Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2017 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 8178314 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8178314

M. Z. H. Khan, "Graphene Oxide Modified Electrodes for Dopamine Sensing", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2017, Article ID 8178314, 11 pages, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8178314

Graphene Oxide Modified Electrodes for Dopamine Sensing

Academic Editor: Giuseppe Compagnini
Received07 Dec 2016
Revised09 Mar 2017
Accepted15 Mar 2017
Published16 Apr 2017

Abstract

Dopamine (DA) is one of the most important catecholamine neurotransmitters that plays an important role in the central nervous, renal, hormonal, and cardiovascular systems. Since its discovery, tremendous effort has been made and various techniques have been developed for the DA detection. Recently, graphene-based materials have attracted a tremendous amount of attention due to their high sensitivity and rapid response towards effective detection of DA. This review focuses on current advances of graphene-based materials for DA detection based on recent articles published in the last five years.

1. Introduction

Dopamine (DA) is an important catecholamine neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system and plays a very important role in memory, hormonal, and cardiovascular systems [14]. The imbalance or low levels of their contents are likely to cause neurological disorder such as senile dementia, HIV infection, schizophrenia, and Parkinson’s disease [510]. Therefore, the accurate and rapid determination of DA at submicromolar concentration level is crucial for diagnoses and monitoring and gained immense attention among numerous researchers. In the last few decades, tremendous effort has been made on developing analytical methods with a high sensitivity and good selectivity for detecting DA in biological samples.

In physiological processes of human metabolism, ascorbic acid (AA), dopamine (DA), and uric acid (UA) are seen as crucial small biomolecules and well known to coexist in biological matrixes such as blood and urine as well as in extracellular fluid at a high concentration level. Moreover, due to almost similar potential of DA, AA, and UA, they can be oxidized easily and cause great interferences on the bare working electrode resulting in poor response resolution in DA determination. Thereby, simultaneous determination of DA, AA, and UA by electrochemical method is necessary and have been reported widely.

Due to the similarity of oxidized potentials of DA, uric acid (UA), and ascorbic acid (AA), many electrochemical methods have been established for simultaneous determination in their mixture [1119]. However, these analytical techniques have some limitations, such as being time-consuming, low-sensitivity, complicating pretreatment, and being of high in cost. Recently, chemical modified electrodes have been developed and reported to effectively detect DA with enhanced sensitivity and selectivity [2023]. Among them, graphene is extensively used to fabricate electrochemical sensors and hold a great promise as ideal candidate sensing platforms. Graphene is one of the most promising and versatile materials discovered ever, of which the first truly two-dimensional material is its single sheet that shows many outstanding properties including high charge mobility, high thermal and electrical conduction, transparency, and good mechanical properties [2428]. Considering the characteristic of the graphene and its excellent properties, graphene-based nanomaterials [29, 30], chemically reduced graphene oxide (CR-GO) [31], sulfonated graphene (s-GR) [32], chitosan-graphene [33], and electrochemically reduced graphene oxide (ERGO) [34], have been reported to effectively detect DA, UA, and AA.

In this review, attention is focused on summarizing and highlighting the categories of graphene-based materials and their application for the detection of dopamine.

2. Electrochemistry of Graphene

The basic electrochemical behaviors, like electron transfer rate, electrochemical potential window, redox behavior, and so forth, are important parameters and should be studied first for any potential application. The high electron mobility at room temperature [35] and a low resistivity at low temperatures [36] are the excellent electronic qualities of graphene and have been a much studied subject. The electrochemical properties of graphene, such as well-defined redox peaks [37] and low charge resistance [38], are also of high contemporary interest.

Graphene-based electrodes exhibit well-defined redox peaks, of which the redox processes are predominantly diffusion-controlled [37, 39, 40]. The unique electronic structure of graphene with high density of the electronic states and the surface physicochemistry of graphene are beneficial for fast electron transfer [37, 41, 42]. A variety of oxygenated species possessed by the edges of graphene sheets can significantly increase the rate of electron transfer by creating specific surface functional groups [43]. The edge-plane defect sites on graphene with high density provide multiple active sites for electron transfer to biospecies [44]. Compared to graphite, graphene has significantly more uniform distribution of electrochemically active sites and its special 2D structure making it very efficient in detecting adsorbed molecules [45, 46].

3. Electrochemical Detection of Dopamine

It turned out that catecholamines are very convenient models for studying the mechanism of the metal-molecule interaction and determining the adsorption of these flat molecules on single crystal metal surfaces. Dopamine (DA) is one of the most important catecholamine neurotransmitters in the mammalian central nervous system and a topic of much interest in the development of electrochemical sensors [4749].

Due to its electroactivity, DA molecules can be easily oxidized on the electrode. In the last few decades, DA detection has gained much attention. Rapid, simple, and sensitive electrochemical methods with modified electrodes have shown promising platform for detection of DA. Numerous materials, such as metal nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, fullerenes, polymers, graphene, and enzymes, have been used as modifiers to construct highly sensitive and selective DA biosensors to distinguish the coexistence of DA, AA, and UA in a biological environment [5054]. Table 1 shows analytical data of DA detection in presence of AA and UA obtained from use of different modified electrodes.


ElectrodeLinear range (μM)Detection limit (μM)Reference

Ag-Pt/nanofiber10–5000.11[55]
MWCNT/CCE0.5–1000.31[56]
HNCMS/GCE3–750.02[57]
PtNPs-MWCNT/GCE0.06–2.030.05[58]
OMC/Nafion1–900.5[59]
PDDA@HCNTs/GCE2.5–100.08[23]
Nanostructured gold10–1005[60]
2-Amino-thiazol film/GCE5–255[61]
Meso-SiO2/CPE0.4–250.1[62]
CAT/ZnONps/CPE5–413[63]

MWCNT/CCE: multiwalled carbon nanotube modified carbon-ceramic electrode; HNCMS/GCE: hollow nitrogen-doped carbon microspheres modified glassy carbon electrode; PtNPs-MWCNT/GCE: Pt nanoparticles decorated multiwall carbon nanotubes modified glassy carbon electrode; OMC: ordered mesoporous carbon; PDDA@HCNTs: poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) functionalized helical carbon nanotubes; Meso-SiO2/CPE: mesoporous silica nanoparticles/carbon paste electrode; CAT/ZnONps/CPE; catalase ZnO nanoparticles modified carbon paste electrode.

4. Graphene Oxide (GO) Modified Electrode for Dopamine Sensing

Graphene, a “rising-star” carbon material has attracted enormous interest in science communities and a promising candidate in many fields such as nanomaterials, supercapacitors, nanoelectronics, catalysis, nanophotonics, and sensors. Owing to its unique electronic, mechanical, and thermal properties, graphene has been intensively employed as modification materials on the surface of different electrodes. Up to now, many modified electrodes supported by graphene oxide, such as graphene-metal oxide nanocomposite, GO-carbon dot composite, GO-bimetallic nanoclusters, layer-by-layer assembled multilayer films of GO/metal nanoparticles, GO/polymer nanosheets, and GO/hybrid polymer composite [6474], have been successfully prepared for the electrochemical detection of dopamine and have shown their unique properties. Even so, the development of novel graphene combined with AuNPs nanocomposite for the electrochemical determination of dopamine remains interesting and challenging.

4.1. Nanostructured Material Modified GO

An electrochemical sensor using activated graphene (AGR)/MWCNT nanocomposite loaded Au nanoclusters (AuNCs) was developed by Abdelwahab and Shim for the simultaneous determination of DA, AA, UA, and folic acid (FA) [75]. AuNCs modified electrode was reported to provide a stable large surface area that effectively improved sensitivity of the sensor. The details fabrication of AuNCs/AGR/MWCNT nanocomposite sensor was presented in Figure 1(a). SEM image shows the growth and attachment of AuNCs onto the AGR/MWCNT layer with an average diameter of 50 nm (Figure 1(b)). The proposed nanocomposite sensor showed satisfactory results and sharp oxidation peaks of AA, DA, UA, and FA as compared to a bare electrode during SWV measurement as shown in Figure 1(c).

On the other hand, Hu et al. have used reduced graphene oxide- (rGO-) carbon dots (CDs) composite film for sensitive detection of DA with concentration in the range from 0.01000 uM to 450.0 uM with the detection limit as 1.5 nM [76]. An excellent environment for DA oxidation was reposted using the rGO-CDs composite that also acts as a barrier to prevent other interfering substances during DA detection. The CDs had carboxyl groups with negative charge, which could make the surface of the electrode more conductive and enabled interaction and electron communication between rGO and DA. Other researcher developed a novel gold nanoparticles/tryptophan-functionalized graphene composite (AuNPs/Trp-GR) modified electrode that exhibited excellent electrocatalytic properties towards the oxidation of dopamine [66].

One-step electrodeposition of Pt–Au bimetallic nanoclusters loaded onto graphene oxide- (GO-) electrochemically reduced GO (ERGO) graphene (Au–Pt/GO–ERGO) was developed and investigated by Liu at al. for sensitive and simultaneous detection of DA and UA [77]. It was observed that Au–Pt/GO–ERGO provide better mass transport of reactants to the electrocatalyst compared with other metal anchored GO. The modified electrode showed a good anti-interference ability, reproducibility, and high stability. The electrochemical performance of the carbon nitride nanosheets-graphene oxide (CNNS-GO) composite was investigated for simultaneously detection of AA, DA, and UA by Zhang et al. [78]. A remarkable electrocatalytic activity was observed with their composite modified electrode towards determination of DA with low detection limit (0.096 uM) and good sensitivity. Figure 2(a) shows the possible response mechanism of graphitic CNNS-GO composite. It was demonstrated that, after modification of GCE with CNNS-GO, the peak potential of AA, DA, and UA clearly separated as shown in Figure 2(b).

A promising dopamine sensor based on Fe3O4@graphene nanospheres (GNs) modified glassy carbon electrode was developed by Zhang et al. [73]. It was proved that the surface of Fe3O4@GNs/Nafion/GCE can easily attract the positively charged aromatic DA molecules through π-π stacking and electrostatic attraction. In addition, a simple and suitable method was explained for the quantitative determination of micromole level of DA. Zhao et al. have developed a label-free fluorescence-based method using graphene quantum dots (GQDs) for selective and sensitive detection of dopamine (DA) [79]. Considering excellent biocompatibility, GQDs are superior in comparison with conventional semiconductor QDs. Figure 2(c) represents the possible mechanism of fluorescent sensing strategy for the detection of DA. The fluorescence spectra of the GQDs in the presence of different concentrations of DA were shown in Figure 2(d).

Another promising electrochemical sensor based on novel graphene-tantalum wire (Gr/Ta) electrodes was prepared by Zhao et al. with electrochemical deposition of MgO nanobelts (denoted as MgO/Gr/Ta) for the simultaneous detection of AA, DA, and UA in biological fluid [80]. The strong electrocatalytic properties of MgO nanobelts with large surface area can increase the peak separation between analytes during simultaneous determination of AA, DA, and UA (Tables 2 and 3).


ElectrodeLinear range (μM)Detection limit (μM)Reference

AuNCs/AGR/MWCNT1–2100.08[75]
rGO-CDs/GCE0.01–4500.015[76]
AuNPs/Trp-GR0.5–4110.056[66]
Au–Pt/GO–ERGO0.06–4980.02[77]
Fe3O4/r-GO/GC0.4–3.50.08[81]
Au/RGO/GCE6.8–411.4[17, 18]
GQDs–TiO20.02–1050.067[82]
CNNS-GO1–200.096[78]
Fe3O4@GNs/Nafion/GC0.02–1300.007[73]
MgO/Gr/Ta0.1–70.15[80]

AuNCs/AGR/MWCNT: gold nanoclusters/activated graphene/MWCNT nanocomposites; rGO-CDs/GCE: reduced graphene oxide-carbon dot composite; AuNPs/Trp-GR: gold nanoparticles/tryptophan-functionalized graphene nanocomposites; Au–Pt/GO–ERGO: Au–Pt bimetallic nanoclusters decorated on graphene oxide-electrochemically reduced GO; Fe3O4/r-GO/GC: Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles/reduced graphene oxide nanosheets modified glassy carbon; Au/RGO/GCE- Au nanoplates and reduced graphene oxide modified glassy carbon electrode; GQDs-TiO2: graphene quantum dots-TiO2 nanocomposites; CNNS-GO: carbon nitride nanosheets doped graphene oxide; Fe3O4@GNs/Nafion/GC: Nafion covered core-shell structured Fe3O4@graphene nanospheres modified glassy carbon electrode; MgO/Gr/Ta: MgO nanobelt-modified graphene-tantalum wire electrode.

ElectrodeLinear range (μM)Detection limit (μM)Reference

AuNP/Gr/OPPy-MIP/GCE0.5–80.1[65]
Si-MG-MIP8–2001.5[83]
GO-Ag/PLL/GCE0.1–100.03[84]
PILs/PPy/GO4–180.07[67]
PEDOT/RGO0.1–1750.03[86]
PAM/rGO/GCE0.3–500.1[87]
PFeTPP/PSS-Gr0.1–400.05[72]
PPy/GQDs0.005–80.0001[74]

AuNP/Gr/OPPy-MIP/GCE: gold nanoparticles, graphene, molecularly imprinted overoxidized polypyrrole; Si-MG-MIP: silanized magnetic graphene oxide-molecularly imprinted polymer; GO-Ag/PLL/GCE: graphene oxide-Ag/poly-L-lysine modified glassy carbon electrode; PILs/PPy/GO: poly(ionic liquids) functionalized polypyrrole/graphene oxide nanosheets; PEDOT/RGO: conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) doped with reduced graphene oxide; PAM/rGO/GCE: polyacrylamide/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites; PFeTPP/PSS-Gr: poly[iron (II) tetraphenylporphyrin] and poly(sodium-p-styre-nesulfonate) modified graphene; PPy/GQDs: polypyrrole/graphene quantum dots core hybrids.
4.2. Polymer Modified GO

Recently the design of novel nanocomposites with combination of graphene and conductive polymers plays a challenging role in elaboration of hybrid electrodes with (bio)sensing properties. Due to long-term environmental stability, strong adherence to electrode surface, high electric conductivity, large active sites, good selectivity, and biocompatibility, polymer modified electrodes have been paid increasing attention and become a research focus [65, 83, 84].

Do et al. have developed a biosensor for rapid detection of DA with graphene (Gr) films and molecularly imprinted (MIP) overoxidized polypyrrole (OPPy) modified electrode [65]. The prepared electrode showed a good recognition capacity for template molecule (DA) in the presence of other structurally similar molecules (AA, UA). The preparation of AuNP/Gr/OPPy-MIP/GCE electrodes, involving four main steps, is shown in Figure 3(a). The CV (cyclic voltammograms) and DPV (differential pulse voltammograms) responses of electrochemical signals to different DA concentrations in the presence of 1 mM AA and 50 μM UA are demonstrated in Figures 3(b) and 3(c). A reduced graphene oxide- (RGO-) polypyrrole composite electrode was developed by Fritea et al. for sensing of catechol and dopamine [85]. They reported that their developed electrode could have promising applications in the miniaturization of amperometric biosensors for in vivo measurements of low level of neurotransmitters. Similarly, Guo et al. have developed graphene oxide-Ag/poly-L-lysine modified glassy carbon electrode (GO-Ag/PLL/GCE) for the determination of DA in the presence of AA. The GO-Ag/PLL/GCE electrode improved the DA electrochemical catalytic oxidation, which demonstrates that GO-Ag/PLL/GCE has a remarkable electrocatalytic activity towards the oxidation of DA [84]. Figure 3(d) represents the immobilization and hybridization of DA on the GO-Ag/PLL. The excellent electrocatalytic activity of GO-Ag/PLL/GCE towards the oxidation of DA is also investigated by DPVs as shown in Figure 3(e). It was reported that, under the optimum condition, the modified electrode showed good selectivity, excellent linear relation from 0.1 to 10 μM for DA, and high sensitivity with a detection limit of 0.03 μM for DA from their mixture solution.

On the other hand, recently a novel composite consisting of poly[iron (II) tetraphenylporphyrin] (PFeTPP) and poly(sodium-p-styre-nesulfonate) (PSS) modified graphene (Gr), denoted as PFeTPP/PSS-Gr, was developed by Zhang et al. [72]. It was demonstrated that the fabricated composite exhibits superior electrocatalytic activity towards the oxidation of DA. Schematic representation of the procedure for the preparation of PFeTPP/PSS-Gr is shown in Figure 4(a).

Clear lattice fringes as shown by HRTEM image in Figure 4(b) reveal good crystallinity of the PFeTPP nanocrystals. They also investigated the electrochemical behavior of a mixture containing 500 lM AA, 30 lM UA, and DA with different concentrations at the PFeTPP/PSS-Gr modified electrode by DPV, and the results are presented in Figure 4(c). It was revealed that the favorable electrostatic attraction and π-π stacking between positively charged DA and negatively charged PFeTPP/PSS-Gr can enhance the interactions of DA molecules to the electrode surface and accelerate the electron transfer [72].

In another work, a sensitive and selective chemiluminescence sensor for dopamine measurement was developed by Duan et al. with silanized magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer (Si-MG-MIP) that was prepared by encapsulating inorganic magnetic particle with organic polymer [83]. The Si-MG-MIP exhibited excellent merits and had shown high selectivity and sensitivity for on-site measurement of DA. Novel poly(ionic liquids) functionalized polypyrrole/graphene oxide nanosheets (PILs/PPy/GO) were prepared on GCE, which was reported to show excellent electrochemical catalytic activity, good steady, and sensitivity towards DA sensing [67]. It was revealed that the existence of PILs effectively improved the transmission mode of electrons and resulted in the different electrocatalytic performance towards the oxidation of DA and AA. Wang et al. have developed an electrochemical sensor capable of sensitive and selective detection of DA using a nanocomposite composed of conducting polymer poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) doped with GO [86]. Their prepared GO doped PEDOT (PEDOT/GO) nanocomposite, which later on was reduced electrochemically, was reported to detect DA in a wide linear range from 0.1 to 175 μM, with a detection limit of 39 nM.

5. Concluding Remarks

The use of graphene modified electrode in electrochemical biosensors faces explosive growth owing to their sensitive surfaces state and other many excellent characteristics of graphene. In this review, the entire outline of recent advances in dopamine sensing by suing graphene-based electrochemical biosensors is presented and discussed (Scheme 1). The great significance of sensitive and selective simultaneous detection of dopamine and its interference electroactive species eliminates the need for new and miniaturized device fabrication. To improve the hybrids electronic and thermal conductivity, the combination of metallic composite materials with GO can be a promising candidate. The recent investigations suggest that graphene oxide-metal nanocomposites were superior in terms of peak current density, linear range, and limit of detection for dopamine sensors. On the other hand, it was observed that GO-polymer modified electrode act as a good steady and sensitive material that effectively improved the transmission mode of electrons and resulted in the different electrocatalytic performance towards the oxidation of DA.

