Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2015, Article ID 191793, 5 pages
Research Article

Properties and Photocatalytic Activity of β-Ga2O3 Nanorods under Simulated Solar Irradiation

Laboratory of Quantum Engineering and Quantum Materials, School of Physics & Telecommunication Engineering, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China

Received 30 November 2014; Accepted 28 January 2015

Academic Editor: Yongchun Hong

Copyright © 2015 Yinzhen Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


β-Ga2O3 nanorods are prepared by hydrothermal method and characterized by X-ray diffraction, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and photoluminescence spectra. The results reveal that high crystallinity, monoclinic phase of β-Ga2O3 nanorods were prepared with a diameter of about 60 nm and length of 500 nm. Photoluminescence study indicates that the β-Ga2O3 nanorods exhibit a broad blue light emission at room temperature. The β-Ga2O3 nanorods displayed high photocatalytic activity under simulated solar irradiation; after 2 h irradiation, over 95% of methylene blue solution and over 90% of methyl orange solution were decolorized. Since this process does not require additional hydrogen peroxide and uses solar light, it can be developed as an economically feasible and environmentally friendly method to treat dye effluent.

1. Introduction

Organic dyes are common pollutants in industrial wastewaters which cannot be degraded and thus result in potentially severe environmental problems. Various physical, chemical, and biological techniques have been developed to degrade them. Heterogeneous photocatalysis using semiconductors has attracted much attention due to its ability to decolorize dye-containing wastewater [1, 2], which has proven to be a green technology for the degradation of organic pollutants. This process can mineralize organic dyes completely into H2O, CO2, and other nontoxic inorganic compounds without producing secondary pollution. One of such commonly used semiconductors is β-Ga2O3, which has a wide bandgap (Eg = 4.9 eV). In particular, its one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures, such as nanowires [3, 4], nanoribbons [5], and nanorods [610], have attracted much attention due to their unique nanostructures and photocatalytic properties. To be more specific, due to the strong redox ability of photogenerated electron-hole pairs [7, 8, 11], β-Ga2O3 exhibits high and stable photocatalytic activity over commercial TiO2. When exposed to light irradiation, different phases of Ga2O3 possess extraordinary photocatalytic ability of dye and volatile organic compounds [714]. Moreover, β-Ga2O3 is also an environmentally friendly material according to WorkSafe Australia criteria.

In this study, β-Ga2O3 nanorods are synthesized by the hydrothermal method and subsequent heat treatments. The physical properties of the products are characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), selected area electron diffraction (SAED), Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and photoluminescence (PL) spectra. Photocatalytic activity of as-prepared nanorods is evaluated by degrading methylene blue (MB) and methyl orange (MO) in aqueous suspensions under simulated solar light irradiation. The performance of this degrading method is found to be very good. In particular, it requires no hydrogen peroxide, and thus it is economically feasible and environmentally friendly.

2. Experimental

The β-Ga2O3 nanorods are prepared by hydrothermal method. Ga(NO3)3·9H2O, urea, and polyethylene glycol-200 (PEG) are used as starting materials, all of which are of analytical pure grade (99.9%). Our experiment goes as follows. First, 0.01 mol Ga(NO3)3·9H2O, 0.1 mol urea, and PEG are dissolved in deionized water and then stirred vigorously using a magnetic stirrer for 1 h at room temperature. Second, the solution is transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave (400 mL in capacity) and hydrothermally reacted at 160°C for 8 h. Third, the obtained product is separated by centrifugation and washed repeatedly with alcohol and distilled water to remove the unreacted ions, by-products, organic impurities, and so forth. Then, the material is dried under 100°C for 24 h. Finally, the obtained product is calcined at 800°C for 10 h in muffle furnace to obtain desired β-Ga2O3 nanorods.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows XRD pattern of β-Ga2O3 nanorods. All of the diffraction peaks of the XRD patterns are in agreement with those of monoclinic phase of β-Ga2O3 (JCPDS: 41–1103). Moreover, no other diffraction peaks are found, indicating that the product is predominantly in single β-Ga2O3 phase with high purity. The sharp diffraction peaks also reveal that the prepared sample has a high crystalline quality.

Figure 1: XRD patterns of β-Ga2O3 nanorods.

Figure 2 shows the TEM images of the β-Ga2O3 nanorods. It can be observed from Figures 2(a) and 2(b) that the prepared nanorods have a diameter of about 60 nm and length of 500 nm with dense hole on their surface. The pores might be formed during the recrystallization process or elimination of water from constitutional OH groups [15]. The porous nature of this semiconductor material should be useful to improve the photocatalytic activity. Figure 2(c) presents the corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern, which reveals the crystalline monoclinic structure of β-Ga2O3 and is consistent with the XRD result. The corresponding EDX data shown in Figure 2(d) indicates that they are composed of Ga and O. The C peaks are due to the contamination from the carbon coated copper grids when preparing HRTEM specimens. The molecular ratio of Ga and O of the nanorods was found to be 2 : 3, which is close to that of the β-Ga2O3 crystal.

Figure 2: (a) TEM images of β-Ga2O3 nanorods, (b) TEM image of a single β-Ga2O3, (c) SAED patterns, and (d) EDS spectrum of the β-Ga2O3 nanorods.

Figure 3 shows the Raman spectra of β-Ga2O3 nanorods using a 514.5 nm Ar ion laser as the excitation source. The peaks are very sharp and narrow indicating the high crystalline quality of the prepared sample. Raman spectrum can be divided into three groups named low frequency mode (below 200 cm−1), mid frequency mode (500–300 cm−1), and high frequency mode (770–500 cm−1), all of which are related to different vibrational modes [16]. The eight Raman vibration peaks 169, 199, 345, 415, 474, 562, 651, and 765 cm−1 are visible, as shown in Figure 3. The Raman bands observed at 169 and 199 cm−1 are due to libration of Ga-O chains; the Raman bands at 345, 415, and 474 cm−1 belong to deformation of GaI(OI)2 octahedra; the Raman bands observed at 562, 651, and 765 cm−1 are related to symmetric stretching bands of GaO4 tetrahedra. No peak corresponding to organic impurities is found as in the XRD pattern.

Figure 3: Raman spectra of β-Ga2O3 nanorods.

Figure 4 shows the XPS spectra of β-Ga2O3 nanorods. The XPS spectrum indicates that the chemical composition of the particles mainly includes O, Ga, and C. The C peaks come mainly from the atmospheric contamination due to the sample exposure to the air. The XPS spectra of O 1s and Ga 3d are shown in Figures 5(a) and 5(b), respectively. The binding energies of the Ga 3d and O 1s are 531.5 eV and 20.8 eV.

Figure 4: XPS spectra of β-Ga2O3 nanorods.
Figure 5: XPS spectra of Ga 3d (a) and O 1s (b).

Figure 6 shows the excitation and emission spectra of the as-prepared β-Ga2O3 nanorods at room temperature. The excitation peaks are located at 281 nm and 376 nm under the emission of 441 nm. The emission spectrum shows a broad emission band under a 281 nm or 376 nm excitation, which has been observed with PL spectra in Ga2O3 [1719], due to the oxygen vacancy () and gallium-oxygen vacancy pairs (, ) in the Ga2O3 [20]. Besides, the asymmetric emission band shape can be explained by the electron-phonon interaction in the substances [21]. The major emission band can be separated into three Gaussian bands centered at about 419, 442, and 470 nm, respectively.

Figure 6: Excitation (a) and emission (b) spectra of β-Ga2O3 nanorods.

The photocatalytic activity of β-Ga2O3 nanorods is evaluated by the photocatalytic degradation of dye under simulated solar irradiation. The degradation trend of 10 mgL−1 MB and MO solution as a function of irradiation time is shown in Figure 7. The degradation rate increases as the irradiation time increases. After 4 h of simulated solar irradiation, the degradation rate of MB and MO reaches 95.32% and 90.47%, respectively. The photocatalytic properties in the degradation of the dye of the Ga2O3 nanorods suggest that the samples should have valuable application in water treatment.

Figure 7: Degradation trend of MB (a) and MO (b) as a function of irradiation time.

4. Conclusions

The β-Ga2O3 nanorods are prepared by hydrothermal method. Results of the XRD, TEM, Raman, and XPS analysis indicate that the high crystallinity, monoclinic phase, and purity of β-Ga2O3 nanorods were achieved. PL shows that the intense blue emission at room temperature can be attributed to oxygen vacancy () and gallium-oxygen vacancy pairs (, ). The photocatalytic degradation ability of β-Ga2O3 nanostructures toward photodegradation of MB and MO under simulated solar irradiation showed that nanorods have superior degradation efficiency. The results suggest that β-Ga2O3 nanorods are very promising photocatalysts for degrading dye wastewater treatment under simulated solar irradiation.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work was supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (nos. 11474104 and 51372092) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (no. 2012M511801).


  1. U. G. Akpan and B. H. Hameed, “Parameters affecting the photocatalytic degradation of dyes using TiO2-based photocatalysts: a review,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 520–529, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Makita and A. Harata, “Photocatalytic decolorization of rhodamine B dye as a model of dissolved organic compounds: Influence of dissolved inorganic chloride salts in seawater of the Sea of Japan,” Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 859–863, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. H. Liang, G. W. Meng, G. Z. Wang, Y. W. Wang, L. D. Zhang, and S. Y. Zhang, “Catalytic synthesis and photoluminescence of β-Ga2O3 nanowires,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 78, no. 21, pp. 3202–3204, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. H. Mohamed, M. El Hagary, and S. Althoyaib, “Growth of β-Ga2O3 nanowires and their photocatalytic and optical properties using Pt as a catalyst,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 537, pp. 291–296, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Fu, Y. Liu, P. Hu, K. Xiao, G. Yu, and D. Zhu, “Ga2O3 nanoribbons: synthesis, characterization, and electronic properties,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 15, no. 22, pp. 4287–4291, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. Y. H. Gao, Y. Bando, T. Sato, Y. F. Zhang, and X. Q. Gao, “Synthesis, Raman scattering and defects of β-Ga2O3 nanorods,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 81, no. 12, article 2267, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. Y. Hou, J. Zhang, Z. Ding, and L. Wu, “Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of β-Ga2O3 nanostructures,” Powder Technology, vol. 203, no. 3, pp. 440–446, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Girija, S. Thirumalairajan, A. K. Patra, D. Mangalaraj, N. Ponpandian, and C. Viswanathan, “Enhanced photocatalytic performance of novel self-assembled floral β-Ga2O3 nanorods,” Current Applied Physics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 652–658, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. K. Girija, S. Thirumalairajan, A. K. Patra, D. Mangalaraj, N. Ponpandian, and C. Viswanathan, “Organic additives assisted synthesis of mesoporous β-Ga2O3 nanostructures for photocatalytic dye degradation,” Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 3, Article ID 035015, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W. Zhao, Y. Yang, R. Hao et al., “Synthesis of mesoporous β-Ga2O3 nanorods using PEG as template: preparation, characterization and photocatalytic properties,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 192, no. 3, pp. 1548–1554, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Hou, X. Wang, L. Wu, Z. Ding, and X. Fu, “Efficient decomposition of benzene over a β-Ga2O3 photocatalyst under ambient conditions,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 40, no. 18, pp. 5799–5803, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Muruganandham, R. Amutha, M. S. M. A. Wahed et al., “Controlled fabrication of α-GaOOH and α-Ga2O3 self-assembly and its superior photocatalytic activity,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 44–53, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L.-C. Tien, W.-T. Chen, and C.-H. Ho, “Enhanced photocatalytic activity in β-Ga2O3 nanobelts,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 3117–3122, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. D. Hou, L. Wu, X. C. Wang, Z. X. Ding, Z. H. Li, and X. Z. Fu, “Photocatalytic performance of α-, β-, and γ-Ga2O3 for the destruction of volatile aromatic pollutants in air,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 250, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. A. Cüneyt Taş, P. J. Majewski, and F. Aldinger, “Synthesis of gallium oxide hydroxide crystals in aqueous solutions with or without urea and their calcination behavior,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1421–1429, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. I. López, A. D. Utrilla, E. Nogales et al., “In-doped gallium oxide micro- and nanostructures: morphology, structure, and luminescence properties,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 3935–3943, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. T. Zhang, J. Lin, X. Zhang et al., “Single-crystalline spherical β-Ga2O3 particles: synthesis, N-doping and photoluminescence properties,” Journal of Luminescence, vol. 140, pp. 30–37, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. Ifeacho, H. Wiggers, C. Schulz, L. Schneider, and G. Bacher, “Ga2O3 nanoparticles synthesized in a low-pressure flame reactor,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 121–127, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. Binet and D. Gourier, “Origin of the blue luminescence of β-Ga2O3,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 1241–1249, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. P. Song, H. Z. Zhang, C. Lin et al., “Luminescence emission originating from nitrogen doping of β−Ga2O3 nanowires,” Physical Review B, vol. 69, Article ID 075304, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. T. Arai and S. Adachi, “Photoluminescence properties of SnO2·H2O phosphor,” ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. R15–R21, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus