Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Semiconductor Nanomaterials for Energy Conversion and Storage

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 717016 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/717016

A Facile Low-Temperature Hydrothermal Method to Prepare Anatase Titania/Cellulose Aerogels with Strong Photocatalytic Activities for Rhodamine B and Methyl Orange Degradations

Academic Editor: Chuanfei Guo
Received12 Aug 2014
Revised08 Oct 2014
Accepted08 Oct 2014
Published04 May 2015

Abstract

A facile low-temperature hydrothermal method for in situ preparation of anatase titania (TiO2) homogeneously dispersed in cellulose aerogels substrates was described. The formed anatase TiO2 aggregations composed of a mass of evenly dispersed TiO2 nanoparticles with sizes of 2−5 nm were embedded in the interconnected three-dimensional (3D) architecture of the cellulose aerogels matrixes without large-scale reunion phenomenon; meanwhile, the obtained anatase titania/cellulose (ATC) aerogels also had a high loading amount of TiO2 (ca. 35.7%). Furthermore, compared with commercially available Degussa P25, ATC aerogels displayed comparable photocatalytic activities for Rhodamine B and methyl orange degradations under UV radiation, which might be useful in the fields of catalysts, wastewater treatment, and organic pollutant degradation. Meanwhile, the photocatalytic reaction behaviors of ATC aerogels under UV irradiation were also illuminated.

1. Introduction

Titanium dioxide (TiO2), one of the most important semiconductor materials, has been extensively applied as photocatalyst for decontamination of water polluted with organic pollutants due to its high optical reactivity, chemical and physical inertness, nontoxicity, and low cost [13]. TiO2 crystals mainly exist in two stable polymorphic forms: anatase (tetragonal, space group I41/amd) and rutile (tetragonal, space group P42/mnm) [4]. Generally, it is accepted that anatase TiO2 is more efficient as photocatalyst, and rutile TiO2 is preferable for blocking UV irradiation, notwithstanding that some catalysts with mixed phases exhibit significantly higher catalytic activities like Degussa P25 [5, 6].

In fact, nanoscale particles with large specific surface area and high surface energy are very easy to reunite leading to conspicuous performance degradation. The confinement of nanoparticles can be achieved by using some special matrixes with unique structures as hosts like multiwalled carbon nanotubes [79], graphene [10], fibers [11], and some traditional inorganic or synthetic polymer-based aerogels [12, 13], which could provide a means of particle dispersion and act as protection of metallic nanoparticles against air oxidation. In particular, owing to large specific surface area, high porosity, multiscale micronanostructure, stable chemical property, renewability, and biodegradability, cellulose aerogels are widely considered as good supports for nanomaterials, such as TiO2, ZnO, Ag, and ZrO2 [1417]. In particular, TiO2/cellulose aerogels hybrids are useful for photocatalysts, UV shields, antibacterial materials, and synthesis of transition-metal carbide materials [1821]. Furthermore, synthesis of anatase TiO2/cellulose (ATC) composites generally depends on high-temperature calcination treatment using cellulose or cellulose derivatives as templates at 400−700°C [2224], so as to get anatase TiO2 crystals and avoid excessive crystal transformation from anatase to rutile while exceeding the critical temperature.

Herein, a facile low-temperature hydrothermal method was employed to prepare ATC aerogels instead of the common calcination process. Moreover, distinguishing from some previous literatures about TiO2/cellulose composites with improved activity, in this study, a green NaOH/polyethylene glycol (PEG) aqueous solution was used to fabricate the cellulose aerogels, and the resulting environmentally friendly nanoporous aerogels were selected as hosts to support the nano-TiO2. The obtained ATC aerogels were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and thermogravimetry (TG). Meanwhile, the photocatalytic activities of ATC aerogels for two typical organic pollutants including Rhodamine B (RhB) and methyl orange (MO) degradations were also investigated and compared with those of P25. Based on which, the photocatalytic reaction behaviors of ATC aerogels under UV irradiation were illuminated.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

Sixty-mesh powder of wheat straw after grinding and sieving was collected and dried in a vacuum at 60°C for 24 h before being used. All chemicals were supplied by Tianjin Kemiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., and used as received.

2.2. Cellulose Hydrogel Preparation

A mild effective chemical pretreatment process was employed to extract and purify cellulose from the wheat straw powder, which could refer to our previous report [25]. The obtained dried cellulose was mixed with an aqueous solution of NaOH/PEG-4000 (9 : 1 by weight) with magnetic stirring at room temperature for about 6 h to form a 2 wt% homogenous cellulose solution. Then, the cellulose solution underwent a freeze-thaw process by freezing the solution at −15°C for 12 h and subsequently thawing it out at room temperature for 0.5 h under vigorous stirring. After being frozen again for 3 h at −15°C, the solution was regenerated by placing it into a coagulation bath of 1 v% hydrochloric acid for 6 h, repeating this process until the formation of the amber-like hydrogel. Afterwards, the obtained hydrogel was rinsed repeatedly with distilled water and anhydrous ethyl alcohol (EtOH) to remove superfluous hydrogen ions and chlorine anions.

2.3. ATC Aerogel Preparation

The low-temperature hydrothermal preparation of ATC aerogel was described in Scheme 1. Tetrabutyl orthotita (TBOT) (5 mL) and EtOH (200 mL) were mixed with magnetic stirring for 30 min and then transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave. The cellulose hydrogel was subsequently placed into the above reaction solution. After the autoclave was sealed and heated to 110°C for 4 h, 100 mL deionized water (pH = 6.5) was added, and the solution was reheated to 70°C for 4 h. After reaction, the prepared sample was removed from the solution and ultrasonically rinsed with deionized water and tert-butyl alcohol in sequence for 30 min. Finally, the sample was subjected to a freeze-drying process at −35°C for 48 h, and the following ATC aerogel was successfully fabricated. Moreover, the pure TiO2 particles powders were prepared following the above hydrothermal process without adding the cellulose hydrogel, and the mixed solution after reaction was filtered, washed by distilled water, and dried at 60°C for 24 h to get dried TiO2 particles powders. The pure cellulose aerogel was obtained by the direct tert-butyl alcohol freeze-drying process of the cellulose hydrogel.

2.4. Characterizations

Microstructures and surface chemical compositions were evaluated by SEM (FEI, Quanta 200) equipped with EDX spectrometer operating at 15−20 kV on gold-sputtered samples. TEM observation was carried out on a FEI, Tecnai G2 F20 TEM. Crystalline structures were identified by XRD instrument (Rigaku, D/MAX 2200) operating with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Ǻ) at a scan rate (2θ) of 4°·min−1, accelerating voltage of 40 kV, and applied current of 30 mA ranging from 10° to 80°. XPS spectra were recorded using a Thermo Escalab 250Xi XPS spectrometer (Germany). Deconvolution of the overlapping peaks was performed using a mixed Gaussian-Lorentzian fit program. Thermal stabilities were determined using a TG analyzer (TA Q600) with a heating rate of 10°C·min−1 in a N2 environment.

2.5. Photocatalytic Activities Measurements

The photocatalytic activities of ATC aerogels were evaluated by measuring the decomposition of RhB and MO, while pure TiO2 nanoparticles (commercial Degussa P25) were used for comparison, and the amount of P25 and the amount of ATC aerogels were controlled by the same titania loading determined by the following TG tests. A 100 W mercury lamp with main wavelength of 365 nm was purchased from Beijing BrightStars Science and Technology Corp. and selected as UV light source. For typical photocatalytic experiments of the hybrid aerogels, ATC aerogels samples with sizes of about 20 mm (diameter) × 10 mm (height) were immersed into the circular disks with 30 mL RhB or MO aqueous solutions (50 mg·L−1), respectively. Before irradiation, the solutions with ATC aerogels were magnetically stirred in the dark for 30 min to achieve adsorption equilibrium. Then, the dishes were exposed to the mercury lamp for about 1 h, and the distances between the lamps and the dishes were approximately 10 cm. Samples were taken at every time interval (20 min) and centrifuged for removing photocatalysts. Concentration of the filtrate was analyzed by a TU-1901 UV-vis spectrophotometer (Beijing Purkinje, China) at 554 nm for RhB or 464 nm for MO. The efficiency was calculated by where and are the initial dye concentration and the concentration at time , respectively. Similarly, the photocatalytic experiments of P25 for RhB and MO were following the above procedures.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1(a) showed the SEM image of ATC aerogels. As shown, porous and interconnected three-dimensional (3D) architecture with pore sizes of a few hundred nanometers to several micrometers, originated from the original cellulose hydrogels architecture, could be clearly identified. In addition, it was observed that numerous white ellipsoidal substances surrounding the porous skeleton structure were generated, which might be derived from titanium compounds. To further investigate the chemical components of the newly generated white ellipsoidal substances, the area in the green box with some evident aggregations of particles (Figure 1(a)) was tested by EDX, and the results demonstrated that apart from C and O elements from the cellulose substrates as well as Au element from the coating layer used for SEM observation, new strong peaks corresponding to Ti element were detected (inset in Figure 1(a)), confirming that the white ellipsoidal substances primarily consisted of titanium compounds. Moreover, from the higher magnification SEM image (Figure 1(b)), it was clear that the ellipsoidal substances containing Ti element tightly adhered to the cellulose matrixes, indicating potential good interface bonding.

