Comparison of Adsorption Capability of Activated Carbon and Metal Doped TiO<sub>2</sub> for Geosmin and 2-MIB Removal from Water

<div>Breakthrough curves for Geosmin and 2-MIB at 18 <svg height="7.56353pt" id="M72" style="vertical-align:-0.3629899pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -7.20054 8.07242 7.56353" width="8.07242pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M556 297V350H337V548H275V350H56V297H275V85H337V297H556ZM556 -23V30H56V-23H556Z" id="g54-37"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="611" vert-adv-y="611"></glyph.data></g></svg> 2°C.</div>

Journal of Nanomaterials

fig7

Figure 7

Figure 7: Comparison of Adsorption Capability of Activated Carbon and Metal Doped TiO<sub>2</sub> for Geosmin and 2-MIB Removal from Water 

Journal of Nanomaterials

Comparison of Adsorption Capability of Activated Carbon and Metal Doped TiO2 for Geosmin and 2-MIB Removal from Water

Figure 7

Comparison of Adsorption Capability of Activated Carbon and Metal Doped TiO₂ for Geosmin and 2-MIB Removal from Water