Table of Contents
Journal of Medical Engineering
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 983938, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/983938
Research Article

Development of an Anatomically Realistic Forward Solver for Thoracic Electrical Impedance Tomography

1Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
2Division of Radiological Medical Physics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
3Institute of Engineering in Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

Received 14 December 2012; Revised 25 February 2013; Accepted 26 February 2013

Academic Editor: Hengyong Yu

Copyright © 2013 Fei Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. P. Henderson and J. G. Webster, “Impedance camera for spatially specific measurements of thorax,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 250–254, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  2. F. Yang and R. P. Patterson, “The contribution of the lungs to thoracic impedance measurements: a simulation study based on a high resolution finite difference model,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. S153–S161, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. L. V. Costa, C. N. Chaves, S. Gomes, M. A. Beraldo, M. S. Volpe, M. R. Tucci et al., “Real-time detection of pneumothorax using electrical impedance tomogyaphy,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1230–1238, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  4. H. J. Smit, A. V. Noordegraaf, J. T. Marcus, A. Boonstra, P. M. de Vries, and P. E. Postmus, “Determinants of pulmonary perfusion measured by electrical impedance tomography,” The European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 92, no. 1-2, pp. 45–49, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. Boone, A. M. Lewis, and D. S. Holder, “Imaging of cortical spreading depression of EIT-implications for localization of elieptic foci,” Physiological Measurement, supplement 2a, pp. A189–A198, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  6. C. T. Soulsby, M. Khela, E. Yazaki, D. F. Evans, E. Hennessy, and J. Powell-Tuck, “Measurements of gastric emptying during continuous nasogastric infusion of liquid feed: electric impedance tomography versus gamma scintigraphy,” Clinical Nutrition, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 671–680, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. J. Moskowitz, T. P. Ryan, K. D. Paulsen, and S. E. Mitchell, “Clinical implementation of electrical impedance tomography with hyperthermia,” International Journal of Hyperthermia, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 141–149, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. Yang and R. P. Patterson, “A novel impedance-based tomography approach for stenotic plaque detection: a simulation study,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 279–283, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. I. Frerichs, J. Scholz, and N. Weiler, “10: electrical impedance tomography and its perspectives in intensive care medicine,” in Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, pp. 437–447, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
  10. A. Adler, J. H. Arnold, R. Bayford et al., “GREIT: a unified approach to 2D linear EIT reconstruction of lung images,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. S35–S55, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. F. Yang and R. Patterson, “Optimal transvenous coil position on active-can single-coil ICD defibrillation efficacy: a simulation study,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1659–1667, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Malmivuo and R. Plonsey, “7: Volume source and volume conductor,” in Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Omagnetic Fields, pp. 405–407, University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  13. W. R. B. Lionheart, “EIT reconstruction algorithms: pitfalls, challenges and recent developments,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 125–142, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. K. Kauppinen, J. A. Hyttinen, and J. A. Malmivuo, “Sensitivity distributions of impedance cardiography using band and spot electrodes analyzed by a three-dimensional computer model,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 694–702, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. L. de Jongh, E. G. Entcheva, J. A. Replogle, R. S. Booker III, B. H. Kenknight, and F. J. Claydon, “Defibrillation efficacy of different electrode placements in a human thorax model,” Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 152–157, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. F. Aguel, J. C. Eason, N. A. Trayanova, G. Siekas, and M. G. Fishler, “Impact of transvenous lead position on active-can ICD defibrillation: a computer simulation study,” Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 158–164, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Wtorek, “Relations between components of impedance cardiogram analyzed by means of finite element model and sensitivity theorem,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1352–1361, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. Mocanu, J. Kettenbach, M. O. Sweeney, R. Kikinis, B. H. Kenknight, and S. R. Eisenberg, “A comparison of biventricular and conventional transvenous defibrillation: a computational study using patient derived models,” Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 586–593, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus