Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2021 / Article
Special Issue

Advanced Applications of Organometallic Nanomaterials

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 5542281 |

Trung Dang-Bao, Hong Phuong Phan, Phung Anh Nguyen, Pham Phuong Trang Vo, Van Tien Huynh, Tri Nguyen, "Synergistic Effects of Co3O4-CeO2 Nanoparticles towards Catalytic Oxidation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons: A Study in Association with Carbon Monoxide and Humidity", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2021, Article ID 5542281, 9 pages, 2021.

Synergistic Effects of Co3O4-CeO2 Nanoparticles towards Catalytic Oxidation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons: A Study in Association with Carbon Monoxide and Humidity

Academic Editor: Duy Trinh Nguyen
Received18 Jan 2021
Revised06 Apr 2021
Accepted24 Apr 2021
Published12 May 2021


In this study, a series of Co3O4-CeO2 nanocomposites with various Co3O4 loading were fabricated by the impregnation method using cobalt(II) acetate as the cobalt precursor for the treatment of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX). The as-prepared Co3O4-CeO2 nanocomposites were thoroughly characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Brumauer-Emmett-Teller (BET), hydrogen temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR), and temperature-programmed desorption (O2-TPD). The excellent reproduction of active oxygen species caused by the high dispersion of Co3O4 crystals on the CeO2 supports was established. In addition, the reduction peaks of Co3O4-CeO2 nanocomposites were found at much lower temperatures compared to pure CeO2, considering their unique redox property influencing on the high catalytic activity. Among the characterized materials, the 5.0 wt.% Co3O4 supported on CeO2 (5.0Co–Ce) was the best system for catalytic oxidation of xylene, along with excellent performances in the cases of benzene, ethylbenzene, and toluene. Its catalytic activity increased in the order: . Furthermore, the addition of carbon monoxide (CO) as a coreactant permitted to improve the catalytic performances in such oxidations as well as the stability of as-prepared catalysts, even under humid conditions.

1. Introduction

Aromatic hydrocarbons involving benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) are air pollutants, mainly found in oil deposits and natural gas, or petroleum refining and petrochemical plants [1, 2]. Many serious health threats (nausea, headache, and fatigue) can be posed by exposure to BTEX for a long time [3]. Therefore, the elimination of BTEX is urgent, normally based on chemical reaction with chemical reagents, adsorption process using porous materials, and catalytic oxidation with a heterogeneous catalyst. In particular, catalytic oxidation processes have been delighted as the most important and up-and-coming technologies, due to the simple operation of equipment, the high removal efficiency, producing nontoxic products involving CO2 and H2O [4].

Commonly, the composites of CoOx-CeO2 exhibited excellent catalytic performances in low-temperature volatile organic compounds oxidation [5], CO oxidation [6], and N2O decomposition [7]. Synergistic effect of CoOx and CeO2 on such processes has been illuminated, taking into account the oxygen mobility on the oxides surfaces and the oxygen storage capacity (OSC) of CeO2 [8]. In comparison with expensive Pt-based catalysts, CoOx displayed the equivalent catalytic activity. Besides, supported-CoOx catalysts have been favored than nonsupported ones as the results of their sintering resistance as well as higher activity [9]. Recent efforts focused on CeO2 support considering its high OSC [10], oxygen mobility [11], and acidic features [12]. Besides, the metal-support synergy based on CeO2 support results in the high dispersion of CoOx in their matrix.

The most frequently used method to synthesize CoOx-CeO2 composites is the aqueous impregnation of CeO2 support in the aqueous solutions of cobalt salts. The metal site dispersion on CeO2 determines both their activity and selectivity, prompting the development of synthetic methods based on different cobalt salts [13] involving cobalt(II) nitrate [14], cobalt(II) acetate [15], or organometallic cobalt-based complexes. Furthermore, the redox flexibility of CoOx provoked by Co(III)/Co(II) couple plays a significant factor in controlling their oxidation catalytic activity [9, 16]. The reducing feature could be varied depending on metal precursor types, promoters, and supports [17]. According to our previous study, the Co3O4/CeO2 catalyst coming from cobalt(II) acetate gave an excellent performance for -xylene oxidation [18]. As a part of catalyst characterization, the decrease of Co3O4 crystal size and the insertion of cobalt cations into CeO2 lattice prompted increases of surface area and bulk lattice oxygen, as well as a drop of the reducing temperature. These features provided positive impacts on the remarkable catalytic performances of Co3O4-doped CeO2.

