Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 497384 | 6 pages |

Ammonia Gas Detection by Tannic Acid Functionalized and Reduced Graphene Oxide at Room Temperature

Academic Editor: Zhenhui Kang
Received29 Dec 2013
Accepted14 Feb 2014
Published19 Mar 2014


Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) based chemiresistor gas sensor has received much attention in gas sensing for high sensitivity, room temperature operation, and reversible. Here, for the first time, we present a promising chemiresistor for ammonia gas detection based on tannic acid (TA) functionalized and reduced graphene oxide (). Green reductant of TA plays a major role in both reducing process and enhancing the gas sensing properties of . Our results show only selective to ammonia with excellent respond, recovery, respond time, and recovery times. electrical resistance decreases upon exposure to NH3 where we postulated that it is due to n-doping by TA and charge transfer between and NH3 through hydrogen bonding. Furthermore, hinders the needs for stimulus for both recovery and respond. The combination of greener sensing material and simplicity in overall sensor design provides a new sight for green reductant approach of rGO based chemiresistor gas sensor.

1. Introduction

There has been a growing interest in detection of ammonia gas to serve the purpose of detection and monitoring for the field of environmental, automotive, chemical industry, and medical diagnostic [1]. Ammonia gas detection also contributes to explosive detection as ammonium nitrate based explosive releases a trace of ammonia gas when gradually decomposes [2]. On top of that, leakage detection and environment pollution monitoring are the primary concerns as the toxic and corrosive behaviours of ammonia possess severe threat to human skin, eyes, and respiratory tract. The conventional solid state sensor and conducting polymer sensor are suffering from low detection under room temperature. Besides, solid state sensor has the drawbacks of selectivity and complex fabrication process while conducting polymer sensor is often irreversible [37]. The emerging of carbon nanocomposites based chemiresistor especially reduced graphene oxide (rGO) has demonstrated high potential in gas sensing due to high sensitivity, room temperature operation, low power consumption, miniaturization potential, and reversibility, in which posing a trend of surpassing the conventional solid state and conducting polymer sensor. However, rGO chemiresistor is suffering from drawback of poor selectivity where functionalization and use of arrays are often the solution to improve selectivity [8, 9]. Generally, environmental harmful reductant such as hydrazine or sodium borohydride are usually employed in synthesize of rGO. Thus, there is a demand in finding environment benign approach such as green, electrochemical, and solvothermal reductants [1014].

Tannic acid (TA) is a water soluble phenolic hydroxyl-rich compound and is widely present in woods such as oak, walnut, and mahogany [15, 16]. TA has demonstrated itself as an effective green reducing and stabilizing agent on synthesis of graphene, noble metal nanoparticles, and noble metal nanoparticles/graphene nanocomposites [1720]. Recently, Zhang et al. have reported TA functionalized rGO with silver nanoparticles decorated for H2O2 and glucose sensing application [19]. However, TA functionalized rGO solely as gas sensor is rarely reported, in particular on ammonia gas detection. In this paper, for the first time, we demonstrate a simple yet green chemiresistor sensor for ammonia gas detection which comprises just overlapping comb electrode with drop-casted . We employed the green reductant of TA to serve as both reducing and functionalizing agent for , where TA plays a major role in reduction process and enhancing the gas sensing properties. Experimental findings indicate that has fulfilled all the aspects to be considered as an excellent sensor for ammonia gas detection. In addition, has the advantages of room temperature operation, has wide range detection, and hinders the need of stimulus such as current, purging of gas, and UV illumination for recovery/response.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Preparation of rGOTA  functionalized

Reduction of GO by TA was referring to a method reported by Lei et al. in 2011 with modification where reduction time was elongated to 24 hours and pH was adjusted to 9, with the aim to promote the degree of reduction and absorption of TA on rGO [21]. Graphene oxide (XF002) was obtained from XF Nano Inc., China. Tannic acid was obtained from Tianli Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd, China, without further purification. GO was dissolved in DI water and subjected to sonication. TA was dissolved in 90 mL of DI water and temperature was raised to 80°C. Sodium hydroxide was added to adjust the pH to 9. GO was then dropwise added into TA solution. The reaction mixture was kept continuous stirring and maintained at 80°C for 24 hours. The resultant suspension showed a black solution which indicated the reduction of GO to rGO. The resultant suspension was collected and washed three times. The sample was recorded as . was drop casted onto an array of electrode (overlapping comb electrode) and dried in oven.

2.2. Material Characterization and Gas Testing

All the UV-vis absorption spectra were conducted on a Hitachi U-3010 spectrophotometer. Raman spectra were conducted by Horiba Jobin Yvon HR 800 with 514 nm excitation. Raman spectra were fitted by Voigt function using peak fitting function of Origin 9.0.

Keithley Multimeter 2000 was used as electrical resistance measurement. Ammonia gas sensing experiments were carried out in a simple homemade testing chamber as shown in Figure 1 with a net volume of 5655 cm3. The ammonia aqueous was injected into chamber with a distance of 10 cm from sensor. Various concentrations of ammonia aqueous and organic solutions were introduced to the chamber manually via injection at the humidity of 26% and temperature of 25°C. The door of chamber was opened to introduce fresh air for recovery process.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of rGOTA  functionalized

From Raman spectra (Figure 2), peak is found blue shifted from 1602 nm (GO) to 1598 nm () upon reduction. The blue shifting of peak indicated the recovery of hexagonal network upon reduction. The / ratio which was often used to indicate the degree of disorder or defects in rGO is diminished from 0.81 (GO) to 0.59 () which is suggesting the possible decrement in disorder due to reduction process. GO is reduced by TA via two-step nucleophilic reactions and followed by elimination [21, 22]. From Figure 3, UV-Vis spectra of GO have absorption peaks at 228 nm and around 304 nm (small shoulder peak) due to transition of aromatic C–C and transition of C=O [2]. Upon reduction, the absorption peaks disappeared and new peak is found around 270 nm which again suggested the restoration of electronic conjugation [23, 24]. TA has absorption peaks around 213 and 276 nm which are assigned for aromatic units and C=O groups, respectively. Thus the absorption peak of around 213 nm clearly indicated the sorption of TA [25]. The recovery of hexagonal networks is allowing the TA to adsorb on rGO with aromatic rings binding to the surface carbon rings via interactions [21, 26].

3.2. Gas Sensing Characteristic of rGOTA  functionalized

The exposure of to ammonia gas (NH3) responded by decrement in electrical resistance ratio (Figure 4(a)). and are electrical resistance values with and without ammonia gas, respectively. Electrical resistance respond ratio , which is defined as ratio in percentage: , is inversely proportional to NH3 concentration in linear (Figure 4(c)). A plausible sensing mechanism is established. TA is known to be electron donating molecules. TA molecules sorption via stacking n-doped the rGO, which is intrinsically p-type. The interaction between NH3 with would be expecting the donation of negative charge carrier to from NH3, in which NH3 is acting as donor characteristic [27]. Thus, the charge carrier transfer greatly enhances the negative charge carrier density of , leading to decrement in overall electrical resistance which agreed well with the experimental observation [28, 29].

The exposure of to continuous cycles of NH3 has demonstrated good consistency and reversibility of in NH3 gas detection (Figure 4(b)). As from Figure 4(d), gave negligible electrical resistance ratio reading of conductance increment when exposed to organic vapours such as ethanol ( ) and acetone ( ) in compare to NH3 ( ). It clearly suggests the strong selectivity of towards NH3. The strong selectivity towards NH3 may due to NH3 strong reducing and donor behaviour among the introduced vapours, where we evaluated that NH3 injected a much higher amount of negative charge carrier into compared to other introduced vapours. Therefore greatly enhancing the negative charge carrier density of .

Analysis of curves in Figure 4 revealed that it is an immediate sharp response of decrement in resistance followed by gradual recovery and saturation upon exposure to NH3. The gradual recovery region arises from desorption of the weak molecular adsorption onto low energy binding sites such as sp2 bonded carbon. Whereas saturation region arises from molecular interaction with higher energy binding sites, in particular oxygen functional group that is introduced by TA and residual oxygen functional group from incomplete reduction, which is substantially stronger [4, 30, 31]. The molecular interaction of NH3 with occurred through hydrogen bonding with hydroxyl and epoxide groups (Figure 5). The hydrogen bonding between NH3 and hydroxyl group is either occurred by coordination of the N in NH3 to the H in hydroxyl group (OHN) or coordination of one of the H atoms in NH3 to the O in hydroxyl group (NHO). Whereas hydrogen bonding of NH3 with epoxide group is coordination of one of the H atoms in NH3 to the O of epoxide group (NHO) [32, 33].

Strikingly, saturation region is recoverable quickly without the needs of stimulus in which recovery of molecular interaction is usually slow or unrecoverable [4]. This attributes to the good recovery ratio and fast recovery time (Table 1). is defined as ratio in percentage: . is electrical resistance values after ammonia gas desorption. is defined here as time required reaches 90% of initial resistance amplitude. It is to highlight that recovery ratio and recovery time of do not deteriorate with increases of NH3 concentration even in regime of dense concentration (>3000 ppm).

(ppm) (s) (s)


The sorption of TA provides abundant amount of hydroxyl (–OH) and epoxide (=O) which serve as active site for gas absorption, thus enhancing the respond time and sensitivity [34]. The excellent respond times and recovery times (40 s and 260 s, resp., for 1310–6550 ppm of NH3) are assuring the good detection efficiency. Respond ratio and recovery times are paramount in practical application. In addition, has shown great improvement in dense concentration regime compared to previous studies, in particular on recovery ratio , respond ratio , and recovery times where demonstrated respond time of 40 s, recovery ratio of 93.8%, and recovery time of 260 s [31, 35].

4. Conclusion

In summary, we demonstrated a green yet simple NH3 gas sensor based on . Electrical resistance decreases upon exposure to NH3 where we postulated that it is due to n-doping by TA and charge transfer between and NH3 through hydrogen bonding. Experimental findings revealed that has high potential value to be explored for detection of NH3 based on excellent selectivity, respond times, and recovery times, especially under dense concentration regime (>3000 ppm). The stimulus-free, wide range detection capability and room temperature operation do favour the practical use of in NH3 gas sensing.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 91123018, 61172041, 61172040, 50975226, and 60801022), the National 863 Key Project of Panel Displays (Grant no. 2008AA03A314), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.


  1. B. Timmer, W. Olthuis, and A. Van Den Berg, “Ammonia sensors and their applications—a review,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 666–677, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Pandey, G. K. Goswami, and K. K. Nanda, “Nanocomposite based flexible ultrasensitive resistive gas sensor for chemical reactions studies,” Scientific Reports, vol. 3, p. 2082, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. D. Fowler, M. J. Allen, V. C. Tung, Y. Yang, R. B. Kaner, and B. H. Weiller, “Practical chemical sensors from chemically derived graphene,” ACS Nano, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 301–306, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. T. Robinson, F. K. Perkins, E. S. Snow, Z. Wei, and P. E. Sheehan, “Reduced graphene oxide molecular sensors,” Nano Letters, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 3137–3140, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. G. Lu, L. E. Ocola, and J. Chen, “Gas detection using low-temperature reduced graphene oxide sheets,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 94, no. 8, Article ID 083111, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Basu and P. Bhattacharyya, “Recent developments on graphene and graphene oxide based solid state gas sensors,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 173, pp. 1–21, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  7. X. Liu, S. Cheng, H. Liu, S. Hu, D. Zhang, and H. Ning, “A survey on gas sensing technology,” Sensors, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 9635–9665, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Lipatov, A. Varezhnikov, P. Wilson, V. Sysoev, A. Kolmakov, and A. Sinitskii, “Highly selective gas sensor arrays based on thermally reduced graphene oxide,” Nanoscale, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 5426–5434, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. X. Huang, N. Hu, R. Gao et al., “Reduced graphene oxide-polyaniline hybrid: preparation, characterization and its applications for ammonia gas sensing,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 42, pp. 22488–22495, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. Wang, Z. Shi, and J. Yin, “Facile synthesis of soluble graphene via a green reduction of graphene oxide in tea solution and its biocomposites,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1127–1133, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. I. Paredes, S. Villar-Rodil, M. J. Fernández-Merino, L. Guardia, A. Martínez-Alonso, and J. M. D. Tascón, “Environmentally friendly approaches toward the mass production of processable graphene from graphite oxide,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 298–306, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. J. Fernández-Merino, L. Guardia, J. I. Paredes et al., “Vitamin C is an ideal substitute for hydrazine in the reduction of graphene oxide suspensions,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, no. 14, pp. 6426–6432, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. Zhu, S. Guo, Y. Fang, and S. Dong, “Reducing sugar: new functional molecules for the green synthesis of graphene nanosheets,” ACS Nano, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2429–2437, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Y. Zhou, Q. Bao, L. A. L. Tang, Y. Zhong, and K. P. Loh, “Hydrothermal dehydration for the “green” reduction of exfoliated graphene oxide to graphene and demonstration of tunable optical limiting properties,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 2950–2956, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. I. Mueller-Harvey, “Analysis of hydrolysable tannins,” Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 91, no. 1-2, pp. 3–20, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. E. Hagerman, Hydrolyzable Tannin Structural Chemistry. Tannin Handbook, 2002,
  17. S. K. Sivaraman, I. Elango, S. Kumar, and V. Santhanam, “A green protocol for room temperature synthesis of silver nanoparticles in seconds,” Current Science, vol. 97, no. 7, pp. 1055–1059, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  18. X. Tian, J. Li, and S. Pan, “Facile synthesis of single-crystal silver nanowires through a tannin-reduction process,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1839–1844, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Y. Zhang, S. Liu, L. Wang et al., “One-pot green synthesis of Ag nanoparticles-graphene nanocomposites and their applications in SERS, H2O2, and glucose sensing,” RSC Advances, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 538–545, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Y. Zhang, S. Liu, W. Lu, L. Wang, J. Tian, and X. Sun, “In situ green synthesis of Au nanostructures on graphene oxide and their application for catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol,” Catalysis Science and Technology, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 1142–1144, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Y. Lei, Z. Tang, R. Liao, and B. Guo, “Hydrolysable tannin as environmentally friendly reducer and stabilizer for graphene oxide,” Green Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1655–1658, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. Liao, Z. Tang, Y. Lei, and B. Guo, “Polyphenol-reduced graphene oxide: mechanism and derivatization,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 115, no. 42, pp. 20740–20746, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. D. Li, M. B. Müller, S. Gilje, R. B. Kaner, and G. G. Wallace, “Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 101–105, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Zainy, S. Vijay Kumar, H. N. Lim, C. H. Chia, and I. Harrison, “Simple and scalable preparation of reduced graphene oxide-silver nanocomposites via rapid thermal treatment,” Materials Letters, vol. 89, pp. 180–183, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. G. Albu, M. V. Ghica, M. Giurginca, V. Trandafir, L. Popa, and C. Cotrut, “Spectral characteristics and antioxidant properties of tannic acid immobilized on collagen drug-delivery systems,” Revista de Chimie, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 666–672, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  26. D. Lin and B. Xing, “Tannic acid adsorption and its role for stabilizing carbon nanotube suspensions,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 42, no. 16, pp. 5917–5923, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. H. Chang, J. D. Lee, S. M. Lee, and Y. H. Lee, “Adsorption of NH3 and NO2 molecules on carbon nanotubes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, no. 23, pp. 3863–3865, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. B. Kumar, K. Min, M. Bashirzadeh et al., “The role of external defects in chemical sensing of graphene field-effect transistors,” Nano Letters, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 962–1968, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. G. Lu, L. E. Ocola, and J. Chen, “Gas detection using low-temperature reduced graphene oxide sheets,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 94, no. 8, Article ID 083111, 3 pages, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y. Hajati, T. Blom, S. H. Jafri et al., “Improved gas sensing activity in structurally defected bilayer graphene,” Nanotechnology, vol. 23, no. 50, Article ID 505501, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Cui, S. Mao, Z. Wen, J. Chang, Y. Zhang, and J. Chen, “Controllable synthesis of silver nanoparticle-decorated reduced graphene oxide hybrids for ammonia detection,” Analyst, vol. 138, no. 10, pp. 2877–2882, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. E. C. Mattson, K. Pande, M. Unger et al., “Exploring adsorption and reactivity of NH3 on reduced graphene oxide,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 117, no. 20, pp. 10698–10707, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  33. J. A. Robinson, E. S. Snow, Ş. C. Bǎdescu, T. L. Reinecke, and F. K. Perkins, “Role of defects in single-walled carbon nanotube chemical sensors,” Nano Letters, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 1747–1751, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. K. Kim, H. Kang, C. Y. Lee, and W. S. Yun, “Enhanced response to molecular adsorption of structurally defective graphene,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, vol. 31, no. 3, Article ID 030602, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. R. Ghosh, A. Midya, S. Santra, S. K. Ray, and P. K. Guha, “Chemically reduced graphene oxide for ammonia detection at room temperature,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 5, no. 15, pp. 7599–7603, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Sweejiang Yoo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

1809 Views | 1263 Downloads | 37 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.