Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Nanomaterials for Energy-Efficient Applications

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 694073 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/694073

Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube-TiO2 Nanocomposite for Visible-Light-Induced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution

Academic Editor: Xiaohu Huang
Received15 May 2014
Revised05 Jul 2014
Accepted17 Jul 2014
Published10 Aug 2014

Abstract

Multiwalled carbon nanotube- (MWCNT-) TiO2 nanocomposite was synthesized via hydrothermal process and characterized by X-ray diffraction, UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, field emission scanning electron microscope, thermogravimetry analysis, and N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms. Appropriate pretreatment on MWCNTs could generate oxygen-containing groups, which is beneficial for forming intimate contact between MWCNTs and TiO2 and leads to a higher thermal stability of MWCNT-TiO2 nanocomposite. Modification with MWCNTs can extend the visible-light absorption of TiO2. 5 wt% MWCNT-TiO2 derived from hydrothermal treatment at 140°C exhibiting the highest hydrogen generation rate of 15.1 μmolh−1 under visible-light irradiation and a wide photoresponse range from 350 to 475 nm with moderate quantum efficiency (4.4% at 420 nm and 3.7% at 475 nm). The above experimental results indicate that the MWCNT-TiO2 nanocomposite is a promising photocatalyst with good stability and visible-light-induced photoactivity.

1. Introduction

Hydrogen resource obtained directly from water splitting using photocatalyst and solar light is under scrutiny as a clean energy resource; however it has been facing technical challenge to find a stable and efficient photocatalyst that can maximally utilize solar light [1]. In addition to oxide semiconductors, a great variety of novel photoactive semiconductors have been developed in the last few years. Among these, mixed oxides of transition metal like Nb, V, or Ta or with main group elements such as Ga, In, Sb, or Bi have been extensively investigated as attractive candidates for visible-light-induced photocatalysis [2]. Also, sulfides and nitrides of different metals have been frequently selected to obtain materials with visible-light-driven photoactivity [3]. Titania (TiO2) is a widely used photocatalyst due to its high chemical stability, low cost, and nontoxic nature [4], but it can only absorb UV light with low quantum efficiency due to its wide bandgap (ca. 3.2 eV), which limits its application in visible-light-driven photocatalysis. The above problems have been partly resolved by many methods, such as surface modification via organic materials [5], semiconductor coupling [6], bandgap modification by nonmetals [7, 8], and plasmonic metal (Ag and Au) doping [914], creating oxygen vacancies and disorder or dye sensitization [1517].

Due to the special structures and extraordinary mechanical and unique electronic properties, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have the potential to extend the photoresponse range of TiO2 to visible-light region by modification of bandgap and/or sensitization and increase the photoactivity of TiO2 by contribution to high surface area and inhibition of electron-hole recombination [18]. Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) have shown a synergy effect on enhancing photoactivity for H2 evolution over a mixture of SWCNTs and TiO2 [19]. Ou et al. [20] have also demonstrated that multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) could enhance the visible-light-driven photoactivity of TiO2 by acting as a photosensitizer in the MWCNT-TiO2 : Ni composite. MWCNT-TiO2 nanocomposite with visible-light-driven photoactivity was successfully synthesized via direct growth of TiO2 nanoparticles on the surface of the functionalized MWCNTs by the hydrothermal treatment in our group [21]. However, the effects of MWCNT pretreatment, MWCNT content, and synthetic conditions of MWCNT-TiO2 nanocomposite on its photocatalytic hydrogen evolution efficiency and quantum efficiency under monochromatic light irradiation are still beyond our knowledge.

Herein, MWCNT-TiO2 nanocomposite was synthesized, characterized, and employed for photocatalytic H2 production from triethanolamine (TEOA) solution. The effects of pretreatment methods, content of MWCNTs, and hydrothermal temperature on the photocatalytic H2 evolution efficiency over the Pt-loaded photocatalysts were studied. Moreover, the apparent quantum efficiency (AQE) of 5 wt% MWCNT-TiO2 upon incident monochromatic light is also investigated.

