Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 758429, 4 pages
Research Article

Synchrotron X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Study of Self-Assembled Nanoparticles Synthesized from Fe(acac)3 and Pt(acac)2

1Molecular Technology Research Unit, School of Science, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80161, Thailand
2School of Ceramic Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
3School of Physics, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology and Synchrotron Light Research Institute (Public Organization), Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand

Received 30 May 2011; Accepted 1 July 2011

Academic Editor: Linbao Luo

Copyright © 2012 K. Chokprasombat et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The synchrotron X-ray absorption technique was used to complement electron microscopy in the investigation of nanoparticles synthesized from the coreduction of iron acetylacetonate, Fe(acac)3 and platinum acetylacetonate, Pt(acac)2. A much higher Pt composition than Fe leads to an extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectrum for the sample that differs from that of fcc FePt nanoparticles. Most importantly, X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra clearly indicate the existence of α-Fe2O3 and Pt metal. Since these monodisperse nanoparticles have a diameter of around 4 nm and tend to self-assemble into hexagonal arrangements, they can be modeled as Pt-rich cores with an α-Fe2O3 shell stabilized by organic surfactants.

1. Introduction

Iron-platinum (FePt) nanoparticles are a prime candidate for the next generation of ultrahigh density recording materials [1]. Whereas other magnetic materials become hysteresis-free superparamagnetic particles when their sizes are below 10 nm, FePt nanoparticles of these sizes still exhibit ferromagnetism which is a requirement for nonvolatile recording [2]. To obtain substantial magnetic anisotropy for recording applications, not only the size but also the composition and local structure have to be controlled. It has been shown that as-synthesized FePt exhibits a chemically disordered fcc phase and is superparamagnetic but can be transformed into the ferromagnetic fct structure after heat treatment. In this fct arrangement, Fe and Pt atoms are in alternate planes with a balanced atomic ratio [3].

The synthesis of FePt nanoparticles conventionally uses the thermal decomposition of iron pentacarbonyl, Fe(CO)5 [3]. Since this starting material is very toxic, the coreduction of iron acetylacetonate, Fe(acac)3 and platinum acetylacetonate, Pt(acac)2 has been studied as a green alternative [47]. Metal acetylacetonates are universally regarded as versatile and nontoxic precursors in the synthesis of transition metal oxide nanoparticles [8]. However, the control of the composition and local structure of the FePt product from these starting materials still remain the subject of study. Commonly, the phase is identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The local composition can be obtained by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) whereas the global composition is averaged by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES).

In the case of the nanoparticles synthesized from the reaction between Fe(acac)3 and Pt(acac)2 and stabilized by organic surfactants, several possible core-shell structures may be obtained. The configuration gets more complicated when the ratio between Fe and Pt is highly unbalanced or a significant amount of oxygen is present. As a result, the conclusion about the local structure cannot be reached solely by using conventional characterization techniques. X-ray absorption spectroscopy offers a unique opportunity to shine light on local structures and complement the information on composition and phase. From X-ray absorption spectra, Shinoda et al. concluded that different synthetic conditions led to nanoparticles of varying structures including a Pt-rich FePt core with an Fe-rich amorphous shell [9]. Huang et al. studied the shift in absorption peaks as a function of thermal treatments [10] and copper additions [11]. In addition to X-ray absorption studies of FePt, Antoniak et al. demonstrated that the technique was also useful in the case of iron oxide [12]. Since we are interested in using X-ray absorption from a synchrotron radiation source to probe such nanoparticles, self-assembled nanoparticles from metal acetylacetonate precursors are used as the case study in this work. Similar studies could then be extended to other related structures including those iron oxide-coated Pt nanoparticles [13].

2. Experimental

2.1. General

Fe(acac)3 (99.99%), Pt(acac)2 (97%), oleic acid (90%), oleylamine (70%) were obtained from Fluka Chemical Company and used as received. Benzyl ether was degassed for 15 min before use. Other AR grade organic solvents used for purification (e.g., hexane and absolute ethanol) were used as purchased. All manipulations were performed under dry nitrogen (N2) using standard Schlenk line techniques.

2.2. Nanoparticles Preparation

A mixture of 0.5 mmoL Pt(acac)2 and 0.5 mmoL Fe(acac)3 was added in a 100 mL Schlenk flask filled with 20 mL benzyl ether. Oxygen was removed from the reaction flask in vacuo before being filled with N2. Once the solution reached 120°C, 5.0 mmoL oleic acid and 5.0 mmoL oleylamine as surfactants were added, and the solution was then heated to 210°C and kept at that temperature for 30 min. The black solution was refluxed at 300°C for 30 min then cooled to room temperature under N2. The particles were precipitated by addition of ethanol and then isolated by centrifugation. The obtained precipitate was redispersed in ethanol, followed by centrifugation. This washing procedure was repeated three times. Then, the washed particles were dispersed in hexane with a small amount (ca. 0.05 mL) of oleic acid and oleylamine, followed by bubbling with N2 to remove O2. The colloid was stored in glass bottles in a refrigerator at 4°C.

2.3. Characterization Methods

For characterization, samples were prepared by depositing the colloid on solid substrates and evaporating the solvent at room temperature. The morphology of the products was examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and the elemental composition was probed by EDS. X-ray absorption spectroscopy was obtained using synchrotron radiation at BL-8, Synchrotron Light Research Institute, Thailand. The X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) measurements of the Fe K-edge and Pt M5 -edge were performed in the transmission mode with an electron energy of 1.2 GeV. The spectra were collected at ambient temperature with a germanium(111) double crystal monochromator and recorded after performing an energy calibration. To increase the count rate, the ionization chamber was filled with argon gas. The storage ring was running at an energy of 1.22 GeV with electron currents between 140 mA and 80 mA.

3. Results and Discussion

The as-synthesized spherical nanoparticles in Figure 1 show a tendency to self-assemble into a hexagonal pattern. The higher magnification image in the inset reveals that these monodisperse particles have an approximate diameter of 4 nm and interparticle spacing is around 2 nm. This agrees to the observation by Nakaya et al. that such metal core dimensions and surfactants lead to a hexagonal assembly whereas larger nanoparticles (around 6 nm) tend to self-assemble into square patterns [5]. Elemental compositions of the colloid deposits by EDS analysis are 74.93% Pt, 8.24% Fe, and 16.83% O. Even though the molar ratio of Fe : Pt sources is 1 : 1 and a high boiling point solvent combines with high surfactants: metal ratio, Pt rich nanoparticles are still obtained rather than an ideal 1 : 1 stoichiometric FePt nanoparticles. This can be understood by the heterocoagulation model recently proposed by Beck et al. for the reaction between metal acetylacetonates [14]. In contrast to the binary nucleation model in which Fe-rich particles from the decomposition of Fe(CO)5 occur simultaneously with Pt-rich particles [3], Fe(acac)3 is harder to reduce than Pt(acac)2, and this leads to the intermediate products of Pt-rich nuclei with the deposition of iron oxide on their surface. These iron oxides are then reduced to Fe atoms by a CO-spillover process on surface of the Pt nuclei, and the Fe atoms diffuse into the Pt-rich nuclei at high temperatures. It follows that the reduction of iron oxides is more pronounced in the case of smaller Pt nuclei (larger surface area). The composition of nanoparticles from this mechanism is then sensitive to the reflux conditions as well as the amount of surfactants. Excessive amount of surfactants leads to particles of larger size but lowers the effectiveness of the reduction process. Moreover, the excess surfactants may impede the reduction process on the particle surface.

Figure 1: TEM images of synthesized nanoparticles.

Fourier transformation of the EXAFS spectrum of the Fe K-edge is shown in Figure 2. The highest peak between 0.1 and 0.2 nm corresponds to nearest neighboring Fe-O correlation which is different from the Fe-Pt profile shown in work reported by Shinoda et al. [9]. The Fe K-edge and Pt M5 -edge XANES spectra of the nanoparticles are shown in Figure 3. Between 21002–2200 eV in Figure 3(a), the profile fits well with that of the Pt standard, indicating that the sample contains Pt metal. In contrast, the XANES spectrum between 7000 and 7200 eV of the Fe K-edge does not match that of the Fe standard. Instead, as shown in Figure 3(b), it resembles that of hematite (α-Fe2O3) which is the most thermodynamically stable iron oxide at ambient conditions. XANES has the advantage of distinguishing the different valence states of Fe as is evident in this case because the different forms of iron oxide nanoparticles are difficult to differentiate by other techniques [12]. The results from X-ray absorption spectroscopy suggest that the sample contains mostly Pt metal and α-Fe2O3 with small amount of Fe metal. Since these nanoparticles have rather uniform size distribution and self-assembled arrangement, it is likely that Pt-rich cores with α-Fe2O3 shells are formed. This core-shell structure is surrounded by oleic acid and oleylamine. Although these surfactants are not detected by TEM or X-ray absorption spectroscopy, the model is confirmed by the stability of the nanoparticles in hexane without agglomeration and sedimentation over a long period of time.

Figure 2: Fourier transform of Fe K-edge EXAFS spectrum of nanoparticles.
Figure 3: XANES spectra of nanoparticles (Sample_S4) for (a) Pt M5 -edge compared to Pt foil and (b) Fe K-edge compared to Fe foil, FeO, and Fe2O3.

4. Conclusion

Self-assembled monodisperse nanoparticles were synthesized from the coreduction of Fe(acac)3 and Pt(acac)2 in the presence of benzyl ether and organic surfactants. With a composition of Fe lower than 10%, X-ray absorption spectra are consistent with a Pt-rich core with a α-Fe2O3 shell over an Fe-Pt alloy consistent with a heterocoagulation mechanism in a modified polyol process. It was demonstrated that the core shell can be modeled from the study by X-ray absorption spectroscopy and electron microscopy.


This project is financially supported by the National Electronics and Computer Technology Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency and Industry/University Cooperative Research Center (I/UCRC) in HDD Component, the Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University. Support from Seagate (Thailand) and the proof-reading by Dr. D. James Harding are gratefully acknowledged.


  1. B. D. Terris and T. Thomson, “Nanofabricated and self-assembled magnetic structures as data storage media,” Journal of Physics D, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. R199–R222, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. W. Zhang, Y. Liu, and S. H. Sun, “Synthesis and assembly of magnetic nanoparticles for information and energy storage applications,” Frontiers of Physics in China, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 347–356, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Sun, “Recent advances in chemical synthesis, self-assembly, and applications of FePt nanoparticles,” Advanced Materials, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 393–403, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. V. Nandwana, K. E. Elkins, and J. P. Liu, “Magnetic hardening in ultrafine FePt nanoparticle assembled films,” Nanotechnology, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 2823–2826, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Nakaya, M. Kanehara, and T. Teranishi, “One-pot synthesis of large FePt nanoparticles from metal salts and their thermal stability,” Langmuir, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 3485–3487, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Liu, X. Wu, T. Klemmer et al., “Polyol process synthesis of monodispersed FePt nanoparticles,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 20, pp. 6121–6123, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. E. Elkins, T. S. Vedantam, J. P. Liu et al., “Ultrafine FePt nanoparticles prepared by the chemical reduction method,” Nano Letters, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1647–1649, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. L. Willis, Z. Y. Chen, J. Q. He, Y. M. Zhu, N. J. Turro, and S. O'Brien, “Metal acetylacetonates as general precursors for the synthesis of early transition metal oxide nanomaterials,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2011, Article ID 525967, 5 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. K. Shinoda, K. Sato, B. Jeyadevan, K. Tohji, and S. Suzuki, “Local structural studies of directly synthesized L10 FePt nanoparticles by using XRD, XAS and ASAXS,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 310, no. 2, pp. 2387–2389, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. W. Huang, Y. H. Huang, T. H. Tu, and C. H. Lee, “X-ray diffraction and absorption spectroscopy studies of the structure of self-assembled FePt nanoparticles during annealing,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 282, no. SI, pp. 127–130, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  11. T. W. Huang, T. H. Tu, Y. H. Huang, C. H. Lee, and C. M. Lin, “X-ray scattering and absorption spectroscopy study of the order-disorder transition of (FePt)1xCux nanoparticles,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 941–943, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Antoniak, A. Warland, M. Darbandi et al., “X-ray absorption measurements on nanoparticle systems: self-assembled arrays and dispersions,” Journal of Physics D, vol. 43, no. 47, Article ID 474007, 8 pages, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  13. H. He and C. Gao, “Synthesis of Fe3O3/Pt nanoparticles decorated carbon nanotubes and their use as magnetically recyclable catalysts,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2011, Article ID 193510, 10 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. W. Beck Jr., C. G. S. Souza, T. L. Silva, M. Jafelicci Jr., and L. C. Varanda, “Formation mechanism via a heterocoagulation approach of FePt nanoparticles using the modified polyol process,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 115, no. 21, pp. 10475–10482, 2011. View at Google Scholar