Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Marine Biology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 519510, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/519510
Research Article

Covarying Shell Growth Parameters and the Regulation of Shell Shape in Marine Bivalves: A Case Study on Tellinoidea

1Société d’Histoire Naturelle, 12 rue des Pyrénées, 71200 Le Creusot, France
2Biogéosciences, Université de Bourgogne, 21000 Dijon, France

Received 12 February 2014; Revised 25 April 2014; Accepted 4 May 2014; Published 29 May 2014

Academic Editor: Ricardo Serrão Santos

Copyright © 2014 Jean Béguinot. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. A. Réaumur, “Eclaircissemens de quelques difficultés sur la formation et l'accroissement des coquilles,” in Histoire de l'Académie Royale des Sciences Avec les Mémoires de Mathematique et Physique, pp. 384–394, 1716. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. W. Thompson, On Growth and Form, Cambridge University Press, London, UK, 1942.
  3. D. M. Raup, “The geometry of coiling in gastropods,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 47, pp. 602–609, 1961. View at Google Scholar
  4. D. M. Raup, “Geometric analysis of shell coiling: general problems,” Journal of Paleontology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1178–1190, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  5. D. E. Schindel, “Unoccupied morphospace and the coiled geometry of gastropods: architectural constraint or geometric covariation,” in Causes of Evolution, R. A. Ross and W. D. Allmon, Eds., pp. 270–304, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  6. B. Tursch, “Spiral growth: the “Museum of all shells” revisited,” Journal of Molluscan Studies, vol. 63, pp. 547–554, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  7. S. H. Rice, “The bio-geometry of mollusc shells,” Paleobiology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 133–149, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. S. Galtsoff, “The American Oyster, Crassostrea virginica Gmelin—morphology and structure of shell,” Fishery Bulletin, vol. 64, pp. 16–47, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Sokołowski, K. Pawlikowski, M. Wołowicz, P. Garcia, and J. Namieśnik, “Shell deformations in the Baltic clam Macoma balthica from southern Baltic Sea (the Gulf of Gdansk): hypotheses on environmental effects,” Ambio, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 93–100, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Caill-Milly, N. Bru, K. Mahé, C. Borie, and F. D’Amico, “Shell shape analysis and spatial allometry patterns of Manila Clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) in a mesotidial coastal lagoon,” Journal of Marine Biology, vol. 2012, Article ID 281206, 11 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. N. A. Holme, “Notes on the mode of life of the Tellinidae (Lamellibranchia),” Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, vol. 41, pp. 699–703, 1961. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. M. Stanley, Relation of Shell Form To Life Habits of the Bivalvia (Mollusca), The Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colo, USA, 1970.
  13. G. J. Vermeij, A Natural History of Shells, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1993.
  14. O. Ellers, “Form and motion of Donax variabilis in flow,” Biological Bulletin, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 138–147, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. G. Soares, R. K. Callahan, and A. M. C. De Ruyck, “Microevolution and phenotypic plasticity in Donax serra roding (Bivalvia: Donacidae) on high energy sandy beaches,” Journal of Molluscan Studies, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 407–421, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. C. Anderson and P. D. Roopnarine, “Role of constraint and selection in the morphologic evolution of Caryocorbula (Mollusca: Corbulidae) from the Caribbean Neogene,” Palaeontologia Electronica, vol. 8, no. 2, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. S. Freeman and J. E. Byers, “Divergent induced responses to an invasive predator in marine mussel populations,” Science, vol. 313, no. 5788, pp. 831–833, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Hollander, D. C. Adams, and K. Johannesson, “Evolution of adaptation through allometric shifts in a marine snail,” Evolution, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 2490–2497, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Hollander, M. L. Collyer, D. C. Adams, and K. Johannesson, “Phenotypic plasticity in two marine snails: constraints superseding life history,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1861–1872, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Lakowitz, C. Brönmark, and P. Nyström, “Tuning in to multiple predators: conflicting demands for shell morphology in a freshwater snail,” Freshwater Biology, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 2184–2191, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. T. C. Edgell and R. Rochette, “Differential snail predation by an exotic crab and the geography of shell-claw covariance in the northwest Atlantic,” Evolution, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 1216–1228, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. D. G. Harley, M. W. Denny, K. J. MacH, and L. P. Miller, “Thermal stress and morphological adaptations in limpets,” Functional Ecology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 292–301, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. M. Peyer, J. C. Hermanson, and C. E. Lee, “Developmental plasticity of shell morphology of quagga mussels from shallow and deep-water habitats of the Great Lakes,” The Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 213, no. 15, pp. 2602–2609, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. L. Minton, E. M. Lewis, B. Netherland, and D. M. Hayes, “Large differences over small distances: plasticity in the shells of Elimia potosiensis (Gastropoda: Pleuroceridae),” International Journal of Biology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  25. S. M. Peyer, J. C. Hermanson, and C. E. Lee, “Effects of shell morphology on mechanics of zebra and quagga mussel locomotion,” The Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 214, no. 13, pp. 2226–2236, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. M. Serb, A. Alejandrino, E. Otárola-Castillo, and D. C. Adams, “Morphological convergence of shell shape in distantly related scallop species (Mollusca: Pectinidae),” Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 571–584, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. Morais, M. M. Rufino, J. Reis, E. Dias, and R. Sousa, “Assessing the morphological variability of Unio delphinus Spengler 1738 (Bivalvia : Uninonidae) using geometric morphometry,” Journal of Molluscan Studies, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  28. T. D. Levine, H. B. Hansen, and G. W. Gerald, “Effects of shell shape, size, and sculpture in burrowing and anchoring abilities in the freshwater mussel Potamilus alatus (Unionidae),” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 136–144, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  29. R. D. K. Thomas, “Functional morphology, ecology and evolutionary conservatism in the Glycymerididae (Bivalvia),” Palaeontology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 217–254, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  30. S. J. Gould, “A developmental constraint in Cerion, with comments on the definition and interpretation of constraint in evolution,” Evolution, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 516–539, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Béguinot, “Régulation du développement dimensionnel de la coquille chez trois espèces de Gastéropodes,” Bulletin Société Linnéenne de Lyon, vol. 83, no. 5-6, pp. 119–126, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  32. S. C. Ackerly, “Morphogenetic regulation in the shells of bivalves and brachiopods: evidence from the geometry of the spiral,” Lethaia, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 249–256, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. J. Rogers, “A description of the generating curve of bivalves with straight hinges,” Palaeontology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 109–117, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  34. A. Robin, Encyclopedia of Marine Bivalves, ConchBooks, Hackenheim, Germany, 2011.
  35. J. Maynard-Smith, R. Burian, S. Kauffman et al., “Developmental constraints and evolution: a perspective from the Mountain Lake Conference on development and evolution,” Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 265–287, 1975. View at Google Scholar