|
Removal techniques | Advantage(s) | Disadvantage(s) |
|
Electrochemical oxidation | Does not require auxiliary chemicals, high pressures, or high temperatures. | Low selectivity and low reaction rates. |
|
Biological process | Ecologically favorable process. | High capital and operational cost. Handling and disposing the secondary sludge pose problems. |
|
Adsorption | Cost-effective method. Easy availability and operation. Most profitable process and more efficient than the conventional methods (i.e., precipitation, solvent extraction, membrane filtration, etc.). | Merely removes the pollutants from one phase (aqueous) to another (solid matrix). Expensive process for regeneration especially if the pollutants are strongly bound to the adsorbents. |
|
Advanced oxidation processes (AOP) | | |
(i) Ozonation | Powerful oxidation technique oxidizes a large number of organic and inorganic materials. | More complex technology and requires high capital/operational cost. High electric consumption. |
(ii) UV | An effective method that typically does not leave any byproducts which are harmful to the environment. | Less effective if the wastewater has high amounts of particulates which can absorb UV light. |
(iii) UV/H2O2 | An effective technique in the oxidation and mineralization of most organic pollutants. Ease of formation of ∙OH radicals. | Less effective, when the wastewater has high absorbance. High operational cost. |
(iv) O3/UV/H2O2 | Most effective process due to the fast generation of ∙OH radicals. Can treat a wide variety of contaminants. | Needs to compete with high turbidity, solid particles, and heavy metal ions in the aqueous stream. High operational cost. |
(v) Fenton reaction | Simple process. Easy availability of chemicals. | Production of sludge iron waste and handling the waste pose logistical problems. |
(vi) Photo-Fenton reaction | Reduction of sludge iron waste compared to original Fenton reaction. Effective and fast degradation. | Needs a controlled pH medium for better performance. |
(vii) Heterogeneous photocatalysis | Long-term stability at high temperature. Resistance to attrition. Low-cost and environmentally benign treatment technology. | Could form byproducts that can be harmful to the environment. Requires efficient catalysts that can absorb in the visible region. |
|