Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2012, Article ID 950793, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/950793
Research Article

Study of Structural and Optical Properties of Zinc Oxide Rods Grown on Glasses by Chemical Spray Pyrolysis

1Physics Department, Education Faculty, University of Atatűrk, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey
2Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department, University of Atatűrk, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey

Received 29 March 2011; Accepted 11 April 2011

Academic Editor: Ting Zhu

Copyright © 2012 Erdal Sonmez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We have investigated morphological and optical properties of zinc oxide rods. Highly structured ZnO layers comprising with well-shaped hexagonal rods were prepared by spray pyrolysis deposition of zinc chloride aqueous solutions at ~550C. The rods were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, photoluminescence, and ultraviolet and visible absorption spectroscopy measurements. The deposition of the 0.1 mol/L solution at ~550C resulted in crystals with a diameter of 400–1000 nm and length of 500–2000 nm. Sharp near-band edge emission peaks, centered at 3844 and 3680 Å, dominated the PL spectra of ZnO at 300 K and 6.2 K, respectively. In addition to this, absorption coefficient was determined by absorption measurement. X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy, results suggest that ZnO rods, prepared by spray pyrolysis, have high crystalline quality. This is desirable in nanotechnology applications.

1. Introduction

Zinc oxide (ZnO) is a commercially important material utilized in paints, rubber, catalysts, sensors, varistors, and so forth. ZnO exhibits semiconducting, piezoelectric, and pyroelectric properties [1, 2]. Nanostructured ZnO has a potential for application in nanotechnology [3, 4]. Structural, morphological, optical, and electrical properties of ZnO can be changed drastically by its doping with various metal cations [5]. Furthermore, ZnO thin films have recently been studied as an active channel material in thin film transistors [6, 7]. Chemically, ZnO is a simple compound; morphologically, however, this material is very rich in terms of the geometry of its particles. Many researchers focused on the investigation of the relationship between the synthesis route of ZnO on one side, due to their large exciton binding energy of ~60 meV at room temperature [813]. ZnO particles were largely prepared by using “wet” chemistry or pyrolysis, whereas the vacuum techniques prevailed in making thin ZnO films. The starting zinc compound, chemical composition of solvent, nature of the precipitating agent, pH, temperature, and time of aging influence the size and geometrical shape of ZnO particles [14].

In the past years, the ZnO micro/nanostructures with different shapes were synthesized by various approaches reported by many research groups. These methods include chemical vapor transport and condensation [15, 16], thermal evaporation [17], metal organic chemical vapor deposition [18], hydrothermal method [19], sol-gel method [20, 21], electrochemical deposition [22, 23], ion beam-assisted deposition [24], laser ablation [25], and sputter deposition [26].

In this study, ZnO rods were prepared by chemical spray pyrolysis technique. The spray pyrolysis is an attractive method to obtain thin films, since it has been proved to be a simple and inexpensive method and it is particularly useful for large area of nanotechnology applications. In addition, chemical spray pyrolysis has the advantage over the other methods in that it does not consume much time and is a cost-effective, catalyst, and template-free method to prepare ZnO nanostructures. Here, we report the direct growth of zinc oxide rods on glass substrate [2730] by a chemical spray pyrolysis method. We have also studied the structural, morphological, and optical properties of the films with the aim of understanding physical properties of the obtained ZnO rods.

2. Experimental

ZnO rods were grown by a chemical spray pyrolysis technique. The spray solution was prepared dissolving ZnCl2 (2.7256 g) in 200 mL distilled water. The initial pH value of solution was measured as 6. The starting solution was atomized at a frequency of 1.63 MHz by an ultrasonic nebulizer and by using dry air. The solution was mixed with magnetic mixer. Mixing process lasted for 30 min. The nozzle-substrate distance was maintained at 10 cm with 45 degree, and the substrate temperature was fixed at ~550°C by TET-612 temperature controller device on the metallic hot plate surface, because a flat ZnO film evolves into the the structured layer consisting of single-crystalline hexagonal elongated prims at growth temperatures close to ~500°C and above [27]. The temperature of the metallic plate surface was totally stable. The substrates are normal microscope glasses which were cut with the dimensions of 10 × 10 × 1 mm. Before loading into the system, the substrates were washed with detergent and then completely rinsed in methanol, acetone, and deionized water, respectively, and dried in air. Then, the substrates were progressively heated up to the required temperature, before being sprayed on. At this temperature, it was observed that the glass substrate became soft. The 5-6 μm diameter droplets were carried onto heated glass substrates. The flow rate of air used as a carrier gas was 2 mL/min. The duration of the film deposition was about 100 min. The colour of ZnO film was white, and it had very good adhesion to glass substrates. The structural characterization of the films was carried out by X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements using a Rigaku D/Max-IIIC diffractometer with CuKα1 radiation ( 𝜆 = 1 . 5 4 1 8  Å), at 30 kV, 10 mA. Surface morphology was examined by a JEOL JSM5610 model scanning electron microscope operating at 24 kV. The diameter and length of the rods were measured by a scanning electron microscope (SEM). In addition, morphology was also determined by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The optical characterization of the films was carried out by photoluminescence (PL) with an He-Cd ion laser as a light source using an excitation wavelength of 325 nm. So absorption coefficient was determined by UV-VIS absorption (UV) spectroscopy measurement.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. Structural Properties

XRD patterns of the grown ZnO samples are shown in Figure 1. The diffraction pattern of grown sample shows a peak corresponding to (002) plane-reflection together with highly diminished peaks corresponding to other planes of wurtzite ZnO structure. The high intensity of (002) plane as compared with other planes clearly suggests the preferential growth of rods along the 𝑐 -axis direction. The XRD pattern shows increase in the intensities of peaks due to reflections from all crystallographic planes of (100), (002), (101), (102), and (110) of wurtzite ZnO structure with predominant counts for (002) plane.

Figure 1: XRD pattern of ZnO rods deposited on glass substrate.

Taking SEM and AFM into consideration, we see that ZnO structures are spreading uniformly onto the sample surface, and vertically increasing from the axis c in Figures 2 and 3. The length of the ZnO rods is between 500 and 2000 nm, and the diameter changes between 400 and 1000 nm. The diameter and length of the ZnO rods acquired by SEM were confirmed by graphs acquired by means of AFM. These cross-section graphics are important that the same length or diameter is achieved on the plane sample. AFM results are in compliance with the SEM investigation. Additionally, the reason of the sunflower-like structures in the SEM pictures is unknown, but we thought that the reason of these structures may be related to the temperature gradient on the glass substrates (Figure 2(b)).

Figure 2: SEM images of ZnO rods. (a) Hexagonal ZnO nanorods. (b) The result from temperature gradient-dependent structure deformation.
Figure 3: AFM image and cross-section graphic of the ZnO rods.
3.2. Optical Properties

Figure 4(a) was acquired from the room temperature PL spectra of the synthesized ZnO rods. Two peaks are observed in this figure: exciton peak in the left side and donor-acceptor peak in the right side. Figure 4(b) was acquired from the cryogenic PL spectra. Two peaks are observed in the spectrum at 6.2 K: one is a strong, dominated, and high-intensity peak at 3680 Å in the UV region; the other is a suppressed and week band at 5500 Å in the visible region.

Figure 4: PL spectra of ZnO rods at (a) 300 K and (b) 6.2 K.

The UV emission is also called as near-band edge emission and originated by the recombination of the free excitons. The green band in the visible region, known as deep level emission, is generally explained by the radiative recombination of the photo-generated hole with the electrons which belong to ionized oxygen vacancies [31]. In our case, the UV emission is dominated over the green level emission. The weak peak is a result of donor acceptor pairs (DAPs) which can cause emission at room temperature. These DAPs are made up of dislocations or impurity in crystal. In general, the UV peak at room temperature is attributed to near band-edge (NBE) free exciton transition from the localized level below the conduction band to the valance band [32]. The emissions which are produced by DAP are decreasing by the temperature decrease because activity is decreasing by the temperature. The sharply peak is made up of exciton doublets which are not decomposed at the room temperature. According to PL data which is obtained in 6.2 K, the sharp peaks’ duration increases at temperature decrease, so peak intensity increases and slides to the left side because decrement of temperature widens the band gap. The other peak seems like decreasing because of the increase of sharp peaks’ intensity. It has been reported that the improvement in the crystal quality such as low structural defects, oxygen vacancies, zinc interstitials, and decrease in the impurities may cause the appearance of a sharp and strong UV emission and a suppressed and weak green emission [33]. So the presence of a strong UV emission and a weak green emission from the synthesized ZnO rods indicated that the grown structures have good crystal quality with less structural defects [34]. The absorption coefficient is one of the intrinsic parameters of the ZnO rods that was determined by fitting the absorption spectrum with an appropriate Beer-Lambert Law. The thickness of the ZnO rods was verified by the cross-section graphic of the AFM (Figure 3) and SEM images (Figure 2). The value of the energy and absorption coefficient calculation was carried out for the ZnO rods. It was found that the value of the energy is 3.35 eV and the absorption coefficient is 145125 cm-1 for the largest peak.

4. Conclusion

In this study, the ZnO rods on glass substrate were obtained by the ultrasonic spray pyrolysis method. The microstructures of ZnO rods were characterized by SEM, AFM images, and XRD patterns. Optical properties were obtained by PL spectrometer and UV-Vis measurements. Sharp near-band edge (NBE) emission peaks centered at 3844 and 3680 Å dominated the PL spectra of ZnO at 300 K and 6.2 K, respectively. In addition, structural analysis showed that the rods are 𝑐 -axis-orientated ZnO wurzite crystals. The ZnO rods produced at optimum substrate temperature of ~550°C exhibited single phase of ZnO with preferred (002) orientation. Diameter and length of size ZnO rods were 500–2000 and 400 2000 nm, respectively. It was found that ZnO rods with good structural and morphological properties can be produced on glass. These results indicate that spray pyrolysis methods are a viable technique for producing high-quality ZnO rods for optical devices. At the same time, it is important to discuss the implementation of the presented results in this study for optoelectronic applications. The main issue in nanotechnology is to get devices in small size. The present work will contribute to the understanding of related photoluminescence, optical, structural, and morphological properties of ZnO nanomaterials.

References

  1. Z. L. Wang, “Nanostructures of zinc oxide,” Materials Today, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 26–33, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. N. Tamaekong, C. Liewhiran, A. Wisitsoraat, and S. Phanichphant, “Flame-spray-made undoped zinc oxide films for gas sensing applications,” Sensors, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 7863–7873, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  3. Y. H. Heo, D. P. Norton, L. C. Tien et al., “Low temperature (<100C) patterned growth of ZnO nanorod arrays on Si,” Materials Science and Engineering R-Reports, vol. 47, no. 1-2, pp. 1–47, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. J. Height, L. Madler, S. E. Pratsinis, and F. Krumeich, “Nanorods of ZnO made by flame spray pyrolysis,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 572–578, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. P. Norton, Y. W. Heo, M. P. Ivill et al., “ZnO: growth, doping & processing,” Materials Today, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 34–40, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Fortunato, P. Barquinha, A. Pimentel et al., “Recent advances in ZnO transparent thin film transistors,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 487, no. 1-2, pp. 205–211, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. E. Fortunato, P. Barquinha, A. Pimentel et al., “Fully transparent ZnO thin-film transistor produced at room temperature,” Advanced Materials, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 590–594, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Choopun, R. D. Vispute, W. Noch et al., “Oxygen pressure-tuned epitaxy and optoelectronic properties of laser-deposited ZnO films on sapphire,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 75, no. 25, pp. 3947–3949, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y. Li, G. W. Meng, L. D. Zhang, and F. Phillipp, “Ordered semiconductor ZnO nanowire arrays and their photoluminescence properties,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, no. 15, pp. 2011–2014, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Guo, S. Yang, C. Yang et al., “Highly monodisperse polymer-capped ZnO nanoparticles: preparation and optical properties,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, no. 20, pp. 2901–2903, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Wu, C. Xie, H. Xia, J. Hu, and A. Wang, “The thermal physical formation of ZnO nanoparticles and their morphology,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 217, no. 3, pp. 274–280, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Lia, X. L. Chen, H. Li, M. He, and Z. Y. Qiao, “Fabrication of zinc oxide nanorods,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 233, no. 1-2, pp. 5–7, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. K. Meyer, H. Alves, D. M. Hofmann et al., “Bound excition and donor-acceptor pair recombination ZnO,” Physica Status Solidi B, vol. 241, no. 2, pp. 231–260, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Music, A. Saric, and S. Popovic, “Dependence of the microstructural properties of ZnO particles on their synthesis,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 448, no. 1-2, pp. 277–283, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. Keis, E. Magnusson, H. Lindstrom, S. E. Lindquist, and A. Hagfeldt, “A 5% efficient photoelectrochemical solar cell based on nanostructured ZnO electrodes,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. Voss, “Condensed-matter physics: switch-hitter materials tantalize theorists,” Science, vol. 292, no. 5524, pp. 1987–1990, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  17. M. H. Huang, Y. Wu, H. Feick, N. Tran, E. Weber, and P. Yang, “Catalytic growth of zinc oxide nanowires by vapor transport,” Advanced Materials, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 113–116, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. Lee, M. C. Jeong, and J. M. Myoung, “Catalyst-free growth of ZnO nanowires by metal-organic chemical vapour deposition (MOCVD) and thermal evaporation,” Acta Materialia, vol. 52, no. 13, pp. 3949–3957, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Z. R. Dai, Z. W. Pan, and Z. L. Wang, “Novel nanostructures of functional oxides synthesized by thermal evaporation,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 9–24, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L. E. Greene, M. Law, J. Goldberger et al., “Low-temperature wafer-scale production of ZnO nanowire arrays,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 42, no. 26, pp. 3031–3034, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  21. S. E. Ahn, J. S. Lee, H. Kim et al., “Photoresponse of sol-gel-synthesized ZnO nanorods,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 84, no. 975, pp. 5022–5024, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y. C. Wang and M. H. Hon, “Preparation of nanosized ZnO arrays by electrophoretic deposition,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. C53–C55, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. J. Zheng, “Fabrication and optical properties of large-scale uniform zinc oxide nanowire arrays by one-step electrochemical deposition technique,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 363, no. 1-2, pp. 123–128, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. W. Li, D. S. Mao, Z. H. Zheng et al., “ZnO/Zn phosphor thin films prepared by IBED,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 128-129, no. 1, pp. 346–350, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. Sun, G. M. Fuge, and M. N. R. Ashfold, “ZnO/Zn phosphor thin films prepared by IBED,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 396, no. 1–3, pp. 21–26, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  26. W. Chiou, W. Wu, and J. Ting, “Growth of single crystal ZnO nanowires using sputter deposition,” Diamond and Related Materials, vol. 12, no. 10-11, pp. 1841–1844, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. U. Alver, T. Kilinc, E. Bacaksiz et al., “Synthesis and characterization of spray pyrolysis Zinc Oxide microrods,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 515, no. 7-8, pp. 3448–3451, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. V. V. Kireev, L. N. Dem'yanets, L. E. Li, and V. V. Artemov, “Growth of thin ZnO films by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis,” Inorganic Materials, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 154–162, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Khoury, R. al Asmar, M. Abdallah, G. El Hajj Moussa, and A. Foucaran, “Comparative study between zinc oxide elaborated by spray pyrolysis, electron beam evaporation and rf magnetron techniques,” Physica Status Solidi A, vol. 207, no. 8, pp. 1900–1904, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  30. Z. L. Wang, “Zinc oxide nanostructures: growth, properties and applications,” Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, vol. 16, no. 16, pp. R829–R858, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. Vanheusden, C. H. Seager, W. L. Warren, D. R. Tallant, and J. A. Voigt, “Mechanisms behind green photoluminescence in ZnO phosphor powders,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 79, no. 10, pp. 7983–7990, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. Cho, J. Ma, Y. Kim, Y. Sun, G. K. L. Wong, and J. B. Ketterson, “Photoluminescence and ultraviolet lasing of polycrystalline ZnO thin films prepared by the oxidation of the metallic Zn,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 75, no. 18, pp. 2761–2763, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. M. Bagnall, Y. F. Chen, Z. Zhu, T. Yao, M. Y. Shen, and T. Goto, “High temperature excitonic stimulated emission from ZnO epitaxial layers,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 73, no. 8, pp. 1038–1042, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. Umar, S. H. Kim, Y.-S. Lee, K. S. Nahm, and Y. B. Hahn, “Catalyst-free large-quantity synthesis of ZnO nanorods by a vapor-solid growth mechanism: structural and optical properties,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 282, no. 1-2, pp. 131–136, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus