, and country; (ii) features of the participants, including clinical manifestation/allergic disease, sex, age, and number of participants, besides main types of the intervention, like the type of flavonoids, dose, and duration of treatment; and (iii) effects of flavonoids and the main outcomes. When essential information was absent, the authors were contacted by us to get it.

Clinical evaluation (symptoms), lung function, atopy (skin prick tests), and immune biomarkers (total and specific IgE serum concentrations) were also considered. The asthma score, allergic rhinitis symptoms, and skin lesions were presented as primary outcomes. The data were subsequently compared, and conflicting information was identified and corrected after discussion among the reviewers.

2.4. Risk of Bias and Quality of Evidence

The risk of bias was analyzed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) [21], updated versions for individually randomized parallel-group trial, and individually randomized crossover trial. The risk of bias was assessed in five distinct domains, with each answer leading to judgments of “low risk of bias,” “some concerns,” or “high risk of bias.” The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to decide the quality of evidence for each outcome and generate an evidence profile table [22]. The GRADEpro GDT web version was used to assess the quality of the evidence [23].

3. Results

3.1. Study Selection

Our search strategy identified 93 bibliographic citations, of which 20 were selected for full-text assessment. No other additional study was identified in the gray literature search or through the screening of included studies’ reference lists. We identified 15 randomized controlled trials comparing at least one flavonoid source with placebo and meeting the inclusion criteria. Of these, 5 were excluded for the following reasons: lack of methodological information () and presence of other concomitant treatment (). Figure 1 shows the flow diagram of the study selection process.

3.2. Study Characteristics

The selected 15 studies assessing the use of flavonoids in allergies were performed in 6 different countries, most of them in Japan (33.3%), followed by USA (20%), Iran (20%), Italy (13.3%), Canada (6.7%), and Thailand (6.7%). All studies were published in English. The articles investigated a variety of allergic conditions, including allergic rhinitis (), cedar pollinosis (), asthma (), and atopic dermatitis (). From 2004 to 2019, the 15 studies included a total of 990 participants, 498 in the intervention group and 476 in the control group. One trial is a crossover design with 16 subjects [24]. Individuals 6 to 69 years old were included in these studies. However, just two studies focused on the effects of flavonoids in allergic diseases of children and adolescents [25, 26]. In some trials, the age bracket has not been specified (, 26.6%), only the mean age. Regarding treatment duration, a variation of 3 days to 24 weeks was observed.

From these 15 articles, apple polyphenol was used in 2 trials [27, 28], and 2 studies were published by the same research group that assessed modified isoquercitrin, a quercetin glycoside [29, 30]. The commercial formulations Pycnogenol® [26, 31] and Lertal® [25], as well as several extracts such as from tomato [32], purple passion fruit [33], dodder seed [34], and shallot [35], were also evaluated. Soy isoflavone [36], silymarin [37], a combination of botanical products (Spanish needles (Bidens pilosa)), cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum), acerola (Malpighia glabra) [24], topical cream containing vitamin E, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), and grape seed procyanidins [38] complete the sources of flavonoids evaluated. The characteristics of all included studies are shown in Table 1.

3.3. Primary Outcomes

Flavonoids have been shown to be effective in the treatment of some allergic diseases, as demonstrated especially in symptom scores. Globally, 12 studies (80%) revealed some benefit of flavonoids (isolated or combined with other compounds) in allergic patients, while three studies (20%) reported no statistically significant impact in their findings. The symptom score was identified as a primary outcome; however, different scoring systems were employed. In general, the studies evaluated nasal symptoms, including itching, sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion, and ocular symptoms such as itching, hyperemia of conjunctiva, and tearing. The main scale used was a 4-point scale based on the symptoms, in which 0 = absent or irrelevant, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe.

Apple polyphenols decreased nasal symptoms, such as sneezing, compared with placebo [27]. A high dose of apple polyphenols (200 mg) led to the improvement of sneezing attacks and nasal discharge, and a low dose (50 mg) reduced sneezing attacks and swelling of the nasal turbinate scores after 4 weeks of the intake [28]. Enzymatically modified isoquercitrin (100 mg/day) significantly improved total ocular symptoms during the whole period (8 weeks) [30], as well as the total ocular symptom plus medication score in patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis [29]. Improvement of the ocular symptom score was also observed in the patients who received oral shallot supplement (3 g/day) in combination with cetirizine [35]. Lertal®, an oral food supplement containing Perilla frutescens (80 mg), quercetin (150 mg), and vitamin D3 (200 IU), led to a significant reduction in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis exacerbation in children of ages ranging 6–12 years [25].

The Pycnogenol®, a standardized bark extract of the French maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.), was evaluated in two trials—one with asthmatic patients and another with patients presenting allergic rhinitis. Pycnogenol treatment showed a positive effect on peak expiratory flow (PEF) and symptom scores compared to baseline in childhood asthma [26]. However, its use in individuals with allergic rhinitis was not able to significantly reduce total nasal and ocular symptom scores compared to placebo [31]. In addition, the purple passion fruit peel extract reduced the symptom score in asthmatic patients, including reduction in the prevalence of wheeze and shortness of breath, after 4 weeks of treatment, accompanied with an increase in the forced vital capacity (FVC) [33]. Following the investigation of the effects of flavonoids on asthma, soy isoflavone supplementation for 24 weeks did not significantly improve symptom scores (asthma symptoms utility index) and mean changes in prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV₁) [36].

In the case of atopic dermatitis, the treatment with whey associated with dodder seed extract improved skin moisture and elasticity compared to the placebo group [34]. Another work with atopic dermatitis showed no difference in the lesion skin area on the face and neck after topical cream containing vitamin E, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), and grape seed procyanidin treatment [38]. Figure 2 presents the percentage of improvement for each outcome of the included studies.

3.4. Quality of Life

Four reports assessed the degree of quality of life (QOL) [29, 30, 32, 36], two of them by using the Japanese allergic rhinitis QOL questionnaire (JRQLQ) [29, 30]. The JRQLQ comprises questions about rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal obstruction, nasal and ocular itching, lacrimation, general fatigue, irritability, depression, and difficulties with daily activities such as working, housekeeping, studying, reading, doing sports, going outdoors, sleeping, and having conversations [39]. Only one study identified a significant improvement in patients’ QOL in the treatment group (tomato extract) compared to the control [32].

3.5. Serum IgE and Cytokines

Only 4 trials presented results of serum IgE. Of these, three indicated no significant changes in total IgE [29, 32] and birch allergen IgE [31] during the study period. One trial showed a significant rise in mean IgE after treatment with silymarin [37]. Regarding cytokine levels (IL-4, IL-5, and IFN-γ), silymarin did not show any significant difference [37]. On the other hand, treatment with enzymatically modified isoquercitrin reduced serum levels of thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC), however did not alter the levels of IL-4, IL-5, IL-12, IL-13, and IFN-γ [30].

3.6. Adverse Events

Information on adverse events was reported in 14 of the 15 studies. Five trials described side effects in evaluated individuals. The major adverse effects described were gastrointestinal symptoms [28, 34, 35], irritant contact dermatitis [38], dizziness [31, 35], fatigue [35], headache [31, 35], and menstrual symptoms [36], however without significant differences between the groups.

3.7. Study Quality and Risk of Bias

Selected studies were evaluated using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) [21], as represented in Figure 3, considering the differences between parallel and crossover trials. An evidence profile according to GRADE for the included randomized trials is given in Table 2.

4. Discussion

We systematically reviewed the literature regarding flavonoid use in individuals with allergic diseases. We found 15 randomized controlled trials that evaluated at least 1 prespecified outcome, achieving a total of 990 participants. Although most studies had a low risk of bias, the quality of evidence was low to moderate grade given the small sample size and inconsistency of results. Despite limiting the strength of the present study’s conclusions, several important findings appeared.

Allergic rhinitis, including pollinosis, was the allergic condition most assessed between the trials, with emphasis on Japanese studies. In particular, the number of patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis has increased [40], which seems to influence the largest number of studies conducted in this country. An important point observed is the lack of a standard symptom scale. Although Okuda’s classification is widely used in Japanese studies, the application of different scales makes it difficult to compare different studies and summarize the results.

As observed in Table 1, different sources of flavonoids were evaluated, alone or in combination. Together, the results suggest that flavonoid use is beneficial in allergic diseases, such as allergic rhinitis, asthma, and atopic dermatitis, without causing serious adverse events. Nevertheless, the application of distinct interventions is a challenge in the compilation of studies for the same outcome. The flavonoids are widely found in dietary sources, including fruits, nuts, vegetables, and tea, with large variability depending on the cultivar, environmental factors, and preparation [14, 41]. The differences in bioavailability and absorption rates of diverse flavonoids are lacking in the included studies and need to be considered in the analysis of the results, because these pharmacokinetic parameters have an impact on health outcomes [42, 43]. These polyphenolic compounds are associated with a wide range of health benefits arising from their bioactive properties, such as anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antioxidant, cardiovascular benefit, neuroprotective, immunomodulatory, and antiviral properties [44]. These attributes drive flavonoids to medicinal use and development of functional products.

Due to immunomodulatory effects, several classes and sources of flavonoids were applied in subjects with allergic rhinitis/pollinosis, and 90% (9/10) of the studies identified some benefits associated with its use, such as the reduction of the symptoms. Nonetheless, the use of Pycnogenol® (100 mg/day), for 3 to 8 weeks prior to the birch pollen season, did not lead to significant improvement in nasal and ocular symptoms [31]. French maritime pine bark extract supplementation has already been studied under other pathophysiological conditions, as traumatic brain injury [45], urinary tract infections [46], osteoarthritis [47], among others [48] with different doses and duration, besides impact on clinical outcomes. The methodological limitations and imprecision lead to a low evidence level for this outcome, as can be seen in Table 2.

For asthma, a chronic airway inflammatory disease usually driven by the Th₂ subset of CD4⁺ T lymphocytes [49], 67% (2/3) of the trials showed improvement in symptom scores and lung function. When evaluating the effects of soy isoflavone, no significant differences were observed in lung function, symptoms, and quality of life after 24 weeks of treatment. The inconsistency in results generated a moderate level of evidence for asthma symptoms and lung function. It is worth mentioning that soy isoflavones can act with endocrine disruption, and there is controversy regarding its consumption, especially during critical periods of development [50]. In addition, the low dosage and bioavailability of dietary supplements may have contributed to the lack of effects.

Two studies investigated the effects of flavonoids in atopic dermatitis. The combination of whey and dodder seed extract improved skin moisture and elasticity [34]. However, topical cream containing vitamin E, epigallocatechin gallate, and grape seed procyanidins showed no significant differences between the two treatment groups [38]. The small sample size and population heterogeneity make comparison difficult and lead to loss of evidence quality for this outcome.

The included studies employed a variety of extraction techniques and manufacturing practices, which makes it difficult to determine the possible impacts of these inconsistencies on the bioavailability and quality of the supplements evaluated. Another challenge in this review is the heterogeneity of outcomes reported across studies. Differences in age of participants (stage of life), source, dose, and duration of supplementation varied widely across the different studies, making it difficult to group the results and impacting the quality of evidence. It is worth pointing out that it is not possible to attribute the beneficial effects of flavonoid intake alone, but to a set of nutrients and bioactive compounds that are part of a healthy diet [51].

The methodological limitations and high heterogeneity of the studies included in the systematic review weaken the evidence about the real benefits of flavonoid intervention. Small sample sizes, limited numbers of randomized controlled trials per condition, variation in outcome measures, and incomplete reporting make it difficult to quantitatively compare studies and lead to the impossibility of settling definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of flavonoid supplements for allergic diseases. Therefore, the findings of many of these trials need to be confirmed in larger and more rigorously designed clinical trials. The major strength of this work is that, to our knowledge, this is the first systematic review based on randomized controlled trials that summarize the efficacy of flavonoids on allergic diseases. Furthermore, in this study, we pointed out that the critical analysis following high methodological rigor can help to improve the quality of future reports and to assist in the clinical indication of flavonoid use in allergic diseases.

5. Conclusion

This systematic review found that different sources of flavonoids were associated with reduced symptoms in patients with allergic diseases. Although synthesized with low to moderate evidence quality, the findings suggested that flavonoid use is a viable strategy for mitigating allergic symptoms. Future research is needed to achieve the optimal dose, formulation, and duration of the treatment, as well as what is the best source of flavonoids. In this connection, more methodologically rigorous clinical trials are needed to generate quality clinical evidence about the use of flavonoids in the management of allergic diseases.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

PGAB coordinated contributions from the coauthors and wrote the final draft of the review. PGAB and FVG screened papers against eligibility criteria. PGAB analyzed and interpreted data. PGAB, FVG, PMRS, DCB-H, and VFC reviewed the final version of the review.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1: search strategy used on the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases. (Supplementary Materials)

References

R. J. Doll, N. I. Joseph, D. McGarry, D. Jhaveri, T. Sher, and R. Hostoffer, “Epidemiology of allergic diseases,” Allergy and Asthma, Cham, Springer, pp. 31–51, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bousquet, J. M. Anto, C. Bachert et al., “Allergic rhinitis,” Nature Reviews. Disease Primers, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 95, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Zuberbier, J. Lötvall, S. Simoens, S. V. Subramanian, and M. K. Church, “Economic burden of inadequate management of allergic diseases in the European Union: a GA2LEN review,” Allergy, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 1275–1279, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. O. Meltzer, M. S. Blaiss, R. M. Naclerio et al., “Burden of allergic rhinitis: allergies in America, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific adult surveys,” Allergy and Asthma Proceedings, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 113–141, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Global Asthma Network, The Global Asthma Report 2018, Auckland, New Zealand, 2018.
S. M. Langan, A. D. Irvine, and S. Weidinger, “Atopic dermatitis,” Lancet, vol. 396, no. 10247, pp. 345–360, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. Jung, Y.-J. Chung, Y.-S. Choi, P. S. Chung, and J.-H. Mo, “Clinical efficacy and safety of low-level laser therapy in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 772, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Galli, M. Tsai, and A. M. Piliponsky, “The development of allergic inflammation,” Nature, vol. 454, no. 7203, pp. 445–454, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. García-Montero, O. Fraile-Martínez, A. M. Gómez-Lahoz et al., “Nutritional components in Western diet versus Mediterranean diet at the gut microbiota-immune system interplay. Implications for health and disease,” Nutrients., vol. 13, no. 2, p. 699, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Arcusa, J. Á. Carrillo, R. Xandri-Martínez et al., “Effects of a fruit and vegetable-based nutraceutical on biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative status in the plasma of a healthy population: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, and randomized clinical trial,” Molecules, vol. 26, no. 12, p. 3604, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. N. Panche, A. D. Diwan, and S. R. Chandra, “Flavonoids: an overview,” J Nutr Sci., vol. 5, pp. 1–15, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kozlowska and D. Szostak-Wegierek, “Flavonoids–food sources, health benefits, and mechanisms involved,” Bioactive Molecules in Food, Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–27, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Khan, P. K. Deb, S. Priya et al., “Dietary flavonoids: cardioprotective potential with antioxidant effects and their pharmacokinetic, toxicological and therapeutic concerns,” Molecules, vol. 26, no. 13, p. 4021, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Corcoran, D. L. McKay, and J. B. Blumberg, “Flavonoid basics: chemistry, sources, mechanisms of action, and safety,” J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 176–189, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Galati and P. J. O’Brien, “Potential toxicity of flavonoids and other dietary phenolics: significance for their chemopreventive and anticancer properties,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 287–303, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Shakoor, J. Feehan, V. Apostolopoulos et al., “Immunomodulatory effects of dietary polyphenols,” Nutrients, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 728, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Liberati, D. G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff et al., “The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions : explanation and elaboration,” BMJ, vol. 339, p. b2700, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Page, M. K. JE, P. M. Bossuyt et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, vol. 2021, p. 372, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Brosseau, A. Selle, D. J. Palmer, S. L. Prescott, S. Barbarot, and M. Bodinier, “Prebiotics: mechanisms and preventive effects in allergy,” Nutrients, vol. 11, no. 8, p. 1841, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Eslamia, A. Baharb, M. Keikhac, M. Karbalaeid, N. M. Kobyliake, and B. Yousefi, “Probiotics function and modulation of the immune system in allergic diseases,” Allergol Immunopathol (Madr), vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 771–788, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Sterne, J. Savović, M. Page et al., “RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials,” BMJ, vol. 366, p. l4898, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Guyatt, A. D. Oxman, E. A. Akl et al., “GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction--GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 383–394, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
McMaster University and Evidence Prime, GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool [Software] [Internet]. 2021. Available from: gradepro.org.
J. Corren, M. Lemay, Y. Lin, L. Rozga, and R. K. Randolph, “Clinical and biochemical effects of a combination botanical product (ClearGuard™) for allergy: a pilot randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial,” Nutrition Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Marseglia, A. Licari, S. Leonardi et al., “A polycentric, randomized, parallel-group, study on Lertal®, a multicomponent nutraceutical, as preventive treatment in children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis : phase II,” Italian Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. H. S. Lau, S. K. Riesen, K. P. Truong, E. W. Lau, P. Rohdewald, and R. A. Barreta, “Pycnogenol as an adjunct in the management of childhood asthma,” The Journal of Asthma, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 825–832, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Kishi, M. Saito, T. Saito et al., “Clinical efficacy of apple polyphenol for treating cedar pollinosis,” Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 829–832, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Enomoto, T. Enomoto, T. Kanda, M. Ikeda, and Y. Dake, “Clinical effects of apple polyphenols on persistent allergic rhinitis: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled parallel arm study,” Journal of Investigational Allergology & Clinical Immunology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 283–289, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Hirano, M. Kawai, J. Arimitsu et al., “Preventative effect of a flavonoid, enzymatically modified isoquercitrin on ocular symptoms of Japanese cedar pollinosis,” Allergology International, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 373–382, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kawai, T. Hirano, J. Arimitsu et al., “Effect of enzymatically modified isoquercitrin, a flavonoid, on symptoms of Japanese cedar pollinosis: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial,” International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 149, no. 4, pp. 359–368, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wilson, M. Evans, N. Guthrie et al., “A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory study to evaluate the potential of Pycnogenol® for improving allergic rhinitis symptoms,” Phyther Res., vol. 24, pp. 1115–1119, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Yoshimura, T. Enomoto, Y. Dake et al., “An evaluation of the clinical efficacy of tomato extract for perennial allergic rhinitis,” Allergol Int [Internet]. Elsevier Masson SAS, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 225–230, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. R. Watson, S. Zibadi, H. Rafatpanah et al., “Oral administration of the purple passion fruit peel extract reduces wheeze and cough and improves shortness of breath in adults with asthma,” Nutrition Research, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 166–171, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mehrbani, R. Choopani, A. Fekri, M. Mehrabani, M. Mosaddegh, and M. Mehrabani, “The efficacy of whey associated with dodder seed extract on moderate- to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 172, pp. 325–332, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Arpornchayanon, S. Klinprung, S. Chansakaow et al., “Antiallergic activities of shallot (Allium ascalonicum L.) and its therapeutic effects in allergic rhinitis,” Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 18, pp. 1–8, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
L. J. Smith, R. Kalhan, R. A. Wise et al., “Effect of a soy isoflavone supplement on lung function and clinical outcomes in patients with poorly controlled asthma: a randomized clinical trial,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 313, no. 20, pp. 2033–2043, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bakhshaee, F. Jabbari, S. Hoseini et al., “Effect of silymarin in the treatment of allergic rhinitis,” Head & Neck Surgery, vol. 145, no. 6, pp. 904–909, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Patrizi, B. Raone, I. Neri et al., “Randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of MD2011001 cream in mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis of the face and neck in children, adolescents and adults,” The Journal of Dermatological Treatment, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 346–350, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Okuda, K. Ohkubo, M. Goto, Y. Okamoto, A. Konno, and K. Baba, “Japanese allergic rhinitis quality of life questionnaire,” Jpn J Allergol., vol. 52, pp. 21–56, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Okubo, Y. Kurono, K. Ichimura et al., “Japanese guidelines for allergic rhinitis 2020,” Allergology International, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 331–345, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Ren, Y. Nian, and C. A. Perussello, “Effect of storage, food processing and novel extraction technologies on onions flavonoid content: a review,” Food Research International, vol. 132, article 108953, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Manach, G. Williamson, C. Morand, A. Scalbert, and C. Rémésy, “Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailability studies,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 230S–242S, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Williamson and C. Manach, “Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. II. Review of 93 intervention studies,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 243S–255S, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Dias, D. C. G. A. Pinto, and A. M. S. Silva, “Plant flavonoids: chemical characteristics and biological activity,” Molecules, vol. 26, no. 17, p. 5377, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Malekahmadi, M. Shadnoush, S. M. Islam et al., “The effect of French maritime pine bark extract supplementation on inflammation, nutritional and clinical status in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial,” Phyther Res PTR., vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 5178–5188, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ledda, S. Hu, M. R. Cesarone et al., “Pycnogenol® supplementation prevents recurrent urinary tract infections/inflammation and interstitial cystitis,” Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2021, Article ID 9976299, 8 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Jessberger, P. Högger, F. Genest, D. M. Salter, and L. Seefried, “Cellular pharmacodynamic effects of Pycnogenol® in patients with severe osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled pilot study,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 537, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. U. Robertson, A. Schoonees, A. Brand, and J. Visser, “Pine bark (Pinusspp.) extract for treating chronic disorders,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2020, no. 9, article CD008294, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Froidure, J. Mouthuy, S. R. Durham, P. Chanez, Y. Sibille, and C. Pilette, “Asthma phenotypes and IgE responses,” The European Respiratory Journal, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 304–319, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Vieira, P. G. de Almeida Brasiel, M. S. Ferreira et al., “Maternal soybean diet during lactation alters breast milk composition and programs the lipid profile in adult male rat offspring,” Endocrine, vol. 60, pp. 272–281, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. R. Jacobs Jr. and L. C. Tapsell, “Food synergy: the key to a healthy diet,” The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 200–206, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Poliana Guiomar de Almeida Brasiel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

786

Downloads

613

Citations