Optical Properties of Nanoparticles and NanocompositesView this Special Issue
Morphology and Optical Property of ZnO Nanostructures Grown by Solvothermal Method: Effect of the Solution Pretreatment
Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanostructures with different morphologies such as nanopyramids, nanosheets, and nanoparticles have been grown by a simple solvothermal method. The influence of solution pretreatmentt on the morphology and optical properties of ZnO nanostructures has been studied. The experimental results revealed the morphology of ZnO transformed from nanopyramids or nanosheets to nanoparticles after solution pretreatment. Raman and photoluminescence spectra are recorded to examine the crystallinity and optical property of the samples.
ZnO has been recognized as one of the most important II–VI compound semiconductor materials in scientific research and technological applications, owing to its wide direct band-gap (3.37 eV), large exciton binding energy (60 m eV) at room temperature [1, 2], noncentrosymmetric structures, and various shape-induced functions. Compared to the bulk material, ZnO nanostructures have a wide range of applications including catalysts , piezoelectric devices , optoelectronic devices , photovoltaic cells , and gas sensors [7, 8] due to their unique physical and chemical properties. In recent years, lots of research has been focused on the synthesis, characteristics, growth mechanism, device fabrication, and performance improvement of ZnO nanostructures with various morphologies including nanowires , nanorods , nanobelts , nanotubes , nanosheets [13, 14], nanopyramids [15, 16], hollow nanospheres , and quantum dots , which have been fabricated via different methods, such as chemical vapor deposition, sol-gel method, hydrothermal method, and solvothermal method [19–22]. Among these, relatively little is known about the controlled synthesis of the different morphologies of ZnO simply by adjusting the synthetic conditions. In this work, we have investigated the influence of solution pretreatment on morphology and optical properties of ZnO nanostructures grown by solvothermal process.
2. Materials and Methods
Zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn (OAc)2·2H2O, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.), zinc nitrate hydrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.), oleylamine (OM, 96%, J&K Scientific Ltd.), and dodecanol (DDL, 98%, Acros Organics) used in the experiments were of analytical purity. Typically, 0.5 mmol Zn(OAc)2·2H2O or Zn (NO3)2·6H2O was added to a mixed solvent composed of 3 mL OM and 6 mL DDL at room temperature. The resulting slurry was heated to 120°C in a vacuum to remove water for solution pretreatment. The resulting mixture was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave (20 mL) for solvothermal synthesis at 180°C for 2 h in an electric oven. After the reaction, the autoclave was cooled and the ZnO products were centrifuged, rinsed several times with ethanol in order to remove the residual reactants, and dispersed in cyclohexane.
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses were performed on a D-MAX 2200 VPC X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα irradiation ( Å) at a scanning speed of 0.014°/sec over the range of 20–60°. The electronic morphology of the samples was examined by Hitachi S-4800 scanning electron microscope (SEM) and FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit transmission electron microscope (TEM). Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of samples were recorded using Jobin-Yvon Lab-Ram high-resolution spectrometer with He-Cd laser with the wavelength 325 nm. Raman spectra of samples were recorded using Jobin-Yvon Lab-Ram high-resolution spectrometer with laser of wavelength 633 nm.
3. Results and Discussion
The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the as-synthesized samples are shown in Figure 1. The XRD patterns of the samples using Zn(OAc)2·2H2O and Zn(NO3)2·6H2O as raw materials indicate a pure hexagonal wurtzite-type ZnO phase (JCPDS number 75-1526) and (JCPDS number 05-664) with high crystallinity, respectively.
The SEM images of the as-synthesized samples are shown in Figure 2. When Zn(OAc)2·2H2O was used as raw material, the samples without solution pretreatment have a pyramidal morphology with an average size of ~170 nm (side-edge length). The trigonal and hexagonal particle shapes observed in the TEM image thus correspond to the side-view projections of the pyramids. After solution pretreatment, the samples were transformed into nanoparticles with the average diameter of ~27 nm. When Zn(NO3)2·6H2O was used as raw material, the samples without solution pretreatment have a nanosheet morphology with an average size of ~55 nm. The thickness of nanosheet was about 15 nm. After solution pretreatment, the samples were also transformed into nanoparticles with the average diameter of ~26 nm. From the above experimental results, a possible mechanism can be deduced. The OM-DDL mixture played a key role in the formation of different ZnO nanostructures. The 001 plane is the most rapid growth rate plane during the crystal planes of hexagonal structure ZnO and is the preferred growth direction. When Zn(OAc)2·2H2O was used as raw material, the OM-DDL mixture could result in strong electrostatic interaction with the polar surfaces of the growing ZnO nanocrystals thus resulting in decreasing the surface energy of polar surfaces and hence slowing down the growth rate of the polar planes. This could result in the polar plane being the exposed basal surface of the nanopyramid which grows slowly with well-developed facets . When Zn(NO3)2·6H2O was used as raw material, the intrinsically anisotropic growth of ZnO along the 001 direction is substantially suppressed and crystal growth then proceeds sideways, which results in the formation of ZnO nanosheets. Pretreatment of solution may reduce suppressing effect in the growth of ZnO nanocrystals, leading to the formation of nanoparticles.
Raman spectra of ZnO samples using 633 nm laser are shown in Figure 3. E2 (low) mode at 99 cm−1 and E2 (high) mode at 437 cm−1 dominate in the Raman scattering spectra, indicating that all the samples had perfect crystal quality. The peak at 331 cm−1 can be attributed to the E2 (high)-E2 (low) mode of ZnO, which is assigned to the second-order Raman spectrum arising from zone-boundary phonons of the hexagonal ZnO [24, 25].
Figure 4 shows the room temperature PL spectrum of the samples with using 325 nm laser. There are two emission bands in the PL spectrum: a strong and narrow near UV emission at 381 nm and a broad but weak spectral band ranging from 450 to 600 nm. The near UV peak is due to the recombination of electron and hole in an exciton, while the visible emission is due to the presence of various point defects, such as interstitial oxygen and oxygen vacancies. In this work, the visible emission of ZnO nanopyramids and nanosheets is stronger than that of ZnO nanoparticles, suggesting that the content of oxygen vacancy in ZnO nanopyramids and nanosheets is larger than that in ZnO nanoparticles. The observation of such a strong emission band from excitons rather than from defects might imply that the samples hold high crystallinity or low lattice disorder, specially after solution pretreatment.
ZnO nanostructures have been grown by solvothermal method. The solution pretreatment is a key factor in the morphological control of ZnO nanostructures. The morphology of ZnO transformed from nanopyramids or nanosheets to nanoparticles by solution pretreatment. The process is simple and leads to highly crystalline particles with controllable morphology. The growth mechanism is discussed. ZnO nanopyramids, nanosheets, and nanoparticles exhibit excellent emission properties.
We gratefully acknowledge the financial aids from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (Grant no. 2012300004109568) and National Key Technology R&D Program of China (Grant no. 2013BAC13B01).
P. D. Yang, H. Q. Yan, S. Mao et al., “Controlled growth of ZnO nanowires and their optical properties,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 323–331, 2002.View at: Google Scholar
X. Wang, M. Y. Liao, Y. T. Zhong et al., “ZnO hollow spheres with double-yolk egg structure for high-performance photocatalysts and photodetectors,” Advanced Materials, vol. 24, no. 25, pp. 3421–3425, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
J. H. He, J. J. Ke, P. H. Chang et al., “Development of Ohmic nanocontacts via surface modification for nanowire-based electronic and optoelectronic devices: ZnO nanowires as an example,” Nanoscale, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 3399–3404, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
Y. T. Shi, C. Zhu, L. Wang et al., “Optimizing nanosheet-based ZnO hierarchical structure through ultrasonic-assisted precipitation for remarkable photovoltaic enhancement in quasi-solid dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 26, pp. 13097–13103, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
S. Z. Yang, L. F. Wang, X. Z. Tian et al., “The piezotronic effect of Zinc oxide nanowires studied by in situ TEM,” Advanced Materials, vol. 24, no. 34, pp. 4676–4682, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
C. Q. Zhu, B. A. Lu, Q. Su et al., “A simple method for the preparation of hollow ZnO nanospheres for use as a high performance photocatalyst,” Nanoscale, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 3060–3064, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
J. E. Stehr, S. L. Chen, S. Filippov et al., “Defect properties of ZnO nanowires revealed from an optically detected magnetic resonance study,” Nanotechnology, vol. 24, no. 1, Article ID 015701, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
Q. Zhang, C. G. Tian, A. P. Wu et al., “A facile one-pot route for the controllable growth of small sized and well-dispersed ZnO particles on GO-derived graphene,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 23, pp. 11778–11784, 2012.View at: Google Scholar