/ / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 9951434 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9951434

Soukaina Ouarab, "-Smarandache Ruled Surface and -Smarandache Ruled Surface according to Alternative Moving Frame in ", Journal of Mathematics, vol. 2021, Article ID 9951434, 6 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9951434

# -Smarandache Ruled Surface and -Smarandache Ruled Surface according to Alternative Moving Frame in

Accepted19 Jun 2021
Published29 Jun 2021

#### Abstract

In this study, original definitions of Smarandache ruled surface and Smarandache ruled surface according to the alternative moving frame are introduced in . The main results of the study are presented in theorems that give necessary and sufficient conditions for those special surfaces to be developable and minimal. Finally, an example with illustrations is presented.

#### 1. Introduction

In the classical differential geometry [1, 2], a ruled surface is a surface that can be swept out by moving a line in space. Hence, it is generated by a family of straight lines called rulings. It, therefore, has a parametrization of the formwhere is an open interval of the real line , is called the base curve of the ruled surface, and are the rulings directors of the ruled surface.

Ruled surfaces are useful and have practical applications in many areas such as mathematical physics, computer aided geometric design (CAGD), moving geometry, and kinematics.

The most important and interesting notions relative to the study of ruled surfaces are the developability and the minimalist notions.

Generally, developable ruled surfaces can be transformed into the plane without any deformation and distortion, and they form relatively small subsets that contain cylinders, cones, and tangent surfaces. They are characterized with vanishing Gaussian curvature . On the contrary, minimal surfaces are surfaces that locally minimize their area. They refer to the fixed boundary curve of a surface area that is minimal with respect to other surfaces with the same boundary. They are characterized with vanishing mean curvature .

Study of ruled surface according to some moving frames was and still being the point of interest for several researchers. Indeed, in , ruled surface was studied using the Darboux frame in . Explicitly, we constructed the ruled surface generated by a curve lying on an arbitrary regular surface and whose rulings are constant linear combinations of Darboux frame vectors of on . We made a comparative study between both surfaces and along their common curve , investigated properties of the built ruled surface , characterized it, and presented examples with illustrations.

However, in , we studied ruled surface using the alternative moving frame  in . We built and studied the ruled surface whose rulings are constant linear combinations of alternative frame vectors of its base curve. We investigated properties of the constructed ruled surface, characterized it, and gave examples with illustrations in the case where the base curve is represented by some general helices  (resp. slant helices ).

In curve theory, Smarandache curves were introduced for the first time in Minkowski space-time by authors in . Generally, a Smarandache curve defines a curve whose position vector is composed by a moving frame vectors on another regular curve. In , one can find two Smarandache curves introduced according to the alternative moving frame. It concerns Smarandache curves and Smarandache curves.

In this study, we are inspired by Smarandache curves to introduce the notions of Smarandache ruled surface and Smarandache ruled surface according to the alternative frame in . We investigate theorems that give necessary and sufficient conditions for those two special ruled surfaces to be developable and minimal. Also, we derive some useful corollaries of the results. Furthermore, we present example with illustrations.

#### 2. Preliminaries

Let be the Euclidean 3-space provided with the standard flat metric given by , where is a rectangular coordinate system of . Recall that the norm of an arbitrary vector is given by .

Letbe a ruled surface in .

Let us denote by the unit normal on the ruled surface at a regular point, and we havewhere and .

Definition 1. (see ). A ruled surface is developable if the three vectors , , and are linearly dependant.

The first and the second fundamental forms of ruled surface at a regular point are defined, respectively, bywhere

Definition 2. (see ). The Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature of the ruled surface at a regular point are given, respectively, by

Proposition 1. (see ). A ruled surface is developable if and only if its Gaussian curvature vanishes.

Proposition 2. (see ). A regular surface is minimal if and only if its mean curvature vanishes.

Due to a unit speed curve with nonvanishing second derivative, there exists the Frenet–Serret frame denoted , where is the unit tangent vector, is the principal normal vector, and is the binormal vector of the curve , respectively.

Then, the Frenet–Serret frame formulae is given bywhere and are the curvature and the torsion of the curve , respectively.

The unit Darboux vector of the curve is given bywhich is the angular velocity vector of . One can clearly see that the unit Darboux vector is perpendicular to the principal normal . Then, defining a unit vector by the cross product makes it possible to build another orthonormal moving frame along the curve . This frame is defined by and is called the alternative frame of the curve .

The derivative formulae of the alternative frame is given bywhere and .

Definition 3. (see ). NC-Smarandache curves according to the alternative frame of the curve are given by

Definition 4. (see ). NW-Smarandache curves according to the alternative frame of the curve are given by

Theorem 1. (see ). is a general helix if and only if the ratiois constant along the curve.

Theorem 2. (see ). is a slant helix if and only ifis a constant function.

#### 3. NC-Smarandache Ruled Surface and NW-Smarandache Ruled Surface according to the Alternative Frame in

We start our section by giving new and original definitions of two Smarandache ruled surfaces according to the alternative frame of a curve in .

Definition 5. Let be the -class differentiable unit speed curve in . Let us denote by the alternative frame of . The following ruled surfaces generated by -Smarandache curve and -Smarandache curve, which are defined, respectively, byare called -Smarandache ruled surface and -Smarandache ruled surface, according to alternative moving frame of the curve , respectively.

In the rest of this section, we will investigate theorems that give necessary and sufficient conditions for both surfaces (14) to be developable and minimal.

Theorem 3. -Smarandache ruled surface of (14) is developable if and only if the invariants of the alternative frame of the curve assume the equality .

Theorem 4. -Smarandache ruled surface of (14) is minimal if and only if the invariants of the alternative frame of the curve assume the equality .

Proof. Differentiating the first line of (14) with respect to and , respectively, and using (9), we obtainThe cross product of these two vectors gives the normal vector on -Smarandache ruled surface of (14):Thus, under regularity condition, the unit normal takes the formMaking the norms for (15), we get the components of the first fundamental form of -Smarandache ruled surface of (14), at regular points, as follows:Differentiating (15) with respect to and , respectively, and using (9), we obtainHence, from (17) and (19), the components of the second fundamental form of -Smarandache ruled surface of (14) are obtained at regular points as follows:Consequently, from (18) and (20), we obtain the Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature of -Smarandache ruled surface of (14) at regular points:which replies to both the above theorems.

Corollary 1. If is a planar curve (resp. general helix), then - Smarandache ruled surface is developable but nonminimal.

Theorem 6. -Smarandache ruled surface of (14) is developable.

Theorem 7. -Smarandache ruled surface of (14) is minimal if and only if is a slant helix.

Proof. Differentiating the second line of (14) with respect to and , respectively, and using (9), we obtainwhich implies that the normal vector on -Smarandache ruled surface of (14) isThus, under regularity condition, the unit normal is given byMaking the norms for (22), we get the components of the first fundamental form of -Smarandache ruled surface of (14) at regular points:Differentiating (22) with respect to and , respectively, and using (9), we obtainTherefore, from (24) and (26), the components of the second fundamental form of -Smarandache ruled surface of (14) are obtained at regular points as follows:Consequently, from (25) and (27), we obtain the Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature of -Smarandache ruled surface of (14) at regular points:which means clearly that -Smarandache ruled surface is developable. However, it is minimal if and only if , so  = constant, which is equivalent to have as slant helix.

Corollary 2. If is a planar curve (resp. general helix and resp. slant helix), then -Smarandache ruled surface is developable and minimal.

Here follows, we give example investigating -Smarandache ruled surface and -Smarandache ruled surface according to alternative frame of a special cuvre. In addition, we present illustrations of both surfaces.

Example 1. Let us consider the regular curve defined byThe alternative frame vectors of curve (29) are given, respectively, byHence, -Smarandache ruled surface according to the alternative frame (30) of curve (29) is given by the parametric representation:In addidtion, its illustration is represented by the following Figure 1 which is drawn for .
On the contrary, -Smarandache ruled surface according to the alternative frame (30) of curve (29) is given byand its illustration is represented in Figure 2 which is drawn for .

#### 4. Conclusion

-Smarandache ruled surface and -Smarandache ruled surface, according to the alternative frame of a curve, are introduced in . The results of the paper are presented in the form of theorems that give necessary and sufficient conditions for those special surfaces to be developable and minimal. The investigated characterizations give relationships according to the invariants of the alternative frame, the notion of general helix, and the notion of slant helix. Finally, an example is presented with illustrations.

#### Data Availability

No data were used to support this study.

#### Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

1. D. J. Struik, Lectures on Classical Differential Geometry, Dover, Mineola, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1988.
2. M. P. Do Carmo, Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, Prentice-Hall, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1976.
3. G. Hu, H. Cao, J. Wu, and G. Wei, “Construction of developable surfaces using generalized C-bézier bases with shape parameters,” Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 39, no. 3, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
4. T. G. Nelson, T. Zimmerman, S. P. Magleby, R. J. Lang, and L. L. Howell, “Developable mechanisms on developable surfaces,” Science Robotics, vol. 4, no. 27, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
5. P. Alegre, K. Arslan, A. Carriazo, C. Murathan, and G. Öztürk, “Some special types of developable ruled surface,” Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 319–325, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
6. W. Y. Lam, “Minimal surfaces from infinitesimal deformations of circle packings,” Advances in Mathematics, vol. 362, Article ID 106939, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
7. T. H. Colding and C. D. Lellis, “The min-max construction of minimal surfaces,” Surveys in Differential Geometry, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 75–107, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
8. J. L. M. Barbosa and A. G. Colares, Minimal Surfaces in , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1986.
9. S. Ouarab, A. O. Chahdi, and M. Izid, “Ruled surface generated by a curve lying on a regular surface and its characterizations,” Journal for Geometry and Graphics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 257–267, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
10. S. Ouarab, A. O. Chahdi, and M. Izid, “Ruled surfaces with alternative moving frame in euclidean 3-space,” International Journal of Mathematical Science and Engineering Applications, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 43–58, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
11. B. Uzunoğlu, A. Gök, and Y. Yahy, “A new approach on curves of constant precession,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 275, pp. 317–323, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
12. A. T. Ali, “Position vectors of general helices in euclidean 3-space,” Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 198–205, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
13. A. T. Ali, “Position vectors of slant helices in euclidean 3-space,” Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
14. M. Turgut and S. Yilmaz, “Smarandache curves in minkowski space-time,” International Journal of Mathematical Combinatorics, vol. 3, pp. 51–55, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
15. S. Şenyuri and G. Kaya, “NC-smarandache curves and NW-smarandache curve according to alternative frame,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education (ICMME 2018), pp. 269–274, Ordu, Turkey, June 2018. View at: Google Scholar
16. B. O’Neill, Semi-Riemannian Geometry, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1983.
17. S. Izumya and N. Takeuchi, “New special curves and developabel surfaces,” Turkish Journal of Mathematics, vol. 74, pp. 97–109, 2002. View at: Google Scholar