Thermal Conductivity and Photothermal Conversion Performance of Ethylene Glycol-Based Nanofluids Containing Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes

Tam, Nguyen Trong; Van Trinh, Pham; Anh, Nguyen Ngoc; Hong, Nguyen Tuan; Hong, Phan Ngoc; Minh, Phan Ngoc; Thang, Bui Hung

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2750168

Journal of Nanomaterials

On this page

Abstract Introduction Results and Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 | Article ID 2750168 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2750168

Thermal Conductivity and Photothermal Conversion Performance of Ethylene Glycol-Based Nanofluids Containing Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes

Nguyen Trong Tam,^1,2,3Pham Van Trinh ,¹Nguyen Ngoc Anh,¹Nguyen Tuan Hong,⁴Phan Ngoc Hong,^2,4Phan Ngoc Minh,^1,2,4and Bui Hung Thang¹

Academic Editor: Giuseppe Compagnini

Received15 May 2018

Revised19 Sept 2018

Accepted23 Sept 2018

Published22 Nov 2018

Abstract

In this study, the successful hydroxyl functionalization of carbon nanotubes (MWCNT-OH) was prepared by chemical treatments and characterized by Raman and FTIR spectra. MWCNT-OH was successfully dispersed into ethylene glycol (EG) with the Tween-80 surfactant by an ultrasonication method to prepare nanofluids. Thermal conductivity of nanofluid was investigated, and a maximum thermal conductivity enhancement about 24% at 50°C was obtained with nanofluid containing 0.64 vol.% MWCNT concentration. The photothermal conversion performance of nanofluid was also investigated by measuring the change of the temperature under lighting from a solar simulator. The measurement results showed that the highest photothermal conversion was obtained about 4.2% after a 30 min lighting with nanofluid containing 0.48 vol.% CNT concentration compared to ethylene glycol. These obtained results have propose a potential application of CNTs in nanofluids for solar absorption.

1. Introduction

The demands for new clean energy sources like wind energy and solar energy are very high to replace the traditional energy sources. Many organizations and researchers around the world have been focusing on this problem and trying to find the best solution for the energy security in the future. Solar energy conversion is widely used to generate heat and produce electricity, in which heat generation is a method that does not require microelectronic technology and thus possibly proposes an energy solution with a reasonable price compared to others [1–5]. The problem here is the working fluid with low thermal conductivity in solar collectors not good enough to capture incident solar radiations and convert it into thermal energy. Recently, a new class of fluids called nanofluid including nanomaterials like nanoparticles, nanotubes, nanowires, nanorods, and nanosheet in base fluids improved the thermophysical properties like thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity, viscosity, and convective heat transfer coefficients compared to the traditional base fluids such as water and ethylene glycol [5–7]. Besides, the nanofluids possibly propose a higher surface area for solar energy and heat absorption processes. In addition, the included nanomaterials with selective absorption spectrum possibility and thus nanofluids combined different materials can absorb sunlight in a wide range from ultraviolet to infrared [8, 9].

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs), a well-known material with many excellent properties such as high thermal conductivity and high electrical conductivity, have been considered an ideal nanoadditive material for nanofluid applications [10–15]. Nanofluids containing CNTs have been investigated and developed by many researchers and manufacturers and expressed as a great candidate for many potential applications such as heat transfer, thermal dissipation, and solar energy absorption. The critical technical problem with CNT nanofluid is how to uniform disperse CNTs in base fluids like water and ethylene glycol to obtain not only good stability but also high performance [16, 17].

The two main methods including noncovalent functionalization and covalent functionalization were usually used to obtain the uniform dispersion and high stability of CNT-based nanofluids [18]. Noncovalent functionalization usually uses surfactants such as sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Tween, and chitosan to improve the wettability between CNTs and based fluids. The earlier studies demonstrated the efficacy of noncovalent functionalization in preparing the high stability of CNT nanofluids [18]. Unlike, the covalent functionalization usually use functional groups including COOH, OH, and NH2 to eliminate the van der Waals forces among CNTs via hydrogen bonding between functional groups and base fluids and thus obtain high-stability nanofluids. Among the functional groups, the hydroxyl (OH) group exhibited a higher interaction energy compared to others (CNT-OH (116 kcal mol⁻¹) > CNT-COOH (80 kcal mol⁻¹) > CNT=O (70 kcal mol⁻¹) > CNT=C=O (−36 kcal mol⁻¹)) [19]. Therefore, incorporating CNT-OH with organic compounds including polymers and solvents could significantly improve all of the mechanical properties [20] and electrical and thermal properties [21].

Thus, the purpose of this work is to prepare and investigate for the first time EG-based nanofluids containing MWCNT that has good stability, high thermal conductivity, and high photothermal conversion performance by the combination of the surface modification of CNT with the hydroxyl functional group and Tween-80 surfactant.

2. Experimental Procedure

Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) synthesized by a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technique were used for preparing the nanofluids. Firstly, MWCNTs were treated with the mixture of H₂SO₄ and HNO₃ with a volume ratio of 3 : 1 at 70°C for 5 h. After that, as-received solution was cleaned by distilled water to obtain MWCNT-COOH. The obtained MWCNT-COOH was then suspended in SOCl₂ solution to obtain MWCNT-COCl under continuous stirring for 6 h at 60°C. The obtained solution was filtered, washed with THF and distilled water, and then mixed with EG for 8 h at 120°C to obtain the MWCNT-OH. Finally, the MWCNT-OH was dispersed in EG with 1 vol.% Tween-80 surfactant to prepare MWCNT-EG nanofluids by ultrasonication. The prepared nanofluids are noted as NF1, NF2, and NF3 corresponding to the different CNT concentrations of 0.32, 0.48, and 0.64 vol.%, respectively.

The morphology and microstructure of MWCNTs were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Hitachi S4800), transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, Jeon-JEM 2100), Raman spectroscopy (iHR550 Jobin-Yvon spectrometer), and FTIR spectroscopy (Jasco FT/IR-4600). Thermal conductivity () of nanofluids was measured in range from 30°C to 50°C with HTL-04 equipment supplied by Eternal Engineering Equipment Ltd., India. The HTL-04 apparatus based on the principle of a guarded hot plate (GHP) method has a maximum uncertainty of ±2%. The photothermal conversion property of nanofluid was investigated by measuring directly the temperature of the MWCNT/EG nanofluid during lighting from a solar simulator. In our experiment, a xenon arc lamp was used as the lighting source because it can be filtered to have an emission spectrum closely matching that of terrestrial sunlight. The detail of the experimental setup for photothermal conversion measurement was shown in Figure 1.

3. Results and Discussion

Typical SEM and TEM images of MWCNTs are shown in Figure 2. It reveals that the MWCNTs have a uniform size with an average length of 10 μm (Figure 2(a)). The detail of diameter distribution of MWCNTs was measured for about 150 CNTs as shown in Figure 2(b). The average outer diameter is equal to 20 nm. HRTEM was performed to investigate the effect of the hydroxyl functionalization process on the structure of MWCNTs. As shown in Figure 2(c), as-received MWCNTs have a smooth surface with a d-spacing measured by ImageJ to be 0.34 nm similar to that of a graphite. In the case of MWCNT-OH, some structural defects were observed on the surface of MWCNT as etched positions and amorphous clusters (Figure 2(d)). The structural defects may be due to the effect of regents during the chemical functionalization process [18, 22]. d-spacing of MWCNT-OH measured to be 0.38 nm is larger than that of as-received MWCNTs. The obtained result implies that the presence of OH groups attached to the surface caused an increase in the d-spacing of MWCNTs. From the data, we can calculate the empirical shape factor () of MWCNTs as where is the sphericity of MWCNT and is defined as where and are the volume and the surface area of MWCNTs and are expressed as follows: with and for the radii and length of MWCNT; the empirical shape factor is determined to be approximately about 14.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 3(a) shows the Raman spectra of as-received MWCNT and MWCNT-OH. Typical bands at 1348 cm⁻¹ and 1590 cm⁻¹ are defined as a defect band (D) and a graphitic band (G), respectively. As can be seen, the broadening of the G band of MWCNT-OH indicates a reduction in the resonance-induced vibration extinction time [23]. This could imply an increase in structural defects and/or a shortening of the CNT after the hydroxyl functionalization process. The G band positions upshift to a larger wavenumber with MWCNT-OH. This could be due to the increase in the amorphous carbon content resulting from a convolution between the original G band (approx. 1580 cm⁻¹) and the D’ band (approx. 1620 cm⁻¹). In addition, according to Bokobza and Zhang, they reported that the upshift of the G band is due to the less intertube interactions between MWCNT-OH meaning that the dispersion state of MWCNT-OH is improved [24]. The relative intensity ratio of D to G (I_D/I_G) also is an important parameter that needs to be considered for carbon nanomaterials. In this work, the I_D/I_G was determined to be 0.89 and 1.13 corresponding to as-received MWCNTs and MWCNT-OH, respectively. The increase in the I_D/I_G ratio of MWCNT-OH compared to that of as-received MWCNTs indicated that the chemical treatment for OH attachment strongly affected the CNT structure by inducing some defect points [25]. The Raman results are in good agreement with the HRTEM analysis as discussed earlier.

(a)

(b)

Figure 3(b) shows the FTIR spectra of MWCNTs and MWCNTs functionalized with OH groups. There are no peaks observed from FTIR spectra of as-received MWCNTs. It means that no functional groups were attached on the surface of MWCNT after the synthesis process. For MWCNT-OH, several peaks at 1735, 1620, 1230, and 1080 cm⁻¹ were observed and can be ascribed to stretching vibrations of C=O, C=C, C-OH, and C-O bonds, respectively [18, 26]. The obtained results confirmed that MWCNT-OH was successfully prepared by multistep chemical treatments.

The aggregate size distribution of the nanofluids containing different CNT concentrations is shown in Figure 4. As can be seen in Figure 4, the peak of aggregate size for nanofluids increased as CNT concentrations increase. The aggregated size of the nanofluid was measured to be 110 nm, 125 nm, and 150 nm corresponding to nanofluids NF1, NF2, and NF3, respectively. This result indicated that CNTs tend to aggregate together as the concentration in the solution increases. The zeta potential of the nanofluid was measured to be −65 mV, −52.9 mV, and− 47.2 mV for nanofluids NF1, NF2, and NF3, respectively. It is well known that a nanofluid has good stability if it has an absolute zeta potential value above 30 mV [27, 28]. As a result, the prepared EG-based nanofluids containing MWCNT-OH and Tween-80 surfactant have good stability.

Figure 5 shows the thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluids with different MWCNT concentrations as a function of different temperatures. As can be seen, the thermal conductivity of nanofluids increases with the increase in MWCNT concentration. This may result from the decrease in the mean free path or thermal transport distance among MWCNTs as the volume fraction increases. According to Baby and Sundara, the decrease in thermal transport distance leads to the increase in the frequency of lattice vibration and thus the thermal conductivity of nanofluids will be improved [29]. The effect of the temperature on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids was also investigated. The experimental results show that the thermal conductivity of nanofluids increases with higher temperatures. By using linear fitting, we can determine the improvement rate of the nanofluid at different temperatures via a slope of the fitting function. As shown in Figure 5, the slopes of thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluids were estimated to be 0.352, 0.535, and 0.788 corresponding to nanofluids NF1, NF2, and NF3, respectively. The obtained results demonstrated that the nanofluid with higher MWCNT concentrations shows a higher improvement rate at all measured temperatures. For example, at 30°C, the thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluid NF3 (8.5%) is higher than that of nanofluid NF1 (4.4%) and nanofluid NF2 (6.4%). With the highest measured temperature of 50°C, the thermal conductivity enhancement value also keeps the same trend but the enhancement value is much different with 11.4% for nanofluid NF1, 17.7% for nanofluid NF2, and 24.2% for nanofluid NF3. This result could be due to the contribution of Brownian motion that plays as a key mechanism of thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluids [30]. Besides, increasing temperature will lead to a decrease in the formation of nanoadditive clusters in nanofluid due to the reduction of the nanoadditive surface energy and improve the Brownian motion by the reduction of viscosity [31].

Several theoretical models have been proposed to evaluate the thermal conductivity of nanofluids as listed in Table 1 [32–37]. Using the reported values ( [38], , and ) and the calculated values (, , , and ) for the theoretical models, the fitting results were plotted and are shown in Figure 6. The estimated data from the Maxwell model and Patel model is much lower or higher than the experimental data. The reason for this could be due to the fact that these models only take into account the influence of , , and CNT concentration and do not take the CNT size into consideration. The Hamilton–Crosser (H-C) model shows a better fitting data than other models. This could be due to the fact that the H-C model considers not only the effect of the thermal conductivity and concentration but also the CNT size with an empirical shape factor. However, in fact, the thermal conductivity of nanofluid does not depend only on the parameters such as thermal conductivity and concentration of nanoadditives. Some parameters like thermal conductivity and thermal boundary resistance (TBR) of the interfacial layer between CNT and base fluid also need to be considered. The problem here is the difficulty in determining the mentioned parameters by the experimental study. Nan et al. have proposed a model that considered the effect of the TBR on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids [36]. By using the TBR fitting of Nan et al.’s model and the experimental data in our study, the TBR of MWCNTs and EG-based fluid was determined to be 150 × 10⁻⁸ m²K W⁻¹. The interfacial thermal conductivity () between MWCNT and EG was also calculated to be 1.65 Wm⁻¹ K⁻¹ by using Murshed et al.’s model [37]. The calculated value is lower, which is why the thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluids containing MWCNT-COOH and Tween-80 surfactant is a bit lower compared to other reports [18, 39, 40]. Further studies will be conducted in the near future to improve in order to enhance the thermal conductivity of nanofluids.

The photothermal conversion performance of MWCNT/EG nanofluids is largely dependent on the temperature variations of nanofluids as a function of lighting time. The effects of nanofluid concentration on the temperature variations of nanofluids at the same lighting time are presented in Figure 7. It is clear that a profound improvement in the photothermal conversion property of EG was achieved after the addition of MWCNTs. The nanofluid temperature increased more quickly than that of EG within the lighting time range of 30 min. For example, the highest temperature of nanofluids NF2 and NF3, at the terminal time of 30 min, was increased by about 4.2% as compared with that of EG. However, the photothermal conversion capability of nanofluid NF2 seems better than that of nanofluid NF3. The detail of photothermal conversion enhancement of nanofluids was shown in Figure 8. As can be seen, nanofluid NF1 reached the stable regime about 2.1% after 1500 s lighting that is lower than those of nanofluid NF2 and nanofluid NF3. This is attributed to the lower thermal conductivity as discussed in the above section. Nanofluid NF2 and nanofluid NF3 go to the stable point to be 4.2%. However, nanofluid NF2 reaches the stable regime after 750 s while nanofluid NF3 needs about 1750 s to reach the stable regime that even has higher thermal conductivity. This result could be due to the fact that nanofluid NF2 with higher CNT concentration causes a larger infrared emissivity and hence an increase in heat loss. The excessive concentration can reinforce the volumetric solar energy absorption at a relatively small nanofluid height from the upper surface, and thus more sunlight can be absorbed in the upper part. As a result, the corresponding temperature of aqueous suspension at a larger depth would even be lower than that at a smaller concentration. The same trend has also been reported by Qu and coworkers in which they investigated the effect of concentration variation of the MWCNT–H₂O nanofluid on the photothermal conversion [13].

4. Conclusions

The successful hydroxyl functionalization of carbon nanotubes was proven by Raman and FTIR spectral measurements. High-stability EG-based nanofluids containing MWCNT-OH were prepared by an ultrasonication method with the Tween-80 surfactant. The nanofluid containing 0.64 vol.% MWCNT concentration showed a maximum thermal conductivity enhancement about 24% at 50°C. The measurement results showed that the lighting absorption efficiency of the nanofluids increases with the optimal concentration of CNTs in nanofluids about 0.48 vol.%. The temperature of MWCNT/EG nanofluid at concentrations of 0.48 vol.% and 0.64 vol.% was increased by about 4.2% after a 30 min lighting compared to that of ethylene glycol. These results have opened the potential application of CNTs in nanofluids for solar absorption.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under project no. 103.99-2015.70. This work is also supported by Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology under project no. VAST.TĐ.QP.03/17-19.

References

P. K. Nagarajan, J. Subramani, S. Suyambazhahan, and R. Sathyamurthy, “Nanofluids for solar collector applications: a review,” Energy Procedia, vol. 61, pp. 2416–2434, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Beerepoot, Technology Roadmap Solar Heating and Cooling, International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 2012.
D. S. Codd, A. Carlson, J. Rees, and A. H. Slocum, “A low cost high flux solar simulator,” Solar Energy, vol. 84, no. 12, pp. 2202–2212, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Kalogirou, “Solar thermal collectors and applications,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 231–295, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Vasiliev, E. Hleb, A. Shnip, and D. Lapotko, “Bubble generation in micro-volumes of ‘nanofluids’,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 52, no. 5-6, pp. 1534–1539, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Jama, T. Singh, S. M. Gamaleldin et al., “Critical review on nanofluids: preparation, characterization, and applications,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2016, Article ID 6717624, 22 pages, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lotfizadeh and T. Matsoukas, “Effect of nanostructure on thermal conductivity of nanofluids,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2015, Article ID 697596, 7 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Yu and H. Xie, “A review on nanofluids: preparation, stability mechanisms, and applications,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2012, Article ID 435873, 17 pages, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Tawfik, “Experimental studies of nanofluid thermal conductivity enhancement and applications: a review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 75, pp. 1239–1253, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Hordy, D. Rabilloud, J. L. Meunier, and S. Coulombe, “A stable carbon nanotube nanofluid for latent heat-driven volumetric absorption solar heating applications,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2015, Article ID 850217, 6 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. H. Thang, P. van Trinh, L. D. Quang, N. T. Huong, P. H. Khoi, and P. N. Minh, “Heat dissipation for the Intel Core i5 processor using multiwalled carbon-nanotube-based ethylene glycol,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 312–316, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. H. Thang, P. V. Trinh, N. V. Chuc, P. H. Khoi, and P. N. Minh, “Heat dissipation for microprocessor using multiwalled carbon nanotubes based liquid,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2013, Article ID 305957, 6 pages, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Qu, M. Tian, X. Han, R. Zhang, and Q. Wang, “Photo-thermal conversion characteristics of MWCNT-H₂O nanofluids for direct solar thermal energy absorption applications,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 124, pp. 486–493, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Shende and S. Ramaprabhu, “Thermo-optical properties of partially unzipped multiwalled carbon nanotubes dispersed nanofluids for direct absorption solar thermal energy systems,” Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, vol. 157, pp. 117–125, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Y. Leong, H. C. Ong, N. H. Amer, M. J. Norazrina, M. S. Risby, and K. Z. Ku Ahmad, “An overview on current application of nanofluids in solar thermal collector and its challenges,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 53, pp. 1092–1105, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Babita, S. K. Sharma, and S. M. Gupta, “Preparation and evaluation of stable nanofluids for heat transfer application: a review,” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, vol. 79, pp. 202–212, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Raja, R. Vijayan, P. Dineshkumar, and M. Venkatesan, “Review on nanofluids characterization, heat transfer characteristics and applications,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 64, pp. 163–173, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. van Trinh, N. N. Anh, N. T. Tam et al., “Influence of defects induced by chemical treatment on the electrical and thermal conductivity of nanofluids containing carboxyl-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes,” RSC Advances, vol. 7, no. 79, pp. 49937–49946, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Felten, C. Bittencourt, J. J. Pireaux, G. van Lier, and J. C. Charlier, “Radio-frequency plasma functionalization of carbon nanotubes surface O₂, NH₃, and CF₄ treatments,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 98, no. 7, article 074308, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Song, H. T. Yang, S. Y. Fu et al., “Effect of carbon nanotubes on the mechanical properties of polypropylene/wood flour composites: reinforcement mechanism,” Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part B, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 907–921, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. L. do Amaral Montanheiro, F. H. Cristóvan, J. P. B. Machado, D. B. Tada, N. Durán, and A. P. Lemes, “Effect of MWCNT functionalization on thermal and electrical properties of PHBV/MWCNT nanocomposites,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 55–65, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. V. Trinh, N. V. Luan, D. D. Phuong et al., “Microstructure, microhardness and thermal expansion of CNT/Al composites prepared by flake powder metallurgy,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 105, pp. 126–137, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. V. Trinh, N. N. Anh, N. T. Hong, P. N. Hong, P. N. Minh, and B. H. Thang, “Experimental study on the thermal conductivity of ethylene glycol-based nanofluid containing Gr-CNT hybrid material,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, vol. 269, pp. 344–353, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Bokobza and J. Zhang, “Raman spectroscopic characterization of multiwall carbon nanotubes and of composites,” Express Polymer Letters, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 601–608, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Ferrari and J. Robertson, “Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon,” Physical Review B, vol. 61, no. 20, pp. 14095–14107, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Kabbani, C. S. Tiwary, P. A. S. Autreto et al., “Ambient solid-state mechano-chemical reactions between functionalized carbon nanotubes,” Nature Communications, vol. 6, no. 1, article 7291, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ghadimi, R. Saidur, and H. S. C. Metselaar, “A review of nanofluid stability properties and characterization in stationary conditions,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 54, no. 17-18, pp. 4051–4068, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ivall, G. Langlois-Rahme, S. Coulombe, and P. Servio, “Quantitative stability analyses of multiwall carbon nanotube nanofluids following water/ice phase change cycling,” Nanotechnology, vol. 28, no. 5, article 055702, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. T. Baby and R. Sundara, “Synthesis and transport properties of metal oxide decorated graphene dispersed nanofluids,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 115, no. 17, pp. 8527–8533, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. H. Chon, K. D. Kihm, S. P. Lee, and S. U. S. Choi, “Empirical correlation finding the role of temperature and particle size for nanofluid (Al₂O₃) thermal conductivity enhancement,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 87, no. 15, article 153107, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Yu-Hua, Q. Wei, and F. Jian-Chao, “Temperature dependence of thermal conductivity of nanofluids,” Chinese physics letters, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 3319–3322, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, Clarendon, 1973.
R. L. Hamilton and O. K. Crosser, “Thermal conductivity of heterogeneous two-component systems,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 187–191, 1962.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. E. Patel, K. B. Anoop, T. Sundararajan, and S. K. Das, “Model for thermal conductivity of CNT-nanofluids,” Bulletin of Materials Science, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 387–390, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Z. Xue, “Model for thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube-based composites,” Physica B: Condensed Matter, vol. 368, no. 1-4, pp. 302–307, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. W. Nan, R. Birringer, D. R. Clarke, and H. Gleiter, “Effective thermal conductivity of particulate composites with interfacial thermal resistance,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 6692–6699, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. S. Murshed, K. C. Leong, and C. Yang, “Investigations of thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids,” International Journal of Thermal Sciences, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 560–568, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Balandin, “Thermal properties of graphene and nanostructured carbon materials,” Nature Materials, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 569–581, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. van Trinh, N. N. Anh, B. H. Thang et al., “Enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluid-based ethylene glycol containing Cu nanoparticles decorated on a Gr–MWCNT hybrid material,” RSC Advances, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 318–326, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Harish, K. Ishikawa, E. Einarsson et al., “Temperature dependent thermal conductivity increase of aqueous nanofluid with single walled carbon nanotube inclusion,” Materials Express, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 213–223, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2018 Nguyen Trong Tam et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1727

Downloads

962

Citations