Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nucleic Acids
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 947680, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/947680
Review Article

The Roles of UmuD in Regulating Mutagenesis

1Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, 102 Hurtig Hall, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Complex Systems, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, 102 Hurtig Hall, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Received 13 June 2010; Accepted 1 August 2010

Academic Editor: Ashis Basu

Copyright © 2010 Jaylene N. Ollivierre et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Bagg, C. J. Kenyon, and G. C. Walker, “Inducibility of a gene product required for UV and chemical mutagenesis in Escherichia coli,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 78, no. 9, pp. 5749–5753, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Kato and Y. Shinoura, “Isolation and characterization of mutants of Escherichia coli deficient in induction of mutations by ultraviolet light,” Molecular and General Genetics, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 121–131, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Steinborn, “Uvm mutants of Escherichia coli K12 deficient in UV mutagenesis. I. Isolation of uvm mutants and their phenotypical characterization in DNA repair and mutagenesis,” Molecular and General Genetics, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 87–93, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. C. Friedberg, G. C. Walker, W. Siede, R. D. Wood, R. A. Schultz, and T. Ellenberger, DNA Repair and Mutagenesis, ASM Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2nd edition, 2005.
  5. H. Ohmori, E. C. Friedberg, R. P. P. Fuchs et al., “The Y-family of DNA polymerases,” Molecular Cell, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 7–8, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. F. Jarosz, P. J. Beuning, S. E. Cohen, and G. C. Walker, “Y-family DNA polymerases in Escherichia coli,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 70–77, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Schlacher and M. F. Goodman, “Lessons from 50 years of SOS DNA-damage-induced mutagenesis,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 587–594, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. W. Yang and R. Woodgate, “What a difference a decade makes: insights into translesion DNA synthesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 40, pp. 15591–15598, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Maor-Shoshani, N. B. Reuven, G. Tomer, and Z. Livneh, “Highly mutagenic replication by DNA polymerase V (UmuC) provides a mechanistic basis for SOS untargeted mutagenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 565–570, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. D. McCulloch and T. A. Kunkel, “The fidelity of DNA synthesis by eukaryotic replicative and translesion synthesis polymerases,” Cell Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 148–161, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Kobayashi, M. R. Valentine, P. Pham, M. O'Donnell, and M. F. Goodman, “Fidelity of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV: preferential generation of small deletion mutations by dNTP-stabilized misalignment,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 37, pp. 34198–34207, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. T. Washington, K. D. Carlson, B. D. Freudenthal, and J. M. Pryor, “Variations on a theme: eukaryotic Y-family DNA polymerases,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1804, no. 5, pp. 1113–1123, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. W. Yang, “Damage repair DNA polymerases Y,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. W. Yang, “Portraits of a Y-family DNA polymerase,” FEBS Letters, vol. 579, no. 4, pp. 868–872, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Wagner, P. Gruz, S.-R. Kim et al., “The dinB gene encodes a novel E. coli DNA polymerase, DNA pol IV, involved in mutagenesis,” Molecular Cell, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 281–286, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. B. Reuven, G. Arad, A. Maor-Shoshani, and Z. Livneh, “The mutagenesis protein UmuC is a DNA polymerase activated by UmuD′, RecA, and SSB and is specialized for translesion replication,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 45, pp. 31763–31766, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Tang, X. Shen, E. G. Frank, M. O'Donnell, R. Woodgate, and M. F. Goodman, “UmuD′2C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 16, pp. 8919–8924, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. J. Elledge and G. C. Walker, “Proteins required for ultraviolet light and chemical mutagenesis: identification of the products of the umuC locus of Escherichia coli,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 164, no. 2, pp. 175–192, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. Shinagawa, T. Kato, T. Ise, K. Makino, and A. Nakata, “Cloning and characterization of the umu operon responsible for inducible mutagenesis in Escherichia coli,” Gene, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 167–174, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L. A. Simmons, J. J. Foti, S. E. Cohen, and