Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2014, Article ID 291964, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/291964
Research Article

One-Pot Synthesis of Cu2O/Cu Self-Assembled Hollow Nanospheres with Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance

1Engineering Research Academy of Graphite New Materials, Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150027, China
2Department of Physics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150080, China

Received 16 December 2013; Revised 27 January 2014; Accepted 28 January 2014; Published 27 February 2014

Academic Editor: Chuanfei Guo

Copyright © 2014 Bo Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Cu2O/Cu hollow spheres are prepared using one-pot template-free solvent-thermal synthesis route with (CH3COO)2Cu·H2O as a precursor. With the reaction time increasing gradually from 2 h to 20 h, the morphology of the Cu2O/Cu evolves from nanoparticle to hollow nanosphere. The hollow structure is obtained when the cooling rate falls down to 0.7°C/min. And the content of Cu in the hollow spheres also can be easily controlled by adjusting the solvent-thermal synthesis time. Using photocatalytic degradation of phenol as the probe molecules under visible-light illumination, we have investigated the influence of hollow structure on the photocatalytic activity of Cu2O/Cu. The prepared hollow sphere Cu2O/Cu particles exhibited a higher photodegradation capability than nanoparticles and solid spheres. When the content of Cu lies in the range of 11–86 wt%, the samples exhibit higher photocatalytic performance, indicating that the Cu2O/Cu particles with hollow structure are promising candidates for the processing of pollutants.

1. Introduction

Semiconductor-based photocatalysts, activated by illumination at room temperature, are used for degradation of organic pollutants by redox reaction. The technique is environmentally clean and thus attracts more and more attention [1]. As is well known, the activity of a catalyst depends largely on geometry and morphology. Hollow/porous structures possess large area of surface and interface, which enhances not only the adsorption and desorption of products but also light harvesting, thereby improves the catalytic activity. Some existing works have demonstrated that morphology of materials can be well controlled in some important photocatalytic materials [25]. Various method have been developed to achieve these special structures, which involve hard templates or soft templates (PEG [6], CTAB [7]), as well as physical/chemical processes based on Kirkendall effect [8], Ostwald ripening [9], oriented attachment [10], and so forth. Although much progress has been made in the synthesis of hollow spheres, it remains a major challenge to develop a fast and facile solution route for the preparation of inorganic hollow nanostructures, especially one-pot synthesis nanocomposite with hollow structure.

As is well known, the maximum irradiation of sunlight lies in the visible range, and only photocatalysts with corresponding band gap could sufficiently use solar energy. The band gap of Cu2O is 2.0~2.2 eV, and the component elements are inexpensive and abundantly available, making it a promising candidate for photocatalysts. Numerous reports have shown the superior performance of Cu2O on solar energy conversion [11], photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants [12], and decomposition of water into H2 and O2 [13]. In recent years, various Cu2O hollow structures have been prepared by different methods. Qi and coworkers reported the one-pot synthesis of octahedral Cu2O nanocages via a catalytic solution route. Zeng et al. reported the preparation of hollow nanocubes of Cu2O via reductive self-assembly of CuO nanocrystals. In both synthetic processes, expensive and toxic organic solvents were used. Although many efforts have been devoted to synthesizing hollow Cu2O, few results were reported on the synthesis and photocatalytic property of Cu2O/Cu with hollow structure. We have previously reported that the composite of Cu2O/Cu has higher photocatalytic activity than simple-phase Cu2O [14]. It remains a great challenge to develop a feasible method for the synthesis of nanocomposite of Cu2O/Cu structures with hollow morphologies.

A simple and green one-pot in situ synthetic route for nanosized Cu2O/Cu hollow nanospheres is introduced here. The synthesis of Cu2O/Cu is developed with a template-free solvent-thermal route to control its morphology and phase composition. More importantly, the hollow structure of Cu2O/Cu can be obtained by adjusting the reaction conditions. A possible formation mechanism was proposed to account for the production of hollow structures. The effect of reaction time and cooling rate on its morphology was investigated. The adsorption and photocatalytic activity of samples were evaluated by the photocatalytic degradation of phenol under visible light illumination.

2. Experimental

2.1. Preparation of Cu2O/Cu Hollow Spheres

All the chemicals were analytical grade regents used without further purification. In a typical preparation, copper acetate ((CH3COO)2CuH2O, 0.02–0.05 M) was dissolved in a mixed organic solvent of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and ethanol. After the solution was stirred for 30 min, 35 mL of this transparent blue solvent was sealed in a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave with a capacity of 50 mL and heated at 200°C for 2–20 h in electric oven. After reaction, the precipitation was separated from the solution by centrifugation, then washed with alcohol for several times, and finally dried at 70°C for 5 h in a vacuum oven. The denotations of samples prepared at different condition are shown in Table 1.

tab1
Table 1: Experimental conditions, phase composition, and characterized parameters of different samples, where , , and are specific surface area, pore diameter, and pore volume, respectively.
2.2. Characterization

The samples were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) using a Rigaku 12 kW X-ray diffractometer with Curadiation (λ = 0.15418 nm). Their morphology and size distribution were inspected with a JEM-S4800 field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) operated at 15 Kv and a JEOL-2010 transmission electron microscope (TEM) working at 200 kV. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were obtained using a Quantachrome Autosorb-1 apparatus. Barret-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method was employed to determine the pore diameter () and pore volume (). The specific surface area () was calculated using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method.

2.3. Measurement of Adsorption and Photocatalytic Activity

The adsorption behavior and photocatalytic activity of the Cu2O/Cu were evaluated by the degradation of the solution of phenol at a concentration of 10 mg/L. 0.030 g Cu2O/Cu NCs powder was dispersed in a 50 mL probe molecular aqueous solution. Before illumination, the suspension was stirred in the dark for more than 120 min to achieve an adsorption/desorption equilibrium of organic molecules on the surface of Cu2O/Cu. The photocatalytic reaction was carried out at room temperature by using a 100 W tungsten lamp as a visible light source. At different time intervals during the experiment, 5 mL of solution was sampled each time for analysis. After centrifugation at 11000 rpm for 10 min, the absorbance of solution was measured using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (TU-1901).

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Structure and Morphology

Sample S4 (precursor concentration is 0.02 M, reaction time is 14 h, and cooling rate is 0.7°C/min) possesses the typical morphology of all, whose TEM images are shown in Figure 1(a). Hollow spherical nanoparticles are observed, with the diameter of 140~280 nm, whose shell is 30~50 nm in thickness. It can be seen from Figure 1(b) that this sample is composite materials, which are characterized by the two sets of diffraction peaks, that is, Cu2O (space group Pn3 m; a0 = 0.4252 nm; JCPDS 05-0667) and cubic Cu (space group Fm3m; a0 = 0.3613 nm; JCPDS 04-0836). The peaks located at 29.58°, 36.43°, 42.37°, 64.45°, and 73.66° can be, respectively, identified as Cu2O (110), (111), (200), (220), and (311) diffraction plane. And the peaks located at 43.34°, 50.53°, and 74.21° can be, respectively, identified as Cu (111), (200), and (220) diffraction plane.

fig1
Figure 1: (a) TEM images of sample S4; (b) XRD patterns of sample S4.

To study the formation process of the Cu2O hollow spheres, samples were collected at different reaction time and were characterized by the TEM analysis (Figure 2). When the solution at 200°C for 2 h, the system appears brown precipitate; these are nanoparticles that can be seen from Figure 2(a). Figure 2(b) is a TEM image of the sample collected after 4 h, showing that Cu2O nanoparticles aggregated to form loose spheres, whose diameter are approximately 140–280 nm and part of them are hollow structure. When the reaction time increases to 10 h, the spherical self-assembled internal nanoparticles are significantly decreased; hollow structure can be seen from Figure 2(c), a thin-wall hollow spherical structure was formed, which diameter is approximately 180 nm and the wall thickness is about 30 nm. When the reaction time is 20 h, the color of the sample is completely changed to dark purple. The corresponding TEM photograph is shown in Figure 2(d), and the hollow structure obtained exhibits no change in morphology. This time-dependent self-assembly allows selective synthesis of hollow mesoporous spheres by changing reaction time, which is of great importance for designing catalysts with high activity.

fig2
Figure 2: The effect of reaction time on the formation of Cu2O/Cu hollow nanospheres: (a) 2 h; (b) 4 h; (c) 10 h; and (d) 20 h.

In this experiment, the authors found that the cooling rate has great impact on the formation of hollow structure. Figure 3 shows the SEM of samples obtained at 200°C for 10 h with different cooling rate. Shown in the Figure 3(a) is the sample obtained when the stainless steel autoclave was quenched in ice water, the morphology of which is disorganized nanoparticles. Decreasing the cooling rate to 3°C/min (Figure 3(b)), the product exhibits spherical aggregated structure. When the cooling rate was decreased to 0.7°C/min, the hollow spheric structure with 140–280 nm diameter was formed, which could be indicated by the light and shade contrast as the arrow point inset Figure 3(c).

fig3
Figure 3: The cooling rate-dependent morphology: (a) quenched in ice water; (b) 3°C/min; and (c) 0.7°C/min.

Figure 4 illustrates the Schematic formation process of Cu2O/Cu hollow nanospheres. As indicated, the solid spheres are comprised of numerous smaller crystallites. Firstly, the nanocrystals formed and then driven by the minimization of the system energy; the small nanocrystals tend to aggregate together to form solid spherical groups. These aggregates exhibit various packing densities along the radial direction. With increasing reaction time, Ostwald ripening [9] then comes into effect; the particles with high surface energy move from the center to the surface. Voids in the cores of large aggregates gradually form and become bigger. The original driving force for this ripening is attributed to the existence of intrinsic density variations inside the starting solid aggregates.

291964.fig.004
Figure 4: Schematic illustration of the formation hollow spheric nanostructures.

Figure 5 shows the XRD patterns of a series of samples prepared with different reaction time at 200°C. For the S1, all diffraction peaks can be indexed to be cubic phase of Cu2O crystal (JCPDS number 05-0667). When the reaction time was prolonged from 6 h to 20 h, the samples (S2, S3, S4, and S5) were found to be composite materials of Cu2O and Cu. With increasing the reaction time, the relative intensity of Cu2O (1 1 1) peak increases, indicating the higher content of Cu2O in the NCs. (Table 1). With increasing precursor concentration, the relative intensity of Cu2O (1 1 1) peak increases, indicating the higher content of Cu2O in the nanocomposites. The mass fraction of Cu2O in the nanocomposites can be calculated using the relative ratio [15]: where and are the height of the characteristic diffraction peaks of Cu2O (111) and Cu (111) planes, respectively. As calculated from XRD results (Figure 5), the corresponding content of Cu increases from 0 wt% to 86 wt% when the time increases from 4 h (S1) to 20 h (S5). Thus, the reaction time plays a crucial role in forming different ratios of Cu2O to Cu in the composite.

291964.fig.005
Figure 5: Powder XRD patterns of hollow nanospheres synthesized with different reaction times: (S1) 4 h; (S2) 6 h; (S3) 10 h; (S4) 14 h; and (S5) 20 h.

Figure 6 shows the relationship between the morphology and the precursor concentration. Obviously, the concentration of precursor has a great effect on the morphology. At low precursor concentration of 0.02 M (S2, Figure 6(a)), hollow sphere is formed, whose diameter is approximately 140–280 nm. The contrast of light and shade can infer the possible hollow structure (the arrow inset Figure 6(b)). When the precursor concentration increases to 0.05 M, the diameter of microsphere increase to 2 μm, and the spheres become merged together. Therefore, when the precursor concentration changed, the products changed not only in size but also in morphology of the grain.

fig6
Figure 6: SEM images of Cu2O/Cu composites obtained in different precursor concentrations: (a) 0.02 M; (b) 0.05 M.
3.2. N2 Adsorption-Desorption

Figure 7 show the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm of S1 and S4 (S4 is representative for all the hollow spheric samples), and the two adsorption isotherms all exhibit type IV hysteresis, indicating S1 and S4 are porous structures. The corresponding parameters are listed in Table 1. The pore size of S1 (inset Figure 7(a)) ranges from 33 to 42 nm, which can be attributed to the aggregation of nanoparticles. But for S4 (inset Figure 7(b)), the pore size has shown the obvious bimodal pore size distribution, which is located in the microporous and mesoporous region, respectively, including the maximum probability diameter of 3.7-3.8 nm between the interior of the particle agglomeration hole and 17–40 nm agglomeration piled holes between particles.

fig7
Figure 7: N2 adsorption-desorption BET isotherms of samples S1 and S4. The inset shows the pore size distribution.
3.3. Photocatalytic Activity

Phenol is transparent to visible light and very hard to mineralize due to its resonance stability. The strong absorption peak at about 269 nm is selected to monitor the photocatalytic degradation process. With longer irradiation time, this characteristic peak becomes weaker and weaker, indicating the degradation of phenol. No new adsorption peaks appear and no obvious shift of the characteristic peak is observed, indicating the degradation of phenol.

In order to understand the hollow structure in enhancing the photocatalytic performance of Cu2O, pure Cu2O nanoparticles, nanospheres, and hollow nanospheres are prepared and the photocatalytic activity is studied. Shown in Figure 8 is the photocatalytic activity of Cu2O with different morphologies, which is characterized by the initial concentration () and the concentrations at different time interval (C). The sizes of Cu2O nanoparticle in the hollow spheres and nanospheres are approximately the same as the nanoparticles Cu2O. From Figure 8, we can see that without catalyst, phenol cannot be degraded under visible light irradiation, whereas it can be easily degraded with the presence of Cu2O photocatalysis. At an irradiation time of 120 min, 75% phenol is degraded with the presence of hollow spheric sample. On the contrary, the photocatalytic performance of nanoparticles and solid structure are relatively low; especially nanoparticles Cu2O, the degradation rate is only 23%. Compared to solid particles, hollow structures have large specific surface areas, the interior and exterior surfaces, which enhance not only the adsorption and desorption of products but also light harvesting, thereby improving the catalytic activity.

291964.fig.008
Figure 8: Relative concentration (C/C0) of phenol versus time under visible light irradiation with Cu2O nanoparticles, solid nanospheres, and hollow nanosphere as photocatalysts.

Figure 9 shows the photocatalytic performance of Cu2O/Cu hollow spheres, whose Cu contents are different. Among these samples, the performance of S1 is relatively low, while S3 exhibits the highest performance. As discussed above, S1 is the pure phase of Cu2O and the other samples (S2–5) are nanocomposites of Cu2O and Cu. The pure-phase semiconductor exhibits very low quantum efficiency due to the quick recombination of photoelectrons and holes [16]. According to the theory of metal/semiconductor heterostructure catalysis [1721], the photocatalytic activity of semiconductor-based heterostructure depends greatly on the concentration of heterostructure interface and defect, which promotes interfacial charge-transfer kinetics between the metal and semiconductor and improves the separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs, thus increasing photocatalytic activity [17]. In fact, a Schottky barrier was assumed to form at the Cu2O and Cu interface; Cu acts as an electron sink that reduces the recombination of photoinduced electrons and holes (2). However, Cu2O is known to absorb a relatively large amount of oxygen on the surface [22]. It has been proven that the electrons do accumulate on Cu particles, and the accumulation of electron on Cu will transfer to Cu2O and O2 will reduce O2 to (3), while the oxidize the H2O to form (4); finally, the organics have been degraded through the formation of (5) [2325]. The accumulation of electron on photocatalyst will increase the rate of recombination. In Cu2O/Cu, the interfaces between Cu and Cu2O act as the sites where rapid seperation of photogenerated electrons and holes occurs. On the other hand, very high content of Cu (S5, 86 wt%) does not favor high photocatalytic activity, since Cu becomes a recombination center for electrons and holes instead [26]. Therefore, the mass fraction of Cu in the nanocomposites also influences photocatalytic activity.

291964.fig.009
Figure 9: Relative concentration (C/C0) of phenol versus time under visible light irradiation with the presence of hollow spheric Cu2O/Cu NCs which have different Cu contents.

Consider

4. Conclusions

Hollow spheric Cu2O/Cu photocatalysts have been synthesized by following a one-pot solvent-thermal synthesis route without using any templates and additives. The reaction time and cooling rate have a strong effect on the formation of the hollow Cu2O/Cu nanospheres. The hollow spheric structure is formed at a reaction time in the range of 4 h to 20 h and low cooling rate 0.7°C/min. The content of Cu increases with increasing reaction time. As visible-light-driven photocatalysts, the hollow spheric Cu2O/Cu exhibit better photocatalytic performance than the nanoparticles and solid spheres. Our route offers an effective way to control the synthesis of Cu2O/Cu hollow spheres and may shed light on the design of simple route for one-pot synthesis of metal oxide nano-heterojunction, other well defined complex nanostructures.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research work is funded by the National Science and Technology Support Program of China (no. 2013BAE04B03 and no. 2013BAE04B02) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 10674034).

References

  1. M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Choi, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 69–96, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. M. Duan, Z. W. Quan, P. P. Yang, H. Wang, and J. Lin, “Shape-controlled synthesis of wurtzite ZnS microstructures under mild solvothermal condition,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 919–923, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. F. Guo, J. Zhang, M. Wang, Y. Tian, and Q. Liu, “Superstructures: a strategy to prepare wafer scale bismuth compound superstructures,” Small, vol. 9, no. 14, pp. 2394–2398, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  4. C. F. Guo, J. Zhang, Y. Tian, and Q. Liu, “A general strategy to superstructured networks and nested self-similar networks of bismuth compounds,” ACS Nano, vol. 6, pp. 8746–8752, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  5. C. F. Guo, S. Cao, J. Zhang et al., “Topotactic transformations of superstructures: from thin films to two-dimensional networks to nested two-dimensional networks,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 21, pp. 8211–8215, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Xu, D. Chen, X. Jiao, and K. Xue, “Nanosized Cu2O/PEG400 composite hollow spheres with mesoporous shells,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 44, pp. 16284–16289, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. Xu and W. Wang, “Template synthesis of multishelled Cu2O hollow spheres with a single-crystalline shell wall,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1489–1492, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. Goto, Y. Hanada, T. Ohno, and M. Matsumura, “Quantitative analysis of superoxide ion and hydrogen peroxide produced from molecular oxygen on photoirradiated TiO2 particles,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 225, no. 1, pp. 223–229, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. G. Yang and H. C. Zeng, “Preparation of hollow anatase TiO2 nanospheres via Ostwald ripening,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 11, pp. 3492–3495, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Li, M. H. Nielsen, J. R. I. Lee, C. Frandsen, J. F. Banfield, and J. J. de Yoreo, “Direction-specific interactions control crystal growth by oriented attachment,” Science, vol. 336, pp. 1014–1018, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  11. A. Paracchino, J. C. Brauer, J.-E. Moser, E. Thimsen, and M. Graetzel, “Synthesis and characterization of high-photoactivity electrodeposited Cu2O solar absorber by photoelectrochemistry and ultrafast spectroscopy,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 116, no. 13, pp. 7341–7350, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. Wua, W. Zhai, F. Sun, W. Chen, Z. Pan, and W. Li, “Morphology-controlled electrodeposition of Cu2O microcrystalline particle films for application in photocatalysis under sunlight,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 47, pp. 4026–4030, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  13. P. D. Tran, S. K. Batabyal, S. S. Pramana, J. Barber, L. H. Wong, and S. C. Loo, “A cuprous oxide-reduced graphene oxide (Cu2O-rGO) composite photocatalyst for hydrogen generation: employing rGO as an electron acceptor to enhance the photocatalytic activity and stability of Cu2O,” Nanoscale, vol. 4, pp. 3875–3878, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  14. B. Zhou, H. Wang, Z. Liu et al., “Enhanced photocatalytic activity of flowerlike Cu2O/Cu prepared using solvent-thermal route,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 847–852, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Chang, J. J. Teo, and H. C. Zeng, “Formation of colloidal CuO nanocrystallites and their spherical aggregation and reductive transformation to hollow Cu2O nanospheres,” Langmuir, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1074–1079, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. W. J. Foo, C. Zhang, and G. W. Ho, “Non-noble metal Cu-loaded TiO2 for enhanced photocatalytic H2 production,” Nanoscale, vol. 5, pp. 759–764, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  17. H. Zhu, M. Du, D. Yu et al., “Selective growth of Au nanograins on specific positions (tips, edges and facets) of Cu2O octahedrons to form Cu2O-Au hierarchical heterostructures,” Dalton Transactions, vol. 41, pp. 13795–13799, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  18. L. Kong, W. Chen, D. Ma, Y. Yang, S. Liu, and S. Huang, “Size control of Au@Cu2O octahedra for excellent photocatalytic performance,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 719–724, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Maeda and K. Domen, “Photocatalytic water splitting: recent progress and future challenges,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 1, no. 18, pp. 2655–2661, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Yoshida, A. Yamakata, K. Takanabe, J. Kubota, M. Osawa, and K. Domen, “ATR-SEIRAS investigation of the fermi level of Pt cocatalyst on a GaN photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution under irradiation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 131, no. 37, pp. 13218–13219, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Wang, X. Li, H. Li et al., “Semiconductor-noble metal hybrid nanomaterials with controlled structures,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 1, pp. 1587–1590, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  22. B. J. Wood, H. Wise, and R. S. Yolles, “Selectivity and stoichiometry of copper oxide in propylene oxidation,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 355–362, 1969. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. Lu, S. Gao, and J. Wang, “One-pot synthesis of Ag/ZnO self-assembled 3D hollow microspheres with enhanced photocatalytic performance,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 43, pp. 16792–16800, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. Badr and M. A. Mahmoud, “Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange by gold silver nano-core/silica nano-shell,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 413–419, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. A. Mahmoud, W. Qian, and M. A. El-Sayed, “Following charge separation on the nanoscale in Cu2O-Au nanoframe hollow nanoparticles,” Nano Letters, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 3285–3289, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. Ren, Y.-P. Zeng, and D. Jiang, “Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activities of Ag-deposited porous TiO2 sheets,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 645–649, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus