Synergistic Effects of Co3O4-CeO2 Nanoparticles towards Catalytic Oxidation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons: A Study in Association with Carbon Monoxide and Humidity

Dang-Bao, Trung; Phan, Hong Phuong; Nguyen, Phung Anh; Vo, Pham Phuong Trang; Huynh, Van Tien; Nguyen, Tri

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5542281

Journal of Nanomaterials

On this page

Abstract Introduction Results and Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Advanced Applications of Organometallic Nanomaterials

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 5542281 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5542281

Synergistic Effects of Co₃O₄-CeO₂ Nanoparticles towards Catalytic Oxidation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons: A Study in Association with Carbon Monoxide and Humidity

Trung Dang-Bao,^1,2Hong Phuong Phan,^1,2Phung Anh Nguyen,³Pham Phuong Trang Vo,⁴Van Tien Huynh,⁴and Tri Nguyen^3,5

Academic Editor: Duy Trinh Nguyen

Received18 Jan 2021

Revised06 Apr 2021

Accepted24 Apr 2021

Published12 May 2021

Abstract

In this study, a series of Co₃O₄-CeO₂ nanocomposites with various Co₃O₄ loading were fabricated by the impregnation method using cobalt(II) acetate as the cobalt precursor for the treatment of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX). The as-prepared Co₃O₄-CeO₂ nanocomposites were thoroughly characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Brumauer-Emmett-Teller (BET), hydrogen temperature-programmed reduction (H₂-TPR), and temperature-programmed desorption (O₂-TPD). The excellent reproduction of active oxygen species caused by the high dispersion of Co₃O₄ crystals on the CeO₂ supports was established. In addition, the reduction peaks of Co₃O₄-CeO₂ nanocomposites were found at much lower temperatures compared to pure CeO₂, considering their unique redox property influencing on the high catalytic activity. Among the characterized materials, the 5.0 wt.% Co₃O₄ supported on CeO₂ (5.0Co–Ce) was the best system for catalytic oxidation of xylene, along with excellent performances in the cases of benzene, ethylbenzene, and toluene. Its catalytic activity increased in the order: . Furthermore, the addition of carbon monoxide (CO) as a coreactant permitted to improve the catalytic performances in such oxidations as well as the stability of as-prepared catalysts, even under humid conditions.

1. Introduction

Aromatic hydrocarbons involving benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) are air pollutants, mainly found in oil deposits and natural gas, or petroleum refining and petrochemical plants [1, 2]. Many serious health threats (nausea, headache, and fatigue) can be posed by exposure to BTEX for a long time [3]. Therefore, the elimination of BTEX is urgent, normally based on chemical reaction with chemical reagents, adsorption process using porous materials, and catalytic oxidation with a heterogeneous catalyst. In particular, catalytic oxidation processes have been delighted as the most important and up-and-coming technologies, due to the simple operation of equipment, the high removal efficiency, producing nontoxic products involving CO₂ and H₂O [4].

Commonly, the composites of CoO_x-CeO₂ exhibited excellent catalytic performances in low-temperature volatile organic compounds oxidation [5], CO oxidation [6], and N₂O decomposition [7]. Synergistic effect of CoO_x and CeO₂ on such processes has been illuminated, taking into account the oxygen mobility on the oxides surfaces and the oxygen storage capacity (OSC) of CeO₂ [8]. In comparison with expensive Pt-based catalysts, CoO_x displayed the equivalent catalytic activity. Besides, supported-CoO_x catalysts have been favored than nonsupported ones as the results of their sintering resistance as well as higher activity [9]. Recent efforts focused on CeO₂ support considering its high OSC [10], oxygen mobility [11], and acidic features [12]. Besides, the metal-support synergy based on CeO₂ support results in the high dispersion of CoO_x in their matrix.

The most frequently used method to synthesize CoO_x-CeO₂ composites is the aqueous impregnation of CeO₂ support in the aqueous solutions of cobalt salts. The metal site dispersion on CeO₂ determines both their activity and selectivity, prompting the development of synthetic methods based on different cobalt salts [13] involving cobalt(II) nitrate [14], cobalt(II) acetate [15], or organometallic cobalt-based complexes. Furthermore, the redox flexibility of CoO_x provoked by Co(III)/Co(II) couple plays a significant factor in controlling their oxidation catalytic activity [9, 16]. The reducing feature could be varied depending on metal precursor types, promoters, and supports [17]. According to our previous study, the Co₃O₄/CeO₂ catalyst coming from cobalt(II) acetate gave an excellent performance for -xylene oxidation [18]. As a part of catalyst characterization, the decrease of Co₃O₄ crystal size and the insertion of cobalt cations into CeO₂ lattice prompted increases of surface area and bulk lattice oxygen, as well as a drop of the reducing temperature. These features provided positive impacts on the remarkable catalytic performances of Co₃O₄-doped CeO₂.

In the catalytic oxidation processes of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and CO, water vapor (as an oxidation product or moisture in the gas) can influence on the reaction kinetics, leading to the interference on their reaction rate [19]. In fact, the surface OH^- groups can block active sites, as well as cutting off oxygen exchange at catalyst sites/support interfaces [20]. The surface OH^- groups formation was boosted by high concentrations of water vapor and oxygen [21]. Thus, the oxygen exchange capability of catalytic supports and the metal-support synergy should be governed with the aim of enhancing the VOC removal in the presence of water vapor. It was consistent with the abovementioned properties of CeO₂ and the synergistic effects of the CoO_x-CeO₂ mixed oxides.

In this study, the influences of cobalt contents on the physicochemical characteristics of CeO₂ nanoparticles-supported Co₃O₄ were investigated, shedding light on their catalytic activities towards the BTEX deep oxidation, in particular in the presence of CO and water vapor.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Catalyst Characteristics

Firstly, CeO₂ nanoparticles coming from Ce(NO₃)₃.6H₂O were prepared by hydrothermal approach [22], and then, a series of Co₃O₄ supported on CeO₂ nanoparticles were fabricated by the impregnation technique using cobalt(II) acetate as the cobalt precursor (with the contents of 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 wt.% Co₃O₄ symbolized as 2.5Co-Ce, 5.0Co-Ce, and 7.5Co-Ce), as previously reported by our group [18] (Experimental, in the Supplementary Information). The face-centered cubic crystalline structure of CeO₂ was characterized by XRD analysis and even preserved after loading of Co₃O₄ (Figure S1). However, the high dispersion of Co₃O₄ on the support interfered with the observation of their crystals for all the samples [12]. The oxidation states of the sample of 5.0 wt.% of Co₃O₄ supported on CeO₂ (5.0Co–Ce) were studied by XPS analysis (Figure 1) by reason of the highest catalytic activity (see the next section). A major peak of Co 2p3/2 was detected at 779.7 eV binding energy (Figure 1(a)) [23], and the corresponding Co²⁺/Co³⁺ ratio in the sample was estimated at 2.54. The Ce3d XPS spectra of the 5.0Co–Ce sample (Figure 1(b)) show the exclusive presence of Ce⁴⁺ species with six peaks at 881.7 eV (α), 888.3 eV (β), 897.6 eV (γ), 900.5 eV (α), 907.2 eV (β) and 916.4 eV (γ) [24]. In fact, the high binding energy (BE) doublet α/α corresponds to Ce(IV) 3d⁹4f²O2p⁴, doublet β/β is originated from Ce(IV) 3d⁹4f¹O2p⁵, and doublet (γ/γ) is associated to Ce(IV) 3d⁹4f⁰O2p⁶, whereas no Ce³⁺ species was detected [25].

(a)

(b)

(c)

The O 1 s spectra of the 5.0Co-Ce sample (Figure 1(c)) show the peaks at medium (531.3 eV) and high (528.9 eV) binding energies indicating adsorbed surface oxygen (O²⁻, O⁻, O₂²⁻) and lattice (O²⁻), respectively. A broad peak (533.3 eV) was observed due to the presence of the defective oxides or hydroxylated surface of the 5Co-Ce sample. This property confirmed the improvement of oxygen storage capacity and mobility provoked by the strong synergy between CeO₂ and Co₃O₄ [26].

The adsorption-desorption isotherms (Figure 2) revealed that both Co₃O₄-doped and undoped CeO₂ nanorods obey type IV isotherms (hysteresis loops at relative pressures greater than 0.5), confirming their mesoporous structures [27, 28]. The Barrett-Joyner-Hallenda (BJH) pore size distributions of ceria and Co-Ce samples (Figure 2) indicated their maximum pore diameters (more than 10 nm), in agreement with the mesopores of the samples. As clearly, the addition of cobalt in CeO₂ did not affect their pore size distributions.

The undoped ceria sample (Ce) exhibited a BET value of 43.3 m².g^-1, an average pore diameter of 23.8 Å, and a pore volume of 0.057 cm³.g^-1. The addition of CoO_x from 2.5 wt.% to 5.0 wt.% led to increasing the surface area of composites (48.5-51.0 m².g^-1) but decreasing applying the higher CoO_x loading (7.5 wt.% and 37.6 m².g^-1) (Figure 3), being consistent with the previous study [29]. The high surface area of Co-Ce composites may affect the BTEX oxidation activity, which depends on the number of active sites. The similarity was inspected for their pore volumes (see in Figure 4); meanwhile, the average pore diameters slightly decreased as adding CoO_x to ceria (23.0-23.6 Å).

The morphologies of samples (Figure S2) show that pure CeO₂ composed of homogeneous particles has a bigger size. CeO₂ crystals were highly minimized by CoO_x addition, particularly on the 5.0Co-Ce sample. In the Co-Ce samples, the highly dispersed CeO₂ could resist the sintering of CoO_x and thus improve their thermal stability [30]. Thus, the suitable content of CoO_x in the 5.0Co-Ce sample could increase its surface area. The microstructural characteristics of the 5.0Co-Ce sample were observed by HR-TEM analysis (Figure 5). The CeO₂ nanoparticles were 20-30 nm in diameter (being consistent with the previous SEM analysis), with (111), (200), and (220) crystal planes corresponding to the d-spacings of 0.27, 0.25, and 0.27 nm. Furthermore, Co₃O₄ nanocubes (the range size of 10-15 nm) were dispersed on CeO₂ nanoparticles, with the d-spacings of 0.15 and 0.16 nm assigned to (220) and (111) crystal planes of the Co₃O₄ phase.

The FT-IR spectrum of CeO₂ exhibited the presence of absorption bands at 450 cm^-1, 1630 cm^-1, and 3430 cm^-1 (broad) attributed to CeO₂ stretching, the molecular H₂O bending [31], and the O-H stretching vibrations of hydroxyl functional groups [32], respectively (Figure 6). The absorption characteristics were not different after loading Co₃O₄ on CeO₂. However, the FT-IR spectra of Co₃O₄-CeO₂ nanocomposites showed the higher signal intensities, proving that CoO_x crystals are inserted into CeO₂ lattice and highly dispersed on CeO₂ supports. In particular, the 5.0Co-Ce sample showed the highest peak intensity and thus the superior catalytic activity in BTEX deep oxidation (see the next section).

The O₂-TPD profiles of Co-Ce samples (Figure 7) indicated the oxygen desorption bands attributed to different oxygen species: surface-active oxygen (<350°C), surface lattice oxygen (350-500°C), and bulk phase lattice oxygen (>500°C) [33]. With the undoped CeO₂, two desorption peaks of surface adsorbed oxygen species at low temperatures (<350°C) were detected. Meanwhile, when Co₃O₄ was added to CeO₂ (2.5-5.0 wt.%), the more oxygen desorption peaks appeared and shifted to higher temperatures, indicating an obvious growth of O₂ adsorption capacity. By the increase of Co₃O₄ concentration (7.5 wt.%), the area of the peaks decreased, pointing out the difficulties in producing surface-active oxygen applying the higher CoO_x contents. In this study, the 5.0Co-Ce catalyst gave the highest surface-active oxygen production, suggesting the better O₂ adsorption [34], being essential for their remarkable catalytic activity in BTEX deep oxidation.

The H₂-TPR profile of CeO₂ (Figure 8) displayed the weak and broad peaks at 400°C and 800°C, representing the reductions of surface and subsurface oxygen of ceria, respectively. On the Co-Ce nanocomposites, three reduction bands were detected at much lower temperatures with higher intensities in comparison with the pure ceria. The first peak at 200-320°C was contributed by the reduction from Co³⁺ to Co²⁺ and/or Co²⁺ to Co⁰, the second peak with low intensity at 350-450°C was attributed to characteristic for Co₃O₄ bounded to CeO₂, and the third broad peak at 750-850°C was associated to the reduction of ceria subsurface oxygen [6, 35]. The ceria reducibility was enhanced with the assistance of Co₃O₄, because of a hydrogen spillover from cobalt to ceria. In which, the 5.0Co-Ce sample showed the highest reduction peaks at lower temperature range, accordingly being more easily reduced and the highest consumption of hydrogen. The results evidenced that the well-dispersed CeO₂ across the Co-Ce nanocomposites boosted the synergistic effect between CeO₂ and Co₃O₄, facilitating the active oxygen reproduction and thus improving the catalytic activity.

2.2. Catalytic Activity

Effect of cobalt contents on the catalytic activity in -xylene oxidation (Figure 9) showed that the low conversions were achieved using the pure CeO₂ catalyst in the temperature range from 225 to 300°C (59.7% conversion at 300°C). On the other hand, the cobalt addition into the catalytic systems tremendously improved the catalytic performance. For all Co-Ce samples, the higher the reaction temperatures were, the higher the -xylene conversions were. Generally, they reached over 85% conversions at 285°C and the 5.0Co-Ce sample was the most efficient (92.6% conversion at 285°C). These results are quite consistent with the previous catalyst characterization of the 5.0Co-Ce sample (5.0 wt.% Co₃O₄) involving the smallest particle size, remarkable specific surface area, the most easily reduced catalyst, and the highest strength of the bonds on the surface.

The catalytic activity of the best system (5.0Co-Ce) in BTEX oxidation (Figure 10) indicated the increase of its catalytic activity following the order: . In fact, the treatment efficiency of aromatic compounds mainly depends on the adsorption strength of aromatic hydrocarbons, the C-H strength, and the ionization potential of methyl derivatives. In which, it reached 100, 98, 92, and 75% conversions corresponding to toluene, ethylbenzene, -xylene, and benzene at 285°C. Balzer and coworkers reported Co₂O₃ (20 wt.%) catalysts supported on CeO₂+γ-Al₂O₃ towards VOC oxidation involving -hexane (96% conversion), benzene (90% conversion), toluene (70% conversion), and -xylene (58% conversion) at 350°C [36]. Meanwhile, 20 wt.% Co₂O₃/γ-Al₂O₃-undoped CeO₂ achieved only 50%, 45%, 35%, and 25% conversions under the similar conditions. Wu and coworkers synthesized supported Au catalyst (1.5 wt.%) applied in -xylene oxidation [37], reaching 30%, 14%, and 9% conversions at 300°C on Au/ZnO, Au/Al₂O₃, and Au/MgO catalysts, respectively. In comparison to the catalytic activities as abovementioned, the 5.0Co-Ce catalyst gave a better catalytic performance, rising the efficient catalytic systems towards the BTEX oxidation.

The catalytic performances of the 5.0Co-Ce sample for -xylene in the absence and presence of CO, the single CO oxidation are shown in Figure 11. The complete CO conversion in both cases was below 275°C. In the assistance of CO, an increase of the catalytic performance in -xylene oxidation was observed. The exothermicity of the CO oxidation was the cause of enhanced activity (enthalpy of the reaction of CO oxidation: ) [38]. The oxidation of CO to CO₂ was completed when -xylene oxidation began. The CO oxidation can locally raise the temperature of the catalyst bed and permit to activate the p-xylene oxidation.

The stability of the 5Co-Ce sample in the -xylene oxidation was examined in the presence of water vapor (Figure 12). Clearly, in the case of CO and water vapor, the -xylene conversion remained stable after 360 minutes () with various contents of water vapor (1.1-3.2 mol%). Meanwhile, without CO, the -xylene conversion decreased applying the increase of water vapor concentration (82.4% conversion without water vapor vs. 59.1% conversion in the case of steam rising to 3.2 mol% at 275°C for 360 mins). However, when the water vapor was turned off, the xylene conversion increased significantly, from 59.1% to 78.5% in 480 mins. These results proved that the adsorbed steam only competes with the reactants, leading to inhibiting the catalytic activity but not poisoning the catalytic sites. In fact, the Co-Ce catalyst system is still highly durable upon the time, proving that the addition of CO in -xylene vapor enhances both catalytic reactivity and stability.

3. Conclusion

The CoO_x-CeO₂ nanocomposites showed better catalytic activity in the BTEX oxidation reaction compared to the pure CeO₂. The phase synergy between CoO_x and CeO₂ contributed to their activity improvement. The 5.0Co-Ce sample exhibited the highest catalytic performance towards BTEX oxidation, reaching 100% (toluene), 98% (ethylbenzene), 92% (-xylene), and 75% (benzene) conversions at 285°C. In contrast, the pure CeO₂ showed a low -xylene conversion (43.5% at 285°C). The presence of CO improved -xylene oxidation on the 5Co-Ce catalyst owing to the exothermicity from CO oxidation, increasing the temperature of the catalyst bed, and thus activating the -xylene oxidation. Besides, the catalyst stability upon the time in such a reaction was evidenced by the addition of CO, in the assistance of water vapor. This research demonstrated the catalytic efficiency of cobalt-doped ceria nanoparticles in aromatic hydrocarbons oxidations in association with CO and humidity.

Data Availability

The experimental data used to support the findings are included as the supplementary data within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of time and facilities from Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), VNU-HCM for this study.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1: XRD patterns of Co-Ce samples. Figure S2: SEM images of samples. (a) Ce. (b) 2.5Co-Ce. (c) 5.0Co-Ce. (d) 7.5Co-Ce. (Supplementary Materials)

References

R. Tong, Y. Yang, G. Shao, Y. Zhang, S. Dou, and W. Jiang, “Emission sources and probabilistic health risk of volatile organic compounds emitted from production areas in a petrochemical refinery in Hainan, China,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, vol. 26, pp. 1–21, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Roy, L. Haak, L. Li, and K. Pagilla, “Anaerobic digestion for solids reduction and detoxification of refinery waste streams,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 1552–1560, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Snyder, “Experimental benzene toxicity,” in Benzene carcinogenicity, pp. 23–32, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Ren, Z. Feng, S. Mo et al., “1D-Co₃O₄, 2D-Co₃O₄, 3D-Co₃O₄ for catalytic oxidation of toluene,” Catal Today, vol. 332, pp. 160–167, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Colman-Lerner, M. A. Peluso, J. Sambeth, and H. Thomas, “Cerium, manganese and cerium/manganese ceramic monolithic catalysts. Study of VOCs and PM removal,” Journal of Rare Earths, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 675–682, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-Y. Luo, M. Meng, X. Li et al., “Mesoporous Co₃O₄-CeO₂ and Pd/Co₃O₄-CeO₂ catalysts: synthesis, characterization and mechanistic study of their catalytic properties for low-temperature CO oxidation,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 254, no. 2, pp. 310–324, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Iwanek, K. Krawczyk, J. Petryk, J. W. Sobczak, and Z. Kaszkur, “Direct nitrous oxide decomposition with CoO_x-CeO₂ catalysts,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 106, no. 3-4, pp. 416–422, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Porsin, E. Alikin, and V. Bukhtiyarov, “A low-temperature method for measuring oxygen storage capacity of ceria-containing oxides,” Catalysis Science & Technology, vol. 6, no. 15, pp. 5891–5898, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Yin, Y. Liu, Q. Xia et al., “Oxygen vacancy-rich nitrogen-doped Co₃O₄ nanosheets as an efficient water-resistant catalyst for low temperature CO oxidation,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 553, pp. 427–435, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Lu, S. Asahina, S. Takami et al., “Interconnected 3D framework of CeO₂ with high oxygen storage capacity: high-resolution scanning electron microscopic observation,” ACS Applied Nano Materials, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 2346–2353, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Lin, S. Li, H. He et al., “Evolution of oxygen vacancies in MnO_x-CeO₂ mixed oxides for soot oxidation,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 223, pp. 91–102, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Mei, Y. Ke, Z. Yu, X. Hu, Z. Qu, and N. Yan, “Morphology-dependent properties of Co₃O₄/CeO₂ catalysts for low temperature dibromomethane (CH₂Br₂) oxidation,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 320, pp. 124–134, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Niemelä, A. Krause, T. Vaara, J. Kiviaho, and M. Reinikainen, “The effect of the precursor on the characteristics of Co/SiO₂ catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 325–345, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Dou, Y. Tang, L. Nie et al., “Complete oxidation of methane on Co₃O₄/CeO₂ nanocomposite: a synergic effect,” Catal Today, vol. 311, pp. 48–55, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Wei, X. Dong, M. Ma et al., “Co₃O₄ hollow fiber: an efficient catalyst precursor for hydrolysis of sodium borohydride to generate hydrogen,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 1529–1533, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Fan, W. Fang, Z. Zhang, M. Chen, and W. Shangguan, “Highly active rod-like Co₃O₄ catalyst for the formaldehyde oxidation reaction,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 103, pp. 10–14, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Waikar, H. Pawar, and P. More, “Review on CO oxidation by noble and non-noble metal based catalyst,” Catalysis in Green Chemistry and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 11–24, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Dang-Bao, N. P. Anh, P. H. Phuong et al., “Fabrication of cobalt-doped ceria nanorods for p-xylene deep oxidation: effects of cobalt precursor and loading,” Materials Transactions, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 1294–1300, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Bae, J. B. Ko, and D. H. Kim, “Selective catalytic oxidation of carbon monoxide with carbon dioxide, water vapor and excess hydrogen on CuO–CeO₂ mixed oxide catalysts,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 507–511, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Dongsheng, L. Guanzhong, G. Yun, W. Yanqin, and G. Yanglong, “Effect of water vapor on the CO and CH₄ catalytic oxidation over CeO₂-MO_x (M= Cu, Mn, Fe, Co, and Ni) mixed oxide,” Journal of Rare Earths, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 742–746, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Friberg, N. Sadokhina, and L. Olsson, “Complete methane oxidation over Ba modified Pd/Al₂O₃: the effect of water vapor,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 231, pp. 242–250, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Peng, X. Sun, S. Li et al., “Shape effect of Pt/CeO₂ catalysts on the catalytic oxidation of toluene,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 306, pp. 1234–1246, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Chen, S. Li, L. Ma, X. Zhao, and G. Fang, “Aldehyde reduced Co₃O₄ to form oxygen vacancy and enhance the electrochemical performance for oxygen evolution reaction and supercapacitor,” Nanotechnology, vol. 30, no. 39, article 395403, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Liu, C. Ma, Q. Zhang et al., “2D electron gas and oxygen vacancy induced high oxygen evolution performances for advanced Co₃O₄/CeO₂ nanohybrids,” Advanced Materials, vol. 31, no. 21, article 1900062, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Bêche, P. Charvin, D. Perarnau, S. Abanades, and G. Flamant, “Ce 3d XPS investigation of cerium oxides and mixed cerium oxide (Ce_xTi_yO_z),” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 40, no. 3-4, pp. 264–267, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Tang, X. Wu, D. Li et al., “Oxalate route for promoting activity of manganese oxide catalysts in total VOCs’ oxidation: effect of calcination temperature and preparation method,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 2544–2554, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, H. Liu, Y. Chen, and S. Yang, “Reverse water–gas shift reaction over co-precipitated Co–CeO₂ catalysts: effect of Co content on selectivity and carbon formation,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 3682–3689, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Tan, Q. Tao, H. Gao, J. Li, D. Jia, and M. Yang, “Preparation and catalytic performance of mesoporous ceria-base composites CuO/CeO₂, Fe₂O₃/CeO₂ and La₂O₃/CeO₂,” Journal of Porous Materials, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 795–803, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Xue, C. Zhang, H. He, and Y. Teraoka, “Catalytic decomposition of N₂O over CeO₂ promoted Co₃O₄ spinel catalyst,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 75, no. 3-4, pp. 167–174, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Kumar, M. D. Tanwar, N. Russo, R. Pirone, and D. Fino, “Synthesis and catalytic properties of CeO₂ and Co/CeO₂ nanofibres for diesel soot combustion,” Catalysis Today, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 279–287, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Mokkelbost, I. Kaus, T. Grande, and M.-A. Einarsrud, “Combustion synthesis and characterization of nanocrystalline CeO₂-based powders,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 16, no. 25, pp. 5489–5494, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Pautrot-d’Alençon, P. Barboux, and J.-P. Boilot, “Synthesis and acid functionalization of cerium oxide nanoparticles,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 261–267, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Liu, Y. Liu, C. Li et al., “Three-dimensionally ordered macroporous Au/CeO2-Co3O4 catalysts with nanoporous walls for enhanced catalytic oxidation of formaldehyde,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 127, pp. 47–58, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Chen, D. Liu, L. Yang et al., “Ternary composite oxide catalysts CuO/Co₃O₄–CeO₂ with wide temperature-window for the preferential oxidation of CO in H₂-rich stream,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 234, pp. 88–98, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Liotta, G. Di Carlo, G. Pantaleo, A. Venezia, and G. Deganello, “Co₃O₄/CeO₂ composite oxides for methane emissions abatement: Relationship between Co₃O₄-CeO₂ interaction and catalytic activity,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 66, no. 3-4, pp. 217–227, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Balzer, L. F. D. Probst, V. Drago, W. Schreiner, and H. V. Fajardo, “Catalytic oxidation of volatile organic compounds (n-hexane, benzene, toluene, o-xylene) promoted by cobalt catalysts supported on γ-Al₂O₃-CeO₂,” Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 757–769, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wu, L. Wang, J. Zhang, Z. Shen, and J. Zhao, “Catalytic oxidation of benzene, toluene and p-xylene over colloidal gold supported on zinc oxide catalyst,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 859–865, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Genty, J. Brunet, C. Poupin, S. Ojala, S. Siffert, and R. Cousin, “Influence of CO addition on the toluene total oxidation over Co based mixed oxide catalysts,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 247, pp. 163–172, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Trung Dang-Bao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

721

Downloads

638

Citations