In the catalytic oxidation processes of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and CO, water vapor (as an oxidation product or moisture in the gas) can influence on the reaction kinetics, leading to the interference on their reaction rate [19]. In fact, the surface OH- groups can block active sites, as well as cutting off oxygen exchange at catalyst sites/support interfaces [20]. The surface OH- groups formation was boosted by high concentrations of water vapor and oxygen [21]. Thus, the oxygen exchange capability of catalytic supports and the metal-support synergy should be governed with the aim of enhancing the VOC removal in the presence of water vapor. It was consistent with the abovementioned properties of CeO2 and the synergistic effects of the CoOx-CeO2 mixed oxides.

In this study, the influences of cobalt contents on the physicochemical characteristics of CeO2 nanoparticles-supported Co3O4 were investigated, shedding light on their catalytic activities towards the BTEX deep oxidation, in particular in the presence of CO and water vapor.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Catalyst Characteristics

Firstly, CeO2 nanoparticles coming from Ce(NO3)3.6H2O were prepared by hydrothermal approach [22], and then, a series of Co3O4 supported on CeO2 nanoparticles were fabricated by the impregnation technique using cobalt(II) acetate as the cobalt precursor (with the contents of 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 wt.% Co3O4 symbolized as 2.5Co-Ce, 5.0Co-Ce, and 7.5Co-Ce), as previously reported by our group [18] (Experimental, in the Supplementary Information). The face-centered cubic crystalline structure of CeO2 was characterized by XRD analysis and even preserved after loading of Co3O4 (Figure S1). However, the high dispersion of Co3O4 on the support interfered with the observation of their crystals for all the samples [12]. The oxidation states of the sample of 5.0 wt.% of Co3O4 supported on CeO2 (5.0Co–Ce) were studied by XPS analysis (Figure 1) by reason of the highest catalytic activity (see the next section). A major peak of Co 2p3/2 was detected at 779.7 eV binding energy (Figure 1(a)) [23], and the corresponding Co2+/Co3+ ratio in the sample was estimated at 2.54. The Ce3d XPS spectra of the 5.0Co–Ce sample (Figure 1(b)) show the exclusive presence of Ce4+ species with six peaks at 881.7 eV (α), 888.3 eV (β), 897.6 eV (γ), 900.5 eV (α), 907.2 eV (β) and 916.4 eV (γ) [24]. In fact, the high binding energy (BE) doublet α/α corresponds to Ce(IV) 3d94f2O2p4, doublet β/β is originated from Ce(IV) 3d94f1O2p5, and doublet (γ/γ) is associated to Ce(IV) 3d94f0O2p6, whereas no Ce3+ species was detected [25].

The O 1 s spectra of the 5.0Co-Ce sample (Figure 1(c)) show the peaks at medium (531.3 eV) and high (528.9 eV) binding energies indicating adsorbed surface oxygen (O2−, O, O22−) and lattice (O2−), respectively. A broad peak (533.3 eV) was observed due to the presence of the defective oxides or hydroxylated surface of the 5Co-Ce sample. This property confirmed the improvement of oxygen storage capacity and mobility provoked by the strong synergy between CeO2 and Co3O4 [26].

The adsorption-desorption isotherms (Figure 2) revealed that both Co3O4-doped and undoped CeO2 nanorods obey type IV isotherms (hysteresis loops at relative pressures greater than 0.5), confirming their mesoporous structures [27, 28]. The Barrett-Joyner-Hallenda (BJH) pore size distributions of ceria and Co-Ce samples (Figure 2) indicated their maximum pore diameters (more than 10 nm), in agreement with the mesopores of the samples. As clearly, the addition of cobalt in CeO2 did not affect their pore size distributions.

The undoped ceria sample (Ce) exhibited a BET value of 43.3 m2.g-1, an average pore diameter of 23.8 Å, and a pore volume of 0.057 cm3.g-1. The addition of CoOx from 2.5 wt.% to 5.0 wt.% led to increasing the surface area of composites (48.5-51.0 m2.g-1) but decreasing applying the higher CoOx loading (7.5 wt.% and 37.6 m2.g-1) (Figure 3), being consistent with the previous study [29]. The high surface area of Co-Ce composites may affect the BTEX oxidation activity, which depends on the number of active sites. The similarity was inspected for their pore volumes (see in Figure 4); meanwhile, the average pore diameters slightly decreased as adding CoOx to ceria (23.0-23.6 Å).

The morphologies of samples (Figure S2) show that pure CeO2 composed of homogeneous particles has a bigger size. CeO2 crystals were highly minimized by CoOx addition, particularly on the 5.0Co-Ce sample. In the Co-Ce samples, the highly dispersed CeO2 could resist the sintering of CoOx and thus improve their thermal stability [30]. Thus, the suitable content of CoOx in the 5.0Co-Ce sample could increase its surface area. The microstructural characteristics of the 5.0Co-Ce sample were observed by HR-TEM analysis (Figure 5). The CeO2 nanoparticles were 20-30 nm in diameter (being consistent with the previous SEM analysis), with (111), (200), and (220) crystal planes corresponding to the d-spacings of 0.27, 0.25, and 0.27 nm. Furthermore, Co3O4 nanocubes (the range size of 10-15 nm) were dispersed on CeO2 nanoparticles, with the d-spacings of 0.15 and 0.16 nm assigned to (220) and (111) crystal planes of the Co3O4 phase.

The FT-IR spectrum of CeO2 exhibited the presence of absorption bands at 450 cm-1, 1630 cm-1, and 3430 cm-1 (broad) attributed to CeO2 stretching, the molecular H2O bending [31], and the O-H stretching vibrations of hydroxyl functional groups [32], respectively (Figure 6). The absorption characteristics were not different after loading Co3O4 on CeO2. However, the FT-IR spectra of Co3O4-CeO2 nanocomposites showed the higher signal intensities, proving that CoOx crystals are inserted into CeO2 lattice and highly dispersed on CeO2 supports. In particular, the 5.0Co-Ce sample showed the highest peak intensity and thus the superior catalytic activity in BTEX deep oxidation (see the next section).

The O2-TPD profiles of Co-Ce samples (Figure 7) indicated the oxygen desorption bands attributed to different oxygen species: surface-active oxygen (<350°C), surface lattice oxygen (350-500°C), and bulk phase lattice oxygen (>500°C) [33]. With the undoped CeO2, two desorption peaks of surface adsorbed oxygen species at low temperatures (<350°C) were detected. Meanwhile, when Co3O4 was added to CeO2 (2.5-5.0 wt.%), the more oxygen desorption peaks appeared and shifted to higher temperatures, indicating an obvious growth of O2 adsorption capacity. By the increase of Co3O4 concentration (7.5 wt.%), the area of the peaks decreased, pointing out the difficulties in producing surface-active oxygen applying the higher CoOx contents. In this study, the 5.0Co-Ce catalyst gave the highest surface-active oxygen production, suggesting the better O2 adsorption [34], being essential for their remarkable catalytic activity in BTEX deep oxidation.

The H2-TPR profile of CeO2 (Figure 8) displayed the weak and broad peaks at 400°C and 800°C, representing the reductions of surface and subsurface oxygen of ceria, respectively. On the Co-Ce nanocomposites, three reduction bands were detected at much lower temperatures with higher intensities in comparison with the pure ceria. The first peak at 200-320°C was contributed by the reduction from Co3+ to Co2+ and/or Co2+ to Co0, the second peak with low intensity at 350-450°C was attributed to characteristic for Co3O4 bounded to CeO2, and the third broad peak at 750-850°C was associated to the reduction of ceria subsurface oxygen [6, 35]. The ceria reducibility was enhanced with the assistance of Co3O4, because of a hydrogen spillover from cobalt to ceria. In which, the 5.0Co-Ce sample showed the highest reduction peaks at lower temperature range, accordingly being more easily reduced and the highest consumption of hydrogen. The results evidenced that the well-dispersed CeO2 across the Co-Ce nanocomposites boosted the synergistic effect between CeO2 and Co3O4, facilitating the active oxygen reproduction and thus improving the catalytic activity.

2.2. Catalytic Activity

Effect of cobalt contents on the catalytic activity in -xylene oxidation (Figure 9) showed that the low conversions were achieved using the pure CeO2 catalyst in the temperature range from 225 to 300°C (59.7% conversion at 300°C). On the other hand, the cobalt addition into the catalytic systems tremendously improved the catalytic performance. For all Co-Ce samples, the higher the reaction temperatures were, the higher the -xylene conversions were. Generally, they reached over 85% conversions at 285°C and the 5.0Co-Ce sample was the most efficient (92.6% conversion at 285°C). These results are quite consistent with the previous catalyst characterization of the 5.0Co-Ce sample (5.0 wt.% Co3O4) involving the smallest particle size, remarkable specific surface area, the most easily reduced catalyst, and the highest strength of the bonds on the surface.

The catalytic activity of the best system (5.0Co-Ce) in BTEX oxidation (Figure 10) indicated the increase of its catalytic activity following the order: . In fact, the treatment efficiency of aromatic compounds mainly depends on the adsorption strength of aromatic hydrocarbons, the C-H strength, and the ionization potential of methyl derivatives. In which, it reached 100, 98, 92, and 75% conversions corresponding to toluene, ethylbenzene, -xylene, and benzene at 285°C. Balzer and coworkers reported Co2O3 (20 wt.%) catalysts supported on CeO2+γ-Al2O3 towards VOC oxidation involving -hexane (96% conversion), benzene (90% conversion), toluene (70% conversion), and -xylene (58% conversion) at 350°C [36]. Meanwhile, 20 wt.% Co2O3/γ-Al2O3-undoped CeO2 achieved only 50%, 45%, 35%, and 25% conversions under the similar conditions. Wu and coworkers synthesized supported Au catalyst (1.5 wt.%) applied in -xylene oxidation [37], reaching 30%, 14%, and 9% conversions at 300°C on Au/ZnO, Au/Al2O3, and Au/MgO catalysts, respectively. In comparison to the catalytic activities as abovementioned, the 5.0Co-Ce catalyst gave a better catalytic performance, rising the efficient catalytic systems towards the BTEX oxidation.

The catalytic performances of the 5.0Co-Ce sample for -xylene in the absence and presence of CO, the single CO oxidation are shown in Figure 11. The complete CO conversion in both cases was below 275°C. In the assistance of CO, an increase of the catalytic performance in -xylene oxidation was observed. The exothermicity of the CO oxidation was the cause of enhanced activity (enthalpy of the reaction of CO oxidation: ) [38]. The oxidation of CO to CO2 was completed when -xylene oxidation began. The CO oxidation can locally raise the temperature of the catalyst bed and permit to activate the p-xylene oxidation.

The stability of the 5Co-Ce sample in the -xylene oxidation was examined in the presence of water vapor (Figure 12). Clearly, in the case of CO and water vapor, the -xylene conversion remained stable after 360 minutes () with various contents of water vapor (1.1-3.2 mol%). Meanwhile, without CO, the -xylene conversion decreased applying the increase of water vapor concentration (82.4% conversion without water vapor vs. 59.1% conversion in the case of steam rising to 3.2 mol% at 275°C for 360 mins). However, when the water vapor was turned off, the xylene conversion increased significantly, from 59.1% to 78.5% in 480 mins. These results proved that the adsorbed steam only competes with the reactants, leading to inhibiting the catalytic activity but not poisoning the catalytic sites. In fact, the Co-Ce catalyst system is still highly durable upon the time, proving that the addition of CO in -xylene vapor enhances both catalytic reactivity and stability.

3. Conclusion

The CoOx-CeO2 nanocomposites showed better catalytic activity in the BTEX oxidation reaction compared to the pure CeO2. The phase synergy between CoOx and CeO2 contributed to their activity improvement. The 5.0Co-Ce sample exhibited the highest catalytic performance towards BTEX oxidation, reaching 100% (toluene), 98% (ethylbenzene), 92% (-xylene), and 75% (benzene) conversions at 285°C. In contrast, the pure CeO2 showed a low -xylene conversion (43.5% at 285°C). The presence of CO improved -xylene oxidation on the 5Co-Ce catalyst owing to the exothermicity from CO oxidation, increasing the temperature of the catalyst bed, and thus activating the -xylene oxidation. Besides, the catalyst stability upon the time in such a reaction was evidenced by the addition of CO, in the assistance of water vapor. This research demonstrated the catalytic efficiency of cobalt-doped ceria nanoparticles in aromatic hydrocarbons oxidations in association with CO and humidity.

Data Availability

The experimental data used to support the findings are included as the supplementary data within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


We acknowledge the support of time and facilities from Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), VNU-HCM for this study.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1: XRD patterns of Co-Ce samples. Figure S2: SEM images of samples. (a) Ce. (b) 2.5Co-Ce. (c) 5.0Co-Ce. (d) 7.5Co-Ce. (Supplementary Materials)


  1. R. Tong, Y. Yang, G. Shao, Y. Zhang, S. Dou, and W. Jiang, “Emission sources and probabilistic health risk of volatile organic compounds emitted from production areas in a petrochemical refinery in Hainan, China,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, vol. 26, pp. 1–21, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  2. R. Roy, L. Haak, L. Li, and K. Pagilla, “Anaerobic digestion for solids reduction and detoxification of refinery waste streams,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 1552–1560, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. A. Snyder, “Experimental benzene toxicity,” in Benzene carcinogenicity, pp. 23–32, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Q. Ren, Z. Feng, S. Mo et al., “1D-Co3O4, 2D-Co3O4, 3D-Co3O4 for catalytic oxidation of toluene,” Catal Today, vol. 332, pp. 160–167, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  5. E. Colman-Lerner, M. A. Peluso, J. Sambeth, and H. Thomas, “Cerium, manganese and cerium/manganese ceramic monolithic catalysts. Study of VOCs and PM removal,” Journal of Rare Earths, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 675–682, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J.-Y. Luo, M. Meng, X. Li et al., “Mesoporous Co3O4-CeO2 and Pd/Co3O4-CeO2 catalysts: synthesis, characterization and mechanistic study of their catalytic properties for low-temperature CO oxidation,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 254, no. 2, pp. 310–324, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. Iwanek, K. Krawczyk, J. Petryk, J. W. Sobczak, and Z. Kaszkur, “Direct nitrous oxide decomposition with CoOx-CeO2 catalysts,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 106, no. 3-4, pp. 416–422, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Porsin, E. Alikin, and V. Bukhtiyarov, “A low-temperature method for measuring oxygen storage capacity of ceria-containing oxides,” Catalysis Science & Technology, vol. 6, no. 15, pp. 5891–5898, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Yin, Y. Liu, Q. Xia et al., “Oxygen vacancy-rich nitrogen-doped Co3O4 nanosheets as an efficient water-resistant catalyst for low temperature CO oxidation,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 553, pp. 427–435, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. Lu, S. Asahina, S. Takami et al., “Interconnected 3D framework of CeO2 with high oxygen storage capacity: high-resolution scanning electron microscopic observation,” ACS Applied Nano Materials, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 2346–2353, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. X. Lin, S. Li, H. He et al., “Evolution of oxygen vacancies in MnOx-CeO2 mixed oxides for soot oxidation,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 223, pp. 91–102, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  12. J. Mei, Y. Ke, Z. Yu, X. Hu, Z. Qu, and N. Yan, “Morphology-dependent properties of Co3O4/CeO2 catalysts for low temperature dibromomethane (CH2Br2) oxidation,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 320, pp. 124–134, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  13. M. Niemelä, A. Krause, T. Vaara, J. Kiviaho, and M. Reinikainen, “The effect of the precursor on the characteristics of Co/SiO2 catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 325–345, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Dou, Y. Tang, L. Nie et al., “Complete oxidation of methane on Co3O4/CeO2 nanocomposite: a synergic effect,” Catal Today, vol. 311, pp. 48–55, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  15. L. Wei, X. Dong, M. Ma et al., “Co3O4 hollow fiber: an efficient catalyst precursor for hydrolysis of sodium borohydride to generate hydrogen,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 1529–1533, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Z. Fan, W. Fang, Z. Zhang, M. Chen, and W. Shangguan, “Highly active rod-like Co3O4 catalyst for the formaldehyde oxidation reaction,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 103, pp. 10–14, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  17. J. Waikar, H. Pawar, and P. More, “Review on CO oxidation by noble and non-noble metal based catalyst,” Catalysis in Green Chemistry and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 11–24, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. T. Dang-Bao, N. P. Anh, P. H. Phuong et al., “Fabrication of cobalt-doped ceria nanorods for p-xylene deep oxidation: effects of cobalt precursor and loading,” Materials Transactions, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 1294–1300, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. M. Bae, J. B. Ko, and D. H. Kim, “Selective catalytic oxidation of carbon monoxide with carbon dioxide, water vapor and excess hydrogen on CuO–CeO2 mixed oxide catalysts,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 507–511, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Q. Dongsheng, L. Guanzhong, G. Yun, W. Yanqin, and G. Yanglong, “Effect of water vapor on the CO and CH4 catalytic oxidation over CeO2-MOx (M= Cu, Mn, Fe, Co, and Ni) mixed oxide,” Journal of Rare Earths, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 742–746, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  21. I. Friberg, N. Sadokhina, and L. Olsson, “Complete methane oxidation over Ba modified Pd/Al2O3: the effect of water vapor,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 231, pp. 242–250, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  22. R. Peng, X. Sun, S. Li et al., “Shape effect of Pt/CeO2 catalysts on the catalytic oxidation of toluene,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 306, pp. 1234–1246, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. Chen, S. Li, L. Ma, X. Zhao, and G. Fang, “Aldehyde reduced Co3O4 to form oxygen vacancy and enhance the electrochemical performance for oxygen evolution reaction and supercapacitor,” Nanotechnology, vol. 30, no. 39, article 395403, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  24. Y. Liu, C. Ma, Q. Zhang et al., “2D electron gas and oxygen vacancy induced high oxygen evolution performances for advanced Co3O4/CeO2 nanohybrids,” Advanced Materials, vol. 31, no. 21, article 1900062, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  25. E. Bêche, P. Charvin, D. Perarnau, S. Abanades, and G. Flamant, “Ce 3d XPS investigation of cerium oxides and mixed cerium oxide (CexTiyOz),” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 40, no. 3-4, pp. 264–267, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. W. Tang, X. Wu, D. Li et al., “Oxalate route for promoting activity of manganese oxide catalysts in total VOCs’ oxidation: effect of calcination temperature and preparation method,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 2544–2554, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. L. Wang, H. Liu, Y. Chen, and S. Yang, “Reverse water–gas shift reaction over co-precipitated Co–CeO2 catalysts: effect of Co content on selectivity and carbon formation,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 3682–3689, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. L. Tan, Q. Tao, H. Gao, J. Li, D. Jia, and M. Yang, “Preparation and catalytic performance of mesoporous ceria-base composites CuO/CeO2, Fe2O3/CeO2 and La2O3/CeO2,” Journal of Porous Materials, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 795–803, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. L. Xue, C. Zhang, H. He, and Y. Teraoka, “Catalytic decomposition of N2O over CeO2 promoted Co3O4 spinel catalyst,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 75, no. 3-4, pp. 167–174, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. P. A. Kumar, M. D. Tanwar, N. Russo, R. Pirone, and D. Fino, “Synthesis and catalytic properties of CeO2 and Co/CeO2 nanofibres for diesel soot combustion,” Catalysis Today, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 279–287, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. T. Mokkelbost, I. Kaus, T. Grande, and M.-A. Einarsrud, “Combustion synthesis and characterization of nanocrystalline CeO2-based powders,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 16, no. 25, pp. 5489–5494, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. L. Pautrot-d’Alençon, P. Barboux, and J.-P. Boilot, “Synthesis and acid functionalization of cerium oxide nanoparticles,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 261–267, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. B. Liu, Y. Liu, C. Li et al., “Three-dimensionally ordered macroporous Au/CeO2-Co3O4 catalysts with nanoporous walls for enhanced catalytic oxidation of formaldehyde,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 127, pp. 47–58, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  34. Y. Chen, D. Liu, L. Yang et al., “Ternary composite oxide catalysts CuO/Co3O4–CeO2 with wide temperature-window for the preferential oxidation of CO in H2-rich stream,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 234, pp. 88–98, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  35. L. Liotta, G. Di Carlo, G. Pantaleo, A. Venezia, and G. Deganello, “Co3O4/CeO2 composite oxides for methane emissions abatement: Relationship between Co3O4-CeO2 interaction and catalytic activity,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 66, no. 3-4, pp. 217–227, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. R. Balzer, L. F. D. Probst, V. Drago, W. Schreiner, and H. V. Fajardo, “Catalytic oxidation of volatile organic compounds (n-hexane, benzene, toluene, o-xylene) promoted by cobalt catalysts supported on γ-Al2O3-CeO2,” Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 757–769, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. H. Wu, L. Wang, J. Zhang, Z. Shen, and J. Zhao, “Catalytic oxidation of benzene, toluene and p-xylene over colloidal gold supported on zinc oxide catalyst,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 859–865, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. E. Genty, J. Brunet, C. Poupin, S. Ojala, S. Siffert, and R. Cousin, “Influence of CO addition on the toluene total oxidation over Co based mixed oxide catalysts,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 247, pp. 163–172, 2019. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Trung Dang-Bao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.