2. Experiment

2.1. Pretreatment Methods for MWCNTs

MWCNTs (diameter < 8 nm; length 10–30 μm; purity > 95 wt%) were purchased from Chengdu Organic Chemicals (Chinese Academy Science, China), and were functionalized by different methods: the as-received MWCNTs were chemically oxidized in a mixture of sulfuric acid and nitric acid (3/1, v/v) while being ultrasonicated for 2 h (Method A [22]); the as-received MWCNTs were treated in boiled nitrate solution (20 wt%) for 1 h for surface functionalization (Method B [21]); the as-received MWCNTs were dispersed in 5.0 M HNO3 solution and refluxed for 48 h at 140°C (Method C). These functionalized MWCNTs were washed with water to neutral, dried under vacuum, and denoted as MWCNT (A), MWCNT (B), and MWCNT (C), respectively.

2.2. Preparation and Characterization of MWCNT-TiO2 Nanocomposites

All other chemical reagents used in the study were of analytical grade and used without further purification, unless stated otherwise. The preparation procedure for MWCNT-TiO2 nanocomposites is demonstrated in Figure 1. In a typical experiment, pretreated MWCNTs were ultrasonically dispersed in deionized water, and then titanium sulfate (Ti(SO4)2) was added into the dispersion under stirring. The obtained mixture was added into cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) solution under the molar ratio of Ti(SO4)2 : CTAB : H2O is 1 : 0.12 : 100. After stirring, the resulting mixture (pH 0.2) was aged at room temperature for 12 h and then transferred into an autoclave for 72 h hydrothermal treatment at 100°C. The resulting materials were collected using the centrifugation technique and mixed with a water and ethanol (molar ratio 1 : 1) solution of sodium chloride under stirring at 40°C for 5 h. Resultant sample was washed with water and ethanol, dried at 80°C overnight, and calcined at 400°C for 5 h.

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained on a XRD-6000 diffractometer using Cu Kα as radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm). Scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation was conducted on a JEOL-6700F electron microscope. Diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) were recorded on a Cary 5000 UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere (Varian, USA). Thermogravimetry (TG) curves were recorded on a STA 449C thermal analyzer (Netzsch, Germany). The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface areas were analyzed by nitrogen adsorption-desorption measurement using a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 apparatus after the samples were degassed at 180°C.

2.3. Photocatalytic Activity Measurement

The obtained MWCNT-TiO2 nanocomposite was loaded with Pt and tested for its photocatalytic activity through a photocatalytic hydrogen evolution system as described in our previous publication [21, 23]. A 300 W Xe-lamp (PLS-SXE300C, Beijing Trusttech Co., Ltd., China) was applied as the light source, which was collimated and focalized into 5 cm2 parallel faculae. A cut-off filter (Kenko, L-42; λ > 420 nm) was employed to obtain the visible-light irradiation (λ > 420 nm). The reaction was performed in a water suspension which contains 85 mL water, 15 mL triethanolamine (TEOA), and 40 mg photocatalyst. The suspension was irradiated from top of the system after thoroughly removing air. H2 production rate was analyzed with a gas chromatograph (GC, SP-6800A, TCD detector, 5 Å molecular sieve columns, and Ar carrier).

The apparent quantum efficiency (AQE) was measured under the same photocatalytic reaction condition except for the incident monochromatic light wavelength. The hydrogen yields of 1 h photocatalytic reaction under visible-light with different wavelengths of 350, 365, 380, 420, 435, 450, 475, 500, 520, and 550 nm were measured. Each run was carried out three times and the average value was taken (the relative errors are under 10%). The band-pass and cut-off filters and a calibrated Si photodiode (SRC-1000-TC-QZ-N, Oriel, USA) were used in measurement. Apparent quantum efficiencies at different wavelengths were calculated by the following equation:

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of MWCNT, TiO2, and various MWCNT-TiO2 nanocomposites. As can be seen from Figure 2(a), the main diffraction peaks of various products can be ascribed to anatase TiO2, whereas a decrease in the crystallinity of anatase can be found after the introduction of MWCNTs, indicating the decrease in the grain size of TiO2. The characteristic peaks for CNTs at 2θ = 26.0° and 43.4° were not observed for 1.25–10 wt% MWCNT-TiO2, which is different from the previous observation [24]. This phenomenon could be attributed to the good dispersion of MWCNTs in the nanocomposite after surface functionalization in nitrate solution [21]. Average crystal sizes calculated using Scherrer equation [25] from the broadening of the (101) peaks of the anatase are 18.1, 12.8, 12.1, 12.9, 12.6, and 11.8 nm for TiO2 and 1.25~20 wt% MWCNT-TiO2, respectively (see Table 1). The small grain of TiO2 nanoparticles in MWCNT-TiO2 may be attributed to restricted direct contact of grains due to the presence of MWCNTs.


Sample Crystal sizea (nm) (wt%) (m2/g)Mean pore sizec (nm)Total volumed (cm3/g)

1.25 wt% MWNT-TiO212.81.5110.810.90.35
2.5 wt% MWNT-TiO212.13.297.512.40.36
5 wt% MWNT-TiO212.95.779.812.10.28
10 wt% MWNT-TiO212.69.9110.111.80.37
20 wt% MWNT-TiO211.818.5166.79.10.42
MWNT392.57.60.74

aCalculated by the Scherrer equation.
bCarbon content determined by TGA-DSC analyses.
cAverage pore diameter calculated from BJH desorption average pore width (4 V/A).
dSingle point total pore volume at the relative pressure of ca. 0.995.

As can be observed from Figure 2(b), even for MWCNT-TiO2 calcined at 800°C for 5 h, the XRD pattern shows that all of the crystal phases are still anatase; no peak of rutile appears. Average crystal sizes calculated from the broadening of the (101) peaks of the anatase are 11.6, 12.9, 13.6, 17.8, and 32.9 nm for the 5 wt% MWCNT-TiO2 as-synthesized and calcined at 400, 500, 600, and 800°C, respectively. These results suggest that MWCNTs in the nanocomposite probably inhibit the phase transformation of TiO2 from amorphous phase to anatase phase and lead to a higher thermal stability.

To estimate the real content of MWCNTs in composites, 1.25–10 wt% MWCNT-TiO2 were analyzed by TGA technique. The results shown in Table 1 suggest that the MWCNT/TiO2 ratios estimated before the synthesis of the MWCNT-TiO2 were consistent with the results obtained from TGA analysis. Therefore, negligible losses of MWCNTs occurred during the nanocomposite preparation procedure, which is in accordance with the results of Raman analysis on 5 wt% MWCNT-TiO2 [21]. The BET specific surface areas and pore volumes of the samples are summarized in Table 1. Compared with mesoporous TiO2 nanoparticles prepared via hydrothermal processes [26], there is a rapid decrease in both BET surface area (from 318 to 111 m2/g) and total volume (from 0.61 to 0.35 cm3/g) of TiO2 nanoparticles after modification with 1.25 wt% MWCNT, which could be due to the close-packed structure between TiO2 nanoparticles and MWCNTs. With increasing MWCNT content, the BET surface area of MWCNT-TiO2 decreased firstly and then increased, which can be attributed to the destruction of close-packing due to the self-agglomeration of MWCNTs or TiO2 nanoparticles at high content.

The UV-vis spectra of MWCNT-TiO2 display a similar absorption edge to TiO2 (Figure 3), but an apparent enhancement of absorption throughout the visible-light region can be observed even for the nanocomposite containing 1.25 wt% MWCNTs. A correlation between the MWCNTs amount and absorption changes in the UV-vis spectra obviously features the enhancement of visible-light absorption upon increasing the MWCNT content; that is, the adsorption intensity of the present MWCNT-TiO2 continuously increased with enhancing MWCNT content owing to its good dispersion.

Control experiments showed no appreciable H2 evolution in the absence of either photocatalyst or irradiation under visible-light or full spectra irradiation. H2 generation rates over 5 wt% MWCNT + TiO2 (a simple mixture of MWCNTs and TiO2 nanoparticles), 5 wt% MWCNT-TiO2, TiO2, and MWCNTs under the visible-light and full spectra irradiation are shown in Figure 4. The pristine TiO2 and MWCNTs as well as the MWCNT + TiO2 demonstrate no appreciable H2 evolution under the visible-light irradiation, whereas MWCNT-TiO2 (A, B, and C) exhibits various H2 generation rates, suggesting the importance of chemical linking between MWCNTs and TiO2 for their visible-light-driven photoactivity [27]. The pretreatment of MWCNTs has a strong effect on the photocatalytic H2 evolution efficiency over MWCNT-TiO2. MWCNT-TiO2 (B) demonstrates the highest H2 evolution rate under both visible-light and full spectra irradiation.

Different oxidizing reagents possess different degrees of oxidation power, which would purify and decorate MWCNTs with oxygen-containing groups or even destroy their nanotube structure [28]. It is reported that MWCNT bundles appear exfoliated and curled after treatment with strong oxidative environment such as refluxing in nitric acid or stirring in piranha (mixture of sulphuric acid 96 wt% and hydrogen peroxide 30 wt% in ratio 70 : 30) [29]. Comparing the method of refluxing in nitric acid with that of sonicating in a mixture of sulfuric acid and nitric acid, the method of refluxing in nitrate solution provides a moderate oxidation that would generate oxygen-containing groups but would not destroy the MWCNTs structure. Therefore, MWCNT-TiO2 (B) exhibited the highest photoactivity.

As demonstrated in Figure 5, MWCNT-TiO2 exhibits no photocatalytic activity until the MWCNT content enhanced to 3.5 wt% under visible-light irradiation. After that, its photocatalytic H2 evolution efficiency increases firstly and then decreases slightly with further enhancement of the MWCNT content. The maximum efficiency is achieved at 5 wt% MWCNT-TiO2 under visible-light irradiation.

It is believed that TiO2 nanoparticles could directly grow on the surface of the functionalized MWCNTs through the hydrothermal treatment [21]. As shown in Figure 6, no MWCNTs were found in the SEM micrograph of 2.5 wt% MWCNT-TiO2, which can be attributed to the fact that MWCNTs are embedded inside the nanocomposite by TiO2 nanoparticles, resulting from the direct growth of TiO2 on the surface of MWCNTs. For 5 wt% MWCNT-TiO2, MWCNTs can be observed on the surface of nanocomposite owing to the increase of MWCNT content. These observations can fairly explain the effect of MWCNT content on the visible-light-induced photoactivity. For the MWCNT-TiO2 with MWCNT content less than 3.5 wt%, MWCNTs embedded inside the nanocomposite cannot be irradiated and excited by visible-light, and thus no visible-light-induced photoactivity was observed [30]. As the visible-light absorbent and sensitizer, higher MWCNT content means more efficient visible-light absorption, and more photogenerated electrons can be transferred to TiO2; TiO2 also plays an important role in the separation of photogenerated carriers: the electrons can be transferred from TiO2 to the loaded Pt. It is reported [31] that the electrical conductivity in the interfacial contact between graphene and photocatalyst components is vital to the overall photocatalytic H2 production. In addition, unintentional doping of TiO2 may happen under annealing at 400°C [32, 33], which can increase the visible-light absorbance of TiO2 and MWCNT-TiO2. Therefore, there exists an optimal ratio of MWCNT to TiO2 for achieving excellent electrical conductivity in the nanocomposites and significant photoactivity for H2 evolution [30].

Under full spectra irradiation, MWCNT-TiO2 with small MWCNT contents (1.25 wt% and 2.5 wt%) exhibits lower photoactivity than the pure titania, whereas 5 wt% and 3.5 wt% MWCNT-TiO2 demonstrate the better and the best photoactivity, respectively. Carbon materials such as graphene, C60, and CNT can act as electron traps due to their high electron affinities [31, 34, 35], which would be functionalized as charge separators and enhance the photoactivity [30, 36]. However, as discussed above, for the MWCNT-TiO2 with MWCNT content less than 3.5 wt%, MWCNTs embedded inside the nanocomposite could act as recombination center of electron and holes, resulting in a reduced photoactivity under full spectra irradiation.

It is well understood that the hydrothermal temperature plays an important role in the morphology, crystallinity, and particle size of TiO2 [37], which are related to the photoactivity. The effect of hydrothermal temperature on the H2 generation rate was evaluated under visible-light irradiation. As demonstrated in Figure 7, the H2 generation rate over 5 wt% MWCNT-TiO2 increases with the enhanced hydrothermal temperature before 140°C and decreases afterwards under both visible-light and full spectra irradiation. The highest H2 generation rate of 15.1 μmol·h−1 under visible-light irradiation was obtained with 140°C hydrothermal treatment, whereas that of 323.7 μmol·h−1 under full spectra irradiation was obtained with 100°C hydrothermal treatment.

The above experimental results could be rationalized by the following discussions. As can be seen from Figure 8, the XRD patterns of 5 wt% MWCNT-TiO2 derived from different hydrothermal temperatures confirm the fact that the crystallinity of MWCNT-TiO2 increases with enhancing hydrothermal temperature. It can be calculated using Scherrer equation [25] that average crystal sizes of the anatase are 8.3, 12.9, 15.7, and 26.7 nm for the 5 wt% MWCNT-TiO2 with hydrothermal temperature of 80, 100, 140, and 180°C, respectively [38]. Under visible-light irradiation, MWCNTs, as a photosensitizer, can absorb visible-light and the photogenerated electrons (e) can be excited from the VB to CB of the MWCNT [39]. TiO2, as the “bridge” between MWCNTs and loaded Pt, would transfer the photogenerated electrons from MWCNT to Pt nanoparticles to generate H2 from water reduction [40]. As the electron acceptor and transfer station, TiO2 with high crystallinity and tight combination with MWCNTs could benefit the electron injections and suppress the electron-hole recombination. On the other hand, high crystallinity of TiO2 would inevitably lead to large crystal size and particle size, which would lead to a high electron-hole recombination rate owing to the long distance for electron transfer. As a result, 5 wt% MWCNT-TiO2 derived from hydrothermal treatment at 140°C has the highest photoactivity under visible-light irradiation.

Under full spectra irradiation, photocatalytic H2 generation over TiO2 irradiated by UV light would make the best part comparing to that over MWCNT-TiO2 irradiated by visible-light. 5 wt% MWCNT-TiO2 derived from hydrothermal treatment at 100°C possesses moderate crystal size of anatase, resulting in the highest photoactivity due to the large surface area of MWCNT-TiO2 and low electron-hole recombination rate.

The photocatalytic activities for H2 production over 5 wt% MWCNT-TiO2 upon incident light with different wavelength were investigated. MWCNT-TiO2 shows a relatively wide photoresponse under monochromatic light of wavelength ranging from 350 to 475 nm (Figure 9), which is consistent with the experimental results obtained with visible-light irradiation (see Figure 4). The apparent quantum efficiency (AQE) of MWCNT-TiO2 as a function of the wavelength of the incident light was calculated according to the data in Figure 9. MWCNT-TiO2 demonstrates high quantum efficiency upon irradiation with wavelengths of 420 and 475 nm (4.4% and 3.7%, resp.). With respect to the wide adsorption band in the entire visible-light region (Figure 3), a panchromatic photocatalytic activity could be expected for 5 wt% MWCNT-TiO2. However, no appreciable H2 evolution is showed upon irradiation with wavelength longer than 500 nm. As demonstrated in our earlier study, not all MWCNTs in the nanocomposite are bound with TiO2 nanoparticles, owing to the limited hydroxyl and carboxyl groups generated on the MWCNTs after the functionalization [21]. Therefore, the absorption band between 400 and 800 nm of MWCNT-TiO2 nanocomposite probably is a combination of the absorption spectrum of both MWCNT-TiO2 and uncoupled MWCNT, which would absorb light with wavelength longer than 500 nm but cannot be excited to generate electron-hole pairs. On the other hand, the energy of the incident light at longer wavelength dramatically decreased, which would inevitably depress the photoactivity over MWCNT-TiO2. Furthermore, the photoactivity of TiO2 under UV light irradiation is enhanced after coupling with MWCNT. The quantum efficiencies for H2 production over P25 TiO2, mesoporous TiO2, and MWCNT-TiO2 at 350 nm were measured to be 1.9, 2.5, and 3.8%, respectively. These phenomena were consistent with the previous discussion that MWCNTs could increase the carrier separation efficiency during photocatalytic process under full spectra irradiation.

4. Conclusions

A series of MWCNT-TiO2 nanocomposites with different types of functionalized MWCNTs were synthesized through hydrothermal process and characterized by XRD, DRS, SEM, TGA, and BET techniques. The effects of pretreatment methods on MWCNT, MWCNT content, and hydrothermal temperature on the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution efficiency over MWCNT-TiO2 nanocomposite were investigated. MWCNTs have a good dispersion in the nanocomposite, which inhibit grain growth of TiO2 and improve its thermal stability. Appropriate pretreatment on MWCNTs could generate oxygen-containing groups, which would become the anchoring sites with TiO2 nanoparticles in the nanocomposite. However, chemical pretreatment with strong oxidative agents would destroy the intrinsic structure of MWCNTs, which is not beneficial for a high photocatalytic activity. The best photocatalytic activity was observed for the MWCNT-TiO2 nanocomposite with a 5% weight ratio under visible-light irradiation. The photocatalytic activity of MWCNT-TiO2 is related to the crystallinity of TiO2, link type between MWCNT and TiO2, and MWCNT content. A wide range of photoresponse from 350 to 475 nm is observed with high quantum efficiency. Upon irradiation with wavelengths of 420 and 475 nm, the quantum efficiency is 4.4% and 3.7%, respectively. The above experimental results indicate that the present MWCNT-TiO2 nanocomposite is a promising photocatalyst with good thermal stability, chemical stability under UV light irradiation, and visible-light-induced photoactivity.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The research was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (20973128, 21271146, and 21307035), Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2011CDB139), and Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of China (2013PY112).

References

  1. A. Kudo, “Development of photocatalyst materials for water splitting,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 197–202, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. X. B. Chen, S. H. Shen, L. J. Guo, and S. S. Mao, “Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 110, no. 11, pp. 6503–6570, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. Kitano and M. Hara, “Heterogeneous photocatalytic cleavage of water,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 627–641, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. X. Liu, Z. Q. Liu, J. Zheng et al., “Characteristics of N-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays by N2-plasma for visible light-driven photocatalysis,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 509, no. 41, pp. 9970–9976, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. Jiang, Y. Xu, B. Hou, D. Wu, and Y. Sun, “Synthesis of visible light-activated TiO2 photocatalyst via surface organic modification,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 180, no. 5, pp. 1787–1791, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. Park, Y. K. Kirn, and W. Choi, “Reversing CdS preparation order and its effects on photocatalytic hydrogen production of CdS/Pt-TiO2 hybrids under visible light,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 115, pp. 6141–6148, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. In, A. Orlov, R. Berg et al., “Effective visible light-activated B-doped and B,N-codoped TiO2 photocatalysts,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 129, no. 45, pp. 13790–13791, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Bingham and W. A. Daoud, “Recent advances in making nano-sized TiO2 visible-light active through rare-earth metal doping,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 2041–2050, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. H. Gao, C. Liu, H. E. Jeong, and P. Yang, “Plasmon-enhanced photocatalytic activity of iron oxide on gold nanopillars,” ACS Nano, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 234–240, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Z. Liu, W. Hou, P. Pavaskar, M. Aykol, and S. B. Cronin, “Plasmon resonant enhancement of photocatalytic water splitting under visible illumination,” Nano Letters, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1111–1116, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Z. Zhan, J. An, H. Zhang, R. V. Hansen, and L. Zheng, “Three-dimensional plasmonic photoanodes based on Au-embedded TiO2 structures for enhanced visible-light water splitting,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1139–1144, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Primo, A. Corma, and H. Garcia, “Titania supported gold nanoparticles as photocatalyst,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 13, pp. 886–910, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. K. Awazu, M. Fujimaki, C. Rockstuhl et al., “A plasmonic photocatalyst consisting of silver nanoparticles embedded in titanium dioxide,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 1676–1680, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. B. Ingram and S. Linic, “Water splitting on composite plasmonic-metal/semiconductor photoelectrodes: evidence for selective plasmon-induced formation of charge carriers near the semiconductor surface,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 14, pp. 5202–5205, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. Ihara, M. Miyoshi, Y. Iriyama, O. Matsumoto, and S. Sugihara, “Visible-light-active titanium oxide photocatalyst realized by an oxygen-deficient structure and by nitrogen doping,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 403–409, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. X. B. Chen, L. Liu, P. Y. Yu, and S. S. Mao, “Increasing solar absorption for photocatalysis with black hydrogenated titanium dioxide nanocrystals,” Science, vol. 331, no. 6018, pp. 746–750, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. Y. Chang, W. J. Tzeng, C. H. Lin, and S. Y. Cheng, “Ionic compounds lamination reaction and characteristics of photosensitive copper indium sulfide on titania nanotube arrays,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 509, no. 35, pp. 8700–8706, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. R. Leary and A. Westwood, “Carbonaceous nanomaterials for the enhancement of TiO2 photocatalysis,” Carbon, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 741–772, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. B. Ahmmad, Y. Kusumoto, S. Somekawa, and M. Ikeda, “Carbon nanotubes synergistically enhance photocatalytic activity of TiO2,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1410–1413, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Y. Ou, J. D. Lin, S. M. Fang, and D. W. Liao, “MWNT–TiO2:Ni composite catalyst: a new class of catalyst for photocatalytic H2 evolution from water under visible light illumination,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 429, pp. 199–203, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. Dai, T. Y. Peng, D. N. Ke, and B. Q. Wei, “Photocatalytic hydrogen generation using a nanocomposite of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and TiO2 nanoparticles under visible light irradiation,” Nanotechnology, vol. 20, no. 12, Article ID 125603, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. B. Kim and W. M. Sigmund, “Functionalized multiwall carbon nanotube/gold nanoparticle composites,” Langmuir, vol. 20, no. 19, pp. 8239–8242, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. Zeng, Q. G. Zhang, X. Zhang, and T. Y. Peng, “Graphite oxide-TiO2 nanocomposite and its efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 516, pp. 85–90, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. W. D. Wang, P. Serp, P. Kalck, and J. L. Faria, “Visible light photodegradation of phenol on MWNT-TiO2 composite catalysts prepared by a modified sol-gel method,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 235, no. 1-2, pp. 194–199, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. X. H. Huang, Z. Y. Zhan, X. Wang et al., “Rayleigh-instability-driven simultaneous morphological and compositional transformation from Co nanowires to CoO octahedra,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 97, Article ID 203112, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. T. Peng, D. Zhao, K. Dai, W. Shi, and K. Hirao, “Synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with mesoporous anatase wall and high photocatalytic activity,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 11, pp. 4947–4952, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. G. M. An, W. H. Ma, Z. M. Sun et al., “Preparation of titania/carbon nanotube composites using supercritical ethanol and their photocatalytic activity for phenol degradation under visible light irradiation,” Carbon, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1795–1801, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. W. H. Lee, S. J. Kim, W. J. Lee, J. G. Lee, R. C. Haddon, and P. J. Reucroft, “X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic studies of surface modified single-walled carbon nanotube material,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 181, no. 1-2, pp. 121–127, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. V. Datsyuk, M. Kalyva, K. Papagelis et al., “Chemical oxidation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes,” Carbon, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 833–840, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. G. Yu, T. T. Ma, and S. W. Liu, “Enhanced photocatalytic activity of mesoporous TiO2 aggregates by embedding carbon nanotubes as electron-transfer channel,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 13, pp. 3491–3501, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Q. J. Xiang and J. G. Yu, “Graphene-based photocatalysts for hydrogen generation,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 4, pp. 753–759, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. X. H. Huang, C. B. Tay, Z. Y. Zhan et al., “Universal photoluminescence evolution of solution-grown ZnO nanorods with annealing: important role of hydrogen donor,” CrystEngComm, vol. 13, no. 23, pp. 7032–7036, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. X. H. Huang, Z. Y. Zhan, K. P. Pramoda, C. Zhang, L. X. Zheng, and S. J. Chua, “Correlating the enhancement of UV luminescence from solution-grown ZnO nanorods with hydrogen doping,” CrystEngComm, vol. 14, no. 16, pp. 5163–5165, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. K. Dai, Y. Yao, H. Liu, I. Mohamed, H. Chen, and Q. Y. Huang, “Enhancing the photocatalytic activity of lead molybdate by modifying with fullerene,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 374, pp. 111–117, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  35. C. Liu, H. Chen, K. Dai, A. Xue, and Q. Huang, “Synthesis, characterization, and its photocatalytic activity of double-walled carbon nanotubes-TiO2 hybrid,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1499–1505, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. Dai, X. H. Zhang, K. Fan, T. Y. Peng, and B. Q. Wei, “Hydrothermal synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotube—TiO2 hybrid and its photocatalytic activity,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 270, pp. 238–244, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. D. S. Kim and S. Y. Kwak, “The hydrothermal synthesis of mesoporous TiO2 with high crystallinity, thermal stability, large surface area, and enhanced photocatalytic activity,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 323, pp. 110–118, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. Bangkedphol, H. E. Keenan, C. M. Davidson, A. Sakultantimetha, W. Sirisaksoontorn, and A. Songsasen, “Enhancement of tributyltin degradation under natural light by N-doped TiO2 photocatalyst,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 184, no. 1–3, pp. 533–537, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. O. Akhavan, M. Abdolahad, Y. Abdi, and S. Mohajerzadeh, “Synthesis of titania/carbon nanotube heterojunction arrays for photoinactivation of E. coli in visible light irradiation,” Carbon, vol. 47, no. 14, pp. 3280–3287, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. T. Puangpetch, T. Sreethawong, and S. Chavadej, “Hydrogen production over metal-loaded mesoporous-assembled SrTiO3 nanocrystal photocatalysts: effects of metal type and loading,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 35, no. 13, pp. 6531–6540, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Ke Dai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1990 Views | 754 Downloads | 15 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.