Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2015, Article ID 201420, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/201420
Research Article

Substrate-Dependent Differences in the Crystal Structures and Optical Properties of ZnSe Nanowires

1Department of Physics, Kyonggi University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 443-760, Republic of Korea
2School of Advanced Device Engineering, University of Science & Technology, 217 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-350, Republic of Korea
3Nano Electron-Source Creative Research Center, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, 218 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-700, Republic of Korea
4Department of Applied Physics and Institute of Nanoscience and Biotechnology, Dankook University, Yongin 448-701, Republic of Korea

Received 20 August 2015; Accepted 21 September 2015

Academic Editor: Magnus Willander

Copyright © 2015 Keumyoung Seo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The optical and structural properties of ZnSe nanowires directly grown on three different substrates, SiO2, ITO, and graphene, were investigated. ZnSe nanowires grown on graphene and SiO2 were found to have cubic structures, while ZnSe nanowires grown on ITO had a mixed cubic and hexagonal structure. The main peaks in the photoluminescence spectra of ZnSe nanowires grown on SiO2, ITO, and graphene were located at 459, 627, and 627/460 nm, respectively. In addition, a field-emission light-emitting device was fabricated using ZnSe nanowires as a phosphor and graphene as an electrode. The device showed a red emission peak with Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage coordinates of (0.621, 0.315).

1. Introduction

One-dimensional single-crystal nanowires have large aspect ratios (length-to-width ratio) and exhibit a variety of interesting electrical and optical properties not observed in conventional bulk and thin film materials. These properties have led to the recent application of nanowires in conceptually new transistors, displays, lasers, photodetectors, and photovoltaic devices [13]. In particular, recent efforts to develop flexible and/or transparent displays have included research into developing light-emitting diodes (LEDs), field-emitting displays (FEDs), and electroluminescence (EL) devices with nanowires [46]. Indium tin oxide (ITO) and indium zinc oxide (IZO) are the materials currently being used for transparent electrodes, which are essential to the development of transparent displays. However, ITO and IZO materials have several limitations: they are available in limited quantities and their poor flexibilities lead to cracking, which deteriorates and reduces device reliabilities. To overcome these limitations, several studies have investigated transparent electrodes made from graphene thin films [79]. Graphene is a two-dimensional carbon nanomaterial. Recently, it has attracted increased attention as a possible electrode material for use in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), solar cells, touch screens, and nanogenerators because of its outstanding properties, such as high electron mobility, transparency, conductivity, and flexibility [1012].

ZnSe nanowires are excellent candidates for novel optoelectronic and electronic devices because they have a wide direct band gap of 2.7 eV at 300 K and large surface-to-volume ratios. ZnSe nanowires are particularly suitable for use in applications such as diode lasers, light-emitting diodes, and photodetectors [1315]. Because of their numerous applications, the structural and optical properties of ZnSe nanowires grown on Si, Al2O3, and SiO2 substrates have been previously investigated. Several studies have explored the growth of , SiC, and In2O3 nanowires on graphene [1618] but none has studied the direct growth of ZnSe nanowires on graphene. Thus, observations of the crystal and optical properties of ZnSe nanowires grown on graphene thin films are of particular interest. The advantage of growing nanowires directly on graphene is that it facilitates the formation of Ohmic contacts between the nanowires and graphene [17, 18]. In addition, hybrid graphene-ZnSe nanowire structures could be used in flexible and/or transparent displays.

This study presents a comparative analysis of ZnSe nanowires grown directly on graphene and those grown on SiO2 and ITO. The crystal and optical characteristics of ZnSe nanowires grown on graphene were examined using photoluminescence (PL), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM). In addition, a field-emission light-emitting device was fabricated using a ZnSe nanowire phosphor and transparent graphene electrodes to verify the luminescence properties of the ZnSe nanowires.

2. Materials and Methods

ZnSe nanowires were grown on three different substrates, SiO2, ITO, and graphene, by chemical vapor deposition (CVD). SiO2 was thermally grown to a thickness of 300 nm on a Si wafer. An ITO thin film (with a thickness of ~100 nm) was deposited on a quartz wafer using the radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering method. Graphene was grown on copper (Cu) foil (Sigma-Aldrich, 25 μm thick) and then transferred to a quartz wafer. Graphene was grown by placing the Cu foil in a CVD chamber with 100 sccm of H2 gas and held at 1020°C for 90 min. 20 sccm of CH4 gas was then passed through the chamber for another 30 min. The temperature of the CVD chamber was reduced at a rate of 150°C/min. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) was then coated onto the graphene grown on the Cu foil and the Cu was removed using a wet-etching process. Subsequently, the graphene/PMMA was transferred to a quartz substrate and 20 sccm of Ar gas was passed through the vacuum (7.7 × 10−2 Torr) at 400°C for 20 min to remove the PMMA. By repeating the transfer process five times, a five-layer graphene thin film on a quartz substrate was obtained. Au seed dispersion was achieved by placing a drop of Au seed solution, diluted to a volume ratio of 15 : 1 (IPA : Au colloid), on each substrate, namely, SiO2, ITO, and graphene. Au-coated SiO2, ITO, and graphene substrates, together with ZnSe (Sigma Aldrich, 99.995%) powder, were placed in zones 1 and 2 of the CVD chamber. The temperatures of zones 1 and 2 were increased to 620°C and 920°C, respectively, and 90 sccm of Ar gas was passed through the chamber for 30 min to grow the ZnSe nanowires.

Low-temperature PL measurements were taken over a temperature range of 6–300 K by mounting samples on the cold-finger of a closed-cycle refrigerator. A 50 cm spectrometer equipped with a liquid nitrogen cooled charge coupled device (2048 × 512 pixels) was used to record PL spectra. PL emissions were observed across the entire spectral range using a 150 line/mm (resolution ~1.3 meV) ruled grating and in the band-edge region using a 1200 line/mm (resolution ~0.1 meV) ruled grating. A 325 nm He-Cd laser was used to excite the ZnSe nanowires.

Figure 1 shows field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) images of ZnSe nanowires grown on SiO2, ITO, and 5-layered graphene, as well as optical images of the light-emitting states of the ZnSe nanowires when illuminated by ultraviolet (UV) light (365 nm, 8 W). The ZnSe nanowires were successfully grown on the three different substrates, showing no signs of flakes or particles. The average diameters of the ZnSe nanowires were between 20 and 60 nm and the average lengths were greater than 5 μm. As shown in the optical images of the light emissions of the ZnSe nanowires grown on 1 × 1 inch substrates, under UV illumination ZnSe nanowires on thin film SiO2 were not luminescent, whereas ZnSe nanowires on thin film ITO exhibited a reddish-orange luminescence. The ZnSe nanowires on graphene also showed a reddish-orange luminescence, which was restricted to the area of graphene covered in ZnSe nanowires.

Figure 1: FE-SEM images of ZnSe nanowires grown on (a) SiO2, (b) ITO, and (c) graphene. The insets show optical luminescence images of samples under UV illumination.

To identify the crystallographic differences between the ZnSe nanowires grown on thin films of SiO2, ITO, and graphene, XRD analysis was performed (Figure 2(a)). Figure 2(a) shows that the ZnSe nanowires on both SiO2 and graphene had cubic structures ( = 5.66882). The main peaks of those nanowires were (111), (220), (311), (400), and (331), located at 27.2°, 45.2°, 53.6°, 65.8°, and 72.6°, respectively (JCPDS 37-1463). On the other hand, the ZnSe nanowires grown on ITO demonstrated peaks from both cubic ( = 5.66882) and hexagonal ( = 3.974, = 6.506) structures. In addition to the peaks of the cubic-structured ZnSe nanowires seen in samples grown on SiO2 and graphene, ZnSe nanowires grown in ITO demonstrated the (100), (101), (102), (103), (203), and (105) peaks of hexagonal-structured ZnSe nanowires at 25.6°, 29.0°, 37.7°, 49.2°, 69.1°, and 77.7°, respectively (JCPDS 80-0008). The (222), (400), (440), and (622) peaks observed at 30.8°, 35.7°, 51.4°, and 61.1°, respectively (not shown in this figure), match the peaks of the ITO substrate (JCPDS 6-0416).

Figure 2: (a) XRD patterns of ZnSe nanowires grown on SiO2, ITO, and graphene. (b) Representative HR-TEM images of ZnSe nanowires grown on SiO2, ITO, and graphene.

Figure 2(b) shows HR-TEM images of ZnSe nanowires grown on thin films of SiO2, ITO, and graphene. Similar to the XRD results, these images show that the ZnSe nanowires grown on thin film SiO2 had a cubic structure and a growth direction of . In contrast, the ZnSe nanowires grown on thin film ITO had both hexagonal structure characteristics, demonstrating a growth direction of , and cubic structure characteristics, demonstrating a growth direction of . In other words, the ZnSe nanowires grown on ITO exhibited two different crystalline structures and growth directions, whereas the ZnSe nanowires grown on SiO2 showed a single crystalline structure and growth direction. Although the ZnSe nanowires grown on graphene had a primarily cubic structure and growth direction (similar to ZnSe nanowires on SiO2), some areas of the sample showed a twinned structure.

Figure 3 presents low-temperature PL spectra measured at 6 K. As shown in Figure 3(a), at the band edge, blue luminescence (centered at 2.70 eV (459 nm)) dominated the red luminescence (centered at 1.98 eV (625 nm)) of the ZnSe nanowires grown on SiO2. The most intense peak of the ZnSe nanowires fabricated on SiO2 was at 2.6981 eV and is associated with a donor-acceptor pair (DAP) transition. Lower-energy shoulder peaks, observed at 2.6668, 2.6355, and 2.6042 eV, correspond to longitudinal optical (LO) phonon replicas of donor-acceptor pairs (DAPs) and were spaced 31.3 meV apart. Figure 3(b) shows an expanded view of the higher energy side-peaks, wherein the I1 and I2 peaks, as well as the free exciton (broken arrow) peak that was observed as a small bump in the spectrum at 2.8014 eV, are resolved [19, 20]. It is known that I2 lines, which are associated with excitons bound to neutral donors, can be found only in crystal of the highest quality [21]. An exciton bound to a neutral acceptor is responsible for the I1 transition as well as its LO phonon replica (I1-LO) at 2.7525 eV. Assignments of these sharp band-edge features were based on characteristics of a uniform and defect-free zinc-blende cubic structure [22, 23]. These assumptions were confirmed by the XRD and HR-TEM results shown in Figure 2. In the case of the ZnSe nanowires grown on ITO, the main peak was located at 1.977 eV (627 nm) and lacked any band-edge transitions. The broad spectral feature centered at 627 nm is associated with a self-activated emission due to donors and deep acceptor pair transitions resulting from Zn-vacancies or interstitial states [15, 24]. In our case, such vacancies or interstitial states may be the result of crystal interfaces between hexagonal and cubic lattices, as shown in Figure 2(b). Such mixed phases deteriorate crystal quality and prevent PL emissions from having sharp band-edge structures.

Figure 3: (a) PL spectra of ZnSe nanowires grown on SiO2, ITO, and graphene. (b) Expanded view of the high-energy side of the PL spectrum of ZnSe nanowires grown on SiO2.

On the other hand, the main transition peaks of the ZnSe nanowires grown on graphene had two distinct regions, namely, a band-edge related peak at 2.695 eV (460 nm) and a broad feature at 1.977 eV (627 nm). Unlike ZnSe nanowires grown on ITO, ZnSe nanowires grown on graphene had a single-phase cubic zinc-blende structure. However, it also demonstrated a twinned structure, as shown in Figure 2(b). Comparable to the ZnSe nanowires grown on graphene here, twinned structure ZnSe nanowires grown on alumina and Si substrates have been shown to have strong red emissions and relatively weak band-edge emissions [25, 26].

In addition, we verified that ZnSe nanowires grown on graphene can be used in light-emitting devices. Analyzing the optical emission processes of ZnSe nanowires should facilitate the development of ZnSe nanowire-based light-emitting devices. Figure 4(a) presents field-emission current densities as a function of the electric field applied to the device. As illustrated in Figure 4(a), electricity started to flow when the electric field was 1.5 V/μm and the field-emission current density increased exponentially as the electric field was increased to 2.2 V/μm. When the applied field was equal to 2.2 V/μm, the emission current density was ~30 μA/cm2. The field-emission- (FE-) current-voltage characteristics were obtained using the Fowler-Nordheim equation, , where is current density, is applied electric field, is 1.56 × 10−10 (AV−2eV), is 6.83 × 103 (VeV−3/2μm−1), is the work function of the ZnSe emitting material (4.84 eV) [27], and is the field-enhancement factor, which is related to emitter geometry, crustal structure, and spatial distribution of the emitting centers [28]. Note that was extracted from the slope of a ln() versus () plot. The value was ~7,250, which is higher than those previously reported for ZnSe nanoribbons (~1382) [29], ZnO nanoneedles on plastic substrates (~1134) [30], and carbon nanotubes on polyamide (~850) [31]. These results indicate that ZnSe FEDs with graphene electrodes could be used to fabricate novel FE devices. The inset of Figure 4(a) illustrates a schematic of a FED structure employing ZnSe nanowires grown on graphene. Carbon nanotube (CNT)/ITO and ZnSe nanowire/graphene materials were used as the emitter/cathode and phosphor/anode, respectively. Note that the sheet resistance of the graphene electrode was ~2.0 kΩ/sq. The field-emission properties of the device were measured in a diode configuration, using a 500 μm gap between the anode and cathode. During measurements, the pressure was maintained at ~1.5 × 10−6 Torr.

Figure 4: (a) Field-emission current versus applied electric field for a FED device constructed of ZnSe nanowires on graphene. The inset shows a schematic of the field-emitting structure used, which employs CNT/ITO and ZnSe nanowire/graphene as its emitter/cathode and phosphor/anode, respectively. (b) Light-emission luminance graph of a ZnSe nanowire phosphor on graphene. Insets are optical images of the red light emissions of the ZnSe/graphene device. Peak emission occurred at ~627 nm.

Figure 4(b) shows the brightness of ZnSe nanowire/graphene as a function of emission current. Figure 4(b) shows that the brightness of the ZnSe nanowire phosphor emissions increased from 20 to 80 cd/m2 when the emission current was increased from 20 to 100 μA. The luminous efficiency was 0.87 lm/W at 2.2 kV/mm, higher than that reported for SrTiO3 : Pr3+ (0.4 lm/W) [32]. The insets in Figure 4(b) show images of the light emissions of the device at each applied emission current, the size of the area imaged being ~10 × 20 mm. The emission spectrum of the ZnSe nanowires shows an emission peak at ~627 nm. The average corresponding Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage (CIE) coordinates for the device are (0.621, 0.315).

3. Conclusions

In summary, ZnSe nanowires of varying crystallinity and luminescent properties were synthesized on three different substrates, SiO2, ITO, and graphene. XRD and HR-TEM analyses revealed that the ZnSe nanowires grown on SiO2 and graphene by CVD, using Au catalyst, had single-phase, cubic structures. On the other hand, the ZnSe nanowires grown on ITO showed the presence of both cubic and hexagonal structures. Furthermore, PL results for ZnSe nanowires on SiO2 and ITO exhibited remarkably high peaks at 2.701 eV (459 nm) and 1.977 eV (627 nm), respectively, whereas those of ZnSe nanowires on graphene showed red luminescence at approximately 1.977 eV (627 nm) and a blue peak at 2.695 eV (460 nm). A FED device was fabricated with light-emitting ZnSe nanowires on graphene. The fabricated FED device showed a red emission peak at ~627 nm with CIE coordinates of (0.621, 0.315). Based on these experimental results, it is highly probable that a hybrid device made from nanowires and graphene could provide an effective means for developing highly functional and efficient light-emitting displays.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (no. 2014R1A2A1A11049450). This work at Dankook University was supported by Leading Foreign Research Institute Recruitment Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) (no. 2014-039452).

References

  1. X. Duan, Y. Huang, R. Agarwal, and C. M. Lieber, “Single-nanowire electrically driven lasers,” Nature, vol. 421, no. 6920, pp. 241–245, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. Tian, X. Zheng, T. J. Kempa et al., “Coaxial silicon nanowires as solar cells and nanoelectronic power sources,” Nature, vol. 449, no. 7164, pp. 885–889, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Ju, A. Facchetti, Y. Xuan et al., “Fabrication of fully transparent nanowire transistors for transparent and flexible electronics,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 378–384, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Ju, J. Li, J. Liu et al., “Transparent active matrix organic light-emitting diode displays driven by nanowire transistor circuitry,” Nano Letters, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 997–1004, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Könenkamp, R. C. Word, and C. Schlegel, “Vertical nanowire light-emitting diode,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85, no. 24, pp. 6004–6006, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M.-C. Jeong, B.-Y. Oh, M.-H. Ham, and J.-M. Myoung, “Electroluminescence from ZnO nanowires in n-ZnO film/ZnO nanowire array/p-GaN film heterojunction light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 88, no. 20, Article ID 202105, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. S. Kim, Y. Zhao, H. Jang et al., “Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes,” Nature, vol. 457, no. 7230, pp. 706–710, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. X. Wang, L. Zhi, and K. Müllen, “Transparent, conductive graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nano Letters, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 323–327, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. X. Li, Y. Zhu, W. Cai et al., “Transfer of large-area graphene films for high-performance transparent conductive electrodes,” Nano Letters, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 4359–4363, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. O. Hwang, J. S. Park, D. S. Choi et al., “Workfunction-tunable, N-doped reduced graphene transparent electrodes for high-performance polymer light-emitting diodes,” ACS Nano, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 159–167, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. F. Bonaccorso, Z. Sun, T. Hasan, and A. C. Ferrari, “Graphene photonics and optoelectronics,” Nature Photonics, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 611–622, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Choi, M.-Y. Choi, W. M. Choi et al., “Fully rollable transparent nanogenerators based on graphene electrodes,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 19, pp. 2187–2192, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Wang, M. Lu, X. Wang et al., “Tuning the p-type conductivity of ZnSe nanowires via silver doping for rectifying and photovoltaic device applications,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1148–1154, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. B. Mirov, V. V. Fedorov, K. Graham, I. S. Moskalev, V. V. Badikov, and V. Panyutin, “Erbium fiber laser-pumped continuous-wave microchip Cr2+:ZnS and Cr2+: ZnSe lasers,” Optics Letters, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 909–911, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y.-C. Zhu and Y. Bando, “Preparation and photoluminescence of single-crystal zinc selenide nanowires,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 377, no. 3-4, pp. 367–370, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. K. Mohseni, A. Behnam, J. D. Wood et al., “InxGa1-xAs nanowire growth on graphene: Van der waals epitaxy induced phase segregation,” Nano Letters, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1153–1161, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. P. Alper, A. Gutes, C. Carraro, and R. Maboudian, “Semiconductor nanowires directly grown on graphene-towards wafer scale transferable nanowire arrays with improved electrical contact,” Nanoscale, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 4114–4118, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Bong, J. Han, J. Lee, S. Kim, and S. Ju, “Fabrication of highly transparent nanowire transistors with one-step-processed graphene gate-source-drain electrodes,” Applied Physics Express, vol. 6, no. 5, Article ID 055103, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. Shibata, A. Ohki, S. Zembutsu, and A. Katsui, “Photoluminescence due to lattice-mismatch defects in high-purity ZnSe layers grown by metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 2: Letters, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 441–443, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. Shahzad, “Excitonic transitions in ZnSe epilayers grown on GaAs,” Physical Review B, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 8309–8312, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. G. Thomas and J. J. Hopfield, “Optical properties of bound exciton complexes in cadmium sulfide,” Physical Review, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 2135–2148, 1962. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. Ye, X. Fang, Y. Wang, P. Yan, J. Zhao, and L. Zhang, “Structural characterization of long ZnSe nanowires,” Applied Physics A, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 113–115, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. H. Hsiao, S. J. Chang, S. B. Wang et al., “ZnSe nanowire photodetector prepared on oxidized silicon substrate by molecular-beam epitaxy,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 156, no. 4, pp. J73–J76, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. Jiang, X.-M. Meng, W.-C. Yiu et al., “Zinc selenide nanoribbons and nanowires,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 9, pp. 2784–2787, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Q. Li, X. Gong, C. Wang, J. Wang, K. Ip, and S. Hark, “Size-dependent periodically twinned ZnSe nanowires,” Advanced Materials, vol. 16, no. 16, pp. 1388–1440, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Y. Q. Wang, U. Philipose, T. Xu, H. E. Ruda, and K. L. Kavanagh, “Twinning modulation in ZnSe nanowires,” Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 175–178, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. K. Swank, “Surface properties of II-VI compounds,” Physical Review, vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 844–849, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Z.-G. Chen, L. Cheng, H.-Y. Xu et al., “ZnS branched architectures as optoelectronic devices and field emitters,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 21, pp. 2376–2380, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. Zhao, Q. Pang, Y. Cai et al., “Vertically aligned zinc selenide nanoribbon arrays: microstructure and field emission,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 3587–3591, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. H. Y. Yang, S. P. Lau, S. F. Yu et al., “Field emission from zinc oxide nanoneedles on plastic substrates,” Nanotechnology, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1300–1303, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Hofmann, C. Ducati, B. Kleinsorge, and J. Robertson, “Direct growth of aligned carbon nanotube field emitter arrays onto plastic substrates,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 83, no. 22, pp. 4661–4663, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H. Yamamoto and S. Okamoto, “Efficiency enhancement by aluminum addition to some oxide phosphors for field emission displays,” Displays, vol. 21, no. 2-3, pp. 93–98, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus