Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2015, Article ID 583456, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/583456
Research Article

UV Photocatalysis of Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages on TiO2 Nanotubes Mediates Intracellular Ca2+ Influx via Voltage-Gated Ca2+ Channels

1Department of Dental Biomaterials and Institute of Biomaterials-Implant, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Jeonbuk 570-749, Republic of Korea
2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Jeonbuk 570-749, Republic of Korea
3Department of Oral Physiology and Institute of Biomaterial-Implant, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Jeonbuk 570-749, Republic of Korea

Received 1 April 2015; Revised 18 May 2015; Accepted 18 May 2015

Academic Editor: Ramaswamy Narayanan

Copyright © 2015 Seunghan Oh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Buser, T. Nydegger, T. Oxland et al., “Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 75–83, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Adell, B. Eriksson, U. Lekholm, P. I. Brånemark, and T. Jemt, “Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws,” The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 347–359, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. Albrektsson, P.-I. Branemark, H.-A. Hansson, and J. Lindstrom, “Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 155–170, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. X. Y. Liu, P. K. Chu, and C. X. Ding, “Surface modification of titanium, titanium alloys, and related materials for biomedical applications,” Materials Science & Engineering R: Reports, vol. 47, no. 3-4, pp. 49–121, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. D. Boyan, T. W. Hummert, D. D. Dean, and Z. Schwartz, “Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response,” Biomaterials, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 137–146, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Le Guéhennec, A. Soueidan, P. Layrolle, and Y. Amouriq, “Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration,” Dental Materials, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 844–854, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Chappard, “Bone modeling and remodeling during osseointegration,” Revue de Stomatologie, de Chirurgie Maxillo-faciale et de Chirurgie Orale, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 159–165, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Hilborn and L. M. Bjursten, “A new and evolving paradigm for biocompatibility,” Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 110–119, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Eriksson, J. Lausmaa, and H. Nygren, “Interactions between human whole blood and modified TiO2-surfaces: Influence of surface topography and oxide thickness on leukocyte adhesion and activation,” Biomaterials, vol. 22, no. 14, pp. 1987–1996, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Larsson, P. Thomsen, B.-O. Aronsson et al., “Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses,” Biomaterials, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 605–616, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. Bordji, J.-Y. Jouzeau, D. Mainard, E. Payan, J.-P. Delagoutte, and P. Netter, “Evaluation of the effect of three surface treatments on the biocompatibility of 316L stainless steel using human differentiated cells,” Biomaterials, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 491–500, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Imade, R. Mori, Y. Uchio, and S. Furuya, “Effect of implant surface roughness on bone fixation: the differences between bone and metal pegs,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 652–657, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Tabassum, G. J. Meijer, J. G. C. Wolke, and J. A. Jansen, “Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 327–332, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H.-L. Huang, L.-J. Fuh, J.-T. Hsu, M.-G. Tu, Y.-W. Shen, and C.-L. Wu, “Effects of implant surface roughness and stiffness of grafted bone on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a 3D numerical analysis,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 283–290, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Duyck, E. Slaets, K. Sasaguri, K. Vandamme, and I. Naert, “Effect of intermittent loading and surface roughness on peri-implant bone formation in a bone chamber model,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 998–1006, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. M. Shalabi, J. G. C. Wolke, and J. A. Jansen, “The effects of implant surface roughness and surgical technique on implant fixation in an in vitro model,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 172–178, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Marchisio, M. di Carmine, R. Pagone, A. Piattelli, and S. Miscia, “Implant surface roughness influences osteoclast proliferation and differentiation,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research—Part B: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 251–256, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. H. Chung, H.-K. Kim, W.-J. Shon, and Y.-S. Park, “Peri-implant bone formations around (Ti,Zr)O2-coated zirconia implants with different surface roughness,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 404–411, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Bigerelle, K. Anselme, B. Noël, I. Ruderman, P. Hardouin, and A. Iost, “Improvement in the morphology of Ti-based surfaces: A new process to increase in vitro human osteoblast response,” Biomaterials, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1563–1577, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. G. Kang, Y. B. Park, H. Choi et al., “Osseointegration of implants surface treated with various diameters of TiO2 nanotubes in rabbit,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2015, Article ID 634650, 11 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. G. Mendonça, D. B. S. Mendonça, F. J. L. Aragão, and L. F. Cooper, “Advancing dental implant surface technology—from micron- to nanotopography,” Biomaterials, vol. 29, no. 28, pp. 3822–3835, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S.-H. Oh, R. R. Finõnes, C. Daraio, L.-H. Chen, and S. Jin, “Growth of nano-scale hydroxyapatite using chemically treated titanium oxide nanotubes,” Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 24, pp. 4938–4943, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. S. G. Curtis, M. Dolby, and N. Gadegaand, “Cell signaling arising from nanotopography: implications for nanomedical devices,” Nanomedicine, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67–72, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. O. Gallagher, K. F. McGhee, C. D. W. Wilkinson, and M. O. Riehle, “Interaction of animal cells with ordered nanotopography,” IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 24–28, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Park, S. Bauer, K. von der Mark, and P. Schmuki, “Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate,” Nano Letters, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1686–1691, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Niraula, S. Adhikari, D. Y. Lee et al., “Titania nanotube-silver phosphate hybrid heterostructure for improved visible light induced photocatalysis,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 593, pp. 193–197, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. N. Murakami, Y. Fujisawa, T. Tsubota, and T. Ohno, “Development of a visible-light-responsive titania nanotube photocatalyst by site-selective modification with hetero metal ions,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 92, no. 1-2, pp. 56–60, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. B. Abd Hamid, T. L. Tan, C. W. Lai, and E. M. Samsudin, “Multiwalled carbon nanotube/TiO2 nanocomposite as a highly active photocatalyst for photodegradation of Reactive Black 5 dye,” Chinese Journal of Catalysis, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 2014–2019, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. Ratnawati, J. Gunlazuardi, E. L. Dewi, and Slamet, “Effect of NaBF4 addition on the anodic synthesis of TiO2 nanotube arrays photocatalyst for production of hydrogen from glycerol–water solution,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 39, no. 30, pp. 16927–16935, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. X. Zhang, Y. Chai, L. Lin, K. Zhang, B. Zhao, and D. He, “An efficient photocatalyst: anodized TiO2 nanotube arrays codoped with Gd-La,” Catalysis Letters, vol. 144, no. 6, pp. 987–994, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. X. Zhou, S. Z. Kang, X. Q. Li, L. Wang, L. X. Qin, and J. Mu, “An efficient photocatalyst used in a continuous flow system for hydrogen evolution from water: TiO2 nanotube arrays fabricated on Ti meshes,” RSC Advances, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 6954–6961, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. F. X. Fu, Y. Q. Gong, P. D. Sun, and Q. Xu, “Development of Fe2O3-modified TiO2 nanotube array photoelectrode for water purification,” Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, vol. 241, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  33. M. Guo, K. Xie, X. Liu, Y. Wang, L. Zhou, and H. Huang, “A strategy to reduce the angular dependence of a dye-sensitized solar cell by coupling to a TiO2 nanotube photonic crystal,” Nanoscale, vol. 6, no. 21, pp. 13060–13067, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. A. Lamberti, A. Sacco, S. Bianco et al., “Charge transport improvement employing TiO2 nanotube arrays as front-side illuminated dye-sensitized solar cell photoanodes,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 2596–2602, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. W. Guo, X. Xue, S. Wang, C. Lin, and Z. L. Wang, “An integrated power pack of dye-sensitized solar cell and Li battery based on double-sided TiO2 nanotube arrays,” Nano Letters, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 2520–2523, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Z. Lv, J. Yu, H. Wu et al., “Highly efficient and completely flexible fiber-shaped dye-sensitized solar cell based on TiO2 nanotube array,” Nanoscale, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1248–1253, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. T. Yip, H. Huang, L. Zhou et al., “Direct and seamless coupling of TiO2 nanotube photonic crystal to dye-sensitized solar cell: a single-step approach,” Advanced Materials, vol. 23, no. 47, pp. 5624–5628, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. E. Zalnezhad, A. Hamouda, G. Faraji, and S. Shamshirband, “TiO2 nanotube coating on stainless steel 304 for biomedical applications,” Ceramics International, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 2785–2793, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. K. F. Huo, B. Gao, J. J. Fu, L. Z. Zhao, and P. K. Chu, “Fabrication, modification, and biomedical applications of anodized TiO2 nanotube arrays,” RSC Advances, vol. 4, no. 33, pp. 17300–17324, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. Y. K. Lai, L. X. Lin, F. Pan et al., “Bioinspired patterning with extreme wettability contrast on TiO2 nanotube array surface: a versatile platform for biomedical applications,” Small, vol. 9, no. 17, pp. 2945–2953, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. Roguska, M. Pisarek, M. Andrzejczuk, M. Lewandowska, K. J. Kurzydlowski, and M. Janik-Czachor, “Surface characterization of Ca-P/Ag/TiO2 nanotube composite layers on Ti intended for biomedical applications,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research—Part A, vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 1954–1962, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. Roguska, M. Pisarek, M. Andrzejczuk, M. Dolata, M. Lewandowska, and M. Janik-Czachor, “Characterization of a calcium phosphate-TiO2 nanotube composite layer for biomedical applications,” Materials Science and Engineering C: Materials for Biological Applications, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 906–914, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. Y. Li, W. Xiong, C. Zhang et al., “Enhanced osseointegration and antibacterial action of zinc-loaded titania-nanotube-coated titanium substrates: in vitro and in vivo studies,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 102, no. 11, pp. 3939–3950, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. Minagar, Y. Li, C. C. Berndt, and C. Wen, “The influence of titania-zirconia-zirconium titanate nanotube characteristics on osteoblast cell adhesion,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 12, pp. 281–289, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. K. Gulati, S. Ramakrishnan, M. S. Aw, G. J. Atkins, D. M. Findlay, and D. Losic, “Biocompatible polymer coating of titania nanotube arrays for improved drug elution and osteoblast adhesion,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 449–456, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. B. S. Smith, P. Capellato, S. Kelley, M. Gonzalez-Juarrero, and K. C. Popat, “Reduced in vitro immune response on titania nanotube arrays compared to titanium surface,” Biomaterials Science, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 322–332, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Oh, C. Daraio, L.-H. Chen, T. R. Pisanic, R. R. Fiñones, and S. Jin, “Significantly accelerated osteoblast cell growth on aligned TiO2 nanotubes,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 97–103, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. S. Kim, Y.-M. Yang, A. Son et al., “RANKL-mediated reactive oxygen species pathway that induces long lasting Ca2+ oscillations essential for osteoclastogenesis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 10, pp. 6913–6921, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. S. Oh, K. S. Brammer, Y. S. J. Li et al., “Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 7, pp. 2130–2135, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. C. Minkin and V. C. Marinho, “Role of the osteoclast at the bone-implant interface,” Advances in Dental Research, vol. 13, pp. 49–56, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. J. Berridge, P. Lipp, and M. D. Bootman, “The versatility and universality of calcium signalling,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. J. Zou, J. F. Ainscough, W. Yang et al., “A differential role of macrophage TRPM2 channels in Ca2+ signaling and cell death in early responses to H2O2,” The American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology, vol. 305, no. 1, pp. C61–C69, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. N. Sakai, Y. Ebina, K. Takada, and T. Sasaki, “Electronic band structure of titania semiconductor nanosheets revealed by electrochemical and photoelectrochemical studies,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 18, pp. 5851–5858, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. J. Berridge, M. D. Bootman, and H. L. Roderick, “Calcium signalling: aynamics, homeostasis and remodelling,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 517–529, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus