Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 208920, 17 pages
Research Article

Progress, Challenge, and Perspective of Bimetallic TiO2-Based Photocatalysts

Department of Chemical Technology, Gdansk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland

Received 17 March 2014; Accepted 28 April 2014; Published 11 June 2014

Academic Editor: Arash Dehghan Banadaki

Copyright © 2014 Anna Zielińska-Jurek. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Bimetallic TiO2-based photocatalysts have attracted considerable attention in recent years as a class of highly active catalysts and photocatalysts under both UV and Vis light irradiation. Bimetallic noble metal structures deposited on TiO2 possess the ability to absorb visible light, in a wide wavelength range (broad LSPR peak), and therefore reveal the highest level of activity as a result of utilization of a large amount of incident photons. On the other hand they can enhance the rate of trapping photoexcited electrons and inhibit the recombination process due to the capability of the storage of photoexcited electrons. Based on literature two groups of bimetallic photocatalysts were distinguished. The first group includes bimetallic TiO2 photocatalysts (BMOX), highly active under UV and Vis light irradiation in a variety of oxidation reactions, and the second group presents bimetallic photocatalysts (BMRED) exceptionally active in hydrogenation reactions. This review summarizes recent advances in the preparation and environmental application of bimetallic TiO2-based photocatalysts. Moreover, the effects of various parameters such as particle shape, size, amount of metals, and calcination on the photocatalytic activity of bimetallic TiO2-based photocatalysts are also discussed.

1. Introduction

Titanium (IV) oxide (TiO2) is one of the most important photocatalytic materials in the area of environmental purification, hydrogen generation, and CO2 photoconversion to methane and low hydrocarbons. The limitation in its application is resulting from low quantum yield (fast recombination of charge carriers: e/h+) and necessity to use UV irradiation, which may be overcome since modified titania often possesses higher activity and ability of working under visible light irradiation. Over the past decades physical, chemical, and photocatalytic properties of TiO2 were intensively investigated to enhance the efficiency of degradation of organic pollutants [17]. Among various organic and inorganic compounds used as dopants or surface modifiers, noble metal particles especially attracted attention, since they may enhance the transfer of photogenerated electrons extending the lifetime of charge carriers [8, 9]. Noble metal nanoparticles, such as gold, silver, platinum, and palladium, possess the ability to absorb visible light due to localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) [1012] and therefore may also activate wide bandgap semiconductors (e.g., TiO2) towards visible light.

Metallic nanoparticles, particularly these of silver, gold, and platinum, or a combination of these metals (Ag-Pt, Au-Pt, and Au-Ag) and various oxides (TiO2, SiO2) are used as templates for the creation of complex and ordered nanomaterials with tailored and tunable structural, optical, and surface properties [13].

Since the pioneering work of Haruta, Au clusters supported by oxides (Au/oxides) have perhaps become the most interesting systems in heterogeneous catalysis because of their unique catalytic properties at low temperatures for many reactions. Gold nanoparticles less than 5 nm in size are very active catalysts. However, large gold nanoparticles supported on metal oxide with diameter of about 50 nm and more exhibit photocatalytic activity for hydrogen production, environmental pollution degradation, and reduction of nitrogen oxides [11, 14].

Many reports on this subject using platinum cluster dispersions or nanoparticles have been published [1517]. Platinum is one of the most active metals for photocatalytic enhancement, which can produce the highest Schottky barrier among metals that facilitate electron capture and, therefore, hinders the recombination rate between electrons and holes [18, 19].

Although platinum is a very promising metal, which can increase TiO2 activity, it is more expensive than gold [20]. Certain solution is to use bimetallic structure of platinum with another metal, which can greatly enhance the photocatalytic performance, particularly with respect to activity and selectivity [21]. Bimetallic nanoparticles revealed unique catalytic, electronic, and optical properties distinct from those of the corresponding metallic particles as used in photocatalysis, photonics, electronics, optics, drug delivery, and others [2227]. The positive effect of metal deposits on TiO2 surface results from the improved separation of electrons and holes on the surface of the photocatalyst. Additionally, modification of TiO2 with noble metal nanoparticles (NPs) such as gold and silver, which exhibit plasmon absorption band at 560 nm (Au) and 410 nm (Ag), is beneficial, due to enabling the absorption of visible light in a wider range of wavelengths and thus with higher levels of activity [28]. Bimetallic NPs deposited on TiO2 are expected to display not only the combination of the properties associated with two distinct metals, but also the new properties due to synergy between two metals.

Recently, alloying or bimetallization of platinum with gold has been reported to improve the catalytic activity of platinum clusters for visible light-induced hydrogen generation and degradation of organic dyes or phenol [15, 29]. However, the improvement of photocatalytic activity of TiO2 modified with noble metal nanoparticles by bimetallization is observed not only between platinum and gold, but also between platinum and palladium [30, 31], palladium and gold [32, 33], platinum and copper [34], platinum and nickel [35], platinum and tin [36], platinum and iron [35], palladium and copper [37, 38], gold and silver [11, 39], and copper and silver [40].

Reports on preparation of Au/TiO2, Pt/TiO2, Ag/TiO2, and Cu/TiO2 nanocomposites with different morphological forms are progressively increasing with the focus on preparation of catalysts and photocatalysts modified with bimetallic nanoparticles of an alloy or core-shell structure. Several research targets on TiO2 responsive to visible light or to enhance the photocatalytic efficiency in oxidation and reduction processes were reported.

The number of papers pertaining to the photocatalytic activity of modified bimetallic NPs increases, as might be expected from bimetallic nanocomposites application and their activity and selectivity, see Figure 1.

Figure 1: Number of publications concerning preparation and properties of photocatalyst modified bimetallic nanoparticles over the years 2004–2014 (till March), based on database of the ScienceDirect, with search keywords being “bimetallic photocatalyst, bimetallic modified TiO2.”

Bimetallic nanoparticles of the same size, shape, and composition show significant differences in activity when configured into different architectures. Their structure depends on distribution modes of the two elements, which can be oriented (see Figure 2):(i)alloy or intermetallic structure,(ii)heterostructure,(iii)core-shell,(iv)multishell structure,and depends on the processing parameters, miscibility, and reduction kinetics of metal ions [41]. The alloy structure represents homogenous mixture of two metals (Figure 2(a)). The heterostructure results from independent nucleation and growth of two different metal crystals (Figure 2(b)). In the core-shell structure, one metal forms a core and the other metal surrounds it in the form of a shell (Figure 2(c)). In the multishell structure, layered stable or metastable alternating shells exist (Figure 2(d)).

Figure 2: Schematic illustration of bimetallic NPs with different structures (a) alloy, (b) heterostructure, (c) core-shell, and (d) multishell structure.

The structure of bimetallic nanoparticles deposited on TiO2 depends on the particle size, the preparation procedure, the type of support (its size, porosity, BET surface, and crystallinity), and the calcination temperature of the photocatalysts [11, 33].

Among all applications of bimetallic-based nanomaterials, the degradation of environmental pollutants, especially recalcitrant organic compounds, is attracting considerable attention. From among 180 papers identified in the Science Direct database (Figure 1) referring to the catalytic activity of TiO2 modified bimetallic NPs published over the years 2004–2014 (till March), 93 articles were published during the last year (2013 to March of 2014). In most of them, the catalytic and photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in gas and liquid phases, hydrogen generation reactions, and the reaction mechanism on modified TiO2 nanoparticles were investigated.

