Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 782139 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/782139

Yongjun Chen, Yuanfang Luo, Zhixin Jia, Demin Jia, Jue Wang, "Preparation and Characterization of Polyurethane/Nanocopper Composites and Their Application in Intrauterine Devices", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2013, Article ID 782139, 5 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/782139

Preparation and Characterization of Polyurethane/Nanocopper Composites and Their Application in Intrauterine Devices

Academic Editor: Zhongkui Hong
Received19 Jul 2013
Revised17 Sep 2013
Accepted18 Sep 2013
Published20 Oct 2013

Abstract

A novel intrauterine devices material, polyurethane/nano-copper (PU/NC) nanocomposite, was prepared. The structure, morphology, copper ion (Cu2+) release rate, and water absorption of PU/NC nanocomposites were investigated. The results indicated that the nanocoppers were uniformly dispersed in the matrix. The release rates of Cu2+ of PU/NC nanocomposites remained stable during the experimentation time. These results indicated that the PU/NC nanocomposites have a great potential to replace current commercial intrauterine devices materials.

1. Introduction

The intrauterine devices (IUDs) are the most widely used reversible method of contraception in the world today [1, 2]. Use of IUD which can release Cu2+  in vivo is one of the effective and easy contraceptive methods. Postpartum IUD insertion, however, may increase the risk of problems, such as perforation, pain, and bleeding, which were induced by the exposed copper and the burst release of Cu2+ [3, 4] causing cytotoxicity. In order to decrease the limitations of conventional Cu-IUD materials, polymer matrix composites have been developed because of their superiority of controlled release of Cu2+ [58]. Polyurethanes (PUs) have been widely used for numerous biomedical applications due to their excellent mechanical properties and biocompatibility [912]. In this paper, new PU/NC nanocomposites were prepared in situ composite method. In this paper, polyurethane was chosen as the matrix and nanocopper was used as functional filler. The structure, morphology, Cu2+ release rate, and water absorption of PU/NC nanocomposites were investigated. PU/NC nanocomposite showed stable Cu2+ release behavior by a combination of nanostructure and hydrophilicity modification.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Instruments

Nanocopper was obtained from Shanghai Super Wei Nami Technology Co. Ltd., China; the particle size of nano-copper was 50 nm. Diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) was obtained from Yantai Wanhua Polyurethanes Co. Ltd., China. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) (Mn = 1000) was obtained from Dow Chemical, USA. Polytetramethylene ether glycol (PTMG) was obtained from Mitsubishi Chemical Co., Japan. Both PEG and PTMG were dried under vacuum for 72 h before use. Calcium chloride dihydrate (CaCl2), 1,4-butanediol, glucose, sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), and sodium phosphate monobasic dihydrate (NaH2PO4·2H2O) were obtained from Tianjin Fu Chen Chemical Reagent Factory, China, and used without further purification. Commercial devices (T220c), were obtained from Yantai Family Planning Medicine & Apparatus Co., Ltd., China. UV/Vis absorbance was measured on a UV-4802 UV/Vis Spectrophotometer (Unico Shanghai Instruments Co., Ltd., China). The morphology of the fracture surfaces of the tensile specimens was observed on a scanning electron microscope (SEM) FEI Nova Nano SEM 430 (FEI America Inc.) at an accelerating voltage of 5.0 kV. Fracture surfaces of specimen were sputter-coated with gold prior to their observation. The contact angles of the composites were measured on a Drop Shape Analysis System DSA100 (Krüss GmbH, Germany). ATR-FTIR analysis was conducted using a VERTEX 70 FT-IR (Bruker Optics, Inc., Germany) with an ATR accessory.

2.2. Preparation of PU/Nanocopper Composites

The compositions of the PU/nano-copper composites were show in Table 1. The PEG and PTMG were first mixed at 80°C for 1 h, and then the NC particles were dispersed in the mixture of PEG and PTMG via an ultrasonicator for 1 h at 80°C. Then, the stoichiometric amount of MDI was added to the suspension and reacted at 80°C for 2 h, yielding the prepolyurethane. The whole reaction was carried out under nitrogen with mechanical stirring. The stoichiometric amount of 1,4-butanediol (it was calculated according to the residual amount of NCO) was mixed with the pre-polyurethane for 60 s under a violent stirring condition at 110°C. Subsequently, the mixture was cured at 100°C under pressure for 10 h in a metal mould.


SamplesPEGPTMGMDIBDOCopperContact angle (°)Water sorption (%)

PU406066.76.840
P0010066.76.845
P10109066.76.845
P20208066.76.845
P30307066.76.845
P40406066.76.845

2.3. Measurement of Cu2+ Release Rate in Simulated Uterine Solutions

Absorbance measurements were employed to measure the Cu2+ release rate of PU/NC nanocomposites and T220c in a simulated uterine solution according to the previous literature [1315]. The composition of the simulated uterine solution is shown in Table 2. The pH value of 6.3 was established by adding dilute hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide solution and was adjusted periodically throughout the exposure time. Three specimens of every composite were prepared with a size of 5.0 × 5.0 × 1.0 cm and then suspended into 50 mL simulated uterine solution at 37.0 ± 0.1°C. The amount of released Cu2+ of PU/NC nanocomposites and the commercial IUD was determined on the UV-4802 weekly for 3 months.


Concentration in water (g/L)
NaHCO3NaH2PO4 2H2OGlucoseCaCl2KClNaCl

0.250.0720.500.1670.224 4.97

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structure Characterization of PU/NC Nanocomposites

The ATR-FTIR spectroscopy of PU and the P40 are shown in Figure 1. The N–H stretching vibrations bonds were detected at 3150–3500 cm−1. The peaks at 2935 and 2855 cm−1 were attributed to CH2 asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations, respectively. The peaks between 1600 and 1800 cm−1 indicated the C–O stretching vibrations, and the 1520–1550 cm−1 are associated with the urethane N–H bending C–N stretching. The typical peaks of PEG and PTMG were also detected at 1260 cm−1 (symmetric CH3 bending), 1080 cm−1 (C–O–C stretching), and 816 cm−1 (CH3 rocking), respectively [16].

3.2. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of PU, nano-copper and P40. PU had broad diffraction peaks in 20° and 42° because there were no microcrystalites in PU samples. In the XRD spectra of the PU/NC nanocomposite, the peaks at 36° belonged to cuprous oxide, and the peaks in 43°, 50°, and 74° belonged to the nano-copper.

3.3. Contact Angle and Water Sorption

Contact angle and water sorption of the PU/nanocopper, nanocomposites are summarized in Table 1. In this research, the hydrophilicity of the nanocomposites increased with the increasing content of the PEG. The contact angle and water sorption of the PU/NC nanocomposites increased with increasing the content of PEG in the soft segments of the composites. This is because the water sorption of the nanocomposites was influenced by the hydrophilicity of the nanocomposites [17, 18]. Therefore, the contact angle and water sorption of nanocomposites increased with increasing the content of the hydrophilic segments, for PEG is more hydrophilic than PTMG.

3.4. Cu2+ Release Rate of the PU/NC Nanocomposite

The Cu2+ release rates of the composites are shown in Figure 3. The average Cu2+ release rates of P0, P10, P20, P30, and P40 are 42.4, 46.5, 45.0, and 60.4 μg/day, respectively. In the first month (as shown in Table 3), there were no burst releases because the nano-copper was wrapped in the polyurethane segments. However, the Cu2+ release rates of the PU/NC nanocomposites increased with increase the content of PEG in the soft segment. It may be attributes to the hydrophilicity of the composites. As shown in Figure 3, after six weeks, the release rates of the PU/NC nanocomposites remained relatively stable after six weeks.


SamplesP0P10P20P30P40

Cu2+ release rates (μg/day)

The relative Cu2+ release rates of P10 and commercial T220c are shown in Figure 4. The Cu2+ release rate of T220c showed a burst release in the first two weeks, and the average release rate was about 94 μg/day in the first three months. But the average Cu2+ release rate per day in the first three months of P10 was only about 46 μg/day, and there was no initial burst (as shown in Table 4). The average Cu2+ release rate was always about 35–55 μg/day. This indicates that the PU/NC nanocomposites have a great potential to replace current commercial Cu-IUD materials.


SamplesP0P10P20P30P40

Cu2+ release rates (μg/day)

3.5. Microstructure of the PU/NC Nanocomposites

To investigate the dispersion state of nano-copper in the polyurethane matrix, the tensile fractured surface of P10 was examined by SEM (Figure 5). A uniform dispersion of nano-copper was observed, and no obvious aggregation occurred.

4. Conclusions

PU/NC nanocomposites were prepared and used as intrauterine devices. The nano-copper was uniformly dispersed in the nanocomposites. The burst release of the Cu2+ could be eliminated completely, and the release rates remained relatively stable over three months. These results indicate that the PU/NC nanocomposites have a great potential to replace current commercial intrauterine devices.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Fundamental Research for the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1134005), the Central Universities (2012ZM0009) for financial supports, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51003031), and the National Key Technology R&D Program of China (2012BAE01B03).

References

  1. M. C. Fox, J. Oat-Judge, K. Severson et al., “Immediate placement of intrauterine devices after first and second trimester pregnancy termination,” Contraception, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 34–40, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. Kulier, P. A. O'Brien, F. M. Helmerhorst, M. Usher-Patel, and C. D'Arcangues, “Copper containing, framed intra-uterine devices for contraception,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 17, no. 4, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  3. L. Patchen and E. K. Berggren, “Use of the copper T380A intrauterine device by adolescent mothers: continuation and method failure,” Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 71–73, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. X. Xia, Y. Tang, C. Xie, Y. Wang, S. Cai, and C. Zhu, “An approach to give prospective life-span of the copper/low-density-polyethylene nanocomposite intrauterine device,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1773–1781, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. X. Xia, S. Cai, J. Hu, and C. Xie, “Water absorption characteristics of novel Cu/LDPE nanocomposite for use in intrauterine devices,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research B, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 345–352, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Li, J. Suo, X. Huang, C. Ye, and X. Wu, “Release behavior of copper ion in a novel contraceptive composite,” Contraception, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 233–237, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Z. Yang, C. Xie, H. Xiang, J. Feng, X. Xia, and S. Cai, “IDM release behavior and surface characteristics of the novel Cu/IDM/LDPE nanocomposite for intrauterine device,” Colloids and Surfaces B, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 276–280, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. X. Zhou, Y. Li, X. Jiang, L. Qiu, and J. Liu, “Release of copper and indomethacin from intrauterine devices immersed in simulated uterine fluid,” European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 205–212, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Dawlee and M. Jayabalan, “Development of segmented polyurethane elastomers with low iodine content exhibiting radiopacity and blood compatibility,” Biomedical Materials, vol. 6, no. 5, Article ID 055002, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. P. P. Vicario, Z. Lu, Z. Wang, K. Merritt, D. Buongiovanni, and P. Chen, “Antithrombogenicity of hydromer's polymeric formula F202 immobilized on polyurethane and electropolished stainless steel,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research B, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 136–144, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. L. Peng and G. R. Kinsel, “Improving the sensitivity of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry by using polyethylene glycol modified polyurethane MALDI target,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 400, no. 1, pp. 56–60, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H.-S. Choi, H. Suh, J.-H. Lee et al., “A polyethylene glycol grafted bi-layered polyurethane scaffold: preliminary study of a new candidate prosthesis for repair of a partial tracheal defect,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 265, no. 7, pp. 809–816, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. B. Cao, T. Xi, and Y. Zheng, “Release behavior of cupric ions for TCu380A and TCu220C IUDs,” Biomedical Materials, vol. 3, no. 4, Article ID 044114, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Cai, X. Xia, C. Zhu, and C. Xie, “Cupric ion release controlled by copper/low-density polyethylene nanocomposite in simulated uterine solution,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research B, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 220–225, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y. Feng, W.-K. Teo, K.-S. Siow, K.-L. Tan, and A.-K. Hsieh, “The corrosion behaviour of copper in neutral tap water. Part I: corrosion mechanisms,” Corrosion Science, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 369–385, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. E. Campos, R. Cordeiro, A. C. Santos, C. Matos, and M. H. Gil, “Design and characterization of bi-soft segmented polyurethane microparticles for biomedical application,” Colloids and Surfaces B, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 477–482, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Shibaya, Y. Suzuki, M. Doro, H. Ishihara, N. Yoshihara, and M. Enomoto, “Effect of soft segment component on moisture-permeable polyurethane films,” Journal of Polymer Science B, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 573–583, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Mondal and J. L. Hu, “Structural characterization and mass transfer properties of nonporous segmented polyurethane membrane: influence of hydrophilic and carboxylic group,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 274, no. 1-2, pp. 219–226, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Yongjun Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1152 Views | 713 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.