In order to further explore the composition and structure of the ellipsoidal substances as well as the interaction between the ellipsoidal substances and the cellulose aerogels matrixes, the samples were observed by TEM. The TEM images of different magnifications of ATC aerogels were represented in Figure 2. Apparently, the cellulose aerogels matrixes were loaded with a mass of evenly dispersed nanoparticles as indicated by the dark spots in the TEM image with lower magnification (Figure 2(a)). These abundant particles might be responsible for the formation of the ellipsoidal substances. The higher magnification TEM image (Figure 2(b)) showed that the size of nanoparticles was found to range between 2 and 5 nm and no large-scale aggregation was observed, indicating that the combination of nanoparticles and cellulose aerogels effectively hindered the reunion phenomenon.

XPS measurements were performed to elucidate the surface chemical composition and the oxidation state of ATC aerogels. In the high-resolution XPS spectra of Ti 2p (Figure 3(a)), the binding energies of Ti 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 were centered at 457.2 and 462.5 eV, respectively, which revealed that the titanium elements were in the oxidation state IV, corresponding to Ti4+ (TiO2) [26, 27]. Meanwhile, the result also suggested that the ellipsoidal substances observed by SEM were composed of TiO2 particles; besides, the nanoparticles in the TEM images might be exactly the generated TiO2 particles. The O 1s spectra of ATC aerogels displayed the contributions of three components (Figure 3(b)) including TiO2 (529.8 eV), adsorbed water (531.2 eV), and hydroxyl groups (O–H) (532.1 eV) [28]. Moreover, in the C 1s spectra (Figure 3(c)), major peak at 284.7 eV was related to C−C, C=C, and C−H bonds and the peak at around 287.7 eV suggested the presence of Ti−O−C bond [29].

The XRD patterns of the TiO2 particles and ATC aerogels were shown in Figure 3(d). For the TiO2 particles, a series of characteristic peaks, corresponding to the (103), (004), (112), (200), (105), (211), (213), (204), (116), (220), (107), (215), and (301) planes, were observed, which were regarded as an attributive indicator of anatase phase TiO2 crystallites (JCPDS file number 21-1272) [30]. Similarly, ATC aerogels also exhibited typical strong peaks assigned to anatase phase as well as cellulose characteristic peaks at 11.9°, 19.8°, and 22.0° belonging to (101), (10), and (002) planes [31]. In particular, no peaks of rutile TiO2 phase (JCPDS file number 21-1276) were detected, indicating the high anatase phase purity of ATC aerogels. Meanwhile, the result also revealed that the anatase TiO2 was successfully fabricated and combined with cellulose aerogels by the facile low-temperature hydrothermal method. Moreover, it was obvious that the characteristic peaks of the anatase TiO2 were broad, which was an indication of the small size of the TiO2 particles formed in the ATC aerogels. The crystallite size as calculated by the Debye-Scherrer equation [32] was 4.3 nm, which was consistent with the TEM results from Figure 2(b).

