Journal of Nucleic Acids

Journal of Nucleic Acids / 2011 / Article
Special Issue

Using Chemical Approaches to Understand RNA Structure and Function in Biology

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 408053 |

Isabelle Behm-Ansmant, Mark Helm, Yuri Motorin, "Use of Specific Chemical Reagents for Detection of Modified Nucleotides in RNA", Journal of Nucleic Acids, vol. 2011, Article ID 408053, 17 pages, 2011.

Use of Specific Chemical Reagents for Detection of Modified Nucleotides in RNA

Academic Editor: Dmitry A. Stetsenko
Received15 Oct 2010
Accepted24 Jan 2011
Published13 Apr 2011


Naturally occurring cellular RNAs contain an impressive number of chemically distinct modified residues which appear posttranscriptionally, as a result of specific action of the corresponding RNA modification enzymes. Over 100 different chemical modifications have been identified and characterized up to now. Identification of the chemical nature and exact position of these modifications is typically based on 2D-TLC analysis of nucleotide digests, on HPLC coupled with mass spectrometry, or on the use of primer extension by reverse transcriptase. However, many modified nucleotides are silent in reverse transcription, since the presence of additional chemical groups frequently does not change base-pairing properties. In this paper, we give a summary of various chemical approaches exploiting the specific reactivity of modified nucleotides in RNA for their detection.

1. Introduction

Native cellular RNAs contain numerous modified residues resulting from specific action of various RNA modification enzymes. These RNA modifications are ubiquitous in nature, but the specific modification profile varies depending on the organism. Over 100 chemically distinct modified nucleotides have been identified so far mostly in tRNAs, rRNAs, snRNAs and some snoRNAs. From the chemical point of view, these modifications are highly diverse and almost any position of the nucleobases as well as the 2′-OH of the ribose has been found to be a target of modification enzymes (see Table 1 and below) [13].

NumberSymbolCommon name

(1)m1A 1-methyladenosine
(4)Am -O-methyladenosine
(7)ms2i6A 2-methylthio- N6 -isopentenyladenosine
(9)ms2io6A2-methylthio-N6-(cis-hydroxyisopentenyl) adenosine
(10)g6A N 6-glycinylcarbamoyladenosine
(11)t6A N 6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine
(12)ms2t6A 2-methylthio-N -threonyl carbamoyladenosine
(13)m6t6A N 6-methyl-N -threonylcarbamoyladenosine
(14)h A N 6-hydroxynorvalylcarbamoyladenosine
(15)ms2h A 2-methylthio-N -hydroxynorvalyl carbamoyladenosine
(16)Ar(p)2′-O-ribosyladenosine (phosphate)
(20)m3C 3-methylcytidine
(21)m5C 5-methylcytidine
(22)Cm 2 -O-methylcytidine
(23)s2C 2-thiocytidine
(24)ac4C N 4-acetylcytidine
(27)ac4CmN 4-acetyl-2′-O-methylcytidine
(28)k2C lysidine
(31)m7G 7-methylguanosine
(32)Gm 2 -O-methylguanosine
(36)Gr(p)2′-O-ribosylguanosine (phosphate)
(37)yW wybutosine
(40)OHyW*undermodified hydroxywybutosine
(52)m5U 5-methyluridine
(53)Um 2 -O-methyluridine
(57)s2U 2-thiouridine
(58)s4U 4-thiouridine
(61)acp3U 3-(3-amino-3-carboxypropyl)uridine
(64)cmo5Uuridine 5-oxyacetic acid
(65)mcmo5Uuridine 5-oxyacetic acid methyl ester
(66)chm5U 5-(carboxyhydroxymethyl)uridine
(67)mchm5U5-(carboxyhydroxymethyl)uridine methyl ester
(77)cmnm5U 5-carboxymethylaminomethyluridine
(78)cmnm5Um 5-carboxymethylaminomethyl-2 -O-methyluridine
(79)cmnm5s2U 5-carboxymethylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine
(86)m1acp3Ψ 1-methyl-3-(3-amino-3-carboxypropyl) pseudouridine
(98)τm5U 5-taurinomethyluridine
(99)τm5s2U 5-taurinomethyl-2-thiouridine
(107)m42CmN4, N4,2 -O-trimethylcytidine

Numbering and abbreviations of modified nucleosides are from “The RNA modification Database,”

Identification of the chemical nature and localization of the modified nucleotides even in highly abundant RNAs represents a laborious and time-consuming task. Moreover, the analysis of low abundant cellular RNAs is extremely difficult due to limited access to highly purified RNA species required for most types of analysis, like HPLC or mass spectrometry [47]. One alternative to this consists in direct analysis of underrepresented RNA species in total cellular RNA by reverse transcription (RT) using specific DNA primers [8]. This generally allows the sequencing of a given RNA, but the information on its modified nucleotide content is still missing. The use of specific chemical reagents reviewed in this survey explores the particular reactivity of a given modified residue and may considerably help in the interpretation of an RT profile. Another area for the use of specific chemical reactions is RNA analysis and sequencing by various types of mass spectrometry (MS), where modified residues undergo particular fragmentation pathways and their derivatization helps in identification.

2. General Reactivity of Unmodified Nucleotides

Detection of nucleotide modifications is based on either of three basic principles. For two of these, that is, separation according to physicochemical properties and differential enzymatic turnover, we refer to other reviews [4, 7, 912] and will mention such methods only when they are combined with the use of chemicals that specifically react with modified nucleotides. Here, we focus on the third principle, which is differential chemical reactivity. To set the stage, we will outline the known reactivity of the four major ribonucleotides in this paragraph. In principle, any reagent that reacts with nucleotides may be considered for chemical recognition of nucleotide modification, provided that conditions can be determined, where its reactivity significantly differs between a given major nucleotide and its modified counterpart. In the best case, conditions would be optimized to the point of exclusive reaction with either the standard or the modification. From a practical point of view, it is helpful to distinguish reagents within a narrowly defined window of experimental conditions from those which reliably and completely discriminate nucleotides over a wide plateau of experimental conditions. The former methods are evidently more difficult to newly establish in a laboratory, despite the emergence of numerous publications covering detailed protocols, and should by tackled only by experienced RNA scientists. However, even for the less complicated reactions, one should be conscious that deviations in temperature, pH, salt, incubation time, or reagent concentration may result in “leaving” the plateau and thus result in suboptimal discrimination. Similar considerations apply to the detection of the chemical species resulting for treatment with the discriminating reagent. Most often, the ease and turnaround time of detection will determine if a given reagent finds widespread use in the RNA community.

The above considerations apply to reagents of various types alike, which we have grouped into electrophiles, nucleophiles, and oxidizing, and reducing agents.

2.1. Electrophilic Reagents

Nitrogen atoms in purine and pyrimidine rings of nucleobases show varying degrees of nucleophilicity and thus react differentially with various electrophilic compounds, which are typically alkylating or acylating agents (Figure 1).

These reactivities have been explored decades ago and form the basis of chemical sequencing of end-labeled nucleic acids according to Maxam and Gilbert [1315]. Methylating agents, in particular dimethylsulfate (DMS), preferentially alkylate the N1 of adenosines, the N7 of guanosines, and the N3 of cytidines. All three sites are also found to be enzymatically methylated in vivo, and the methods used for sequencing of chemical probing of RNA structure can also be applied to reveal these naturally occurring modifications. An important property of many modified nucleotides is that they render oligonucleotides susceptible to chain scission via β-elimination, provided that the modification itself or an auxiliary chemical treatment ablates aromaticity of the base or leads to abasic sites. β-elimination is induced by heating of RNA with aniline at low pH. Additional treatment of m3C with hydrazine and of m7G [16], dihydrouridine, and wybutosine with sodium borohydride (NaBH4) leads to abasic sites in RNA which are susceptible to aniline cleavage. The wybutosine base is also acid-labile and will undergo depurination upon treatment with hydrochloric acid to leave an abasic site [17]. To date, there is no satisfactory protocol to chemically reveal the presence of N1-methyladenosine in RNA, which therefore has to be detected by RT-based methods, as will be detailed below.

Other popular electrophilic agents that react with nitrogens include diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC, N7 of adenosine) and ethylnitrosourea, which alkylates all nitrogens in addition to phosphates and all oxygens in nucleic acids [18]. N,N-(dimethylamino) dimethylchlorosilane (DMAS-Cl) reacts with the N2 of guanosines [19]. Certain reagents gain in specificity due to the presence of two electrophilic groups, for example, chloroacetaldehyde (N1-A, N6-A N3-C, N4-C) [20, 21], chlorotetrolic (4-chloro-2-butynoic) acid ester (N1-A, N6-A N3-C, N4-C) [22], and glyoxal and kethoxal (N1-G, N2-G) [23, 24]. Finally, carbodiimides, in particular 1-cyclohexyl-3-(2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl) carbodiimide tosylate (CMCT), acylate the N3 of uridines and the N1 and N2 of guanosines, as well as both nitrogens in pseudouridine and N3 in inosine. Its use for the mapping of Ψ residues will be detailed below.

2.2. Oxidizing Agents

As electron poor species, oxidizing agents share certain properties and also target moieties with alkylating agents. Nitrosyl cations and related species react with exocyclic nitrogens in cytidine, adenosine and guanosine to form diazonium compounds, which eventually hydrolyze and yield the corresponding deamination products: uridine, inosine, and xanthene, respectively. Monoperphtalic acid was reported to oxidize adenosine to yield adenosine 1-N-oxide [25]. The Δ5,6 double bonds in pyrimidines can in principle be oxidized by hydrogen peroxide although permanganate and in particular osmium-VIII compounds are most frequently used (reviewed in [26]).

Radical generating species, including Fenton reagents [27], copper phenantroline [28, 29] and peroxonitrous acid [30] are known to abstract hydrogens from CH bonds in the ribose. So far, this is the only type of reactivity that has not been exploited for the detection of nucleotide modifications. This type of reagents also causes the formation of 8-oxo-guanosine, which is the major lesion in oxidative damage of DNA [31].

2.3. Nucleophilic and Reducing Reagents

In pyrimidines, the Δ5,6 double bond is part of a Michael acceptor, which can be attacked in the 6 position by strong nucleophiles such as, bisulfite, hydrazine, methoxamine, hydroxylamine [3234], and bisulfite [3537] but also by KI/TiCl3 [38]. NaBH4 will act only on methylated N3-C, as pointed out already.

The C4 position is also electrophilic, but typically less reactive than the Michael acceptor electrophile C6. Nucleophilic attack here is known from the bidentate hydrazine [39], or a combination of bisulfate and a semicarbazide [40]. In both cases, the first nucleophilic attack occurs at the C6, and only then does the C4 position react [33, 39]. Using hydrogen sulfide under high pressure, cytidines can be converted into s4U as the result of a nucleophilic attack at the carbon 4 position [41, 42], which might be preceded by an initial nucleophilic attack at the C6.

3. Specific Reactivity of Modified Nucleotides

From a perspective of chemical reactivity, it is helpful to distinguish between modifications carrying principally new chemical moieties, and those which only moderately alter the reactivity of chemical moieties already present in RNA. The latter category essentially contains all methyl group additions, and reagents and reaction conditions must be carefully controlled to achieve discrimination. Thus, the detection of m3C, which has already been mentioned (see Figure 2(a)), is based on the susceptibility of cytidines towards nucleophiles, which was increased by the methyl group modification to N3, and thus allowed for detection after hydrazine treatment. In contrast, addition to the 5 position of a methy lgroup renders cytidines more electron rich and consequently less electrophilic. Therefore, nucleophilic attacks by bisulfite can be restricted to cytidines under carefully controlled conditions which leave m5C unaffected by bisulfite.

A number of more sophisticated modifications involve the introduction of chemical moieties which are chemically orthogonal, that is, they can be conjugated by certain reagents to which unmodified RNA is completely inert. Thus, isothiocyanate and NHS-derivatives selectively react with primary amines as present, for example, in acp3U, or lysidine (k2C). Thiolated nucleotides such as s2U, s4U, and s2C [43, 44] react with iodoacetamide derivatives, and carboxylic acids such as in t6A/m6t6A and acp3U [45, 46], other COOH-containing nucleotides can most probably be activated by carbodiimides for conjugation with a nitrogen nucleophile.

3.1. 5-Methylcytosine

The chemistry of m5C in DNA has been subject to intense research as a consequence of the importance of m5C in the field of epigenetics. Bisulfite m5C sequencing is a state-of-the art detection method and used on a very large scale. The addition of bisulfite to the 6 position promotes a series of chemical transformations depicted in Figure 2(b), which ultimately leads to deamination. Cytidines are thus transformed into uridines and read as such in subsequent sequencing reactions. Based on their resistance to deamination reaction, sequencing after bisulfite treatment will reveal m5C residues as cytidine signals. Despite lasting efforts, adaptation of bisulfite to RNA has only recently succeeded [3537] and is now one of the few methods that might be used to investigate RNA modification on a genome-wide scale [47, 48].

As indicated in Figure 2(c), another avenue of chemical discrimination between cytidines and m5C may involve oxidation of the double bond. Although the oxidation with permanganate produces insoluble MnO2, and further oxidation of the glycol to bis-aldehyde may occur under certain conditions, it has been successfully employed in the discrimination of deoxy-m5C versus deoxycytidine [49, 50]. The osmium tetroxide reactions do not involve the formation of insoluble products, but the reagent is highly toxic and mutagenic. In the past years, a variety of osmate-based bioconjugate reagents have been developed for the selective detection of m5C in DNA. These reagents exploit the additional electron density brought about by the methyl group for highly selective formation of a stable complex with deoxy-m5C but not with deoxycytidine. However, applications to RNA are still lacking [5153] (reviewed in [26]).

3.2. 3-Methylcytosine

Detection of m3C is based on its increased reactivity towards hydrazine, as discussed above. Figure 2(a) shows the reaction sequence leading to an intermediate susceptible to aniline-induced cleavage via  β-elimination. Cleavage sites can be revealed by sequencing reactions with end-labeled RNA [14].

3.3. 7-Methylguanosine

Guanosine methylated at position 7 (m7G) is frequently present in the variable region of tRNAs. As has been pointed out, its detection can be achieved by aniline-induced cleavage of the RNA chain by β-elimination after additional treatment under alkaline conditions [16] or after its reduction by sodium borohydride (NaBH4, shown in Figure 3). Because solutions of NaBH4 are typically alkaline, and because the reduction product has been described as sensitive to reoxidation in air, the actual species undergoing beta elimination may not be well defined. This reaction was first studied for isolation of defined tRNA fragments [54] and later applied to RNA sequencing using DMS in Maxam and Gilbert type chemistry [14] or RNA structural probing.

3.4. 2′-O-Methylated Riboses

Alkaline hydrolysis of RNA polynucleotide chains proceeds via deprotonation of the ribose 2′-OH to the corresponding alcoholate, and its nucleophilic attack of the nearby 3′-phosphate. The resulting intermediate is unstable and rapidly decomposes into a 2',3'-cyclophosphate leading to phosphodiester bond cleavage (Figure 4(a)). The methylation of ribose 2′-OH prevents alcoholate formation, and thus decreases the reactivity of the 2′-oxygen and consequently prevents phosphodiester bond cleavage almost completely [55, 56]. This resistance to alkaline hydrolysis of the phosphodiester bonds on the 3′-side of 2′-O-methylated nucleotides can be detected by primer extension or by direct analysis of the cleavage profile of end-labeled RNA. The 2′-O-methylated residue appears as a “gap” in the regular ladder of OH- cleavage.

A very sensitive method involving RNase H digestion directed by 2′-O-methyl RNA-DNA chimeras can be used to confirm the presence of a 2′-O-methylated residue. RNase H nonspecifically cleaves the RNA strand of an RNA-DNA hybrid. However, it does not cleave any site where the 2′-O position of an RNA residue is methylated. The digestion of an RNA directed by a complementary 2′-O-methyl RNA-DNA chimeric oligonucleotide consisting of four deoxynucleotides flanked by 2′-O-methyl ribonucleotides is site specific. The use of a 2′-O-methyl RNA-DNA chimera and RNAse H digestion therefore provide a direct assay for determining whether any particular nucleotide in a long RNA molecule carries a 2′-O-methyl group. If the 2′-O position of the targeted residue is methylated, RNAse H cleavage is blocked. If instead the 2′-O position is unmodified, RNAse H should cut the RNA specifically at that site [57].

Another method based on the RNA treatment by sodium periodate followed by β-elimination has been recently used to analyze the methylation status of the 3′-terminal nucleotide of plant miRNAs [58, 59]. The reactions eliminate a 3′ nucleotide containing both 2′- and 3′-OH groups on the ribose (Figure 4(b)), resulting in an RNA product that is one nucleotide shorter than the substrate RNA and that contains a 3′ phosphate group [60]. Therefore, miRNAs that contain a 3′ terminal ribose with both 2′- and 3′-OH groups will migrate faster during electrophoresis between one and two nucleotides after the treatment. Methylated miRNAs whose 3′ terminal ribose contains a 2′-O-methyl group do not participate in the reactions and remain unchanged in mobility. A significant disadvantage of this approach is that it does not distinguish a 2′-O-methyl modification from other potential modifications on the 3′ terminal ribose. In studies by Yu et al., it was possible to assign the identity of the 3′-terminal nucleotide modification thanks to mass spectrometry studies [58].

More recently, an alternative chemical treatment which should allow the distinction between unmethylated and 2′-O-methylated residues has been proposed [61, 62]. Free unconstrained ribose 2′-OH easily reacts with N-methylisatoic anhydride (NMIA, Figure 4(c)), and the resulting adduct can be analyzed by primer extension (selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension, SHAPE). For the moment, the method was only applied to RNA structural analysis. However, comparisons of NMIA modification and primer extension profiles for unmodified transcript and 2′-O-methyl-containing RNA may probably be used as a tool for 2′-O-methylation mapping.

Yet another approach allowing the separation of O-methyl nucleosides from ribose-unsubstituted nucleosides in one chromatographic step has been developed in the early 80s [63]. This methods is based on the capability of boronate to form an anionic complex with the cis-2',3' hydroxyls of unsubstituted ribonucleosides, but not with ribose-substituted nucleosides such as 2′-O-methylnucleosides. Phenyl boronates with hydrophobic side chains of about 1 nm in length have been synthesized and used to coat inert 10 μm beads of polychlorotrifluoroethylene. This matrix complexes easily with compounds containing free vicinal cis-hydroxyls allowing their separation from their O-alkyl or O-acyl derivatives. Boronates also find application in affinity electrophoresis [64], as will be detailed later on.

3.5. Pseudouridine

Pseudouridine (psi, Ψ) is the result of an isomerization reaction during which the C5 and N1 positions of uracil are interconverted. The resulting nucleotide features a glycosidic carbon-carbon bond and an additional amide functionality, which is available for chemical discrimination (Figure 5). Because Ψ retains the base pairing characteristics of uridine, it is invisible in RT profiles and must be chemically modified (Figure 5(a)) for detection by either mass spectroscopy [6567] or by RT [8]. Somewhat surprisingly, chemical modification can be achieved with satisfying selectivity by two classes of electrophiles. Michael acceptors such as acrylonitrile [68] or methylvinylsulfone [69] alkylate the N3 while not reacting with the four major nucleotides (Figure 5(b)). These reagents are, however, known to react also with inosine, m5C, and m5U [69, 70].

Ψ residues can be acylated on both nitrogens by carbodiimides (Figure 5(a)) [71, 72]. The reaction also acylates both the N3 of uridines and the N1 of guanosines, but all residues except for the one on N1 of Ψ can be removed by subsequent alkaline treatment [73, 74]. Indeed, whereas U and G adducts of CMC are readily cleaved by weakly alkaline conditions, cleavage of N3-CMC-Ψ requires 7 M NH4OH at 100°C for 8 min [73]. The remaining bulky CMC residues are then detected by primer extension using reverse transcriptase.

Recent extensive studies on pseudouridine mapping by CMCT treatment and MALDI-TOF MS pointed out that modified nucleotide ms2i6A present in E. coli tRNA also retains a CMCT derivative after acylation [67]. However, the chemical basis for this particular reactivity was not elucidated in detail.

Another approach used to detect Ψ residues depends upon the greater resistance of Ψ and m5U residues to hydrazinolysis compared to U and most other U-derived bases (Figure 5(c)). The reaction with hydrazine leads to pyrimidine ring opening (see Figure 2(a)). Subsequent aniline treatment cleaves the polynucleotide chain leading to the termination of RT [7577]. Ψ residues, being resistant to hydrazinolysis, are not cleaved and do not stop RT.

3.6. Thiolated Nucleotides

Sulfur atoms, even when introduced into RNA as thiocarbonyl functions, are easily oxidized but are also very nucleophilic and thus react with a variety of electrophiles under conditions under which the remainder of RNA residues stays inert. Iodoacetamide derivatives, for example, of fluorescent dyes, are typical reagents to derivatize sulfur residues in proteins, that is, free cysteins. Diluted solutions of these reagents have been shown to selectively conjugate to thiolated nucleotides such as s2U, s4U, and s2C [43, 44] (Figure 6). Thiouridines have also been reported to react with carbodiimides like CMCT [78], and the resulting conjugates can be identified by mass spectroscopy [65, 67].

The thiophilic character of mercury ions has been exploited for affinity electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels copolymerized with (N-acryloylamino)phenyl-4-mercuric chloride (APM-gels, Figure 6). Sulfur-containing RNAs are retarded during migration, and interestingly, the degree of retardation depends on the nature of the thiomodification; s4U is more strongly retarded comparing to s2U [79].

3.7. Modifications Containing Primary Amines

Primary amines, which are not present in unmodified RNA, are relatively strong nucleophiles which can be selectively conjugated to a number of commonplace amino-derivatizing agents containing, for example, N-hydroxysuccinimide and isothiocyanate moieties [78, 80, 81], and probably with pentafluorophenol derivatives, too (Figure 7(a)). For example, labeling with fluorescent dyes has been successfully implemented for E. coli tRNAPhe containing acp3U [78, 81]. Fluoresceinisothiocyanate under mild alkaline conditions was successfully applied for the labeling of E. coli tRNATyr at the queosine position [82]. Free amino functions may also react with dansyl chloride under neutral conditions, as was demonstrated by selective labeling of preQ1-34 in the same E. coli tRNATyr obtained from queosine-deficient strain [83] (Figure 7(a)).

3.8. Modifications Containing free Carboxylic Acid Groups

A number of modifications typically occurring at positions 20, 34, and 37 of tRNAs consist in the incorporation of an amino acid via its amino function, resulting in the presence in the modified RNA of a free carboxy group. This can be selectively activated for conjugation with amine reagents by dilute water-soluble carbodiimide, which will not react with the other nucleobases under these conditions (Figure 7(b)). The principle has been demonstrated with mt6A (m6t6A) and acp3U [45, 46] but may be applicable to a variety of other modifications, potentially including ms2t6A, m6t6A, g6A, hn6A, and ms2hn6A, chm5U, cmo5U, cmnm5s2U, cmnm5Um, cmnm5U, m1acp3Ψ, τm5U, and τm5s2U and possibly others.

3.9. Dihydrouridine

In contrast to all other pyrimidines, the dihydrouridine (D) has a saturated pyrimidine ring due to reduction of the double C=C bond between carbons 5 and 6. This considerably affects the stability of D both in the reduction by NaBH4 [8486] and under alkaline conditions [87]. Initial studies of tRNA nucleosides by NaBH4 treatment revealed that D, ac4C, and s4U are reduced under rather harsh reaction conditions [84], while major nucleosides, as well as Ψ residues, were found to be inert. The product of D reduction by NaBH4 is a ureidopropanol riboside (Figure 8(a)). Further studies demonstrated that the D residue in tRNA can be selectively reduced by NaBH4 under very mild conditions at pH 7.5 in Tris-HCl buffer on ice [86].

Another characteristic of D is its particular sensitivity to alkaline hydrolysis. Hydrolytic ring opening (Figure 8(b)) of dihydrouridine occurs quite rapidly at elevated temperatures and a pH above 8.0–8.5 [88]. This instability may explain the absence of this modification in hyperthermophiles and was also used for detection of D residues in yeast tRNA and characterization of the corresponding tRNA D-syntases [87].

3.10. Inosine

The modified nucleotide inosine (I) is derived from adenosine (A) by enzymatic deamination catalyzed by specific adenosine deaminases [89, 90]. RNase T1 does not distinguish inosine residues present in RNA from guanosine residues and cleaves on their 3′ side. However, preliminary specific reaction with glyoxal allows RNase T1 to distinguish G and I residues [91] (Figure 9(a)). Indeed, glyoxal reacts with N1 and N2 of G residues and thus abolishes their recognition by RNase T1. The resulting covalent adduct is stabilized by boric acid. By contrast, inosine cannot react in the same way with glyoxal due to the absence of NH2-group at position 2 and the glyoxal-inosine adduct is unstable. Thus, RNase T1 cleavage of glyoxal-treated RNA proceeds only at inosine residues and not at G residues. The cleavage positions may be detected by primer extension analysis or other methods.

3.11. Queosine

The complicated hypermodification queuosine contains two vicinal hydroxyl groups, a feature otherwise only present in the most 3′-ribose of an RNA chain. A chelating effect of these hydroxyl groups can be exploited by complexation to Lewis acids such as boronic acid. Igloi and Kössel [64] have exploited this feature to develop affinity electrophoresis based on the incorporation of (N-acryloylamino)phenyl-3-boronic acid (APB) into polyacrylamide gels (Figure 9(b)). Affinity chromatography based on the same principle has been described by Vogeli et al. [92]. Of note, vicinal hydroxyl groups can be selectively oxidatized to yield dialdehydes which can be selectively condensed with hydrazine derivatives, yielding hydrazones that can be further stabilized by reduction with borohydrides.

3.12. Wybutosine

The reaction of the wybutosine base (yW) in yeast tRNAPhe with NaBH4 has already been mentioned. Its depurination under mild HCl treatment (pH 2.9, 37°C, 2-3 hours, Figure 10) was already noticed in the late 60s and 70s [17, 93]. Later on, the reaction of the riboaldehyde group formed at the resulting abasic site with hydrazine and hydrazine derivatives was used for specific fluorescence labeling of tRNAPhe for biophysical studies of the ribosomal translation [86, 94].

4. Practical Use of Specific Reagents for Detection of Modified Nucleotides by RT or RNA Chain Cleavage

Specific chemicals like those described above may be used both for detection and the precise localization of modified residues in RNAs. The techniques developed for RNA sequencing using Maxam and Gilbert’s approach also allow for detection of modified nucleotides, since many chemical reactions that are specific for modified nucleotides may be exploited to induce cleavage of RNA polynucleotide chain, often in combination with further chemical treatment. This is the case, for instance, for hydrazine cleavage, NaBH4 reduction, or hydrolysis of phosphodiester bonds under various conditions. Analysis of the cleavage position can be performed with 5′-32P-labeled RNA and separation of the cleaved fragments by electrophoresis on denaturing PAGE. However, these techniques require difficult and time-consuming purification to homogeneity of a sufficient amount (at least 0.5–1 μg) of a given RNA species and thus cannot be applied to low-abundance cellular RNAs.

An alternative approach for the detection of RNA modifications is based on the use of RT. A synthetic DNA oligonucleotide designed to target a specific sequence is annealed to cellular RNA without previous RNA purification. Primer elongation by reverse transcriptase allows both sequencing of RNA species by Sanger type reactions and, in addition, the detection of specific reagent-dependent stops, which are indicative of the presence and exact position of modified nucleotides. A limited number of natural RNA modifications altering Watson-Crick base pairing can be detected by this approach even in the absence of a preceding chemical treatment. For RT-silent modifications, a specific reagent is required to create a bulky chemical modification, which blocks base pairing and consequently progression of the reverse transcriptase, thus resulting in an RT stop. Alternatively, cleavages of the RNA chain generated by specific treatment may also be detected by primer extension. However, interpretation of RT profiles should be undertaken with caution, since the presence of stops or gaps in the RT profile is frequently hidden by natural pauses of the RT at the corresponding positions.

For some RNA modifications, a simple primer extension under specific conditions may also be used for detection. Such method was developed for the precise mapping of 2′-O-methylated residues in RNA and uses primer extension by reverse transcriptase at low dNTP concentrations [55, 56]. It is based on the observation that limited dNTP concentrations cause the reverse transcriptase to frequently slow down (or pause) at such nucleotides. Primer extension with normal (unmodified) residues is much less sensitive to reduced dNTP concentration. Many other modified nucleotides in RNA do not create such pauses, and thus low dNTP concentration-dependent stops seem to be rather specific to 2′-O-methylation. The comparison of RT profile for natural (modified) RNA and unmodified RNA transcript may help to discriminate modification-dependent from other RT stops. It is noteworthy that pauses observed at 2′-O-methylated residues are sequence dependent and, depending on the sequence context, no pause may occur at some of the 2′-O-methylated residues. Therefore, the method does not allow an exhaustive identification of all 2′-O-methylated residues in RNA molecules. In some instances, RNA sequence changes resulting from RNA editing (e.g., adenosine or cytidine deamination) can also be directly detected by comparison of RT profile for unmodified transcript and natural RNA species.

Other methods employing RT are based on particular base pairing properties of some modified nucleotides. An alternative approach for inosine detection consists in direct RNA sequencing with RT and comparison of the cDNA sequence obtained with the corresponding genomic sequence. Due to the absence of amino group at position 6, I base pairs with C residues instead of U residues, thus change the sequence of the cDNA synthesized by RT. Thus, one can detect unexpected A → G changes in the cDNA compared to the genomic sequence [95]. To confirm the data, it is also possible to compare the cDNA sequence obtained by direct sequencing of an unmodified transcript produced by in vitro transcription with the cDNA sequence obtained with the authentic RNA. Another recently developed method that is suitable for transcriptome-wide analysis of inosine is based on specific cyanoethylation of inosine [70].

5. Conclusion

Despite extensive development of specific chemical reagents during several decades (starting in the 1970s), the spectrum of available chemicals capable of selective reaction with modified ribonucleotides remains rather limited. This is related to a limited difference of chemical reactivity between modified nucleotides and their unmodified counterparts. Furthermore, the low stability of RNA molecules during required reaction conditions presents a stringent limitation. Due to these limitations, development of specific reaction schemes was possible only for a small subset of the known modified residues in RNA. Future development in the field should fill these gaps and propose new chemical reagents for extensive analysis of RNA modification by RT and by MS techniques.


APM:(N-acryloylamino)phenyl-4-mercuric chloride
APB:(N-acryloylamino)phenyl -3-boronic acid
RT:Reverse transcription
TLC:Thin layer chromatography
CMCT:1-cyclohexyl-3-(2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl)carbodiimide tosylate
DEPC:Diethyl pyrocarbonate


  1. H. Grosjean and R. Benne, Eds., Modification and Editing of RNA, ASM Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
  2. H. Grosjean, Ed., Fine-Tuning of RNA Functions by Modification and Editing, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005.
  3. H. Grosjean, Ed., DNA and RNA Modification Enzymes: Structure, Mechanism, Function and Evolution, Landes Bioscience, 2009.
  4. S. Douthwaite and F. Kirpekar, “Identifying modifications in RNA by MALDI mass spectrometry,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 425, pp. 1–20, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. T. S. Rozhdestvensky, P. F. Crain, and J. Brosius, “Isolation and posttranscriptional modification analysis of native BC1 RNA from mouse brain,” RNA Biology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  6. H. Oberacher, “Frontiers of mass spectrometry in nucleic acids analysis,” European Journal of Mass Spectrometry, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 351–365, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Kellner, J. Burhenne, and M. Helm, “Detection of RNA modifications,” RNA Biology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 237–247, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Y. Motorin, S. Muller, I. Behm-Ansmant, and C. Branlant, “Identification of modified residues in RNAs by reverse transcription-based methods,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 425, pp. 21–53, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Silberklang, A. M. Gillum, and U. L. RajBhandary, “Use of in vitro 32P labeling in the sequence analysis of nonradioactive tRNAs,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 59, pp. 58–109, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  10. H. Grosjean, G. Keith, and L. Droogmans, “Detection and quantification of modified nucleotides in RNA using thin-layer chromatography,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 265, pp. 357–391, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  11. Z. Meng and P. A. Limbach, “Mass spectrometry of RNA: linking the genome to the proteome,” Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 87–95, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Q. Dai, R. Fong, M. Saikia et al., “Identification of recognition residues for ligation-based detection and quantitation of pseudouridine and N-methyladenosine,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 35, no. 18, pp. 6322–6329, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. M. Maxam and W. Gilbert, “A new method for sequencing DNA,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 560–564, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  14. D. A. Peattie, “Direct chemical method for sequencing RNA,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 1760–1764, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  15. D. A. Peattie and W. Gilbert, “Chemical probes for higher-order structure in RNA,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 4679–4682, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  16. W. Wintermeyer and H. G. Zachau, “A specific chemical chain scission of tRNA at 7-methylguanosine,” FEBS Letters, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 160–164, 1970. View at: Google Scholar
  17. R. Thiebe and H. G. Zachau, “A specific modification next to the anticodon of phenylalanine transfer ribonucleic acid,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 546–555, 1968. View at: Google Scholar
  18. B. Singer, “All oxygens in nucleic acids react with carcinogenic ethylating agents,” Nature, vol. 264, no. 5584, pp. 333–339, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  19. S. A. Mortimer, J. S. Johnson, and K. M. Weeks, “Quantitative analysis of RNA solvent accessibility by N-silylation of guanosine,” Biochemistry, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 2109–2114, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. W. J. Krzyzosiak, J. Biernat, J. Ciesiołka, K. Gulewicz, and M. Wiewiórowski, “The reaction of adenine and cytosine residues in tRNA with chloroacetaldehyde,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 2841–2851, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  21. J. Biernat, J. Ciesiolka, and P. Gornicki, “New observations concerning the chloroacetaldehyde reaction with some tRNA constituents. Stable intermediates, kinetics and selectivity of the reaction,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 789–804, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  22. P. Roques, F. Thome, and M. Olomucki, “Reaction of nucleic acid bases with α-acetylenic esters. Part IV. Preparation of an alkylating derivative of tRNA(Phe) by conformation-specific chemical modification,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 951, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  23. K. Nakaya, O. Takenaka, H. Horinishi, and K. Shibata, “Reactions of glyoxal with nucleic acids, nucleotides and their component bases,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 1968. View at: Google Scholar
  24. H. F. Noller and J. B. Chaires, “Functional modification of 16S ribosomal RNA by kethoxal,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 3113–3118, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  25. T. Pieler, A. Schreiber, and V. A. Erdmann, “Comparative structural analysis of eubacterial 5S rRNA by oxidation of adenines in the N-1 position,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 3115–3126, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  26. A. Okamoto, “Chemical approach toward efficient DNA methylation analysis,” Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. I. Shcherbakova, S. Mitra, R. H. Beer, and M. Brenowitz, “Fast Fenton footprinting: a laboratory-based method for the time-resolved analysis of DNA, RNA and proteins,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 34, no. 6, article no. e48, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. G. J. Murakawa, C. H. B. Chen, M. D. Kuwabara, D. P. Nierlich, and D. S. Sigman, “Scission of RNA by the chemical nuclease of 1,10-phenanthroline-copper ion: preference for single-stranded loops,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 17, no. 13, pp. 5361–5375, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  29. Y. H. Wang, S. R. Sczekan, and E. C. Theil, “Structure of the 5' untranslated regulatory region of ferritin mRNA studied in solution,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 18, no. 15, pp. 4463–4468, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  30. M. Götte, R. Marquet, C. Isel et al., “Probing the higher order structure of RNA with peroxonitrous acid,” FEBS Letters, vol. 390, no. 2, pp. 226–228, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Y. Kuchino, F. Mori, and H. Kasai, “Misreading of DNA templates containing 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine at the modified base and at adjacent residues,” Nature, vol. 326, no. 6117, pp. 77–79, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  32. D. Rhodes, “Accessible and inaccessible bases in yeast phenylalanine transfer RNA as studied by chemical modification,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 449–460, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
  33. K. Negishi, F. Harada, S. Nishimura, and H. Hayatsu, “A rapid cytosine-specific modification of E. coli tRNA (Leu) by semicarbazide-bisulfite, a probe for polynucleotide conformations,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 2283–2292, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  34. M. Münzel, L. Lercher, M. Müller, and T. Carell, “Chemical discrimination between dC and 5MedC via their hydroxylamine adducts,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, no. 21, article e192, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. J. Clark, J. Harrison, C. L. Paul, and M. Frommer, “High sensitivity mapping of methylated cytosines,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 22, no. 15, pp. 2990–2997, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  36. W. Gu, R. L. Hurto, A. K. Hopper, E. J. Grayhack, and E. M. Phizicky, “Depletion of Saccharomyces cerevisiae  tRNAHis guanylyltransferase Thg1p leads to uncharged tRNAHis with additional m5C,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 25, no. 18, pp. 8191–8201, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. Schaefer, T. Pollex, K. Hanna, and F. Lyko, “RNA cytosine methylation analysis by bisulfite sequencing,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 37, no. 2, article no. e12, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. I. L. Batey and D. M. Brown, “Chemical studies of the tertiary structure of transfer RNA. Iodination of exposed cytosine residues with I,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 474, no. 3, pp. 378–385, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  39. J. L. Duh, R. R. Punzalan, and R. C. Pless, “Reactivity of pyrimidine nucleosides under the conditions of the pyrimidine sequencing reactions of Maxam and Gilbert,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 231–238, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  40. H. Hayatsu, “Reaction of cytidine with semicarbazide in the presence of bisulfite. A rapid modification specific for single-stranded polynucleotide,” Biochemistry, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 2677–2682, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  41. K. Miura, T. Iwano, S. Tsuda, T. Ueda, F. Harada, and N. Kato, “Chemical modification of cytosine residues of tRNAVa1 with hydrogen sulfide (nucleosides and nucleotides. XL),” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 4126–4133, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  42. N. Riehl, P. Carbon, B. Ehresmann, and J. P. Ebel, “Chemical conversion of cytidine residues into 4-thiouridines in yeast tRNAPhe. Determination of the modified cytidines,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 4445–4453, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  43. A. E. Johnson, H. J. Adkins, E. A. Matthews, and C. R. Cantor, “Distance moved by transfer RNA during translocation from the A site to the P site on the ribosome,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 113–140, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  44. B. S. Watson, T. L. Hazlett, J. F. Eccleston, C. Davis, D. M. Jameson, and A. E. Johnson, “Macromolecular arrangement in the aminoacyl-tRNA·elongation factor Tu·GTP ternary complex. A fluorescence energy transfer study,” Biochemistry, vol. 34, no. 24, pp. 7904–7912, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. P. Górnicki, M. Judek, A. Wolański, and W. J. Krzyzosiak, “Hypermodified nucleoside carboxyl group as a target site for specific tRNA modification,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 155, no. 2, pp. 371–375, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  46. J. Podkowinski, T. Dymarek-Babs, and P. Gornicki, “Modified tRNAs for probing tRNA binding sites on the ribosome,” Acta Biochimica Polonica, vol. 36, no. 3-4, pp. 235–244, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  47. M. Schaefer, S. Hagemann, K. Hanna, and F. Lyko, “Azacytidine inhibits RNA methylation at DNMT2 target sites in human cancer cell lines,” Cancer Research, vol. 69, no. 20, pp. 8127–8132, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. Y. Motorin, F. Lyko, and M. Helm, “5-methylcytosine in RNA: detection, enzymatic formation and biological functions,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, no. 5, Article ID gkp1117, pp. 1415–1430, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. E. Fritzsche, H. Hayatsu, G. L. Igloi, S. Iida, and H. Kössel, “The use of permanganate as a sequencing reagent for identification of 5-methylcytosine residues in DNA,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 15, no. 14, pp. 5517–5528, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  50. C. T. Bui, K. Rees, and R. G. H. Cotton, “Permanganate oxidation reactions of DNA: perspective in biological studies,” Nucleosides, Nucleotides and Nucleic Acids, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1835–1855, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. K. Tanaka, K. Tainaka, T. Kamei, and A. Okamoto, “Direct labeling of 5-methylcytosine and its applications,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 129, no. 17, pp. 5612–5620, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. K. Tanaka, K. Tainaka, and A. Okamoto, “Methylcytosine-selective fluorescence quenching by osmium complexation,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1615–1621, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. K. Tanaka, K. Tainaka, T. Umemoto, A. Nomura, and A. Okamoto, “An osmium-DNA interstrand complex: application to facile DNA methylation analysis,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 129, no. 46, pp. 14511–14517, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. W. Wintermeyer and H. G. Zachau, “Tertiary structure interactions of 7 methylguanosine in yeast tRNA(Phe) as studied by borohydride reduction,” FEBS Letters, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 306–309, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. B. E. H. Maden, M. E. Corbett, P. A. Heeney, K. Pugh, and P. M. Ajuh, “Classical and novel approaches to the defection and localization of the numerous modified nucleotides in eukaryotic ribosomal RNA,” Biochimie, vol. 77, no. 1-2, pp. 22–29, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. B. E. H. Maden, “Mapping 2'-O-methyl groups in ribosomal RNA,” Methods, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 374–382, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. Y. T. Yu, M. D. Shu, and J. A. Steitz, “A new method for detecting sites of 2'-O-methylation in RNA molecules,” RNA, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 324–331, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  58. B. Yu, Z. Yang, J. Li et al., “Methylation as a crucial step in plant microRNA biogenesis,” Science, vol. 307, no. 5711, pp. 932–935, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. B. Yu, E. J. Chapman, Z. Yang, J. C. Carrington, and X. Chen, “Transgenically expressed viral RNA silencing suppressors interfere with microRNA methylation in Arabidopsis,” FEBS Letters, vol. 580, no. 13, pp. 3117–3120, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. S. Alefelder, B. K. Patel, and F. Eckstein, “Incorporation of terminal phosphorothioates into oligonucleotides,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 26, no. 21, pp. 4983–4988, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. E. J. Merino, K. A. Wilkinson, J. L. Coughlan, and K. M. Weeks, “RNA structure analysis at single nucleotide resolution by Selective 2'-Hydroxyl Acylation and Primer Extension (SHAPE),” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 12, pp. 4223–4231, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. K. A. Wilkinson, E. J. Merino, and K. M. Weeks, “Selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE): quantitative RNA structure analysis at single nucleotide resolution,” Nature Protocols, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1610–1616, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. R. P. Singhal, R. K. Bajaj, and C. M. Buess, “Reversed-phase boronate chromatography for the separation of O-methylribose nucleosides and aminoacyl-tRNAs,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  64. G. L. Igloi and H. Kössel, “Affinity electrophoresis for monitoring terminal phosphorylation and the presence of queuosine in RNA. Application of polyacrylamide containing a covalently bound boronic acid,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 13, no. 19, pp. 6881–6898, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  65. A. Durairaj and P. A. Limbach, “Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry screening for pseudouridine in mixtures of small RNAs by chemical derivatization, RNase digestion and signature products,” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, vol. 22, no. 23, pp. 3727–3734, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. A. Durairaj and P. A. Limbach, “Mass spectrometry of the fifth nucleoside: a review of the identification of pseudouridine in nucleic acids,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 623, no. 2, pp. 117–125, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. A. Durairaj and P. A. Limbach, “Improving CMC-derivatization of pseudouridine in RNA for mass spectrometric detection,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 612, no. 2, pp. 173–181, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. J. Mengel-Jørgensen and F. Kirpekar, “Detection of pseudouridine and other modifications in tRNA by cyanoethylation and MALDI mass spectrometry,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 30, no. 23, article e135, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  69. G. Emmerechts, P. Herdewijn, and J. Rozenski, “Pseudouridine detection improvement by derivatization with methyl vinyl sulfone and capillary HPLC-mass spectrometry,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 825, no. 2, pp. 233–238, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. M. Sakurai, T. Yano, H. Kawabata, H. Ueda, and T. Suzuki, “Inosine cyanoethylation identifies A-to-I RNA editing sites in the human transcriptome,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 733–740, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. T. Mizutani, “Chemical modification of pseudouridylic acid in valine transfer ribonucleic acid I from Torulopsis utilis with a radioactive carbodiimide,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 589–595, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  72. T. Mizutani, “Chemical modification of pseudouridylic acid in isoeleucine transfer ribonucleic acid from Torulopsis utilis with a radioactive carbodiimide,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 567–569, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  73. N. W. Y. Ho and P. T. Gilham, “Reaction of pseudouridine and inosine with N-cyclohexyl-N'-β-(4-methylmorpholinium) ethylcarbodiimide,” Biochemistry, vol. 10, no. 20, pp. 3651–3657, 1971. View at: Google Scholar
  74. K. G. Patteson, L. P. Rodicio, and P. A. Limbach, “Identification of the mass-silent post-transcriptionally modified nucleoside pseudouridine in RNA by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry,” Nucleic acids research, vol. 29, no. 10, p. E49, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  75. A. Bakin and J. Ofengand, “Four newly located pseudouridylate residues in Escherichia coli 23S ribosomal RNA are all at the peptidyltransferase center: analysis by the application of a new sequencing technique,” Biochemistry, vol. 32, no. 37, pp. 9754–9762, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  76. A. Bakin and J. Ofengand, “Mapping of pseudouridine residues in RNA to nucleotide resolution,” in Protein Synthesis: Methods and Protocols, R. Martin, Ed., vol. 77, pp. 297–309, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  77. S. Massenet, Y. Motorin, D. L. J. Lafontaine, E. C. Hurt, H. Grosjean, and C. Branlant, “Pseudouridine mapping in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae spliceosomal U small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) reveals that pseudouridine synthase Pus1p exhibits a dual substrate specificity for U2 snRNA and tRNA,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 2142–2154, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  78. M. Caron and H. Dugas, “Specific spin labeling of transfer ribonucleic acid molecules,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 19–34, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  79. G. L. Igloi, “Interaction of tRNAs and of phosphorothioate-substituted nucleic acids with an organomercurial. Probing the chemical environment of thiolated residues by affinity electrophoresis,” Biochemistry, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 3842–3849, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  80. S. Friedman, H. J. Li, K. Nakanishi, and G. Van Lear, “3-(3-Amino-3-carboxy-n-propyl)uridine. the structure of the nucleoside in Escherichia coli transfer ribonucleic acid that reacts with phenoxyacetoxysuccinimide,” Biochemistry, vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 2932–2937, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  81. J. A. Plumbridge, H. G. Baumert, M. Ehrenberg, and R. Rigler, “Characterisation of a new, fully active fluorescent derivative of E. coli tRNA Phe,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 827–843, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  82. A. Pingoud, R. Kownatzki, and G. Maass, “Fluoresceinylthiocarbamyl tRNA(Tyr): a useful derivative of tRNA(Tyr) (E. coli) for physicochemical studies,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 327–338, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  83. H. Kasai, N. Shindo-Okada, S. Noguchi, and S. Nishimura, “Specific fluorescent labelling of 7-(aminomethyl)-7-deazaguanosine located in the anticodon of tRNA(Tyr) isolated from E. coli mutant,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 231–238, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  84. P. Cerutti and N. Miller, “Selective reduction of yeast transfer ribonucleic acid with sodium borohydride,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 55–66, 1967. View at: Google Scholar
  85. T. Igo-Kemenes and H. G. Zachau, “On the specificity of the reduction of transfer ribonucleic acids with sodium borohydride,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 549–556, 1969. View at: Google Scholar
  86. W. Wintermeyer, H. G. Schleich, and H. G. Zachau, “Incorporation of amines or hydrazines into tRNA replacing wybutine or dihydrouracil,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 59, pp. 110–121, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  87. F. Xing, S. L. Hiley, T. R. Hughes, and E. M. Phizicky, “The specificities of four yeast dihydrouridine synthases for cytoplasmic tRNAs,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 17, pp. 17850–17860, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. C. H. House and S. L. Miller, “Hydrolysis of dihydrouridine and related compounds,” Biochemistry, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 315–320, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. B. L. Bass, “An I for editing,” Current Biology, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 598–600, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  90. S. Maas, A. Rich, and K. Nishikura, “A-to-I RNA editing: recent news and residual mysteries,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 3, pp. 1391–1394, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. D. P. Morse and B. L. Bass, “Detection of inosine in messenger RNA by inosine-specific cleavage,” Biochemistry, vol. 36, no. 28, pp. 8429–8434, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. G. Vogeli, T. S. Stewart, T. McCutchan, and D. Soll, “Isolation of Escherichia coli precursor tRNAs containing modified nucleoside Q,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 252, no. 7, pp. 2311–2318, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  93. J. E. Ladner and M. P. Schweizer, “Effects of dilute HCl on yeast tRNAPhe and E. coli tRNA1fMet,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 183–192, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  94. H. G. Schleich, W. Wintermeyer, and H. G. Zachau, “Replacement of wybutine by hydrazines and its effect on the active conformation of yeast tRNA(Phe),” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1701–1713, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  95. L. Saccomanno and B. L. Bass, “A minor fraction of basic fibroblast growth factor mRNA is deaminated in Xenopus stage VI and matured oocytes,” RNA, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 39–48, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Isabelle Behm-Ansmant et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.