Nanomaterials for Medical and Dental ApplicationsView this Special Issue
Research Article | Open Access
Seunghan Oh, Eun-Joo Choi, Munkhsoyol Erkhembaatar, Min Seuk Kim, "UV Photocatalysis of Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages on TiO2 Nanotubes Mediates Intracellular Ca2+ Influx via Voltage-Gated Ca2+ Channels", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2015, Article ID 583456, 7 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/583456
UV Photocatalysis of Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages on TiO2 Nanotubes Mediates Intracellular Ca2+ Influx via Voltage-Gated Ca2+ Channels
Titanium (Ti) possesses excellent properties for use in dental implants but has low osteogenic surface properties that result in limiting rapid osseointegration. The physiological interaction between the surface of the implant material and bone cells, especially osteoclasts, is a crucial factor in determining successful osseointegration. However, the details of such an interaction remain elusive. Here, we demonstrated that nanotopography on the Ti surface is a crucial factor for modulating intracellular signal transduction in bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs). To define this, intracellular Ca2+ and ROS were simultaneously measured in BMMs that were seeded on polished Ti and TiO2 nanotubes. We found that UV photocatalysis of TiO2 immediately elicits intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) increase and intracellular reactive oxygen species concentration ([ROS]i) reduction in cells on TiO2 nanotubes. UV photocatalysis-mediated [Ca2+]i increase is dependent on extracellular and intracellular ROS generation. Furthermore, extracellular Ca2+ influx through voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) is critical for the UV photocatalysis-mediated [Ca2+]i increase, while phospholipase C (PLC) activation is not required. Considering the physiological roles of Ca2+ signaling in BMMs and osteoclastogenesis, nanotopography on the Ti surface should be considered an important factor that can influence successful dental implantation.
Titanium (Ti) and its alloys are well known to be one of primary metallic biomaterials used in dental and orthopedic implants requiring load-bearing capacity and feature excellent chemical resistance and considerable strength. However, due to the strong chemical stability of Ti and Ti alloys resulting in excellent biocompatibility, they have limited chemical and biological responses, which can react directly with bone forming related cells and is required for rapid osseointegration and strong fixation in the patient [1, 2]. Many researchers have sought to develop various surface treatment of Ti implant in order to create an excellent chemical and biological reactivity to the surface of Ti [3–6]. Osseointegration is determined by numerous factors linked to the host (bone remodeling) and to the implant materials (surface properties). The former is mainly regulated by cell-to-cell interactions between osteoblasts, which deposit bone matrix, and osteoclasts, which resorb bone tissue . In particular, modified osteoclastogenesis or activities of mature osteoclasts cause severe bone disorders and result in poor osseointegration . In the latter case, the surface topography of the implant plays a critical role in the clinical success of bone-anchored implants . Surface physicochemical treatments modifying implant surface chemistry and topography are commonly employed to improve osseointegration of the implant [9–11]. Many studies about biochemical surface modification of Ti report enhanced osseointegration of the Ti surface, depending on surface roughness, bioactive coating, and varied mixture methods. Particularly, many researchers have analyzed that micro surface roughness and morphology were related to the bone contact, primary stability, and intermittent load bearing in vitro and in vivo [12–18].
Nanotopography, as well as microstructures, has been of great interest in the implant field due to the high surface-to-volume ratio, excellent bone cell behavior, and osseointegration capabilities [19–21]. In the field of in vitro molecular biology, it was reported that cellular behavior and functionality were affected by the size of topographical environment [22–25]. Titania (TiO2) nanotubes have been widely studied in the fields of photocatalysis/photoelectrolysis [26–30], water purification [31, 32], solar cells [33–37], and biomedical engineering [38–42]. In particular, the surface structure on vertically aligned TiO2 nanotubes had an important effect on improving the in vitro proliferation and mineralization of osteoblasts [43–45], reducing immune response , and upregulating in vivo osseointegration [20, 43]. In this study, we demonstrate that altered UV photocatalytic activity by surface modification of Ti resulted in the transmission of intracellular signals by mobilizing secondary messengers such as Ca2+ and ROS in BMMs.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Cell Culture and Reagents
Primary bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) were cultured in alpha-modified minimum essential medium (α-MEM; Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and M-CSF (30 ng/mL). Soluble recombinant mouse receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-beta ligand (RANKL) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) were purchased from KOMA Biotech (Seoul, Korea). N-Acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC), U73122, nicardipine, Fura-2-acetoxymethyl ester (Fura-2/AM) and 5-(and-6)-chloromethyl-2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate, and acetyl ester (CM-H2DCFDA) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (MO, USA).
2.2. Fabrication of TiO2 Nanotubes
TiO2 nanotubes were prepared by anodization, as described previously . Briefly, a machined Ti sheet was electropolished under perchloric acid (Sigma, MO, USA) solution mixed with butoxy ethylene glycol (Junsei Co., Japan) and methanol (Sigma, MO, USA) at −40°C for 30 min. The nanotubes were formed on an electropolished Ti sheet (Alfa-Aesar; 0.25 mm thick, 99.5%) by using a mixture of 0.5 wt% hydrofluoric acid (EM Science; 48%) and acetic acid (Fisher; 98%, volumetric ratio = 7 : 1) at 15 V for 30 min. A platinum electrode (Alfa-Aesar; 99.9%) served as the cathode. The specimen was rinsed with deionized water, dried at 80°C, and heat treated at 500°C for 2 h to transform the as-anodized amorphous TiO2 nanotubes into the crystalline phase. The specimens (1.27 × 1.27 cm2 area) used for all experiments were sterilized by autoclaving before use. An identically sized flat Ti sample was used as a control after being cleaned with acetone and isopropyl alcohol, dried, and autoclaved.
2.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Machined, polished, and fabricated TiO2 nanotubes were sputter-coated with very thin gold for examination by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The morphology of the TiO2 nanotubes was observed using SEM (XL30, FEI Corporation).
2.4. Simultaneous Measurement of [Ca2+]i and [ROS]i
and levels were determined as previously described by using the Ca2+-sensitive fluorescent dye Fura-2/AM or the ROS-sensitive fluorescent dye CM-H2DCFDA, respectively . Briefly, isolated BMMs were seeded on the designated plate (Ti sheet or cover glass) at approximately 80% confluence (6 × 105 cells/35-mm dish) and cultured in αMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS and M-CSF (30 ng/mL). The following day, cells were loaded with Fura-2/AM and CM-H2DCFDA for 50 min at room temperature. The plate containing cells was placed in a perfusion chamber and then connected to a perfusion system. Cells were briefly washed out with regular HEPES buffer (10 mmol/L HEPES, 140 mmol/L NaCl, 5 mmol/L KCl, 1 mmol/L MgCl2, 1 mmol/L CaCl2, and 10 mmol/L glucose, adjusted to pH 7.4 and 310 mOsm). Each of the indicated compounds was diluted in regular HEPES buffer or Ca2+ free HEPES buffer (10 mmol/L HEPES, 140 mmol/L NaCl, 5 mmol/L KCl, 1 mmol/L MgCl2, 1 mmol/L EGTA, and 10 mmol/L glucose, adjusted to pH 7.4 and 310 mOsm) and perfused for a designated length of time. Under continuous perfusion with regular HEPES buffer (37°C), titanium plates containing BMMs were sequentially exposed to specific wavelengths of light (340, 380, and 488 nm), and emitted fluorescence (510 nm) was captured using a CCD camera. Captured images were digitized and analyzed using MetaFluor software. data were expressed as ratio of fluorescence intensities (), and intensity of ROS () was normalized and expressed as the relative value of initial intensity.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Results were analyzed using Student’s two-tailed t-test and the data are presented as mean ± SEM of the stated number of observations obtained from the indicated number of independent experiments. values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant .
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. UV Exposure of TiO2 Nanotubes Mediates [ROS]i Reduction and [Ca2+]i Increase in BMMs
We previously reported that modification of the Ti surface, such as by fabrication of nanotubes, dictates cellular fate , and aligned TiO2 nanotubes significantly accelerate the growth of osteoblasts . This is a critical factor in determining osseointegration. In the process of bone remodeling, the osteoclast is also responsible for enhancing osseointegration by resorbing bone on the border between the implant and bone tissue, which triggers the deposition of bone matrix . This evidence raised a question as to whether or not topographical modification of Ti can affect the cellular response of osteoclasts.
Free Ca2+ ions act as secondary messengers that mediate diverse cellular responses such as differentiation, motility, and apoptosis . Importantly, our previous report indicates that stimulation of BMMs (the precursors of osteoclasts) with RANKL induces ROS generation, which is essential for differentiation of BMMs in to osteoclasts . Considering that Ti is immediately oxidized upon exposure to air, forming titanium dioxide (TiO2, titania), and TiO2 generates ROS under UV light exposure, characterizing the correlation between intracellular Ca2+ signaling in BMMs and TiO2-originated ROS is crucial for understanding the interaction between osteoclasts and implant materials, especially Ti. This led us to examine how UV photocatalysis of TiO2 nanotubes affects intracellular Ca2+ responses in BMMs.
As shown in Figure 1(a), self-aligned TiO2 nanotubes were synthesized by anodization. The nanotubes were fabricated with an electropolished Ti sheet in order to remove unwanted foreign materials deposited on the Ti sheets and to improve the uniformity of the nanotubes. We subsequently measured and in cells seeded on a cover glass as a pilot experiment and confirmed whether and levels can be measured in the same cell. Cells were then exposed to 340 nm, 380 nm, and 488 nm wavelength lights, in sequence, to measure and levels simultaneously. Each emitted fluorescence signal was collected at 510 nm and presented as described in Section 2. H2O2 treatment of macrophage cells is known to elicit an acute increase . As expected, and increased in response to H2O2 (Figure 1(b)).
Next, BMMs seeded on polished Ti and TiO2 nanotubes were loaded with both fluorescent dyes and and levels were measured simultaneously. Interestingly, cells on polished Ti showed no change in levels and a small reduction was observed in levels, whereas cells on TiO2 nanotubes showed an acute and large increase and significant reduction in response to UV exposure (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). To define whether increase in cells on TiO2 nanotubes results from ROS generation by the Ti surface, UV-mediated increase was measured in the presence of NAC (10 mM). Figures 2(d) and 2(e) clearly show that removal of extracellular and intracellular ROS abolishes increase in cells on TiO2 nanotubes. This suggests that ROS generated from TiO2 nanotubes are responsible for UV-mediated increase in cells grown on TiO2.
3.2. Nicardipine Significantly Attenuates UV Photocatalysis-Mediated [Ca2+]i Increase but Does Not Attenuate [ROS]i Reduction
Considering these results, we next aimed to determine how UV photocatalysis of TiO2 nanotubes elicits a increase in BMMs. We first noted that UV photocatalysis of TiO2 unexpectedly reduces even though UV photocatalysis is known to generate ROS on the surface of TiO2. We also noted that ROS scavenging by NAC abolished UV photocatalysis-mediated increase. Based on these key observations, we assumed that loss of might change membrane potential and activate voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCCs). A previous report indicates that it is possible that UV photocatalysis of TiO2 turns Ti into a semiconductor, allowing electrons-transfer reactions to occur . To confirm this suspicion, we treated cells with nicardipine, an inhibitor of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, and measured UV photocatalysis-mediated increase and reduction. In Figures 3(a)–3(c), UV photocatalysis-mediated increase was significantly attenuated by inhibition of VGCCs. However, nicardipine did not affect . These results support our hypothesis that UV photocatalysis activates VGCCs and elicits a increase and that reduction by UV photocatalysis may be involved in VGCC activation and increase. Our previous study demonstrated that the Cacna1A and Cacna1D subunits, which are constituents of VGCCs, are the most highly expressed subunits. Further studies are necessary to determine how these molecules are involved in the effects observed after UV photocatalysis of TiO2.
3.3. Phospholipase C (PLC) Activity Is Not Involved in UV Photocatalysis-Mediated [Ca2+]i Increase and [ROS]i Reduction
ROS are highly reactive and can nonspecifically activate molecules in the plasma membrane or inside the cell. Diverse extracellular stimuli including hormones, neurotransmitters, and exogenous ROS function through PLC to mobilize Ca2+ from internal Ca2+ stores . To determine whether UV photocatalysis-mediated increase is mediated by PLC activation, cells on TiO2 nanotubes were treated with U73122 to inhibit PLCs. When the cells on TiO2 nanotubes were exposed to UV in the presence of U73122 (10 μM), was not significantly increased compared to that in cells treated with HEPES buffer (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). Moreover, inhibition of PLCs by U73122 did not affect UV photocatalysis-mediated reduction compared to that observed in a control treated with HEPES buffer (Figure 4(c)). These results demonstrate that UV photocatalysis-mediated increase and reduction are not related to PLC activation. Considering previous results that showed that UV photocatalysis of TiO2 mediates reduction and had no effects on PLC activity, we suggest that ROS generated by UV photocatalysis on TiO2 have no permeability.
In summary, our study demonstrates that UV photocatalysis of TiO2 immediately elicits increase and reduction in cells growing on TiO2 nanotubes. UV photocatalysis-mediated increase is dependent on extracellular and intracellular ROS generation. Furthermore, extracellular Ca2+ influx thorough VGCCs is critical for UV photocatalysis-mediated increase, while PLC activation is not. Considering the physiological roles of Ca2+ signaling in BMMs and osteoclastogenesis, nanotopography on the Ti surface should be considered an important factor that can influence successful dental implantation.
Conflict of Interests
The authors state that they have no conflict of interests.
Seunghan Oh and Eun-Joo Choi contributed equally to this work.
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (NRF-2012R1A1A1038381).
- D. Buser, T. Nydegger, T. Oxland et al., “Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 75–83, 1999.
- R. Adell, B. Eriksson, U. Lekholm, P. I. Brånemark, and T. Jemt, “Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws,” The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 347–359, 1990.
- T. Albrektsson, P.-I. Branemark, H.-A. Hansson, and J. Lindstrom, “Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 155–170, 1981.
- X. Y. Liu, P. K. Chu, and C. X. Ding, “Surface modification of titanium, titanium alloys, and related materials for biomedical applications,” Materials Science & Engineering R: Reports, vol. 47, no. 3-4, pp. 49–121, 2004.
- B. D. Boyan, T. W. Hummert, D. D. Dean, and Z. Schwartz, “Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response,” Biomaterials, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 137–146, 1996.
- L. Le Guéhennec, A. Soueidan, P. Layrolle, and Y. Amouriq, “Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration,” Dental Materials, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 844–854, 2007.
- D. Chappard, “Bone modeling and remodeling during osseointegration,” Revue de Stomatologie, de Chirurgie Maxillo-faciale et de Chirurgie Orale, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 159–165, 2013.
- J. Hilborn and L. M. Bjursten, “A new and evolving paradigm for biocompatibility,” Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 110–119, 2007.
- C. Eriksson, J. Lausmaa, and H. Nygren, “Interactions between human whole blood and modified TiO2-surfaces: Influence of surface topography and oxide thickness on leukocyte adhesion and activation,” Biomaterials, vol. 22, no. 14, pp. 1987–1996, 2001.
- C. Larsson, P. Thomsen, B.-O. Aronsson et al., “Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses,” Biomaterials, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 605–616, 1996.
- K. Bordji, J.-Y. Jouzeau, D. Mainard, E. Payan, J.-P. Delagoutte, and P. Netter, “Evaluation of the effect of three surface treatments on the biocompatibility of 316L stainless steel using human differentiated cells,” Biomaterials, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 491–500, 1996.
- S. Imade, R. Mori, Y. Uchio, and S. Furuya, “Effect of implant surface roughness on bone fixation: the differences between bone and metal pegs,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 652–657, 2009.
- A. Tabassum, G. J. Meijer, J. G. C. Wolke, and J. A. Jansen, “Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 327–332, 2009.
- H.-L. Huang, L.-J. Fuh, J.-T. Hsu, M.-G. Tu, Y.-W. Shen, and C.-L. Wu, “Effects of implant surface roughness and stiffness of grafted bone on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a 3D numerical analysis,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 283–290, 2008.
- J. Duyck, E. Slaets, K. Sasaguri, K. Vandamme, and I. Naert, “Effect of intermittent loading and surface roughness on peri-implant bone formation in a bone chamber model,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 998–1006, 2007.
- M. M. Shalabi, J. G. C. Wolke, and J. A. Jansen, “The effects of implant surface roughness and surgical technique on implant fixation in an in vitro model,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 172–178, 2006.
- M. Marchisio, M. di Carmine, R. Pagone, A. Piattelli, and S. Miscia, “Implant surface roughness influences osteoclast proliferation and differentiation,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research—Part B: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 251–256, 2005.
- S. H. Chung, H.-K. Kim, W.-J. Shon, and Y.-S. Park, “Peri-implant bone formations around (Ti,Zr)O2-coated zirconia implants with different surface roughness,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 404–411, 2013.
- M. Bigerelle, K. Anselme, B. Noël, I. Ruderman, P. Hardouin, and A. Iost, “Improvement in the morphology of Ti-based surfaces: A new process to increase in vitro human osteoblast response,” Biomaterials, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1563–1577, 2002.
- C. G. Kang, Y. B. Park, H. Choi et al., “Osseointegration of implants surface treated with various diameters of TiO2 nanotubes in rabbit,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2015, Article ID 634650, 11 pages, 2015.
- G. Mendonça, D. B. S. Mendonça, F. J. L. Aragão, and L. F. Cooper, “Advancing dental implant surface technology—from micron- to nanotopography,” Biomaterials, vol. 29, no. 28, pp. 3822–3835, 2008.
- S.-H. Oh, R. R. Finõnes, C. Daraio, L.-H. Chen, and S. Jin, “Growth of nano-scale hydroxyapatite using chemically treated titanium oxide nanotubes,” Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 24, pp. 4938–4943, 2005.
- A. S. G. Curtis, M. Dolby, and N. Gadegaand, “Cell signaling arising from nanotopography: implications for nanomedical devices,” Nanomedicine, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67–72, 2006.
- J. O. Gallagher, K. F. McGhee, C. D. W. Wilkinson, and M. O. Riehle, “Interaction of animal cells with ordered nanotopography,” IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 24–28, 2002.
- J. Park, S. Bauer, K. von der Mark, and P. Schmuki, “Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate,” Nano Letters, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1686–1691, 2007.
- M. Niraula, S. Adhikari, D. Y. Lee et al., “Titania nanotube-silver phosphate hybrid heterostructure for improved visible light induced photocatalysis,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 593, pp. 193–197, 2014.
- N. Murakami, Y. Fujisawa, T. Tsubota, and T. Ohno, “Development of a visible-light-responsive titania nanotube photocatalyst by site-selective modification with hetero metal ions,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 92, no. 1-2, pp. 56–60, 2009.
- S. B. Abd Hamid, T. L. Tan, C. W. Lai, and E. M. Samsudin, “Multiwalled carbon nanotube/TiO2 nanocomposite as a highly active photocatalyst for photodegradation of Reactive Black 5 dye,” Chinese Journal of Catalysis, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 2014–2019, 2014.
- Ratnawati, J. Gunlazuardi, E. L. Dewi, and Slamet, “Effect of NaBF4 addition on the anodic synthesis of TiO2 nanotube arrays photocatalyst for production of hydrogen from glycerol–water solution,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 39, no. 30, pp. 16927–16935, 2014.
- X. Zhang, Y. Chai, L. Lin, K. Zhang, B. Zhao, and D. He, “An efficient photocatalyst: anodized TiO2 nanotube arrays codoped with Gd-La,” Catalysis Letters, vol. 144, no. 6, pp. 987–994, 2014.
- R. X. Zhou, S. Z. Kang, X. Q. Li, L. Wang, L. X. Qin, and J. Mu, “An efficient photocatalyst used in a continuous flow system for hydrogen evolution from water: TiO2 nanotube arrays fabricated on Ti meshes,” RSC Advances, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 6954–6961, 2015.
- F. X. Fu, Y. Q. Gong, P. D. Sun, and Q. Xu, “Development of Fe2O3-modified TiO2 nanotube array photoelectrode for water purification,” Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, vol. 241, 2011.
- M. Guo, K. Xie, X. Liu, Y. Wang, L. Zhou, and H. Huang, “A strategy to reduce the angular dependence of a dye-sensitized solar cell by coupling to a TiO2 nanotube photonic crystal,” Nanoscale, vol. 6, no. 21, pp. 13060–13067, 2014.
- A. Lamberti, A. Sacco, S. Bianco et al., “Charge transport improvement employing TiO2 nanotube arrays as front-side illuminated dye-sensitized solar cell photoanodes,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 2596–2602, 2013.
- W. Guo, X. Xue, S. Wang, C. Lin, and Z. L. Wang, “An integrated power pack of dye-sensitized solar cell and Li battery based on double-sided TiO2 nanotube arrays,” Nano Letters, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 2520–2523, 2012.
- Z. Lv, J. Yu, H. Wu et al., “Highly efficient and completely flexible fiber-shaped dye-sensitized solar cell based on TiO2 nanotube array,” Nanoscale, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1248–1253, 2012.
- C. T. Yip, H. Huang, L. Zhou et al., “Direct and seamless coupling of TiO2 nanotube photonic crystal to dye-sensitized solar cell: a single-step approach,” Advanced Materials, vol. 23, no. 47, pp. 5624–5628, 2011.
- E. Zalnezhad, A. Hamouda, G. Faraji, and S. Shamshirband, “TiO2 nanotube coating on stainless steel 304 for biomedical applications,” Ceramics International, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 2785–2793, 2015.
- K. F. Huo, B. Gao, J. J. Fu, L. Z. Zhao, and P. K. Chu, “Fabrication, modification, and biomedical applications of anodized TiO2 nanotube arrays,” RSC Advances, vol. 4, no. 33, pp. 17300–17324, 2014.
- Y. K. Lai, L. X. Lin, F. Pan et al., “Bioinspired patterning with extreme wettability contrast on TiO2 nanotube array surface: a versatile platform for biomedical applications,” Small, vol. 9, no. 17, pp. 2945–2953, 2013.
- A. Roguska, M. Pisarek, M. Andrzejczuk, M. Lewandowska, K. J. Kurzydlowski, and M. Janik-Czachor, “Surface characterization of Ca-P/Ag/TiO2 nanotube composite layers on Ti intended for biomedical applications,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research—Part A, vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 1954–1962, 2012.
- A. Roguska, M. Pisarek, M. Andrzejczuk, M. Dolata, M. Lewandowska, and M. Janik-Czachor, “Characterization of a calcium phosphate-TiO2 nanotube composite layer for biomedical applications,” Materials Science and Engineering C: Materials for Biological Applications, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 906–914, 2011.
- Y. Li, W. Xiong, C. Zhang et al., “Enhanced osseointegration and antibacterial action of zinc-loaded titania-nanotube-coated titanium substrates: in vitro and in vivo studies,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 102, no. 11, pp. 3939–3950, 2014.
- S. Minagar, Y. Li, C. C. Berndt, and C. Wen, “The influence of titania-zirconia-zirconium titanate nanotube characteristics on osteoblast cell adhesion,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 12, pp. 281–289, 2015.
- K. Gulati, S. Ramakrishnan, M. S. Aw, G. J. Atkins, D. M. Findlay, and D. Losic, “Biocompatible polymer coating of titania nanotube arrays for improved drug elution and osteoblast adhesion,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 449–456, 2012.
- B. S. Smith, P. Capellato, S. Kelley, M. Gonzalez-Juarrero, and K. C. Popat, “Reduced in vitro immune response on titania nanotube arrays compared to titanium surface,” Biomaterials Science, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 322–332, 2013.
- S. Oh, C. Daraio, L.-H. Chen, T. R. Pisanic, R. R. Fiñones, and S. Jin, “Significantly accelerated osteoblast cell growth on aligned TiO2 nanotubes,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 97–103, 2006.
- M. S. Kim, Y.-M. Yang, A. Son et al., “RANKL-mediated reactive oxygen species pathway that induces long lasting Ca2+ oscillations essential for osteoclastogenesis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 10, pp. 6913–6921, 2010.
- S. Oh, K. S. Brammer, Y. S. J. Li et al., “Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 7, pp. 2130–2135, 2009.
- C. Minkin and V. C. Marinho, “Role of the osteoclast at the bone-implant interface,” Advances in Dental Research, vol. 13, pp. 49–56, 1999.
- M. J. Berridge, P. Lipp, and M. D. Bootman, “The versatility and universality of calcium signalling,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 2000.
- J. Zou, J. F. Ainscough, W. Yang et al., “A differential role of macrophage TRPM2 channels in Ca2+ signaling and cell death in early responses to H2O2,” The American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology, vol. 305, no. 1, pp. C61–C69, 2013.
- N. Sakai, Y. Ebina, K. Takada, and T. Sasaki, “Electronic band structure of titania semiconductor nanosheets revealed by electrochemical and photoelectrochemical studies,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 18, pp. 5851–5858, 2004.
- M. J. Berridge, M. D. Bootman, and H. L. Roderick, “Calcium signalling: aynamics, homeostasis and remodelling,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 517–529, 2003.
Copyright © 2015 Seunghan Oh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.