G. C. Walker, “The SOS regulatory network,” in EcoSal–Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, A. Bock III, R. C. Kaper, J. B. Karp et al., Eds., chapter 5.4.3., ASM Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  21. J. Courcelle, A. Khodursky, B. Peter, P. O. Brown, and P. C. Hanawalt, “Comparative gene expression profiles following UV exposure in wild-type and SOS-deficient Escherichia coli,” Genetics, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 41–64, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Sassanfar and J. W. Roberts, “Nature of the SOS-inducing signal in Escherichia coli. The involvement of DNA replication,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 212, no. 1, pp. 79–96, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. W. Little, “Autodigestion of lexA and phage λ repressors,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 1375–1379, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. B. Neher, J. M. Flynn, R. T. Sauer, and T. A. Baker, “Latent ClpX-recognition signals ensure LexA destruction after DNA damage,” Genes and Development, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1084–1089, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S.-R. Kim, K. Matsui, M. Yamada, P. Gruz, and T. Nohmi, “Roles of chromosomal and episomal dinB genes encoding DNA pol IV in targeted and untargeted mutagenesis in Escherichia coli,” Molecular Genetics and Genomics, vol. 266, no. 2, pp. 207–215, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. Woodgate and D. G. Ennis, “Levels of chromosomally encoded Umu proteins and requirements for in vivo UmuD cleavage,” Molecular and General Genetics, vol. 229, no. 1, pp. 10–16, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. T. Opperman, S. Murli, B. T. Smith, and G. C. Walker, “A model for a umuDC-dependent prokaryotic DNA damage checkpoint,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 16, pp. 9218–9223, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. D. Sutton and G. C. Walker, “umuDC-mediated cold sensitivity is a manifestation of functions of the UmuD2C complex involved in a DNA damage checkpoint control,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 183, no. 4, pp. 1215–1224, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. Marsh and G. C. Walker, “Cold sensitivity induced by overproduction of UmuDC in Escherichia coli,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 155–161, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. V. G. Godoy, D. F. Jarosz, S. M. Simon, A. Abyzov, V. Ilyin, and G. C. Walker, “UmuD and RecA directly modulate the mutagenic potential of the Y family DNA polymerase dinB,” Molecular Cell, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1058–1070, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H. Shinagawa, H. Iwasaki, T. Kato, and A. Nakata, “RecA protein-dependent cleavage of UmuD protein and SOS mutagenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1806–1810, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T. Nohmi, J. R. Battista, L. A. Dodson, and G. C. Walker, “RecA-mediated cleavage activates UmuD for mutagenesis: mechanistic relationship between transcriptional derepression and posttranslational activation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1816–1820, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. E. Burckhardt, R. Woodgate, R. H. Scheuermann, and H. Echols, “UmuD mutagenesis protein of Escherichia coli: overproduction, purification, and cleavage by RecA,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1811–1815, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Paetzel and N. C. J. Strynadka, “Common protein architecture and binding sites in proteases utilizing a Ser/Lys dyad mechanism,” Protein Science, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 2533–2536, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. N. Slilaty, J. A. Rupley, and J. W. Little, “Intramolecular cleavage of LexA and phage λ repressors: dependence of kinetics on repressor concentration, pH, temperature, and solvent,” Biochemistry, vol. 25, no. 22, pp. 6866–6875, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. P. McDonald, T. S. Peat, A. S. Levine, and R. Woodgate, “Intermolecular cleavage by UmuD-like enzymes: identification of residues required for cleavage and substrate specificity,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 285, no. 5, pp. 2199–2209, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. P. McDonald, E. G. Frank, A. S. Levine, and R. Woodgate, “Intermolecular cleavage by UmuD-like mutagenesis proteins,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 1478–1483, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. P. McDonald, E. E. Maury, A. S. Levine, and R. Woodgate, “Regulation of UmuD cleavage: role of the amino-terminal tail,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 282, no. 4, pp. 721–730, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. I. Bruck, R. Woodgate, K. McEuntee, and M. F. Goodman, “Purification of a soluble UmuD′C complex from Escherichia coli: cooperative binding of UmuD′C to single-stranded DNA,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 18, pp. 10767–10774, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R. Woodgate, M. Rajagopalan, C. Lu, and H. Echols, “UmuC mutagenesis protein of Escherichia coli: purification and interaction with UmuD and UmuD′,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 86, no. 19, pp. 7301–7305, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. W. M. Rehrauer, P. E. Lavery, E. L. Palmer, R. N. Singh, and S. C. Kowalczykowskit, “Interaction of Escherichia coli RecA protein with LexA repressor. I. LexA repressor cleavage is competitive with binding of a secondary DNA molecule,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 39, pp. 23865–23873, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. Sommer, A. Bailone, and R. Devoret, “The appearance of the UmuD′C protein complex in Escherichia coli switches repair from homologous recombination to SOS mutagenesis,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 963–971, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. H. Szpilewska, P. Bertrand, A. Bailone, and M. Dutreix, “In vitro inhibition of RecA-mediated homologous pairing by UmuD′C proteins,” Biochimie, vol. 77, no. 11, pp. 848–853, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. E. Ferentz, G. C. Walker, and G. Wagner, “Converting a DNA damage checkpoint effector (UmuD2C) into a lesion bypass polymerase (UmuD′2C),” EMBO Journal, vol. 20, no. 15, pp. 4287–4298, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. E. Ferentz, T. Opperman, G. C. Walker, and G. Wagner, “Dimerization of the UmuD′ protein in solution and its implications for regulation of SOS mutagenesis,” Nature Structural Biology, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 979–983, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. T. S. Peat, E. G. Frank, J. P. McDonald, A. S. Levine, R. Woodgate, and W. A. Hendrickson, “Structure of the UmuD′ protein and its regulation in response to DNA damage,” Nature, vol. 380, no. 6576, pp. 727–730, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. D. Sutton, A. Guzzo, I. Narumi et al., “A model for the structure of the Escherichia coli SOS-regulated UmuD2 protein,” DNA Repair, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 77–93, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. S. M. Simon, F. J. R. Sousa, R. Mohana-Borges, and G. C. Walker, “Regulation of Escherichia coli SOS mutagenesis by dimeric intrinsically disordered umuD gene products,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 1152–1157, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. H. Lee and G. C. Walker, “Interactions of Escherichia coli UmuD with activated RecA analyzed by cross-linking UmuD monocysteine derivatives,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 178, no. 24, pp. 7285–7294, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. E. G. Frank, N. Cheng, C. C. Do et al., “Visualization of two binding sites for the Escherichia coli UmuD′2C complex (DNA pol V) on RecA-ssDNA filaments,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 297, no. 3, pp. 585–597, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. Fang, K. D. Rand, M. C. Silva, T. E. Wales, J. R. Engen, and P. J. Beuning, “Conformational dynamics of the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase manager proteins UmuD and UmuD′,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 398, no. 1, pp. 40–53, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. P. J. Beuning, S. M. Simon, A. Zemla, D. Barsky, and G. C. Walker, “A non-cleavable UmuD variant that acts as a UmuD′ mimic,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 14, pp. 9633–9640, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. D. Sutton, I. Narumi, and G. C. Walker, “Posttranslational modification of the umuD-encoded subunit of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase V regulates its interactions with the β processivity clamp,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 8, pp. 5307–5312, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. D. Sutton, M. Kim, and G. C. Walker, “Genetic and biochemical characterization of a novel umuD mutation: insights into a mechanism for UmuD self-cleavage,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 183, no. 1, pp. 347–357, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. R. Battista, T. Ohta, T. Nohmi, W. Sun, and G. C. Walker, “Dominant negative umuD mutations decreasing RecA-mediated cleavage suggest roles for intact UmuD in modulation of SOS mutagenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 18, pp. 7190–7194, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. T. S. Peat, E. G. Frank, J. P. McDonald, A. S. Levine, R. Woodgate, and W. A. Hendrickson, “The UmuD′ protein filament and its potential role in damage induced mutagenesis,” Structure, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1401–1412, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. Z. Kelman and M. O'Donnell, “DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: structure and function of a chromosomal replicating machine,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 64, pp. 171–200, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. C. S. McHenry, “Chromosomal replicases as asymmetric dimers: studies of subunit arrangement and functional consequences,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1157–1165, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. S. Fujii, V. Gasser, and R. P. Fuchs, “The biochemical requirements of DNA polymerase V-mediated translesion synthesis revisited,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 341, no. 2, pp. 405–417, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. S. Fujii, A. Isogawa, and R. P. Fuchs, “RecFOR proteins are essential for Pol V-mediated translesion synthesis and mutagenesis,” EMBO Journal, vol. 25, no. 24, pp. 5754–5763, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. M. D. Sutton, T. Opperman, and G. C. Walker, “The Escherichia coli SOS mutagenesis proteins UmuD and UmuD′ interact physically with the replicative DNA polymerase,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 22, pp. 12373–12378, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. M. D. Sutton, S. Murli, T. Opperman, C. Klein, and G. C. Walker, “umuDC-dnaQ interaction and its implications for cell cycle regulation and SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 183, no. 3, pp. 1085–1089, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. S. A. Taft-Benz and R. M. Schaaper, “The C-terminal domain of DnaQ contains the polymerase binding site,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 181, no. 9, pp. 2963–2965, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. M. D. Sutton, M. F. Farrow, B. M. Burton, and G. C. Walker, “Genetic interactions between the Escherichia coli umuDC gene products and the β processivity clamp of the replicative DNA polymerase,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 183, no. 9, pp. 2897–2909, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. P. J. Beuning, S. Chan, L. S. Waters, H. Addepalli, J. N. Ollivierre, and G. C. Walker, “Characterization of novel alleles of the Escherichia coli umuDC genes identifies additional interaction sites of UmuC with the beta clamp,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 191, no. 19, pp. 5910–5920, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. J. M. Duzen, G. C. Walker, and M. D. Sutton, “Identification of specific amino acid residues in the E. coliβ processivity clamp involved in interactions with DNA polymerase III, UmuD and UmuD′,” DNA Repair, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 301–312, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. B. P. Dalrymple, K. Kongsuwan, G. Wijffels, N. E. Dixon, and P. A. Jennings, “A universal protein-protein interaction motif in the eubacterial DNA replication and repair systems,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 20, pp. 11627–11632, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. D. Y. Burnouf, V. Olieric, J. Wagner et al., “Structural and biochemical analysis of sliding clamp/ligand interactions suggest a competition between replicative and translesion DNA polymerases,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 335, no. 5, pp. 1187–1197, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. M. H. Heltzel, R. W. Maul, S. K. Scouten Ponticelli, and M. D. Sutton, “A model for DNA polymerase switching involving a single cleft and the rim of the sliding clamp,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 31, pp. 12664–12669, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. J. M. H. Heltzel, S. K. Scouten Ponticelli, L. H. Sanders et al., “Sliding clamp-DNA interactions are required for viability and contribute to DNA polymerase management in Escherichia coli,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 387, no. 1, pp. 74–91, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. R. W. Maul, S. K. Scouten Ponticelli, J. M. Duzen, and M. D. Sutton, “Differential binding of Escherichia coli DNA polymerases to the β-sliding clamp,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 811–827, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. S. K. Scouten Ponticelli, J. M. Duzen, and M. D. Sutton, “Contributions of the individual hydrophobic clefts of the Escherichia coliβ sliding clamp to clamp loading, DNA replication and clamp recycling,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 2796–2809, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. M. D. Sutton and J. M. Duzen, “Specific amino acid residues in the β sliding clamp establish a DNA polymerase usage hierarchy in Escherichia coli,” DNA Repair, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 312–323, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. G. Wijffels, B. P. Dalrymple, P. Prosselkov et al., “Inhibition of protein interactions with the β2 sliding clamp of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III by peptides from β2-binding proteins,” Biochemistry, vol. 43, no. 19, pp. 5661–5671, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. M. Tang, P. Pham, X. Shen et al., “Roles of E. coli DNA polymerases IV and V in lesion-targeted and untargeted SOS mutagenesis,” Nature, vol. 404, no. 6781, pp. 1014–1018, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. L. B. Bloom, X. Chen, D. K. Fygenson, J. Turner, M. O'Donnell, and M. F. Goodman, “Fidelity of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: the effects of β, γ complex processivity proteins and ε proofreading exonuclease on nucleotide misincorporation efficiencies,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 44, pp. 27919–27930, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. N. B. Reuven, G. Tomer, and Z. Livneh, “The mutagenesis proteins UmuD′ and UmuC prevent lethal frameshifts while increasing base substitution mutations,” Molecular Cell, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 191–199, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. S. Fujii and R. P. Fuchs, “Defining the position of the switches between replicative and bypass DNA polymerases,” EMBO Journal, vol. 23, no. 21, pp. 4342–4352, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. O. J. Becherel and R. P. P. Fuchs, “SOS mutagenesis results from up-regulation of translesion synthesis,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 294, no. 2, pp. 299–306, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. K. Schlacher, K. Leslie, C. Wyman, R. Woodgate, M. M. Cox, and M. F. Goodman, “DNA polymerase V and RecA protein, a minimal mutasome,” Molecular Cell, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 561–572, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. K. Schlacher, M. M. Cox, R. Woodgate, and M. F. Goodman, “RecA acts in trans to allow replication of damaged DNA by DNA polymerase V,” Nature, vol. 442, no. 7105, pp. 883–887, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. A. Maor-Shoshani and Z. Livneh, “Analysis of the stimulation of DNA polymerase V of Escherichia coli by processivity proteins,” Biochemistry, vol. 41, no. 48, pp. 14438–14446, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. N. B. Reuven, G. Arad, A. Z. Stasiak, A. Stasiak, and Z. Livneh, “Lesion bypass by the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase V requires assembly of a RecA nucleoprotein filament,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 8, pp. 5511–5517, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. P. Pham, E. M. Seitz, S. Saveliev et al., “Two distinct modes of RecA action are required for DNA polymerase V-catalyzed translesion synthesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 17, pp. 11061–11066, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. Q. Jiang, K. Karata, R. Woodgate, M. M. Cox, and M. F. Goodman, “The active form of DNA polymerase v is UmuD′ 2 C-RecA-ATP,” Nature, vol. 460, no. 7253, pp. 359–363, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. G. Arad, A. Hendel, C. Urbanke, U. Curth, and Z. Livneh, “Single-stranded DNA-binding protein recruits DNA polymerase V to primer termini on RecA-coated DNA,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 13, pp. 8274–8282, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. M. Rajagopalan, C. Lu, R. Woodgate, M. O'Donnell, M. F. Goodman, and H. Echols, “Activity of the purified mutagenesis proteins UmuC, UmuD′, and RecA in replicative bypass of an abasic DNA lesion by DNA polymerase III,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 89, no. 22, pp. 10777–10781, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. R. Woodgate, M. Rajagopalan, C. Lu, and H. Echols, “UmuC mutagenesis protein of Escherichia coli: purification and interaction with UmuD and UmuD′,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 86, no. 19, pp. 7301–7305, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. P. Jonczyk and A. Nowicka, “Specific in vivo protein-protein interactions between Escherichia coli SOS mutagenesis proteins,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 178, no. 9, pp. 2580–2585, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. M. Rajagopalan, C. Lu, R. Woodgate, M. O'Donnell, M. F. Goodman, and H. Echols, “Activity of the purified mutagenesis proteins UmuC, UmuD′, and RecA in replicative bypass of an abasic DNA lesion by DNA polymerase III,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 89, no. 22, pp. 10777–10781, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. I. Bruck, R. Woodgate, K. McEuntee, and M. F. Goodman, “Purification of a soluble UmuD′C complex from Escherichia coli: cooperative binding of UmuD′C to single-stranded DNA,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 18, pp. 10767–10774, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. C. J. Kenyon and G. C. Walker, “DNA-damaging agents stimulate gene expression at specific loci in Escherichia coli,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 2819–2823, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. B. S. Strauss, R. Roberts, L. Francis, and P. Pouryazdanparast, “Role of the dinB gene product in spontaneous mutation in Escherichia coli with an impaired replicative polymerase,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 182, no. 23, pp. 6742–6750, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. S. Kobayashi, M. R. Valentine, P. Pham, M. O'Donnell, and M. F. Goodman, “Fidelity of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV. Preferential generation of small deletion mutations by dNTP-stabilized misalignment,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 37, pp. 34198–34207, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. J. Wagner, P. Gruz, S.-R. Kim et al., “The dinB gene encodes a novel E. coli DNA polymerase, DNA pol IV, involved in mutagenesis,” Molecular Cell, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 281–286, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. S.-R. Kim, K. Matsui, M. Yamada, P. Gruz, and T. Nohmi, “Roles of chromosomal and episomal dinB genes encoding DNA pol IV in targeted and untargeted mutagenesis in Escherichia coli,” Molecular Genetics and Genomics, vol. 266, no. 2, pp. 207–215, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. D. F. Jarosz, V. G. Godoy, J. C. Delaney, J. M. Essigmann, and G. C. Walker, “A single amino acid governs enhanced activity of dinB DNA polymerases on damaged templates,” Nature, vol. 439, no. 7073, pp. 225–228, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. R. Napolitano, R. Janel-Bintz, J. Wagner, and R. P. P. Fuchs, “All three SOS-inducible DNA polymerases (Pol II, Pol IV and Pol V) are involved in induced mutagenesis,” EMBO Journal, vol. 19, no. 22, pp. 6259–6265, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. N. Lenne-Samuel, R. Janel-Bintz, A. Kolbanovskiy, N. E. Geacintov, and R. P. P. Fuchs, “The processing of a Benzo(a)pyrene adduct into a frameshift or a base substitution mutation requires a different set of genes in Escherichia coli,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 299–307, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. J. J. Foti, A. M. DeLucia, C. M. Joyce, and G. C. Walker, “UmuD2 inhibits a non-covalent step during dinB-mediated template slippage on homopolymeric nucleotide runs,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 30, pp. 23086–23095, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. P. J. Beuning, S. M. Simon, V. G. Godoy, D. F. Jarosz, and G. C. Walker, “Characterization of Escherichia coli translesion synthesis polymerases and their accessory factors,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 408, pp. 318–340, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. H. Ling, F. Boudsocq, R. Woodgate, and W. Yang, “Crystal structure of a Y-family DNA polymerase in action: a mechanism for error-prone and lesion-bypass replication,” Cell, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 91–102, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. M. Gonzalez and R. Woodgate, “The “tale” of umuD and its role in SOS mutagenesis,” BioEssays, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 141–148, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. E. G. Frank, D. G. Ennis, M. Gonzalez, A. S. Levine, and R. Woodgate, “Regulation of SOS mutagenesis by proteolysis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 19, pp. 10291–10296, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. S. Gottesman, W. P. Clark, V. De Crecy-Lagard, and M. R. Maurizi, “ClpX, an alternative subunit for the ATP-dependent Clp protease of Escherichia coli. Sequence and in vivo activities,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 268, no. 30, pp. 22618–22626, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. M. R. Maurizi, W. P. Clark, Y. Katayama et al., “Sequence and structure of Clp P, the proteolytic component of the ATP-dependent Clp protease of Escherichia coli,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265, no. 21, pp. 12536–12545, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. Y.-I. Kim, R. E. Burton, B. M. Burton, R. T. Sauer, and T. A. Baker, “Dynamics of substrate denaturation and translocation by the ClpXP degradation machine,” Molecular Cell, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 639–648, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. S. K. Singh, R. Grimaud, J. R. Hoskins, S. Wickner, and M. R. Maurizi, “Unfolding and internalization of proteins by the ATP-dependent proteases ClpXP and ClpAP,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 16, pp. 8898–8903, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. J. Wang, J. A. Hartling, and J. M. Flanagan, “The structure of ClpP at 2.3 Å resolution suggests a model for ATP-dependent proteolysis,” Cell, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 447–456, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. C. K. Smith, T. A. Baker, and R. T. Sauer, “Lon and Clp family proteases and chaperones share homologous substrate-recognition domains,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 12, pp. 6678–6682, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. M. Gonciarz-Swiatek, A. Wawrzynow, S.-J. Um et al., “Recognition, targeting, and hydrolysis of the λ O replication protein by the ClpP/ClpX protease,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 20, pp. 13999–14005, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. J. M. Flynn, S. B. Neher, Y.-I. Kim, R. T. Sauer, and T. A. Baker, “Proteomic discovery of cellular substrates of the ClpXP protease reveals five classes of ClpX-recognition signals,” Molecular Cell, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 671–683, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. K. R. Marshall-Batty and H. Nakai, “trans-targeting of the phage Mu repressor is promoted by conformational changes that expose its ClpX recognition determinant,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 3, pp. 1612–1617, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. S. B. Neher, J. M. Flynn, R. T. Sauer, and T. A. Baker, “Latent ClpX-recognition signals ensure LexA destruction after DNA damage,” Genes and Development, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1084–1089, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. B. M. Burton, T. L. Williams, and T. A. Baker, “ClpX-mediated remodeling of Mu transpososomes: selective unfolding of subunits destabilizes the entire complex,” Molecular Cell, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 449–454, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. J. A. Kenniston, T. A. Baker, J. M. Fernandez, and R. T. Sauer, “Linkage between ATP consumption and mechanical unfolding during the protein processing reactions of an AAA+ degradation machine,” Cell, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 511–520, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. A. W. Karzai, E. D. Roche, and R. T. Sauer, “The SsrA-SmpB system for protein tagging, directed degradation and ribosome rescue,” Nature Structural Biology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 449–455, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. D. Dulebohn, J. Choy, T. Sundermeier, N. Okan, and A. W. Karzai, “Trans-translation: the tmRNA-mediated surveillance mechanism for ribosome rescue, directed protein degradation, and nonstop mRNA decay,” Biochemistry, vol. 46, no. 16, pp. 4681–4693, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. I. Levchenko, R. A. Grant, D. A. Wah, R. T. Sauer, and T. A. Baker, “Structure of a delivery protein for an AAA+ protease in complex with a peptide degradation tag,” Molecular Cell, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 365–372, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. I. Levchenko, M. Seidel, R. T. Sauer, and T. A. Baker, “A specificity-enhancing factor for the ClpXP degradation machine,” Science, vol. 289, no. 5488, pp. 2354–2356, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. D. A. Wah, I. Levchenko, T. A. Baker, and R. T. Sauer, “Characterization of a specificity factor for an AAA+ ATPase: assembly of SspB dimers with ssrA-tagged proteins and the ClpX hexamer,” Chemistry and Biology, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1237–1245, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. D. A. Wah, I. Levchenko, G. E. Rieckhof, D. N. Bolon, T. A. Baker, and R. T. Sauer, “Flexible linkers leash the substrate binding domain of SspB to a peptide module that stabilizes delivery complexes with the AAA+ ClpXP protease,” Molecular Cell, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 355–363, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. S. B. Neher, R. T. Sauer, and T. A. Baker, “Distinct peptide signals in the UmuD and UmuD′ subunits of UmuD/D′ mediate tethering and substrate processing by the ClpXP protease,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 23, pp. 13219–13224, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. M. Gonzalez, F. Rasulova, M. R. Maurizi, and R. Woodgate, “Subunit-specific degradation of the UmuD/D′ heterodimer by the ClpXP protease: the role of trans recognition in UmuD′ stability,” EMBO Journal, vol. 19, no. 19, pp. 5251–5258, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. M. Gonzalez, E. G. Frank, A. S. Levine, and R. Woodgate, “Lon-mediated proteolysis of the Escherichia coli UmuD mutagenesis protein: in vitro degradation and identification of residues required for proteolysis,” Genes and Development, vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 3889–3899, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. M. D. Sutton, “Damage signals triggering the Escherichia coli SOS response,” in DNA Damage and Recognition, Y. W. K. Wolfram Seide and P. W. Doetsch, Eds., pp. 781–802, Taylor & Francis, New York, NY, USA, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  127. O. J. Becherel, R. P. P. Fuchs, and J. Wagner, “Pivotal role of the β-clamp in translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis in E. coli cells,” DNA Repair, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 703–708, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. P. J. Beuning, D. Sawicka, D. Barsky, and G. C. Walker, “Two processivity clamp interactions differentially alter the dual activities of UmuC,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 460–474, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. K. A. Bunting, S. M. Roe, and L. H. Pearl, “Structural basis for recruitment of translesion DNA polymerase Pol IV/dinB to the β-clamp,” EMBO Journal, vol. 22, no. 21, pp. 5883–5892, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. P. R. Dohrmann and C. S. McHenry, “A bipartite polymerase-processivity factor interaction: only the internal β binding site of the α subunit is required for processive replication by the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 350, no. 2, pp. 228–239, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. D. Jeruzalmi, O. Yurieva, Y. Zhao et al., “Mechanism of processivity clamp opening by the delta subunit wrench of the clamp loader complex of E. coli DNA polymerase III,” Cell, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 417–428, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. F. J. López de Saro and M. O'Donnell, “Interaction of the β sliding clamp with MutS, ligase, and DNA polymerase I,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 15, pp. 8376–8380, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. M. Kurz, B. Dalrymple, G. Wijffels, and K. Kongsuwan, “Interaction of the sliding clamp β-subunit and Hda, a DnaA-related protein,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 186, no. 11, pp. 3508–3515, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus