Tuning Electronic Structures of BN and C Double-Wall Hetero-Nanotubes
Table 1
(a) Calculated bond lengths ( and ) in the direction of the tube axis () and in the perpendicular direction (), intertube spacing (), the unit being , the binding energy (), and the forming energy () in kJ/mol of different geometrically optimized armchair double-wall hetero-nanotube optimizations. (b) Calculated bond lengths ( and ) in the perpendicular direction (), intertube spacing (), the unit being , the binding energy ( kJ/mol) and the forming energy ( kJ/mol) kJmol−1, and GGA band gap ( eV) of different geometrically optimized zigzag double-wall hetero-nanotube optimizations. (c) The calculated bond lengths ( and ) of various double-wall hetero-nanotubes, in the direction of the tube axis () and in the perpendicular direction (), and intertube spacing () of different geometrically optimized double-wall hetero-nanotube optimizations; the unit is .