Another area that deserves expanded attention is the interaction of graphene oxide with biological samples and little to the live cells. More biological systems and related ambient conditions of using graphene in different sensing applications need to be addressed. Above all, the graphene-based modified electrode could be an extremely promising candidate applicable for a wide range of biosensing applications. However, further studies of sensing mechanism along with rich information on intermolecular interaction will accelerate development of the advanced neurotransmitter sensors in the near future.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Bangladesh, as a “Special Allocation for Science and Technology” Program (bo. 39.00.0000.09.02.069.16-17/10) is greatly acknowledged.

References

  1. G. She, X. Huang, L. Jin, X. Qi, L. Mu, and W. Shi, “SnO2 nanoparticle-coated ZnO nanotube arrays for high-performance electrochemical sensors,” Small, vol. 10, no. 22, pp. 4685–4692, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. W. Sun, X. Wang, Y. Wang et al., “Application of graphene–SnO2 nanocomposite modified electrode for the sensitive electrochemical detection of dopamine,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 87, pp. 317–322, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. Zhang, G.-D. Jin, D. Chen, and X.-Y. Hu, “Simultaneous electrochemical determination of dopamine, ascorbic acid and uric acid using poly(acid chrome blue K) modified glassy carbon electrode,” Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 174–181, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. X. Zheng, Y. Guo, J. Zheng, X. Zhou, Q. Li, and R. Lin, “Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid using poly(l-leucine)/DNA composite film modified electrode,” Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical, vol. 213, pp. 188–194, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. R. Ali, Y. Ma, R. R. Parajuli, Y. Balogun, W. Y.-C. Lai, and H. He, “A nonoxidative sensor based on a self-doped polyaniline/carbon nanotube composite for sensitive and selective detection of the neurotransmitter dopamine,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 2583–2587, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. W. M. Caudle, R. E. Colebrooke, P. C. Emson, and G. W. Miller, “Altered vesicular dopamine storage in Parkinson's disease: a premature demise,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 303–308, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Z. Guo, M.-L. Seol, M.-S. Kim et al., “Sensitive and selective electrochemical detection of dopamine using an electrode modified with carboxylated carbonaceous spheres,” Analyst, vol. 138, no. 9, pp. 2683–2690, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. V. Hefco, K. Yamada, A. Hefco, L. Hritcu, A. Tiron, and T. Nabeshima, “Role of the mesotelencephalic dopamine system in learning and memory processes in the rat,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 475, no. 1–3, pp. 55–60, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. Obata, “Dopamine efflux by MPTP and hydroxyl radical generation,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 109, no. 9, pp. 1159–1180, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. B. J. Venton and R. M. Wightman, “Psychoanalytical electrochemistry: dopamine and behavior,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 75, no. 19, pp. 414 A–421 A, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. V. Carrera, E. Sabater, E. Vilanova, and M. A. Sogorb, “A simple and rapid HPLC-MS method for the simultaneous determination of epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine: application to the secretion of bovine chromaffin cell cultures,” Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences, vol. 847, no. 2, pp. 88–94, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. E. Caussé, A. Pradelles, B. Dirat, A. Negre-Salvayre, R. Salvayre, and F. Couderc, “Simultaneous determination of allantoin, hypoxanthine, xanthine, and uric acid in serum/plasma by CE,” Electrophoresis, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 381–387, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Kumbhat, D. R. Shankaran, S. J. Kim, K. V. Gobi, V. Joshi, and N. Miura, “Surface plasmon resonance biosensor for dopamine using D3 dopamine receptor as a biorecognition molecule,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 421–427, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. Muzzi, E. Bertocci, L. Terzuoli et al., “Simultaneous determination of serum concentrations of levodopa, dopamine, 3-O-methyldopa and α-methyldopa by HPLC,” Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 253–258, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Noroozifar, M. Khorasani-Motlagh, R. Akbari, and M. Bemanadi Parizi, “Simultaneous and sensitive determination of a quaternary mixture of AA, DA, UA and Trp using a modified GCE by iron ion-doped natrolite zeolite-multiwall carbon nanotube,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 56–63, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. T. Thomas, R. J. Mascarenhas, P. Martis, Z. Mekhalif, and B. E. K. Swamy, “Multi-walled carbon nanotube modified carbon paste electrode as an electrochemical sensor for the determination of epinephrine in the presence of ascorbic acid and uric acid,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 3294–3302, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. Wang, J. Du, H. Wang et al., “A facile electrochemical sensor based on reduced graphene oxide and Au nanoplates modified glassy carbon electrode for simultaneous detection of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 204, pp. 302–309, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. Wang, Q. Wang, D. Sun, X. Chen, and Y. Sun, “Immunogenic alteration in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 302–309, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Y. Zhang, Z. Xia, H. Liu, M. Yang, L. Lin, and Q. Li, “Hemin-graphene oxide-pristine carbon nanotubes complexes with intrinsic peroxidase-like activity for the detection of H2O2 and simultaneous determination for Trp, AA, DA, and UA,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 188, pp. 496–501, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. P. Kalimuthu and S. A. John, “Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine, uric acid and xanthine using a nanostructured polymer film modified electrode,” Talanta, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 1686–1691, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. D. Wu, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, P. Wang, Q. Wei, and B. Du, “Sensitive electrochemical sensor for simultaneous determination of dopamine, ascorbic acid, and uric acid enhanced by amino-group functionalized mesoporous Fe3O4@Graphene sheets,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 116, pp. 244–249, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. T.-Q. Xu, Q.-L. Zhang, J.-N. Zheng et al., “Simultaneous determination of dopamine and uric acid in the presence of ascorbic acid using Pt nanoparticles supported on reduced graphene oxide,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 115, pp. 109–115, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. B. Zhang, D. Huang, X. Xu et al., “Simultaneous electrochemical determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid with helical carbon nanotubes,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 91, pp. 261–266, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. Bagri, C. Mattevi, M. Acik, Y. J. Chabal, M. Chhowalla, and V. B. Shenoy, “Structural evolution during the reduction of chemically derived graphene oxide,” Nature Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 581–587, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Z. Bo, X. Shuai, S. Mao et al., “Green preparation of reduced graphene oxide for sensing and energy storage applications,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, article 4684, 8 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. W. Chen and L. Yan, “Preparation of graphene by a low-temperature thermal reduction at atmosphere pressure,” Nanoscale, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 559–563, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C. H. Lui, L. Liu, K. F. Mak, G. W. Flynn, and T. F. Heinz, “Ultraflat graphene,” Nature, vol. 462, no. 7271, pp. 339–341, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. T. Takami, T. Ito, and T. Ogino, “Self-assembly of a monolayer graphene oxide film based on surface modification of substrates and its vapor-phase reduction,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 118, no. 17, pp. 9009–9017, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. W. Cai, T. Lai, H. Du, and J. Ye, “Electrochemical determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid based on an exfoliated graphite paper electrode: a high performance flexible sensor,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 193, pp. 492–500, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y. Yang, A. M. Asiri, Z. Tang, D. Du, and Y. Lin, “Graphene based materials for biomedical applications,” Materials Today, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 365–373, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Y.-R. Kim, S. Bong, Y.-J. Kang et al., “Electrochemical detection of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid using graphene modified electrodes,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2366–2369, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S.-J. Li, J.-Z. He, M.-J. Zhang et al., “Electrochemical detection of dopamine using water-soluble sulfonated graphene,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 102, pp. 58–65, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. Han, T. Han, C. Shan, A. Ivaska, and L. Niu, “Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid with chitosan-graphene modified electrode,” Electroanalysis, vol. 22, no. 17-18, pp. 2001–2008, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. L. Yang, D. Liu, J. Huang, and T. You, “Simultaneous determination of dopamine, ascorbic acid and uric acid at electrochemically reduced graphene oxide modified electrode,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 193, pp. 166–172, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, “The rise of graphene,” Nature Materials, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 183–191, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J.-H. Chen, C. Jang, S. Xiao, M. Ishigami, and M. S. Fuhrer, “Intrinsic and extrinsic performance limits of graphene devices on SiO2,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 206–209, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. L. Tang, Y. Wang, Y. Li, H. Feng, J. Lu, and J. Li, “Preparation, structure, and electrochemical properties of reduced graphene sheet films,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 19, no. 17, pp. 2782–2789, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. Zhou, Y. Zhai, and S. Dong, “Electrochemical sensing and biosensing platform based on chemically reduced graphene oxide,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 81, no. 14, pp. 5603–5613, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. W.-J. Lin, C.-S. Liao, J.-H. Jhang, and Y.-C. Tsai, “Graphene modified basal and edge plane pyrolytic graphite electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of hydrogen peroxide and β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 2153–2156, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. Yang, D. Guo, L. Su et al., “A facile method for preparation of graphene film electrodes with tailor-made dimensions with Vaseline as the insulating binder,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1912–1915, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. E. Fischer, Y. Show, and G. M. Swain, “Electrochemical performance of diamond thin-film electrodes from different commercial sources,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 76, no. 9, pp. 2553–2560, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. R. L. McCreery, “Advanced carbon electrode materials for molecular electrochemistry,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 108, no. 7, pp. 2646–2687, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. J. Gooding, “Nanostructuring electrodes with carbon nanotubes: a review on electrochemistry and applications for sensing,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 50, no. 15, pp. 3049–3060, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. Y. Shao, J. Wang, H. Wu, J. Liu, I. A. Aksay, and Y. Lin, “Graphene based electrochemical sensors and biosensors: a review,” Electroanalysis, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1027–1036, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. W. Choi, I. Lahiri, R. Seelaboyina, and Y. S. Kang, “Synthesis of graphene and its applications: a review,” Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 52–71, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. Pumera, “Electrochemistry of graphene: new horizons for sensing and energy storage,” The Chemical Record, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 211–223, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. E. Dragicevic, J. Schiemann, and B. Liss, “Dopamine midbrain neurons in health and Parkinson's disease: emerging roles of voltage-gated calcium channels and ATP-sensitive potassium channels,” Neuroscience, vol. 284, pp. 798–814, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. Liu, L. Yuan, and X. Dong, “Recent advances in analytical techniques for the determination of dopamine,” International Journal of Chemical Studies, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 39–45, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  49. T. Pradhan, H. S. Jung, J. H. Jang, T. W. Kim, C. Kang, and J. S. Kim, “Chemical sensing of neurotransmitters,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 43, no. 13, pp. 4684–4713, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. H. Beitollahi, M. Hamzavi, M. Torkzadeh-Mahani, M. Shanesaz, and H. K. Maleh, “A novel strategy for simultaneous determination of dopamine and uric acid using a carbon paste electrode modified with CdTe quantum dots,” Electroanalysis, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 524–533, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. J. Giner-Casares, M. Henriksen-Lacey, M. Coronado-Puchau, and L. M. Liz-Marzán, “Inorganic nanoparticles for biomedicine: where materials scientists meet medical research,” Materials Today, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. X. Gu, G. Jiang, G. Jiang et al., “Detection of dopamine on a mercapto-terminated hexanuclear Fe(III) cluster modified gold electrode,” Talanta, vol. 137, pp. 189–196, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. Z. Guo, G. Huang, J. Li, Z. Wang, and X. Xu, “Graphene oxide-Ag/poly-l-lysine modified glassy carbon electrode as an electrochemical sensor for the determination of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 759, pp. 113–121, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. C. Wang, X. Zou, X. Zhao, Q. Wang, J. Tan, and R. Yuan, “Cu-nanoparticles incorporated overoxidized-poly(3-amino-5-mercapto-1,2,4-triazole) film modified electrode for the simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine, uric acid and tryptophan,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 741, pp. 36–41, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. Y. Huang, Y.-E. Miao, S. Ji, W. W. Tjiu, and T. Liu, “Electrospun carbon nanofibers decorated with Ag-Pt bimetallic nanoparticles for selective detection of dopamine,” ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, vol. 6, no. 15, pp. 12449–12456, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. B. Habibi and M. H. Pournaghi-Azar, “Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid by use of a MWCNT modified carbon-ceramic electrode and differential pulse voltammetry,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 55, no. 19, pp. 5492–5498, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. C. Xiao, X. Chu, Y. Yang, X. Li, X. Zhang, and J. Chen, “Hollow nitrogen-doped carbon microspheres pyrolyzed from self-polymerized dopamine and its application in simultaneous electrochemical determination of uric acid, ascorbic acid and dopamine,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 2934–2939, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. Z. Dursun and B. Gelmez, “Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid at pt nanoparticles decorated multiwall carbon nanotubes modified GCE,” Electroanalysis, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1106–1114, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. D. Zheng, J. Ye, L. Zhou, Y. Zhang, and C. Yu, “Simultaneous determination of dopamine, ascorbic acid and uric acid on ordered mesoporous carbon/Nafion composite film,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 625, no. 1, pp. 82–87, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. B. J. Plowman, M. Mahajan, A. P. O'Mullane, and S. K. Bhargava, “Electrochemical detection of dopamine and cytochrome c at a nanostructured gold electrode,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 55, no. 28, pp. 8953–8959, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. T.-H. Tsai, Y.-C. Huang, S.-M. Chen, M. A. Ali, and F. M. A. Alhemaid, “Fabrication of multifunctional biosensor for the determination of hydrogen peroxide, dopamine and uric acid,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 6456–6468, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  62. D. Sun, X. Xie, and H. Zhang, “Surface effects of mesoporous silica modified electrode and application in electrochemical detection of dopamine,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 88–92, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. K. Fooladsaz, M. Negahdary, G. Rahimi et al., “Dopamine determination with a biosensor based on catalase and modified carbon paste electrode with Zinc oxide nanoparticles,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 9892–9908, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  64. W. Cai, J. Lai, T. Lai, H. Xie, and J. Ye, “Controlled functionalization of flexible graphene fibers for the simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 224, pp. 225–232, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. P. T. Do, P. Q. Do, H. B. Nguyen et al., “A highly sensitive electrode modified with graphene, gold nanoparticles, and molecularly imprinted over-oxidized polypyrrole for electrochemical determination of dopamine,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, vol. 198, pp. 307–312, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. Q. Lian, A. Luo, Z. An et al., “Au nanoparticles on tryptophan-functionalized graphene for sensitive detection of dopamine,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 349, pp. 184–189, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. H. Mao, J. Liang, H. Zhang et al., “Poly(ionic liquids) functionalized polypyrrole/graphene oxide nanosheets for electrochemical sensor to detect dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 70, pp. 289–298, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. R. Nurzulaikha, H. N. Lim, I. Harrison et al., “Graphene/SnO2 nanocomposite-modified electrode for electrochemical detection of dopamine,” Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research, vol. 5, pp. 42–49, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. Y. J. Yang and W. Li, “CTAB functionalized graphene oxide/multiwalled carbon nanotube composite modified electrode for the simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine, uric acid and nitrite,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 56, pp. 300–306, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. F. Ye, C. Feng, J. Jiang, and S. Han, “Simultaneous determination of dopamine, uric acid and nitrite using carboxylated graphene oxide/lanthanum modified electrode,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 182, pp. 935–945, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. B. Yu, D. Kuang, S. Liu, C. Liu, and T. Zhang, “Template-assisted self-assembly method to prepare three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide for dopamine sensing,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 205, pp. 120–126, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. B. Zhang, Y. Wang, M. Li, L. Cui, and X. He, “Graphene-supported poly[iron (II) tetraphenylporphyrin] hybrid fabricated by a solvothermally assisted ππ assembly method and its application for the detection of dopamine,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 743, pp. 10–17, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. W. Zhang, J. Zheng, J. Shi et al., “Nafion covered core-shell structured Fe3O4@graphene nanospheres modified electrode for highly selective detection of dopamine,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 853, no. 1, pp. 285–290, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. X. Zhou, P. Ma, A. Wang et al., “Dopamine fluorescent sensors based on polypyrrole/graphene quantum dots core/shell hybrids,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 64, pp. 404–410, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. A. A. Abdelwahab and Y.-B. Shim, “Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine, uric acid and folic acid based on activated graphene/MWCNT nanocomposite loaded Au nanoclusters,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 221, pp. 659–665, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. S. Hu, Q. Huang, Y. Lin et al., “Reduced graphene oxide-carbon dots composite as an enhanced material for electrochemical determination of dopamine,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 130, pp. 805–809, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. Y. Liu, P. She, J. Gong et al., “A novel sensor based on electrodeposited Au–Pt bimetallic nano-clusters decorated on graphene oxide (GO)–electrochemically reduced GO for sensitive detection of dopamine and uric acid,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 221, pp. 1542–1553, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. H. Zhang, Q. Huang, Y. Huang et al., “Graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets doped graphene oxide for electrochemical simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 142, pp. 125–131, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. J. Zhao, L. Zhao, C. Lan, and S. Zhao, “Graphene quantum dots as effective probes for label-free fluorescence detection of dopamine,” Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical, vol. 223, pp. 246–251, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. L. Zhao, H. Li, S. Gao et al., “MgO nanobelt-modified graphene-tantalum wire electrode for the simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 168, pp. 191–198, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. H. Teymourian, A. Salimi, and S. Khezrian, “Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles/reduced graphene oxide nanosheets as a novel electrochemical and bioeletrochemical sensing platform,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 49, pp. 1–8, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. Y. Yan, Q. Liu, X. Du, J. Qian, H. Mao, and K. Wang, “Visible light photoelectrochemical sensor for ultrasensitive determination of dopamine based on synergistic effect of graphene quantum dots and TiO2 nanoparticles,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 853, no. 1, pp. 258–264, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. H. Duan, L. Li, X. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Li, and C. Luo, “A sensitive and selective chemiluminescence sensor for the determination of dopamine based on silanized magnetic graphene oxide-molecularly imprinted polymer,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 139, pp. 374–379, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. Z. Guo, G.-Q. Huang, J. Li, Z.-Y. Wang, and X.-F. Xu, “Graphene oxide-Ag/poly-l-lysine modified glassy carbon electrode as an electrochemical sensor for the determination of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 759, pp. 113–121, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. L. Fritea, A. Le Goff, J.-L. Putaux et al., “Design of a reduced-graphene-oxide composite electrode from an electropolymerizable graphene aqueous dispersion using a cyclodextrin-pyrrole monomer. Application to dopamine biosensing,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 178, pp. 108–112, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. W. Wang, G. Xu, X. T. Cui, G. Sheng, and X. Luo, “Enhanced catalytic and dopamine sensing properties of electrochemically reduced conducting polymer nanocomposite doped with pure graphene oxide,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 58, pp. 153–156, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. Y. J. Yang, “One step electrosynthesis of polyacrylamide crosslinked by reduced graphene oxide and its application in the simultaneous determination of dopamine and uric acid,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 146, pp. 23–29, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 M. Z. H. Khan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views4277
Downloads1572
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.