Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 193725 | 9 pages |

Investigating the Formation Process of Sn-Based Lead-Free Nanoparticles with a Chemical Reduction Method

Academic Editor: Xuedong Bai
Received22 Oct 2012
Revised15 Jan 2013
Accepted29 Jan 2013
Published26 Feb 2013


Nanoparticles of a promising lead-free solder alloy (Sn3.5Ag (wt.%, SnAg) and Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu (wt.%, SAC)) were synthesized through a chemical reduction method by using anhydrous ethanol and 1,10-phenanthroline as the solvent and surfactant, respectively. To illustrate the formation process of Sn-Ag alloy based nanoparticles during the reaction, X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to investigate the phases of the samples in relation to the reaction time. Different nucleation and growth mechanisms were compared on the formation process of the synthesized nanoparticles. The XRD results revealed different reaction process compared with other researchers. There were many contributing factors to the difference in the examples found in the literature, with the main focus on the formation mechanism of crystal nuclei, the solubility and ionizability of metal salts in the solvent, the solid solubility of Cu in Ag nuclei, and the role of surfactant on the growth process. This study will help define the parameters necessary for the control of both the composition and size of the nanoparticles.

1. Introduction

Interconnect (solder-based) materials are of great importance in the field of electronics and manufacturing, and the most widely used solder is an Sn-Pb-based alloy. However, the very nature of the levels of toxicity with lead in this system has been a persistent issue and is, therefore, being phased out in the electronic industry gradually. The development of viable alternatives has focused on many alloy-based systems, such as Sn-Cu [1], Sn-Ag [2], Sn-Zn [3], Sn-Bi [4], and Sn-In [5]. To improve the properties of these binary alloy solders, a third element can be introduced. A Sn-Ag-Cu system [6] was developed to investigate this potential.

The most promising candidates for Sn-Pb solders are Sn-Ag-based alloys, with benefits extending towards the solderability, mechanical properties, and the reliability [7]. There are, however, some disadvantages in this system. One of them is the higher melting temperature than that of Sn-Pb solder, which may cause some damages during the soldering process. To solve this problem, the size-dependent melting temperature of the pure melt and alloy has been studied [813]. These works show that the nanoparticles melt at a lower temperature than the corresponding bulk ones. Thus, the preparation of nanoparticles is extremely important.

Many methods have been developed to manufacture nanoparticles [1417]. Among them, the chemical reduction method is widely used in the production of nanoparticles of lead-free solder [1820]. There has been a significant focus on the physical properties of products. However, little work has been done on the formation process of the nanoparticles of Sn-Ag during the reaction process. The nucleation and growth mechanism are still not fully understood. Hsiao and Duh studied this issue in the synthesis process of Sn3.5Ag0.5Cu nanoparticles in aqueous solution [21]. However, their explanations about the disappearance of Cu in the XRD pattern are still speculative.

In this paper, nanoparticles of two promising lead-free solders, the Sn3.5Ag (wt.%) alloy and the Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu (wt.%) alloy, were synthesized through a chemical reduction method. We studied the formation process of nanoparticles in an anhydrous ethanol solution during the reaction. Many experimental parameters were considered to help explain the differences in the XRD patterns found in the literature.

2. Experimental

The materials used to synthesize Sn3.5Ag nanoparticles were tin(II) 2-ethylhexanoate (C16H30O4Sn) and silver nitrate (AgNO3). 1,10-phenanthroline (C12H8N2·H2O), sodium borohydride (NaBH4), and anhydrous ethanol (CH3CH2OH) were selected as the surfactant, reducing agent, and solvent, respectively. In terms of the synthesis of Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu (SAC) nanoparticles, copper (II) ethoxide monohydrate (Cu(OC2H5)2·H2O) was added to the reactant.

In a typical synthesis of Sn3.5Ag nanoparticles, 0.2998 g of tin (II) 2-ethylhexanoate, 0.0051 g of silver nitrate, and 0.2775 g of 1,10-phenanthroline were mixed with 60 mL of anhydrous ethanol to prepare the precursor solution. The mixture was stirred for about 2 hours before 0.1892 g of sodium borohydride was added into the stirring solution. The reaction time was the variable to be tested in the experimental procedure, so set reaction times of 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, and 60 min were used. The as-synthesized nanoparticles were precipitated by a centrifuge at a rate of 4000 rpm for 45 min. Due to the low solubility of NaBH4 in ethanol [22], the reaction rate during the separation process was extremely low. The reduction reaction could be stopped at any predetermined time through this method. The nanoparticles obtained were rinsed 3 times with anhydrous ethanol and then dried in the vacuum chamber at 40°C for 8 hours. The synthesis procedure of Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu nanoparticles was similar to that of Sn3.5Ag nanoparticles.

The synthesis parameters of these two lead-free nanoparticles with different reaction times were listed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

SampleC16H30O4Sn (g)AgNO3 (g)CH3CH2OH (mL)C12H8N2 H2O (g)NaBH4 (g)Reaction time (min)

SnAg40.29980.0051600.27750.1892 g60

Reaction time


The crystal structure of the synthesized SnAg alloy nanoparticles was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), from 20° to 90° (2θ), using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154056 nm) on a Rigaku D/Max-2550 X-ray diffractometer. The electron accelerating voltage and accelerating current used in the detection process were 40 kV and 200 mA, respectively.

The SAC particle samples were measured on a Rigaku D/Max-2200 X-ray diffractometer from 20° to 90° (2θ). The wavelength of the X-ray from the Cu Kα radiation was 0.154056 nm. The electron accelerating voltage and accelerating current used in the detection process were 40 kV and 40 mA, respectively. The surface features of the synthesized particles were studied by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, model JSM-6700F).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Formation Process of SnAg Nanoparticles

Figure 1 shows the XRD results of the synthesized SnAg nanoparticles. There were two clear phases, the β-Sn and Ag3Sn, indicating the successful alloying of Sn and Ag during the synthesis process. This was further confirmed through their crystal structures by high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) [23]. The relative intensity of the diffraction peaks of β-Sn increased with the reaction time, while the Ag3Sn phase showed the opposite trend.

The relative intensity of the three strong peaks from the Ag3Sn phase, obtained from the XRD pattern, was shown in Figure 2. It was obvious that the relative intensity of the strongest peak declined from 100% to 10%. A similar trend could be found in the other two strong peaks. It tended towards stability when the reaction time increased from 40 min to 60 min.

The relative intensity of the diffraction peak of the Ag3Sn phase indicted the formation process of the two phases. When the reaction time was 15 min, the relative intensity of the diffraction peak of the Ag3Sn phase was at the maximum. At the same time, the diffraction peak of β-Sn phase could also be found, as shown in Figure 1(a). This implied that the product was mainly in the Ag3Sn phase. When the reaction time increased to 30 min, the relative intensity of the diffraction peak of Ag3Sn phase in the synthesized nanoparticles decreased dramatically, as shown in Figure 2. The maximum relative intensity corresponds to the main peak of the β-Sn phase, and therefore, the amount of the β-Sn phase increased in the product. The result was the same for the nanoparticles obtained when the reaction time was further increased to 45 min. The reaction was near completion when the reaction time was set to 60 min and the main phase changed to β-Sn with the relative amount of the Ag3Sn phase decreasing to a very low level, which could be derived from Figures 1 and 2.

Hsiao and Duh [21] had studied the formation process of Sn3.5Ag0.5Cu alloy nanoparticles by means of a chemical reduction method in aqueous solution. The precursor was made by mixing SnSO4, AgNO3, and Cu(NO3)·2.5H2O together in the solvent. The reducing agent (NaBH4/NaOH) was added to the precursor and the products and reaction times were investigated. In their work, the formation process of Sn3.5Ag0.5Cu nanoparticles was divided into stages. Firstly, the Ag-Cu nuclei formed in the solution before being transformed to (Ag, Cu)4Sn by adsorbing tin atoms. The second stage involved the growth of the (Ag, Cu)4Sn nanoparticles. It was noted that (Ag, Cu)3Sn formed when the tin atoms in the (Ag, Cu)4Sn phase exceeded the maximum amount.

Another change from the reported literature procedure was the use of anhydrous ethanol as the solvent in our experiment. There were Sn2+ and Ag+ ions in the aqueous solution, and due to the different standard reduction potential of Sn2+/Sn4+ (0.151 V versus the standard hydrogen electrode, SHE) and Ag+/Ag (0.8 V versus SHE), the following reaction would occur [24]

The (Ag, Cu)4Sn phase could be generated without the addition of a reducing agent in reference [21]. However, the origin of Ag atoms was not specified. Using (1), it can be seen that the silver atoms came from two reaction mechanisms at the first stage. Both and NaBH4 could reduce .

If the solvent was changed to anhydrous ethanol, which was studied in the present work, the solubility of AgNO3 would be low [25, 26]. Although AgNO3 could be ionized in ethanol [27, 28], the amount was possibly small due to the difference of molecular polarity between solvent and solute. The reaction in (1) did not take place, which could be confirmed by the experimental phenomena that no change occurred during the preparation process of metal precursor.

When the reducing agent NaBH4 was added into the precursor, black particles precipitated rapidly. In the homogeneous metal ion solutions, electron transfer from NaBH4 to the metal ions occurred during the redox reaction [29, 30]; thus the metal ions turned into atoms. This process could be described as follows [31]

The transition of electrons from the reducing agent to the metal ions was determined by their standard redox potentials. The reduction rate of cations increased with the standard redox potentials increase [32]. The standard redox potential of Ag/Ag+ and Sn/Sn2+ was 0.8 V (versus SHE) [24, 33] and 0.14 V (versus SHE) [34], respectively. The principles were

It could be seen that the standard redox potential of Ag/Ag+ was much higher than that of Sn/Sn2+. Thus, the oxidizing ability of Ag+ was larger compared with Sn2+. It was the same for their reduction rate in the reaction system, which was consistent with the XRD results. Therefore, the formation process of Sn3.5Ag nanoparticles in this work could be summarized.

Before the addition of reducing agent, the metal salts were dissolved homogeneously by stirring for 2 hours in anhydrous ethanol. The potential for ionization was relatively low as the polarity was different from that of solvent.

When the reducing agent was added and mixed into the precursor, black particles precipitated immediately. At this stage, most of the Ag+ ions were reduced by NaBH4. Only a few Sn2+ ions were reduced owing to the relatively lower oxidization potential and reduction rate. Silver atoms and tin atoms derived from the redox reaction formed the intermetallic compound (Ag3Sn) through the mechanical stirring. Because of the low silver content, some of the tin atoms did not combine with silver atoms and formed the β-Sn phase.

The reduction of Sn2+ ions continued till the completion of the reaction until the Sn3.5Ag alloy nanoparticles were obtained.

3.2. Formation Process of the Primary Nanoparticles of the SnAgCu Alloy System

The influence of Cu added to the SnAg alloy for the formation process of nanoparticles was studied in this section. Different reaction times were chosen, as shown in Table 2, and the corresponding XRD results were shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3 indicated that the products formed in the initial 15 min were mainly Ag3Sn, Cu6Sn5, and β-Sn. Only 5 diffraction peaks of β-Sn emerged in this sample. Sn2+ ions in the solution were not sufficiently reduced at this reaction stage. After 30 minutes of reaction, the XRD pattern of the SAC2 sample showed no obvious difference with that of SAC1, except for the change in the maximum relative intensity of the β-Sn phase from (200) to (101). When the reaction duration was set to 45 min, the diffraction peaks of β-Sn emerged, as shown in Figure 3(c). The relative intensity of the diffraction peaks of Ag3Sn and Cu6Sn5 decreased further. There was no significant change in the XRD patterns between SAC4, with a reaction time of 60 min, and SAC3.

As for the Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu alloy, the standard redox potential of Ag/Ag+, Cu/Cu2+ and Sn/Sn2+, was 0.8 V (versus SHE) [24, 33], 0.339 V (versus SHE) [35, 36], and −0.14 V (versus SHE) [34], respectively. So, the oxidizing abilities of the metal cations in order were Ag+, Cu2+, and Sn2+. The reduction reaction of Cu2+ followed (6), and Cu atom formed through the electrons transmission from the reducing agent to the Cu cation

It was thought that the Ag-Cu nuclei formed because the standard redox potentials of these two species were similar. The Sn atoms reduced in the solution adsorbed on the surface of Ag-Cu nuclei, which acted as the core, and formed a shell through the diffusion mechanism. The omission of Cu in the XRD pattern was explained through crystallography, which showed that the Cu atoms dissolved in the Ag matrix and formed a solid in solution.

In order to understand the origin of the difference, the synthesis conditions and the mechanism of nucleation and growth were considered. Firstly, the solubility and ionizability of the reactant AgNO3 in anhydrous ethanol solution were much smaller than those of aqueous solution [2427], and that would lead to the relatively low reaction rate (the relative intensity of the XRD pattern of Sn phase was strong enough when the reaction time was 10 seconds [21], compared with that in this paper), so the metal cations could be reduced to atoms at a relatively slow rate, compared with that in aqueous solution. Secondly, Ag and Cu in their metallic form could form nuclei separately in the initial stage of the reaction. There were three main nucleation or growth mechanisms in the colloidal system. The classic Lamer mechanism [37] proposed the idea that fast nucleation and slow growth took place in the supersaturated solution. The growth process was controlled by diffusion. However, this mechanism was considered to be suitable to the sulfur sols and other analogous systems [38]. The Finke mechanism [38], which was reasonable for the unsaturated solutions, showed that nanoparticle formation was dominated by low, continuous nucleation and fast, autocatalytic surface growth. The last growth mechanism was described as the seeded growth [39]. The seeds, which act as the nuclei for the growth process, could be either the same or different composition as the absorbed atoms. This growth mechanism was used to fabricate the core-shell structures in the bimetallic alloy system [40]. In the case of the present work, when the reducing agent was added into the precursor solution, the nucleation and growth process of intermetallic compound nanoparticles could be described by the Finke mechanism.

Luo et al. synthesized ZnPd nanoparticles through a chemical reduction method and found that the coreduction of Zn2+ and Pd2+ could happen when the reducing agent was in excess [41]. The conditions were similar in this work, and the metal cations (Ag+, Cu2+, and Sn2+) with different reduction potentials could be reduced simultaneously. Meanwhile, the reduction rate of Ag+ and Cu2+ was faster than that of Sn2+ due to their reduction potentials [32]. There were more Ag and Cu atoms than Sn atoms in the solution at the initial reaction stage, and as a result of this, the coreduction of intermetallic compounds, that is, Ag3Sn and Cu6Sn5, could take place. Due to the relatively low content of Ag and Cu, the Sn in the solution was not consumed in the formation process of the intermetallic phase, and the Sn phase in the XRD was made up of these Sn atoms. The growth of the formed Sn nuclei might combine the autocatalytic surface growth mechanism and homogeneous seeded growth mechanism.

In addition, the surfactant used in our experiment, which was different from that used in literature, may play an important role in the detection of Cu. The capping effect of 1,10-phenanthroline on the formation of metal nanoparticles has already been well documented [4253]. The passivation layer could effectively prevent the growth of the primary particles or the formation of the secondary particles, that is, aggregation and Ostwald-Ripening process [54, 55]. A typical SEM image of the SAC nanoparticles (SAC4) synthesized at room temperature with a reaction time of 60 min was shown in Figure 4. The particles were basically spherical with a narrow diameter distribution of  nm. Despite the low content of Cu in the core-shell structure, the relatively small particle size could make it detectable. The formation process of SAC nanoparticles was illustrated in Figure 5.

There was another question concerning whether the Ag-Cu nuclei could actually be formed. Hume-Rothery rules were employed to prove the existence of nuclei of this specie in the literature [21]. In fact, the Ag-Cu system was almost absolutely immiscible at room temperature, which violated the Hume-Rothery rules [56, 57]. Moreover, the lattice constant of the Ag-Cu solid solution should be smaller than that of Ag owing to the lattice contraction caused by the substitution of Cu atoms to Ag atoms. However, the contrary result was obtained when the Ag-Cu nanoparticles were annealed at 300 K [58]. When the temperature increased to 493 K, the diffusion of Ag and Cu was rather difficult, which indicated poor solubility [59]. A study on the equilibrium solubility of Cu in Ag showed that the substitution of a solid solution could be formed only when the samples was annealed at temperature near 653 K [60]. So, the Ag-Cu nuclei and the following (Ag, Cu)3Sn phase were not recommended considering this result. One of the possible reasons for the disappearance of Cu in Duh’s work was the relatively large agglomeration rate of Sn atoms at the surface of Cu nuclei. The Sn shell in the nanoparticles was too thick for the X-ray to detect the Cu phases. Other reasons should be taken into consideration. For example, the aggregation took place during the growth process because of the absence the surfactant acting as a protective medium.

In summary, the formation process of SAC nanoparticles could be divided into three stages, similar to that of SnAg nanoparticles. First, the metal salts were mixed in anhydrous ethanol. The mixture was intensely stirred for 2 hours to produce a uniform precursor solution. Second, black particles precipitated when the reducing agent was added into the precursor. Most of the Ag and Cu cations were reduced to their metallic form and formed nuclei, respectively. At the same time, a few Sn atoms were generated in the solution. With mechanical agitation, the nuclei of Ag and Cu acted as the heterogeneous seed, absorbed Sn atoms and formed the intermetallic phases, Ag3Sn and Cu6Sn5. The rest of the Sn atoms, that were not used in the formation process of the intermetallic phases could nucleate and grew into the Sn phase. The capping effect of the surfactant and the size of the synthesized nanoparticles can be well controlled. This stage can also be described by the following reaction equations:

Finally, the Sn cations in the solution continued to be reduced until the termination of the reaction, which can be described as (3).

4. Conclusions

A chemical reduction method was used to synthesize lead-free alloy nanoparticles for use as a solder. The nucleation and growth mechanism in the anhydrous ethanol solution was discussed, and due to the difference in the redox potential, the Ag and Cu cations were reduced faster than Sn cations. The limited solubility of the reactant in the solvent ensured that the redox reaction took place. The immiscible nature of Cu and Ag at room temperature meant that these two species nucleated through the Finke mechanism separately. The nucleus acted as the heterogeneous seed during the growth process of the intermetallic compound. The nucleation mechanism of the Sn phase was similar to that of Ag and Cu, while the growth followed the homogeneous seeded mechanism. Moreover, the surfactant could control the size of the synthesized nanoparticles during the growth process, through a capping effect. The relatively thin Sn shell surrounded the intermetallic core and the light aggregation of the primary nanoparticles made the Cu detectable in the XRD pattern.


This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 50971086 and 51171105).


  1. M. F. Arenas, M. He, and V. L. Acoff, “Effect of flux on the wetting characteristics of SnAg, SnCu, SnAgBi, and SnAgCu lead-free solders on copper substrates,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1530–1536, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  2. J. H. Lee and Y. B. Park, “Abnormal failure behavior of Sn-3.5Ag solder bumps under excessive electric current stressing conditions,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2194–2200, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Y. M. Hung and C. M. Chen, “Electromigration of Sn-9wt.%Zn solder,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 887–893, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. F. Guo, G. Xu, H. He, M. Zhao, J. Sun, and C. H. Wang, “Effect of electromigration and isothermal aging on the formation of metal whiskers and hillocks in eutectic Sn-Bi solder joints and reaction films,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 2647–2658, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. H. Y. Guo, J. D. Guo, and J. K. Shang, “Influence of thermal cycling on the thermal resistance of solder interfaces,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 2470–2478, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. I. Ohnuma, M. Miyashita, K. Anzai et al., “Phase equilibria and the related properties of Sn-Ag-Cu based Pb-free solder alloys,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1137–1144, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  7. T. Siewert, S. Liu, D. R. Smith, and J. C. Madeni, “Database for solder properties with emphasis on new lead-free solders,” NIST & Colorado School of Mines, Release, vol. 4, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  8. P. Buffat and J. P. Borel, “Size effect on the melting temperature of gold particles,” Physical Review A, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 2287–2298, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. W. A. Jesser, G. J. Shiflet, G. L. Allen, and J. L. Crawford, “Equilibrium phase diagrams of isolated nano-phases,” Materials Research Innovations, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 211–216, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. Lee, J. Lee, T. Tanaka, H. Mori, and K. Penttilä, “Phase diagrams of nanometer-sized particles in binary systems,” Journal of Management, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 56–59, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. Lučić Lavčević and Z. Ogorelec, “Melting and solidification of Sn-clusters,” Materials Letters, vol. 57, pp. 4134–4139, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  12. C. R. M. Wronski, “The size dependence of the melting point of small particles of tin,” British Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1731–1737, 1967. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. W. A. Jesser, R. Z. Shneck, and W. W. Gile, “Solid-liquid equilibria in nanoparticles of Pb-Bi alloys,” Physical Review B, vol. 69, no. 14, Article ID 144121, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. S. Benjamin, “Dispersion strengthened superalloys by mechanical alloying,” Metallurgical Transactions, vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 2943–2951, 1970. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. Birringer, H. Gleiter, H. P. Klein, and P. Marquardt, “Nanocrystalline materials an approach to a novel solid structure with gas-like disorder?” Physics Letters A, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. 365–369, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  16. I. T. H. Chang and Z. Ren, “Simple processing method and characterisation of nanosized metal powders,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 375-377, no. 1-2, pp. 66–71, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. H. Bernard Ng, J. Yang, and W. Y. Fan, “Synthesis and self-assembly of one-dimensional sub-10 nm Ag nanoparticles with cyclodextrin,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 11, pp. 4141–4145, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. H. J. Jiang, K. S. Moon, and C. P. Wong, “Tin/silver/copper alloy nanoparticle pastes for low temperature lead-free interconnect applications,” in Proceedings of the 58th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC '08), pp. 1400–1404, May 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. L. Y. Hsiao and J. G. Duh, “Synthesis and characterization of lead-free solders with Sn-3.5Ag-xCu (x = 0.2, 0.5, 1.0) alloy nanoparticles-by the chemical reduction method,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 152, no. 9, pp. J105–J109, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. H. Jiang, K. S. Moon, F. Hua, and C. P. Wong, “Synthesis and thermal and wetting properties of tin/silver alloy nanoparticles for low melting point lead-free solders,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 19, no. 18, pp. 4482–4485, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. L. Y. Hsiao and J. G. Duh, “Revealing the nucleation and growth mechanism of a novel solder developed from Sn-3.5Ag-0.5Cu nanoparticles by a chemical reduction method,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1755–1760, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  22. X. Yang, Q. Wang, Y. Tao, and H. Xu, “A modified method to prepare diselenides by the reaction of selenium with sodium borohydride,” Journal of Chemical Research, no. 4, pp. 160–161, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  23. C. Zou, Y. Gao, B. Yang, and Q. Zhai, “Nanoparticles of Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu alloy synthesized at room temperature with large melting temperature depression,” Journal of Materials Science, pp. 1–6, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. W. Lee, R. Scholz, K. Nielsch, and U. Gösele, “A template-based electrochemical method for the synthesis of multisegmented metallic nanotubes,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 44, no. 37, pp. 6050–6054, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Qian, W. Wang, and Y. Qian, “Ultrafine powder of silver sulfide semiconductor prepared in alcohol solution,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1083–1086, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  26. X. F. Qian, J. Yin, S. Feng, S. H. Liu, and Z. K. Zhu, “Preparation and characterization of polyvinylpyrrolidone films containing silver sulfide nanoparticles,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2504–2506, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. Y. Robin, J. L. Sagué, and K. M. Fromm, “On the coordination behaviour of NO3 in coordination compounds with Ag+: part 1. Solubility effect on the formation of coordination polymer networks between AgNO3 and L (L = ethanediyl bis(isonicotinate) as a function of solvent,” CrystEngComm, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 403–416, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Szymańska-Chargot, A. Gruszecka, A. Smolira et al., “Formation of nanoparticles and nanorods via UV irradiation of AgNO3 solutions,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 486, no. 1-2, pp. 66–69, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. Corrias, G. Ennas, G. Licheri, G. Marongiu, and G. Paschina, “Amorphous metallic powders prepared by chemical reduction of metal ions with potassium borohydride in aqueous solution,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 363–366, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  30. D. Zeng and M. J. Hampden-Smith, “Synthesis and characterization of nanophase group 6 metal (M) and metal carbide (M2C) powders by chemical reduction methods,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 681–689, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  31. L. Mulfinger, S. D. Solomon, M. Bahadory, A. V. Jeyarajasingam, S. A. Rutkowsky, and C. Boritz, “Synthesis and study of silver nanoparticles,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 84, pp. 322–325, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  32. R. G. Reifler and B. F. Smets, “Enzymatic reduction of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene and related nitroarenes: kinetics linked to one-electron redox potentials,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 34, no. 18, pp. 3900–3906, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. O. S. Ivanova and F. P. Zamborini, “Size-dependent electrochemical oxidation of silver nanoparticles,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 70–72, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. M. P. Janssen and J. Moolhuysen, “State and action of the tin atoms in platinum-tin catalysts for methanol fuel cells,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 289–296, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  35. F. Kooli, V. Rives, and W. Jones, “Reduction of Ni2+-Al3+ and Cu2+-Al3+ layered double hydroxides to metallic Ni0 and Cu0 via polyol treatment,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 2231–2235, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  36. R. Qiu, X. L. Zhang, R. Qiao, Y. Li, Y. I. Kim, and Y. S. Kang, “CuNi dendritic material: synthesis, mechanism discussion, and application as glucose sensor,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 19, no. 17, pp. 4174–4180, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. V. K. Lamer and R. H. Dinegar, “Theory, production and mechanism of formation of monodispersed hydrosols,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 4847–4854, 1950. View at: Google Scholar
  38. M. A. Watzky and R. G. Finke, “Transition metal nanocluster formation kinetic and mechanistic studies. A new mechanism when hydrogen is the reductant: slow, continuous nucleation and fast autocatalytic surface growth,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 119, no. 43, pp. 10382–10400, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. H. Yu, P. C. Gibbons, K. F. Kelton, and W. E. Buhro, “Heterogeneous seeded growth: a potentially general synthesis of monodisperse metallic nanoparticles,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 123, no. 37, pp. 9198–9199, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. G. Schmid, H. West, J. O. Malm, J. O. Bovin, and C. Grenthe, “Catalytic properties of layered gold-palladium colloids,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 35, no. 17, pp. 1099–1103, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  41. Y. Luo, Y. Sun, U. Schwarz, and M. Armbrüster, “Systematic exploration of synthesis pathways to nanoparticulate ZnPd,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 24, pp. 3094–3100, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  42. W. W. Brandt, F. P. Dwyer, and E. C. Gyarfas, “Chelate complexes of 1,10-phenanthroline and related compounds,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 959–1017, 1954. View at: Google Scholar
  43. J. Ferguson, C. J. Hawkins, N. A. P. Kane-Maguire, and H. Lip, “Absolute configurations of 1,10-phenanthroline and 2,2′-bipyridine metal complexes,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 771–779, 1969. View at: Google Scholar
  44. J. Gallagher, C. H. B. Chen, C. Q. Pan, D. M. Perrin, Y. M. Cho, and D. S. Sigman, “Optimizing the targeted chemical nuclease activity of 1,10- phenanthroline-copper by ligand modification,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 413–420, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. N. H. Jang, J. S. Suh, and M. Moskovits, “Effect of surface geometry on the photochemical reaction of 1,10-phenanthroline adsorbed on silver colloid surfaces,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 101, no. 41, pp. 8279–8285, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. C. Lim, E. Sinn, and R. B. Martin, “Crystal structure of a mixed-ligand complex of copper(II), 1,10-phenanthroline, and glycylglycine dianion: glycylglycinato(1,10-phenanthroline)copper(II) trihydrate,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 807–811, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  47. M. Muniz-Miranda, “Surface enhanced Raman scattering and normal coordinate analysis of 1,10-phenanthroline adsorbed on silver sols,” Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 104, no. 33, pp. 7803–7810, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  48. C. Pettinari, M. Pellei, M. Miliani et al., “Tin(IV) and organotin(IV) complexes containing mono or bidentate N-donor ligands : III.1 1-methylimidazole derivatives: synthesis, spectroscopic and structural characterization,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 553, no. 1-2, pp. 345–369, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  49. S. Sarkar, M. Pradhan, A. K. Sinha, M. Basu, and T. Pal, “Chelate effect in surface enhanced Raman scattering with transition metal nanoparticles,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 439–444, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. D. S. Sigman, “Nuclease activity of 1,10-phenanthroline-copper ion,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 180–186, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  51. Y. Wang and J. Y. Lee, “Molten salt synthesis of tin oxide nanorods: morphological and electrochemical features,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 46, pp. 17832–17837, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. Y. Wang, J. Y. Lee, and T. C. Deivaraj, “Controlled synthesis of V-shaped SnO2 nanorods,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 36, pp. 13589–13593, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. C. Yoon, M. D. Kuwabara, A. Spassky, and D. S. Sigman, “Sequence specificity of the deoxyribonuclease activity of 1,10-phenanthroline-copper ion,” Biochemistry, pp. 2116–2121, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  54. I. M. Lifshitz and V. V. Slyozov, “The kinetics of precipitation from supersaturated solid solutions,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 19, no. 1-2, pp. 35–50, 1961. View at: Google Scholar
  55. C. Wagner, “Theorie der alterung von niederschlägen durch umlösen (Ostwald-Reifung),” Zeitschrift Für Elektrochemie, Berichte Der Bunsengesellschaft Für Physikalische Chemie, vol. 65, pp. 581–591, 1961. View at: Google Scholar
  56. H. W. Sheng, G. Wilde, and E. Ma, “The competing crystalline and amorphous solid solutions in the Ag-Cu system,” Acta Materialia, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 475–488, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. P. R. Subramanian and J. H. Perepezko, “The ag-cu (silver-copper) system,” Journal of Phase Equilibria, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 62–75, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. M. Hirai and A. Kumar, “Wavelength tuning of surface plasmon resonance by annealing silver-copper nanoparticles,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 100, no. 1, Article ID 014309, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. S. J. Kim, E. A. Stach, and C. A. Handwerker, “Fabrication of conductive interconnects by Ag migration in Cu-Ag core-shell nanoparticles,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 96, no. 14, Article ID 144101, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. Y. I. Vesnin and Y. V. Shubin, “Equilibrium solid solubilities in the Ag-Cu system by X-ray diffractometry,” Journal of Physics F, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2381–2386, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Weipeng Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1418 Views | 757 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.