Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Engineered Nanoparticles and Their Applications

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 679474 |

Cheng-Wen Ma, Chia-Ming Chang, Po-Cheng Huang, Yao-Joe Yang, "Sea-Urchin-Like ZnO Nanoparticle Film for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2015, Article ID 679474, 6 pages, 2015.

Sea-Urchin-Like ZnO Nanoparticle Film for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

Academic Editor: Tapan Desai
Received19 May 2015
Accepted14 Jul 2015
Published11 Oct 2015


We present novel sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticles synthesized using a chemical solution method. Solution approaches to synthesizing ZnO nanostructures have several advantages including low growth temperatures and high potential for scaling up. We investigated the influence of reaction times on the thickness and morphology of sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticles, and XRD patterns show strong intensity in every direction. Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) were developed using the synthesized ZnO nanostructures as photoanodes. The DSSCs comprised a fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass with dense ZnO nanostructures as the working electrode, a platinized FTO glass as the counter electrode, N719-based dye, and I-/I3-liquid electrolyte. The DSSC fabricated using such nanostructures yielded a high power conversion efficiency of 1.16% with an incident photo-to-current efficiency (IPCE) as high as 15.32%. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was applied to investigate the characteristics of DSSCs. An improvement in the electron transport in the ZnO photoanode was also observed.

1. Introduction

Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) provide efficient solar-energy conversion and have attracted substantial attention over the past decade because of their structural flexibility, low cost, and ease of fabrication [13]. In general, DSSCs comprise a porous TiO2 nanoparticle photoanode [46]. Researchers in many recent studies have focused on improving performance through developing new substitutes for porous TiO2 nanoparticle films for use in photoanodes, such as the TiO2-nanowire type [7, 8] and TiO2-nanotube type [9, 10]. However, a recombination problem usually occurs in TiO2 nanocrystals because of the lack of a depletion layer on the TiO2 surface. The severity of the recombination problem increases with the TiO2 photoanode film thickness [11].

In recent years, ZnO-based materials have been widely studied for use as photoanodes for DSSC devices [12]. Although ZnO has a similar energy level of the conduction band as that of TiO2, the ZnO-based DSSCs in general give lower efficiency as compared to TiO2-based DSSCs. One of the reasons is caused by the precipitation of the sensitizing dye with Zn cations for the ZnO-based DSSCs. However, it is relatively difficult to grow TiO2 films on a substrate with controlled structure, which in turn limits the development of TiO2-based DSSCs. Furthermore, in terms of material characteristics, ZnO has a few advantages over TiO2, such as higher electronic mobility and more flexibility in high-area film morphologies. Therefore, ZnO is considered as one of the promising alternatives for TiO2 as the core material of DSSCs.

Numerous types of ZnO nanostructures have been proposed for application in DSSCs. For example, Law et al. [13] proposed a DSSC including a dense array of oriented ZnO nanowires as a photoanode material with a 1.51% conversion efficiency. In [14], ZnO nanotube photoanodes templated using anodic aluminum oxide for use in DSSCs were reported. Anodic aluminum oxide templating and atomic layer deposition were employed to yield oriented arrays of electrically interconnected nanotubes. In addition, in [15], ZnO nanoforest photoanodes, which effectively increased the power conversion efficiency to approximately 2.63%, were introduced. The efficiency increase is due to the substantially enhanced surface area and reduced charge recombination. Kakiuchi et al. [16] proposed a DSSC with a ZnO nanosheet structure synthesized using Zn (NO3)2 and (NH2)2CO, achieving a conversion efficiency of 3.3%. In [17], ZnO nanoarchitecture fabricated on a plastic substrate by using a facile room-temperature chemical-bath deposition method was presented. A notable efficiency of 5.24% was simply achieved using a low crystallization temperature and the anisotropic growth of ZnO. In addition, the synthesis of a DSSC with a sponge-like ZnO nanostructure was reported in [18]. By using a polymer gel electrolyte to stabilize the dye/ZnO/electrolyte interface, an improvement of the electron injection efficiency, photovoltaic conversion efficiencies, and the long-term durability of ZnO-based DSSCs was achieved.

In this work, we propose a DSSC in which the photoanode is based on sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticles that can be easily formed through chemical solution synthesis. We also studied the effects of nanoparticle morphologies on different synthesis parameters. In addition, the sea-urchin-like structures may potentially enhance the surface area to improve dye absorbance. Because of the branched characteristic of the sea-urchin-like structures, they can easily form strong conductive networks.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the synthesis, photoanode preparation, and DSSC fabrication. The measurement results are presented in Section 3. Conclusions are provided in Section 4.

2. Synthesis of Nanoparticles

Figure 1 shows a schematic of the proposed DSSC. From the lower to the upper layer, the cell comprises a fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) transparent conductive glass with a ZnO photoanode and platinized counter electrode. Organic dye molecules are absorbed on the photoanode, with the electrolyte positioned between the electrodes. This study proposes using novel sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticles as a photoanode material according to the following fabrication process.

The chemical solution method [19] was used to synthesize the sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticle structure. First, a room-temperature solution was prepared. The solution was composed of 75 mM zinc nitrate hexahydrate, 25 mM HMTA, 5 mM PEI, and 0.80 M ammonium hydroxide. The reaction solution was heated in two steps [20]. In a container, the solution was first heated to 85°C in a water bath while covered by a watch glass. After 15 min, the glass was removed, exposing the solution to open air for another 15 min. The nondirectional ZnO nanostructures (sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticles) formed on the bottom of the container. Next, the container was covered with the watch glass to prevent further solution evaporation. The deposited ZnO structure continued to grow. Finally, the sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticles were deposited on the top of the FTO electrode.

After the synthesis reaction, the FTO covered with a sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticle film (the photoanode) was dried in N2 for a few minutes and then heated in a tube furnace at 400°C for 30 min. The heating process enhanced the mechanical strength of the ZnO film and the adhesion between the film and the FTO substrate.

The FTO substrate with the sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticles (the fabricated photoanode) was immersed in an ethanol solution of N719 dye at 50°C for 2 h. After fully absorbing the dye molecules, the FTO substrate was washed with ethanol and then air dried. A FTO glass deposited with a platinum film served as the counter electrode. The photoanode and counter electrode were then sandwiched using Surlyn E185SB (Dupont). A liquid electrolyte was then injected into the cavity of the photoanode and counter electrode. The electrolyte contains 0.5 M LiI, 50 mM I2, and 0.5 M 4-tert-butylpyridine in a 3-methoxypropionitrile solvent [13].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphology and Structure Characterization

Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show the SEM images of the sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticles with various deposition times. Figure 2(c) illustrates the detailed structural morphologies, indicating that the longer the deposition time, the longer the branch length of the ZnO nanoparticles because of the increased reaction time, and the sea-urchin-like structure becomes more obvious. As the length of the sea-urchin-like structure increases, the effective total surface area of the photoanode also increases, thus enhancing dye absorbance.

Figure 3 depicts the measured relationship of the thickness of the structure versus the synthesis time. A longer deposition time resulted in a thicker nanostructure. The thickness of the synthesized structure increased from 0 to about 25 μm within 12 h. During the early stage of the synthesis process (synthesis time is less than 4 hours), the ZnO particles are relatively small and the branches on each ZnO particle are relatively thin and short. These particles closely pile up to form a ZnO film. However, as the synthesis time is larger than 4 hours, the ZnO particles become larger and the branches of each ZnO particle become thicker and longer (i.e., stronger). These bigger ZnO particles are relatively difficult to be closely packed and stacked. As a result, these bigger particles with stronger branches uphold the film structure, and the density of the film becomes smaller, as compared with the film formed by smaller particles. Therefore, the film thickness increases faster as the synthesis time is larger than 4 hours. As shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b), the ZnO film of 4-hour synthesis is more packed than the ZnO film of 8-hour synthesis.

The specific surface area and average internal pore morphology of the sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticle film were obtained by analyzing nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherms (Figure 4). According to the results, the sea-urchin-like ZnO film can be categorized as a general Type III isotherm that exhibits no hysteresis. The isotherms indicated that nitrogen adsorption and desorption occur predominantly at . Figure 5 shows the results of the pore size analysis conducted using the Barrett, Joyner, and Halenda (BJH) method. The specific surface area was calculated using the standard Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis of the adsorption isotherms and was estimated at about 11.09 m2/g. The surface area-to-volume ratio from this analysis implied an average pore diameter of about 198.8 Å.

The crystal orientation of the sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticles structure was characterized using X-ray diffraction (Rigaku TTRAX 3) (Figure 6). The diffraction peaks can be indexed as a hexagonal wurtzite ZnO phase in contrast to JCPDS Card number 75-1526 [21]. Compared with the XRD patterns of typical ZnO nanowires, the Z-direction (002) intensity of the sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticles was relatively flat, indicating that the orientations of the ZnO crystal structures in the sea-urchin-like structure are quite random.

3.2. Photocurrent-Voltage and Power Conversion Characteristics

Current-voltage (I-V) curve measurements were conducted using a source meter (Keithley 2410). Simulated AM 1.5 G (100 mW/cm2) illumination was provided by a solar light source (Newport class A), and the light intensity was measured using a calibrated Si solar cell. The total measurement area of the photoanode was 0.25 cm2, and the voltage swept from −1 to 1 V in fixed increments of 0.02 V.

Figure 7 illustrates the I-V characteristics of the sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticles with dissimilar deposition times. The longer the deposition time was, the higher the photocurrent was. Notably, at a deposition time of 16 h, the photocurrent became extremely low, possibly because overdeposited nanoparticles caused the electron transport pathway to become excessively long, thus substantially reducing the power conversion efficiency. The maximum conversion efficiency was approximately 1.16%. The corresponding photovoltaic parameters are summarized in Table 1.

(mA/cm2) (V)FF (%)

2 hrs3.370.4553.850.81
4 hrs4.010.4958.001.14
8 hrs4.700.5950.191.16
16 hrs1.240.3370.870.29

Incident photo-to-current efficiency (IPCE) spectrum measurements were also conducted using a 300 W xenon lamp and a grating monochromator. In the measurement, the wavelength ranged from 400 to 800 nm with a spectral resolution of 20 nm. The samples fabricated at various deposition times were measured. Figure 8 depicts the results of the IPCE characteristics for different sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticles. The results are similar to the adsorption spectrum of N719 dye [22]. In the current study, the highest IPCE value was 15.32%.

The impedance and phase were measured under an illumination of 100 mW/cm2. The AC signal parameter was 10 mV, and the scanning range was from 105 to 0.05 Hz. The measured samples were the same as those used in the IPCE measurement. Figure 9 shows the Nyquist plot of two sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticles fabricated using different deposition times. Table 2 lists the derived circuit parameters after the data were fitted using a proper equivalent circuit model [23]. The results indicated that a thicker photoanode resulted in a higher electron transport resistance () and a higher charge transfer resistance of the charge recombination process . The lifetime () of injected electrons in the ZnO nanoparticles is defined as . According to the EIS model, the frequency can be extracted using the position of the medium-frequency peak shown in Figure 6, where is the medium-frequency peak [24]. This figure also shows that thicker photoanodes provide a longer electron lifetime.

Cell (s−1) (ms) (Ω) (Ω) (μF) (cm2/s) (μm)

2 hrs1.281242247608.355.41.186 × 10−438.4
8 hrs3.1750.12736105918.32.06 × 10−432.1

4. Conclusion

In this study, we developed novel photoanode material architecture based on sea-urchin-like ZnO nanoparticles and integrated it into a DSSC system. Nanoparticles were synthesized using a simple chemical solution method. The effect of the reaction parameters on the ZnO nanostructure morphology was also studied. BET analysis of the adsorption isotherms was employed to estimate the specific surface area at approximately 11.09 m2/g. In addition, the XRD patterns of the ZnO film showed strong intensity in every direction, indicating that the orientations of the ZnO nanostructures are randomly distributed. The sample synthesized using a deposition time of 8 h exhibited a high power conversion efficiency of approximately 1.16% and an IPCE efficiency of approximately 15.32%. The characteristics of DSSCs measured using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy are also presented.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work was supported in part by the National Science Council, Taiwan (Contract no. NSC 100-2221-E-002-074-MY3).


  1. M. Grätzel, “Photoelectrochemical cells,” Nature, vol. 414, no. 6861, pp. 338–344, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Gubbala, V. Chakrapani, V. Kumar, and M. K. Sunkara, “Band-edge engineered hybrid structures for dye-sensitized solar cells based on SnO2 nanowires,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 2411–2418, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. G. K. Mor, K. Shankar, M. Paulose, O. K. Varghese, and C. A. Grimes, “Use of highly-ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nano Letters, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 215–218, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. B. O'Regan and M. Grätzel, “A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films,” Nature, vol. 353, no. 6346, pp. 737–740, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y. G. Seo, K. Woo, J. Kim, H. Lee, and W. Lee, “Rapid fabrication of an inverse opal TiO2 photoelectrode for DSSC using a binary mixture of TiO2 nanoparticles and polymer microspheres,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 21, no. 16, pp. 3094–3103, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. E. S. Kwak, W. Lee, N.-C. Park, J. Kim, and H. Lee, “Compact inverse-opal electrode using non-aggregated TiO2 nanoparticles for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1093–1099, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. B. Liu and E. S. Aydil, “Growth of oriented single-crystalline rutile TiO2 nanorods on transparent conducting substrates for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 131, no. 11, pp. 3985–3990, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. X. Feng, K. Shankar, O. K. Varghese, M. Paulose, T. J. Latempa, and C. A. Grimes, “Vertically aligned single crystal TiO2 nanowire arrays grown directly on transparent conducting oxide coated glass: synthesis details and applications,” Nano Letters, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 3781–3786, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. G. Yang, C. Miao, Z. Bu, Q. Wang, and W. Guo, “Seed free and low temperature growth of ZnO nanowires in mesoporous TiO2 film for dye-sensitized solar cells with enhanced photovoltaic performance,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 233, pp. 74–78, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Zhu, T. B. Vinzant, N. R. Neale, and A. J. Frank, “Removing structural disorder from oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays: reducing the dimensionality of transport and recombination in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nano Letters, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 3739–3746, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Q. Zhang, C. S. Dandeneau, X. Zhou, and C. Cao, “ZnO nanostructures for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Advanced Materials, vol. 21, no. 41, pp. 4087–4108, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C.-X. He, B.-X. Lei, Y.-F. Wang, C.-Y. Su, Y.-P. Fang, and D.-B. Kuang, “Sonochemical preparation of hierarchical ZnO hollow spheres for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells,” Chemistry—A European Journal, vol. 16, no. 29, pp. 8757–8761, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Law, L. E. Greene, J. C. Johnson, R. Saykally, and P. Yang, “Nanowire dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nature Materials, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 455–459, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. B. F. Martinson, J. W. Elam, J. T. Hupp, and M. J. Pellin, “ZnO nanotube based dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nano Letters, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 2183–2187, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. H. Ko, D. Lee, H. W. Kang et al., “Nanoforest of hydrothermally grown hierarchical ZnO nanowires for a high efficiency dye-sensitized solar cell,” Nano Letters, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 666–671, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. K. Kakiuchi, M. Saito, and S. Fujihara, “Fabrication of ZnO films consisting of densely accumulated mesoporous nanosheets and their dye-sensitized solar cell performance,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 516, no. 8, pp. 2026–2030, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. G.-J. Chang, S.-Y. Lin, and J.-J. Wu, “Room-temperature chemical integration of ZnO nanoarchitectures on plastic substrates for flexible dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nanoscale, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1329–1334, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y. Shi, K. Wang, Y. Du et al., “Solid-state synthesis of ZnO nanostructures for quasi-solid dye-sensitized solar cells with high efficiencies up to 6.46%,” Advanced Materials, vol. 25, no. 32, pp. 4413–4419, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. L. Vayssieres, K. Keis, S.-E. Lindquist, and A. Hagfeldt, “Purpose-built anisotropic metal oxide material: 3d highly oriented microrod array of ZnO,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 105, no. 17, pp. 3350–3352, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. L. Wang, D. Tsan, B. Stoeber, and K. Walus, “Substrate-free fabrication of self-supporting ZnO nanowire arrays,” Advanced Materials, vol. 24, no. 29, pp. 3999–4004, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. Yang, H. Yan, S. Mao et al., “Controlled growth of ZnO nanowires and their optical properties,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 323–331, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  22. M. K. Nazeeruddin, R. Humphry-Baker, P. Liska, and M. Grätzel, “Investigation of sensitizer adsorption and the influence of protons on current and voltage of a dye-sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2 solar cell,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 107, no. 34, pp. 8981–8987, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Adachi, M. Sakamoto, J. Jiu, Y. Ogata, and S. Isoda, “Determination of parameters of electron transport in dye-sensitized solar cells using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 28, pp. 13872–13880, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. R. Kern, R. Sastrawan, J. Ferber, R. Stangl, and J. Luther, “Modeling and interpretation of electrical impedance spectra of dye solar cells operated under open-circuit conditions,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 47, no. 26, pp. 4213–4225, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Cheng-Wen Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.