TY - JOUR A2 - Rubboli, Andrea AU - Kim, Yong Hoon AU - Her, Ae-Young AU - Jeong, Myung Ho AU - Kim, Byeong-Keuk AU - Hong, Sung-Jin AU - Kim, Seunghwan AU - Ahn, Chul-Min AU - Kim, Jung-Sun AU - Ko, Young-Guk AU - Choi, Donghoon AU - Hong, Myeong-Ki AU - Jang, Yangsoo PY - 2020 DA - 2020/07/18 TI - Comparison of First- and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Prediabetes Based on the Hemoglobin A1c Level SP - 1710439 VL - 2020 AB - Objective. To compare major clinical outcomes after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with first-generation (1G) drug-eluting stents (DES) and second-generation (2G) DES in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and prediabetes. Background. Patients with prediabetes are associated with an increased incidence of coronary artery disease. The relative superiority of 1G- and 2G-DES in these patients is not well established. Methods. A total of 4997 patients with AMI and prediabetes were divided into two groups: the 1D-DES group (n = 726) and the 2G-DES group (n = 4271). The primary outcomes were the patient-oriented composite outcomes (POCOs) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), and any disease revascularization at 2-year follow-up. The secondary outcome was probable or definite stent thrombosis (ST). Results. After propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis, two PSM groups (698 pairs, n = 1396, C-statistics = 0.725) were generated. The cumulative incidence rates of POCOs (hazard ratio (HR): 1.467; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.068–2.015; p=0.018), any disease revascularization (HR: 2.259; 95% CI: 1.397–3.654; p=0.001), and ST (HR: 4.361; 95% CI: 1.243–15.30; p=0.021) in the 1G-DES group were significantly higher than those in the 2G-DES group. However, the cumulative incidence rates of all-cause death, cardiac death, and Re-MI were similar between the two groups. Conclusions. In patients with AMI and prediabetes, 2G-DES implantation was more efficacious than 1G-DES implantation over a 2-year follow-up period. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results. SN - 0896-4327 UR - https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1710439 DO - 10.1155/2020/1710439 JF - Journal of Interventional Cardiology PB - Hindawi KW - ER -