Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 750813, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/750813
Research Article

Infrared-Mediated Drug Elution Activity of Gold Nanorod-Grafted TiO2 Nanotubes

1Department of Dental Biomaterials and Institute of Biomaterial and Implant, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, 344-2 Shinyong dong, Iksan, Jeonbuk 570-749, Republic of Korea
2Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92093, USA

Received 26 May 2014; Accepted 16 July 2014; Published 24 July 2014

Academic Editor: Young-Bum Park

Copyright © 2014 Kyung-Suk Moon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to prepare gold nanorod- (GNR-) grafted TiO2 nanotubes by thiolactic acid treatment and evaluate remote-controlled drug elution and antibacterial activity by infrared (IR) light irradiation. Tetracycline used as an antibiotic was loaded into GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes by using 2 w/v% polylactic acid solutions. A near-IR laser (830 nm) was used for remote-controlled IR light irradiation. Results of SEM, TEM, XRD, and EDX revealed that GNR chemically bonded to the whole surface of the TiO2 nanotubes. An antibiotic release test revealed that on-off drug elution was triggered effectively by the photothermal effect of GNR grafted on TiO2 nanotubes. Furthermore, an antibacterial agar zone test indicated that the annihilated zone of Streptococcus mutans in the experimental group with IR light irradiation was significantly larger than that of the corresponding group without IR light irradiation (). Therefore, GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes would be expected to extend the limited usage of TiO2, which show photocatalytic activity only within the ultraviolet (UV) to IR region, thereby allowing the development of novel fusion technologies in the field of implant materials.

1. Introduction

The long-term clinical success of implants is decided by osseointegration at the interface of an implant and bone tissue at the early stage of implantation [1]. Many studies have been conducted on accelerating osseointegration by modifying the surface roughness of implants and coating them with growth factors or hormones, which enhances the initial attachment of bone marrow cells, on the basis of the chemical properties, charge, microstructure, and porosity of the implant surface [14]. However, most recent techniques for enhancing osseointegration are also vulnerable to bacterial infection. Bacteria are as likely to attach to a surface coated by growth factor or proteins, as bone marrow cells are. Once bacteria permeate into the coated surface, it is impossible to eradicate them by using common sterilization techniques.

The resolution of bacterial infection generally requires antibiotic therapy approximately 2 months after implant surgery. There are many ways to deliver antibiotics to a target in a patient’s body, including systemic, intravenous, intramuscular, and topical methods. Systemic delivery is typically associated with some side effects as well as inevitable cytotoxicity. Much research has been undertaken to develop various drug delivery systems to achieve efficacy at a localized target area [5, 6].

Most of the recently developed drug delivery systems have excellent targeting capability and proper drug delivery and afford an immediate reduction of bacterial infection [711]. However, most of these systems do not afford control of the time and period of drug elution. In particular, drug elution is not required immediately after implant surgery, but 2 months after the surgery. Therefore, a new delivery system that affords control of the time of drug elution and accurate dosing of antibiotics to the target area is required.

TiO2 nanotubes have been studied predominantly in the field of photocatalysis [1214], solar cells [15], and biomedical engineering [1618], because of their excellent photocatalytic activity and biocompatibility. In addition, the high surface area and unique shape of TiO2 nanotubes make them a promising option for application in drug delivery systems.

TiO2 photocatalysts have been mostly used for the purification of air and water [19, 20] by UV light irradiation. However, the limited photocatalytic activity of TiO2 within the UV range presents difficulties in biomedical and tissue engineering applications owing to the potential harmful effects of UV light. Our previous study was focused on extension of the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 to the visible light region by doping nitrogen into the TiO2 crystal structure, which would allow remote control of antibiotic elution by visible light irradiation [21]. On the basis of the results of our previous study, we expected IR light to be more effective than visible light, owing to its superior skin penetration.

Gold nanorods (GNR) are known to have much potential for mediating photodynamic and photothermal effects at near IR light [2227]. As such, GNR have found promising application in the field of cancer treatment as a photosensitizer. In other medical applications, IR light has been widely used for the therapy of back pain and chronic nonhealing wounds [28]. IR light can also overcome the limitation of visible light, which cannot penetrate deep into the skin. We anticipate that the photothermal activity of GNR would allow for remote control of on-off drug elution by IR laser irradiation.

In this study, we immobilized GNR at the surface of TiO2 nanotubes via a grafting technique and investigated on-off drug release triggered by near-IR laser irradiation. In addition, antimicrobial activity was monitored to assess the effectiveness of GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes in allowing remotely controlled drug release by IR laser irradiation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fabrication of TiO2 Nanotubes

As reported previously [29], a machined Ti sheet (0.2 mm thick, 99.5%; Hyundai Titanium Co., South Korea) was polished by an electropolishing process and cleaned with ethyl alcohol (99.5%, Dae-Jung Chemical, South Korea) and double-distilled water. TiO2 nanotubes (diameter; 100 nm) were prepared in 0.5 w/v% hydrofluoric acid (48 w/v%, Merck, NJ, USA) in water with acetic acid (98 w/v%, JT Baker, NJ, USA; volumetric ratio = 7 : 1) at 20 V for 1 h. A platinum electrode (99.99%, DSM Co., South Korea) served as the counterpart. The samples were then rinsed with double-distilled water, dried at 60°C, and heat-treated at 400°C for 3 h to crystallize amorphous TiO2 nanotubes into anatase structures.

2.2. Gold Nanorod (GNR) Synthesis

GNR were synthesized by modifying the three-step protocol described previously [30]. First, a solution was prepared to facilitate the seeding of GNR. 5 mL of 0.0005 M HAuCl4 (Sigma, MO, USA) and 60 μL of 0.01 M NaBH4 (Sigma, MO, USA) were mixed vigorously in 5 mL of 0.2 M cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB; Sigma, MO, USA) for 2 min. The mixed seed solution was stored at 25°C and used within 3 h. Secondly, another solution was prepared to grow crystals from the GNR seeds. 200 μL of 0.004 M AgNO3 (Sigma, MO, USA) and 500 μL of 0.01 M HAuCl4 were added to 5 mL of 0.2 M CTAB solution and mixed until the solution turned yellow. Further addition of 70 μL of 0.0788 M L-ascorbic acid (Sigma, MO, USA) discharged the color, leading to a clear solution. 12 μL of the previously prepared seed solution was then added to this solution, and the mixture was shaken gently and stored at 25°C for 4 h.

2.3. GNR Grafting Process

To graft GNR at the surface of TiO2 nanotubes, we modified the protocol reported previously [31, 32]. As shown in Figure 1, TiO2 nanotubes were first treated with various concentrations of aqueous thiolactic acid (0.1, 0.2, and 0.5 M; Sigma, MO, USA) for 30 min and then dried at 60°C for 12 h. The GNR solution prepared above was added to the pretreated TiO2 nanotubes, and the mixture was stored at 25°C for 2 h and then dried at 60°C for 12 h.

750813.fig.001
Figure 1: Schematic diagram of preparing gold nanorod- (GNR-) grafted TiO2 nanotubes by thiolactic acid treatment.
2.4. Surface Characterization

The morphology and optical properties of synthesized GNR were assessed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEM-2010, JEOL, Japan) and UV-Vis spectrophotometry (UVmini-1240, Shimadzu, Japan). Morphologic observation and crystal structure of GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes were determined using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM; S4800, Hitachi/Horiba Co., Japan) and thin film X-ray diffractometer (XRD; X’PERT-MRD, Phillips Co., USA), respectively. The amount of GNR grafted at the surface of TiO2 nanotubes was analyzed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) equipped with FE-SEM.

2.5. Drug Release Test

A solution of 10 g of tetracycline (Sigma, MO, USA) in 50 mL of DMSO was added to a solution of 4 g of polylactic acid (PLA; Sigma, MO, USA) in 50 mL of tetrahydrofuran (THF; Sigma, MO, USA) and the mixture was stirred for 3 h. The resulting solution was loaded into TiO2 nanotubes by a vacuum loading technique [21]. A microplate ELISA reader (Spectra Max 250; Thermo Electron Co., USA) measured the amount of tetracycline released as a function of incubation period. The amount of tetracycline released in response to IR light irradiation was also measured by a microplate ELISA reader. The source of IR light was a near-IR laser (Power: 200 mW and wavelength: 830 nm; RaeHwa LMA, South Korea).

2.6. Antibacterial Agar Diffusion Test

To perform the antibacterial agar diffusion test of GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes, Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25176, ATCC, USA) was incubated in brain-heart infusion broth (BHIB; Difco Co., USA). When the bacterium showed high confluence, 100 μL of the incubating solution was diluted into 1 × 105 CFU/mL and seeded onto agar medium. The combination was stored in an incubator at 37°C for 24 h in order to solidify the agar medium and form the Streptococcus mutans colony. Experimental specimens (1 × 1 cm2) were placed onto Streptococcus mutans incubated solid agar medium, and IR laser irradiation was conducted for 1 min. After IR laser irradiation, the specimen was stored at 37°C for 24 h. The experimental specimens without IR laser treatment were placed directly at 37°C incubator and stored for 24 h. After a second incubation period of 24 hours, the zone diameters of the death of the Streptococcus mutans colony in control and experimental specimens were measured 3 times per specimen in order to minimize the error of measurement.

2.7. Data Analysis

All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation values and analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA (SPSS 12.0; SPSS GmbH, Germany) and post hoc Duncan’s multiple range tests. Significant differences were considered if values were less than 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows the TEM micrograph and UV-Vis spectrum results of GNR synthesized in this study. From the TEM image and the aspect ratio distribution diagram of GNR, relatively uniform-sized GNR (diameter;  nm, aspect ratio; 3.83) were synthesized, and round-shaped gold nanoparticles were not detected. The electron absorption spectrum of synthesized GNR showed two peaks at wavelength of 509 and 830 nm, which was the main phenomenon of photothermal scattering of short and long axis of GNR, respectively. In this study, 830 nm near-IR laser was used to perform on-off drug release and remote-controlled antimicrobial activity tests, thereby maximizing the photothermal effect of the synthesized GNR.

750813.fig.002
Figure 2: (a) TEM micrograph and (b) UV-Vis absorption spectra of GNR prepared in this research. (c) The distribution of GNR aspect ratio obtained from TEM micrographs.

Figure 3 shows FE-SEM and EDX micrographs of GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes treated by different concentrations of thiolactic acid (0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 M). As shown in the FE-SEM images, there was no destruction or blocking of TiO2 nanotubes after thiolactic acid treatment with different concentrations. In addition, small nanomaterials were observed on TiO2 nanotubes, but it is difficult to confirm whether these nanomaterials were GNR or not. From the EDX result, GNR chemically conjugated on TiO2 nanotubes were confirmed by the element analysis of Au.

fig3
Figure 3: ((a), (b), (c)) FE-SEM micrographs of GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes treated by (a) 0.1 M, (b) 0.5 M, and (c) 1.0 M thiolactic acid solution. (d) EDX results of GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes treated by 0.1 M thiolactic acid solution.

Table 1 lists the amounts of main elements detected at the surface of TiO2 nanotubes treated by different concentrations of aqueous thiolactic acid solution. From the results of elementary analysis, the total amount of gold detected by EDX was less than 12 wt%. In addition, 0.1 M thiolactic acid showed the most effective grafting among the three thiolactic acid concentrations. To double-check the optimal concentration of thiolactic acid solution, we tested elementary analysis on the conditions of 0.01 and 0.05 M thiolactic acid solution and confirmed that the gold contents of 0.1 M thiolactic acid treated groups were higher than that of 0.01 and 0.05 M thiolactic acid treated group (data are not shown).

tab1
Table 1: EDX results of GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes treated by various concentrations of aqueous thiolactic acid solution.

Figure 4 displays X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes. As shown, XRD mainly detected anatase TiO2 and Ti crystalline phases from the XRD patterns of TiO2 nanotubes. In addition, the XRD pattern of GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes indicated that two additional peaks corresponding to the (111) and (200) peaks of gold nanorods were detected at 38 and 44.8°, respectively, as reported previously [33]. Therefore, we concluded that the covalent immobilization of GNR had no effect on the crystallinity of TiO2 nanotubes in this study, and XRD measurement was enough to detect gold deposited on TiO2 nanotubes, even though the grafted amounts of GNR were small as shown by the results of elementary analysis (EDX).

750813.fig.004
Figure 4: X-ray diffraction patterns of GNR-grafted 100 nm TiO2 nanotubes treated by 0.1 M thiolactic acid.

Figure 5 shows the elution concentrations of tetracycline loaded at the surface of GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes after 30 s of IR light irradiation with a near-IR laser. The release concentrations of tetracycline from GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes with IR light irradiation (μg/mL) were significantly higher than those from other experimental conditions, such as TiO2 nanotubes with or without IR light irradiation and GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes without IR laser irradiation ().

fig5
Figure 5: (a) Near-IR laser and IR light irradiation and (b) the concentration of tetracycline released by IR light irradiation (NT, NT + IR, GNT, and GNT + IR in the graph designate TiO2 nanotubes only, near-IR laser irradiated TiO2 nanotubes, GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes, and near-IR laser irradiated GNR grafted TiO2 nanotubes, resp.). *denotes significance between groups ().

Figure 6 demonstrates the zone index results of antibacterial agar diffusion test with GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes after 1 min of IR light irradiation with a near-IR laser. In this examination, negative (sterilized filter paper only) and positive (3 μL tetracycline loaded filter paper) control groups were adopted to compare the values of experimental groups. The zone index of annihilated Streptococcus mutans of GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes with IR light irradiation ( cm) was significantly higher than that of GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes without IR light irradiation ( cm) (). In addition, GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes without IR light irradiation showed the annihilation effect of Streptococcus mutans regardless of IR light irradiation. This phenomenon is supposed to be the long period of second incubation after plating experimental specimen. GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes including the mixture of PLA and tetracycline were contacted with Streptococcus mutans during second incubation period. Therefore, 24 h of second incubation is seemed to be enough to kill the bacterium, even though the release amount of tetracycline is small. Further investigation will be performed to clarify on-off drug release remotely controlled by IR light irradiation.

fig6
Figure 6: (a) Photographs of antibacterial agar diffusion test by using Streptococcus mutans and (b) the results of zone diameter of dead Streptococcus mutans on the conditions of negative control, positive control, GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes without IR light irradiation (designated GNT) and with IR light irradiation for 1 min (designated GNT + IR). * and ** denote significance between groups ().

Rod-shaped GNR are well known to mediate photodynamic effects at near infrared light and tune the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) band from the visible to near IR wavelength by modifying the aspect ratio of GNR [22, 3436]. In addition to photodynamic cancer therapy, the nanomaterial-mediated photothermal therapy of GNR plays an important role in combining the therapeutic effect with photodynamic therapy to achieve cancer treatment. The main goal of this research was to detach antibiotics deposited on TiO2 nanotubes by IR laser irradiation based on the photodynamic and photothermal effects of GNR. In particular, the photothermal effect of GNR was expected predominantly to affect elution of drugs from TiO2 nanotubes remotely by near-IR laser.

4. Conclusions

From the results of this research, we can surmise that covalent immobilization of GNR on TiO2 nanotubes via a grafting technique was performed successfully by thiolactic acid treatment. Moreover, we confirm that tetracycline stored in GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes was released effectively by IR light irradiation with a near-IR laser, even though the amount of gold grafted at the surface of TiO2 nanotubes was less than 12 wt%. Therefore, we conclude that GNR-grafted TiO2 nanotubes can be expected to extend the limited usage of TiO2 showing photocatalytic activity within the UV to IR region, thereby facilitating the development of novel fusion technologies in the field of implantation materials.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011-0024067).

References

  1. L. Le Guéhennec, A. Soueidan, P. Layrolle, and Y. Amouriq, “Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration,” Dental Materials, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 844–854, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Junker, A. Dimakis, M. Thoneick, and J. A. Jansen, “Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 185–206, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. A. Puleo and A. Nanci, “Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface,” Biomaterials, vol. 20, no. 23-24, pp. 2311–2321, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Dettin, M. T. Conconi, R. Gambaretto et al., “Effect of synthetic peptides on osteoblast adhesion,” Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 22, pp. 4507–4515, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. I. Axel, W. Kunert, C. Göggelmann et al., “Paclitaxel inhibits arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration in vitro and in vivo using local drug delivery,” Circulation, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 636–645, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. Greenstein and A. Polson, “The role of local drug delivery in the management of periodontal diseases: a comprehensive review,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 507–520, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. R. Naik, S. K. Desai, P. D. Shah, and S. M. Wala, “Liposomes as potential carrier system for targeted delivery of polyene antibiotics,” Recent Patents on Inflammation & Allergy Drug Discovery, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 202–214, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. J. Sawyer, D. Wesolowski, N. Gandotra et al., “A peptide-morpholino oligomer conjugate targeting Staphylococcus aureus gyrA mRNA improves healing in an infected mouse cutaneous wound model,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Gao and J. Xu, “Important biology events and pathways in Brucella infection and implications for novel antibiotic drug targets,” Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 65–76, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Gulati, M. S. Aw, and D. Losic, “Drug-eluting Ti wires with titania nanotube arrays for bone fixation and reduced bone infection,” Nanoscale Research Letters, vol. 6, article 571, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Liu, T. H. Bugge, and S. H. Leppla, “Targeting of tumor cells by cell surface urokinase plasminogen activator-dependent anthrax toxin,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 21, pp. 17976–17984, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Liu and A. Chen, “Coadsorption of horseradish peroxidase with thionine on TiO2 nanotubes for biosensing,” Langmuir, vol. 21, no. 18, pp. 8409–8413, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Paulose, K. Shankar, S. Yoriya et al., “Anodic growth of highly ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays to 134 μm in length,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 33, pp. 16179–16184, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. Zhang, P. Liu, X. Liu et al., “Fabrication of highly ordered TiO2 nanorod/nanotube adjacent arrays for photoelectrochemical applications,” Langmuir, vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 11226–11232, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. Shankar, G. K. Mor, H. E. Prakasam, O. K. Varghese, and C. A. Grimes, “Self-assembled hybrid polymer-TiO2 nanotube array heterojunction solar cells,” Langmuir, vol. 23, no. 24, pp. 12445–12449, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Bigerelle, K. Anselme, B. Noël, I. Ruderman, P. Hardouin, and A. Iost, “Improvement in the morphology of Ti-based surfaces: a new process to increase in vitro human osteoblast response,” Biomaterials, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1563–1577, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. B. D. Boyan, T. W. Hummert, D. D. Dean, and Z. Schwartz, “Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response,” Biomaterials, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 137–146, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. G. Galbraith and M. P. Sheetz, “Forces on adhesive contacts affect cell function,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 566–571, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. L. Linsebigler, G. Lu, and J. T. Yates Jr., “Photocatalysis on TiO2 surfaces: principles, mechanisms, and selected results,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 735–758, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Choi, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 69–96, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Oh, K. S. Moon, J. H. Moon, J. M. Bae, and S. Jin, “Visible light irradiation-mediated drug elution activity of nitrogen-doped TiO2 nanotubes,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2013, Article ID 802318, 7 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. Chen, X. Wang, X. Yao, X. Zheng, J. Wang, and X. Jiang, “Near-IR-triggered photothermal/photodynamic dual-modality therapy system via chitosan hybrid nanospheres,” Biomaterials, vol. 34, no. 33, pp. 8314–8322, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. P. Joshi, S. J. Yoon, Y. S. Chen, S. Emelianov, and K. V. Sokolov, “Development and optimization of near-IR contrast agents for immune cell tracking,” Biomedical Optics Express, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 2609–2618, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. Choi, J. Yang, D. Bang et al., “Targetable gold nanorods for epithelial cancer therapy guided by near-IR absorption imaging,” Small, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 746–753, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. T. Robinson, K. Welsher, S. M. Tabakman et al., “High performance in vivo near-IR (>1 μm) imaging and photothermal cancer therapy with carbon nanotubes,” Nano Research, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 779–793, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. Sada, T. Fujigaya, Y. Niidome, K. Nakazawa, and N. Nakashima, “Near-IR laser-triggered target cell collection using a carbon nanotube-based cell-cultured substrate,” ACS Nano, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 4414–4421, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. Guo, L. Zhang, H. Qian, R. Li, X. Jiang, and B. Liu, “Multifunctional nanocarriers for cell imaging, drug delivery, and near-IR photothermal therapy,” Langmuir, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 5428–5434, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Z. Landau, M. Migdal, A. Lipovsky, and R. Lubart, “Visible light-induced healing of diabetic or venous foot ulcers: a placebo-controlled double-blind study,” Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 399–404, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. Yeonmi and L. Seonghoon, “Self-organized regular arrays of anodic TiO2 nanotubes,” Nano Letters, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 3171–3173, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. H. Liao and J. H. Hafner, “Gold nanorod bioconjugates,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 17, no. 18, pp. 4636–4641, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. C. Ratanatawanate, A. Chyao, and K. J. Balkus, “S-nitrosocysteine-decorated PbS QDs/TiO2 nanotubes for enhanced production of singlet oxygen,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 10, pp. 3492–3497, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. Ratanatawanate, C. Xiong, and K. J. Balkus Jr., “Fabrication of PbS quantum dot doped TiO2 nanotubes,” ACS Nano, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 1682–1688, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. V. Sebastián, S. K. Lee, C. Zhou, M. F. Kraus, J. G. Fujimoto, and K. F. Jensen, “One-step continuous synthesis of biocompatible gold nanorods for optical coherence tomography,” Chemical Communications, vol. 48, no. 53, pp. 6654–6656, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. B. Wang, J. H. Wang, Q. Liu et al., “Rose-bengal-conjugated gold nanorods for in vivo photodynamic and photothermal oral cancer therapies,” Biomaterials, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1954–1966, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  35. B. Jang, J. Park, C. Tung, I. Kim, and Y. Choi, “Gold nanorod-photosensitizer complex for near-infrared fluorescence imaging and photodynamic/photothermal therapy in vivo,” ACS Nano, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1086–1094, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. Jelveh and D. B. Chithrani, “Gold nanostructures as a platform for combinational therapy in future cancer therapeutics,” Cancers, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1081–1110, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus