Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2015, Article ID 908689, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/908689
Research Article

Effects of Two Different Cellulose Nanofiber Types on Properties of Poly(vinyl alcohol) Composite Films

1Nanotec-KMUTT Center of Excellence on Hybrid Nanomaterials for Alternative Energy, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
2School of Energy, Environment and Materials, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), Bangkok 1014, Thailand
3Learning Institute, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), Bangkok 10140, Thailand

Received 2 December 2014; Revised 27 January 2015; Accepted 28 January 2015

Academic Editor: Alain Dufresne

Copyright © 2015 Kitti Yuwawech et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N. Lavoine, I. Desloges, A. Dufresne, and J. Bras, “Microfibrillated cellulose—its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 735–764, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. X. Xu, F. Liu, L. Jiang, J. Y. Zhu, D. Haagenson, and D. P. Wiesenborn, “Cellulose nanocrystals vs. Cellulose nanofibrils: a comparative study on their microstructures and effects as polymer reinforcing agents,” ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 2999–3009, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. I. Siró and D. Plackett, “Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review,” Cellulose, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 459–494, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Tanpichai, F. Quero, M. Nogi et al., “Effective young's modulus of bacterial and microfibrillated cellulose fibrils in fibrous networks,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1340–1349, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Quero, M. Nogi, H. Yano et al., “Optimization of the mechanical performance of bacterial cellulose/poly(L-lactic) acid composites,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 321–330, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. J. Eichhorn, A. Dufresne, M. Aranguren et al., “Current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–33, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. Chen, K. Abe, K. Uetani, H. Yu, Y. Liu, and H. Yano, “Individual cotton cellulose nanofibers: pretreatment and fibrillation technique,” Cellulose, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1517–1528, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Jonoobi, Y. Aitomäki, A. P. Mathew, and K. Oksman, “Thermoplastic polymer impregnation of cellulose nanofibre networks: morphology, mechanical and optical properties,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 58, pp. 30–35, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Saito, R. Kuramae, J. Wohlert, L. A. Berglund, and A. Isogai, “An ultrastrong nanofibrillar biomaterial: the strength of single cellulose nanofibrils revealed via sonication-induced fragmentation,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 248–253, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Bulota, K. Kreitsmann, M. Hughes, and J. Paltakari, “Acetylated microfibrillated cellulose as a toughening agent in poly(lactic acid),” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. E448–E457, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Tanpichai, W. W. Sampson, and S. J. Eichhorn, “Stress-transfer in microfibrillated cellulose reinforced poly(lactic acid) composites using Raman spectroscopy,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1145–1152, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Lu, T. Wang, and L. T. Drzal, “Preparation and properties of microfibrillated cellulose polyvinyl alcohol composite materials,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 738–746, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Iwamoto, S. Yamamoto, S.-H. Lee, and T. Endo, “Mechanical properties of polypropylene composites reinforced by surface-coated microfibrillated cellulose,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 59, pp. 26–29, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Iwatake, M. Nogi, and H. Yano, “Cellulose nanofiber-reinforced polylactic acid,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 2103–2106, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. N. Nakagaito and H. Yano, “Novel high-strength biocomposites based on microfibrillated cellulose having nano-order-unit web-like network structure,” Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 155–159, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Šturcováa, S. J. Eichhorn, and M. C. Jarvis, “Vibrational spectroscopy of biopolymers under mechanical stress: processing cellulose spectra using bandshift difference integrals,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 2688–2691, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Guhados, W. Wan, and J. L. Hutter, “Measurement of the elastic modulus of single bacterial cellulose fibers using atomic force microscopy,” Langmuir, vol. 21, no. 14, pp. 6642–6646, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. N. Nakagaito, S. Iwamoto, and H. Yano, “Bacterial cellulose: the ultimate nano-scalar cellulose morphology for the production of high-strength composites,” Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 93–97, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K.-Y. Lee, T. Tammelin, K. Schulfter, H. Kiiskinen, J. Samela, and A. Bismarck, “High performance cellulose nanocomposites: comparing the reinforcing ability of bacterial cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 4078–4086, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y.-C. Hsieh, H. Yano, M. Nogi, and S. J. Eichhorn, “An estimation of the Young's modulus of bacterial cellulose filaments,” Cellulose, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 507–513, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. I. Sakurada, Y. Nukushina, and T. Ito, “Experimental determination of the elastic modulus of crystalline regions in oriented polymers,” Journal of Polymer Science, vol. 57, no. 165, pp. 651–660, 1962. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. T. Nishino, K. Takano, K. Nakamae et al., “Elastic modulus of the crystalline regions of cellulose triesters,” Journal of Polymer Science, Part B: Polymer Physics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 611–618, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. H. Yano, J. Sugiyama, A. N. Nakagaito et al., “Optically transparent composites reinforced with networks of bacterial nanofibers,” Advanced Materials, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 153–155, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. G. Siaueira, J. Bras, and A. Dufresne, “Cellulose whiskers versus microfibrils: influence of the nature of the nanoparticle and its surface functionalization on the thermal and mechanical properties of nanocomposites,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 425–432, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. Gong, J. Pyo, A. P. Mathew, and K. Oksman, “Tensile behavior, morphology and viscoelastic analysis of cellulose nanofiber-reinforced (CNF) polyvinyl acetate (PVAc),” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1275–1282, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. Zimmermann, E. Pöhler, and T. Geiger, “Cellulose fibrils for polymer reinforcement,” Advanced Engineering Materials, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 754–761, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. K. Y. Lee, Y. Aitomäki, L. A. Berglund, K. Oksman, and A. Bismarck, “On the use of nanocellulose as reinforcement in polymer matrix composites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 105, pp. 15–27, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. W. Chen, H. Yu, Y. Liu, P. Chen, M. Zhang, and Y. Hai, “Individualization of cellulose nanofibers from wood using high-intensity ultrasonication combined with chemical pretreatments,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 1804–1811, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. Bondeson and K. Oksman, “Polylactic acid/cellulose whisker nanocomposites modified by polyvinyl alcohol,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 2486–2492, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. Aulin, M. Gällstedt, and T. Lindström, “Oxygen and oil barrier properties of microfibrillated cellulose films and coatings,” Cellulose, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 559–574, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. N. Frone, D. M. Panaitescu, D. D. Spataru, C. Radovici, R. Trusca, and R. Somoghi, “Preparation and characterization of PVA composites with cellulose nanofibers obtained by ultrasonication,” BioResources, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 487–512, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus