Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2010 / Article
Special Issue

Polymer Nanocomposite Processing, Characterization, and Applications

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 906936 |

Xuemeng Dong, Chenguang Liu, "Preparation and Characterization of Self-Assembled Nanoparticles of Hyaluronic Acid-Deoxycholic Acid Conjugates", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2010, Article ID 906936, 9 pages, 2010.

Preparation and Characterization of Self-Assembled Nanoparticles of Hyaluronic Acid-Deoxycholic Acid Conjugates

Academic Editor: Gaurav Mago
Received14 Oct 2009
Accepted31 Mar 2010
Published14 Jun 2010


Novel amphiphilic biopolymers were synthesized using hyaluronic acid (HA) as a hydrophilic segment and deoxycholic acid (DOCA) as a hydrophobic segment by a 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide mediated coupling reaction. The structural characteristics of the HA-DOCA conjugates were investigated using NMR. Self-assembled nanoparticles were prepared based on HA-DOCA conjugates, and its characteristics were investigated using dynamic laser light scattering, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and fluorescence spectroscopy. The mean diameter was about 293.5 nm with unimodal size distribution in distilled water. The TEM images revealed that the shape of HA-DOCA self-aggregates was spherical. The critical aggregation concentration (CAC) was in the range of 0.025–0.056 mg/mL. The partition equilibrium constant () of pyrene in self-aggregates solution was from to . The aggregation number of DOCA groups per hydrophobic microdomain, estimated by the fluorescence quenching method using cetylpyridinium chloride, increased with increasing degree of substitution.

1. Introduction

Polymeric amphiphiles derived from hydrophobically modified soluble polymers have recently attracted much attention because of their potential application in drug delivery systems [13]. Such amphiphiles are able to spontaneously form micelles or nanoparticles via undergoing intra- and/or intermolecular association between hydrophobic moieties in aqueous environment. The hydrophobic parts form the core of the nanoparticles, which is a host system for various hydrophobic drugs, while the hydrophilic backbone forms corona or outer shells enwrapping the hydrophobic core. This shell prevents the inactivation of the encapsulated drug molecules by decreasing the contact with the inactivating species in the aqueous (blood) phase [46]. Furthermore, these polymeric nanoparticles exhibit unique characteristics, such as special rheological features, a rather narrow size distribution, considerable lower critical aggregation concentrations (CAC) than surfactant of low molecular weight, and thermodynamic stability [4, 79]. Recently, self-assembled nanoparticles based on natural polysaccharides have been of particular interest because of their good biocompatibility, biodegradability, reduced toxic side effects, and improved therapeutic effects [1012].

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a natural mucopolysaccharide that consists of alternating residues D-glucuronic acid and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. HA plays a key role in the structure and organization of the extracellular matrix, transport of nutrients, a regulation of cell adhesion, morphogenesis, and modulation of inflammation [1316]. The immunoneutrality and nontoxicity of HA make it as an attractive building block for new biocompatible and biodegradable polymers [17]. HA has been applied in drug delivery systems, tissue engineering, and viscous supplementation [18]. Its major advantages as a drug carrier consist of its ability to bind CD44, a specific membrane receptor frequently overexpressed on the tumor cell surface [19, 20]. That is, targeting of anticancer agents to tumor cells and tumor metastases can be accomplished by receptor-mediated uptake of complexes of these agents and HA. Nevertheless, the poor biomechanical properties of HA prevent generation of new biomaterials, a fact that has given rise to a variety of chemical modifications of HA for providing mechanically and chemically stable materials [21]. The resulting HA derivatives have better physicochemical properties than the native polymer, but retaining the biocompatibility and biodegradability of native HA. Previous studies have been performed on several different HA derivatives, for drug delivery, such as films, hydrogels, bioconjugates, and microspheres [2225]. But few studies about nano-scaled HA derivatives have been reported [26, 27]. Nanoparticles as drug carriers have been considered to provide opportunities for the site-specific delivery of drugs by the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect, and they have the ability to dissolve hydrophobic agents and protect the bioactive drug from host [2830].

Herein the hydrophobically modified HA nanoparticles with favorable physicochemical properties are promising as drug delivery system for the pharmaceutical applications. In this study, chemical conjugates of HA and DOCA were synthesized by covalent attachment of DOCA to HA through amide formation. Physicochemical characteristics of the amphiphilic HA-DOCA conjugates in aqueous phase were revealed by dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microscopy and fluorescence probe techniques. Deoxycholic acid is known to form micelles in water as a result of its amphiphilicity [31]. Thus, it is expected that HA, hydrophobically modified with deoxycholic acid, will induce self-assembled aggregates.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Hyaluronic acid (HA) (average Mn = 16600 Da) was purchased from Freda Biochemical company (Shandong, China). Deoxycholic acids (DOCA), 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), N,N-dicyclohexyl carbodiimide (DCC), and cetylpyridinum chloride (CPC) were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (MO, USA). These reagents were all of analytical grade and used as received. Pyrene, as fluorescence probe was purchased from Sigma and purified by double recrystallization from absolute ethanol. Water was purified by distillation, deionization, and reverse osmosis (Milli-Q plus, Bedford, UK).

2.2. Synthesis of N-Deoxycholylethylenediamine (DOCA-NH2)

Firstly, the carboxylic group of deoxycholic acid was activated, as reported previously (11). In brief, DOCA (3.54 g) was mixed with DCC (2.40 g) and NHS (1.48 g) in 30 mL of THF. The feed mole ratio of DOCA, DCC and NHS were 1 : 1.2 : 1.2. The concentration of DCC and NHS was slightly higher than DOCA in order to activate DOCA completely. The mixture was allowed to react for 12 h at room temperature under a nitrogen atmosphere, and the precipitated dicyclohexylurea was removed by filtration. The filtered solution was poured into excessive hexane and the remaining NHS was dissolved in the hexane. The succinimido DOCA precipitate was filtered off and washed thoroughly with hexane, followed by vacuum-drying (DZF, Chemat, USA) at room temperature. The succinimido DOCA was stored at 0°C before use.

The N-deoxycholy-ethylenediamine (DOCA-NH2) was synthesized by introducing ethylenediamine to the succinimido DOCA. The succinimido DOCA (5 g, 10 mmoL) was dissolved in DMF (20 mL) and the solution was slowly added dropwise into ethylenediamine solution (70 mL, 1 moL) in 250 mL beaker with separatory funnel (34731-00, Cole-parmer, USA). The free mole ratio of succinimido DOCA and ethylenediamine was about 1 : 100. After reaction for 6 h, the mixture was precipitated in exceed distilled water. The filtered precipitation was carefully washed three times with distilled water and vacuum-drying at room temperature to obtain white powder DOCA-NH2.

2.3. Preparation of HA-DOCA (HD) Conjugates

HA (0.1 g) was dissolved in formamide (5 mL) during gentle magnetic stirring, in a 20 mL beaker, at room temperature. Different amounts of EDC (the mole ratio to HA was 5 : 1, 10 : 1, 15 : 1, respectively) were thereafter added to the HA solution. Different amounts of DOCA-NH2 (the mole ratio to HA was 10 : 1, 20 : 1, 40 : 1, respectively) were dissolved in DMF (5 mL) in a 20 mL beaker, by gentle heating (at 50°C) and added into the mixed solution of HA and EDC. The resulting solution was thereafter cooled at room temperature and then stirred under a nitrogen atmosphere for 24 h. The reaction mixture was extensively dialyzed against the excess amount of water/acetone (1v/3v-1v/1v) and distilled water for 3 days, followed by lyophilization.

Various HD conjugates were prepared by controlling the free mole ratios of DOCA-NH2 to HA. The degree of substitution (DS), defined as the number of DOCA per one HA molecules, was determined by a titration method as previously reported (11). Briefly, HD conjugates (50 mg) were diffused in distilled water (20 mL) in a 50 mL beaker during magnetic stirring. After adding 0.05 mL of 0.1 N HCl, the solution was titrated with 0.01 N NaOH using microtitrator (PAX 100-3, Burkard, UK) while stirring and measuring the pH (Delta 320, Mettler Toledo, Switzerland).

The consumed amount of NaOH solution when the pH reached neutral value was recorded. By that, the DS of DOCA was calculated using the difference in the amounts of NaOH solution added to the solutions between standard HA solution and HD conjugate solutions.

2.4. Preparation of Self-Assembled Nanoparticles of HA-DOCA Conjugates

The HD conjugates were suspended in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h. The solution was then sonicated three times using a probe-type sonifier (Sonics Ultrasonic Processor, VC750) at 90 W for 2 min each, in which the pulse was turned off for 1 s with the interval of 5 s to prevent the increase in temperature. Solutions of different concentrations (0.0001–1 mg/mL) were obtained by diluting the stock solution with distilled water.

2.5. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy

The 1H NMR spectra of the conjugates were obtained using a 500-MHz NMR (UNIYTINOVA-500 NMR, VARIAN) at 25°C. Samples of HA and HD conjugates were separately dissolved in solutions of D2O or CDCl3 (analytical reagent, Sigma), yielding a concentration of 10 mg/mL. The measurement conditions were as follows: a spectral window of 500 Hz, 32 k data points, a pulse angle of 30°, an acquisition time of 2.03 s, and 32 scans with a delay of 1 s between scan [32].

2.6. Particle Size Distribution

To determine the average particle size and size distribution of self-aggregates, dynamic laser light scattering were performed using a helium ion laser system (Spectra Physics Laser Model 127-35). Three milliliters of self-aggregates suspension in distilled water (HD9:  1 mg/mL) was put into polystyrene latex cells and measured at a detector angle of 90°, a wavelength of 633 nm, and a temperature of 25°C.

2.7. Measurement of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

The fluorescence measurements were used to determine the critical aggregation concentration as previously described by Liu et al. [32]. Pyrene, used as a hydrophobic probe, was purified by repeated recrystallization from ethanol and vacuum-dried at 20°C. Purified pyrene was dissolved in pure ethanol (analytical reagent, Sigma) at the concentration of 0.04 mg/mL. About of 20 L of the result in solution was added into a 20 mL test tube and the ethanol was evacuated under purging of nitrogen gas. Four milliliters of HD nanoparticles solution was subsequently added to the test tube, resulting in a final pyrene concentration of  M. The concentration of nanoparticles in the solution ranged from  mg/mL to 1 mg/mL. The mixture was incubated for 3 h in a water bath at 65°C and shaken in a SHA-B shaking water bath GuoHua company, Hebei, China overnight at 20°C. Pyrene emission spectra were obtained using a Shimadzu RF-5301PC fluorescence spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan). For measurements of intensity ratios for the third and the first peaks in the emission spectra for pyrene, the slit openings for excitation and emission were set at 15 and 1.5 nm, respectively. The excitation and emission wavelengths were 343 and 390 nm, respectively. The spectra were accumulated with an integration time of 3 s/nm.

The hydrophobicity of self-aggregates in this study was estimated by measuring the equilibrium constant for partitioning of pyrene, between the water and nanoparticles phase as described by Wilhelm et al. [33], Where and are the intensity ratios at high and low concentration ranges of self-aggregates in Figure 6, and is the intensity ratios at the intermediate HD nanoparticle concentration region. is the weight fraction of DOCA in the conjugates, is the concentration of the HD nanoparticles, and is the density of the inner core of self-aggregates, assumed to be equal to the density of DOCA(1.31 g/mL) [34].

The aggregation number of an associating DOCA hydrophobic domain was estimated by using the steady-state fluorescence quenching technique. CPC was used as quencher dissolving in distilled water to different concentrations ( M). The CPC solution was added to the nanoparticle suspension with pyrene just before the measurement. Steady-state quenching data in a microheterogeneous system such as an aqueous nanoparticle suspension fit in the quenching kinetics in [35] Where and are the fluorescence intensities, in the presence or absence of a quencher, respectively, is the concentration of the quencher, and is the concentration of hydrophobic domains in a polymer self-aggregates. Thus, can be obtained from the slope of and the aggregation number per single hydrophobic microdomain is given by

2.8. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

To measure the morphology and size distribution of the nanoparticles, swatches were prepared by dropping the sample solution (1 mg/mL) onto a Formvar-coated copper grid. The grid was held horizontally for 2 min to allow the molecular aggregates to deposit. The surface water was then removed by tapping with a filter paper (9 cm, Xinhua company, China), followed by air-drying. One drop of 2% uranyl acetate solution (analytical reagent, Sigma) was added to the grid to give a negative stain for nanoparticles. The grid was then allowed to stand for 3 min at room temperature before the excess staining solution was removed by draining as above. The dried grid containing the nanoparticles was visualized using a Philips EM 400 transmission electron microscope (Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V, the Netherlands) at an acceleration voltage of 80 KV.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of HA-DOCA Conjugates

Firstly, we activated DOCA with DCC and NHS then introduced a primary amino group to DOCA using ethylenediamine. For the synthesis of HD conjugates, we chemically coupled DOCA-NH2 to HA with EDC as a cross-linker. EDC is a so-called “zero-length” cross-linker, which gives an amide linkage without leaving a spacer molecule. By this coupling reaction, various HD conjugates were prepared by controlling the free mole ratios of DOCA-NH2 to HA. The schemes for the introduction amine group to the carboxylic acid of DOCA and subsequent coupling reaction of HA and N-deoxycholylethylenediamine (DOCA-NH2) are shown in Figure 1.

The presence of DOCA in HA was verified by the characteristic peaks of DOCA appearing in the 1H NMR spectra. Figure 2 shows the 1H NMR spectrum of HA and HD conjugates in different solvent systems including both D2O and CDCl3. The proton assignment of HA (Figure 2(a)) is as follows: (3H, NHCO–CH3),3–3.9 = (1H, H-2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) [36]. The proton assignment of HD (Figure 2(b)) is as follows: 67 = (3H, 18-CH3), δ0.85 = (3H, 19-CH3), δ0.99 = (3H, 21-CH3), 06–2.32 = (25H, steroidal H), 22 = (3H, –NH–CO–CH3) [37]. The presence of DOCA in HA was evaluated by the characteristic peaks of DOCA appearing at 0.85–2.3 ppm in the spectra (Figure 2(b)).

Various HD conjugates with different amounts of DOCA were prepared by changing the feed ratio of HA to DOCA. The results indicated that the degree of substitution (DS) of DOCA increases as the added feed ratio of DOCA and EDC increases. EDC could react with the carboxyl group of the HA to form an active ester intermediate which could chemically couple with DOCA-NH2. The DS is in the range from 5.9 to 9.4 per one HA molecule in this experiment. The mean molecular weight and DS are summarized in Table 1.

Sampl e a Feed rati o b M n c DS X d (%)

HD61 : 10189255.912.3
HD71 : 20195947.615.3
HD91 : 40203049.418.2

a H A-DOCA (HD) conjugates, where the number indicates the DS of DOCA. b M ole ratio of HA : DOCA-NH2. c N umber-average molecular weight, estimated from the titration results. d W eight fraction of DOCA in a HA molecule.
3.2. Formation of Self-Aggregated Nanoparticles

The formation of self-assembled nanoparticles in an aqueous phase and the critical aggregation concentration (CAC) for HD self-aggregates were confirmed by the fluorescence technique with pyrene as a fluorescence probe. Pyrene was chosen as the fluorescence probe because its condensed aromatic structure is sensitive to polarity, and it produces distinctive excimer fluorescence under conditions of sufficiently high concentration and mobility [38]. When the self-aggregates are formed in an aqueous phase, pyrene molecules are preferentially located within or close to the hydrophobic microdomain of the nanoparticles rather than to the aqueous phase. Consequently, there was a remarkable change in its fluorescence spectra, such as an increase in the quantum yield [38, 39]. Figure 3 shows the typical fluorescent emission spectra of pyrene in solutions of HD nanoparticles (sample HD9) with various concentrations. The fluorescent emission spectra of pyrene in solutions exhibit four predominant peaks, one for each concentration. The fluorescence intensities did remarkably increase with the increasing of self-aggregates concentrations especially for the first and third peaks suggesting that pyrene was shifted from polar water environment to less polar one because pyrene had a longer lifetime and a higher quantum yield in the non-polar environment. The intensities of fluorescence increase substantially, suggesting the formation of nanoparticles and the incorporation of pyrene in the hydrophobic core of self-aggregates.

The partition of pyrene from aqueous to hydrophobic phase of nanoparticles causes the ratios of peak III with peak I to increase with the increasing of HD conjugates concentration especially above the CAC. Critical aggregation concentration (CAC), which is the threshold concentration of self-aggregate formation by intra- and/or intermolecular association, can be determined from the change of intensity ratio of pyrene in the presence of polymeric amphiphiles. The intensity ratio of is sensitive to the polarity of the microenvironment where the pyrene exists: the larger the ratio, the less polar microenvironment of pyrene. Figure 4 exhibits the changes of the value as a function of logarithm of concentration of HD self-aggregates for samples of HD6, HD7 and HD9. At low concentrations, the value remains nearly unchanged meaning that there is a lack of hydrophobic nonpolar environment with no occurrence of assemblage. However, the intensity ratios begin to increase with further increase in concentration, indicating the occurrence of self-aggregation of HD resulting from intermolecular hydrophobic interactions between the DOCA groups. The CAC was taken as the intersection of a flat region in the low concentration extreme and sigmoid region in the crossover region. The CAC values determined for HD conjugates HD6, HD7 and HD9 are 0.056, 0.037 and 0.025 mg/mL, respectively, which agree well with the conjugate compositions as the DOCA group in conjugates is increased in the same order as listed in Table 2. The CAC values of deoxycholic acid modified HA are similar to that of the deoxycholic acid modified chitosans self-aggregates (CAC are in the range of 0.01–0.07 mg/mL) [5, 40], but much lower than the critical micelle concentration (cmc) of low-molecular-weight surfactants (2.3 mg/mL for sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in water and 1.0 mg/mL for deoxycholic acid in water) [41, 42]. The lower CAC values of the hydrophobic modified HA as compared with low-molecular-weight surfactants may be one of the important characteristics of polymeric amphiphiles, indicating the stability of HD self-aggregate in dilute condition.

sampleCA C a (mg/mL) 𝐾 𝑣 b (×104) 𝑁 c D O C A 𝑁 d c h a i n


a C ritical aggregation concentration determined by pyrene emission spectra. b B inding equilibrium constant for pyrene in distilled water in the presence of HA-DOCA nanoparticles. c A ggregation number of DOCA moieties per one hydrophobic domain. d N umber of HA-DOCA conjugate polymer chains per one hydrophobic domain.
3.3. Microscopic Structure of Self-Aggregates

Figure 4 shows that above the CAC, the intensity ratio increases due to the binding of pyrene is larger. This suggests that pyrene preferentially interacts with amphiphiles phase than to self aggregate and then distributes into the inner core of self-aggregates. The partition of pyrene between the aqueous and self-aggregates phase could reflect the hydrophobicity of the inner core of nanoparticles. The hydrophobicity is one important factor for its application as a drug carrier and it can be expressed as equilibrium constant of pyrene, which is one of the critical parameters related to self-assembled nanoparticle stability. At the concentration range of HD conjugates from 0.0001 mg/mL to 1 mg/mL, the mean diameter and the size distribution factor of self-aggregates were not changed. Therefore, we assume a simple equilibrium, the equilibrium constant for partitioning of pyrene between the water and micellar phases can be calculated according to the (1). Where the values of pyrene can be determined using a plot of versus the HD nanoparticle concentration as shown in Figure 5. Table 2 summarizes the values for pyrene, and they are in the range of . As shown in Table 2, values increase with increasing DS of DOCA in the conjugates, indicating the increase of hydrophobicity of inner core of the nanoparticles with the DS. On the basis of these values, we determined that HD self-aggregates also formed less polar microdomains and that their hydrophobic cores were covered with hydrophilic HA shells. By comparing to the HD self-aggregates, other polymer amphiphiles based on poly (ethylene oxide) or poly (2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) as hydrophilic blocks have higher values [33, 43]. Whereas the hydrophobicity of the interior core of HD self-aggregates is very similar to glycol chitosan nanoparticle bearing -cholanic acid as a hydrophobic segment and heparin-DOCA nanoparticle, in addition it is higher than glycol chitosan-DOCA nanoparticle (~103).

To investigate the associating number of hydrophobic moieties in one self-aggregate and to identify the microstructure of nanoparticles, a fluorescence quenching method was used which has been successfully applied to estimate the microstructure of polymeric amphiphiles [39, 44]. Figure 6 shows the intensity of pyrene fluorescence as a function of CPC concentration in the presence of the HD conjugates at the concentration of 0.5 mg/mL in water. There is a good liner relationship with all the cases (correlation factor, 9974 (HD6), 9974 (HD7), 9892 (HD9)) and the date fit well to (2). Hence, the concentration of hydrophobic domains in self-aggregates could be obtained from the slope of the straight line. The mean aggregation numbers of DOCA groups per single hydrophobic domain are calculated from (3) and the values are listed in Table 2. The aggregation number increase with increasing of the DS of DOCA which means that the conjugated DOCA groups may all interassociate to form hydrophobic microdomains. The values are much higher than the aggregation number of sodium deoxycholate in aqueous media [45]. The big aggregation number in self-aggregates is considered to result from the DOCA moieties didn’t form dense hydrophobic interior core because of the limited mobility and steric hindrance of DOCA covalently attached to HA. The value is defined as the number of polymer chains per one hydrophobic domain. There are about 2.98–4.57 chains of HD conjugates forming one hydrophobic microdomain from the fluorescence quenching study. The values increased with the increase of DS of DOCA which means that compact hydrophobic domains may be formed with enhanced hydrophobicity. The increase of and values corresponds to the DS of DOCA which indicates the higher hydrophobicity resulting from the increasing DOCA moieties making the reinforced association between single polymer chains. From the microscopic characteristics of HD conjugate, it can be concluded that one HD nanoparticle could have multiple hydrophobic inter-cores. The results are very similar to the other hydrophobic modified polysaccharide biocopolymers with different fatty acids and bile acids [8, 9, 11, 44].

3.4. Characteristics of Self-Aggregated Nanoparticles

The self-aggregated nanoparticles of HD conjugates were produced by a simple sonication method in aqueous condition. Figure 7 shows the particle size and distribution of self-aggregates of HD conjugates in a distilled water solution determined by dynamic laser light scattering. A majority of nanoparticles size was in 100–600 nm with a mean hydrodynamic diameter of 293.5 nm as shown in Figure 7. The polydispersity factor of self-aggregates was 0.108 and it demonstrated a narrow particle size distribution. The mean diameter of each nanoparticle was reproducible with repeated experiments and it was not changed with respect to the sonication time that ranged from 3 to 20 min. The size of Nanoparticle was not significantly affected by changing concentration of HD conjugates. This implies that the interactions between self-aggregates are almost negligible.

TEM observation demonstrated the near spherical shape of self-aggregates with narrow size distribution, as shown in Figure 8. The mean diameter and size distribution of self-aggregates appeared to be a little different from the results obtained by dynamic light scattering measurement. For example, the size measured by the TEM methods was smaller than the laser light scattering method. This might be due to the different conditions for sample preparation. The TEM images depicted the size at the dried state of the sample, whereas the laser light scattering method involves the measurement of size in the hydrated state. In other words, the size determined by TEM is an actual diameter (dry state) of the nanoparticles, whereas the size measured by the dynamic laser scattering method is a hydrodynamic diameter (hydrated state) of the nanoparticles. Therefore, in the hydrated state, the nanoparticles will have a higher hydrodynamic volume due to solvent effect; hence, the size measured by the laser light scattering method was higher than the TEM method [32].

4. Conclusion

Novel polymeric amphiphiles, partially hydrophobic modified hyaluronic acid with deoxycholic acid as hydrophobic moieties in an aqueous solution, were studied. The diameters of self-aggregates were in the range of 100–600 nm with a mean hydrodynamic diameter of 293.5 nm. The critical aggregation concentrations of HD conjugates depended on the DS of deoxycholic acid in a range of 0.025–0.056 mg/mL. The TEM images of self-aggregates showed a spherical shape. The and values, confirmed by fluorescence probe studies, were substantially dependent on the DS of DOCA. Results demonstrate that a hydrophobic domain was composed of multiple HD polymer chains.


The authors thank the financial supports high-tech research and development plan (863 plan) of China (2007AA10Z349) and Dr. Mikael Gallstedt for reviewing the manuscript.


  1. G. S. Kwon and T. Okano, “Polymeric micelles as new drug carriers,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 107–116, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. K. Akiyoshi, S. Kobayashi, S. Shichibe et al., “Self-assembled hydrogel nanoparticle of cholesterol-bearing pullulan as a carrier of protein drugs: complexation and stabilization of insulin,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 313–320, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. S. Park, T. H. Han, K. Y. Lee et al., “N-acetyl histidine-conjugated glycol chitosan self-assembled nanoparticles for intracytoplasmic delivery of drugs: endocytosis, exocytosis and drug release,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. K. Akiyoshi and J. Sunamoto, “Supramolecular assembly of hydrophobized polysaccharides,” Supramolecular Science, vol. 3, no. 1–3, pp. 157–163, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. Y. Lee, W. H. Jo, I. C. Kwon, Y. H. Kim, and S. Y. Jeong, “Physicochemical characteristics of self-aggregates of hydrophobically modified chitosans,” Langmuir, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 2329–2332, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  6. J. Djordjevic, M. Barch, and K. E. Uhrich, “Polymeric micelles based on amphiphilic scorpion-like macromolecules: novel carriers for water-insoluble drugs,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. Kuroda, K. Fujimoto, J. Sunamoto, and K. Akiyoshi, “Hierarchical self-assembly of hydrophobically modified pullulan in water: gelation by networks of nanoparticles,” Langmuir, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 3780–3786, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. K. Kim, S. Kwon, J. H. Park et al., “Physicochemical characterizations of self-assembled nanoparticles of glycol chitosan-deoxycholic acid conjugates,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1154–1158, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Nichifor, A. Lopes, A. Carpov, and E. Melo, “Aggregation in water of dextran hydrophobically modified with bile acids,” Macromolecules, vol. 32, no. 21, pp. 7078–7085, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. H. Kim, Y. S. Kim, S. Kim et al., “Hydrophobically modified glycol chitosan nanoparticles as carriers for paclitaxel,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 111, no. 1-2, pp. 228–234, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Hamidi, A. Azadi, and P. Rafiei, “Hydrogel nanoparticles in drug delivery,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 60, no. 15, pp. 1638–1649, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Z. Liu, Y. Jiao, Y. Wang, C. Zhou, and Z. Zhang, “Polysaccharides-based nanoparticles as drug delivery systems,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 60, no. 15, pp. 1650–1662, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. E. Scott, “Extracellular matrix, supramolecular organisation and shape,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 187, no. 2, pp. 259–269, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  14. C. Hardwick, K. Hoare, R. Owens et al., “Molecular cloning of a novel hyaluronan receptor that mediates tumor cell motility,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 117, no. 6, pp. 1343–1350, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. Collis, C. Hall, L. Lange, M. Ziebell, R. Prestwich, and E. A. Turley, “Rapid hyaluronan uptake is associated with enhanced motility: implications for an intracellular mode of action,” FEBS Letters, vol. 440, no. 3, pp. 444–449, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. B. Gerdin and R. Hällgren, “Dynamic role of hyaluronan (HYA) in connective tissue activation and inflammation,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 242, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  17. D. Campoccia, P. Doherty, M. Radice, P. Brun, G. Abatangelo, and D. F. Williams, “Semisynthetic resorbable materials from hyaluronan esterification,” Biomaterials, vol. 19, no. 23, pp. 2101–2127, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  18. G. D. Prestwich, D. M. Marecak, J. F. Marecek, K. P. Vercruysse, and M. R. Ziebell, “Chemical modification of hyaluronic acid for drug delivery, biomaterials, and biochemical probes,” in The Chemistry, Biology, and Medical Applications of Hyaluronan and Its Derivatives, T. C. Laurent, Ed., pp. 43–65, Protland Press, London, UK, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  19. W. Knudson, “Tumor-associated hyaluronan: providing an extracellular matrix that facilitates invasion,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 148, no. 6, pp. 1721–1726, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  20. W. Knudson, G. Chow, and C. B. Knudson, “CD44-mediated uptake and degradation of hyaluronan,” Matrix Biology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 15–23, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. W. Kuo, D. A. Swann, and G. D. Prestwich, “Chemical modification of hyaluronic acid by carbodiimides,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 232–241, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  22. Y. Luo, K. R. Kirker, and G. D. Prestwich, “Cross-linked hyaluronic acid hydrogel films: new biomaterials for drug delivery,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 169–184, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. Segura, P. H. Chung, and L. D. Shea, “DNA delivery from hyaluronic acid-collagen hydrogels via a substrate-mediated approach,” Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 1575–1584, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Y. Luo, N. J. Bernshaw, Z. R. Lu, J. Kopecek, and G. D. Prestwich, “Targeted delivery of doxorubicin by HPMA copolymer-hyaluronan bioconjugates,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 396–402, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. E. Esposito, E. Menegatti, and R. Cortesi, “Hyaluronan-based microspheres as tools for drug delivery: a comparative study,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 288, no. 1, pp. 35–49, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. K. Y. Choi, S. Lee, K. Park et al., “Preparation and characterization of hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel nanoparticles,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 69, no. 5-6, pp. 1591–1595, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. Y. Choi, K. H. Min, J. H. Na et al., “Self-assembled hyaluronic acid nanoparticles as a potential drug carrier for cancer therapy: synthesis, characterization, and in vivo biodistribution,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 24, pp. 4102–4107, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. K. Kataoka, T. Matsumoto, M. Yokoyama et al., “Doxorubicin-loaded poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(β-benzyl-L-aspartate) copolymer micelles: their pharmaceutical characteristics and biological significance,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 64, no. 1–3, pp. 143–153, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. Lavasanifar, J. Samuel, and G. S. Kwon, “Poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(L-amino acid) micelles for drug delivery,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 169–190, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. S. Soppimath, T. M. Aminabhavi, A. R. Kulkarni, and W. E. Rudzinski, “Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles as drug delivery devices,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 70, no. 1-2, pp. 1–20, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. Enhsen, W. Kramer, and G. Wess, “Bile acids in drug discovery,” Drug Discovery Today, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 409–418, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. C. G. Liu, K. G. H. Desai, X. G. Chen, and H. J. Park, “Linolenic acid-modified chitosan for formation of self-assembled nanoparticles,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 437–441, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Wilhelm, C. L. Zhao, Y. Wang et al., “Poly(styrene-ethylene oxide) block copolymer micelle formation in water: a fluorescence probe study,” Macromolecules, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1033–1040, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  34. I. Astafieva, X. F. Zhong, and A. Eisenberg, “Critical micellization phenomena in block polyelectrolyte solutions,” Macromolecules, vol. 26, no. 26, pp. 7339–7352, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  35. E. Alami, M. Almgren, W. Brown, and J. François, “Aggregation of hydrophobically end-capped poly(ethylene oxide) in aqueous solutions. Fluorescence and light-scattering studies,” Macromolecules, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2229–2243, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  36. S. K. Kim, K. Kim, S. Lee et al., “Evaluation of absorption of heparin-DOCA conjugates on the intestinal wall using a surface plasmon resonance,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 861–870, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. V. Crescenzi, A. Francescangeli, A. Taglienti, D. Capitani, and L. Mannina, “Synthesis and partial characterization of hydrogels obtained via glutaraldehyde crosslinking of acetylated chitosan and of hyaluronan derivatives,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1045–1054, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Y. Hu, X. Jiang, Y. Ding et al., “Preparation and drug release behaviors of nimodipine-loaded poly(caprolactone)-poly(ethylene oxide)-polylactide amphiphilic copolymer nanoparticles,” Biomaterials, vol. 24, no. 13, pp. 2395–2404, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. K. Kalyanasundaram and J. K. Thomas, “Environmental effects on vibronic band intensities in pyrene monomer fluorescence and their application in studies of micellar systems,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 99, no. 7, pp. 2039–2044, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  40. K. Y. Lee, W. H. Jo, I. C. Kwon, Y. H. Kim, and S. Y. Jeong, “Structural determination and interior polarity of self-aggregates prepared from deoxycholic acid-modified chitosan in water,” Macromolecules, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 378–383, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  41. Y. Nagasaki, T. Okada, C. Scholz, M. Iijima, M. Kato, and K. Kataoka, “The reactive polymeric micelle based on an aldehyde-ended poly(ethylene giycol)/poly(lactide) block copolymer,” Macromolecules, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1473–1479, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  42. G. Kwon, M. Naito, M. Yokoyama, T. Okano, Y. Sakurai, and K. Kataoka, “Micelles based on AB block copolymers of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(β-benzyl L-aspartate),” Langmuir, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 945–949, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  43. C. Kim, S. C. Lee, S. W. Kang, I. C. Kwon, Y. H. Kim, and S. Y. Jeong, “Synthesis and the micellar characteristics of poly(ethylene oxide)-deoxycholic acid conjugates,” Langmuir, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 4792–4797, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. K. Akiyoshi, S. Deguchi, H. Tajima, T. Nishikawa, and J. Sunamoto, “Microscopic structure and thermoresponsiveness of a hydrogel nanoparticle by self-assembly of a hydrophobized polysaccharide,” Macromolecules, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 857–861, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  45. J. P. Kratohvil, W. P. Hsu, and D. I. Kwok, “How large are the micelles of di-α-hydroxy bile salts at the critical micellization concentrations in aqueous electrolyte solutions? Results for sodium taurodeoxycholate and sodium deoxycholate,” Langmuir, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 256–258, 1986. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2010 Xuemeng Dong and Chenguang Liu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.