This review focuses on three major research areas mentioned above, including crucial operating parameters such as the size of photocatalyst components, the amount of bimetallic NPs, and the extent of photocatalyst calcination.

2. The Importance of Charge Carriers in TiO2-Based Photocatalysis

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a semiconductor with a bandgap of 3.2 eV. The mechanism of heterogeneous photocatalytic oxidation processes has been discussed extensively in literature [4247]. The reduction and oxidation reactions make the foundation for photocatalytic hydrogen production and photocatalytic water/air purification. Generation of excited high energy states of electron and hole pairs occurs when TiO2 is irradiated with light of greater energy than the bandgap energy (wavelengths lower than 390 nm) as shown in Figure 3. An electron is excited () from the valence band to the conduction band, forming a positive hole () in the valence band. Hoffmann et al. [42] have found by laser flash photolysis studies that the characteristic time scale for this charge-carrier generation reaction is of the order of femtoseconds (fs). The charge carriers generated migrate on the TiO2 surface and react with electron acceptor or electron donor. An important reaction that competes with the charge-carrier trapping is the electron-hole recombination reaction, which can occur either at the surface states of TiO2 or in the core of semiconductor [48]. This is one of the most detrimental reactions in photocatalysis as it affects the interfacial charge transfer processes and hence the quantum efficiency of the photocatalytic process.

Figure 3: Schematic illustration of semiconductor excitation by bandgap illumination leading to the creation of “electrons” in the conduction band and “holes” in the valance band.

3. TiO2 Modification Using Monometallic or Bimetallic Nanoparticles

Attempts to employ semiconductor-metal composite nanoparticles have been made to improve the charge separation efficiency. The synergy of noble metals and semiconductor photocatalysts brings in significant changes to many aspects of photocatalysis. An increase of activity under Vis light after modification of titania with plasmonic nanoparticles such as gold, silver, platinum, and palladium results from additional metal impact on the mechanism of electron transfer. The photons are absorbed by metallic particles through their localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) excitation [11, 49], see Figure 4. Surface plasmons of a metal are collective excitations of electrons in the conduction band and they dominate the electromagnetic responses of the metallic structure of dimensions in the order of the plasmon resonance wavelength. The surface plasmon resonance of metallic nanoparticles occurs when electromagnetic field interacts with conduction band electrons and induces the coherent oscillation of electrons. The charge oscillations of noble metals at the surface take place at optical frequencies, which depend on the dielectric constant of the material at metal surface. As shown in Figure 5(a) the electron is transferred from plasmonically excited noble metal (Ag, Au) to conduction band of titania. Another important feature is the formation of Schottky junction when noble metal nanoparticles have direct contact with the semiconductor.

Figure 4: Localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) of noble metal (Ag, Au) nanoparticles, a collective electron density oscillation caused by the electric field component of incoming light.
Figure 5: Schematic illustration of TiO2 modified monometallic NPs mechanism of organic pollutants degradation under Vis (a) and UV light irradiation (b).

The enhancement in reactivity was first observed for water splitting using the Pt/TiO2 system [50, 51]. Under UV irradiation noble metal nanoparticles deposited on TiO2 enhance transfer of photogenerated electrons prolonging lifetime of the charge carriers (see Figure 5(b)). Metals (such as Pt, Au, and Ag) and the semiconductor (TiO2) have different Fermi level. Electron migration from TiO2 to the metallic nanoparticle occurs until two Fermi levels are aligned, since the metal has a work function () greater than that of TiO2 (). The electrical contact resulted in a space charge layer, the Schottky barrier, which trapped electrons and suppressed electron-hole recombination [9]. Surface of metal acquires an excess negative charge, while TiO2 exhibits an excess positive charge as a result of electron migration from the barrier region. The height of the barrier () makes the difference between the TiO2 conduction band and metal Fermi level. Electrons drawn across this barrier leave additional positive holes in TiO2 matrix capable of oxidizing more organic species.

On the other hand, Anpo and Takeuchi [52] observed the electron transfer from TiO2 to Pt particles, using electron spin resonance (ESR) analysis. It was found that Ti3+ signals increased with irradiation time, while loading of Pt reduced the amount of Ti3+. They found that accumulated electrons on platinum particles can be transferred to protons adsorbed on the surface, reducing the protons to hydrogen molecules. Therefore, noble metals with suitable work function can enhance electron transfer, leading to higher photocatalytic activity [52].

For TiO2 photocatalysts modified with bimetallic NPs the mechanism of photocatalyst excitation depends on bimetallic nanoparticles structure. Based on literature and our own work we distinguish two groups of the bimetallic photocatalysts. The first group includes bimetallic TiO2 photocatalysts (Ag-Au, Ag-Pt, Ag-Cu, Pt-Cu, Pt-Pd, and Au-Cu) (BMOX) highly active under UV and Vis light irradiation in a variety of oxidation reactions. The second group is bimetallic (Au-Pt, Au-Pd, Au-Rh, Au-Ni, Au-Co, and Pt-Ru) modified TiO2 photocatalysts (BMRED) exceptionally active in hydrogenation reactions.

For alloy structure in oxidation processes the mechanism is similar to the excitation mechanism of monometallic NPs deposited on TiO2 as shown in Figure 6(a).

Figure 6: Schematic illustration of activation mechanism of TiO2 modified bimetallic NPs with alloy (a) and core-shell structure (b).

It is well known that the work function of metal decreases by alloying of other metal components with a lower work function. This suggests that alloying of other metal with Pt would decrease the work function of Pt nanoparticles. This may decrease conduction band (B) and promote efficient transfer from nanoparticles to anatase. Shiraishi et al. reported that alloy Pt-Cu particles on anatase surface activated efficiently transfer of to anatase. This enhances the reduction of O2 by , resulting in enhanced aerobic oxidation [53]. The enhanced transfer from the alloy particles to anatase was confirmed by electron spin resonance (ESR) analysis of the photocatalysts. It was found that the visible light irradiation of the sample creates strong signals assigned to superoxide anion stabilized on TiO2 surface. It was concluded that the transfer of to anatase was more efficient for Pt-Cu/TiO2 than for the monometallic Pt nanoparticles deposited on TiO2 surface [53]. Cu alloying with Pt decreases the work function of nanoparticles and decreases the height of Schottky barrier created at the nanoparticle/anatase heterojunction. This promotes efficient electron transfer from the photoactivated nanoparticles to anatase, resulting in enhanced photocatalytic activity. The Pt-Cu alloy photocatalyst is successfully activated by sunlight and enables efficient and selective aerobic oxidation of alcohols at ambient temperature.

The promoting effect of bimetal is attributed to either the improved spatial charge separation in TiO2 semiconductor or charge carrier transfer from metal NPs to conduction band of TiO2. Based on catalytic, optical, and photocatalytic properties the synergy between two metals in bimetallic system is also related to the electronic and geometric effects. A bimetallic structure formed by metals with lower electronegativity and other metal with higher electronegativity seems to perform better activity in photocatalyzed oxidation reactions [54]. The second metal is much more subject to oxidation than the other, which is enriched on the surface and may form metal oxide patches or shells on the first metal surface. The less electronegative metal can participate directly in oxidation reactions by providing reactive oxygen.

