Journal of Mycology

Journal of Mycology / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 172056 |

Sogra Fathima Musavi, Raj Mohan Balakrishnan, "Biodiversity, Antimicrobial Potential, and Phylogenetic Placement of an Endophytic Fusarium oxysporum NFX 06 Isolated from Nothapodytes foetida", Journal of Mycology, vol. 2013, Article ID 172056, 10 pages, 2013.

Biodiversity, Antimicrobial Potential, and Phylogenetic Placement of an Endophytic Fusarium oxysporum NFX 06 Isolated from Nothapodytes foetida

Academic Editor: Simona Nardoni
Received30 Sep 2013
Revised31 Oct 2013
Accepted05 Nov 2013
Published22 Dec 2013


Biodiversity of endophytic fungi associated with the medicinal plant Nothapodytes foetida of Agumbe forest was determined and evaluated for its microbial activity. A total of 170 endophytic isolates were obtained from leaf, stem, seed, and fruit tissues of Nothapodytes foetida. The dominant endophytic fungi belong to genera Fusarium, Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Colletotrichum. Maximum endophytic isolates were obtained from leaves segments followed by fruit, stem, and seed tissues. Hyphomycetes were the dominant group found with 75.29% over other fungal groups. Shannon-Weiner and Simpson indexes showed rich diversity of endophytic fungi suggesting even and uniform occurrence of various species. 88.57%, 74.28%, 62.85%, and 65.71% of isolates have shown activity against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), and Candida albicans (ATCC 69548), respectively. One of the isolate NFX 06 isolated from leaf has showed considerable antimicrobial activity against all the test pathogens. It was identified as Fusarium oxysporum by ITS sequence analysis; the nucleotide sequence was submitted in the GenBank with an accession number KC914432. Phylogenetic relationship confirmed that the strain F. oxysporum NFX 06 has evolved from an endophytic ancestor.

1. Introduction

Endophytes are microbes that colonize living, internal tissues of plants without causing any immediate, overt negative effect [1]. Endophytic fungi represent an important and quantifiable component of fungal diversity, with an estimate of at least 1 million species [24]. They are found in nearly all plant families including bryophytes [5], pteridophytes [6], gymnosperms [7], and both monocotyledonous [8] and dicotyledonous angiosperms [9, 10]. Endophytic fungal community has been found in plants living in a unique ecosystem [11], which can be a source for a variety of bioactive metabolites such as antibiotics, antimycotics, immunosuppressants, and anticancer compounds [12].

The discovery of novel antimicrobial metabolites from endophytes is an important alternative to overcome the increasing levels of drug resistance by plant and human pathogens [1315]. The antimicrobial compounds can be used as drugs and also as food preservatives in the control of food spoilage and foodborne diseases [16]. Thus there is a huge interest across the world to determine the biodiversity of endophytic mycoflora within the host for its novel and undescribed species [17, 18]. In this study an attempt has been made to isolate the endophytic mycoflora of N. foetida, to screen for their antimicrobial activity against selected human pathogens and to determine the phylogenetic relationship of Fusarium sp. 2 NFX06 with other endophytic and pathogenic isolates of different plant species.

2. Materials and Method

2.1. Study Area and Collection of Plant Material

N. foetida, commonly known as “Amrutha” is a medicinal plant that belongs to the family Icacinaceae and it was selected for the study because of its well known pharmacological properties. The plant samples were collected in the month of August from Agumbe forest located at 13°30′′N and 75°2′′E in the Western Ghats, Dakshina Karnataka, India (Figure 1). The plant material was identified and authenticated by an experienced botanist. Fresh and healthy parts of the plant like leaves, stem, seed, and fruits were cut with a sterile scalpel and stored at 4°C in a sterile polythene bag prior to use.

2.2. Isolation and Identification of Endophytic Fungi

Isolation was carried out as described by Wang et al. [19], with little modifications. Plant samples were surface sterilized with 75% ethanol (1 minute) and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (3 minutes) followed by washing with sterile distilled water (2 minutes). Each plant sample was cut aseptically into 0.5 cm long segment and placed on petri dishes containing potato dextrose agar (PDA) supplemented with chloramphenicol (50 μg/mL, Sigma) and streptomycin sulphate (250 μg/mL Sigma). The plates were sealed using Parafilm and incubated at in a light chamber with 12 hours of light followed by 12 hours of dark cycles [20]. The petri dishes were monitored every day to check the growth of endophytic fungal colonies from the plant segments. As and when the hyphal tips emerged out from plant segments they were isolated and subcultured and brought to pure culture by serial subculturing. Identification of fungal endophytes was carried out based on their microscopic and macroscopic characteristics. Lactophenol cotton blue staining method was used for staining the fungal cultures [21] and visualized under microscope (MOTIC BA 400).

2.3. Determination of Species Diversity

Colonization rate (CR) was calculated as the total number of plant tissue segments infected by fungi divided by the total number of segments incubated [22]. Isolation rate (IR) was determined as the number of isolates obtained from plant segments divided by the total number of segments incubated. Colonization frequency (CF %) was calculated as the number of plant segments colonized by a single endophyte divided by the total number of segments observed × 100. Isolation frequency (IF %) was calculated as the total number of isolates of one species divided by the total number of isolates in that sample × 100. Simpson dominance index and Shannon-Wiener’s diversity index were calculated for fungal diversity [23, 24].

Simpson’s index of diversity was calculated using formula as given in the following equation: where is the total number of organisms of a particular species and is the total number of organisms of all species.

Shannon-Wiener diversity index was calculated using the following equation: where is the symbol for the diversity in a sample of species or kinds, is the number of species in the sample, is the relative abundance of th species or kinds measures = , is the total number of individuals of all kinds, is the number of individuals of th species, and ln is the log to base 2.

2.4. Fungal Cultivation and Determination of Antimicrobial Activity
2.4.1. Test Microorganisms

The test microorganisms used in this study included three bacterial strains (S. aureus (ATCC 25923), E. coli (ATCC 25922), and P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853)) and one yeast C. albicans (ATCC 69548). Inoculum of the test microorganisms was adjusted to a McFarland 0.5 standard in optical density corresponding to 1 to  cfu/mL and  cfu/mL for bacteria yeasts were used. The concentrations were confirmed via spectrophotometer readings at 580 and 626 nm, respectively. Yeast samples were inoculated on Sabouraud agar (1% peptone, 4% dextrose, and 2% agar), and the bacteria were plated on Brain Heart Infusion agar (Difco) using a swab.

2.4.2. Fermentation

The fungal fermentation was carried out using 100 mL of potato dextrose broth (PDB) in 250 mL of Erlenmeyer flask inoculated with () mycelial agar plug taken from an actively growing colony on potato dextrose agar plate. It was then incubated at a temperature of 25° ± 1°C and at 120 rpm under light and dark conditions of 12 hours. After 14 days of fermentation the biomass was separated from the broth by filtration using sterilized preweighed filter cloth.

2.4.3. Antimicrobial Screening of Fungal Endophytes

The antimicrobial activity of the fermentation broth was carried out for the 35 endophytic fungal isolates. The fermented broth was sterilized by filtration with 0.22 μm Millipore syringe filters and 50 μL of the broth were tested by modified agar well diffusion assay as described by NCCLS [25]. The antimicrobial activity was assessed by the diameter (mm) of inhibition zones relative to those of positive and negative controls. Streptomycin and Fluconazole were coassayed as positive antimicrobial references with DMSO as negative control.

2.5. PCR Amplification, DNA Sequencing, and Phylogenetic Analysis of Representative Endophytic Fungi

Polymerase chain reaction was performed to amplify specifically the ITS region of the fungal genome. The fungal ITS regions, including the intervening 5.8 S gene and the flanking ITS1 and ITS2, were amplified with universal primers ITS 4 (5′TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC3′) and ITS 5 (5′GGAAGTAAAAGTAACAAGG3′) designed by White et al. [26]. Amplification was performed in a 50 μL reaction mixture containing 28 μL MilliQ Water, 5 μL of 10X Mg free PCR buffer, 2 μL of 25 mM MgCl2, 5 μL of 2.5 mM deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), 2 μL each of 10 μM primers (ITS4 and ITS5), 2 μL of DNA template, 2 μL of 2.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase, and 2 μL of DMSO. The thermal cycle consisted of 3-minute initial denaturation at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of 30-second denaturation at 94°C, 30-second primer annealing at 54°C, 1-minute extension at 72°C, and a final 10-minute extension at 72°C. The PCR products were examined by electrophoresis in 1% (w/v) agarose gel with ethidium bromide (10 mg/mL) with a 100-base-pair ladder and checked for size and purity. The purified PCR product was sequenced using the forward and reverse primer in Applied Biosystems 3130 Genetic Analyser.

