Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2015, Article ID 827641, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/827641
Research Article

Low-Temperature Synthesis and Thermodynamic and Electrical Properties of Barium Titanate Nanorods

1“Ilie Murgulescu” Institute of Physical Chemistry, Splaiul Independentei No. 202, 060021 Bucharest, Romania
2Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, University “Politehnica” of Bucharest, Polizu Street No. 1-7, 011061 Bucharest, Romania

Received 12 January 2015; Revised 20 March 2015; Accepted 24 March 2015

Academic Editor: Joydeep Dutta

Copyright © 2015 Florentina Maxim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Studies regarding the morphology dependence of the perovskite-type oxides functional materials properties are of recent interest. With this aim, nanorods (NRs) and nanocubes (NCs) of barium titanate (BaTiO3) have been successfully synthesized via a hydrothermal route at temperature as low as 408 K, employing barium acetate, titanium isopropoxide, and sodium hydroxide as reagents without any surfactant or template. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), used for the morphology and structure analyses, showed that the NRs were formed by an oriented attachment of the NCs building-blocks with 20 nm average crystallites size. The thermodynamic properties represented by the relative partial molar free energies, enthalpies, and entropies of the oxygen dissolution in the perovskite phase, as well as the equilibrium partial pressure of oxygen, indicated that NRs powders have lower oxygen vacancies concentration than the NCs. This NRs characteristic, together with higher tetragonallity of the structure, leads to the enhancement of the dielectric properties of BaTiO3 ceramics. The results presented in this work show indubitably the importance of the nanopowders morphology on the material properties.

1. Introduction

Since its discovery during the Second World War, barium titanate (BaTiO3) has been extensively studied because of its excellent dielectric, ferroelectric, and piezoelectric properties providing new opportunities for a wide range of applications directed to the electronic devices industry [1, 2]. A renewed scientific interest, especially for nanostructured BaTiO3, has been shown because this is a lead-free ferroelectric material that can overcome the environmental problems related to the release of lead during the production process of lead-based materials [3]. However, when considering the nanostructured forms of barium titanate it must be taken into account that, at nanoscale, a pseudo cubic, nonferroelectric structure, with submicrometric particle size and with a low dielectric constant value, is stabilized at room temperature [4]. Among barium titanate nanostructures, the one-dimensional (1D) morphology as nanotubes, nanorods, or nanowires presents a special interest because this kind of nanoparticles can conserve its high dielectric constant and ferroelectric switchability at nanoscale [5]. Thereby, extensive research has been conducted on different synthesis approaches to obtain 1D barium titanate nanostructures and the most reported are the template assisted sol-gel [6, 7], electrophoretic [8, 9], and hydrothermal [1012] methods. However, when choosing a synthesis method for 1D perovskite-type oxides it must be considered that this is capable of ensuring the complete control over the structure, size, and morphology for the enhanced functional properties at nanoscale preservation. In this view, the hydrothermal method is a very good approach, as it has been demonstrated that the structure, size, and shape–controlled BaTiO3 crystalline nanoparticles can be obtained by hydrothermal treatments of precursors at relatively low temperatures (<573 K) [1316].

The low temperature and no need of sophisticated equipment make from the hydrothermal method a cost and time effective synthesis procedure. However, for 1D BaTiO3 nanostructures, the template assisted methods reported in the literature have the drawback of two-step procedure as firstly the titanium precursor is obtained in 1D morphology, and then the reaction parameters with the barium source must be carefully chosen to enable shape retention during the hydrothermal treatment [1012]. Therefore, to keep the cost and the duration for the hydrothermal procedure reduced, one-step approaches to achieve 1D growth should be evaluated. Here we propose one-step hydrothermal synthesis procedure for the formation of 1D barium titanate by self-assembly nanostructured building-blocks [17]. The success of this strategy under hydrothermal conditions has been demonstrated for the preparation of perovskite KNbO3 nanowires [18, 19]. The authors showed that highly anisotropic potassium niobate 1D nanostructures grown from isotropic hydrothermal medium have slightly distorted cubes as building blocks [19]. Maxim et al. demonstrated that BaTiO3 nanocubes with various sizes can be obtained by a sol-gel hydrothermal method [20].

To the best of our knowledge there are no studies reporting the hydrothermal synthesis of 1D barium titanate by nanocubes self-assembly strategy. This paper demonstrated that BaTiO3 nanorods can be obtained by the mentioned approach. For a more complex characterization, the morphological and structural analysis has been coupled with the evaluation of the thermodynamic and electrical characteristics in relation to significant changes in the overall concentration of defects. By the comparative study of nanorods and nanocubes structures, new features related to the modifications in properties connected with the nanocrystalline state were evidenced.

2. Materials and Methods

The barium titanate synthesis was performed in a high pressure Berghof BR-100 reactor. The precursors and the basic synthesis procedure were previously reported by Maxim et al. [20]. In the present study the synthesis parameters were optimized in order to obtain 1D nanostructures. The sol containing the barium and titanium ions was prepared by adding drop wise 5 mL Ti(C3H7O)4 (Sigma Aldrich > 97%), under vigorous stirring, in a solution of Ba(CH3COO)2 (Merck 99.0–102.0%) in glacial acetic acid (Sigma Aldrich). The Ba/Ti molar ratio was 1. The sol was precipitated in aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (Merck > 99%). The quantity of the acetic acid was calculated after the neutralization with the hydroxide to give a pH higher than 13. The reaction mixture was transferred into the reactor and hydrothermally treated at 408 K (135°C) for 24 h. One synthesis under magnetic stirring and another without magnetic stirring have been performed. Then, the resulted powders were filtered off and washed with distilled water until neutral pH. The as prepared powders were dried in air at 60°C for 12 h.

The powders morphology was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with a FEI Quanta 3D FEG microscope operated at up to 10 kV acceleration voltages and by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with a FEI Tecnai G2-F30 instrument at 300 kV. Structural analysis was conducted by X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique at room temperature, using a Rigaku MiniFlex II diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation ( nm), in 20°–80° 2θ range, with a step length of 0.02° and a fixed counting time = 1 s/step.

A solid state electrochemical method was used to obtain the thermodynamic data represented by the relative partial molar free energies, enthalpies, and entropies of oxygen dissolution in the perovskite phase (, , and ), as well as the equilibrium partial pressures of oxygen as a function of temperature. An electrochemical cell containing 12.84 wt.% yttria stabilized zirconia solid electrolyte and an iron-wüstite reference electrode has been used. The design of the setup, as well as the theoretical and experimental considerations related to the applied method, has been previously described [21]. For these measurements the hydrothermal powders were pressed into pellets weighting ~0.1 g. Measurements were performed in vacuum at a residual gas pressure of 10−7 atm. The electromotive force (EMF) was measured with a Keithley 2000 Multimeter, at 50 K intervals between 773 K and 1273 K, each time waiting until equilibrium conditions were obtained. Equilibrium conditions were achieved when the EMF values for increasing and decreasing temperatures agreed within ±1 mV during 10 min. The free energy change of the galvanic cell is given by the expressionwhere is the steady-state EMF of the cell in volts, and are the oxygen chemical potential of the sample and the reference electrode, respectively, and is the Faraday constant. Knowing the experimental values of the EMF, the relative partial molar free energy of the solution of oxygen in the perovskite phase and hence the pressures of oxygen in equilibrium with the solid can be calculated based on the following formula [21]:

The relative partial molar enthalpies and entropies were obtained according to the known relationships [21]:

For the dielectric properties measurements the hydrothermal powders were pressed into pellets of 13 mm in diameter and around 1.3 mm thickness. For sintering, the pellets were thermally treated at 1623 K for 2 h in a Carbolite furnace with a heating/cooling rate of 2 K/min. Silver electrodes were painted onto both surfaces. A frequency response analyzer, Solartron Analytical 1255A, was used to obtain the dielectric constant (permittivity) and the dielectric losses data from room temperature to about 493 K in the 100 Hz to 1 MHz frequency range.

3. Results and Discussion

SEM investigation showed that cube-shaped nanoparticles with narrow size distribution and average dimension of 55 nm were formed after the hydrothermal treatment with stirring (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)), SEM investigation of the sample denoted BTNCs showed that the SEM analysis of the material prepared without stirring (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)) revealed the formation of faceted elongated particles with average diameter of 147 nm and aspect ratio around 3 suggesting the one-dimensional feature of the sample labelled BTNRs. The value of the aspect ratio indicates the formation of nanorods [22]. As can be observed in the high magnification SEM micrographs (Figures 1(b) and 1(d)) the nanocubes have the tendency to aggregate in one direction suggesting the self-organization of these nanostructures (arrows in Figure 1(b)). Indeed, the nanorods seem to be formed by oriented aggregation of faceted cuboids particles (Figure 1(d)). These observations indicate the possibility of barium titanate particles growth by an oriented attachment mechanism [23, 24] involving nanoparticles with common crystallographic orientations which join together by a planar interface to form a larger particle. To give further insight on the growth mechanism of the nanorods, TEM investigation was used (Figure 2). The bright field image (Figure 2(a)) shows a barium titanate nanorod with smooth edges and parallelepiped shape. The dark field image (Figure 2(b)) shows the single crystal feature as the brightness/contrast is uniform along the entire 1D particle. Additionally, in the dark field image one can observe the planar crystal defects which are marked with arrows in Figure 2(b). These planar defects can be attributed to dislocations generated by imperfect oriented aggregation of the building block nanocrystals [25]. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED, square mark in Figure 2(a)) presented in Figure 2(c) indicates once again that the nanorods have a single crystal characteristics and the growth axis of the nanorods is along (001) crystallographic axis of BaTiO3, which is the polar axis of the tetragonal structure. All TEM results are in accordance with the SEM analysis (Figure 1(d)) and force the idea that the BTNRs could be formed under hydrothermal conditions by a self-assembly oriented attachment mechanism. However, a more detailed growth kinetic study must be performed in order to discriminate between various possible mechanisms (Oswald ripening versus oriented attachment [24]).

Figure 1: SEM images ((a), (c)) and higher magnification (>100 000x) SEM micrographs ((b), (d)) of the samples obtained by hydrothermal treatment with stirring ((a) and (b), BTNCs) and without stirring ((c) and (d), BTNRs).
Figure 2: TEM analysis of BTNRs sample in bright field (a), dark field (b), and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) of the square marked area (c).

Further clarifications regarding the structure of BaTiO3 nanopowder samples were obtained by XRD (Figure 3). It is found that the XRD patterns of both samples can be indexed with JCPDS 75-0211 suggesting the formation of BaTiO3 cubic perovskite phase, characteristic to the barium titanate powders obtained by wet chemical methods, at low temperatures [2628]. Moreover, no secondary phase of barium carbonate is formed, suggesting the reliability of the synthesis procedure proposed in this study (Figure 3(a)). The crystallite size calculated by Williams-Hall method was found to be around 20 nm for both samples and with a lattice parameter of 0.401 nm. In Figure 3(b) the region around the cubic (200) reflection has been selected, 2θ~45°, showing the fine structural differences between the samples. First difference is the relative intensity of the corresponding peak which is 25.5% for BTNRs and 31.4% for BTNCs, respectively. Moreover, the 2θ ~ 45° peak has a FWHM value of 0.547° in the case of BTNRs sample, higher than the corresponding value of 0.475° for the BTNCs sample. These differences denote the broadening of the (200) reflection (Figure 3(b)) for the nanorods and can suggest the formation of predominant tetragonal structure, characteristic to barium titanate powders obtained by high temperature solid-state reaction [29]. To give better inside into the crystal structure, Raman spectroscopy has been performed. Although both samples reveal BaTiO3 Raman bands at around 185 cm−1 (characteristic to hydrothermally prepared barium titanate powders [30]), at ~250, 520, and 720 cm−1 there are some differences suggesting different local structure for BTNCs when compared to BTNRs (Figure 4). The main difference is the broad band at around 299 cm−1 for the BTNCs characteristic to predominant cubic BaTiO3 phase and the sharp peak at around 305 cm−1 for BTNRs sample characteristic to tetragonal barium titanate structure [31]. As the functional properties (high dielectric constant, ferroelectric switchability) are conserved at nanoscale only for the ferroelectric tetragonal BaTiO3, the synthesis methods that allow the preparation of tetragonal barium titanate nanostructures at relatively low temperatures are highly desirable [3236]. In the present study, based on the above results, it is demonstrated that the tetragonality of the nanorods is higher than in the case of barium titanate nanocubes obtained in the same conditions at 408 K.

Figure 3: XRD patterns of BTNRs and BTNCs samples.
Figure 4: Raman spectra of BTNRs and BTNCs samples.

Moreover, in the Raman spectra (Figure 4) for the BTNCs sample it is observed that a shoulder at ~807 cm−1 appears, indicating the lattice defect mode due to the deformation of lattice OH groups incorporated during the hydrothermal synthesis [30]. We have to note here that this Raman band is not present in the case of BTNRs sample. Thus, the structural differences between BTNRs and BTNCs samples can be discussed also in terms of lattice point defects, which are of special importance in functional materials as they control their electronic properties. For the hydrothermal BaTiO3, the hydroxyl groups incorporated in the perovskite lattice must be taken into consideration [37], which are responsible for the formation of donor-type oxygen vacancies and, according to the charge compensation, for the formation of acceptor-type barium and titanium vacancies [28]. Since the oxygen vacancies play a key role in aging and fatigue of ferroelectric materials by impeding domain wall motion or by acting as local disturbances of the polarization [38, 39], information about the concentration and mobility of this type of defects in barium titanate is of special interest. Some information about the correlation of the electrical and structural stability with the defect structure of BaTiO3 was obtained by conductivity and diffusivity measurements [40] or by theoretic calculations [41]. Tanasescu et al. demonstrated that information regarding the concentration and distribution of the oxygen vacancies into the perovskite lattice of complex oxide compounds can be obtained by determining the thermodynamic properties represented by the relative partial molar free energies, enthalpies, and entropies of the oxygen dissolution in the perovskite phase, as well as the equilibrium partial pressure of oxygen [21]. Here we present for the first time the comparison between the thermodynamic properties of hydrothermal prepared BaTiO3 with different morphologies. In Figure 5 the as a function of temperature, in the temperature range of 773–1273 K, for BTNRs and BTNCs samples is presented. Three temperature regions can be observed for the variation of . In the first region (temperature < 973 K), one can observe that the values of BTNRs are with almost 100 kJ mol−1 lower than of BTNCs. The lower the partial molar free energy value is, the lower the oxygen vacancy concentration is [42]. In the 973–1173 K temperature range, the shows weak temperature dependence for nanorods and nanocubes morphologies. At temperatures higher than 1173 K, the partial molar energy has an increasing trend for both samples. It is known that undoped barium titanate undergoes an -type to -type transition in its semiconducting behaviour at oxygen partial pressure higher than 10−6 atm [43, 44]. In Figure 6 the variation of as a function of for the samples BTNCs and BTNRs is presented. First observation is that the domain is below 10−10 atm, and then the data presented here are in the -type regime. Second, it can be observed that the values of obtained for the BTNRs sample are almost one order of magnitude lower than the corresponding values of the oxygen partial pressure of the BTNCs sample in the temperature range from 773 to 973 K. Finally, at temperatures higher than 1073 K, the values obtained for both nanorods and nanocubes morphologies become comparable. Based on the above presented results, the variation of and with temperature suggests the lowest concentration of oxygen vacancies in the perovskite lattice for the barium titanate with 1D morphology in the temperature range below 973 K. Clarifications regarding the binding energy and the order in the oxygen sublattice of BaTiO3 perovskite structure can be achieved by determining the and values in temperature ranges in which the partial molar free energies are linear functions of temperature [21], namely, 773–873 K for BTNCs and 823–973 K for BTNRs. The values are −677.62 kJ/mol for BTNCs and −776.42 kJ/mol for BTNRs. The values are −279.7 J/mol K for BTNCs and −254.8 J/mol K for BTNRs. The decreasing of the enthalpy and the increasing value of the entropy for BTNRs suggest the increased binding energy of oxygen and the random distribution of the oxygen vacancies into the perovskite phase for the 1D barium titanate.

Figure 5: as a function of temperature for BTNRs and BTNCs samples.
Figure 6: Variation of as a function of for the samples BTNCs and BTNRs.

The electric properties of the dense ceramic bodies (SEM microstructure shown in Figure 7) obtained from the hydrothermal BTNCs and BTNRs powders have been evaluated and the variation of the permittivity and the dielectric losses with the frequency (from 1 Hz to 1 MHz) at room temperature and with temperature (from room temperature to 473 K) at a frequency of 10 kHz are presented in Figures 8 and 9, respectively.

Figure 7: SEM microstructures of BTNCs (a) and BTNRs (b) ceramic samples.
Figure 8: Room temperature variation of the permittivity (a) and dielectric losses (b) with frequency for BTNRs and BTNCs ceramic samples.
Figure 9: Variation of the permittivity and dielectric losses with temperature, at a 10 kHz frequency for (a) BTNCs and (b) BTNRs ceramic samples.

The microstructure of BaTiO3 pellets (Figure 7) reveals the formation of dense ceramics with large grains of around 30 μm for the BTNCs sample (Figure 7(a)) and ~100 μm for BTNRs sample (Figure 7(b)). Although the particles shape of the initial hydrothermal powders was not retained, differences in the grains morphology can be observed. The BTNCs ceramics present rounded edges grains. Differently, for the BTNRs ceramics abnormally large faceted grains embedded in fine grains matrix are formed. This abnormal grain growth is well known in BaTiO3-based ceramics obtained by conventional air-sintering [45].

Figure 8(a) shows that the ceramic sample obtained with BTNRs powders exhibits two times higher dielectric permittivity at room temperature than the BTNCs ceramic. Moreover, the variation of with the frequency is almost constant for the BTNRs and decreases with frequency increasing for the BTNCs. In Figure 8(b) one can note that for both ceramic samples the dielectric loss decreases with frequency increasing. Moreover, the values of this dielectric parameter are below 0.05, values comparable with the earlier reports of conventionally sintered barium titanate ceramics [46, 47].

The first important common observation of Figures 9(a) and 9(b) is the presence of the sharp peak in the permittivity versus temperature curves for both BTNCs and BTNRs ceramics, denoting the permittivity anomaly located at the ferroelectric to paraelectric transition temperature (Curie temperature ) [48]. The second observation is the low dielectric losses for both samples, with average values lower than 0.05 over the entire temperature range. By comparing the dielectric constant of the samples it can be observed that the BTNRs have approximately 4 times higher the maximum permittivity value than the BTNCs ceramics (at is 9432 for BTNRs and 2473 for BTNCs). The dielectric constant value obtained for the BTNRs sample is among the highest reported for barium titanate ceramics prepared from hydrothermal powders [46, 49, 50]. Moreover, it is known that the value of the dielectric constant of the BaTiO3 ceramics, beside the initial powders synthesis method, is also dependent on the sintering procedure and a colossal permittivity of around 40 000 was reported for microwave-sintered barium titanate [51]. However, the value of 9432 obtained in the present study for the BTNRs ceramics permittivity is still higher than the values normally reported for conventionally sintered barium titanate [47, 51]. From the dependence of the permittivity on the temperature (Figure 9), the decreasing of the Curie temperature can be also noticed when hydrothermal BTNRs powders are used for the barium titanate ceramics ( is decreasing from 401 K for BTNCs to 396 K for BTNRs). Moreover the dielectric losses of BTNRs ceramics are lower than the corresponding values of BTNCs sample (<0.03 for BTNCs and <0.01 for BTNRs). The results obtained from the dielectric properties evaluation demonstrated the enhancement of these properties when hydrothermal prepared powders with 1D morphology are used for BaTiO3 ceramics.

4. Conclusions

In summary, NRs and NCs of barium titanate have been effectively prepared by surfactant- and template-free hydrothermal treatment of barium acetate and titanium isopropoxide in the presence of NaOH, at 408 K, for 24 h. Nanocrystals with ~20 nm average size have been obtained. The morphological and structural investigation showed that the formation of the NRs powders, with more tetragonal structure, can be attributed to the oriented attachment of the nanocubes building blocks.

The variation of the thermodynamic properties , , and , as well as with temperature, indicated that 1D BaTiO3 nanopowders have the lowest concentration of oxygen vacancies, the highest binding energy of oxygen, and the lowest concentration of oxygen vacancies randomly distributed into the perovskite lattice and the highest binding energy of oxygen.

The evaluation of the dielectric properties demonstrated that the maximum permittivity increases and the Curie point and dielectric losses decrease when NRs are used as hydrothermal nanopowders for barium titanate ceramics. These nanostructures can be promising candidates as energy harvesters in nanoelectromechanical systems (NEMS).

The results presented in this work are significant in morphology—properties correlation for the perovskite-type oxide nanomaterials, indicating the enhancement of the thermodynamic and electric properties for 1D shape.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS-UEFISCDI, for the Grant no. PN-II-RU-TE-2011-3-0160 and the Romanian Government support for the acquisition of research infrastructure under Project INFRANANOCHEM/2009-2010. Special thanks are also addressed to Manuela Tanase for experimental help and to Dr. Irina Atkinson and Dr. Simona Petrescu for XRD and Raman measurements, respectively. Many acknowledgments are addressed to the members of the Electroceramics group of Prof. Dr. Paula Vilarinho, from CICECO University of Aveiro, Portugal, for assistance regarding the experimental procedure for the electric properties evaluation.

References

  1. N. Izyumskaya, Y. Alivov, and H. Morkoç, “Oxides, oxides, and more oxides: high-oxides, ferroelectrics, ferromagnetics, and multiferroics,” Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences, vol. 34, no. 3-4, pp. 89–179, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. M. Vijatovic, J. D. Bobic, and B. D. Stojanovic, “History and challenges of barium titanate. Part II,” Science of Sintering, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 235–244, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Rödel, W. Jo, K. T. P. Seifert, E.-M. Anton, T. Granzow, and D. Damjanovic, “Perspective on the development of lead-free piezoceramics,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1153–1177, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Arlt, D. Hennings, and G. Dewith, “Dielectric properties of fine-grained barium titanate ceramics,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1619–1625, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, and M. D. Glinchuk, “Ferroelectricity enhancement in confined nanorods: direct variational method,” Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 73, no. 21, Article ID 214106, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Y. Zhang, F. S. Jiang, G. Qu, and C. Y. Lin, “Synthesis of single-crystalline perovskite barium titanate nanorods by a combined route based on sol-gel and surfactant-templated methods,” Materials Letters, vol. 62, no. 15, pp. 2225–2228, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. A. Hernandez, K.-S. Chang, E. R. Fisher, and P. K. Dorhout, “Sol-gel template synthesis and characterization of BaTiO3 and PbTiO3 nanotubes,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 480–482, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. J. Limmer and G. Cao, “Sol-gel electrophoretic deposition for the growth of oxide nanorods,” Advanced Materials, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 427–431, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Žagar, F. Hernandez-Ramirez, J. D. Prades, J. R. Morante, A. Rečnik, and M. Čeh, “Characterization of individual barium titanate nanorods and their assessment as building blocks of new circuit architectures,” Nanotechnology, vol. 22, no. 38, Article ID 385501, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Koka, Z. Zhou, H. Tang, and H. A. Sodano, “Controlled synthesis of ultra-long vertically aligned BaTiO3 nanowire arrays for sensing and energy harvesting applications,” Nanotechnology, vol. 25, no. 37, Article ID 375603, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. A. Lamberti, N. Garino, K. Bejtka et al., “Synthesis of ferroelectric BaTiO3 tube-like arrays by hydrothermal conversion of a vertically aligned TiO2 nanotube carpet,” New Journal of Chemistry, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 2024–2030, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. P. Padture and X. Wei, “Hydrothermal synthesis of thin films of barium titanate ceramic nano-tubes at 200°C,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 2215–2217, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. Maxim, Bottom up strategies for the morphology control of BaTiO3 particulates [Ph.D. thesis], University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal, 2010.
  14. N. Bao, L. Shen, G. Srinivasan, K. Yanagisawa, and A. Gupta, “Shape-controlled monocrystalline ferroelectric barium titanate nanostructures: from nanotubes and nanowires to ordered nanostructures,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 23, pp. 8634–8642, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Cao, K. Zhu, Q. Wu, Q. Gu, and J. Qiu, “Hydrothermally synthesized barium titanate nanostructures from K2Ti4O9 precursors: morphology evolution and its growth mechanism,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 57, pp. 162–169, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. F. Maxim, P. Ferreira, and P. Vilarinho, “Strategies for the structure and morphology control of BaTiO3 nanoparticles,” in New Applications of Nanomaterials Micro and Nanoengineering, A. C. Ion, D. Dascalu, G. Carja, and M. L. Ciurea, Eds., pp. 83–97, Editura Academiei Romane, Bucharest, Romania, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  17. Y. Xia, P. Yang, Y. Sun et al., “One-dimensional nanostructures: Synthesis, characterization, and applications,” Advanced Materials, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 353–389, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Magrez, E. Vasco, J. W. Seo, C. Dicker, N. Setter, and L. Forró, “Growth of single-crystalline KNbO3 nanostructures,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 58–61, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. Vasco, A. Magrez, L. Forró, and N. Setter, “Growth kinetics of one-dimensional KNbO3 nanostructures by hydrothermal processing routes,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 30, pp. 14331–14334, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. Maxim, P. Ferreira, and P. M. Vilarinho, “Morphology control of BaTiO3 nanoparticles prepared by sol-gel hydrothermal method,” Microscopy and Microanalysis, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 111–112, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Tanasescu, N. D. Totir, and D. I. Marchidan, “Thermodynamic data of the perovskite-type LaMnO3±x and La0.7Sr0.3MnO3±x by a solid-state electrochemical technique,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 43, no. 12-13, pp. 1675–1681, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. J. Murphy and N. R. Jana, “Controlling the aspect ratio of inorganic nanorods and nanowires,” Advanced Materials, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 80–82, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  23. R. L. Penn and J. F. Banfield, “Oriented attachment and growth, twinning, polytypism, and formation of metastable phases: insights from nanocrystalline TiO2,” The American Mineralogist, vol. 83, pp. 1077–1082, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. Zhang, F. Huang, and Z. Lin, “Progress of nanocrystalline growth kinetics based on oriented attachment,” Nanoscale, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18–34, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. L. Penn and J. F. Banfield, “Imperfect oriented attachment: dislocation generation in defect-free nanocrystals,” Science, vol. 281, no. 5379, pp. 969–971, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. Hennings and S. Schreinemacher, “Characterization of hydrothermal barium titanate,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. E.-W. Shi, C.-T. Xia, W.-Z. Zhong, B.-G. Wang, and C.-D. Feng, “Crystallographic properties of hydrothermal barium titanate crystallites,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1567–1572, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. F. K. Hennings, C. Metzmacher, and B. S. Schreinemacher, “Defect chemistry and microstructure of hydrothermal barium titanate,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 179–182, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Vijatovic, J. Bobic, and B. Stojanovic, “History and challenges of barium titanate: part I,” Science of Sintering, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 155–165, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. T. Noma, S. Wada, M. Yano, and T. Suzuki, “Analysis of lattice vibration in fine particles of barium titanate single crystal including the lattice hydroxyl group,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 5223–5233, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Y. Shiratori, C. Pithan, J. Dornseiffer, and R. Waser, “Raman scattering studies on nanocrystalline BaTiO3 Part I—isolated particles and aggregates,” Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 1288–1299, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. J. Li, W. X. Wei, J. L. Hai, L. X. Gao, Z. W. Gao, and Y. Y. Fan, “Preparation and electric-field response of novel tetragonal barium titanate,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 574, pp. 212–216, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. P. R. Ren, H. Q. Fan, X. Wang, and K. Liu, “A novel approach to prepare tetragonal BaTiO3 nanopowders,” Materials Letters, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 212–214, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. Q. Qi, T. Peng, Y. M. Hu et al., “Direct synthesis of ultrafine tetragonal BaTiO3 nanoparticles at room temperature,” Nanoscale Research Letters, vol. 6, article 466, pp. 1–4, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. Y. Xie, S. Yin, T. Hashimoto, Y. Tokano, A. Sasaki, and T. Sato, “Low temperature synthesis of tetragonal BaTiO3 by a novel composite-hydroxide-mediated approach and its dielectric properties,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 699–704, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. I. Tsuyumoto, M. Kobayashi, T. Are, and N. Yamazaki, “Nanosized tetragonal BaTiO3 powders synthesized by a new peroxo-precursor decomposition method,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 3015–3020, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. Vivekanandan and T. R. N. Kutty, “Characterization of barium titanate fine powders formed from hydrothermal crystallization,” Powder Technology, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 181–192, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. U. Robels and G. Arlt, “Domain wall clamping in ferroelectrics by orientation of defects,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 3454–3460, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. G. Arlt and H. Neumann, “Internal bias in ferroelectric ceramics: origin and time dependence,” Ferroelectrics, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 109–120, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. C.-R. Song and H.-I. Yoo, “Chemical diffusivity of BaTiO3-δ III. Conductivity-nonstoichiometry (δ) correlation in a mixed n/p regime,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 289–299, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. P. Erhart and K. Albe, “Thermodynamics of mono-and di-vacancies in barium titanate,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 102, no. 8, Article ID 084111, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. Tanasescu, Z. Yáng, J. Martynczuk et al., “Effects of A-site composition and oxygen nonstoichiometry on the thermodynamic stability of compounds in the Ba-Sr-Co-Fe-O system,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 200, pp. 354–362, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. D.-K. Lee and H.-I. Yoo, “Oxygen nonstoichiometry of undoped BaTiO3-δ,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 144, no. 1-2, pp. 87–97, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. H.-S. Kwon, H.-I. Yoo, C.-H. Kim, and K.-H. Hur, “Semiconductor-to-insulator transition of undoped-BaTiO3 in quenched state,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 107, no. 8, Article ID 083702, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. B.-K. Lee, S.-Y. Chung, and S.-J. L. Kang, “Grain boundary faceting and abnormal grain growth in BaTiO3,” Acta Materialia, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1575–1580, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. P. Pinceloup, C. Courtois, A. Leriche, and B. Thierry, “Hydrothermal synthesis of nanometer-sized barium titanate powders: control of barium/titanium ratio, sintering, and dielectric properties,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 82, no. 11, pp. 3049–3056, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. J.-C. M'Peko, J. S. C. Francis, and R. Raj, “Field-assisted sintering of undoped BaTiO3: microstructure evolution and dielectric permittivity,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 34, pp. 3655–3660, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. D. Hennings, M. Klee, and R. Waser, “Advanced dielectrics: bulk ceramics and thin Films,” Advanced Materials, vol. 3, no. 7-8, pp. 334–340, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. P. K. Dutta, R. Asiaie, S. A. Akbar, and W. D. Zhu, “Hydrothermal synthesis and dielectric properties of tetragonal BaTiO3,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 1542–1548, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. N. J. Joshi, G. S. Grewal, V. Shrinet, T. P. Govindan, and A. Pratap, “Synthesis and dielectric behavior of nano-scale barium titanate,” IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 83–90, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. H. Han, D. Ghosh, J. L. Jones, and J. C. Nino, “Colossal permittivity in microwave-sintered barium titanate and effect of annealing on dielectric properties,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 485–490, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus