Electromagnetic Properties of Inner Double Walled Carbon Nanotubes Investigated by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analytical technique was used to investigate the double walled carbon nanotubes (DWNTs) electromagnetic properties of inner walls. The local magnetic and electronic properties of inner nanotubes in DWNTs were analyzed using 25% 13C enriched C60 by which the effect of dipolar coupling could be minimized. The diamagnetic shielding was determined due to the ring currents on outer nanotubes in DWNTs. The NMR chemical shift anisotropy (CSA) spectra and spin-lattice relaxation studies reveal the metallic properties of the inner nanotubes with a signature of the spin-gap opening below 70 K.
With their special properties, such as superconductivity or magnetic shielding effect, extensive studies of double walled carbon nanotubes(DWNTs) have been conducted theoretically as well as experimentally [1–8]. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) study, which is one of the most important tools to investigate their electronic and local magnetic properties, however, has been limited due to transition metal impurities used as catalyst particles during synthesis. Recently, Singer et al. used DWNTs made from 89% enriched peapods by high temperature annealing, so that encapsulated fullerenes dominate NMR signal . From relaxation study, they found that all the inner nanotubes show 1D metallic Luttinger-liquid behavior, followed by the spin-gap opening at low temperature. Besides the interesting 1D behavior, there is still much more information in DWNTs to be explored. For example, a theoretical study by Marques et al. predicts that inner nanotubes would experience diamagnetic shifts due to ring currents from π electrons on outer nanotubes .
In our study, with the novel magnetic filtration purification method, we could obtain ferromagnetic catalyst-free diamagnetic single walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs). They produce well resolved NMR lines despite natural carbon abundance [11, 12]. This enables us to investigate the local magnetic and electronic properties of inner nanotubes in DWNTs using 25% enriched by which the effect of dipolar coupling could be minimized. As predicted by Marques et al., we found the diamagnetic shielding from outer nanotubes in DWNTs . The CSA NMR spectra and spin-lattice relaxation studies on DWNTs revealed the metallic properties of the inner nanotubes with a signature of the spin-gap opening below 70 K as claimed by Singer et al. .
2. Experimental Procedures
The starting material, SWNTs and 25% enriched , was purchased from Carbon Solution Inc. and MER Corporation, respectively. The magnetic purification is well described in . Briefly, SWNTs were oxidized in air for 10 minutes at 600°C following bath sonication in hydrochloric acid for 40 minutes at 650°C to remove bare Ni/Y catalyst particles. After the acid treated materials were dispersed in dimethylformamide (DMF) by bath sonication, the solution was filtered through the magnetic field of 1.1 Tesla. Peapods were then prepared by vapor phase filling for 10 hrs at 650°C, following 1 hr after annealing in dynamic vacuum to remove excessive enriched fullerenes. Finally, DWNTs were fabricated by annealing the peapods dynamic vacuum for 48 hrs at 1250°C. With Renishaw 100 spectrometer operating with red laser (633 nm) at room temperature, the development of inner tubes in DWNTs was verified. For the representative images of peapods and DWNTs, JOEL 2010 transmission electron microscope was used. NMR experiments were carried out in nanoNMRI group, Montpellier, using a Bruker ASX200 spectrometer at magnetic field of 4.2 T and Larmor frequency of 50.3 MHz. The NMR spectrum was performed using Han echo synchronized with a rotor spinning at 10 KHz. The spin-lattice relaxation time was measured by saturation-recovery technique. Temperature studies in NMR were performed in a sealed glass tube after being evacuated overnight at a dynamic vacuum of Torr. MAT NMR experiment was carried out using the 5-pulse sequence. Data acquisition was performed directly after the last pulse. The MAT rotor frequency was 150 Hz and varied from 0.1 s to 6 s within 40 steps. The free induction decay (FID) acquisition during the acquisition included 1024 points with a dwell time of 4 μs. A two-dimensional Fourier transform technique represents the isotropic chemical shift projection in one frequency dimension (F1) and the static anisotropic powder pattern along the other frequency axis (F2) [13–15].
3. Results and Discussion
In Figure 1, we show the Raman spectra of SWNTs (I), peapod (II), and DWNTs treated by annealing peapod samples (III). The radial breathing mode positions of the SWNTs at 150 and 167 cm−1 indicate the presence of tubes with diameters of 1.57 and 1.46 nm, respectively . This is in good agreement with the estimated tube diameter from the HR-TEM. In addition to the SWNT Raman modes, we see for the untreated peapod sample weak signals from the molecules confined in the SWNTs. The positions of the Ag(1) and the Ag(2) modes at 484 and 1450 cm−1 are downshifted compared to pristine due to the enrichment of the molecules. The DWNTs samples show additional Raman features in the spectral region of 250–350 cm−1. They originate from the inner nanotube after annealing fullerene, whose average diameter is 0.75 nm. This compares with the average diameter of inner tubes from the direct measurement in TEM images. Since Raman spectroscopy provided only limited information regarding composition of the sample, the most detailed information was obtained by NMR spectroscopy.
The NMR study was performed using Han echo synchronized with a rotor spinning at 10 KHz, on peapod, and on DWNTs synthesized from these peapods. It is possible to assign the observed effects confidently only to molecules of and nanotubes situated in the interior space of SWNT. Figure 2 shows the magic angle spinning NMR spectra of peapods (I) and DWNTs (II). The signal from the peapods can be fitted with three lines, the first at 111.3 ppm (-position), a second at 118.8 ppm, and a third at 148.2 ppm (-position). The line at 111.3 ppm is assigned to molecules in the interior of the SWNTs. This signal is diamagnetically shifted from the normal position of FCC , located at 143.6 ppm. The diamagnetic shift occurs due to a local magnetic field on the molecules produced by ring currents on the honeycomb surface of the nanotube [10, 17–19]. The same effect has been observed for encapsulated inside fullerene molecules . The sharp character of this line indicates that the molecules are still rotating inside the carbon nanotubes (-position). This result is in agreement with semiempirical calculations  and recent experiments, [17–19, 22] which show that molecules inside nanotubes rotate at the NMR time scale at room temperature. The signal at 118.8 ppm represents the NMR response of the carbons in the SWNTs [23, 24]. Finally, the line at 148.2 ppm represents molecules at the interior of SWNTs but located at tube defects, giving rise to a slight paramagnetic shift of the NMR line position compared to pristine . Its significant broadening compared to freely rotating suggests that the molecules are no longer rotating when located in the vicinity of nanotube defects (-position). The broadening indicates also that molecules are not located outside the SWNT, which would show up as a narrow line at 143.6 ppm . The DWNTs result in drastic modifications of the NMR spectra. The NMR MAS spectrum (Figure 2, (II)) shows that the signals of and molecules keep their individual ratio but the line positions and their fwhm are changed. Mention that the and shifted fullerenes transformed into shifted inner nanotubes. Fitting the NMR data for the DWNTs (Figure 3) can be done using one Lorentzian line at 118.8 ppm representing the outer SWNTs and a distribution of Lorentzian lines centered around 125.8 and 100 ppm representing the inner nanotubes at and positions, respectively [17–19]. This fit allows us to estimate that the SWNTs provide a contribution to the measured signal, whereas the remaining 84% comes from inner nanotubes. This result agrees well with a 70% filling factor of peapods and a 25% enrichment of encapsulated . As predicted by Marques et al. , the peak at 100 ppm is assigned to diamagnetically shifted inner nanotubes (-position) due to ring current from π electrons on outer nanotubes. The other peak at 125.8 ppm can be deconvoluted into two contributions, one from paramagnetically shifted inner nanotube (-position) close to defects on outer nanotubes and the other from outer nanotubes themselves. However, the diamagnetic shift in DWNTs (−26.6 ppm) is smaller than that in peapods (−36.9 ppm). In the current study, the magnitude of a diamagnetic shift is measured by the gap between paramagnetically and diamagnetically shifted peaks. The former shift is sensitive to the content of defects on outer nanotubes. The lesser number of defects in DWNTs than those in peapods will lead to the smaller paramagnetic shift and hence smaller gap. This is due to the heat treatment during the DWNTs production.
The difference between the inner nanotubes (125.8 ppm), relative to the outer nanotubes (118.8 ppm), is expected due to the paramagnetic shift for carbon located at tube defects and the smaller diameter in the former which modify the electronic structure of orbital [27–32].
For the investigation of shift anisotropy the magic angle turning (MAT) technique was applied. Two-dimensional Fourier transformation as a function of and results in the 2D-MAT spectrum of DWNTs in Figure 4. It is important to note that projections of the 2D spectrum onto the two axes of the contour plot do not directly represent the isotropic and chemical shift anisotropy (CSA) patterns, since data acquisition is already started after the last -pulse of the MAT pulse sequence. Therefore, the scaling of the axis in Figure 4(a) is displayed in arbitrary units. Projecting the spectrum onto the acquisition dimension axis at an angle arctan will result in the isotropic-shift spectrum, while projection on a perpendicular axis will result in the CSA powder pattern. is defined by the number of acquisition points and dwell times given by and . In the 2D spectrum two main peaks (A) and (B) are clearly visible, indicating the and positions of the inner nanotubes. Projecting the spectrum onto the acquisition dimension axis gives the same isotropic NMR spectrum shown in Figure 2 (II). Projecting the spectrum on a perpendicular axis yields the anisotropic (CSA) NMR spectrum in Figure 4(b) of DWNTs. However, the CSA NMR spectra exhibit a clear anisotropy reduction compared to SWNTs due to change into metallic-like shift anisotropy as reported by Goze-Bac et al. and Latil et al. [23, 24], which supports the results of Singer et al. that claimed that all inner nanotubes are metallic . There are two known contributions to the total NMR shift of metallic tubes, namely, the Knight shift K and the chemical shift , where the Knight shift arises from the hyperfine coupling of the nuclei to conduction electron spins and the chemical shift summarizes all contributions from orbital currents due to local magnetic fields. Both Knight shift K and spin-lattice relaxation time relaxation are affected by the density of states (DOS) at the Fermi surface n() shift and relaxation are dominated by the magnetic interaction with the conduction electrons of the metal . In order to go further in our electronic study and to obtain a better estimate of n(), spin-lattice relaxation time measurements on DWNTs were applied. At room temperature, in the inset of Figure 5, the observed relaxation curves signal a two-component model with one slow relaxing and one fast relaxing component, which can be rationalized by different types of inner nanotubes. Recent NMR studies on pristine SWNTs  and DWNTs  have used partly different models based on a stretched distribution of values around one average. Indeed, the shape of MAS NMR spectrum with delay time of 200 ms shows the clear difference compared to that with 20 s delay as shown in Figure 5, which forced us to use to fit the magnetization recovery, , with double exponential function of the type: where and are the equilibrium magnetizations for the two components. The relative magnitudes, and , with do not differ in a systematic way and are determined to be and . The slow and fast relaxing components derived from the fit at room temperature result in s and s. The two components are very small compared to SWNTs [23, 24] and are in good agreement with metallic doping nanotube at high intercalations level [36, 37] due to high density of states (DOS) of the metallic tubes.
NMR measurements as a function of temperature in Figure 6 can be expressed as where is the isotropic hyperfine coupling constant . We assume a hyperfine coupling of eV and fit the linear regime part of the NMR spin-lattice relaxation. Hence, we were able to estimate the of DWNTs. For the slow component we observed a linear regime following Korringa behavior, which is typical for a metallic Fermi liquid system. For the fast component we observed a Korringa behavior that decreases linearly down to 70 K, the deviation below this temperature is the signature of the spin-gap opening as Singer et al. claimed . From (2) can be extracted to be 0.057 and 0.011 states/(eVspinatom), for the fast and slow relaxation respectively. Since is inversely proportional to the diameter of nanotubes, theoretical for 0.7 nm nanotubes is predicted to be 0.03 states/(eVspinatom) or higher [7, 39]. The enhancement of the extracted compared to the theoretical value is expected from the interaction with outer nanotubes or from small doping caused by charge transfer from outer to inner nanotubes [3–6]. Indeed, also Hashimoto et al. performed HR-TEM study where only the inner tube was found to have metallic geometry in random observation .
Using 25% enriched by which the effect of dipolar coupling could be minimized enables us to investigate the local magnetic and electronic properties of inner nanotubes in DWNTs. NMR on DWNTs produced two well resolved isotropic shifts. The one at 100 ppm is assigned to diamagnetically shift inner nanotubes (-position) due to ring current from electrons on outer nanotubes. The other peak at 125.8 ppm can be deconvoluted into two contributions, one from paramagnetically shifted inner nanotube (-position) close to defects on outer nanotubes and the other from outer nanotubes themselves. For the investigation of shift anisotropy (CSA), the magic angle turning (MAT) technique was applied that exhibits a clear anisotropy reduction compared to SWNTs due to change into metallic-like shift anisotropy. The spin-lattice relaxation studies on DWNTs reveal a two-component model with one slow relaxing and one fast relaxing component which can be rationalized by different types of inner nanotubes. The two components are very small compared to SWNTs and are in good agreement with metallic nanotube due to high density of states (DOS) of the metallic tubes. The NMR measurements as a function of temperature confirm the metallic properties of the inner nanotubes with a signature of the spin-gap opening below 70 K.
E. Abou-Hamad and C. Goze-Bac contributed equally as corresponding authors.
Y. Kwon and D. Tomanek, “Electronic and structural properties of multiwall carbon nanotubes,” Physical Review B, vol. 58, no. 24, pp. R16001–R16004, 1998.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. H. Lambin, V. Meunier, and A. Rubio, “Electronic structure of polychiral carbon nanotubes,” Physical Review B, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 5129–5135, 2000.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Hashimoto, K. Suenaga, K. Urita et al., “Atomic correlation between adjacent graphene layers in double-wall carbon nanotubes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 94, no. 4, Article ID 045504, 4 pages, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Miyamoto, S. Saito, and D. Tomanek, “Electronic interwall interactions and charge redistribution in multiwall nanotubes,” Physical Review B, vol. 65, no. 4, Article ID 041402, 4 pages, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Okada and A. Oshiyama, “Curvature-induced metallization of double-walled semiconducting zigzag carbon nanotubes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, no. 21, Article ID 216801, 4 pages, 2003.View at: Google Scholar
W. Song, M. Ni, J. Lu et al., “Electronic structures of semiconducting double-walled carbon nanotubes: important effect of interlay interaction,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 414, no. 4–6, pp. 429–433, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Saito, R. Matsuo, T. Kimura, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, “Anomalous potential barrier of double-wall carbon nanotube,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 348, no. 3-4, pp. 187–193, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Simon, C. Kramberger, R. Pfeiffer et al., “Isotope engineering of carbon anotube systems,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 95, no. 1, Article ID 017401, 4 pages, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Singer, P. Wzietek, H. Alloul, F. Simon, and H. Kuzmany, “NMR evidence for gapped spin excitations in metallic carbon nanotubes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 95, no. 23, Article ID 236403, 4 pages, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. L. Marques, M. d'Avezac, and F. Mauri, “Magnetic response and NMR spectra of carbon nanotubes from ab initio calculations,” Physical Review B, vol. 73, no. 12, Article ID 125433, 6 pages, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kim and D. E. Luzzi, “Purification of pulsed laser synthesized single wall carbon nanotubes by magnetic filtration,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 35, pp. 16636–16643, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kim, O. N. Torrens, J. M. Kikkawa, E. Abou-Hamad, C. Goze-Bac, and D. E. Luzzi, “High-purity diamagnetic single-wall carbon nanotube buckypaper,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2982–2986, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bax, N. M. Szeverenyi, and G. E. Maciel, “Pulsed polarization transfer for 13C NMR in solids,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 227–232, 1982.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Z. Hu, W. Wang, F. Liu et al., “Magic-angle-turning experiments for measuring chemical-shift-tensor principal values in powdered solids,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance A, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 210–222, 1995.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Gan and R. R. Ernst, “An improved 2d magic-angle-turning pulse sequence for the measurement of chemical-shift anisotropy,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance A, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 140–143, 1996.View at: Google Scholar
S. M. Bachilo, M. S. Strano, C. Kittrell, R. H. Hauge, R. E. Smalley, and R. B. Weisman, “Structure-assigned optical spectra of single-walled carbon nanotubes,” Science, vol. 298, no. 5602, pp. 2361–2366, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Abou-Hamad, Y. Kim, A. V. Talyzin et al., “Hydrogenation of C60 in peapods: physical chemistry in nano vessels,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 113, no. 20, pp. 8583–8587, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Abou-Hamad, Y. Kim, T. Wågberg et al., “Molecular dynamics and phase transition in one-dimensional crystal of C60 encapsulated inside single wall carbon nanotubes,” ACS Nano, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 3878–3883, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kim, E. Abou-Hamad, A. Rubio et al., “Communications: nanomagnetic shielding: high-resolution NMR in carbon allotropes,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 132, no. 2, Article ID 021102, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Sternfeld, M. Saunders, R. J. Cross, and M. Rabinovitz, “The inside story of fullerene anions: a 3He NMR aromaticity probe,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 42, no. 27, pp. 3136–3139, 2003.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chen and J. Dong, “Electronic properties of peapods: effects of fullerene rotation and different types of tube,” Journal of Physics, vol. 16, no. 8, article 1401, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Matsuda, Y. Maniwa, and H. Kataura, “Highly rotational C60 dynamics inside single-walled carbon nanotubes: NMR observations,” Physical Review B, vol. 77, no. 7, Article ID 075421, 6 pages, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Goze-Bac, S. Latil, P. Lauginie et al., “Magnetic interactions in carbon nanostructures,” Carbon, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1825–1842, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Latil, L. Henrard, C. Goze-Bac, P. Bernier, and A. Rubio, “13C NMR chemical shift of single-wall carbon nanotubes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 86, no. 14, pp. 3160–3163, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. López-Urías, J. A. Rodríguez-Manzo, E. Muñoz-Sandoval, M. Terrones, and H. Terrones, “Magnetic response in finite carbon graphene sheets and nanotubes,” Optical Materials, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 110–115, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Wågberg, C. Goze-Bac, R. Röding et al., “13C NMR on intercalated 2D-polymerised C60 and modified peapods,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Winterschool/Euroconference on Electronic Properties of Novel Materials (IWEPNM '04), vol. 723 of AIP Conference Proceedings, p. 238, March 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Abou-Hamad, M.-R. Babaa, M. Bouhrara et al., “Structural properties of carbon nanotubes derived from 13C NMR,” Physical Review B, vol. 84, no. 16, Article ID 165417, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Zurek, C. J. Pickard, B. Walczak, and J. Autschbach, “Density functional study of the 13C NMR chemical shifts in small-to-medium-diameter infinite single-walled carbon nanotubes,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 110, no. 43, pp. 11995–12004, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Zurek, C. J. Pickard, and J. Autschbach, “Density functional study of the 13C NMR chemical shifts in single-walled carbon nanotubes with Stone-Wales defects,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 31, pp. 11744–11750, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Zurek, C. J. Pickard, and J. Autschbach, “A density functional study of the 13C NMR chemical shifts in fluorinated single-walled carbon nanotubes,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 113, no. 16, pp. 4117–4124, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Zurek, C. J. Pickard, and J. Autschbach, “Determining the diameter of functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes with 13C NMR: a theoretical study,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 25, pp. 9267–9271, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Sebastiani and K. N. Kudin, “Electronic response properties of carbon nanotubes in magnetic fields,” ACS Nano, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 661–668, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. V. Yazye and L. Helm, “Isotropic Knight shift of metallic carbon nanotubes,” Physical Review B, vol. 72, no. 24, Article ID 245416, 5 pages, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ihara, P. Wzietek, H. Alloul, M. H. Rummeli, Th. Pichler, and F. Simon, “Incidence of the Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid state on the NMR spin lattice relaxation in Carbon Nanotubes,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 90, article 17004, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
B. Dóra, M. Gulácsi, F. Simon, and H. Kuzmany, “Spin gap and luttinger liquid description of the NMR relaxation in carbon nanotubes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, no. 16, Article ID 166402, 4 pages, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Abou-Hamad, C. Goze-Bac, F. Nitze et al., “Electronic properties of Cs-intercalated single-walled carbon nanotubes derived from nuclear magnetic resonance,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 13, Article ID 053045, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bouhrara, Y. Saih, T. Wågberg, C. Goze-Bac, and E. Abou-Hamad, “High-resolution 13C nuclear magnetic resonance evidence of phase transition of Rb,Cs-intercalated single-walled nanotubes,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 110, no. 5, Article ID 054306, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X.-P. Tang, A. Kleinhammes, H. Shimoda et al., “Electronic structures of single-walled carbon nanotubes determined by NMR,” Science, vol. 288, no. 5465, pp. 492–494, 2000.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Mintmire and C. T. White, “First-principles band structures of armchair nanotubes,” Applied Physics A, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 65–69, 1998.View at: Google Scholar