Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2011, Article ID 707303, 5 pages
Research Article

Humidity Sensor Based on Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Thin Films

1Department of Applied Physics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
2Department of physics, Chongqing Communication College, Chongqing 400035, China

Received 26 April 2010; Accepted 1 September 2010

Academic Editor: Teng Li

Copyright © 2011 C. L. Cao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The properties of the humidity sensors made of chemically treated and untreated multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) thin films are investigated systematically. It shows that both the chemically treated and untreated MWCNT thin films demonstrate humidity sensitive properties, but the former have stronger sensitivity than the latter. In the range of 11%–98% relative humidity (RH), the resistances of the chemically treated and untreated MWCNT humidity sensors increase 120% and 28%, respectively. Moreover, the treated humidity sensors showed higher sensitivity and better stability. In addition, the response and recover properties, and stabilization of the humidity sensors are measured, and the humidity sensitive mechanisms of the sensors are analyzed. The humidity sensitivity of carbon nanotube thin films indicates it promise as a kind of humidity sensitive material.

1. Introduction

Humidity sensors are widely applied in process control, environment monitoring, storage, electrical devices, and so forth, and the research to develop some new materials for sensor device attracts more and more attention. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) is a kind of carbon allotrope, which was found in 1991 by Iijima [1]. Owing to its very large surface area to volume ratio [2], nanoscale structure and hollow center, CNTs can absorb large amounts of foreign molecules on its surface [3]. With the presence of these molecules, many properties associated with CNTs would change. Due to these reasons nanotubes have been explored for many sensors [46]. Zahab et al. [7] reported that water vapor has a great effect on the electrical conductivity of a single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) mat, and p-type carbon nanotube would turn into n-type if water molecules added. It means that CNTs may be a kind of humidity sensing materials. Some studies of humidity sensitivity on SWCNTs have been reported [7, 8], and Varghese et al. [5], Valentini et al. [6], and Cantalini et al. [9] have investigated the gas sensitive characteristics of MWCNTs systematically and observed humidity sensitivity of MWCNTs briefly, and they have found that the humidity sensor impedance increases with increasing humidity [5, 6, 9]. But the humidity sensitive properties of MWCNTs have seldom been studied deeply and systematically.

Here we report the humidity sensing properties of both untreated and chemically treated MWCNT thin films systematically, including the sensitivity, the response and recover properties, and stabilization. The different properties of the two types of sensors are compared and the humidity sensing mechanisms of the sensors are discussed.

2. Experimental

In this experiment, carbon nanotubes were produced by hot filament chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [10] using C2H2 and Ni/Fe as the carbon source and catalyst, respectively. The obtained carbon nanotubes were characterized by the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

The CNTs used to prepare the humility sensors were classified into two types, untreated and chemically treated sample, respectively. In the chemical treatment process, MWCNTs were undergone a ultrasonic treatment for 150 minutes in a mixture of 98% sulphuric acid and 79% nitric acid in ratio of 3 : 1. The treated nanotubes were rinsed in deionized water and then let to dry. The thin films of humidity sensors are prepared by spraying on top of pre-deposited Au electrodes on quarts plate using an airbrush with untreated and chemically treated MWCNTs dispersed in ethanol, respectively. The dimensions of samples were 1 × 10-2 m in length, 5 × 10-3 m in width, and 1 × 10-4 m in thickness.

The electrical characteristic of the sensors were measured by a multifunctional digital multimeter (FLUKE-45 model, made in the US America) at variant humidity environments at constant temperature (20C). The sensors were successively put into several chambers with different RH levels obtained by saturation salt solution method. RH values varied from 11% to 98%. The uncertainty of the RH values is about ±1%. All samples were dried at 373 K for 30 minutes prior to electrical measurements. The measurement was done after 30 minutes when the temperatures inside and outside the chambers became the same.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure

Figures 1(a) and 1(b) show the SEM images of the pristine and the chemically treated carbon nanotubes. From the SEM images, the diameter of carbon nanotubes ranges from 40 to 60 nm. TEM image of the pristine carbon nanotubes is shown in the inset, indicating tube-like morphology. Before chemical treatment, carbon nanotubes are impure with some carbon particles, and some ends of the nanotubes are closed as is pointed by the arrow. However, after chemical treatment, the carbon nanotubes are more pure, and almost all the ends of the nanotube are open (marked in circles).

Figure 1: SEM images of pristine (a) and chemically treated (b) carbon nanotubes, and TEM image of carbon nanotubes (inset).
3.2. Humidity-Resistance Characteristic

Figures 2(a) and 2(b) give the D.C. resistance versus RH plots of untreated and treated MWCNT humidity sensors, respectively. The solid lines in the figures are measured in the humidification process (increasing RH), corresponding to the adsorption process, while the dashed lines are measured in the desiccation process (decreasing RH), corresponding to the desorption process. It shows that the resistance of both the untreated and treated samples changes almost linearly with the relative humidity. When RH increases from 11% to 98%, the resistance of the untreated and treated samples increases 28% and 120%, respectively, means, the treated samples have stronger sensitivity than the untreated.

Figure 2: Resistance versus RH characteristics of (a) untreated and (b) treated MWCNT humidity sensors.

The sensitivity factor 𝑆 can be defined as 𝑅𝑆=RH𝑅0𝑅0×100%,(1) where 𝑅RH and 𝑅0 are the resistance in the humidity state and 11% RH, respectively.

As shown in Figure 3, the sensitivity factor 𝑆 increases linearly with RH, and can be fitted linearly to (2) and (3) for the untreated and chemically treated MWCNTs humidity sensor, respectively, 𝑆=4.70+0.32RH,(2)𝑆=15.47+1.34RH.(3)

Figure 3: The sensitivity factor S of untreated and treated MWCNT humidity sensors.

It can be seen that the slope of chemically treated MWCNTs humidity sensor (1.34) is far greater than that of untreated MWCNTs humidity sensor (0.32), meaning that the sensitivity of the former is much higher than the latter. The higher sensitivity of the chemically treated sensor is attributed to its purity of nanotubes and higher surface sites available for the adsorption of water molecules resulting from its shorter length and more open ends.

However, a hysteresis of resistance versus RH in the desiccation process (Figure 2) is found in both chemically treated and untreated sensors. This is probably due to the different amount of water molecules adsorbed on CNTs between the humidification process and the desiccation process at a same ambient RH, causing the different resistance at a same RH.

3.3. Response and Recover Properties

Several important parameters for sensor devices are response time, recover time, and reproducibility. To investigate these properties, the dynamic testing of the untreated and chemically treated MWCNT sensors at a constant RH is performed. The response time for the absorption and desorption curves measured at 20C for the sensors is shown in Figure 4. The response time to continuous humidification from 33% to 98% RH is 20 and 50 s for the untreated and treated MWCNT sensors, respectively. While the recover time from 98% to 33% RH is 40 and 140 s for the treated and untreated MWCNT sensors, respectively. Further testing after three additional cycles demonstrates good reproducibility of the treated MWCNT sensors. The response and recovery time are much shorter than that of other sensors made of complex oxides, such as In-doped CaZrO3 [11] which works at high temperature (700C), Ba1-xLaxSnO3 (both 60 s) [12] and Sr added BaAl2O4 (120 S and 50 s) [13] and other materials [1416]. Therefore, the sensor made of the treated MWCNTs can be regarded as a fast response humidity sensor.

Figure 4: Dynamic response of untreated (a) and treated (b) MWCNT humidity sensors to humidity.

In case of humidity sensors, the recovery time is always higher than the response time [5, 9, 17], agreeing with our results. The long recover time can be attributed to slow desorption process of water molecules from CNTs at ambient temperature. As the usual response and recover time are tens and hundreds seconds, the quick response and recover property of the treated MWCNTs sensor has an advantage for practical applications.

3.4. Stabilization

The resistance variations with time for two kinds of samples are shown in Figure 5. The measurements were repeated at 20C, every 5 days for one month. Slight or little resistance variation have been observed in both untreated and treated samples at each humidity region for one month, indicating that both the treated and untreated MWCNTs sensors are relatively stable to exposure to water vapor in air.

Figure 5: Resistance variations with time for the sensors at various RH levels: untreated (a) and treated (b) MWCNT humidity sensor.
3.5. Humidity Sensing Mechanism

The origin of the humidity sensing effect in MWCNTs films may be caused by adsorption to water molecules. Before our experiment, the MWCNTs appear p-type semiconductor behavior tested by Hall effect experiment. For p-type MWCNTs, the adsorbed water molecules donate electrons to the valence band, thereby decreasing the number of holes and increasing the separation between the Fermi level and valence band [4, 7], and resulting in increase of the electrical resistance (see Figure 2). Although there is a humidity sensing effect to untreated MWCNTs, it is much weaker than that of treated MWCNTs. Chemical treatment makes carbon nanotubes shorten, more ends open, and more defects, which makes water molecules adsorb tubes easily. As MWCNTs could connect with lots of hydroxyl on its defects and open ends by chemical treatment, they could act as sites of adsorption to water molecules. Water molecules could be adsorbed on MWCNTs for the hydrogen in H2O molecule could form a weak bond with one of the surface C atoms. Pati et al. [8] reported that charge can transfer between the adsorbate and the CNTs. A quantitative analysis based on Mulliken approach shows a charge transfer of 0.03e- from the single H2O molecule to the CNTs [7]. The more water molecules can be adsorbed on the surface, intertubes, and ends after chemical treatment, the more charge transfer happens between the water molecules and CNTs. The presence of defects after chemical treatment may also reduce the conductivity of MWCNTs. Therefore, the humidity sensing characteristics of MWCNTs films is greatly enhanced after chemical treatment.

4. Conclusions

CNTs have been investigated as a new humidity sensitive material. The properties of the chemically treated CNT humidity sensors are discussed and compared with that of the untreated CNT sensors. The sensitivity of CNTs to humidity can be enhanced with chemical treatment. The charge transfer from absorbed water molecules to CNTs is a main reason for the humidity sensing properties. The treated CNT humidity sensor exhibited good sensitivity, linear and quick response, and excellent stability in different RH atmosphere, which demonstrate that it could be used as a good humidity sensor in practice applications.


This work has been funded by the NSFC (60976055), and Postgraduates’ Innovative Training Project (S-09109) of the 3rd-211 Project, and the large-scale equipment sharing fund of Chongqing University.


  1. S. Iijima, “Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon,” Nature, vol. 354, pp. 56–58, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Cinke, J. Li, B. Chen et al., “Pore structure of raw and purified HiPco single-walled carbon nanotubes,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 365, no. 1-2, pp. 69–74, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. K. W. Adu, G. U. Sumanasekera, B. K. Pradhan, H. E. Romero, and P. C. Eklund, “Carbon nanotubes: a thermoelectric nano-nose,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 337, no. 1–3, pp. 31–35, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Kong, N. R. Franklin, C. Zhou et al., “Nanotube molecular wires as chemical sensors,” Science, vol. 287, no. 5453, pp. 622–625, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. O. K. Varghese, P. D. Kichambre, D. Gong, K. G. Ong, E. C. Dickey, and C. A. Grimes, “Gas sensing characteristics of multi-wall carbon nanotubes,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 32–41, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Valentini, I. Armentano, J. M. Kenny, C. Cantalini, L. Lozzi, and S. Santucci, “Sensors for sub-ppm NO2 gas detection based on carbon nanotube thin films,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 961–963, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Zahab, L. Spina, P. Poncharal, and C. Marlière, “Water-vapor effect on the electrical conductivity of a single-walled carbon nanotube mat,” Physical Review B, vol. 62, no. 15, pp. 10000–10003, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Pati, Y. Zhang, S. K. Nayak, and P. M. Ajayan, “Effect of H2O adsorption on electron transport in a carbon nanotube,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 81, no. 14, pp. 2638–2640, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Cantalini, L. Valentini, I. Armentano, L. Lozzi, J. M. Kenny, and S. Santucci, “Sensitivity to NO2 and cross-sensitivity analysis to NH3, ethanol and humidity of carbon nanotubes thin film prepared by PECVD,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 95, no. 1–3, pp. 195–202, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. C. J. Lee, J. Park, S. Han, and J. Ihm, “Growth and field emission of carbon nanotubes on sodalime glass at 550C using thermal chemical vapor deposition,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 337, no. 4–6, pp. 398–402, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. M. H. Zhou and A. Ahamad, “Sol—gel processing of in-doped CaZrO3 solid electrolyte and the impedimetric sensing characteristics of humidity and hydrogen,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 129, pp. 205–209, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Upadhyay and P. Kavitha, “Lanthanum doped barium stannate for humidity sensor,” Materials Letters, vol. 61, no. 8-9, pp. 1912–1915, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. J. Vijaya, L. J. Kennedy, G. Sekaran, and K. S. Nagaraja, “Synthesis, characterization and humidity sensing properties of Sr(II)-added BaAl2O4 composites,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 542–548, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. Z. Zhang, C. Hu, Y. Xiong, R. Yang, and Z. L. Wang, “Synthesis of Ba-doped CeO2 nanowires and their application as humidity sensors,” Nanotechnology, vol. 18, no. 46, Article ID 465504, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. W. Yan, C. Hu, Y. Xi et al., “ZnSe nanorods prepared in hydroxide-melts and their application as a humidity sensor,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1205–1208, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. M. Zhang, C. Hu, H. Liu, Y. Xiong, and Z. Zhang, “A rapid-response humidity sensor based on BaNbO3 nanocrystals,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 128–132, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. Z.-H. Wu, W.-L. Wang, K.-J. Liao et al., “Study on the humidity sensitive behavior of multiwalled carbon nanotubes,” Chinese Physical Society, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 3462–3466, 2004. View at Google Scholar