Figure 4 showed the TG and DTG curves of ATC aerogels and the pure cellulose aerogels, respectively. The DTG curve for pure cellulose aerogels showed one major exothermic peak at around 362°C, which represented a typical thermal decomposition behavior of cellulose in an inert atmosphere, as previously reported [33]. In comparison, the maximum loss of weight of ATC aerogels shifted to a temperature of ~323°C, 39°C lower than that of the pure cellulose aerogels according to the DTG curves. The potential reasons for the shift might be the catalytic character of TiO2 [34, 35], and the loosening of molecular chains in crystalline regions of cellulose as the result of infusion of  TiO2 particles [36]. Moreover, ATC aerogels had high residual ash (ca. 44.1%), far higher than that of the pure cellulose aerogels samples (ca. 8.4%), which indicated high loading amount of TiO2 in the hybrid ATC aerogels samples (ca. 35.7%).

RhB and MO, the two kinds of common organic pollutants, were employed to evaluate the photocatalytic activities of ATC aerogels. For the sake of comprehending the photocatalytic property, the commercially available TiO2 P25 (Degussa, Germany) was used as a photocatalytic reference. As shown in Figure 5(a), the concentrations of the RhB and the MO solutions changed a little for the wheat straw, indicating an inferior photocatalytic performance under UV irradiation. On the contrary, both of P25 and ATC aerogels showed strong photodegradation abilities for RhB and MO due to the drastic changes of concentration before and after the experiments. Compared with P25, ATC aerogels exhibited similar concentration change tendency for RhB and slightly faster rate of photocatalytic degradation for MO, respectively, which proved that the photocatalytic activities of ATC aerogels were comparable with those of P25 only taking account of these two kinds of organic pollutants. Moreover, the strong photocatalytic activities of ATC aerogels might be due to good dispersion, potential higher surface area, and smaller crystallite size of the formed anatase TiO2 [37, 38]. Furthermore, Figure 5(b) showed the macrographs of RhB and MO degradations by ATC aerogels, and the significant color differences before and after the UV radiation further indicated the superior photocatalytic activities of ATC aerogels.

Based on the results mentioned above, photocatalytic reaction behaviors of ATC aerogels under UV irradiation for RhB and MO degradations were illuminated in Figure 6. When the surface of ATC aerogels was illuminated by UV light with energy equal to or larger than the band gap energy of anatase TiO2 nanocrystals, the electrons were excited in the valance band (VB) to the conduction band (CB), leading to the formation of a positive hole (h+) in the VB and an electron (e) in the CB [3941]. The generated electron-hole pairs immediately interacted with surface adsorbed molecular oxygen to yield superoxide radical anions () and with water to produce the highly reactive HO radicals, respectively. These radicals groups repeatedly attacked RhB and MO molecules, eventually resulting in their degradations into CO2 and H2O [42, 43], which were responsible for the photocatalytic activity.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, ATC aerogels were successfully fabricated via a mild simple low-temperature hydrothermal method. The as-prepared ATC aerogels were composed of cross-linked 3D architecture originated from the original cellulose hydrogels, and the 3D architecture was surrounded by plentiful ellipsoidal aggregations formed by a mass of evenly dispersed anatase TiO2 nanoparticles with sizes of 2−5 nm. Meanwhile, a high loading amount of TiO2 in the hybrid ATC aerogels samples (ca. 35.7%) was also obtained according to the TG results. Moreover, the ATC aerogels exhibited comparable photocatalytic activities for RhB and MO degradations with Degussa P25 under UV radiation, which might be served as novel green catalysts for water decontamination and organic pollutants decomposition.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the financial support of the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M540263), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 31270590), and the Doctoral Candidate Innovation Research Support Program of Science & Technology Review (kjdb2012006).

References

  1. X. Chen and S. S. Mao, “Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications and applications,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 2891–2959, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Gelover, P. Mondragón, and A. Jiménez, “Titanium dioxide sol-gel deposited over glass and its application as a photocatalyst for water decontamination,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 165, no. 1–3, pp. 241–246, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. L. Pozzo, M. A. Baltanás, and A. E. Cassano, “Supported titanium oxide as photocatalyst in water decontamination: state of the art,” Catalysis Today, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 219–231, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Q. Sun, Y. Lu, H. Zhang et al., “Hydrothermal fabrication of rutile TiO2 submicrospheres on wood surface: an efficient method to prepare UV-protective wood,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 253–258, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Sun, L. Gao, and Q. Zhang, “Synthesizing and comparing the photocatalytic properties of high surface area rutile and anatase titania nanoparticles,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 86, no. 10, pp. 1677–1682, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. D. C. Hurum, A. G. Agrios, K. A. Gray, T. Rajh, and M. C. Thurnauer, “Explaining the enhanced photocatalytic activity of Degussa P25 mixed-phase TiO2 using EPR,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 107, no. 19, pp. 4545–4549, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. X.-H. Xia, Z.-J. Jia, Y. Yu, Y. Liang, Z. Wang, and L.-L. Ma, “Preparation of multi-walled carbon nanotube supported TiO2 and its photocatalytic activity in the reduction of CO2 with H2O,” Carbon, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 717–721, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Y. Yu, J. C. Yu, C.-Y. Chan et al., “Enhancement of adsorption and photocatalytic activity of TiO2 by using carbon nanotubes for the treatment of azo dye,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 61, no. 1-2, pp. 1–11, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Y. Yu, J. C. Yu, J.-G. Yu et al., “Enhancement of photocatalytic activity of mesoporous TiO2 by using carbon nanotubes,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 289, no. 2, pp. 186–196, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Z.-S. Wu, W. Ren, L. Wen et al., “Graphene anchored with Co3O4 nanoparticles as anode of lithium ion batteries with enhanced reversible capacity and cyclic performance,” ACS Nano, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 3187–3194, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. X. Zheng, D. Guo, Y. Shao et al., “Photochemical modification of an optical fiber tip with a silver nanoparticle film: a SERS chemical sensor,” Langmuir, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 4394–4398, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. M. Miller, B. Dunn, T. D. Tran, and R. W. Pekala, “Deposition of ruthenium nanoparticles on carbon aerogels for high energy density supercapacitor electrodes,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 144, no. 12, pp. L309–L311, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. D. Saquing, D. Kang, M. Aindow, and C. Erkey, “Investigation of the supercritical deposition of platinum nanoparticles into carbon aerogels,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 11–23, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Cai, S. Kimura, M. Wada, and S. Kuga, “Nanoporous cellulose as metal nanoparticles support,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 87–94, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. J. Moon, A. Martini, J. Nairn, J. Simonsen, and J. Youngblood, “Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 3941–3994, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. Tingaut, T. Zimmermann, and G. Sèbe, “Cellulose nanocrystals and microfibrillated cellulose as building blocks for the design of hierarchical functional materials,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 38, pp. 20105–20111, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. N. D. Luong, Y. Lee, and J.-D. Nam, “Highly-loaded silver nanoparticles in ultrafine cellulose acetate nanofibrillar aerogel,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 3116–3121, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y. Lu, Q. Sun, J. Li, and Y. Liu, “Fabrication, characterization and photocatalytic activity of TiO2/cellulose composite aerogel,” Key Engineering Materials, vol. 609-610, pp. 542–546, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. T. W. Hamann, A. B. F. Martinson, J. W. Elam, M. J. Pellin, and J. T. Hupp, “Atomic layer deposition of TiO2 on aerogel templates: new photoanodes for dye-sensitized solar cells,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 27, pp. 10303–10307, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Kusabe, H. Kozuka, S. Abe, and H. Suzuki, “Sol-gel preparation and properties of hydroxypropylcellulose-titania hybrid thin films,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 111–118, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. H. Shin, D.-K. Jeong, J. Lee, M. M. Sung, and J. Kim, “Formation of TiO2 and ZrO2 nanotubes using atomic layer deposition with ultraprecise control of the wall thickness,” Advanced Materials, vol. 16, no. 14, pp. 1197–1200, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L. Melone, L. Altomare, I. Alfieri, A. Lorenzi, L. de Nardo, and C. Punta, “Ceramic aerogels from TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibre templates: synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic properties,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 261, pp. 53–60, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. N. S. Venkataramanan, K. Matsui, H. Kawanami, and Y. Ikushima, “Green synthesis of titania nanowire composites on natural cellulose fibers,” Green Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 18–19, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. K. Nelson and Y. Deng, “Enhanced light scattering from hollow polycrystalline TiO2 particles in a cellulose matrix,” Langmuir, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 975–982, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. Li, C. C. Wan, Y. Lu, and Q. F. Sun, “Fabrication of cellulose aerogel from wheat straw with strong absorptive capacity,” Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 46–52, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  26. B. Wang, R. Karthikeyan, X.-Y. Lu, J. Xuan, and M. K. Leung, “High photocatalytic activity of immobilized TiO2 nanorods on carbonized cotton fibers,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 263, part 2, pp. 659–669, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. B. Erdem, R. A. Hunsicker, G. W. Simmons, E. David Sudol, V. L. Dimonie, and M. S. El-Aasser, “XPS and FTIR surface characterization of TiO2 particles used in polymer encapsulation,” Langmuir, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 2664–2669, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. Hu, S. Duo, T. Liu, W. Li, and R. Zhang, “Low temperature facile synthesis of anatase TiO2 coated multiwalled carbon nanotube nanocomposites,” Materials Letters, vol. 64, no. 22, pp. 2472–2474, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. W.-J. Gong, H.-W. Tao, G.-L. Zi et al., “Visible light photodegradation of dyes over mesoporous titania prepared by using chrome azurol S as template,” Research on Chemical Intermediates, vol. 35, no. 6-7, pp. 751–760, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. Ye, W. Liu, J. Cai et al., “Nanoporous anatase TiO2 mesocrystals: additive-free synthesis, remarkable crystalline-phase stability, and improved lithium insertion behavior,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 4, pp. 933–940, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. P. Mansikkamäki, M. Lahtinen, and K. Rissanen, “Structural changes of cellulose crystallites induced by mercerisation in different solvent systems; determined by powder X-ray diffraction method,” Cellulose, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 233–242, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. J. Trentler, T. E. Denler, J. F. Bertone, A. Agrawal, and V. L. Colvin, “Synthesis of TiO2 nanocrystals by nonhydrolytic solution-based reactions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 121, no. 7, pp. 1613–1614, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. F. Shafizadeh and A. Bradbury, “Thermal degradation of cellulose in air and nitrogen at low temperatures,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1431–1442, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. D. C. Schnitzler and A. J. Zarbin, “Organic/inorganic hybrid materials formed from TiO2 nanoparticles and polyaniline,” Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 378–384, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H. Wang, W. Zhong, P. Xu, and Q. Du, “Polyimide/silica/titania nanohybrids via a novel non-hydrolytic sol-gel route,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 909–914, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Q. Yu, P. Wu, P. Xu, L. Li, T. Liu, and L. Zhao, “Synthesis of cellulose/titanium dioxide hybrids in supercritical carbon dioxide,” Green Chemistry, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1061–1067, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. D. Sun, J. Yang, and X. Wang, “Bacterial cellulose/TiO2 hybrid nanofibers prepared by the surface hydrolysis method with molecular precision,” Nanoscale, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 287–292, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. W.-L. Guo, Z.-X. Yang, and X.-K. Wang, “Sonochemical deposition and characterization of nanophasic TiO2 on silica particles,” Materials Research Innovations, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 11–13, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  39. I. Moon, S. Vigneswaran, and R. Thiruvenkatachari, “A review on UV/TiO2 photocatalytic oxidation process,” 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  40. N. A. Laoufi, D. Tassalit, and F. Bentahar, “The degradation of phenol in water solution by TiO2 photocatalysis in a helical reactor,” Global Nest Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 404–418, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  41. U. Sirimahachai, N. Ndiege, R. Chandrasekharan, S. Wongnawa, and M. A. Shannon, “Nanosized TiO2 particles decorated on SiO2 spheres (TiO2/SiO2): synthesis and photocatalytic activities,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Rani, N. Gupta, and B. Pal, “Superior photodecomposition of pyrene by metal ion-loaded TiO2 catalyst under UV light irradiation,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 2305–2312, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Rǎileanu, M. Crişan, I. Niţoi et al., “TiO2-based nanomaterials with photocatalytic properties for the advanced degradation of xenobiotic compounds from water. A literature survey,” Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, vol. 224, no. 6, article 1548, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Caichao Wan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1312 Views | 833 Downloads | 8 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder