Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2010 / Article
Special Issue

1D Nanomaterials

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 382043 |

Norihiro Suzuki, Yusuke Yamauchi, "Fabrication of Mesostructured Silica and Titania Rods on Substrates by Using Polycarbonate Membranes", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2010, Article ID 382043, 4 pages, 2010.

Fabrication of Mesostructured Silica and Titania Rods on Substrates by Using Polycarbonate Membranes

Academic Editor: Yanqiu Zhu
Received30 Nov 2009
Accepted11 Mar 2010
Published30 May 2010


By using the polycarbonate membrane a template, mesoporous silica rods are fabricated on a silicon substrate in one pot. From scanning electron microscope (SEM) images, the creation of fibrous morphology is confirmed over the entire area. The diameter of the obtained rods is consistent with that of the template. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images revealed that the tubular mesochannels are uniaxially oriented parallel to the longitudinal axis of the silica rods. The mesoporous titania rods with anatase crystalline frameworks are also fabricated.

1. Introduction

Mesoporous/mesostructured one-dimensional (1D) materials (such as rods and tubes) are attractive, because they can be utilized as noble optical, electric and magnetic devices. One of the fabrication methods for the 1D material is the template-directed synthesis. In this process, the precursor solution is introduced into the pores of the template. By adding the surfactant into the precursor solution, the self-organization of surfactant micelles occurs, which derives the ordered mesostructures within the template. After removing the template and surfactants, the mesoporous 1D materials can be obtained.

The fabrication of the mesoporous 1D materials on a substrate is important for practical application. Recently, Zhu et al. reported the synthesis of mesostructured silica tubes on a silicon substrate using the porous anodic alumina (PAA) template [1]. In this study, though the fabricated tubes were oriented perpendicularly to the substrate, a strong vacuum condition was required to enter the surfactant/silica source into the pores of the PAA template. Furthermore, because the PAA template was removed by the use of phosphoric acid, this fabrication method is not applicable to compositions with low tolerance for acid.

To overcome it, we focus on the polycarbonate (PC) membrane. The PC membrane has several advantages compared to the PAA [24]. Firstly, since the PC is stable under acidic condition, the side reactions are prevented. In addition, the PC membrane and the surfactants can be removed simultaneously by calcination. In this paper, we demonstrate the one-pot fabrication of mesoporous silica rods on a silicon substrate using the PC template. Without using the strong vacuum condition, the silica rods were successfully fabricated on the substrate. Our facial fabrication procedure was also applied for the fabrication of mesoporous titania rods.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, extra pure reagent) as a silica source was purchased from Nacalai Tesque, Inc. Titanium tetraisopropoxide (as titania source) was obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. Ethanol, dilute hydrochloric acid (pH = 2), and concentrated hydrochloric acid (35.5 w%) were obtained from Nacalai Tesque, Inc. A triblock copolymer P123 was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. Polycarbonate membrane filters with 200 nm diameter pores were purchased from Advantec Co., Ltd.

2.2. Preparation of Precursor Solutions

The mixture of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 5.2 g), ethanol (6 g), and dilute aqueous HCl (pH = 2, 2.7 g) was stirred for 20 minutes. Then triblock copolymer P123 (1.38 g) and ethanol (4 g) were added and the mixture was stirred for 3 hours [5]. In the preparation of the titania precursor solution, we followed the paper by Wu et al. [6]. Concentrated HCl (35.5 w%, 0.74 g) was added into titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP, 1.05 g) and stirred vigorously for 10 minutes. This solution was added drop by drop into an ethanol solution (3 g) of P123 (0.2 g), then stirred for 15 minutes.

2.3. Preparation of Mesoporous Silica and Titania Rods

The fabrication procedure of mesoporous rods is shown schematically in Figure 1. The thin film was prepared by spin-coating at 8000 rpm (Silica) and 4000 rpm (Titania) on a silicon wafer cleaned with ethanol. After the spin-coating, a polycarbonate membrane filter was placed on the film. Because the surface of the spin-coated film was not dried out completely, P123/TEOS and P123/TTIP sources can penetrate into the pores of the PC membrane due to the capillary force. The silica film with the PC membrane was dried in air for 1 day and the titania film was aged at −20°C for 1 day. These as-synthesized films were calcined at 500°C for 8 hours (Silica) or 400°C for 4 hours (Titania) to remove the PC membrane and surfactants simultaneously.

2.4. Characterization

SEM images were recorded with a Hitachi S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope. Before the observation, SEM samples were coated with Pt. TEM images were obtained using a JEOL JEM-2010. During the measurement, the accelerating voltage of the electron beam was set to be 200 kV.

3. Results and Discussion

The SEM image of the silica rods is shown in Figure 2(a). A large number of rods were successfully fabricated over the entire area of the substrate. The estimated diameter of the obtained fiber was about 200 nm, which consisted with the pore size of the PC membranes. These facts indicate that the size of rods can be controlled by changing the pore sizes of the PC membranes. The length of the fabricated fibers ranged between 1  m to 2  m, which was much shorter than the PC membrane thickness (about 10  m). The main reason is that the spin-coated film was so thin that the precursor source cannot fulfill the entire pore space of the PC template. Titania rods were also fabricated as shown in Figure 2(b), revealing that our procedure is applicable beyond silica. The densities of the rods were lower rather than that of the silica tubes/rods prepared by PAA membranes [2, 710], because the number of the pores in the PC membranes is relatively lower (Figure 3). Also, the fabricated rods were randomly placed and inclined to the substrate (Figure 2), because the pores in the PC membranes are randomly dispersed and the pores are not oriented completely perpendicular, but are tilted to the substrate (Figure 3).

Almost the P123/TEOS and P123/TTIP sources could penetrate into the pores of the PC membrane due to the capillary force, because the continuous films regions on the Si substrate were not observed clearly from the cross-sectional SEM images (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)). But, it was revealed that, from a highly magnified SEM image (Figure 4), very thin films (less than 30 nm) with uniform mesopores covered the area of the substrate.

Furthermore, the mesostructures inside the silica rods were investigated directly by taking the TEM images perpendicular to the long axis of the fibers (Figure 5). Tubular mesopores were observed in the rod and these mesochannels were uniaxially oriented parallel to the longitudinal axis of the rod. The pore diameter of mesopores was estimated to be 6.2 nm, which coincided well with the result of N2 gas adsorption-desorption (6.0 nm) [4]. In the SAXS profiles of silica rods, peaks assignable to (10), (11), and (20) peaks of 2D hexagonal symmetries (p6m) were observed (not shown), confirming the mesostructural ordering.

The appearance of the mesopore channels parallel to the longitudinal axis is noteworthy. It has been well known that there are two types of orientations of the mesochannels in a cylindrical confide space. One is “columnar orientation” in which the tubular mesochannels are aligned along the long axis of the cylinders. The other one is “circular orientation” in which the mesochannels are circularly formed inside the cylinders (i.e., stacked-donuts structures) [7]. In the use of porous anodic alumina (PAA) membranes with P123 surfactants, the “circular orientation” is mainly formed inside the cylindrical channels, even though the mesochannels orientation with respect to the long axis of the cylinders can be tuned according to the silica-to-P123 ratio and the salt content in the precursor solution and the relative humidity during the solvent evaporation [79]. On the other hand, in the use of PC membranes with P123 surfactants, the interaction of silica-P123 species with the PC surfaces is weaker than that with the PAA surfaces, and any preferred orientations were not confirmed. In this case, both the “columnar orientation” and the “circular orientation” were observed [4]. In the present system, however, only “columnar orientation” was observed in the rods. When the P123/TEOS source penetrates into the pores of the membrane due to the capillary force (Figure 1), the motion of silica-P123 species in a uniaxial direction to the long axis of the PC channels occurs. At this stage, the tubular mesochannels can be anisotropically arranged along the flow direction (i.e., along the cylinders of the PC membranes), because an interaction between the P123/TEOS sources and the PC surface is weak. At the interface between the silica rod and the Si substrate, it was proved that the mesochannels were oriented parallel to the Si substrate, due to the strong interaction between the silica-P123 species and the Si substrate surface. This phenomenon has been normally observed previously [5].

In the case of the mesoporous titania rods, it is expected that crystallization as well as template removal will occur during the calcination procedure [6]. Disordered mesostructures are observed inside the rods (not shown). In the XRD pattern of titania samples, several diffraction peaks were detected (not shown). These peaks were well matched with the diffraction pattern of anatase titania, revealing that fabricated titania rods have anatase crystalline frameworks. The crystal size of anatase titania was estimated using the Scherrer equation: by using (101) reflection peak, the crystal size was roughly estimated to be around 4.8 nm. Fabrication of mesoporous rods with such crystallized frameworks will be important for a practical application such as catalyst.

4. Conclusion

Mesostructured silica and titania rods on a silicon substrate were successfully produced by using the polycarbonate membranes as templates. Because the polycarbonate template and surfactants were burned out simultaneously, the mesoporous rods were fabricated in one pot, which facilitates the production of the arrays in comparison with the previous work using PAA membranes [1]. In the case of mesoporous titania rods, the crystallization also occurred during calcination procedure. This facial synthesis method can be utilized to fabricate various types of metal oxide rods on a substrate.


  1. W. Zhu, Y. Han, and L. An, “Synthesis of ordered mesostructured silica nanotubal arrays,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 84, no. 1–3, pp. 69–74, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Z. Liang and A. S. Susha, “Mesostructured silica tubes and rods by templating porous membranes,” Chemistry—A European Journal, vol. 10, no. 19, pp. 4910–4914, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. Lai, M. Z. Hu, D. Shi, and D. Blom, “STEM characterization on silica nanowires with new mesopore structures by space-confined self-assembly within nano-scale channels,” Chemical Communications, no. 11, pp. 1338–1340, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Y. Yamauchi, N. Suzuki, and T. Kimura, “Formation of mesoporous oxide fibers in polycarbonate confined spaces,” Chemical Communications, no. 38, pp. 5689–5691, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y. Yamauchi, M. Sawada, M. Komatsu et al., “Magnetically induced orientation of mesochannels in mesoporous silica films at 30 Tesla,” Chemistry—An Asian Journal, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 1505–1512, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C.-W. Wu, T. Ohsuna, M. Kuwabara, and K. Kuroda, “Formation of highly ordered mesoporous titania films consisting of crystalline nanopillars with inverse mesospace by structural transformation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 128, no. 14, pp. 4544–4545, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Y. Wu, G. Cheng, K. Katsov et al., “Composite mesostructures by nano-confinement,” Nature Materials, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 816–822, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. Wang, R. Kou, Z. Yang, J. He, Z. Yang, and Y. Lu, “Hierachical mesoporous silica wires by confined assembly,” Chemical Communications, no. 2, pp. 166–167, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. B. Platschek, N. Petkov, and T. Bein, “Tuning the structure and orientation of hexagonally ordered mesoporous channels in anodic alumina membrane hosts: a 2D small-angle X-ray scattering study,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1134–1138, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. Yamauchi, A. Sugiyama, M. Sawada et al., “Magnetically induced orientation of mesochannels inside porous anodic alumina membranes under ultra high magnetic field of 30 T: confirmation by TEM,” Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan, vol. 116, no. 1359, pp. 1244–1248, 2008. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2010 Norihiro Suzuki and Yusuke Yamauchi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.