Phase segregation for the combination of two metals may occur upon treatment in an oxidizing atmosphere in either reaction or preparation process, as was reported for Ag-Au/TiO2 nanocomposites [11, 39, 54]. In our own XPS analysis it was observed that silver as Ag2O and gold as Au° were the dominant surface forms for Ag-Au alloy-modified TiO2 nanoparticles [11]. The Ag-Au/TiO2 nanocomposites showed more significant visible light photoactivity compared to monometallic Ag/TiO2 and Au/TiO2 nanoparticles obtained using the same preparation procedure. Important results regarding bimetallic Ag-Au NPs deposited on TiO2 were reported by Kowalska et al. [55]. Ag-Au core-shell structure NPs on TiO2 were obtained by the photodeposition method. Silver nanoparticles were oxidized and formed a shell on gold-rich core, while bimetallic Ag-Au nanoparticles with core-shell structure showed enhanced recombination of charge carriers. Greater ability of charge generation at the interface of a bimetallic structure does not mean better photoactivity, since in the core-shell structure plasmonic electrons instead of being transferred from silver to CB (conduction band) of titania may sink in nearby gold NP and vice versa, as shown in Figure 6(b). Plasmonic metals can be excited at visible range wavelengths via d-to-sp band transitions, recombining upon relaxation; once there is a pair of metals the relaxation is expected to be more efficient due to larger available density of electronic states.

The hydrogenation reactions are generally catalyzed by the transition metals of group VIII of the periodic table. The improvement of photocatalytic reduction processes in the presence of bimetallic-based photocatalyst is related to the enhancement of the rate of trapping photoexcited electrons and inhibition of the recombination process due to the capability of the storage of photoexcited electrons by using bimetallic nanoparticles deposited on TiO2 surface. Gao et al. [56] found that bimetallic Ni-Cu nanoparticles on the semiconductor surface can separately trap photogenerated electrons and holes and prevent their combinations, thereby increasing their life and improving the efficiency of photocatalytic reactions [56]. Bowker et al. [57] observed enhanced photocatalytic activity, using Au-Pd random alloys on TiO2 due to improved rate of trapping photoexcited electrons and inhibited recombination due to the capability of storage of photoexcited electrons by using alloy metal nanoparticles. The photocatalytic activity and properties of the two groups of bimetallic photocatalysts (BMRED-TiO2) and (BMOX-TiO2) active in reduction and oxidation processes are discussed in detail in the next paragraphs.

4. Bimetallic (BMRED-TiO2) Photocatalysts for Reduction Processes

Although, platinum and gold nanoparticles deposited on TiO2 revealed the highest photocatalytic activity under Vis light irradiation, the combination of these two metals does not provide sufficient increase in photocatalytic activity in degradation of organic pollutants. For Au-Pt/TiO2 and Au-Pd/TiO2 most of literature data pertains to hydrogen generation reactions. Gallo et al. [58] reported preparation procedure for bimetallic Au-Pt/TiO2 photocatalysts in the process of hydrogen generation both under UV-A and simulated sunlight irradiation. Bimetallic-based photocatalysts were prepared by impregnation of nanosized amorphous TiO2 with metal precursors followed by oxidation and reduction treatments. The best photocatalytic performance was obtained for sample reduced at 500°C, containing bimetallic Au-Pt nanoparticles with diameters smaller than 2 nm deposited on TiO2 surface. It was found that the synergetic effect under simulated sunlight and the improved activity under visible light of Au-Pt/TiO2 NPs compared to monometallic Pt/TiO2 and Au/TiO2 were the result of the combination of four contributing aspects [58]:(i)the presence of Au surface plasmon band absorption at wavelengths 550–600 nm,(ii)the presence of bimetallic Au-Pt nanoparticles which ensures prompt hydrogen evolution as for Pt nanoparticles and is different from the less active Au-based catalysts,(iii)the low total metal loading which leaves a high fraction of TiO2 surface available for UV light absorption,(iv)containing both oxygen vacancies and Ti3+ sites.

A brief summary of recent publications on TiO2 photocatalysts modified with bimetallic nanoparticles used in reduction processes is provided in Table 1, in which one can observe that among (BMRED-TiO2) photocatalysts Au-based bimetallic TiO2 photocatalysts represent a significant and the most extensively studied group in a variety of catalytic and photocatalytic reactions. Many reports in literature focus on the effect of the preparation procedure and amount of metal on bimetallic structure and their effect on catalytic and photocatalytic activity. The structure of bimetallic NPs mainly depends on the nature of metals such as relative bond strengths, their surface energies, and atomic size [59]. Strong heteronuclear bonds between two different metallic species influence the formation of the alloy structure, while the strongest homonuclear bonds of one species form the core and the other metal forms the shell of the structure. Metal with lower surface energy tends to segregate on the surface of the other metal [59]. This effect is in particular described in literature for bimetallic structures of Au-Pd and Au-Pt NPs.

Table 1: Recent publications of TiO2 photocatalysts modified bimetallic nanoparticles used in reduction processes.

Edwards et al. [60] observed the effect of catalyst calcination and reduction on the optimum composition of Au-Pd modified TiO2 nanoparticles. Under heat treatment, smaller pure-Au particles sinter and combine with palladium forming large alloy particles [60]. Cybula et al. [33] observed a similar effect of the calcination temperature (from 350 to 700°C) and segregation of metals (Au, Pd) on TiO2 surface depending on the annealing temperature. Microscopic analysis revealed that for the sample calcinated at 350°C three main fractions of Au-Pd NPs could be distinguished: small particles in the range of 1 to 6 nm, anisotropic particles from 15 to 50 nm, and spherical ones with the diameter of about 50 nm. For the sample treated at 450°C particles smaller than 10 nm were not found. Au-Pd particles in the range from 10 to 50 nm remained spherical, while bigger ones (from 70 to 360 nm) had irregular shape. Calcination at 700°C resulted in bimodal distribution of 15–20 nm particles and 65–330 nm particles, both irregular, as shown in Figure 7. With respect to sample calcinated at 350°C, it could be observed that the core of bimetallic NPs was rich in gold, but the shell contained mostly palladium. Rising the calcination temperature from 350 to 700°C led to alloying of the metals and increased the size of nanoparticles [33]. The photoactivity of Au-Pd/TiO2 nanoparticles was studied in oxidation of phenol. Therefore, no spectacular synergistic effect of bimetallic Au-Pd NPs immobilized on TiO2 surface was observed. Regarding the effect of the calcination temperature for 0.5Pd_1.25Au_TiO2 sample, it was found that for UV-mediated photoactivity increasing the calcination temperature resulted in improvement of phenol degradation rate from 5.8 to 7.1 and 6.2 μmol·dm−3 min−1 for the photocatalyst calcinated at 350, 400, and 450°C, respectively. The highest photoactivity under UV light was observed for sample calcinated at 500°C. Annealing temperature of 700°C resulted in the drop of photoactivity to 5.7 μmol·dm−3 min−1. The visible light activity was suppressed for the samples treated at an elevated temperature. Thus, phenol degradation rate under visible light decreased from 3.8 and 3.4 μmol·dm−3 min−1 for the sample calcinated at 350 and 400°C, respectively, to 0.7 μmol·dm−3 min−1 after calcination at 700°C. Samples calcinated at 350 and 400°C had much higher activity than those calcinated at 450 and 700°C.

Figure 7: The effect of calcination temperature on the structure of Au/Pd bimetallic nanoparticles. (a) High resolution HAADF images with z-contrast for Au/Pd nanoparticles calcined at 350°C, 400°C, and 700°C. (b) The yellow circles show gold-rich areas (palladium gives a light contrast than gold as a lighter element) [33].

Previously reported inhibitory effect of a core-shell structure of bimetallic NPs immobilized on TiO2 photocatalysts on photoactivity under visible light irradiation in oxidation processes was not observed in the reduction processes. Moreover, the authors reported a promotional effect of a core-shell structure on photocatalytic activity in reaction of hydrogen generation.

Yu et al. [61] obtained Au-Pd alloy-modified TiO2 nanotube film by photodeposition of Au and Pd precursors on self-organized TiO2 nanotubes. The photoactivity of bimetallic photocatalysts was evaluated under reducing and oxidation conditions. Compared with TiO2 having immobilized mixture of Au and Pd monometallic nanoparticles, a synergistic effect was observed in photocatalytic hydrogen evolution when TiO2 was immobilized with Au-Pd bimetallic nanoparticles. In case of organophosphorus pesticide malathion, using Au-Pd comodified TiO2 nanotube film, higher photocatalytic degradation rate was observed for Au-Pd alloy NPs deposited on TiO2. The improvement of photocatalytic activity resulted from the presence of small metal clusters on TiO2, which promotes the separation of photogenerated charges, and thus more holes could be involved in the malathion oxidation reactions [61]. Whereas the oxidation processes require a high content of the second metal in the bimetallic structure for efficient degradation of organic pollutants, in hydrogen generation processes the basis metal (generally Au) acts as promotor of the other metal to prevent its poisoning by intermediates or byproducts. Therefore, in hydrogen generation only a small amount of the second metal is required for synergistic effect and improvement of photocatalytic activity of nanocomposites.

Mizukoshi et al. [32] reported the dependence of the nanostructure of Au-Pd NPs on photocatalytic activity of the Au-Pd/TiO2 nanoparticles obtained by ultrasonication. The effect of metal amount in bimetallic structure was investigated. The authors observed that the best photocatalytic performance of hydrogen generation could be attributed to sample containing 75 mol% of Pd and 25 mol% of Au in bimetallic core-shell structure. The average diameter of the particles was from 4 to 5 nm. In hydrogen generation process the core/shell immobilized photocatalyst exhibits the highest performance under Vis illumination, whereas the alloy-modified TiO2 sample exhibits the highest performance of the photocatalysts under UV irradiation. This effect could be explained based on palladium and gold efficiency in the reaction of hydrogen generation. It was observed that Pd produces better yields of hydrogen, and, indeed, the peak rate of the production (as a function of weight loading) is higher for palladium than for gold [32]. It was stated that bimetallic nanoparticles containing large amounts of Pd can accept electrons more effectively, as Pd has a larger work function than Au [62, 63]. However, it was observed that the amount of H2 did not increase linearly with the increase of Pd amount in the structure. On the other hand Lee et al. [64] reported that the alloy structure bimetallic photocatalysts had better photocatalytic efficiency in the reactions of organic compounds degradation. Au shell-Pd core/TiO2 18–25 nm NPs were obtained by thermal reduction of metal ions in citrate solution. The core-shell structure of bimetallic photocatalysts was less selective in the reaction of crotyl alcohol oxidation. The photoactivity increased with the increasing temperature, because elevated temperatures promote alloying of Au-Pd nanoparticles. The maximum oxidation rate occurred for 700°C annealed Au (shell)-Pd (core)/TiO2 NPs, which possess a surface alloy composition (Au40Pd60) [64].

Kait et al. [65] obtained copper-nickel bimetallic photocatalysts active in hydrogen production under visible light from glycerol-water mixture. It was found that bimetallic photocatalyst calcinated at 200°C for 1 h produced the highest amount of H2 similar to that produced by monometallic Cu/TiO2. The addition of a second metal enhanced the performance of Ni/TiO2 but was not so efficient compared to Cu/TiO2 NPs [65].

Xu et al. [34] reported preparation of Pt-Cu/TiO2 photocatalysts for nitrate reduction in water. Compared to monometallic Pt/TiO2 or Cu/TiO2, which were active in the reaction of nitrate reduction to ammonia or nitrite, the obtained bimetallic photocatalyst exhibited a considerable N2 selectivity for photocatalytic nitrate reduction. The photocatalytic activity and N2 selectivity of the supported bimetallic photocatalyst were dependent on TiO2 calcination temperature, Pt-Cu ratio, and metal loading amount. It was found that high Pt-Cu alloy dispersion as well as small metal particle size can be achieved over TiO2 calcinated at 300°C, which favors the selective nitrate reduction. Increasing Cu content in the bimetallic photocatalyst leads to the increased Cu content in Pt-Cu alloy and enhances nitrate reduction to nitrite, while high Cu content in Pt-Cu alloy is detrimental to N2 selectivity of the bimetallic photocatalysts [34].

Gao et al. [37] reported application of Ni-Cu/TiO2 in photocatalytic reduction of nitrates. It was found that bimetallic photocatalyst Ni-Cu/TiO2 showed higher photocatalytic activity compared with corresponding monometallic Ni/TiO2 and Cu/TiO2 nanoparticles. The photoactivity of Ni-Cu/TiO2 photocatalyst with 3 : 1 metal weight ratio and 4 wt.% total metal content was about 2.5 times and 3.5 times higher compared to monometallic Cu/TiO2 and Ni/TiO2 photocatalytic activity, respectively. Compared to other bimetallic photocatalysts, Cu-Ni/TiO2 nanoparticles revealed about 1.2 times and 2.6 times higher photoactivity than bimetallic photocatalysts Pt-Cu/TiO2 and Pd-Cu/TiO2 obtained using the same preparation procedure.

Oros-Ruiz et al. proposed [66] photocatalytic hydrogen production using Au-Cu2O/TiO2, Au-Ag2O/TiO2, and Au-NiO/TiO2 photocatalysts. It was found that the presence of gold and metal oxides like Cu2O or NiO as cocatalysts on TiO2 surface increased significantly the production of hydrogen by avoiding the recombination of the hole electron. The combination of Au-Cu2O/TiO2 and Au-NiO/TiO2 effectively increased hydrogen production (2064 and 1636 μmol·h−1·g−1) compared to Au/TiO2 (1204 μmol·h−1·g−1). On the other hand Au-Ag2O system had a detrimental effect compared to Au/TiO2 photocatalyst, inhibiting hydrogen production. Higher photoactivities of Au-Cu2O and Au-NiO nanoparticles deposited on TiO2 were apparently caused by enhancement of the electron charge transfer from TiO2 to Au-MxOy systems and the effect of surface plasmon resonance of gold nanoparticles [66].

5. Bimetallic Photocatalysts (BMOX-TiO2) for Oxidation Reactions

The structure of bimetallic catalysts depends on the preparation conditions, miscibility, and kinetics of the reduction of metal ions. Silver and gold have almost identical lattice constants (0.408 for Au and 0.409 for Ag) and are completely miscible over the entire composition range, which leads to a strong tendency toward alloy formation [66]. Thus Ag-Au bimetallic NPs with homogenous composition can be expected.

It was previously reported by Zielińska-Jurek et al. [11] that bimetallic silver- and gold-modified TiO2 nanoparticles exhibited improved photocatalytic activity in the oxidation reactions under visible light irradiation, better than monometallic Ag and Au nanoparticles, respectively. Ag-Au/TiO2 samples obtained using microemulsion method show higher photodegradation rate in visible region than Ag/TiO2 and Au/TiO2 photocatalysts. Greater silver amount was more beneficial to the photocatalytic activity of the obtained Ag-Au/TiO2 nanoparticles than that of gold. XPS analysis of the surface layer indicated that both Au clusters and nanoparticles were produced at TiO2 surface. However, for the most active Ag-Au/TiO2 sample, the dominant surface form of silver was Ag2O and gold occurred in the form of Au° but the presence of metallic Ag° as well as gold in the form of Auδ+ and Auδ was also confirmed. Under UV irradiation silver acts as a promoter to provide reactive oxygen in variety oxidation reactions as well as facilitates electron-hole separation and promotes interfacial electron transfer. In addition, bimetallic Ag-Au alloy nanoparticles possess the ability to absorb visible light in a wide wavelength range (broad LSPR peak) and, therefore, reveal the highest level of activity as a result of utilization of a large amount of incident photons. The photoactivity efficiency of Ag-Au/TiO2 photocatalyst was measured during the reaction of phenol degradation under Vis light irradiation (λ > 420 nm). The sample modified with 1.5 mol% of Ag and 0.5 mol% of Au exhibited 3.0 and 2.0 times faster degradation rate (3.57 μmol·dm−3·min−1) compared to Au/TiO2 and Ag/TiO2 nanoparticles, respectively [11]. A brief summary of recent publications on TiO2 photocatalysts modified with bimetallic nanoparticles used in oxidation processes is provided in Table 2. Ji et al. [39] reported that the structure of bimetallic NPs on TiO2 depends on the preparation procedure. Bimetallic Ag-Au nanoparticles (NPs) with alloyed and core-shell structures were obtained at temperature (75°C) from gold and silver NPs precursors in aqueous solution. Based on microscopic and spectroscopic analyses they stated that both the digestive ripening and Ostwald ripening were responsible for the formation of alloy or core-shell structures during the heating process. The structure of bimetallic NPs depended on Ag and Au molar ratio. Higher Ag contribution increases silver shell on the surface of Ag-Au alloy core, while lower Ag amount leads to the formation of alloy particles [39]. Kowalska et al. [55] proposed two mechanisms for plasmonic titania photocatalysts under visible light irradiation: (1) charge carrier transfer (electron transfer from plasmonic metal NPs to CB of titania) and (2) energy transfer (from plasmonic NPs to titania). Basing on the obtained results for core/Au-shell/Ag structures immobilized on TiO2, which exhibited enhanced field at the interface between titania and metallic nanoparticles, it was stated that the electronic mechanism for plasmonic photocatalysts under visible light irradiation is responsible for the enhanced or reduced visible light activity. Recently, it was reported for TiO2 modified monometallic NPs that nanoparticles size and shape are critical to the photocatalytic activity [30, 67, 68].

Table 2: Recent publications of TiO2 photocatalysts modified bimetallic nanoparticles used in oxidation processes.

A series of Ag-Cu modified TiO2 photocatalysts were obtained using the microemulsion method [69]. As it was previously reported for Ag-Au/TiO2 photocatalysts microemulsion method allows obtaining monodisperse alloy NPs deposited on TiO2 surface. For Ag-Cu/TiO2 a maximum in the photocatalytic activity under visible light was observed for the sample containing 0.5 mol % of Cu and 1.5 mol% of Ag. Average rate of phenol decomposition was 2.41 μmol/min and it was higher than for Ag/TiO2 and Cu/TiO2 NPs. The photocatalytic activity increased with silver loading up to 4.5 mol% and then decreased. Silver presence was more beneficial for visible light activation of modified TiO2 photocatalysts than more copper amount. Hai et al. [70] observed similar relation as was previously described for the Ag-Cu/TiO2 system, regarding metal amount and composition in the bimetallic structure assessed for wastewater treatment. Modification with Cu leads to better enhancement in the photocatalytic properties compared to modification with Au. TRMC signals show that bimetallic nanoparticles are better electron scavengers than Cu and Au NPs [70].

Ou et al. [71] studied the effect of Au/TiO2 (2 wt.% Au), Cu/TiO2 (2 wt.% Cu), and Au-Cu/TiO2 (1 wt.% Au-1 wt.% Cu) catalysts on partial oxidation of methanol (POM) to produce H2. The antisintering effect in Au-Cu alloy-modified TiO2 NPs was observed. Copper nanoparticles acted as a stabilizer and prevented gold NPs from aggregation or sintering during calcination. The bimetallic Au-Cu/TiO2 catalysts showed higher activity in terms of methanol conversion and hydrogen selectivity than the monometallic Au/TiO2 and Cu/TiO2 catalysts. Bimetallic Au-Cu/TiO2 catalysts were more active and stable and exhibited better hydrogen selectivity with a smaller amount of CO compared to monometallic Au/TiO2 and Cu/TiO2 catalysts. The enhanced activity, selectivity, and stability of bimetallic catalysts are due to the Au-Cu interaction that creates smaller metal particles, which consequently stabilize the active component for POM to produce hydrogen. XPS analysis revealed that this interaction is caused by the redox properties of Cu, which leads to stabilization of active Auδ+ and also stabilizes Au particle size [71].

A considerable increase of the photocatalytic activity in the reaction of phenol degradation was observed for 1 to 5 nm NPs of Pt-Pd deposited on TiO2 [30]. The effect of the crystallite size of TiO2 anatase and Pt-Pd bimetallic nanoparticles led to observation that sample of Pt-Pd/ TiO2 with anatase crystallite size of about 30 nm and 8–15 nm bimetallic particles deposited on TiO2 was 2.3 times less photoactive than Pt-Pd alloy immobilized on TiO2 containing 5 to 9 nm Pt-Pd nanoparticles aggregated with smaller TiO2 (~9 nm) nanoparticles. The results indicate that the rate of phenol decomposition in the presence of Pt-Pd/TiO2 under Vis light is comparable to the data for commercial TiO2 photocatalysts exposed to UV light. Thus, remarkable step forward in visible light photocatalysis for Pt-Pd alloy NPs on TiO2 was reported [30]. The average degradation rate of 6.84 μmol·dm−3 min−1 for phenol was about 19 times greater than for pure TiO2 obtained using the same preparation procedure and about 4 times higher compared to Pd/TiO2. However, monometallic Pt/TiO2 photocatalyst revealed only slightly lower photodegradation rate of 6.20 μmol·dm−3 min−1. Thus other less expensive platinum-based bimetallic structures in photocatalytic processes need investigation.

Shiraishi et al. [31] reported preparation of Pt-Cu/TiO2 photocatalysts highly active for aerobic oxidation driven by visible light. The effect of alloy particle size on photocatalytic activity in the reaction of benzyl alcohol oxidation was investigated. The photocatalytic activity of the photocatalysts with larger alloy particles was much lower than that prepared at 673 K which contain alloy particles 2 to 6 nm of diameter. Bimetallic Pt-Au/anatase, Pt-Ag/anatase, Pt-Pd/anatase, and Au-Cu/anatase alloy particles, often used for aerobic oxidation, showed activity much lower than that of the Pt-Cu/anatase alloy.

6. Challenges and Prospects

Significant progress has been achieved in recent years in the field of heterogeneous photocatalysis, particularly in noble metal nanoparticles as surface modifiers, which enhanced photocatalytic activity in visible light. Alloying a parent metal with a second metal can lead to efficient charge separation by trapping or removing electrons from TiO2. Although significant progress has been made in the application of TiO2 modified bimetallic NPs the development of bimetallic is still an attractive research aim. The most challenging problems are expected physicochemical properties such as monosize, uniform size, and even distribution of metal nanoparticles over the photocatalyst support. The photocatalytic and optical properties of bimetallic modified TiO2 photocatalysts directly depend on the preparation procedure. Different preparation methods may result in different defect structures, surface morphology, and bimetallic NPs structure. Table 3 represents the bimetallic photocatalyst prepared via different preparation methods and their application for photocatalytic processes. Most of TiO2 modified bimetallic NPs reported in literature were prepared by the coprecipitation and impregnation method. However, most commonly used inexpensive methods allow to obtain metallic NPs with particles size from 5 to10 nm. It is well known that smaller monodispersed silver nanoparticles ranging from 5 to 10 nm exhibit the best photocatalytic and antimicrobial activity. Recently it was also reported that fine platinum nanoparticles in the size range 0.8 to 2 nm revealed the highest activity under visible light irradiation among all monometallic plasmonic nanoparticles. Therefore, preparation of monodisperse and very small monometallic and bimetallic NPs is a very important task. Another challenge regarding bimetallic modified TiO2 is preparation of bimetallic-based nanomaterials with a well-controlled shape [72]. It was reported that the shape of bimetallic NPs determines surface atomic arrangement and the optical properties. In this regard, nanoarchitecture arrangement (shape and size of metals) as well as the selection of noble metal and titania form may allow to prepare photoactive catalysts under overall solar spectrum. A photocatalyst with very high efficiency is not practical if the cost of its modification with metals is too high.

Table 3: Recent publications of preparation of bimetallic photocatalysts and their application in reduction and oxidation processes.

Although platinum is a very promising catalyst which can increase TiO2 activity its amount in the photocatalyst need to be lowered by orders of magnitude to keep it economical. The presence of more abundant second metal could contribute to decreasing the overall costs. Therefore, more research is needed to identify low-cost metals with acceptable enhancement of photocatalytic activity.

Recently, preparation of Pt-Fe or Pt-Co nanoparticles [73, 74] for catalytic processes was reported. Moreover, preparation of Pt-shell and Co (Fe)-core NPs with fine particle size allows to enhance charge separation and facilitates separation and recycling of the photocatalyst. Hsieh et al. [35] reported preparation of bimetallic Pt-M (M = Fe, Co, and Ni) catalysts active in electrooxidation of methanol, using oxidized CNTs as the catalyst support. The particle size of Pt-Co NPs was within 5 to 10 nm. The Pt-Co/CNT catalyst exhibited the best electrochemical activity, CO tolerance, and long-term cycle ability [35]. Chen et al. [75] obtained Fe-Pt nanoparticles with controlled composition and the particle size below 9 nm. The size of the particles was controlled by the molar ratio of stabilizers to platinum acetylacetonate and the heating conditions. In the first step of particle formation mechanism Pt-rich nuclei were formed by reduction of platinum acetylacetonate. In the next step more Fe atoms coat over the existing Pt-rich nuclei, forming larger clusters. Exposition of clusters to the air leads to the formation of Pt-rich Fe-Pt/Fe3O4 followed by heating the clusters to 300°C, which leads to atomic diffusion and formation of fcc-structured Fe-Pt nanoparticles [75].

Another embodiment in the preparation of active photocatalysts under visible light may be combination of large plasmonic particles of gold or palladium with fine (1 to 2 nm) particles of platinum, silver, or copper which allows to absorb light in a wider wavelengths range.

Summarizing, although intensive development has led to preparation of highly active bimetallic photocatalysts in the reactions, the number of papers dealing with bimetallic NPs applications in catalysis is still greater than the number of publications in the area of photocatalysis. Many aspects are not fully covered yet, particularly a low-cost preparation methods, the control of particle size, and increased absorption of visible light which seems to be crucial for technological application of photocatalysts.

Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This research was financially supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Grant Iuventus Plus no. IP2011063971). Comments and corrections made by Professor Jan Hupka from Gdansk University of Technology are gratefully acknowledged.


  1. A. Fujishima and X. Zhang, “Titanium dioxide photocatalysis: present situation and future approaches,” Comptes Rendus Chimie, vol. 9, no. 5-6, pp. 750–760, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Chatterjee and A. Mahata, “Demineralization of organic pollutants on the dye modified TiO2 semiconductor particulate system using visible light,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 119–125, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Z. Zhao and Q. Liu, “Effects of lanthanide doping on electronic structures and optical properties of anatase TiO2 from density functional theory calculations,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 41, no. 8, Article ID 085417, 10 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Asahi, T. Morikawa, T. Ohwaki, K. Aoki, and Y. Taga, “Visible-light photocatalysis in nitrogen-doped titanium oxides,” Science, vol. 293, no. 5528, pp. 269–271, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Ohno, T. Mitsui, and M. Matsumura, “Photocatalytic activity of S-doped TiO2 photocatalyst under visible light,” Chemistry Letters, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 364–365, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. S. Sonawane, B. B. Kale, and M. K. Dongare, “Preparation and photo-catalytic activity of Fe-TiO2 thin films prepared by sol-gel dip coating,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 52–57, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Ikeda, N. Sugiyama, B. Pal et al., “Photocatalytic activity of transition-metal-loaded titanium(IV) oxide powders suspended in aqueous solutions: correlation with electron-hole recombination kinetics,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 267–273, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. Kowalska, S. Rau, and B. Ohtani, “Plasmonic titania photocatalysts active under UV and visible light irradiation: influence of gold amount, size and shape,” Journal of Nanotechnology, vol. 2012, Article ID 361853, 11 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. A. L. Linsebigler, G. Lu, and J. T. Yates Jr., “Photocatalysis on TiO2 surfaces: principles, mechanisms, and selected results,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 735–758, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Langhammer, Z. Yuan, I. Zorić, and B. Kasemo, “Plasmonic properties of supported Pt and Pd nanostructures,” Nano Letters, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 833–838, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Zielińska-Jurek, E. Kowalska, J. W. Sobczak, W. Lisowski, B. Ohtani, and A. Zaleska, “Preparation and characterization of monometallic (Au) and bimetallic (Ag/Au) modified-titania photocatalysts activated by visible light,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 101, no. 3-4, pp. 504–514, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. Pakizeh, C. Langhammer, I. Zorić, P. Apell, and M. Käll, “Intrinsic fano interference of localized plasmons in Pd nanoparticles,” Nano Letters, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 882–886, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. E. Hunyadi Murph, K. J. Heroux, C. E. Turick, and D. Thomas, “Metallic and hybrid nanostructures: fundamentals and applications,” Nanotechnology, vol. 4, pp. 387–427, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Ayati, A. Ahmadpour, F. F. Bamoharram, B. Tanhaei, M. Manttari, and M. Sillanpaa, “A review on catalytic applications of Au/TiO2 nanoparticles in the removal of water pollutant,” Chemosphere, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. E. Kowalska, H. Remita, C. Colbeau-Justin, J. Hupka, and J. Belloni, “Modification of titanium dioxide with platinum ions and clusters: application in photocatalysis,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 1124–1131, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. Zhang, H. He, and K.-I. Tanaka, “Catalytic performance and mechanism of a Pt/TiO2 catalyst for the oxidation of formaldehyde at room temperature,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 65, no. 1-2, pp. 37–43, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. F. B. Li and X. Z. Li, “The enhancement of photodegradation efficiency using Pt–TiO2 catalyst,” Chemosphere, vol. 8, pp. 1103–1111, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. H.-W. Chen, Y. Ku, and Y.-L. Kuo, “Effect of Pt/TiO2 characteristics on temporal behavior of o-cresol decomposition by visible light-induced photocatalysis,” Water Research, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 2069–2078, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Zielińska-Jurek and A. Zaleska, “Ag/Pt-modified TiO2 nanoparticles for toluene photooxidation in the gas phase,” Catalysis Today, vol. 230, pp. 104–111, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. G. Guisbiers, G. Abudukelimu, and D. Hourlier, “Size-dependent catalytic and melting properties of platinum-palladium nanoparticles,” Nanoscale Research Letters, vol. 6, article 396, pp. 1–5, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. Liu, F. Ye, Q. Yao et al., “Stellated Ag-Pt bimetallic nanoparticles: an effective platform for catalytic activity tuning,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, Article 3969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. W. Fritzsche and T. A. Taton, “Metal nanoparticles as labels for heterogeneous, chip-based DNA detection,” Nanotechnology, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. R63–R73, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Hu, J. Chen, Z. Y. Li et al., “Gold nanostructures: engineering their plasmonic properties for biomedical applications,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 35, pp. 1084–1094, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. S. Pillai, K. R. Catchpole, T. Trupke, and M. A. Green, “Surface plasmon enhanced silicon solar cells,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 101, no. 9, Article ID 093105, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. Narayanan and M. A. El-Sayed, “Catalysis with transition metal nanoparticles in colloidal solution: nanoparticle shape dependence and stability,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 26, pp. 12663–12676, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. W. L. Barnes, A. Dereux, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Surface plasmon subwavelength optics,” Nature, vol. 424, no. 6950, pp. 824–830, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. A. Garcia, “Surface plasmons in metallic nanoparticles: fundamentals and applications,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 45, no. 38, Article ID 389501, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. E. Kowalska, O. O. P. Mahaney, R. Abe, and B. Ohtani, “Visible-light-induced photocatalysis through surface plasmon excitation of gold on titania surfaces,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 2344–2355, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. N. Toshima and K. Hirakawa, “Polymer-protected Pt/Ru source bimetallic cluster catalysts for visible-light-induced hydrogen generation from water and electron transfer dynamics,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 121-122, pp. 534–537, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. A. Zielińska-Jurek and J. Hupka, “Preparation and characterization of Pt/Pd-modified titanium dioxide nanoparticles for visible light irradiation,” Catalysis Today, vol. 230, pp. 181–187, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. Y. Shiraishi, Y. Takeda, Y. Sugano, S. Ichikawa, S. Tanaka, and T. Hirai, “Highly efficient photocatalytic dehalogenation of organic halides on TiO2 loaded with bimetallic Pd-Pt alloy nanoparticles,” Chemical Communications, vol. 47, no. 27, pp. 7863–7865, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Y. Mizukoshi, K. Sato, T. J. Konno, and N. Masahashi, “Dependence of photocatalytic activities upon the structures of Au/Pd bimetallic nanoparticles immobilized on TiO2 surface,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 94, no. 3-4, pp. 248–253, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. Cybula, J. B. Priebe, M. Pohl et al., “The effect of calcination temperature on structure and photocatalytic properties of Au/Pd nanoparticles supported on TiO2,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 152-153, pp. 202–211, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. L. Li, Z. Xu, F. Liu et al., “Photocatalytic nitrate reduction over Pt–Cu/TiO2 catalysts with benzene as hole scavenger,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 212, pp. 113–121, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. C.-T. Hsieh and J.-Y. Lin, “Fabrication of bimetallic Pt-M (M = Fe, Co, and Ni) nanoparticle/carbon nanotube electrocatalysts for direct methanol fuel cells,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 188, no. 2, pp. 347–352, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. R. Rautio, P. Mäki-Arvela, A. Aho, K. Eränen, and K. Kordas, “Chemoselective hydrogenation of citral by Pt and Pt-Sn catalysts supported on TiO2 nanoparticles and nanowires,” Catalysis Today, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. W. Gao, R. Jin, J. Chen et al., “Titania-supported bimetallic catalysts for photocatalytic reduction of nitrate,” Catalysis Today, vol. 90, no. 3-4, pp. 331–336, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Bae, J. Jung, and W. Lee, “The effect of pH and zwitterionic buffers on catalytic nitrate reduction by TiO2-supported bimetallic catalyst,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 232, pp. 327–337, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. Y. Ji, S. Yanga, S. Guob, X. Songa, B. Dingb, and Z. Yang, “Bimetallic Ag/Au nanoparticles: a low temperature ripening strategy in aqueous solution,” Colloids and Surfaces A, vol. 372, pp. 204–209, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. M. Chen and D. W. Goodman, “Promotional effects of Au in Pd-Au catalysts for vinyl acetate synthesis,” Chinese Journal of Catalysis, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1178–1186, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. Zielińska-Jurek, J. Reszczyńska, E. Grabowska, and A. Zaleska, “Nanoparticles preparation using microemulsion systems,” in Microemulsions—An Introduction to Properties and Applications, R. Najjar, Ed., InTech, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Choi, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 69–96, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. O. Legrini, E. Oliveros, and A. M. Braun, “Photochemical processes for water treatment,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 671–698, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. P. V. Kamat, “Meeting the clean energy demand: nanostructure architectures for solar energy conversion,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 7, pp. 2834–2860, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. R. W. Matthews and S. R. McEvoy, “Photocatalytic degradation of phenol in the presence of near-UV illuminated titanium dioxide,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 64, pp. 231–246, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. C. S. Turchi and D. F. Ollis, “Photocatalytic degradation of organic water contaminants: mechanisms involving hydroxyl radical attack,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 178–192, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. Fujishima, T. N. Rao, and D. A. Tryk, “Titanium dioxide photocatalysis,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C, vol. 1, pp. 1–21, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. R. Vinu and G. Madras, “Renewable energy via photocatalysis,” Current Organic Chemistry, vol. 17, pp. 2538–2558, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. X. Zhang, Y. L. Chen, R. S. Liu, and D. P. Tsai, “Plasmonic photocatalysis,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 76, no. 4, Article ID 046401, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. S. Sato and J. M. White, “Photodecomposition of water over Pt/TiO2 catalysts,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 72, pp. 83–86, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. A. Fujishima and K. Honda, “Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode,” Nature, vol. 238, no. 5358, pp. 37–38, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. Anpo and M. Takeuchi, “The design and development of highly reactive titanium oxide photocatalysts operating under visible light irradiation,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 216, no. 1-2, pp. 505–516, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. Y. Shiraishi, H. Sakamoto, Y. Sugano, S. Ichikawa, and T. Hirai, “Pt–Cu bimetallic alloy nanoparticles supported on anatase TiO2: highly active catalysts for aerobic oxidation driven by visible light,” ACS Catalysis, vol. 7, pp. 9287–9297, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  54. C. Nwosu, “An electronegativity approach to catalytic performance,” Journal of Technical Science and Technologies, vol. 1, pp. 25–28, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  55. E. Kowalska, M. Janczarek, L. Rosa, S. Juodkazis, and B. Ohtani, “Mono- and bi-metallic plasmonic photocatalysts for degradation of organic compounds under UV and visible light irradiation,” Catalysis Today, vol. 230, pp. 131–137, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. W. Gao, J. Chen, X. Guan, R. Jin, F. Zhang, and N. Guan, “Catalytic reduction of nitrite ions in drinking water over Pd-Cu/TiO2 bimetallic catalyst,” Catalysis Today, vol. 93-95, pp. 333–339, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. M. Bowker, C. Morton, J. Kennedy et al., “Hydrogen production by photoreforming of biofuels using Au, Pd and Au-Pd/TiO2 photocatalysts,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 310, pp. 10–15, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. A. Gallo, M. Marelli, R. Psaro et al., “Bimetallic Au–Pt/TiO2 photocatalysts active under UV-A and simulated sunlight for H2 production from ethanol,” Green Chemistry, vol. 14, pp. 330–333, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. W.-J. Liu, T.-T. Qian, and H. Jiang, “Bimetallic Fe nanoparticles: recent advances in synthesis and application in catalytic elimination of environmental pollutants,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 236, pp. 448–463, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. J. K. Edwards, B. E. Solsona, P. Landon et al., “Direct synthesis of hydrogen peroxide from H2 and O2 using TiO2-supported Au-Pd catalysts,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 236, no. 1, pp. 69–79, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. H. Yu, X. Wang, H. Sun, and M. Huo, “Photocatalytic degradation of malathion in aqueous solution using an Au-Pd-TiO2 nanotube film,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 184, no. 1–3, pp. 753–758, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. X. Wang, J. C. Yu, H. Y. Yip, L. Wu, P. K. Wong, and S. Y. Lai, “A mesoporous Pt/TiO2 nanoarchitecture with catalytic and photocatalytic functions,” Chemistry—A European Journal, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2997–3004, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. H. B. Michaelson, “The work function of the elements and its periodicity,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 4729–4733, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. A. F. Lee, C. V. Ellis, K. Wilson, and N. S. Hondow, “In situ studies of titania-supported Au shell-Pd core nanoparticles for the selective aerobic oxidation of crotyl alcohol,” Catalysis Today, vol. 157, no. 1–4, pp. 243–249, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. C. F. Kait, E. Nurlaela, and B. K. Dutta, “Solar hydrogen from glycerol-water mixture,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Environment, Energy, Ecosystems and Development, pp. 48–52, 2013.
  66. S. Oros-Ruiz, R. Zanella, S. E. Collins, A. Hernández-Gordillo, and R. Gómez, “Photocatalytic hydrogen production by Au–MxOy (M=Ag, Cu, Ni) catalysts supported on TiO2,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 47, pp. 1–6, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. S. Devarajan, B. Vimalan, and S. Sampath, “Phase transfer of Au-Ag alloy nanoparticles from aqueous medium to an organic solvent: effect of aging of surfactant on the formation of Ag-rich alloy compositions,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 278, no. 1, pp. 126–132, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. Zielińska A, E. Kowalska, J. W. Sobczak et al., “Silver-doped TiO2 prepared by microemulsion method: surface properties, bio- and photoactivity,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 72, pp. 309–318, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. A. Zielińska-Jurek, M. Walicka, A. Tadajewska, I. Łacka, M. Gazda, and A. Zaleska, “Preparation of Ag/Cu-doped titanium (IV) oxide nanoparticles in w/o microemulsion,” Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing, vol. 45, pp. 113–126, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. Z. Hai, N. El Kolli, D. B. Uribe et al., “Modification of TiO2 by bimetallic Au-Cu nanoparticles for wastewater treatment,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 1, no. 36, pp. 10829–10835, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. T.-C. Ou, F.-W. Chang, and L. S. Roselin, “Production of hydrogen via partial oxidation of methanol over bimetallic Au–Cu/TiO2 catalysts,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 293, pp. 8–16, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. J. Gu, Y. W. Zhang, and F. (Feng) Tao, “Shape control of bimetallic nanocatalysts through well-designed colloidal chemistry approaches,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 41, pp. 8050–8065, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. S. Hu, J. Hou, L. Xiong, K. Weng, X. Ren, and Y. Luo, “Preparation and characterization of hydrophobic Pt-Fe catalysts with enhanced catalytic activities for interface hydrogen isotope separation,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 209-210, pp. 478–483, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. E. Tabor, K. Jíša, J. Nováková et al., “Role of Pt(0) in bimetallic (Pt,Fe)-FER catalysts in the N2O decomposition,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 165, pp. 40–47, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. M. Chen, J. P. Liu, and S. Sun, “One-step synthesis of FePt nanoparticles with tunable size,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 27, pp. 8394–8395, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. X.-Q. Gong, A. Selloni, O. Dulub, P. Jacobson, and U. Diebold, “Small Au and Pt clusters at the anatase TiO2(101) surface: behavior at terraces, steps, and surface oxygen vacancies,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 370–381, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. S. A. Ananthan, R. Suresh, K. Giribabu, R. Manigandan, and V. Narayanan, “TiO2 supported Pt based bimetallic nanocatalysts for selective hydrogenation of citral,” Chemical Science Transactions, vol. 2, pp. 111–122, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  78. V. Tiwari, J. Jiang, V. Sethi, and P. Biswas, “One-step synthesis of noble metal–titanium dioxide nanocomposites in a flame aerosol reactor,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 345, pp. 241–246, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. A. Sandoval, A. Aguilar, C. Louis, A. Traverse, and R. Zanella, “Bimetallic Au-Ag/TiO2 catalyst prepared by deposition-precipitation: high activity and stability in CO oxidation,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 281, no. 1, pp. 40–49, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. P. Wongwisate, S. Chavadej, E. Gulari, T. Sreethawong, and P. Rangsunvigit, “Effects of monometallic and bimetallic Au-Ag supported on sol-gel TiO2 on photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol and its intermediates,” Desalination, vol. 272, no. 1–3, pp. 154–163, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. A. Senthilraja, B. Subash, B. Krishnakumar, D. Rajamanickam, M. Swaminathan, and M. Shanthi, “Synthesis, characterization and catalytic activity of co-doped Ag–Au–ZnO for MB dye degradation under UV-A light,” Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, vol. 22, pp. 83–91, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. C. Angeles-Chavez, J. A. Toledo-Antonio, M. A. Cortes-Jacome, and C. Encarnacion-Gomez, “Structural characterization of Pt–Ir bimetallic clusters on TiO2 nanotubes prepared by simultaneous reduction,” Powder Technology, vol. 258, pp. 78–84, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. M. A. Vicerich, V. M. Benitez, C. Especel, F. Epron, and C. L. Pieck, “Influence of iridium content on the behavior of Pt-Ir/Al2O3 and Pt-Ir/TiO2 catalysts for selective ring opening of naphthenes,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 453, pp. 167–174, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. N. Riaz, F. K. Chong, B. K. Dutta, Z. B. Man, M. S. Khan, and E. Nurlaela, “Photodegradation of Orange II under visible light using Cu-Ni/TiO2: effect of calcination temperature,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 185-186, pp. 108–119, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. H. Cao, Z. Fan, G. Hou, Y. Tang, and G. Zheng, “Ball-flower-shaped Ni nanoparticles on Cu modified TiO2 nanotube arrays for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 125, pp. 275–281, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. P. Li, J. Liu, N. Nag, and P. A. Crozier, “In situ preparation of Ni-Cu/TiO2 bimetallic catalysts,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 262, no. 1, pp. 73–82, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus