Facile Synthesis of Yb3+- and Er3+-Codoped LiGdF4 Colloidal Nanocrystals with High-Quality Upconversion Luminescence

Zi, Lu; Zhang, Dan; De, Gejihu

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3928526

Journal of Nanomaterials

On this page

Abstract Introduction Experimental Results Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 | Article ID 3928526 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3928526

Facile Synthesis of Yb³⁺- and Er³⁺-Codoped LiGdF₄ Colloidal Nanocrystals with High-Quality Upconversion Luminescence

Lu Zi,¹Dan Zhang,¹and Gejihu De^1,2,3

Academic Editor: Hiromasa Nishikiori

Received29 Dec 2018

Revised14 Mar 2019

Accepted14 Apr 2019

Published16 May 2019

Abstract

Herein, we synthesized high-quality colloidal nanocrystals of Yb³⁺/Er³⁺-codoped LiGdF₄ with intense green emission by using a facile route and turning the associated reaction parameters. Moreover, we probed the effects of reaction conditions on nanocrystal properties (crystal structure, morphology, and luminescence) and gained valuable mechanistic insights into nucleation and growth processes. Sample purity was found to depend on LiOH·H₂O concentration, reaction temperature, and time, which allowed us to manipulate sample purity and thus obtain species ranging from mixtures of LiGdF₄:Yb³⁺/Er³⁺ with GdF₃ to pure tetragonal-phase LiGdF₄:Yb³⁺/Er³⁺. Investigation of upconversion luminescence properties and the luminescence lifetime of as-prepared samples revealed that LiGdF₄ is a promising host material for realizing the desired upconversion luminescence.

1. Introduction

Trivalent lanthanide ion- (Ln³⁺-) doped nanocrystals, which can convert infrared radiation to visible luminescence, have attracted much attention in view of their excellent luminescence properties and unique application value [1–9]. The application fields are very wide including solid-state lasers, 3D displays, solar cells, photovoltaics, biological probe and label markers, and multimodal bioimaging [10–16]. Most of these nanocrystals correspond to fluorides, which exhibit several advantages over other halides, such as thermal and environmental stability, high refractive index, high transparency, low-frequency phonons, and lower emission threshold [17–20]. Among fluorides, those based on Gd³⁺ have been intensively researched because of their excellent chemical and optical properties [21–24]. Moreover, the energy gap between the ⁶P_7/2 and the ⁸S_7/2 levels of Gd³⁺ equals 32000 cm⁻¹, which allows Gd³⁺ to be used as an intermediary to promote fluoride energy transfer and thus greatly improve the efficiency of upconversion luminescence [25, 26].

Much research has been performed on the monodisperse, well-shaped, uniform-size, and phase-pure NaGdF₄ nanoparticles in recent decades [27–35]. For instance, Liu and coworkers prepared size-controllable, highly monodisperse, oleate-capped NaGdF₄:Yb,Er nanocrystals that can be used as biological probes for in vivo testing of tiny tumors [36], while Johnson’s group showed that the regulation of reaction time and temperature allows the synthesis of size-tunable and ultrasmall NaGdF₄ nanoparticles (2.5-8.0 nm) [37]. There is no doubt that NaGdF₄ is considered to be an ideal rigid host matrix for upconversion, and its synthesis has therefore become a research hotspot for the majority of scholars. However, LiGdF₄ has been underexplored among the AGdF₄ () hosts because of the difficulty of synthesizing pure tetragonal-phase LiGdF₄ nanocrystals. To the best of our knowledge, LiGdF₄ nanocrystals are mainly prepared using Czochralski, sol-gel, or thermal decomposition methods. For instance, Cornacchia and coworkers prepared LiGdF₄:Tm³⁺ single crystals utilizing the Czochralski technique [38], while Lepoutre and coworkers prepared 90SiO₂10LiGd_1-xEu_xF₄ ( or 0.05) composites using a sol-gel method [39]. Moreover, Xiong’s group successfully synthesized LiGdF₄ nanoparticles with different Ca²⁺ contents using a thermal decomposition method, revealing that Ca²⁺ ions are vital to the successful synthesis of these nanoparticles [40]. Na and coworkers prepared pure tetragonal-phase LiGdF₄ upconversion nanophosphors doped with Y³⁺ by thermal decomposition in a methanol-LiOH·H₂O-NH₄F mixture and showed that the orthorhombic GdF₃ phase was produced at Y³⁺ doping degrees of 0-20 mol% [41]. Initially, we tried to prepare LiGdF₄:Yb,Er nanocrystals by similar methods of LiYF₄:Yb,Er nanocrystals used, while we did not get the result we wanted. After careful analysis, we speculate that it may be caused by various facts, such as chemical factor itself, equipment factor, and experimental environmental factor. Furthermore, we noted that the vast majority of LiGdF₄:Yb,Er nanocrystal syntheses employ solutions of oleic acid and 1-octadecenein methanol, which are highly toxic.

To address this challenge, we have developed a suitable synthetic route to prepare high-quality LiGdF₄:Yb/Er nanocrystals avoiding extra ion doping and the use of methanol-LiOH·H₂O-NH₄F mixtures. An improved thermal decomposition method is introduced in this paper. Moreover, we determined optimal reaction conditions and investigated the influence of reaction temperature, reaction time, and LiOH·H₂O content on the upconversion luminescence properties and luminescence lifetimes.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

The synthesis was carried out using standard oxygen-free procedures and commercially available reagents. RE₂O₃ (, Yb³⁺ 99.99%, and Er³⁺ 99.99%), CF₃COOH (analytical grade 99.0%), oleic acid (OA, analytical grade), and LiOH·H₂O (>95.0%) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Beijing Co. Ltd. Absolute ethanol (), cyclohexane (analytical grade 99.5%), and 1-octadecene (ODE, technical grade 90%) were purchased from Tianjin Chemical Co., Kemeng, and Sigma-Aldrich, respectively. All chemicals were used without further purification.

2.2. Synthesis of Precursor Mixture

We improved and modified previously reported methods to synthesize trifluoroacetate precursors [42–44]. Compared with the traditional preparation process of single trifluoroacetates of the lanthanides [Ln(CF₃COO)₃, , Yb, and Er] and Li(CF₃COO)₃ samples, we are mixing the two to prepare precursor mixture. As for reaction vessel, we choose a 100 mL Teflon-lined autoclave to replace the traditional 100 mL three-neck flask. The process was carried out via adding Gd₂O₃ (0.78 mmol), Yb₂O₃ (0.2 mmol), Er₂O₃ (0.02 mmol), and a certain amount of LiOH·H₂O to the mixture solution of trifluoroacetic acid/water (6 mL : 6 mL). This turbid solution was vigorously stirred and transferred to a 100 mL Teflon-lined autoclave. Subsequently, the emulsion was heated and maintained at 80°C. After confinement for 12 h, the solution was cooled to room temperature and transferred to a 100 mL three-neck flask and dryly heated up at 60°C for evaporating excess CF₃COOH/H₂O. Then, the precursor mixture was obtained. The profit about such doing is that the preparation process will be safer and more convenient. It is mainly because a mixed solution of methanol, LiOH·H₂O, and NH₄F for providing Li⁺ or other doped ions is required in the traditional preparation process, while none of these is required in our preparation.

2.3. Synthesis of High-Quality Yb³⁺/Er³⁺-Codoped LiGdF₄ Colloidal Nanocrystals

The high-quality Yb³⁺/Er³⁺-codoped LiGdF₄ colloidal nanocrystals were prepared by a thermal decomposition route. The process was carried out via adding 15 mL OA and 15 mL ODE to precursor mixture. The cloudy solution was vigorously stirred to yield a transparent solution. Subsequently, the transparent solution was heated to 110°C under vacuum condition for removing needless water/oxygen. An hour later, the solution was heated to 310°C (or 280°C, 290°C, and 300°C) under an argon gas atmosphere and maintained for a period of time (1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, or 6 h). The reaction system was cooled to room temperature and added excess absolute ethanol to precipitate products. The as-synthesized products were washed several times with cyclohexane/ethanol (1 : 4) mixed solution to remove the residue of organic ligands and other mixtures on the products and isolated by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 3 min. Finally, the products were dried under vacuum to 60°C for 12 h to obtain a white powder sample for reserving.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Synthetic Procedure and Reaction Mechanism

Figure 1 illustrates the synthesis of high-quality Yb³⁺/Er³⁺-codoped LiGdF₄ colloidal nanocrystals, showing that it comprised two steps, namely, hydrothermal preparation of the precursor mixture, followed by thermal decomposition to afford LiGdF₄ colloidal nanocrystals.

To get better understanding, the nucleation and growth mechanisms of LiGdF₄:Yb_0.2/Er_0.02 colloidal nanocrystals are speculated in Scheme 1. Briefly, the process starts with the cothermolysis of Gd(CF₃COO)₃ and CF₃COOLi in oleic acid and 1-octadecene systems. When the reaction system is heated to 100~120°C, trifluoroacetate ligands are partially exchanged for oleic acid residues, and the C-F bond of the former is broken to release F^- when the reaction temperature further increases to 250~330°C. Subsequently, fluoride anions engage in fluorination and cleave Gd-OOCCF₃ bonds to promote nucleation, and the thus obtained crystal nuclei agglomerate to form larger particles as the reaction progresses. With the increase of temperature, the growth rate of these nuclei crystal nucleus increases and eventually forms nanocrystals [45–48].

3.2. Structure and Morphology

Sample crystal structures were characterized by using a Rigaku Ultima IV X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation () at 200 mA and 40 kV. XRD patterns were recorded for dried powders in the range of at a step size of 8°/min. Figure 2 clearly demonstrates the growth kinetics of LiGdF₄:Yb³⁺/Er³⁺ nanocrystals synthesized at different reaction times. It is not hard to find that the diffraction peaks of samples obtained at and , 2 h, and 3 h corresponded to a mixture of LiGdF₄ (JCPDS No. 27-1236) and GdF₃ (JCPDS No. 49-1804), whereas those obtained at and and 5 h contain LiGdF₄ (JCPDS No. 27-1236). Hence, 4 or 5 h was concluded to be the optimal reaction times for synthesizing LiGdF₄:Yb³⁺/Er³⁺ nanocrystals.

Next, we studied the optimum reaction temperature for preparing LiGdF₄:Yb³⁺/Er³⁺ colloidal nanocrystals. Figure 3 clearly demonstrates the formation of LiGdF₄ with GdF₃ at and temperatures () of 280, 290, and 300°C, revealing that LiGdF₄ nuclei were instantly formed even at 280°C and that the growth rate of these nuclei increased with the increasing temperature. A balance between nucleation and growth was established at 310°C, which was concluded to be the optimum reaction temperature for the synthesized tetragonal LiGdF₄:Yb³⁺/Er³⁺ nanocrystals. Finally, the optimum Li/RE ratio was determined as three, although the optimization of Li⁺ concentration proved to be very tortuous. Details of the synthetic process and parameters of tetragonal-phase LiGdF₄:Yb³⁺/Er³⁺ colloidal nanocrystals are given in the supporting information (Figure S1, S2, and Table S1). Thus, the above experimental results suggest that the optimum conditions for tetragonal LiGdF₄:Yb³⁺/Er³⁺ nanocrystal synthesis were determined as , , and (Table S1).

Sample morphology was assessed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) with a FEI Tecnai G2 F20 S-Twin transmission electron microscope operating at 200 kV. Samples for TEM imaging were prepared by drying nanocrystal dispersions in cyclohexane on amorphous carbon-coated Cu grids. Representative TEM micrographs of as-synthesized LiGdF₄ nanocrystals (relatively pure tetragonal phase) are displayed in Figure 4. Figures 4(a)–4(d) show low-magnification TEM images, while Figures 5(a) and 5(b) show high-magnification TEM images with related selected-area electron diffraction patterns, revealing that the as-synthesized LiGdF₄:Yb³⁺/Er³⁺ nanocrystals can withstand irradiation with high-energy electrons. From the TEM images, we can also see that most of the samples are octahedron and sphere. And the average sizes of these crystals focus on 137.7 nm nearby in Figure 4(e), while the octahedral crystals focus on on average. HRTEM imaging revealed the presence of obvious lattice fringes, indicating the high crystallinity of individual particles. The adjacent lattice spacing calculated by FFT analysis (~0.47 nm) was assigned to the (101) crystal plane of tetragonal-phase LiGdF₄, which confirmed that as-synthesized LiGdF₄ nanocrystals exhibited high crystallinity and few defects.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(a)

(b)

3.3. Upconversion Luminescence

Upconversion emission spectra were recorded on a Hitachi F-4600 fluorescence spectrophotometer (, , and ) under excitation with an adjustable 980 nm NIR laser diode. Room temperature upconversion emission spectra are obtained by drying the nanocrystal dispersion in cyclohexane at a concentration of 2 mg/mL. It is formed into a colloidal solution by dispersing dried powder in cyclohexane for several hours’ ultrasound.

It is well known that Yb³⁺- and Er³⁺-codoped rare earth fluorides can exhibit strong upconversion luminescence upon 980 nm near-infrared excitation, as observed herein for the colloidal suspension of LiGdF₄:Yb³⁺/Er³⁺. Two visible-light-region emission bands, positioned at 523 and 543 nm (green upconversion luminescence) and 672 nm (red upconversion luminescence), were observed for all samples in Figures 6(a) and 6(b). The above bands were ascribed to ²H_11/2 → ⁴I_15/2, ⁴S_3/2 → ⁴I_15/2, and ⁴F_9/2 → ⁴I_15/2 transitions, respectively. Meanwhile, we also find that the intensity of upconversion luminescence increased with increasing reaction time, which was mainly attributed to the concomitant increase of tetragonal phase content. This phase could be obtained in relatively pure form at , , and , while mixtures of LiGdF₄ with GdF₃, exhibiting lower upconversion luminescence intensities because of the presence of the latter component and other impurities, were obtained otherwise. It is surprising that there is a sudden drop in the upconversion luminescence intensity of the sample, which is synthesized at , , and . This finding might be attributed to the fact that the content of GdF₃ and other impurities in the above sample exceeded that in the optimal condition sample.

(a)

(b)

(c)

In addition, it might be that the growth rate of LiGdF₄ crystal nucleus reached the maximum at 4 h, while the reaction time that further increased to 5 h might lead to excessive surfactant and activator ions accumulate on the crystal surface. All of these cause fluorescence quenching of the sample, which is synthesized at , , and . The clear contrast figures of emission intensity and reaction time are provided in the supporting information (Figure S3 and Table S2). To gain further insights into the upconversion emission process, we investigated the dependence of upconversion emission intensity on excitation power adopting the relation for data analysis in Figure 6(c). We regard the tetragonal LiGdF₄ nanocrystals as example to illuminate the upconversion emission process. The slopes of Gaussian function-based log-log fits were determined as 2.11 and 1.95 for the dominant green emissions at 523 and 543 nm, respectively, which illustrated that these emissions involve a two-photon process. For red emission, the corresponding slope was obtained as 2.37, and the same conclusion was drawn. It corresponds with the analysis of upconversion emissions mechanism.

Figure 7 schematically illustrates energy transfer and upconversion emission processes occurring at an excitation wavelength of 980 nm and a pump power density of 55 mW/cm². Under continuous excitation at 980 nm photon, sensitizer Yb³⁺ ions can be excited from the ²F_7/2 ground state to the ²F_5/2 state. Subsequently, the latter states decay back to the former, and the released energy is captured by nearby Er³⁺ ions, which are excited from the ⁴I_15/2 ground state into the ⁴I_11/2 state. Further energy capture by Er³⁺ ions in the ⁴I_11/2 excited state results in the population of a higher-lying ⁴F_7/2 state that can relax to the ²H_11/2 and ⁴S_3/2 levels (nonradiatively) and to the ⁴I_15/2 level (radiatively) with dominant ²H_11/2 → ⁴I_15/2 and ⁴S_3/2 → ⁴I_15/2 transitions resulting in green emission. Alternatively, Er³⁺ ions in the ⁴I_11/2 excited state can nonradiatively relax to the ⁴I_13/2 state and capture further energy to populate a higher-lying ⁴F_9/2 state that subsequently radiatively relaxes to the ⁴I_15/2 level with dominant ⁴F_9/2 → ⁴I_15/2 transitions resulting in red emissions. Notably, as-synthesized LiGdF₄ nanocrystals not only showed higher upconversion emission intensity but also longer luminescence lifetime (Figure 8 and Figure S4).

The decay of upconversion luminescence was recorded at room temperature using a lifetime fluorescence spectrometer (Delta Flex TCSPC system, Horiba Scientific, Scotland) equipped with an adjustable pulse laser as excitation source (, , , and ). The obtained decay curves were fitted by a single-exponential function, and the effective UCL lifetime of nonexponential decay was calculated as where is the maximum upconversion luminescence intensity and is the upconversion luminescence intensity as a function of time [49, 50]. The UCL lifetimes of the ²H_11/2 state, determined by monitoring Er³⁺ emission at 523 nm under 980 nm, were found to increase with a reaction time of up to 4 h, equalling 369.30 (2 h), 663.23 (3 h), 745.74 μs (4 h), and 540.45 μs (5 h), respectively (Figure 8). This result confirmed that the sample synthesized at , , and exhibited good photostability because of the relatively pure tetragonal phase. In other samples, the presence of impurity ingredients led to the rapid migration of energy to lattice defects or surface quenchers, inducing luminescence quenching. This behaviour was consistent with the trend of upconversion emission intensity in Figure 6(a). Finally, we measured the lifetimes of ²H_11/2, ⁴S_3/2, and ⁴F_9/2 states of Er³⁺ under 980 nm excitation in LiGdF₄:Yb³⁺/Er³⁺ nanocrystals, synthesized at , , and (Figure S4), revealing increases from 663.23 μs (523 nm) and 665.54 μs (543 nm) to 678.41 μs (672 nm), respectively.

4. Conclusion

We have successfully improved and modified previously reported methods to synthesize high-quality Yb³⁺/Er³⁺-codoped LiGdF₄ colloidal nanocrystals with intense green emission. Specifically, the above synthesis involved the hydrothermal preparation of trifluoroacetate precursors Gd(CF₃COO)₃ and CF₃COOLi that were subsequently thermolyzed to afford the desired nanocrystals. Importantly, the adopted approach obviated the need for additional ion doping and the use of toxic methanol-LiOH·H₂O-NH₄F mixture. Studies on the impact of LiOH·H₂O concentration, reaction temperature, and time on the upconversion luminescence of nanocrystal samples showed that relatively phase-pure tetragonal LiGdF₄ nanocrystals could be obtained under optimal conditions (, , and ). Moreover, as-synthesized LiGdF₄:Yb³⁺/Er³⁺ nanocrystals not only showed a stronger upconversion emission intensity but also featured a longer luminescence lifetime. This work paves the way to the broad utilization of LiGdF₄, which is viewed as an ideal alternative matrix material, since the ionic radius of Li⁺ is much smaller than that of Na⁺. Herein, this research work will be indispensable for further follow-up study.

Data Availability

All data are obtained through our own experiments. The public database is not used in this article. If the reader needs the data in this article, he can contact the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge professor Gejihu De for guiding and the testing Center of Inner Mongolia University. This work is supported by the Postgraduate Scientific Research Innovation Foundation of Inner Mongolia University (Grant No. CXJJS15082), Open Fund of the State Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics (Grant No. IOSKL2013KF08), National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21261016), and Talents Project Inner Mongolia of China (Grant No. CYYC5026).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material including X-ray diffraction patterns of as-prepared samples, decay curves of LiGdF₄:Yb³⁺/Er³⁺ nanocrystals, and discussion of influencing factors (such as temperature, time, and emission intensity). (Supplementary Materials)

References

Z. L. Wang, H. L. W. Chan, H. L. Li, and J. H. Hao, “Highly efficient low-voltage cathodoluminescence of LaF₃:Ln³⁺ (Ln=Eu³⁺,Ce³⁺,Tb³⁺) spherical particles,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, no. 14, article 141106, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Zhang and D. Zhao, “Fabrication of ordered magnetite-doped rare earth fluoride nanotube arrays by nanocrystal self-assembly,” Nano Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 292–305, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Fan, S. Wang, W. Xu, M. Li, H. Sun, and L. Hu, “Enormously enhanced upconversion emission in β-NaYF₄:20Yb,2Er microcrystals via Na⁺ ion exchange,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 869–877, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Vetrone, R. Naccache, A. Zamarrón et al., “Temperature sensing using fluorescent nanothermometers,” ACS Nano, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 3254–3258, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Mahalingam, F. Mangiarini, F. Vetrone et al., “Bright white upconversion emission from Tm³⁺/Yb³⁺/Er³⁺-doped Lu₃Ga₅O₁₂ nanocrystals,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 46, pp. 17745–17749, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zou, M. Xu, W. Yuan et al., “A water-dispersible dye-sensitized upconversion nanocomposite modified with phosphatidylcholine for lymphatic imaging,” Chemical Communications, vol. 52, no. 91, pp. 13389–13392, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Yang, X. Li, D. Chi, H. Zhang, and X. Liu, “Lanthanide-doped upconversion materials: emerging applications for photovoltaics and photocatalysis,” Nanotechnology, vol. 25, no. 48, article 482001, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zhang, H. P. Zhou, L. Y. Liao et al., “Luminescence modulation of ordered upconversion nanopatterns by a photochromic diarylethene: rewritable optical storage with nondestructive readout,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 633–637, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Zako, H. Nagata, N. Terada, M. Sakono, K. Soga, and M. Maeda, “Improvement of dispersion stability and characterization of upconversion nanophosphors covalently modified with PEG as a fluorescence bioimaging probe,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 43, no. 15, pp. 5325–5330, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Wang and X. Liu, “Recent advances in the chemistry of lanthanide-doped upconversion nanocrystals,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 976–989, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Guo, Z. Li, H. Qian, Y. Hu, and I. N. Muhammad, “Seed-mediated synthesis of NaY F₄:Y b, Er/NaGdF₄ nanocrystals with improved upconversion fluorescence and MR relaxivity,” Nanotechnology, vol. 21, no. 12, article 125602, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. V. Eliseeva and J. C. G. Bünzli, “Lanthanide luminescence for functional materials and bio-sciences,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 189–227, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. M. Tissue, “Synthesis and luminescence of lanthanide ions in nanoscale insulating hosts,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 2837–2845, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kim, Y. Piao, and T. Hyeon, “Multifunctional nanostructured materials for multimodal imaging, and simultaneous imaging and therapy,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 372–390, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Liu, X. Kong, Y. Zhang et al., “Breakthrough in concentration quenching threshold of upconversion luminescence via spatial separation of the emitter doping area for bio-applications,” Chemical Communications, vol. 47, no. 43, pp. 11957–11959, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Liu, Y. Chen, Y. Lin, Q. Tan, Z. Luo, and Y. Huang, “Energy transfer in Yb³⁺–Er³⁺-codoped bismuth borate glasses,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1046–1052, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Wang, J. Wang, J. Xu, X. Xue, H. Chen, and X. Liu, “Tunable upconversion emissions from lanthanide-doped monodisperse β-NaYF₄ nanoparticles,” Spectroscopy Letters, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 400–405, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. van der Kolk, P. Dorenbos, K. Krämer, D. Biner, and H. U. Güdel, “High-resolution luminescence spectroscopy study of down-conversion routes inNaGdF₄:Nd³⁺ and NaGdF₄:Tm³⁺ using synchrotron radiation,” Physical Review B, vol. 77, no. 12, article 125110, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Li and J. Lin, “Rare earth fluoride nano-/microcrystals: synthesis, surface modification and application,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 33, pp. 6831–6847, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. Diamente, M. Raudsepp, and F. C. J. M. van Veggel, “Dispersible Tm³⁺-doped nanoparticles that exhibit strong 1.47 μm photoluminescence,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 363–368, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. T. Wegh, H. Donker, K. D. Oskam, and A. Meijerink, “Visible quantum cutting in LiGdF₄:Eu³⁺ through downconversion,” Science, vol. 283, no. 5402, pp. 663–666, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. You, S. Huang, S. Liu, and Y. Tao, “VUV excited luminescence of MGdF₄:Eu³⁺ (M=Na, K, NH₄),” Journal of Luminescence, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 95–99, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Naccache, F. Vetrone, V. Mahalingam, L. A. Cuccia, and J. A. Capobianco, “Controlled synthesis and water dispersibility of hexagonal phase NaGdF₄:Ho³⁺/Yb³⁺ nanoparticles,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 717–723, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Li, S. Liu, H. Zhang, E. Wang, L. Song, and P. Wang, “Ultraviolet upconversion luminescence in Y₂O₃:Yb³⁺,Tm³⁺ nanocrystals and its application in photocatalysis,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 2882–2886, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wu, C. Li, D. Yang, and J. Lin, “Rare earth β-NaGdF₄ fluorides with multiform morphologies: hydrothermal synthesis and luminescent properties,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 354, no. 2, pp. 429–436, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Dong, L. D. Sun, and C. H. Yan, “Energy transfer in lanthanide upconversion studies for extended optical applications,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1608–1634, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. De Nadaï, A. Demourgues, L. Lozano, P. Gravereau, and J. Grannec, “Structural investigations of new copper fluorides NaRECu₂F₈ (RE³⁺=Sm³⁺, Eu³⁺, Gd³⁺, Y³⁺, Er³⁺, Yb³⁺),” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 2487–2491, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. X. Mai, Y. W. Zhang, R. Si et al., “High-quality sodium rare-earth fluoride nanocrystals: controlled synthesis and optical properties,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 128, no. 19, pp. 6426–6436, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Park, M. J. Baek, E. S. Choi et al., “Paramagnetic ultrasmall gadolinium oxide nanoparticles as advanced T₁ MRI contrast agent: account for large longitudinal relaxivity, optimal particle diameter, and in vivo T₁ MR images,” ACS Nano, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 3663–3669, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Naccache, P. Chevallier, J. Lagueux et al., “High relaxivities and strong vascular signal enhancement for NaGdF₄ nanoparticles designed for dual MR/optical imaging,” Advanced Healthcare Materials, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 1478–1488, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Lv, S. Gai, Y. Dai, N. Niu, F. He, and P. Yang, “Highly uniform hollow GdF₃ spheres: controllable synthesis, tuned luminescence, and drug-release properties,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 5, no. 21, pp. 10806–10818, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Chen, X. Li, F. Liu, H. Zhang, and Z. Wang, “Renal clearable peptide functionalized NaGdF₄ nanodots for high-efficiency tracking orthotopic colorectal tumor in mouse,” Molecular Pharmaceutics, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 3134–3141, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ahrén, L. Selegård, A. Klasson et al., “Synthesis and characterization of PEGylated Gd₂O₃ nanoparticles for MRI contrast enhancement,” Langmuir, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 5753–5762, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Dühnen, T. Rinkel, and M. Haase, “Size control of nearly monodisperse β-NaGdF₄ particles prepared from small α-NaGdF₄ nanocrystals,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 4033–4039, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Bridot, A. C. Faure, S. Laurent et al., “Hybrid gadolinium oxide nanoparticles: multimodal contrast agents for in vivo imaging,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 129, no. 16, pp. 5076–5084, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Liu, Z. Gao, J. Zeng et al., “Magnetic/upconversion fluorescent NaGdF₄:Yb,Er nanoparticle-based dual-modal molecular probes for imaging tiny tumors in vivo,” ACS Nano, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 7227–7240, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. J. J. Johnson, W. Oakden, G. J. Stanisz, R. Scott Prosser, and F. C. J. M. van Veggel, “Size-tunable, ultrasmall NaGdF₄ nanoparticles: insights into their T₁ MRI contrast enhancement,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 3714–3722, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Cornacchia, A. Di Lieto, and M. Tonelli, “LiGdF₄:Tm³⁺: spectroscopy and diode-pumped laser experiments,” Applied Physics B, vol. 96, no. 2-3, pp. 363–368, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lepoutre, D. Boyer, S. Fujihara, and R. Mahiou, “Structural and optical characterizations of sol–gel based composites constituted of LiGdF₄:Eu³⁺ nanocrystallites dispersed into a silica matrix,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 18, pp. 2784–2788, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Xiong, Y. Yang, and Y. Wang, “Enhanced upconversion luminescence and tuned red-to-green emission ratio of LiGdF₄ nanocrystals via Ca²⁺ doping,” RSC Advances, vol. 6, no. 79, pp. 75664–75668, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Na, J. S. Jeong, H. J. Chang et al., “Facile synthesis of intense green light emitting LiGdF₄:Yb,Er-based upconversion bipyramidal nanocrystals and their polymer composites,” Nanoscale, vol. 6, no. 13, pp. 7461–7468, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. S. Yi, W. B. Lee, and G. M. Chow, “Synthesis of LiYF₄, BaYF₅, and NaLaF₄ optical nanocrystals,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 2790–2794, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. T. Wong, F. Vetrone, R. Naccache, H. L. W. Chan, J. Hao, and J. A. Capobianco, “Water dispersible ultra-small multifunctional KGdF₄:Tm³⁺, Yb³⁺ nanoparticles with near-infrared to near-infrared upconversion,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 21, no. 41, pp. 16589–16596, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Cheng, J. Sui, and W. Cai, “Enhanced upconversion emission in Yb³⁺ and Er³⁺ codoped NaGdF₄ nanocrystals by introducing Li⁺ ions,” Nanoscale, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 779–784, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Li, H. Schnablegger, and S. Mann, “Coupled synthesis and self-assembly of nanoparticles to give structures with controlled organization,” Nature, vol. 402, no. 6760, pp. 393–395, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Shin, J. H. Kyhm, A. R. Hong et al., “Multicolor tunable upconversion luminescence from sensitized seed-mediated grown LiGdF₄:Yb,Tm-based core/triple-shell nanophosphors for transparent displays,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 30, no. 23, pp. 8457–8464, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-P. Du, Y.-W. Zhang, L.-D. Sun, and C.-H. Yan, “Optically active uniform potassium and lithium rare earth fluoride nanocrystals derived from metal trifluroacetate precursors,” Dalton Transactions, no. 40, pp. 8574–8581, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Jones, K. D. Osberg, R. J. Macfarlane, M. R. Langille, and C. A. Mirkin, “Templated techniques for the synthesis and assembly of plasmonic nanostructures,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 3736–3827, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Xie, X. Xie, C. Mi et al., “Controlled synthesis, evolution mechanisms, and luminescent properties of ScF_x:Ln (x = 2.76, 3) nanocrystals,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 29, no. 22, pp. 9758–9766, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Dong, L. D. Sun, W. Feng, Y. Gu, F. Li, and C. H. Yan, “Versatile spectral and lifetime multiplexing nanoplatform with excitation orthogonalized upconversion luminescence,” ACS Nano, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 3289–3297, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2019 Lu Zi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1293

Downloads

907

Citations

Journal of Nanomaterials

Facile Synthesis of Yb3+- and Er3+-Codoped LiGdF4 Colloidal Nanocrystals with High-Quality Upconversion Luminescence

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

2.2. Synthesis of Precursor Mixture

2.3. Synthesis of High-Quality Yb3+/Er3+-Codoped LiGdF4 Colloidal Nanocrystals

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Synthetic Procedure and Reaction Mechanism

3.2. Structure and Morphology

3.3. Upconversion Luminescence

4. Conclusion

Data Availability

Conflicts of Interest

Acknowledgments

Supplementary Materials

References

Copyright

Facile Synthesis of Yb³⁺- and Er³⁺-Codoped LiGdF₄ Colloidal Nanocrystals with High-Quality Upconversion Luminescence

2.3. Synthesis of High-Quality Yb³⁺/Er³⁺-Codoped LiGdF₄ Colloidal Nanocrystals