The consensus sequence obtained was subjected to BLAST search to assign putative identity, designation of operational taxonomic units based on sequence similarity measures, and phylogenetic inference. It was then aligned with other sequences of endophytic and pathogenic F. oxysporum downloaded from GenBank to determine their possible evolutionary relationship using MEGA program [27].

3. Results and Discussion

Endophytic fungi are known to be ubiquitous in nature and every plant species examined to date has been found colonized with fungal endophytes. It has been found that a single plant species may harbour hundreds of endophytes and may inhabit all available tissues, including leaves, petioles, stems, twigs, bark, xylem, roots, fruit, flowers, and seeds [2830].

3.1. Species Diversity

In the present study a total of 170 isolates of endophytic fungi were recovered from 250 samples of leaf, stem, seed, and fruit of ten N. foetida trees. The population of Zygomycetes and basidiomycetes were totally absent in this study and usually they are isolated in very low numbers in plant endophyte research as reported by Suryanarayanan et al. [31]. Colonization rates (CR %) of leaf, stem, seed, and fruit were found to be (88.0%, 36.0%, 24.0%, and 72.0%) and isolation rates (IR) of leaf, stem, seed, and fruit were found to be (1.1, 0.48, 0.46, and 0.92), respectively (Table 1). It indicates a wide variation between the segments of plants selected. Endophytic fungi were more prevalent on leaf tissue (39.45%) than on stem (16.32%), seed (14.96%), and fruit tissues (29.25%) which comprises 6.47% ascomycetes, 34.70% coelomycetes, 75.29% hyphomycetes, and 1.17% sterile fungi, respectively. Colonization frequency (Table 2) indicates that Colletotrichum sp. 1, Pestalotiopsis sp., Aspergillus flavus, Alternaria sp., Fusarium sp. 1, Fusarium sp. 2, Fusarium sp. 3, and Penicillium sp. 2 were the common isolates found in leaf, stem, seed, and fruit whereas Chaetomium sp., Drechslera sp., and Mycelia sterilia were restricted to the leaf tissues.

Leaf (NFX)Stem (NFS)Seeds (NFB)Fruit (NFT)Total

No. of samples100505050250
No. of samples yielding fungi88181236154
No. of isolates110242346170
Colonization rate (CR %)8836247261.6
Isolation rate (IR)1.10.480.460.920.68

EndophytesLeafCF (%)StemCF (%)SeedCF (%)FruitCF (%)

 Chaetomium sp.22
 Xylaria  sp.6121224
 Colletotrichum sp. 11414121224
 Colletotrichum sp. 23312
 Pestalotiopsis sp.88241236
 Phomopsis sp. 1121224510
 Phomopsis sp. 25536
 Aspergillus  flavus 77364812
 Aspergillus  niger 222448
 Aspergillus  terreus 1212
 Curvularia sp.661212
 Alternaria sp.66241224
 Drechslera sp.11
 Fusarium sp. 188241248
 Fusarium sp. 2661224612
 Fusarium sp. 3441224918
 Trichoderma sp.4424
 Penicillium sp. 1553612
 Penicillium sp. 299484836
Mycelia sterilia
 Morphotype 111
 Morphotype 211

As shown in Table 3, this difference in prevalence may be tissue specific which may be due to their anatomical structure [32, 33]. In the comparative study of twig and leaf-associated endophytes in Quercus ilex [34], the commonest endophytes were found only in leaves, whereas the remainder were found in both leaves and twigs, but no twig-specific taxa were recovered. Similarly no bark specific taxa were found in Kigelia pinnata by Maheswari and Rajagopal [18]. This interestingly coincides with the present study, as there were no stem, seed, or fruit-specific taxa in the overall isolates.

TissueTotal number of taxaTotal number of isolatesSimpson index (I-D)Shannon-Wiener index (Hs)Evenness index


3.2. Effect of Secondary Metabolites of Endophytic Fungi on Selected Pathogens

The endophytic fungi were evaluated for their antimicrobial activity against some clinically significant human pathogens. The fermentation broths of 35 endophytic fungi were screened for antimicrobial activity against three pathogenic bacterial strains, S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa and one yeast C. albicans. 88.57%, 74.28%, 62.85%, and 65.71% of isolates have shown activity against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and C. albicans, respectively.

NFX 06-Fusarium sp. 2, NFX 23-Fusarium sp. 5, and NFB 04-Penicillium sp. 3 isolated from leaves and seeds, respectively, were found to exhibit very good activity against all the pathogenic strains with a zone of inhibition of more than 15 mm. NFX 13-Penicillium sp. 1 and NFX 20-Phomopsis sp. 2 isolated from leaf, NFS 02-Xylaria sp. 4 isolated from stem, and NFB 02-Emericella isolated from seeds have shown a zone of inhibition of about 10 to 15 mm against the bacterial pathogens and more than 15 mm against C. albicans. NFT 01-Pestalotiopsis sp. 3 isolated from fruit have shown zone of inhibition of about 10 to 15 mm against all the tested microorganisms. NFX 09-Phomopsis sp. 1 has shown a zone of inhibition more than 15 mm against S. aureus while showing 10 to 15 mm against all the other tested microorganisms.

NFX 01-Trichoderma sp. 1, NFX 02 -A. niger, NFX 03-A. flavus, NFX 04-Xylaria sp. 1, NFX 05-Fusarium sp. 1, NFX 16-Pestalotiopsis sp. 2, NFX 18-Fusarium sp. 4, NFX 19-Pestalotiopsis sp. 2, and NFX 21-Phomopsis sp. 3 were found to exhibit low activity of less than 10 mm zone of inhibition. According to Fabry et al. [35], the endophytic fungi that showed low antimicrobial activity might possess the active compound in a lesser concentration. And the concentration of these compounds could be enhanced by considering some factors like mode of fermentation, concentration of inoculum, period of incubation, solvents used for extraction, and most importantly purification process [36].

NFX 15-Xylaria sp. 2, NFX 17-Drechslera sp. 1, NFS 01-Xylaria sp. 3, and NFT 05-Lasiodiplodia sp. 1 isolated from leaf, stem, and fruit, respectively, were found to exhibit no activity against the selected human pathogens. Among all the isolates, NFX 06-Fusarium sp. 2 (Figure 2) has shown maximum zone of inhibition, as shown in Table 4, of about 17.7 mm hence further studies were carried out with this isolate.

Endophytic fungal taxa
Strain no.Microorganism tested
S. aureusP. aeruginosa E. coli C. albicans

Alternaria sp. NFX 01++
Aspergillus niger NFX 02++
Aspergillus flavus NFX 03+
Xylaria sp.NFX 04+++
Fusarium sp. 1NFX 05+++++
Fusarium sp. 2NFX 06++++++++++++
Colletotrichum sp. 1NFX 07+++++
Colletotrichum sp. 2NFX 08+++++
Phomopsis sp. 1NFX 09+++++++++
Pestalotiopsis sp. 1NFX 10++++
Pestalotiopsis sp. 1NFX 11+++
Fusarium sp. 2NFX 12++++++
Penicillium sp. 1NFX 13+++++++++
Penicillium sp. 2NFX 14+++++
Xylaria sp.NFX 15
Pestalotiopsis sp. 2NFX 16+
Curvularia sp.NFX 17
Drechslera sp. NFX 18++
Pestalotiopsis sp. 2NFX 19+
Phomopsis sp. 2NFX 20+++++++++
Phomopsis sp. 2NFX 21+
Phomopsis sp. 1NFX 22+++++
Fusarium sp. 1NFX 23++++++++++++

Xylaria sp. NFS 01
Xylaria sp. NFS 02+++++++++
Phomopsis sp. 2NFS 03++++

Aspergillus terreus NFB 01++++
Aspergillus niger NFB 02+++++++++
Colletotrichum sp. 2NFB 03+++++
Penicillium sp. 2NFB 04++++++++++++

Pestalotiopsis sp. 2NFT 01++++++++
Fusarium sp. 2NFT 02+++++++
Colletotrichum sp. 1NFT 03++++++++
Colletotrichum sp. 2NFT 04++++
Xylaria sp.NFT 05

3.3. Phylogenetic Placement of F. oxysporum

Molecular methods to determine the genetic diversity within the species of F. oxysporum [37] and genetic diversity within pathogenic and nonpathogenic isolates with endophytic isolates from various plants [38, 39] and also with other isolates that exist as pathogens, saprophytes, and endophytes [40] have been reported. In this study, an attempt was made to place an endophytic F. oxysporum isolated from N. foetida leaves with other endophytic and pathogenic F. oxysporum of different plant species (Table 5). Phylogenetic tree was generated using maximum parsimony method. The generated tree showed twelve clades and one independent lineage which have descended from a pathogenic F. oxysporum ancestor (Figure 3).

SpeciesNo. of base pairsSource/hostCountryGenbank accession no.

Endophytic isolates
Fusarium oxysporum NFX06510 bpNothapodytes foetida IndiaKC914432*
F. oxysporum AC30594 bpAcorus calamus IndiaGU056168
F. oxysporum f. sp. gladioli UAS007 528 bpNothapodytes nimmoniana IndiaFJ158124.1
F. oxysporum JRE 1497 bpJuniperus recurva IndiaEF591767.1
F. oxysporum D 16 517 bpAnnona squamosa ChinaEF488410.1
F. oxysporum D 17510 bpAnnona squamosa ChinaEF488411.1
F. oxysporum 543 bpScuticaria irwiniana BrazilFJ605247.1
F. oxysporum  UFMGCB 1376543 bpAcianthera teres BrazilFJ605244.1
F. oxysporum F35
515 bpTaxus cuspidata South KoreaAY555719.1
F. oxysporum DC-1-67493 bp
Dracaena cambodiana ChinaFJ449900.1
F. oxysporum EYR11549 bpPinus massoniana ChinaEU888922
F. oxysporum FuO139561 bpSchlumbergera truncata Italy
F. oxysporum CMT6527 bpPhaseolus vulgaris BrazilJQ754006
F. oxysporum 545 bpParis polyphylla var. chinensis ChinaJF776163
F. oxysporum DB0612101515 bpHQ682196
F. oxysporum SFCF20120912-05548 bpPinus thunbergii KoreaKF313101.1
F. oxysporum REF213555 bpEphedra distachya Hungary
F. oxysporum DH-42581 bpRehmannia glutinosa ChinaHM346538.1
F. oxysporum JJ002541 bpGinkgo biloba China
F. oxysporum FOFB62564 bpGrevillea robusta Kenya
F. oxysporum Aug021543 bpPecteilis susannae (L.)  Rafin Thailand

Pathogenic Isolates
F. oxysporum 18P487 bpBean
F. oxysporum f. cubense 115HT569 bpBananaIndiaDQ889176.1
F. oxysporum GXF-6544 bpHybrid bamboo ChinaEU285554.1
F. oxysporum 544544 bpBupleurum chinensis ChinaEU862240
F. oxysporum 515 bpCapsicum annum MexicoAY728210
F. oxysporum nazar 1545 bpAgave tequilana MexicoEU161243
F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum 1ZF1545 bpWatermelonChinaEU588397
F. oxysporum f. sp. lilli FF-2543 bpLilyTaiwanAY684919
F. oxysporum f.sp. vasinfectum F1TP0001542 bpTulipMexicoDQ979010
F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum545 bpCottonChinaEU849584
F. oxysporum R1543 bpAtractylodes ChinaJX885462
F. oxysporum 857564 bpMacrocephala ChinaJN232190
F. oxysporum GLB3567 bpChinaGU136492
F. oxysporum 08YSJG567 bpChinaGU136493
F. oxysporum 527 bpPinus sylvestris SwedenHM036595
F. oxysporum 564 bpGrevillea robusta HQ651161
F. oxysporum 552 bpUKAY147369
F. oxysporum XSD-73570 bpDioscorea collettii var. hypoglauca ChinaEU326215
F. oxysporum XSD-78571 bpPolygonatum sibirilum red ChinaEU326216
F. oxysporum OT0330546 bpRoots of willowsGU934524

Endophytic fungus used in the present study.

The evolutionary relationship of 40 taxa revealed consistency index (0.229865), retention index (0.534473), and composite index (0.122857), respectively, with a tree length of 6295. Clade I showed two clusters with an endophytic F. oxysporum and in Clade II all the isolates were pathogenic F. oxysporum whereas both the clades shared common endophytic ancestor. Clade III has all endophytic descendants with a common endophytic ancestor. Clades IV and VI have two coevolved endophytic isolates with two major clusters giving rise to one pathogenic descendant. Clades VIII and XI have two clusters with all pathogenic isolates. Clades VII and XII have two endophytic isolates and one pathogenic isolate which depicts the possible evolution of a pathogenic strain from an endophytic isolate. Clades IX and X have two clusters each with an endophytic and pathogenic isolate coexisting together which shares a common pathogenic ancestor.

Based on the phylogenetic analysis we hypothesize that endophytic strains have given rise to pathogenic forms. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that there is a great deal of genetic relatedness between pathogenic and nonpathogenic F. oxysporum isolates, which has led some researchers to conclude that some particular pathogenic isolates might have evolved from nonpathogenic strains by mutations involving a few loci [41, 42].

4. Conclusions

However, this is perhaps the first report on endophytic fungal diversity of the endangered medicinal plant N. foetida of Agumbe forest. This study contributes to the understanding of species richness of endophytic fungi in different tissues of the plant like leaf, stem, seed, and fruit. More number of endophytic isolates in leaf tissue may be due to the fact that the sampling was done in a wet season and in many instances leaves sampled during the wet season harboured more endophytes than those screened during the dry season [43, 44]. The rich diversity of Fusarium species as endophytes in different tissues of both the plants may be due to germination of more number of spores of this fungus due to favourable environmental condition. Most of the species isolated comprise mostly Fusarium, Penicillium, Colletotrichum, Pestalotiopsis, Aspergillus, and Alternaria which was in agreement with the results of Jeewon et al. [45] from Antidesma madagascariense. The result of antimicrobial activity indicated that most of the isolates showed varying degree of activity against the selected human test pathogens. Hence the endophytic fungi existing in the plant are potential sources of antimicrobial substances as reported by several researchers [4649]. Among the 35 selected endophytes Fusarium sp. 2 has shown very good activity which was further identified based on ITS sequencing to be F. oxysporum strain NFX06 and submitted in the GenBank with the accession number KC914432. Phylogenetic analysis of the endophytic strain F. oxysporum NFX06 with the other endophytic and pathogenic F. oxysporum indicated that there is a strong relationship between the pathogenic and nonpathogenic F. oxysporum and from the results it was concluded that F. oxysporum NFX06 has evolved from an endophytic ancestor.


The authors are thankful to Manipal Life Science Centre for providing the facilities for identification of endophytic fungus. And they are grateful to retired Professor G. K. Bhat, Poornaprajna College Mangalore, for helping them in finding and authenticating the plant.


  1. C. W. Bacon and J. White, Microbial Endophytes, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  2. M. M. Dreyfuss and I. H. Chapela, “Potential of fungi in the discovery of novel, low molecular weight pharmaceuticals,” in The Discovery of Natural Products With Therapeutic Potential, V. P. Gullo, Ed., pp. 49–80, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, Mass, USA, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  3. A. E. Arnold, Z. Maynard, and G. S. Gilbert, “Fungal endophytes in dicotyledonous neotropical trees: patterns of abundance and diversity,” Mycological Research, vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 1502–1507, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  4. I. R. Sanders, “Plant and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity—are we looking at the relevant levels of diversity and are we using the right techniques?” New Phytologist, vol. 164, no. 3, pp. 415–418, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. M. U'Ren, J. W. Dalling, R. E. Gallery et al., “Diversity and evolutionary origins of fungi associated with seeds of a neotropical pioneer tree: a case study for analysing fungal environmental samples,” Mycological Research, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 432–449, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. O. Petrini, T. N. Sieber, L. Toti, and O. Viret, “Ecology, metabolite production, and substrate utilization in endophytic fungi,” Natural toxins, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 185–196, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  7. G. Soca-Chafre, F. N. Rivera-Orduña, M. E. Hidalgo-Lara, C. Hernandez-Rodriguez, R. Marsch, and L. B. Flores-Cotera, “Molecular phylogeny and paclitaxel screening of fungal endophytes from Taxus globosa,” Fungal Biology, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 143–156, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. U. Pinruan, N. Rungjindamai, R. Choeyklin, S. Lumyong, K. D. Hyde, and E. B. G. Jones, “Occurrence and diversity of basidiomycetous endophytes from the oil palm, Elaeis guineensis in Thailand,” Fungal Diversity, vol. 41, pp. 71–88, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. B. M. Vaz, R. C. Mota, M. R. Q. Bomfim et al., “Antimicrobial activity of endophytic fungi associated with Orchidaceae in Brazil,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 1381–1391, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. L. H. Rosa, M. D. L. Almeida Vieira, I. F. Santiago, and C. A. Rosa, “Endophytic fungi community associated with the dicotyledonous plant Colobanthus quitensis (Kunth) Bartl. (Caryophyllaceae) in Antarctica,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 178–189, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. Strobel, B. Daisy, U. Castillo, and J. Harper, “Natural Products from Endophytic Microorganisms,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 257–268, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. W. Zhang, Y. C. Song, and R. X. Tan, “Biology and chemistry of endophytes,” Natural Product Reports, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 753–771, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J.-H. Song, “What's new on the antimicrobial horizon?” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. S207–S213, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. L. Demain and S. Sanchez, “Microbial drug discovery: 80 Years of progress,” Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 5–16, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. H. Yu, L. Zhang, L. Li et al., “Recent developments and future prospects of antimicrobial metabolites produced by endophytes,” Microbiological Research, vol. 165, no. 6, pp. 437–449, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. X. Liu, M. Dong, X. Chen, M. Jiang, X. Lv, and J. Zhou, “Antimicrobial activity of an endophytic Xylaria sp.YX-28 and identification of its antimicrobial compound 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 241–247, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. P. Narayan, W. K. Kim, S. K. Woo, M. S. Park, and S. H. Yu, “Fungal endophytes in roots of aralia species and their antifungal activity,” Journal of Plant Pathology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 287–294, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Maheswari and K. Rajagopal, “Biodiversity of endophytic fungi in Kigelia pinnata during two different Seasons,” Current Science, vol. 104, pp. 515–518, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  19. F. W. Wang, R. H. Jiao, A. B. Cheng, S. H. Tan, and Y. C. Song, “Antimicrobial potentials of endophytic fungi residing in Quercus variabilis and brefeldin a obtained from Cladosporium sp,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 79–83, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. V. Gangadevi and J. Muthumary, “Taxol, an anticancer drug produced by an endophytic fungus Bartalinia robillardoides Tassi, isolated from a medicinal plant, Aegle marmelos Correa ex Roxb,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 717–724, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. C. Parija, M. R. Shivaprakash, and S. R. Jayakeerthi, “Evaluation of lacto-phenol cotton blue (LPCB) for detection of Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora and Isospora in the wet mount preparation of stool,” Acta Tropica, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 349–354, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. O. Petrini, “Fungal endophytes of tree leaves,” in Microbial Ecology of Leaves, pp. 179–197, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  23. R. W. Poole, An Introduction to Quantitative Ecology, McGraw- Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1974.
  24. J. V. Groth and A. P. Roelfs, “The concept of measurement of phenotypic diversity in Puccinia graminis on wheat,” Phytopathology, vol. 77, pp. 1394–1399, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  25. NCCLS, “Methods for determining bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents,” Approved Guideline M26-A, National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa, USA, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  26. T. J. White, T. Bruns, S. Lee, and J. Taylor, “Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics,” in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White, Eds., pp. 315–322, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  27. K. Tamura, D. Peterson, N. Peterson, G. Stecher, M. Nei, and S. Kumar, “MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2731–2739, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. K. Saikkonen, S. H. Faeth, M. Helander, and T. J. Sullivan, “Fungal endophytes: a continuum of interactions with host plants,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 29, pp. 319–343, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. I. H. Chapela and L. Boddy, “Fungal colonization of attached beech branches. I. Early stages of development of fungal communities,” New Phytologist, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 39–45, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  30. P. J. Fisher, O. Petrini, and B. C. Sutton, “A comparative study of fungal endophytes in leaves, xylem and bark of Eucalyptus in Australia and England,” Sydowia, vol. 45, pp. 338–345, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  31. T. S. Suryanarayanan, V. Kumaresan, and J. A. Johnson, “Foliar fungal endophytes from two species of the mangrove Rhizophora,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1003–1006, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  32. K. Rajagopal and T. S. Suryanarayanan, “Isolation of endophytic fungi from leaves of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.),” Current Science, vol. 78, no. 11, pp. 1375–1378, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  33. S.-Y. Lee, I. Nakajima, F. Ihara, H. Kinoshita, and T. Nihira, “Cultivation of entomopathogenic fungi for the search of antibacterial compounds,” Mycopathologia, vol. 160, no. 4, pp. 321–325, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. P. J. Fisher, O. Petrini, L. E. Petrini, and B. C. Sutton, “Fungal endophytes from the leaves and twigs of Quercus ilex L. from England, Majorca and Switzerland,” New Phytologist, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 133–137, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  35. W. Fabry, P. O. Okemo, and R. Ansorg, “Antibacterial activity of East African medicinal plants,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 79–84, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. P. Powthong, B. Jantrapanukorn, A. Thongmee, and P. Suntornthiticharoen, “Evaluation of endophytic fungi extracts for their antimicrobial activity from Sesbania grandiflora (L.) pers,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Biomedical Research, vol. 3, pp. 132–136, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  37. V. Edel, C. Steinberg, I. Avelange, G. Laguerre, and C. Alabouvette, “Comparison of three molecular methods for the characterization of Fusarium oxysporum strains,” Phytopathology, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 579–585, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  38. K. S. Elais, R. W. Schneider, and M. M. Lear, “Analysis of vegetative compatibility group in nonpathogenic population of Fusarium oxysporum isolated from symptomless tomato root,” Canadian Journal of Botany, vol. 69, pp. 2089–2094, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  39. S. L. Woo, A. Zoina, G. Del Sorbo et al., “Characterization of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. phaseoli by pathogenic races, VCGs, RFLPs, and RAPD,” Phytopathology, vol. 86, no. 9, pp. 966–973, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  40. B. P. Barik, K. Tayung, P. J. Narayan, and S. K. Dutta, “Phylogenetic placement of an endophytic fungus Fusarium oxysporum isolated from Acorus calamus rhizomes with antimicrobial activity,” EJBS, vol. 2, no. 1, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  41. R. P. Baayen, K. O'Donnell, P. J. M. Bonants et al., “Gene genealogies and AFLP analyses in the Fusarium oxysporum complex identify monophyletic and nonmonophyletic formae speciales causing wilt and rot disease,” Phytopathology, vol. 90, no. 8, pp. 891–900, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  42. K. Skovgaard, L. Bødker, and S. Rosendahl, “Population structure and pathogenicity of members of the Fusarium oxysporum complex isolated from soil and root necrosis of pea (Pisum sativum L.),” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 367–374, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. K. F. Rodrigues, “The foliar fungal endophytes of the Amazonian palm Euterpe oleracea,” Mycologia, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 376–385, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  44. D. Wilson and G. C. CarrolL, “Infection studies of Discula quercina, an endophyte of Quercus garryana,” Mycologia, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 635–647, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  45. R. Jeewon, J. Ittoo, D. Mahadeb, Y. J. Fakim, H.-K. Wang, and A.-R. Liu, “DNA based identification and phylogenetic characterisation of endophytic and saprobic Fungi from Antidesma madagascariense, a medicinal plant in mauritius,” Journal of Mycology, vol. 2013, Article ID 781914, 10 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. K. Tayung and D. K. Jha, “Antimicrobial evaluation ofsomefungal endophytes isolated frombarkofHimalayanyew,” World Journal of AgriculturalSciences, vol. 2, pp. 489–494, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  47. J. Mohanta, K. Tayung, and U. B. Mohapatra, “Antimicrobial potentials of endophytic fungi inhabiting three ethnomedicinal plants of similipal biosphere reserve, India,” Internet Journal of Microbiology, vol. 5, no. 2, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  48. S. Padhi and K. Tayung, “Antimicrobial activity and molecular characterization of an endophytic fungus, Quambalaria sp. isolated from Ipomoea carnea,” Annals of Microbiology, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 793–800, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. K. Jena and K. Tayung, “Endophytic fungal communities associated with two ethno-medicinal plants of similipal biosphere reserve, India and their antimicrobial prospective,” Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, vol. 3, p. S7, 2013. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Sogra Fathima Musavi and Raj Mohan Balakrishnan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.