Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 143094, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/143094
Research Article

Transparent Electrodes with Nanotubes and Graphene for Printed Optoelectronic Applications

1Institute of Metrology and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Mechatronics, Warsaw University of Technology, św. A. Boboli 8, 02-525 Warsaw, Poland
2Institute of Electronic Materials Technology, Wólczyńska 133, 01-919 Warsaw, Poland

Received 1 March 2014; Revised 20 June 2014; Accepted 20 June 2014; Published 24 July 2014

Academic Editor: Zheng-Hong Huang

Copyright © 2014 Marcin Słoma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We report here on printed electroluminescent structures containing transparent electrodes made of carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets. Screen-printing and spray-coating techniques were employed. Electrodes and structures were examined towards optical parameters using spectrophotometer and irradiation meter. Electromechanical properties of transparent electrodes are exterminated with cyclical bending test. Accelerated aging process was conducted according to EN 62137 standard for reliability tests of electronics. We observed significant negative influence of mechanical bending on sheet resistivity of ITO, while resistivity of nanotube and graphene based electrodes remained stable. Aging process has also negative influence on ITO based structures resulting in delamination of printed layers, while those based on carbon nanomaterials remained intact. We observe negligible changes in irradiation for structures with carbon nanotube electrodes after accelerated aging process. Such materials demonstrate a high application potential in general purpose electroluminescent devices.

1. Introduction

Transparent electrodes are used in a variety of applications in modern electronic systems. This includes touch screens [15], transparent cathodes for photovoltaics [610], window heaters [1114], electromagnetic shielding [15], or even speakers [1618]. The most common application is front electrode for almost all types of displays: LCDs, OLEDs, and thick film electroluminescent structures (TFELs) [1922]. Commonly used materials are transparent conductive oxides (TCO), for example, indium tin oxide (ITO) [23, 24], ZnO [2527], and antimony thin oxide (ATO) [2830]. Alternatively metallic electrodes made of Ag nanostructures are introduced [3133]. In many cases there is an additional need to provide the elasticity of an electrode, where TCOs cannot be implemented because of their low mechanical strength. There are also some other disadvantages of using TCOs like expensive coating technique (sputtering), only effective for mass production, and high sensitivity to harsh environmental conditions which are causing the decrease of conductivity [34]. Above-mentioned reasons led researchers to alternative materials for transparent conductive layers (TCL) like conductive polymers (PEDOT:PSS) [7, 9] or graphene layers [3539]. Conjugated polymers are known for their low resistance to environmental factors, like humidity or oxygen [40, 41], and graphene films are produced with CVD method, which still creates problems in mass production of large area electrodes. In this field also other solutions are introduced, like carbon nanotubes [4, 5, 10].

We present fabrication of TFEL structures with the use of elaborated transparent electrodes with oligo walled carbon nanotubes (OWCNTs) and graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs). Structures were subjected to series of experiments: transmittance measurements of electrodes and bending tests for evaluation of resistivity stability, irradiance comparison of structures with different colors of luminophores (orange, blue, and blue-green) and different types of electrodes (ITO, OWCNT, and GNP-CNT), and accelerated aging of electroluminescent structures demonstrating influence on mechanical properties of TCLs.

2. Materials and Preparation

TFEL structures were prepared on diverse transparent electrodes deposited on PET foil. ITO on PET was acquired commercially. Composite layers with CNTs, GNPs, and GNP + CNT were coated on PET foil using spray-coating method. Luminophore, dielectric, and silver electrode layers were screen-printed on top of transparent electrodes.

2.1. Materials

First type of nanomaterial investigated in research was CCVD grown oligowalled carbon nanotubes, commercially available from Cheap Tubes Inc. (USA). Observed Raman spectra (Figure 1(a)) are typical for multiwalled carbon nanotubes with small diameters. Additional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations (Figure 1(b)) allowed confirming assumptions that we have carbon nanotubes of small diameter with length around 10–20 µm, organized in bundles.

fig1
Figure 1: (a) Raman spectra and (b) SEM micrograph of OWCNT material.

Second type of nanomaterial investigated in research was graphene nanoplatelets from the same supplier. Again, Raman analysis indicates that material consists of few layer graphene structures (Figure 2(a)) which was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy observations (Figure 2(b)). Mean diameter of graphene nanoplatelets was in range of 5 to 15 µm. According to supplier GNPs were obtained by chemical method, employing oxidization of graphite with the mixture of H2SO4, NaNO3, and KMnO4, known as Hummer’s and Offerman method. Obtained graphene oxide was further exfoliated and reduced by hydrazine.

fig2
Figure 2: (a) Raman spectra and (b) SEM micrograph of GNP material.

For elaborated structures, luminophore powders from GTP (USA) were acquired: GG45 High Brite-green, GG25 Super Brite-blue-green, and GG13 High Brite-orange, with mean particle size in range of 20–30 µm. For dielectric compositions barium titanate BaTiO3 nanopowder from IAM (Germany) was used. Performed SEM observations and granulometric analysis (Figure 3) showed that the average grain size is 137 nm, though there were also larger grains observed. For metallic electrode commercial silver lacquer L-121 from ITME (Poland) was used.

143094.fig.003
Figure 3: SEM micrograph of BaTiO3 dielectric powder.

Final compositions consist of functional filler (CNTs, GNPs, luminophores or dielectric powders) and polymer vehicle. To prepare polymer vehicle poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) MW 350 000 from Sigma-Aldrich was dissolved in diethylene glycol butyl ether acetate with magnetic mixer for 48 hours at 40°C. Obtained this way 8 wt.% solution of PMMA in solvent was used as vehicle for luminophore and dielectric powders. Spray-coating inks contain 0.02 wt.% solution of PMMA in organic solvent, to achieve desired low viscosity.

2.2. Preparation

To obtain final compositions, carbon nanomaterials and luminophore/dielectric powders were dispersed in corresponding polymer vehicles.

Spray-coating CNT and GNP inks were prepared by mixing carbon fillers and polymer vehicle in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min in 25°C. Nanotube ink contained 0.31 wt.% OWCNT in vehicle, and GNP ink contained 0.35 wt.% platelets with additional 0.1 wt.% OWCNT in vehicle.

Luminophore powders (60 wt.%) were mixed with the 8 wt.% PMMA vehicle with pestle and mortar followed by homogenization on three-roll mill to break remaining agglomerates. The dielectric paste consisted of 76.3 wt.% BaTiO3 and additional 0.8 wt.% of MALIALM SC-0505K surfactant from NOF Corp. (Japan).

2.3. Printing

TFEL structure consists of PET substrate with TCL and three main layers printed on top: luminophore, dielectric, and last metallic electrode. Schematic illustration of such structure is presented in Figure 4.

143094.fig.004
Figure 4: Visualization of printed TFEL.

Transparent electrodes were made using spray-coating method. Airbrush gun with 350 µm nozzle diameter was supplied with compressed air (pressure 0,5 MPa) and spraying was done with 100 mm distance between the nozzle and the PET substrate. Screen-printing was made using polyester screen with density 67 T for luminophore, dielectric, and silver layers. Double dielectric layer was printed to ensure that no electric breakdowns in capacitor structure will take place. Spray-coated and screen-printed layers were cured in a chamber dryer in 125°C for 30 min.

3. Experimental

Elaborated TFEL structures are supplied with alternating voltage from HV generator, indicated with peak-to-peak values. Main interest in the conducted experiments was focused on comparison of properties of composite carbon nanomaterials electrodes with ITO. Irradiance measurements from all types of structures were conducted with the same supply parameters, measured with Thorlabs PM100D power meter equipped with S121C sensor. Additionally optical properties measurements of all TCLs were taken in 400–900 nm spectrum on Lambda 40 spectrophotometer from Perkin-Elmer. Sheet resistivity measurements were done with Keithley 2636A dual-channel source measure unit and four-probe method. Mechanical bending tests were performed on specially adapted laboratory stand, with 350 cycles per minute and bending to 0,14  curvature. Bent sample was attached from one side to a static fixture and on the other side to a movable grip which caused a warp around symmetry axis. Accelerated aging process was conducted according to EN 62137 standard for reliability tests of electronics in Heraeus HT 7012 S2 thermal shock chamber. The thermal cycle was set to 125°C for upper and °C for lower temperatures, respectively, and cycled equally in 1-hour period with 5-second temperature shift. Tests were conducted without additional humidification or addition of aggressive atmospheres.

4. Results and Discussion

Printed electroluminescent structures were fully functional and were emitting a color light according to luminophore type. Structures with TCLs filled only with GNPs were not functional, which is related to high sheet resistivity of that TCL (around 1,5 MΩ/sq). This is significantly higher value than reported form previous experiments [4244]. Reported types of layers are generally deposited without additional binder, and while they exhibit resistances below thousands of ohms, they are vulnerable to mechanical factors-peel under scratching or bending-what authors observed in another experiment with GNP and CNT layers deposited without polymer binder or fired at elevated temperature. From that perspective it is possible to use such layers in encapsulated systems, such as capacitors or rigid solar cells, but they do not meet requirements for elastic electronic applications.

Although GNP layers exhibited extremely high resistivity, small addition of OWCNTs (0.1 wt.%) allowed lowering resistivity by more than order of magnitude, resulting in functional structures. Picture of working electroluminescent structures is presented in Figure 5.

143094.fig.005
Figure 5: Printed electroluminescent structures with three types of TCL (from top): ITO, CNTs, and GNPs + CNTs. Colors (from left): orange, green, and blue-green. Inaccurate color mapping and intensities are related to camera technical restrictions.

Thickness of obtained TCL layers was controlled during coating process and remained on the level of 500 nm. Comparable thickness of all layers allows direct comparison of their properties. Final TFEL structure with screen-printed luminophore, dielectric, and silver layers was 35 µm thick.

4.1. Irradiance Measurements

Measurements of irradiance flux from all types of structures revealed significant dissimilarities (Figure 6). Emission form luminophores varies depending on different colors. While highest obtained irradiance for blue and blue-green is around 100 µW/, for orange luminophore it stays below 30 µW/. Moreover, elaborated elements with nanotube based TCLs have at most 60% of irradiance compared with ITO based structures. This is related to lower optical transmittance of composite layers, what we confirmed in the next experiment.

143094.fig.006
Figure 6: The relationships between irradiance and supply voltage amplitude for the frequency  Hz.
4.2. Transmittance Measurements

Transparent electrodes were measured with spectrophotometer to draw optical transmittance spectrum. As we can see in Figure 7, ITO has higher values or transmittance, but on uneven level, while CNT based electrodes have linear relation, with minor decay in lower wavelengths. Interestingly graphene based layers have wavelength independent value of transmittance, which is also known for monolayer graphene [45] and not for any other transparent electrodes.

143094.fig.007
Figure 7: The relationship between optical transmittance value of TCLs and wavelength.
4.3. Electromechanical Properties

Periodical mechanical stress test was performed on all transparent electrodes. Direct comparison of results is presented in Figure 8. Mechanical stress has relatively low influence on resistance of printed composite electrodes, while ITO samples did not survive the test. Sheet resistivity of CNT and GNP based electrodes remained almost unchanged after 75 000 bending cycles, while sheet resistivity of ITO layer increased more than 10 times just after 20 bends, and shortly after that noted higher resistivity than GNP + CNT layers.

143094.fig.008
Figure 8: Sheet resistivity changes during cyclical mechanical stress test for TCLs.

High mechanical endurance of composite electrodes emerges from carbon nanomaterials, strengthening structure of the layers. Applied mechanical stress does not have any effect on structure of CNTs or GNPs, and additionally very high length-to-diameter ratio of nanotubes and high area of graphene platelets prevent losing electrical contact between separate particles. Sputtered ITO with domain-based polycrystalline structure is less resilient to this type of stresses and is easily destroyed. Detailed observations of microstructure revealed cracked ITO structure, while there were no visible defects in layers with nanomaterials (Figure 9).

fig9
Figure 9: SEM micrographs of ITO and OWCNT layers after cyclical bending tests.
4.4. Accelerated Aging

We have not observed influence of the accelerated aging process on the irradiance, but we observed degradation of mechanical properties in ITO based structures. After 200 thermal cycles a delamination of luminophore layer from ITO was observed, for all kinds of used luminophores. Adhesion loss resulting in delamination is negative phenomena in case of elastic electronic structures that we have demonstrated in Figure 10. Structures with carbon based layers (OWCNT, GNP + OWCNT) did not exhibit such problems.

143094.fig.0010
Figure 10: TFEL structures on ITO (left) and OWCNTs (right) after thermal shock cycles.

5. Conclusions

Electroluminescent structures with carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets based transparent electrodes were obtained using screen-printing and spray-coating techniques. Although elaborated structures with nanomaterials have lower luminance than typically ITO based structures, they exhibit much higher resilience to mechanical factors and have stable parameters after aging process. Such composite layers sustain heavy mechanical stress or environmental factors and in that field overcome significantly ITO electrodes. While electrical and optical properties are still superior for ITO layers, optimization processes are on the way. Selection of nanotubes with higher length-to-diameter aspect ratio and thinner graphene platelets will improve optical properties of TCLs. Addition of dispersing agents for elaborated composite layers is goal to improve electrical properties. The results presented in this paper demonstrate that printed TCLs with carbon nanomaterials might be good substitute for ITO layers in elastic optoelectronic application. Presented results are very promising, but we need to improve electrical and optical properties of these new electronic materials.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by The Polish National Centre for Research and Development through GRAF-TECH/07 Project no. 513L 1142 0907 000.

References

  1. C. H. Hong, J. H. Shin, B. K. Ju et al., “Index-matched indium tin oxide electrodes for capacitive touch screen panel applications,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 7756–7759, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  2. S. Yong-Hee, C. Chung-Ki, and K. Han-Ki, “Resistance and transparency tunable Ag-inserted transparent InZnO films for capacitive touch screen panels,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 548, pp. 641–645, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  3. B. Han, K. Pei, Y. Huang et al., “Uniform self-forming metallic network as a high-performance transparent conductive electrode,” Advanced Materials, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 873–877, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  4. D. S. Jung, S. Lee, K. H. Lee et al., “A temperature-independent multi-walled carbon-nanotube sheet electrode for transparent touch screen,” in Proceedings of the 19th International Workshop on Active-Matrix Flatpanel Displays and Devices (AM-FPD '12), pp. 99–100, Kyoto, Japan, July 2012. View at Scopus
  5. K. Kim, K. Shin, J.-H. Han et al., “Deformable single wall carbon nanotube electrode for transparent tactile touch screen,” Electronics Letters, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 118–120, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Wang, X. Zhang, Q. Huang, C. Wei, and Y. Zhao, “Room temperature deposition of highly conductive and transparent hydrogen and tungsten co-doped ZnO films for thin film solar cells applications,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 110, pp. 94–97, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. G. Tait, B. J. Worfolk, S. A. Maloney et al., “Spray coated high-conductivity PEDOT:PSS transparent electrodes for stretchable and mechanically-robust organic solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 110, pp. 98–106, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. V. Salvatierra, C. E. Cava, L. S. Roman, and A. J. G. Zarbin, “ITO-free and flexible organic photovoltaic device based on high transparent and conductive polyaniline/carbon nanotube thin films,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 1490–1499, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y. H. Kim, C. Sachse, M. L. MacHala, C. May, L. Müller-Meskamp, and K. Leo, “Highly conductive PEDOT:PSS electrode with optimized solvent and thermal post-treatment for ITO-free organic solar cells,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1076–1081, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Sibiński, K. Znajdek, M. Słoma, and B. Guzowski, “Carbon nanotube transparent conductive layers for solar cells application,” Optica Applicata, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 375–381, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  11. T. Kim, Y. W. Kim, H. S. Lee, H. Kim, W. S. Yang, and K. S. Suh, “Uniformly interconnected silver-nanowire networks for transparent film heaters,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1250–1255, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Gupta, S. Walia, M. Hösel et al., “Solution processed large area fabrication of Ag patterns as electrodes for flexible heaters, electrochromics and organic solar cells,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 2, pp. 10930–10937, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. D. Kim, L. Zhu, D. Jeong et al., “Transparent flexible heater based on hybrid of carbon nanotubes and silver nanowires,” Carbon, vol. 63, pp. 530–536, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Hudayaa, J. H. Parka, W. Choia, and J. K. Leeb, “Characteristics of fluorine-doped tin oxide as a transparent heater on PET prepared by ECR-MOCVD,” ECS Transactions, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 161–166, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  15. H. Mingjun, G. Jiefeng, D. Yucheng et al., “Flexible transparent PES/silver nanowires/PET sandwich-structured film for high-efficiency electromagnetic interference shielding,” Langmuir, vol. 28, no. 18, pp. 7101–7106, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. S. C. Xu, B. Y. Man, S. Z. Jiang et al., “Flexible and transparent graphene-based loudspeakers,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 102, no. 15, Article ID 151902, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. W. Suk, K. Kirk, Y. Hao, N. A. Hall, and R. S. Ruoff, “Thermoacoustic sound generation from monolayer graphene for transparent and flexible sound sources,” Advanced Materials, vol. 24, no. 47, pp. 6342–6347, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Y. Shin, J. Y. Hong, and J. Jang, “Flexible and transparent graphene films as acoustic actuator electrodes using inkjet printing,” Chemical Communications, vol. 47, no. 30, pp. 8527–8529, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Minami, “Present status of transparent conducting oxide thin-film development for indium-tin-oxide (ITO) substitutes,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 516, no. 17, pp. 5822–5828, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. Y. Oh, M. C. Jeong, T. H. Moon et al., “Transparent conductive Al-doped ZnO films for liquid crystal displays,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 99, no. 12, Article ID 124505, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Pang, Y. Hernandez, X. Feng, and K. Müllen, “Graphene as transparent electrode material for organic electronics,” Advanced Materials, vol. 23, no. 25, pp. 2779–2795, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y. Kavanagh, M. J. Alam, and D. C. Cameron, “The characteristics of thin film electroluminescent displays produced using sol-gel produced tantalum pentoxide and zinc sulfide,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 447-448, pp. 85–89, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. G. Helander, Z. B. Wang, J. Qiu et al., “Chlorinated indium tin oxide electrodes with high work function for organic device compatibility,” Science, vol. 332, no. 6032, pp. 944–947, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K. Takehara, K. Takeda, K. Nagata et al., “Transparent electrode for UV light-emitting-diodes,” Physica Status Solidi (C), vol. 8, no. 7-8, pp. 2375–2377, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. Liu, Y. Li, and H. Zeng, “ZnO-based transparent conductive thin films: doping, performance, and processing,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2013, Article ID 196521, 9 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. Lee, W. K. Bae, I. Park, D. Y. Yoon, S. Lee, and C. Lee, “Transparent electrode with ZnO nanoparticles in tandem organic solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 365–368, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. N. M. Kiasari, J. Shen, B. Gholamkhass, S. Soltanian, and P. Servati, “Well-aligned zinc oxide nanowire arrays for transparent electrode applications,” in Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting on IEEE Photonic Society (PHO '11), pp. 561–562, October 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. I. S. Song, S. W. Heo, J. H. Lee, J. R. Haw, and D. K. Moon, “Study on the wet processable antimony tin oxide (ATO) transparent electrode for PLEDs,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 312–316, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. Luo, D. Bozyigit, V. Wood, and M. Niederberger, “High-quality transparent electrodes spin-cast from preformed antimony-doped tin oxide nanocrystals for thin film optoelectronics,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 25, no. 24, pp. 4901–4907, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  30. F. Chen, N. Li, Q. Shen, C. Wang, and L. Zhang, “Fabrication of transparent conducting ATO films using the ATO sintered targets by pulsed laser deposition,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 105, pp. 153–158, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. I. Moreno, N. Navascues, M. Arruebo, S. Irusta, and J. Santamaria, “Facile preparation of transparent and conductive polymer films based on silver nanowire/polycarbonate nanocomposites,” Nanotechnology, vol. 24, no. 27, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T. Feng, Y. Wang, K. Wang, M. Qian, Y. Chen, and Z. Sun, “A facile method for preparing transparent, conductive, and paper-like silver nanowire films,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2011, Article ID 935218, 5 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. J. Morfa, E. M. Akinoglu, J. Subbiah, M. Giersig, and P. Mulvaney, “Transparent metal electrodes from ordered nanosphere arrays,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 114, no. 5, Article ID 054502, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. M. Hamasha, T. Dhakal, K. Alzoubi et al., “Stability of ITO thin film on flexible substrate under thermal aging and thermal cycling conditions,” IEEE/OSA Journal of Display Technology, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 385–390, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. G. de Arco, Y. Zhang, C. W. Schlenker, K. Ryu, M. E. Thompson, and C. Zhou, “Continuous, highly flexible, and transparent graphene films by chemical vapor deposition for organic photovoltaics,” ACS Nano, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 2865–2873, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. Kalita, K. Wakita, M. Umeno, Y. Hayashi, and M. Tanemura, “Large-area CVD graphene as transparent electrode for efficient organic solar cells,” in Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC '12), pp. 3137–3141, June 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. X. Li, G. Zhang, X. Bai et al., “Highly conducting graphene sheets and Langmuir-Blodgett films,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 538–542, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. L. Gomez de Arco, Y. Zhang, C. W. Schlenker, K. Ryu, M. E. Thompson, and C. Zhou, “Continuous, highly flexible, and transparent graphene films by chemical vapor deposition for organic photovoltaics,” ACS Nano, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 2865–2873, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. Y. Choi, S. J. Kang, H. Kim, W. M. Choi, and S. Na, “Multilayer graphene films as transparent electrodes for organic photovoltaic devices,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 281–285, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. K. Kawano, R. Pacios, D. Poplavskyy, J. Nelson, D. D. C. Bradley, and J. R. Durrant, “Degradation of organic solar cells due to air exposure,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 90, no. 20, pp. 3520–3530, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. P. Verge, F. Vidal, P. Aubert et al., “Thermal ageing of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) semi-IPNs,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 3864–3870, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. Y. Zhu, W. Cai, R. D. Piner, A. Velamakanni, and R. S. Ruoff, “Transparent self-assembled films of reduced graphene oxide platelets,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 95, no. 10, Article ID 103104, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. A. Yu, I. Roes, A. Davies, and Z. Chen, “Ultrathin, transparent, and flexible graphene films for supercapacitor application,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 96, no. 25, Article ID 253105, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. Zhao, S. Pei, W. Ren, L. Gao, and H. Cheng, “Efficient preparation of large-area graphene oxide sheets for transparent conductive films,” ACS Nano, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 5245–5252, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. L. A. Falkovsky, “Optical properties of graphene,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 129, no. 1, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus