Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2009 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2009 |Article ID 526128 |

Prasantha R. Mudimela, Larisa I. Nasibulina, Albert G. Nasibulin, Andrzej Cwirzen, Markus Valkeapää, Karin Habermehl-Cwirzen, Jari E. M. Malm, Maarit J. Karppinen, Vesa Penttala, Tatiana S. Koltsova, Oleg V. Tolochko, Esko I. Kauppinen, "Synthesis of Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers on Silica and Cement Matrix Materials", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2009, Article ID 526128, 4 pages, 2009.

Synthesis of Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers on Silica and Cement Matrix Materials

Academic Editor: Alan K. T. Lau
Received20 Jul 2009
Accepted04 Dec 2009
Published15 Feb 2010


In order to create strong composite materials, a good dispersion of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and nanofibers (CNFs) in a matrix material must be obtained. We proposed a simple method of growing the desirable carbon nanomaterial directly on the surface of matrix particles. CNTs and CNFs were synthesised on the surface of model object, silica fume particles impregnated by iron salt, and directly on pristine cement particles, naturally containing iron oxide. Acetylene was successfully utilised as a carbon source in the temperature range from 550 to . 5–10 walled CNTs with diameters of 10–15 nm at and 12–20 nm at were synthesised on silica particles. In case of cement particles, mainly CNFs with a diameter of around 30 nm were grown. It was shown that high temperatures caused chemical and physical transformation of cement particles.

Carbonnanotubes (CNTs) and nanofibers (CNFs) have recently achieved significant scientific attention owing to their extraordinary and useful properties, such as exceptional tensile strength, elastic modulus and electrical and thermal conductivity [1, 2]. Therefore, small additives of CNTs and CNFs to different materials can considerably improve their mechanical and electrical properties [35]. CNT/CNF reinforced cement composites are able to provide electromagnetic interference shielding [6] and also these composites capable of nondestructive flaw detection [7]. Utilization of CNTs/CNFs has been already occasionally investigated for applications in construction industry [8, 9] although the expected improvement has not been achieved, yet [1012]. The biggest problem in the potential use of the carbon nanomaterials for making strong concrete arises when CNTs or CNFs are being introduced in the matrix material. Due to their high agglomeration/bundling addiction, the carbon nanomaterials cannot be easily and homogenously dispersed in a cement matrix by simple mixing procedure [12]. Usually multistep time consuming processes are required. Bulk amount of CNT/CNFs needs to be purified, functionalized, and only afterwards mixed with matrices. However, even this procedure does not lead to significant enhancement of the concrete mechanical properties due to poor bonding between the CNT/CNF and cement [12].

In this letter, we report a simple method to solve the problem of creating a good dispersion of CNTs and CNFs in a matrix. A desirable carbon nanomaterial can be simply grown on the surface of matrix particles. This also provides good bonding between the carbon nanomaterials and matrix. As a matrix material, we selected silica fume and cement particles. Silica particles with the size from 100 nm to 2  m were chosen as a model object for the comparative growth of CNTs/CNFs. In addition, silica is known to be used in construction industry to increase the strengths of concrete as a microfiller and a reactant in pozzolanic reaction during cement hydration [13]. Moreover, silica particles covered by CNTs/CNFs can be used to uniformly introduce the carbon nanostructures into concrete. As for another matrix, we selected cement, one of the most important construction materials. Cement consists of around 1–20  m sized particles with broad size distribution and, importantly, naturally contains iron oxide. Thereby, it could be directly used as a catalyst and a support for the carbon nanomaterial synthesis. For this study, sulphate-resistant Portland type cement (CEM I 42.5 N) with 3.4 % (weight) Fe2O3 produced by Finnsementti Oy was used. Some of the other main cement components are SiO2, MgO, and Al2O3, which are known to be good supporting materials for the CNT growth [1416].

The growth of CNTs and CNFs was carried out by a conventional CVD method at atmospheric pressure. Acetylene and methane were examined as carbon sources. Cement particles were utilised without any additional pretreatment if not otherwise specified. For SiO2 impregnation by catalyst, 2 g of silica particles were mixed with 150 mL water based iron nitrate (  M) solution. Then, the solution was stirred for 1 hour and dried in an oven at 90°C. In prior to use, the obtained powder was ground. For the CNT/CNF synthesis, either cement or impregnated silica powder were placed in a crucible boat, introduced into the quartz CVD tube (inner diameter of 12 mm) reactor, and heated to the synthesis temperature in an argon atmosphere at the flow rate of 280 cm3/min. In order to reduce iron oxide, a 280 cm3/min flow of hydrogen was introduced in the reactor for 5 minutes. After that, either acetylene or methane with the flow rate of 28 cm3/min were passed through the reactor for 20 minutes. Subsequently, after the synthesis stage, the carbon source and H2 were switched off and the reactor was cooled down to room temperature in the Ar flowing conditions.

Both silica and cement particles were completely covered by carbon nanomaterials when acetylene was used as the carbon source. On the surface of silica particles, mainly CNFs with the diameters varied from 30 to 50 nm were observed at 550°C. Increasing temperature resulted in the growth of multiwalled CNTs with 5 to 10 walls as shown in Figure 1. The outer diameter of multiwalled CNTs varied from 10 to 15 nm at 600°C and from 12 nm to 20 nm at 750°C. The maximum length of the CNTs was found to be 15  m. In case of cement particles, mainly CNFs with the diameter of about 30 nm and average length of 3  m were grown at the same conditions applied for CNT growth on silica particles (Figure 2). The difference between the products synthesized on silica and cement particles gave us ground for a suggestion that the amount of catalyst was not sufficient in the cement particles. In order to examine this hypothesis, we impregnated cement particles with iron salt. For the impregnation, 0.4 g of cement was added to 56 mL ethanol-based iron nitrate (  M) solution. The solution was stirred for 1.5 hours and dried at ambient conditions. However, utilization of the impregnated cement particles slightly increased the yield of CNFs, but did not lead to the formation of CNTs. Most likely formation of different products on silica and cement particles is determined by different interaction of catalyst with substrate particles. Catalyst particles were found at the end of the CNTs, while the CNFs did not contain any catalyst at their tips. This gives us a base for a suggestion of tip mechanism of the CNT growth and root mechanism of the CNF formation. In this case, CNFs are likely attached to the cement substrate via the catalyst, which is apparently a part of the cement particles.

As cement was treated at high temperatures, it might undergo chemical alterations, which could make impossible to use this material for constructive purposes. In order to examine the possible changes, the cement particles were characterized by means of X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) analysis. The XRD data were collected on a Philips PW 1820 diffractometer by using CuKα radiation. No major changes were found in the cement particles up to 700°C, but new peaks corresponding to graphitized carbon appeared in the diffraction pattern (Figure 3). Also, gypsum phase vanished after the treatment at high temperatures. This can be explained by dehydration of gypsum CaSO4 2H2O phase and formation of its anhydrate form [17]. Heat treatment of cement particles at 900°C led to the formation of free lime phase, CaO, likely due to the decomposition of Ca3SiO5 to Ca2SiO4 [18]. Thus, from the XRD data it can be concluded that the conditions of CNF and CNT synthesis did not significantly change the composition of cement particles. Therefore, the produced carbon nanomaterials would be easily homogenously dispersed in the concrete and mortar and could be intermingled with the products during cement hydration process [19].

Gypsum is usually added and mixed with clinker at the final stage of cement production and used mainly as an inhibitor for cement hydration process. For industrial applications, instead of cement, clinker particles should be used. This will firstly make the process of CNT/CNF-cement composite manufacturing cheaper, and secondly it will avoid chemical changes in the cement material. In order to confirm the possibility of using clinker as a catalyst and a support, we have carried out similar investigations with acetylene. We could not find a significant difference in products synthesized on cement and clinker.

It is worth noting that the described procedure for the synthesis of carbon nanomaterials did not allow us to produce CNTs and CNFs on cement particles using CH4 as a carbon source. This can be explained by the need of high temperatures (850–950°C) for CH4 decomposition. At these temperatures cement particles change their crystal structure as was found by XRD investigations (Figure 3). On-line Fourier-Transform Infrared (FT-IR) measurements of the outlet gas phase composition revealed relatively high emission of CO2 and H2O in inert Ar atmosphere during heating of the cement particles. These two gaseous compounds are known to behave as etching agents [20] and could completely suppress the growth of CNTs and CNFs on the surface of cement particles.

In conclusion, CNTs and CNFs were grown on the surface of model object, silica fume particles impregnated by iron salt, and directly on pristine cement particles using acetylene as a carbon source. The produced carbon nanomaterials are homogenously dispersed in the matrix materials, which solves the biggest problem of creating a good dispersion of CNTs and CNFs in a matrix and also provides good bonding between carbon and matrix materials. The experiments were carried out at the temperature range from 550 to 750°C and characterized by means of TEM, SEM, XRD, and FT-IR. It was found that at higher temperatures, cement particles underwent chemical and physical changes. These restrict the utilization of methane as a carbon source for the growth of carbon nanomaterials on the surface of cement particles.


This work was supported by the Academy of Finland (projects number 128445, 124283, and 128495) and by the Federal Agency for Science and Innovation. Prasantha R. Mudimela acknowledges Finnish National Graduate School in Nanoscience (NGS-NANO).


  1. R. Saito, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, Physical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes, Imperial College Press, London, UK, 1998.
  2. X. Zhang, Q. Li, T. G. Holesinger et al., “Ultrastrong, stiff, and lightweight carbon-nanotube fibers,” Advanced Materials, vol. 19, no. 23, pp. 4198–4201, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. E. Riggs, Z. Guo, D. L. Carroll, and Y.-P. Sun, “Strong luminescence of solubilized carbon nanotubes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 122, no. 24, pp. 5879–5880, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. K. P. De Jong and J. W. Geus, “Carbon nanofibers: catalytic synthesis and applications,” Catalysis Reviews: Science and Engineering, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 481–510, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  5. H. D. Wagner, O. Lourie, Y. Feldman, and R. Tenne, “Stress-induced fragmentation of multiwall carbon nanotubes in a polymer matrix,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 188–190, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. X. Fu and D. D. L. Chung, “Submicron carbon filament cement-matrix composites for electromagnetic interference shielding,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1467–1472, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. P.-W. Chen and D. D. L. Chung, “Carbon fiber reinforced concrete for smart structures capable of non-destructive flaw detection,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 22–30, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. G. Y. Li, P. M. Wang, and X. Zhao, “Mechanical behavior and microstructure of cement composites incorporating surface-treated multi-walled carbon nanotubes,” Carbon, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1239–1245, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. D. L. Chung, “Comparison of submicron-diameter carbon filaments and conventional carbon fibers as fillers in composite materials,” Carbon, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1119–1125, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. P. Calvert, “Nanotube composites: a recipe for strength,” Nature, vol. 399, no. 6733, pp. 210–211, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. W. Zhu, P. J. M. Bartos, and A. Porro, “Application of nanotechnology in construction summary of a state-of-the-art report,” Materials and Structures, vol. 37, no. 273, pp. 649–658, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. M. Makar and J. J. Beaudoin, “Carbon nanotubes and their application in the construction industry,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Nanotechnology in Construction, pp. 331–341, Paisley, Scotland, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  13. J. K. Weng, B. W. Langen, and M. A. Ward, “Pozzolanic reaction in Portland cement, silica fume, and fly ash mixtures,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 754–760, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  14. K. Hernadi, A. Fonseca, J. B. Nagy, D. Bernaerts, J. Riga, and A. Lucas, “Catalytic synthesis and purification of carbon nanotubes,” Synthetic Metals, vol. 77, no. 1–3, pp. 31–34, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. Qingwen, Y. Hao, C. Yan, Z. Jin, and L. Zhongfan, “A scalable CVD synthesis of high-purity single-walled carbon nanotubes with porous MgO as support material,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1179–1183, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J.-W. An and D.-S. Lim, “Synthesis and characterization of alumina/carbon nanotube composite powders,” Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 174–177, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  17. S. Sener, S. Bilgen, and G. Özbayoglu, “Effect of heat treatment on grindabilities of celestite and gypsum and separation of heated mixture by differential grinding,” Minerals Engineering, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 473–475, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. V. Sevcik and F. Skvara, “High-temperature properties of a binder based on gypsum-free Portland cement over the temperature range of 20 to 1200C,” Ceramics-Silikáty, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 151–157, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  19. A. G. Nasibulin, S. D. Shandakov, L. I. Nasibulina et al., “A novel cement-based hybrid material,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 11, no. 10, Article ID 023013, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  20. A. G. Nasibulin, D. P. Brown, P. Queipo, D. Gonzalez, H. Jiang, and E. I. Kauppinen, “An essential role of CO2 and H2O during single-walled CNT synthesis from carbon monoxide,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 417, no. 1–3, pp. 179–184, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2009 Prasantha R. Mudimela et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.