Table of Contents
Journal of Neurodegenerative Diseases
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 429171, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/429171
Research Article

Outcomes of a Peer Support Program in Multiple Sclerosis in an Australian Community Cohort: A Prospective Study

1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 34-54 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
2Department of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia
3School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia

Received 29 August 2013; Accepted 4 November 2013

Academic Editor: Yaroslav Winter

Copyright © 2013 Louisa Ng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. L. Dombovy, “Multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's Disease rehabilitation,” in Principles of Neurological Rehabilitation, R. Lazar, Ed., pp. 173–197, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  2. World Health Organization, “International classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF),” Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.
  3. C. Emery, “Women living with chronic illness experienced transition that involved stages of distress and a quest for ordinariness,” Evidence-Based Nursing, vol. 6, article 63, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  4. R. L. Leavy, “Social support and psychological disorder: a review,” Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 3–21, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. E. Rootes and D. L. Aanes, “A conceptual framework for understanding self-help groups,” Hospital and Community Psychiatry, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 379–381, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C.-L. Dennis, “Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis,” International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 321–332, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Lorig, M. Seleznick, D. Lubeck, E. Ung, R. L. Chastain, and H. R. Holman, “The beneficial outcomes of the Arthritis Self-Management Course are not adequately explained by behavior change,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 91–95, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. M. Hoey, S. C. Ieropoli, V. M. White, and M. Jefford, “Systematic review of peer-support programs for people with cancer,” Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 315–337, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. I. Ljungberg, T. Kroll, A. Libin, and S. Gordon, “Using peer mentoring for people with spinal cord injury to enhance self-efficacy beliefs and prevent medical complications,” Journal of Clinical Nursing, vol. 20, no. 3-4, pp. 351–358, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. M. Uccelli, L. M. Mohr, M. A. Battaglia, P. Zagami, and D. C. Mohr, “Peer support groups in multiple sclerosis: current effectiveness and future directions,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 80–84, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. F. Khan, B. Amatya, I. Rajapaksa, and L. Ng, “Outcomes of social support programs in brain cancer survivors in an Australian community cohort: a prospective study,” Journal of Cancer Research and Therapy, vol. 1, pp. 24–33, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  12. L. Ng, P. Talman, and F. Khan, “Neuropsychological sequelae in motor neurone disease: outcomes of a peer support program,” International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, vol. 18, pp. 266–273, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  13. W. I. McDonald, A. Compston, G. Edan et al., “Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 121–127, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. F. Khan, J. F. Pallant, C. Brand, and T. J. Kilpatrick, “Effectiveness of rehabilitation intervention in persons with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 1230–1235, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. F. Lovibond and S. H. Lovibond, “The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories,” Behaviour Research and Therapy, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 335–343, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. R. Cohen, B. M. Mount, M. G. Strobel, and F. Bui, “The McGill quality of life questionnaire: ameasure of quality of life appropriate for people with advanced disease. A preliminary study of validity and acceptability,” Palliative Medicine, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 207–219, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. S. Carver, “You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE,” International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 92–100, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis For the Behavioural Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1988.
  19. S. Power and J. Hegarty, “Facilitated peer support in breast cancer: a pre- and post-program evaluation of women's expectations and experiences of a facilitated peer support program,” Cancer Nursing, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. E9–E16, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L. Locock and J. B. Brown, “‘All in the same boat’? Patient and carer attitudes to peer support and social comparison in motor neurone disease (MND),” Social Science and Medicine, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 1498–1505, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F. Khan, L. Turner-Stokes, L. Ng, and T. Kilpatrick, “Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 2, Article ID CD006036, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus