Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2011 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 439162 | 6 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/439162

Ultrasonochemical-Assisted Synthesis of CuO Nanorods with High Hydrogen Storage Ability

Academic Editor: Junliang Zhang
Received21 Feb 2011
Revised24 Apr 2011
Accepted13 May 2011
Published17 Jul 2011

Abstract

Uniform CuO nanorods with different size have been synthesized in a water-alcohol solution through a fast and facile ultrasound irradiation assistant route. Especially, the as-prepared CuO nanorods have shown a strong size-induced enhancement of electrochemical hydrogen storage performance and exhibit a notable hydrogen storage capacity and big BET surface area. These results further implied that the as-prepared CuO nanorods could be a promising candidate for electrochemical hydrogen storage applications. The observation of the comparison experiments with different concentrations of NaOH, ethanol, CTAB, and HTMA while keeping other synthetic parameters unchanged leads to the morphology and size change of CuO products.

1. Introduction

It is widely accepted that the properties of nanomaterials are not only closely related to their sizes but also to their shapes. Therefore, controlling the morphologies of nanomaterials is one of the most important issues and effective ways to obtain desirable properties. one-dimensional (1D) nanoscaled materials such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [1], semiconductor nanowires, and nanobelts [27] exhibit interesting and useful properties and may be applied as building blocks for the integration of the next generation of nanoelectronics, ultrasmall optical devices, biosensors, and so forth. As a p-type semiconductor with a narrow band gap (1.2 eV), CuO nanomaterials have been widely exploited for diverse applications, such as heterogeneous catalysts [810], photoelectrochemical materials [11], gas sensors [12], lithium ion electrode materials [13], electrochemical hydrogen storage materials [14], and field emission (FE) emitters [15, 16]. Many recent efforts have been directed toward the fabrication of nanostructured CuO to enhance its performance in currently existing applications. In particular, a variety of 1D CuO nanostructures have been prepared by high-temperature approaches [1725] and low-temperature wet chemical approaches [2632]. Generally, the above-mentioned methods for 1D CuO nanomaterials require high temperature or additional templates to act as a support and are constrained by expense and complex. Comparatively, the ultrasonic approach was more attractive for both its simplicity and commercial feasibility. Different from other traditional chemical methods, the sonochemistry route is based on acoustic cavitations through the formation, growth, and collapse of bubbles in the liquid. The implosive collapse is an adiabatic process, which generates localized hot spots with transient temperatures of 5000–25000 K, pressures of about 1800 atm [33, 34], and heating and cooling rates in excess of 1010 K/s [35, 36]. These extreme conditions have been applied to prepare amorphous metals, carbides, oxides, sulfides, and so forth in various media [3741].

Herein, we present a fast and facile ultrasound (US) irradiation assistant route to mass-synthesize uniform CuO nanorods with different size in a water-alcohol solution. Especially, the as-prepared CuO nanorods have shown a strong size-induced enhancement of electrochemical hydrogen storage performance and exhibit a notable hydrogen storage capacity and big BET surface area. These results further implied that the as-prepared CuO nanorods could be a promising candidate for electrochemical hydrogen storage applications.

2. Experimental

In a typical experiment, all of the chemicals were of analytical grade and were used as received. Aqueous solutions were prepared using distilled water. Firstly, 0.11 g CuAC2·H2O was dissolved in the solution mixed with 15 mL ethanol and 35 mL distilled water in a 100 mL beaker. Then 8 mL NaOH aqueous solution (0.5 M) and 0.3 g CTAB were added slowly. After that, the solution was kept under US irradiation at room temperature for 45 minutes. Finally, the obtained precipitates were collected and washed several times with absolute ethanol and distilled water. The comparison experiments with different concentrations of NaOH, ethanol, CTAB, and HTMA have also been conducted as listed in Table 1.


Sample no.CuAC2·H2O (g)0.5 M NaOH (mL)Ethanol (mL)H2O (mL)CTAB (C) or HTMA (H) (g)

10.11415350.3 (C)
20.1185000.3 (C)
30.11415350.2 (C)
40.11415350
50.11425250.3 (H)
60.1145000.3 (H)
70.11415350.2 (H)
80.11415350.1 (H)

X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) analysis was carried out with a Japan Rigaku D/max-rA X-ray diffractometer with graphite monochromatized Cu Kα radiation (𝜆=1.54178 Å). The scan rate of 0.05°/s was used to record the patterns in the 2θ range of 20–70°. SEM image was obtained by a JSM-6700 F field emission scanning electron microanalyser (JEOL, Japan), whereby the resulting powder was mounted on a copper slice. HRTEM images were recorded on a JEOL-2010 TEM at an acceleration voltage of 200 KV. The porous nature of the nanorods was further confirmed by the measurement of the pore size distribution, which was obtained by the nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) methods on an OMNISORP-100CX accelerated surface area and porosimetry system. The electrochemical measurements were carried out following the method reported in [14] with slight modification. Briefly, the electrode was fabricated by directly pressing the synthesized CuO powders on a sheet of nickel foam at 50 MPa. All of the experiments were performed in a three-electrode cell in 6 M KOH at 25°C under normal atmosphere. The CuO nanostructures were used as the working electrode, Ni(OH)2/NiOOH as the counterelectrode, and Ag/AgCl as a reference electrode. The CuO nanostructures electrode was charged for 3 h at a current density after a 2 s rest. All of the electrochemical hydrogen storage experiments were carried out using the Land battery system (CT2001A) at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

The overall crystallinity and purity of the as-synthesized samples were investigated by XRD and HRTEM measurement. As shown in Figure 1(a), all the indexed diffraction peaks in the XRD pattern show the presence of monoclinic CuO (spacegroup: C2/c) with lattice constants 𝑎=4.69 Å, 𝑏=3.42 Å, and 𝑐=5.13 Å, which is in good agreement with the literature values for the bulk CuO (JCPDS, 41–0254). The above result also indicates that the products obtained here are fully monoclinic CuO with high purity and crystalline quality, which is further proved by the HRTEM investment, as shown in Figures 1(c) and 1(d). Figures 1(b) and 1(c) show the large-scale CuO nanorods obtained, from which it can be seen that the nanorod is more than 200 nm long and 10 nm in diameter, and a high yield (>95%) of this 1D form can be easily observed. The HRTEM image in Figure 1(d) indicates that the nanorod is of single crystal and can be indexed as the monoclinic CuO phase, which is in accord with the XRD result. As shown in Figure 1(d), the lattice interplanar spacing has been determined to be 2.76 Å, corresponding to the (110) plane of monoclinic CuO, which suggests that the nanorods grow preferentially through (110) plane stacking.

The measurement of BJH methods showed that the BET surface area of CuO nanorods was 49.8 m2/g, which implied that the CuO nanorods obtained here were a kind of potential porous material, as shown in Figure 2(a). Further study of the pore size distributions of the sample is illustrated in Figure 2(b). The Curve shows the relative pore volume distributions according to the average size of pores, in which there is a distribution centered around 40 nm. Interestingly, the electrochemical study demonstrated that the discharge capacity of CuO nanorods displayed a noticeable electrochemical hydrogen storage ability (~165 mAh/g), which amounts to the 32.8% hydrogen storage capacity of SWNTs, whose discharge capacity is 503 mAh/g, corresponding to 1.84 wt% hydrogen [42]. In the charge curve of CuO nanorods, as shown in Figure 2(c), with the increase of the electrochemical capacity, the potential increases quickly but remains unchanged when the charge capacity reaches 3 mAh/g. One new obvious plateau of potential is observed between 5 mAh/g and 170 mAh/g. This indicates that two different hydrogen adsorption sites [42] exist in the synthesized CuO nanorods; in other words, there are two different electrochemical steps in the charging process. The reaction is expressed as follows:CuOnanorods+H2O+eCuOnanorods/Hsurface+OH(1)CuOnanorods/HsurfaceCuOnanorods/Hinterstitial.(2)

It is assumed that the H was first adsorbed onto the surface of each nanorod and then diffused into the interstitial sites among CuO. The discharge curve also displays two different hydrogen release processes, which further confirms the above results. The cycle life of CuO nanorod electrode is shown in Figure 2(d). After being cycled 50 times at the charge-discharge current density of 30 mA/g, the discharging capacities of CuO nanobelts remain over 20 mAh/g. Compared with the capacities (100 mAh/g and 130 mAh/g) of other 1D CuO nanostructures obtained by us, as shown in Figures 2(e) and 2(f) and Figures 3(a), 3(c), and 3(d), the as-prepared CuO nanorods exhibited higher capacity. The relatively high capacity was considered to be pertinent to the enhanced electrocatalytic activity of the highly porous and layered structures of the synthesized CuO nanorods. And we believe that the investigations of electrochemical hydrogen storage of CuO nanostructures help us to understand the relationship between morphology, size, and properties and thus inspire us to explore new nanostructures with higher hydrogen uptake.

Comparison experiments with different concentrations of NaOH, ethanol, and CTAB while keeping other synthetic parameters unchanged leads to the morphology and size change of CuO products. As shown in Figures 3(a) and 3(b), when the NaOH concentrations were reduced, CuO nanorod bundles composed of rods with smaller size (several nanometers) were obtained. When the ethanol concentrations were increased, short CuO nanorods (~50 nm long) formed, as shown in Figures 3(c) and 3(d). CuO nanorod bundles were also produced when the CTAB mount was reduced or free, as shown in Figures 3(e) and 3(f). When using other surface active reagent (such as hexamethylene tetramine (HTMA)) instead of CTAB, different CuO 1D nanostructures have also been prepared, as shown in Figure 4. Therefore, suitable thermodynamic experimental conditions favor the oriented crystalline growth process of the CuO nanorods. It is also implied that different shapely CuO nanostructures can be controllably synthesized through adjusting the reaction parameters of this US chemical reaction process.

4. Conclusions

In summary, CuO nanorods were synthesized through a fast and facile ultrasound irradiation assistant route. The products exhibit excellent hydrogen storage capacity and big BET surface area. Different shapely CuO nanostructures have been controllably synthesized. The comparison experiments show that the reactant concentrations are critical to the formation of 1D CuO nanostructures. Further research will be performed on more novel cupreous 1D nanostructures exhibiting different electrochemical hydrogen storage performances, in which more excellent hydrogen storage materials might be found.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province, China (nos. E200839 and F200828), the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 21001035 and 51072038), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (no. 20092304120021), Harbin Key Sci-tech Project (no. 2010AA4BG004), Research Fund of Heilongjiang Provincial Education Department (no. 11551418), and the Fundamental Research funds for the Central Universities (no. HEUCF101016 and no. HEUCFT1010), Outstanding Youth Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (Grant no. JC201008), for the financial support of this research.

References

  1. S. Iijima, “Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon,” Nature, vol. 354, no. 6348, pp. 56–58, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  2. Y. Xia and P. Yang, “Chemistry and physics of nanowires,” Advanced Materials, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 351–352, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Z. L. Wang, X. Wang, P. Gao, J. Li, and C. J. Summers, “Rectangular porous ZnO-ZnS nanocables and ZnS nanotubes,” Advanced Materials, vol. 14, no. 23, pp. 1732–1735, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Ma, D. Moore, J. Li, and Z. L. Wang, “Nanobelts, nanocombs, and nanowindmills of wurtzite ZnS,” Advanced Materials, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 228–231, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. P. Gao, M. Zhang, Z. Niu, and Q. Xiao, “A facile solution-chemistry method for Cu(OH)2 nanoribbon arrays with noticeable electrochemical hydrogen storage ability at room temperature,” Chemical Communications, no. 48, pp. 5197–5199, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. Gao, Y. Chen, Y. Wang, Q. Zhang, X. Li, and M. Hu, “A simple recycling and reuse hydrothermal route to ZnO nanorod arrays, nanoribbon bundles, nanosheets, nanocubes and nanoparticles,” Chemical Communications, no. 19, pp. 2762–2764, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. H. Men, P. Gao, B. Zhou et al., “Fast synthesis of ultra-thin ZnSnO3 nanorods with high ethanol sensing properties,” Chemical Communications, vol. 46, no. 40, pp. 7581–7583, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. B. Reitz and E. I. Solomon, “Propylene oxidation on copper oxide surfaces: electronic and geometric contributions to reactivity and selectivity,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 120, no. 44, pp. 11467–11478, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. A. Switzer, H. M. Kothari, P. Poizot, S. Nakanishi, and E. W. Bohannan, “Enantiospecific electrodeposition of a chiral catalyst,” Nature, vol. 425, no. 6957, pp. 490–493, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. F. Mariño, G. Baronetti, M. Laborde et al., “Optimized CuO-CeO2 catalysts for COPROX reaction,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1345–1353, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. S. Chaudhary, A. Agrawal, R. Shrivastav, V. R. Satsangi, and S. Dass, “A study on the photoelectrochemical properties of copper oxide thin films,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 131–134, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Chowdhuri, V. Gupta, K. Sreenivas, R. Kumar, S. Mozumdar, and P. K. Patanjali, “Response speed of SnO2-based H2S gas sensors with CuO nanoparticles,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 84, no. 7, pp. 1180–1182, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. X. P. Gao, J. L. Bao, G. L. Pan et al., “Preparation and electrochemical performance of polycrystalline and single crystalline CuO nanorods as anode materials for Li ion battery,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 18, pp. 5547–5551, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  14. P. Gao, Y. Chen, H. Lv, X. Li, Y. Wang, and Q. Zhang, “Synthesis of CuO nanoribbon arrays with noticeable electrochemical hydrogen storage ability by a simple precursor dehydration route at lower temperature,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 3065–3069, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. T. Hsieh, J. M. Chen, H. H. Lin, and H. C. Shih, “Field emission from various Cuo nanostructures,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 83, no. 16, pp. 3383–3385, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Z. Deng, N. S. Xu, W. Zhang, X. Wen, and S. Yang, “Temperature dependence of field emission from cupric oxide nanobelt films,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 746–748, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. R. Martin, “Nanomaterials: a membrane-based synthetic approach,” Science, vol. 266, no. 5193, pp. 1961–1966, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  18. M. H. Huang, A. Choudrey, and P. Yang, “Ag nanowire formation within mesoporous silica,” Chemical Communications, no. 12, pp. 1063–1064, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  19. T. Seeger, P. Kohler-Redlich, and M. Rühle, “Synthesis of nanometer-sized SiC whiskers in the arc-discharge,” Advanced Materials, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 279–282, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. C. Tang, S. Fan, M. L. de la Chapelle, H. Dang, and P. Li, “Synthesis of gallium phosphide nanorods,” Advanced Materials, vol. 12, no. 18, pp. 1346–1348, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Bhattacharrya, S. K. Saha, and D. Chakravorty, “Nanowire formation in a polymeric film,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, no. 26, pp. 3896–3898, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  22. S. Liu, J. Yue, and A. Gedanken, “Synthesis of long silver nanowires from AgBr nanocrystals,” Advanced Materials, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 656–658, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Bhattacharyya, S. K. Saha, and D. Chakravorty, “Silver nanowires grown in the pores of a silica gel,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 77, no. 23, pp. 3770–3772, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  24. N. R. Jana, L. Gearheart, and C. J. Murphy, “Wet chemical synthesis of silver nanorods and nanowires of controllable aspect ratio,” Chemical Communications, no. 7, pp. 617–618, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  25. S. Iijima, “Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon,” Nature, vol. 354, no. 6348, pp. 56–58, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  26. A. M. Morales and C. M. Lieber, “A laser ablation method for the synthesis of crystalline semiconductor nanowires,” Science, vol. 279, no. 5348, pp. 208–211, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. Yan, Y. Xie, Y. Qian, and X. Liu, “A cluster growth route to quantum-confined CdS nanowires,” Chemical Communications, no. 14, pp. 1293–1294, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  28. M. S. Gudiksen and C. M. Lieber, “Diameter-selective synthesis of semiconductor nanowires,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 122, no. 36, pp. 8801–8802, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. T. J. Trentler, K. M. Hickman, S. C. Goel, A. M. Viano, P. C. Gibbons, and W. E. Buhro, “Solution-liquid-solid growth of crystalline III-V semiconductors: an analogy to vapor-liquid-solid growth,” Science, vol. 270, no. 5243, pp. 1791–1794, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  30. B. Gates, Y. Yin, and Y. Xia, “A solution-phase approach to the synthesis of uniform nanowires of crystalline selenium with lateral dimensions in the range of 10-30 nm,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 122, no. 50, pp. 12582–12583, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Y. Wu and P. Yang, “Germanium nanowire growth via simple vapor transport,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 605–607, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. K. Soulantica, A. Maisonnat, F. Senocq, M.-C. Fromen, M.-J. Casanove, and B. Chaudret, “Selective synthesis of novel In and In3Sn nanowires by an organometallic route at room temperature,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 113, no. 16, pp. 3071–3074, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. K. S. Suslick, S. B. Choe, A. A. Cichowlas, and M. W. Grinstaff, “Sonochemical synthesis of amorphous iron,” Nature, vol. 353, no. 6343, pp. 414–416, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  34. K. S. Suslick, D. A. Hammerton, and R. E. Cline, “The sonochemical hot spot,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 108, no. 18, pp. 5641–5642, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  35. B. P. Barber and S. J. Putterman, “Observation of synchronous picosecond sonoluminescence,” Nature, vol. 352, no. 6333, pp. 318–320, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  36. R. Hiller, S. J. Putterman, and B. P. Barber, “Spectrum of synchronous picosecond sonoluminescence,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 1182–1184, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. G. Z. Wang, B. Y. Geng, X. M. Huang, Y. W. Wang, G. H. Li, and L. D. Zhang, “A convenient ultrasonic irradiation technique for in situ synthesis of zinc sulfide nanocrystallites at room temperature,” Applied Physics A, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 933–936, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. Yin, X. Qian, J. Yin, M. Shi, and G. Zhou, “Preparation of ZnS/PS microspheres and ZnS hollow shells,” Materials Letters, vol. 57, no. 24-25, pp. 3859–3863, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. H. Wang, Y. N. Lu, J. J. Zhu, and H. Y. Chen, “Sonochemical fabrication and characterization of stibnite nanorods,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 42, no. 20, pp. 6404–6411, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. H. Zhang, Z. Chen, Z. L. Wang, and N. B. Ming, “Sonochemical method for the synthesis of antimony sulfide microcrystallites with controllable morphology,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1804–1808, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  41. A. Gedanken, “Using sonochemistry for the fabrication of nanomaterials,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 47–55, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. G. P. Dai, C. Liu, M. Liu, M. Z. Wang, and H. M. Cheng, “Electrochemical hydrogen storage behavior of ropes of aligned single-walled carbon nanotubes,” Nano Letters, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 503–506, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Gang Xiao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1460 Views | 1223 Downloads | 12 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.