Journal of Mathematics

Volume 2014, Article ID 713690, 13 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/713690

## A Special Class of Infinite Dimensional Dirac Operators on the Abstract Boson-Fermion Fock Space

Department of Mathematics, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan

Received 31 May 2014; Accepted 18 August 2014; Published 8 September 2014

Academic Editor: Nasser Saad

Copyright © 2014 Asao Arai. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

Spectral properties of a special class of infinite dimensional Dirac operators on the abstract boson-fermion Fock space associated with the pair of complex Hilbert spaces are investigated, where is a perturbation parameter (a coupling constant in the context of physics) and the unperturbed operator is taken to be a free infinite dimensional Dirac operator. A variety of the kernel of is shown. It is proved that there are cases where, for all sufficiently large with , has infinitely many nonzero eigenvalues even if has no nonzero eigenvalues. Also Fredholm property of restricted to a subspace of is discussed.

#### 1. Introduction

In a previous paper [1] (cf. [2]), the author introduced a general class of infinite dimensional Dirac type operators on the abstract boson-fermion Fock space associated with the pair of complex Hilbert spaces (for the definition of and , see Section 2), where is a densely defined closed linear operator from to . The operator gives an infinite dimensional and abstract version of finite dimensional Dirac type operators. In applications to physics, unifies self-adjoint supercharges (generators of supersymmetry) of some supersymmetric quantum field models (e.g., [3–6]).

In the paper [1], basic properties of are discussed. As for the spectral properties of , only the zero-eigenvalue of is considered. Moreover, a class of perturbations for is introduced and, under a suitable condition, a path (functional) integral representation for the index of the perturbed operator restricted to a subspace of is established. The (essential) self-adjointness of is partially discussed in [7]. Analysis of other properties of including spectral ones except for the zero-eigenvalue has been left open.

In this paper, we undertake a comprehensive operator-theoretical analysis for . But, as a preliminary, we consider, in the present paper, only the case where is a simple form and see what kind of phenomena occurs under the perturbation .

The outline of the present paper is as follows. In Section 2 we review briefly some contents in [1]. In Section 3 we identify the spectra of . This is done via spectral analysis of a second quantization operator on the boson-fermion Fock space . In Section 4, we introduce a perturbation with and , where is a perturbation parameter (a coupling constant in the context of physics). The perturbed operator is the main object of our analysis in the present paper. We prove the self-adjointness of and the essential self-adjointness of it on a suitable dense subspace of with some other properties (Theorem 14). Also the spectra of are identified (Theorem 16). Moreover, it is shown that the domain of is equal to that of for all sufficiently small (Theorem 17). Section 5 is devoted to analysis of the kernel of . We see that the kernel property of may be sensitive to conditions for . In Section 6 we consider Fredholm property of , the restriction of to a subspace of , in comparison with that of . We obtain some classification on Fredholm property of (Theorem 26). An interesting phenomenon occurs in the following sense: for a constant (resp., ), is not semi-Fredholm even if is Fredholm (resp., semi-Fredholm). In the last section, we consider nonzero eigenvalues of . We show that, under a suitable condition, for all sufficiently large with , has infinitely many nonzero eigenvalues even if has no nonzero eigenvalues (Theorem 27). This structure also is interesting, which may be regarded as a strong coupling effect.

#### 2. Brief Review on the Theory of Dirac Operators on the Abstract Boson-Fermion Fock Space

##### 2.1. Definitions

For a linear operator on a Hilbert space, we use the following notation:(i): the domain of ,(ii): the range of ,(iii): the kernel of ,(iv): the resolvent set of ( is injective with being dense and the inverse operator is bounded),(v): the spectrum of ,(vi): the point spectrum of (the set of eigenvalues of ).

For a complex Hilbert space and a nonnegative integer , we denote by (resp., ) the -fold symmetric (resp., antisymmetric) tensor product Hilbert space of with convention (the complex number field) and . In terms of these Hilbert spaces, one can construct two types of larger Hilbert spaces. The one is the* boson (symmetric) Fock space over *, denoted by , which is defined to be the complete infinite direct sum of , :
where, for a complex Hilbert space , we denote its inner product (resp., norm) by (linear in the second variable) (resp., ). The other is the* fermion (antisymmetric) Fock space over *, denoted by , which is defined to be the complete infinite direct sum of , :
For general theories of boson and fermion Fock spaces, see, for example, [8–10].

Let be a complex Hilbert space. Then the* abstract boson-fermion Fock space* associated with the pair is defined as the tensor product Hilbert space
of and .

For each , we denote by the* bosonic annihilation operator* on with test vector ; that is, is the densely defined closed linear operator acting in such that its adjoint is given by the following form:
where is the symmetrization operator acting on the -fold tensor product Hilbert space .

Let
called the* bosonic Fock vacuum*. Then, for all ,

For each , there exists a unique linear operator on , called the* fermionic annihilation operator* with test vector , which has the following properties: (i) and is bounded with operator norm ; (ii) its adjoint is of the following form:
where is the antisymmetrization operator acting on the -fold tensor product Hilbert space . The following canonical anticommutation relations (CAR) hold:
where . In particular, one has

The vector
is called the* fermionic Fock vacuum* and obeys

##### 2.2. Infinite Dimensional Exterior Differential Operators

For a subset of a Hilbert space, we denote by the subspace algebraically spanned by all the vectors of .

Let be a densely defined closed linear operator from to and define where for a linear operator on a Hilbert space (the symbol with should read ). It follows that is dense in .

The following proposition is proved in [1].

Proposition 1. *There exists a unique densely defined closed linear operator on such that the following (i) and (ii) hold: *(i)* and is a core of .*(ii)*For each vector of the form
**acts as
* *where indicates the omission of . In particular, leaves invariant.**Moreover, the following (iii)–(v) hold: *(iii)* and
for all vectors of the form (13) with . In the case , we have . In particular, leaves invariant.*(iv)* and, for all , .*(v)*Let be a bounded linear operator from to with . Then, for all and ,
*

*The operator is an abstract version of finite dimensional exterior differential operators, including an infinite dimensional version of them if and are infinite dimensional.*

*2.3. Infinite Dimensional Dirac Operators*

*2.3. Infinite Dimensional Dirac Operators**Using the operator , we define a free Dirac operator on by
with . We set
a Laplace-Beltrami operator on .*

*For a self-adjoint operator on , we define an operator on by
where denotes identity and, for a closable linear operator , denotes the closure of . For each , is self-adjoint. The second quantization of on is defined by
which is self-adjoint (see, e.g., [9, Section 5.2], [11, p.302, Example 2]). It follows that
*

*Similarly, for a self-adjoint operator on , we can define the second quantization of on by
where
acting in . Similarly to the case of , one has
*

*The number operator on is defined by
Then the operator
on is self-adjoint with . The spectrum of is with eigenspaces
giving the orthogonal decomposition
*

*Let and be the orthogonal projections onto and , respectively. Then
*

*For notational simplicity we set
We introduce an operator
acting in , which is nonnegative and self-adjoint. It follows from (21) and (24) that
*

*Theorem 2 (see [1]). (i) The operator is self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint on every core of . In particular, is essentially self-adjoint on .(ii) The operator leaves invariant and
on .(iii) The following operator equalities hold:
*

*Remark 3. *The quadruple is an abstract form of models of free supersymmetric quantum field theory, where , , and are a self-adjoint supercharge, a supersymmetric Hamiltonian, and a sign operator of states (a “fermion number operator”), respectively [1].

*For a linear operator , we set
the nullity of .*

*Theorem 4 (see [1, Lemma 3.4]). *

Hence the following hold. (i)Let and . Then .(ii)Let and . Then .(iii)Let . Then .

*2.4. Fredholm Property and Index*

*2.4. Fredholm Property and Index**Let be a self-adjoint operator on such that leaves invariant satisfying on . This class of operators may be an abstract category of Dirac operators on the abstract boson-fermion Fock space .*

*Then it is easy to show that the operator defined by
is a densely defined closed linear operator from to . We define an index of by
provided that at least one of and is finite. Note that
the index of (e.g., [12, Chapter IV, Section 5]).*

*As for the Fredholm property of , one has the following theorem.*

*Theorem 5 (see [1, Proposition 3.2]). (i) Let be injective and Fredholm. Then is Fredholm with
*

(ii) Let be semi-Fredholm with and let be injective. Then is semi-Fredholm with

(iii) Let be semi-Fredholm with and . Then is not semi-Fredholm.

*3. Spectra of and *

*3. Spectra of and*

*Now we go into analyzing new aspects in the operator theory of and its perturbations. In the previous paper [1], the identification of the spectra of and was not discussed except for zero-eigenvalues. This section is devoted to identifying completely the spectra of and .*

*In what follows, we assume that and are separable.*

*We say that a subset of is symmetric with respect to the origin if implies that .*

*The main results in this section are as follows.*

*Theorem 6. *

*Theorem 7. The spectrum and the point spectrum of are symmetric with respect to the origin andwith
*

*To prove these theorems, we need a series of lemmas.*

*Lemma 8. Let be a self-adjoint operator on a Hilbert space. (i)Suppose that is symmetric with respect to the origin. Then
(ii)Suppose that is symmetric with respect to the origin. Then
Moreover, for each with , .*

*Proof. *(i) Let be the set on the right hand side of (46). Then, by the spectral mapping theorem, we have . Conversely, let , so that . Hence there exists a sequence such that and . Suppose that . Then is bijective with bounded. Hence , which means that . Hence . Then, by the symmetry of , is in . But this is a contradiction. Hence . Thus .

(ii) Let be the set on the right hand side of (47). Then it is obvious that . Conversely, let , so that . Hence there exists a vector such that and . The second equation is written as . If , then . Hence, by the symmetry of , is in . If , then . Hence . Thus . These arguments also imply the last statement.

*A sufficient condition for the spectra of a self-adjoint operator to be symmetric with respect to the origin is given in the following lemma.*

*Lemma 9. Let be a self-adjoint operator on a Hilbert space . Suppose that there exists a bounded self-adjoint operator on such that and leaves invariant satisfying
Then and are symmetric with respect to the origin and, for all ,
*

*Proof. *Note that is unitary with . Equation (48) implies the operator equality . Hence is unitarily equivalent to . Thus the desired results follow.

*Lemma 10. Let be a complex Hilbert space and be a self-adjoint operator on . Let be the direct sum of ’s acting in the direct sum Hilbert space . Then, is self-adjoint and
*

*Proof. *See, for example, [8, Proposition 3.5-(ii), Theorem 3.7-(i)].

*Lemma 11. Let be a self-adjoint operator on . Then
*

*Proof. *The following are well known (e.g., [8, Proposition 4.12]): and, for all ,
By these facts and Lemma 10, we obtain (51) and (52).

*For a self-adjoint operator on a Hilbert space and , we define
where, for a finite set , denotes the number of the elements of and denotes the discrete spectrum of (the set of isolated eigenvalues of with finite multiplicity).*

*Lemma 12 (see [13, Corollary 3.2]). *

*Proof of Theorem 6. *By a theorem on the spectrum of the sum of tensor products of self-adjoint operators (e.g., [14, Corollary 7.25]),
where we have used the fact that the set on the right hand side is closed (note that , ). By (51) and (55),
with
By Deift’s theorem [15], we have
Hence and . Therefore it follows that . The converse inclusion relation is obvious. Thus . The set on the right hand side is equal to the set on the right hand side of (42). Thus (42) holds.

The proof of (43) is similar to that of (42), where we use another version of Deift's theorem [15]:
with for each positive eigenvalue of ().

*Proof of Theorem 7. *By Theorem 2(ii) and Lemma 9, and are symmetric with respect to the origin and (45) holds. By Lemma 8 and Theorem 2(iii), we have
By these facts and Theorem 6, we obtain (44).

*4. A Class of Perturbed Infinite Dimensional Dirac Operators*

*4. A Class of Perturbed Infinite Dimensional Dirac Operators**In this section we consider a class of perturbations of . It would be natural to perturb through a perturbation of . Let , and define
where is a perturbation parameter (a coupling constant in the context of physics). We have by direct computation
The adjoint is densely defined with and
Hecne is closable. We denote the closure of by . Then, for all , is in and
*

*The operator yields a perturbed Dirac operator:
By an application of [2, Lemma 4.1], one sees that is a closed symmetric operator. We have
with
*

*In what follows, we investigate properties of .*

*4.1. Self-Adjointness of *

*4.1. Self-Adjointness of**We define a linear operator from to by
It is obvious that is a bounded operator (a one-rank operator). Hence
is a densely defined closed linear operator with .*

*The following lemma is a key fact.*

*Lemma 13. For all , the following operator equality holds:
*

*Proof. *Let be a vector of the form (13). Then, using the canonical commutation relations (CCR)
on
and (6), we have
Hence, by Proposition 1-(v)
By a limiting argument, we obtain the operator equality (72).

*Theorem 14. (i) For all , is self-adjoint and
*

(ii) For all , is essentially self-adjoint on .

(iii) For all ,

(iv) The operator leaves invariant and

(v) For all , the vector-valued function: is strongly continuous on . Moreover, for all , is strongly continuous in .

*Proof. *(i) Operator equality (77) follows from (72) and (67). Then, by Theorem 2-(i) with replaced by ), we conclude that is self-adjoint.

(ii) We have the following operator equalities:
where and are bounded linear operators on and , respectively, given as follows:
Hence, by the Kato-Rellich theorem ([12, Chapter V, Theorems 4.3, 4.4], [10, Theorem ]), (resp., ) is essentially self-adjoint on each core of (resp., ). In particular, (resp., ) is a core of (resp., ). Hence, by a core property of second quantization operators, is a core of . By this fact and Theorem 2-(i), is a core of .

(iii) This follows from (ii) and (68).

(iv) This follows from (77) and Theorem 2-(ii) with replaced by .

(v) Let . Then, for all , we have
Since is a common core for as proved in part (ii), a general fact [11, Theorem VIII.25] implies the strong continuity of () in .

*Remark 15. *Since the operators and are finite rank, they are compact. Hence it follows from (80) and a general theorem (e.g., [16, p.113, Corollary 2]) that, for all ,
where, for a self-adjoint operator , denotes the essential spectrum of . In particular, if the spectrum is purely discrete (in this case, also is purely discrete by (60)), then so are and .

*4.2. Spectra of *

*4.2. Spectra of*

*We have (77). Hence, applying Theorem 7 with replaced by , we obtain the following result on the spectra of .*

*Theorem 16. For all , and are symmetric with respect to the origin andwith
*

*This theorem shows that the spectrum and the point spectrum of are completely determined from those of .*

*4.3. Identification of the Domain of *

*4.3. Identification of the Domain of**The following theorem gives a sufficient condition for the domain of to be equal to that of the unperturbed operator .*

*Theorem 17. Suppose that is injective and . Then, for all , is self-adjoint with and
Moreover, is essentially self-adjoint on any core for .*

*To prove this theorem, we recall well known facts (e.g., [17, Lemma 2.1], [8]).*

*Lemma 18. Let be a nonnegative self-adjoint operator on with . Then, for all , with
*

*Lemma 19. The operator is a closed symmetric operator with .*

*Proof. *We need only to prove the closedness of . Using (9) and a limiting argument, we have, for all ,
Hence, by a general fact [2, Lemma 4.1], is closed.

*Lemma 20. Let be injective and . Then .*

*Proof. *Under the present assumption, is injective and . Let . Then, using (87) and the well known fact that
we can show that
By this estimate and the fact that
we obtain
Since is a core of , this inequality extends to all showing that . Similarly, using (88), we can show that with
Thus .

*Proof of Theorem 17. *By Lemma 20 and Theorem 14, the operator
is essentially self-adjoint with and . By (89), the CCR (73), and the CAR (8), one can show that, for all ,
Hence, using (87) (cf. the proof of Lemma 20), we obtain
Therefore, by the Kato-Rellich theorem, for all satisfying , is self-adjoint on , implying that , and essentially self-adjoint on any core for .

*5. Kernel of *

*5. Kernel of*

*In this section we investigate the kernel of . For this purpose, we need some conditions on . is injective, , and . In this case we introduce a constant
is injective, , and . In this case we introduce a constant
(a) is injective and or (b) is injective and with . (a) is injective and or (b) is injective and with .*

*Remark 21. *(i) If and hold, then it follows that .

(ii) If is Fredholm, then is Fredholm [12, Chapter IV, Corollary 5.14]. Hence, if and hold and is Fredholm, then , . Hence and are bijective with and . Thus, in this case, conditions and are trivially satisfied.

*We first consider the kernel of and .*

*Lemma 22. (i) Suppose that holds. Then
*

(ii) Suppose that holds. Then

(iii) Suppose that holds. Then, for all ,

(iv) Suppose that holds. Then, for all ,

*Proof. *(i) Let . Then and
Hence
with . This implies

Let . Then, taking the inner product of (106) with and using the fact that , we have . Hence, by (106) again, . Thus (100) follows.

Let . Then
Hence . Thus, by (107), we obtain (101).

(ii) We have
Hence, by replacing by in the proof of (i), we can easily obtain (102).

(iii) For all , we have (105). Let . Then (105) means that . Hence, if , then , which implies via (105) again that ; that is, . Thus (103) follows.

If with , then and hence . Hence . Thus (103) follows.

(iv) It is similar to the proof of (iii).

*Theorem 23. (i) Assume . Then
and hence .*

Moreover, for all ,

(ii) Assume . Then

(iii) Assume . Then, for all ,

(iv) Assume . Then, for all ,

*Proof. *Under condition , we have (100) and (101). Hence . Therefore, applying (77) and Theorem 4, we obtain (110).

In the case , (111) follows from (100), (77), and Theorem 4.

Using Lemma 22, one can prove (ii)–(iv) in the same manner as in the proof of (i).

*Some compatible compositions of conditions yield the following results.*

*Corollary 24. (i) Assume and . Then
*

(ii) Assume and . Then