Cucurbitacin B as a Chinese Medicine Monomer Inhibits Cell Proliferation, Invasion, and Migration in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Xu, Ning; Zhang, Bei-Bei; Yang, Meng-Zhe; Bai, Xian-Yu; Liang, Zhen-Qiang; Cheng, Nan-Nan; Lv, An-Qiao; Yang, Jian-Yu; Guo, Xing-Zhe; Jiao, Ai-Jun; Huang, Yuan-Jiao

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5596780

Journal of Nanomaterials

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Novel Micro- and Nanomaterials for Pharmaceutical Applications

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 5596780 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5596780

Cucurbitacin B as a Chinese Medicine Monomer Inhibits Cell Proliferation, Invasion, and Migration in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Ning Xu,¹Bei-Bei Zhang,²Meng-Zhe Yang,¹Xian-Yu Bai,¹Zhen-Qiang Liang,³Nan-Nan Cheng,¹An-Qiao Lv,¹Jian-Yu Yang,¹Xing-Zhe Guo,¹Ai-Jun Jiao,⁴and Yuan-Jiao Huang^5,6

Academic Editor: Songwen Tan

Received22 Jan 2021

Revised19 Feb 2021

Accepted23 Feb 2021

Published12 Mar 2021

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignant epithelial tumor in southern China. Cucurbitacin B (CuB) is a tetracyclic triterpene compound isolated from Cucurbitaceae plants which has anti-inflammation and antitumor properties and low toxic side effects. In this study, we use a series of wet experiments and network pharmacology analyses to explore the effects of CuB on cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and apoptosis of highly metastatic 5-8F NPC cells. The findings suggest that CuB inhibits NPC cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner and that cancer migration and invasion abilities decrease significantly after CuB treatments. Mechanistically, CuB could increase the proportion of cells in the G2/M phase and reduce it in the G0/G1 phase, leading to apoptosis. The network pharmacological analyses and wet experiments uncovered that the MAPK pathway is a central target by pathway enrichment analysis, affecting the fate of cancer cells and influencing proliferation and apoptosis. Taken together, our study reveals that CuB could effectively inhibit 5-8F NPC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion via cell cycle blockage and cell apoptosis. Collectively, we have shown that CuB is a promising anti-NPC candidate compound for future preclinical study.

1. Introduction

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is the most common malignant tumor of the nasopharynx. Although global NPC incidence is less than 1/100,000, there are significant regional variations and a much higher incidence rate in North Africa and Southeast Asia, especially in the southern provinces of China. In 2018, there were 129,079 new NPC cases and 72,987 deaths around the world. Of these, more than 45% of the new cases were in China, several times higher than the global average incidence rate, and in some provinces, the rate exceeded 30/100,000 [1, 2]. There are a number of pathological forms including the undifferentiated state [3], the hidden onset, mostly lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis [4–6]. With the development of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment, patients with early stage NPC (stage I) who underwent radiation therapy alone experienced a 5-year survival rate (OS) of over 90% [7, 8]. High survival rates are also seen in patients with stage II cancer who underwent radiotherapy alone, but 10-15% of patients develop recurrence and distant metastasis [9]. Combined chemotherapy can improve patient survival rate and reduce the rate of recurrence and metastasis, but the toxicity and side effects of chemotherapy drugs seem to do more harm than good [10, 11]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to seek safe and effective radiotherapy adjuvant drugs with low toxicity and side effects which will help to reduce the recurrence and distant metastasis.

A number of studies have shown that many active components in Chinese herbal medicine have antitumor effects and that they are economical and multitarget, have low toxicity and side effects and, as such, are a current focus of antitumor drug research. Cucurbitacin is one of the main bioactive compounds found in Cucurbitaceae, such as cucumber [12]. It has been extracted from a variety of plants, has a wide range of pharmacological activities [13], such as cytotoxic, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer effects [14], and has been used as folk medicine for hundreds of years in countries such as India and China. Among the Cucurbitacin compounds, Cucurbitacin B (CuB) is one of the most widely used active substances for in vivo and in vitro tumor inhibition studies. With low toxicity and side effects, it is a promising potential antitumor herbal drug [15]; however, no studies have been conducted on its effect on NPC.

In this study, we examined the effect of CuB on the highly metastatic NPC 5-8F cells and reveal its possible mechanism of action using in vitro wet experiments and bioinformatics analyses. Our findings suggest that CuB could effectively inhibit 5-8F cell proliferation, migration, and invasion via cell cycle blockage and apoptosis. The network pharmacological analyses uncover that the MAPK pathway is a central target. Our findings show that CuB is a promising anti-NPC candidate compound and should be the focus of future research.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Materials

5-8F cells were purchased from Shanghai Institute of Cell Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences. CuB was purchased from MCE (United States). 1640 medium and FBS fetal bovine serum were purchased from Gibco (USA), Trypsin solution and DMSO were purchased from Amresco (USA), and BCA Protein Content Assay Kit and AnnexinV-FITC Apoptosis Assay Kit were purchased from Nanjing Kaiji Biotechnology Co., Ltd. CCK-8 reagent was purchased from Dojindo (Japan).

2.2. Cell Culture

NPC 5-8F cells were cultured in RPM-1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum at 37°C and 5% carbon dioxide. The medium was changed daily, and the cells were isolated with 0.25% trypsin.

2.3. CCK-8 Assay

Cells were seeded into 96-well plates and cultured for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cytotoxicity was detected by the CCK method. Absorbance at 450 nm was measured by an automatic enzyme plate reader (Bio-Tek, VT, USA). Cell mortality was calculated according to the following formula: . Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

2.4. Transwell Migration and Invasion Assay

5-8F cells in each group were resuspended in serum-free medium and a cell suspension was prepared. A Transwell chamber was inoculated with 200 μL cell suspension in the upper chamber and 600 μL serum-free medium in the lower chamber. The cells were incubated at 37°C for 24 h, and after which, sterile cotton swabs were used to remove the upper 5-8F cells and were thoroughly washed in PBS. The cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and stained in 0.1% crystal violet for 10 min. Three fields were randomly selected under the microscope for photography, and the number of stained cells in crystal violet was calculated as the number of migrated cells. For the invasion assay, RPMI 1640 medium was added at a ratio of 1 : 5 to Matrigel, and the upper chamber of Transwell was coated. After drying, the same protocol as the cell migration assay above was performed, and the number of invading cells was counted.

2.5. Flow Cytometry Analysis of Apoptosis

The Annexin V-FITC double-staining method was used to detect the effect of CuB on 5-8F cell apoptosis. cells were seeded into each well of a six-well plate, and different CuB concentrations (0, 200, 400, and 800 nM) were added after the cells adhered to the wall. Cells were incubated for 48 h, then harvested, resuspended in cold PBS, and stained with the Annexin-FITC apoptosis detection kit according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Cell apoptosis was then analyzed by flow cytometry. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

2.6. Flow Cytometry Analysis of Cell Cycle

5-8F cells in the logarithmic growth stage were seeded into 6-well plates, with a total volume of each well of 2 mL and cell density of cells/L. After the cells were treated with CuB at final concentrations of 0, 200, 400, and 800 nM for 48 h, they were collected, rinsed twice with 0.01 mol/L PBS () for precooling, and fixed overnight with 75% cold ethanol at 4°C. Before detection, the fixation solution was removed and propidium iodide (PI) was added and the samples stained at 4°C for 30 min. cells from each group were collected for flow cytometry detection. The MFLT SAAINC software was used to analyze the cell cycle phase ratio and early cell apoptosis rate. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

2.7. Bioinformatics Analysis

The PubChem database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) was used to find the 3D compound structure of CuB, the PharmMapper database (http://www.lilab-ecust.cn/pharmmapper) was used to obtain CuB targets, and the GeneCards (http://www.genecards.org) database was used to retrieve target NPC-related diseases. The online tools from (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn) were used to make maps of NPC and CuB targets. The PPI analysis of protein interactions was performed using String (https://string-db.org/cgi). The Cytoscape 3.6.1 software was used to construct the CUB-nasopharyngeal carcinoma target network map, and cytoHubba’s MCC method was used to search for core genes. The David web site (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) was used for GO enrichment analysis on the common targets and the Kobas online database (http://kobas.cbi.pku.edu.cn/kobas3) was used for KEGG pathway enrichment analysis.

2.8. Western Blot

Total protein (40 μg) generated by cell lysis was separated on a 12% acrylamide gel (80 V, 30 min; 120 V, 60 min), then transferred to PVDF membrane (270 mA, 65 min), blocked with 5% skim milk for 1 h, washed three times with 0.1% TBST, and incubated in the primary antibody overnight at 4°C. The membrane was then washed three times with TBST, 5 min each, and then incubated with diluted fluorescent secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody for 1 h. The membrane was washed three times in TBST, 5 min each, and the Odyssey infrared fluorescence film scanner was used to sweep the film, adjust the required parameters, and save the picture. The antibodies used in this study were GADPH (Wuhan ProteinTech Company (China)), P-ERK and ERK (ABCAM (USA)), and BCL2 and BAX (Cell Signaling Technology (USA)). All the images were analyzed with ImageJ to calculate the gray value of the relevant target proteins.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

SPSS 25.0 was used for all statistical analysis. Measurement data was expressed as . A -test was used for the comparison of two sample means, and one-way analysis of variance was used for comparison of means between groups. A value < 0.05 indicates statistical significance. For all the data presented in this study, represents , represents , and represents . All experiments were repeated three times.

3. Results

3.1. CuB Inhibits NPC Proliferation

To explore the anticancer effects of CuB, we cultured 5-8F NPC cells (a highly metastatic cell line). The CCK8 assay results showed that CuB had a concentration-time-dependent effect on NPC 5-8F cell proliferation (Figure 1). In detail, the inhibition rate of cell proliferation was , , , , () for 24 h CuB treatment at 200 nM, 400 nM, 600 nM, 800 nM, and 1000 nM, respectively. Similarly, the cell proliferation inhibition rate was , , , , and () for 48 h CuB treatment at 200 nM, 400 nM, 600 nM, 800 nM, and 1000 nM, respectively. Accordingly, the cell proliferation inhibition rate was , , , , and (IC₅₀ was ) for 72 h CuB treatment at 200 nM, 400 nM, 600 nM, 800 nM, and 1000 nM, respectively. Collectively, CuB could obviously inhibit cell proliferation in the highly metastatic cell line model.

3.2. CuB Suppresses Cell Migration and Invasion in NPC

Since 5-8F is a highly metastatic cell line and metastasis is a clinical concern that needs to be addressed, we examined whether CuB has some effects on cell abilities such as migration and invasion. The results of the scratch experiment (Figure 2) showed that the migration rates of 5-8F cells were , , and at 24 h and , , and at 48 h after treatment with CuB at 50, 100, and 200 nM, respectively. Compared to the control group (24 h, ; 48 h, ), 50 nM CuB could significantly inhibit NPC 5-8F cells migration (), and the inhibition of 5-8F migration was positively correlated with concentration.

To further validate these observations, Transwell migration experiments were performed. The results showed that the number of transmembrane cells in control and CuB treatment groups (50 nM, 100 nM, and 200 nM) was , , , and , respectively. Similarly, the Transwell-invasion experiment showed that the number of transmembrane cells in the control group and the CuB treatment groups (50 nM, 100 nM, and 200 nM) was , , , and , respectively. These results showed that as the CuB concentration increased, the migration and invasion ability of 5-8F cells decreased significantly () (Figure 3). These results showed that CuB had some effect on metastatic abilities, such as migration and invasion, in NPC.

3.3. CuB Induces Cell Apoptosis in NPC

After seeing that cell proliferation, migration, and invasion were all significantly inhibited, we next explored whether CuB could affect NPC cell fate. Flow cytometry showed that after 48 h treatment with CuB at 200, 400, and 800 nM, the apoptosis rates were , , and , respectively. Compared with the control group (), the apoptosis rate was significantly increased and was correlated with concentration () (Figure 4). These data suggest that CuB could induce cell apoptosis in NPC and that this is closely related to drug concentration.

3.4. CuB Induces G2/M Phase Blockade in the Cell Cycle of NPC

We further examined the cell cycle to uncover the mechanism of action of CuB. Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycle showed that in 5-8F treated with CuB at 200, 400, and 800 nM, the proportion of G2 phase cells increased , , and , respectively, while the proportion of G0/G1 phase cells decreased, , , and , respectively, compared with the control group (G2, , and G0/G1, ) (Figure 5). These results indicate that CuB could induce G2/M phase blockade in the NPC cell cycle.

3.5. Bioinformatics Analysis Uncovers MAPK as the Main Target of CuB

To explore the overall anticancer effects of CuB against NPC, we performed bioinformatics analysis using a network pharmacology approach. In total, 357 CuB action targets were obtained from the PharmMapper database and 1786 target genes from the GeneCards database. Among them, 116 common targets were validated (Figure 6(a)). The PPI analysis showed that MAPK1 was the most correlated gene among all the target genes, with a total of 30 interrelated genes (Figures 6(b) and 6(c)). MCC analysis of the common target genes with the Cytoscape plug-in showed that MAPK1 had the highest score (Figure 6(d)). Using as the threshold, 119 terms were obtained by GO enrichment analysis, of which, MAPK1 played a role in 28 terms and participated in three functions: BP, CC, and MF (Figure 6(e) shows the three functions of MAPK1 with the top 5 terms). The 28 functions in which MAPK1 is involved are shown in Figure 6(f). Using as the threshold, MAPK1 (ranked by value) was involved in 101 of the 159 pathways identified by the KEGG enrichment analysis. Figure 6(g) shows the MAPK1 position in the ranking by value of the top 15 pathways. MAPK1 mainly participates in biological processes through the MAPK pathway, and Figure 6(h) shows all the common target genes enriched in the MAPK pathway. Western blotting showed that the phosphorylation level of ERK (downstream of the MAPK pathway) decreased in a dose-dependent manner after CuB treatment (Figures 7(a) and 7(b)). After CuB treatment, levels of the proapoptotic protein Bax increased and of the apoptosis regulator Bcl-2 decreased (Figures 7(a) and 7(b)). Overall, the bioinformatics analysis and wet experiments show that MAPK is the central target of CuB against NPC.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

Figure 6

Bioinformatics analysis uncovers MAPK as the central target of CuB. (a) Venn diagram of NPC therapeutic targets in the GeneCards database and CuB therapeutic targets in the PharmMapper database. (b, c) PPI analysis showing that MAPK1 had the strongest interaction with the other proteins. (d) MCC calculation concluded that MAPK1 has the highest score and is the core gene of the common target genes. (e) GO enrichment analysis of the top 5 functional sets of BF, CC, and MF. (f) The functional set in which MAPK1 was involved as the core. (g) The KEGG analysis of the screened common target genes (top 15 pathway). (h) Genes enriched in the MAPK pathway.

4. Discussion

Previous studies have shown that there is no obvious toxicity to normal cells at CuB concentrations lower than 5-10 μM [16]. Wakimoto et al. showed that when nude mice transplanted with MD-MB-231 tumor cells were injected with CuB (1 mg/kg) intraperitoneally for 6 weeks, the tumor volume reduced by 55% compared to the control group while body weight did not reduce [17]. At present, no national food and drug administration has included CuB in the list of drugs or harmful substances [18]. The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration has approved unrestricted use of CuB and encourages its use in combination with other drugs [19], and China has developed calabash tablets, 60 percent of the active ingredient is CuB, which are used in the adjuvant treatment of hepatitis and primary liver cancer with the main side effect being mild gastrointestinal reactions. These studies confirm that CuB should be considered safe within therapeutic concentration ranges. In this study, when incubated with 5-8F cells for 24, 48, and 72 h, the IC50 of CuB was , , and , respectively. Overall, this information suggests that CuB has obvious anti-NPC potential at safe dosage levels.

Studies have shown that CuB can inhibit the invasion and migration of a variety of tumor cells, but the specific mechanism remains unclear. Promkan et al. found that CuB could effectively inhibit the invasion and migration of BRCA1 defective breast cancer cells [20], and Liang et al. showed that it could destroy the cytoskeleton of breast cancer cells, altering their biomechanical properties, and inhibiting their migration and invasion [21]. In non-small cell lung cancer, Garg et al. found that CuB inhibited cell invasion and migration by decreasing mortalin, hnRNP-K, vascular endothelial growth factor, matrix metalloproteinase 2, and fibronectin [22], and Piao et al. found that CuB could inhibit tumor invasion and migration by inhibiting tumor cell angiogenesis [23]. In this study, we showed that CuB could also inhibit invasion and migration of NPC 5-8F cells, which is consistent with the results of previous studies.

Numerous studies have shown that CuB can inhibit the growth of many human cancer cells, including breast [24, 25], prostate [26], lung [27], ovarian [28], liver [29], pancreatic [30], larynx [31], kidney [32], and skin cancer [33]. Although many studies have demonstrated the anticancer activity of CuB, the mechanism of its action is still unclear. It has been reported that CuB inhibits the growth of tumor cells and induces apoptosis by inhibiting the activation of signal transduction and transcriptional activator 3 (STAT3) and regulating its downstream genes such as cyclin D1, cyclin D2, and apoptosis-related genes like Bcl-2 and Bax [34, 35]. In this study, we found that MAPK1 is one of the most important targets of CuB through network pharmacology analysis.

Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) are the largest subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases and are involved in many signal transduction pathways and play important roles in protein renewal, cell growth, transcription factor activation, chromatin modification, and gene expression. The MAPK pathway is a well-known stress sensing signal transduction pathway, which can respond to extra- and intracellular stress signals and transmit environmental and self-derived signals into cells. Relevant studies have indicated that CuB is an inhibitor of JAK-STAT3, Wnt, PI3K/Akt, and MAPK signaling pathways, which play an important role in apoptosis and survival of cancer cells [36].

In human chronic myelogenous leukemia studies, CuB inhibited MAPK/ERK pathway activation in various human chronic myelogenous leukemia cells and inhibited STAT3 activation [37]. The analysis in this study showed that there was inhibition of MAPK/ERK activation, which led to the arrest of the G2/M cell cycle and apoptosis. Silva et al. reported that CuB can inhibit PI3 kinase and MAPK pathways, delay cell migration, and reduce cellular invasive potential [38]. It could also induce dose- and time-dependent apoptosis, inhibit MMP release and FAK activation, and downregulate Akt, ERK, and NF-κBp65 phosphorylation. Zhang et al. found CuB had anticancer effects in the SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell line [39]. CuB induced G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. This was accompanied by downregulation of CDK1 and cyclin B1, essential proteins in the cell cycle process. Another study has also reported that CuB inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of human osteosarcoma cells by regulating the JAK2/STAT3 and MAPK pathways [40]. In this study, MTT and Annexin V/propidium iodide staining showed that CuB (20-100 μM dose) significantly reduced cell viability and induced apoptosis and inhibited cell migration. In conclusion, CuB’s antitumor effect is mainly attributed to its induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. The underlying mechanism of action may be attributed to the changes in key proteins involved in the regulation of cell cycle or apoptosis.

In conclusion, our study has shown that the Chinese medicine monomer CuB is a promising anticancer compound which affects cell proliferation, invasion, and migration in NPC cells. Mechanistically, its anticancer effects involve the cell cycle blockade and cell apoptosis, mediated through the MAPK signaling pathway. This shows that CuB is a promising agent for future NPC preclinical research and that this study also provides evidence that it might become part of a useful cancer therapy strategy.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on the reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, either in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis, or interpretation. Ning Xu, Bei-Bei Zhang, and Meng-Zhe Yang contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Project for Department of Science and Technology of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China (grant number Guike AB19110052), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi, China (grant number 2015GXNSFAA139215), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 81260405).

References

F. Bray, J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, R. L. Siegel, L. A. Torre, and A. Jemal, “Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,” CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 394–424, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chen, J. Qi, B. Yu et al., “A retrospective study to compare five induction chemotherapy regimens prior to radiotherapy in the reduction of regional lymph node size in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 24, pp. 2562–2568, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. K. Chua, J. T. S. Wee, E. P. Hui, and A. T. C. Chan, “Nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” Lancet, vol. 387, no. 10022, pp. 1012–1024, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. P. Mao, F. Y. Xie, L. Z. Liu et al., “Re-evaluation of 6th edition of AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and proposed improvement based on magnetic resonance imaging,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 1326–1334, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Palazzi, E. Orlandi, P. Bossi et al., “Further improvement in outcomes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with optimized radiotherapy and induction plus concomitant chemotherapy: an update of the Milan experience,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 774–780, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G.-Y. Liu, X. Lv, Y.-S. Wu et al., “Effect of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, with or without taxane on locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis,” Cancer Communications, vol. 38, no. 1, p. 21, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. W. M. Lee, W. M. Sze, J. S. K. Au et al., “Treatment results for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the modern era: the Hong Kong experience,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1107–1116, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Lee, J. Harris, A. S. Garden et al., “Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: radiation therapy oncology group phase II trial 0225,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 27, no. 22, pp. 3684–3690, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Hu, Q. Huang, J. Gao et al., “Clinical outcomes of carbon-ion radiotherapy for patients with locoregionally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” Cancer, vol. 126, no. 23, pp. 5173–5183, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Zhang, Y. Zhang, W. F. Li et al., “Efficacy of Concurrent Chemotherapy for Intermediate Risk NPC in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Era: a Propensity-Matched Analysis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 17378, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Xu, L. H. Zhang, Y. P. Chen et al., “Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systemic review and meta-analysis of 2138 patients,” Journal of Cancer, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 287–297, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. K. Mukherjee, N. K. Nema, N. Maity, and B. K. Sarkar, “Phytochemical and therapeutic potential of cucumber,” Fitoterapia, vol. 84, pp. 227–236, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Chen, M. H. Chiu, R. L. Nie, G. A. Cordell, and S. X. Qiu, “Cucurbitacins and cucurbitane glycosides: structures and biological activities,” Natural Product Reports, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 386–399, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Blaskovich, J. Sun, A. Cantor, J. Turkson, R. Jove, and S. M. Sebti, “Discovery of JSI-124 (cucurbitacin I), a selective janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling pathway inhibitor with potent antitumor activity against human and murine cancer cells in mice,” Cancer Research, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1270–1279, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Clericuzio, M. Mella, P. Vita-Finzi, M. Zema, and G. Vidari, “Cucurbitane triterpenoids from Leucopaxillus gentianeus,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 1823–1828, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Garg, S. C. Kaul, and R. Wadhwa, “Anti-stress and glial differentiation effects of a novel combination of Cucurbitacin B and Withanone (CucWi-N): experimental evidence,” Annals of Neurosciences, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 201–209, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Wakimoto, D. Yin, J. O'Kelly et al., “Cucurbitacin B has a potent antiproliferative effect on breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo,” Cancer Science, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 1793–1797, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Garg, S. C. Kaul, and R. Wadhwa, “Cucurbitacin B and cancer intervention: chemistry, biology and mechanisms (review),” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 19–37, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Therapeutic Goods Association, “Health Safety Regulation-Substances that may be used in listed medicines in Australia,” Government of Australia, p. 86, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Promkan, S. Dakeng, S. Chakrabarty, O. Bogler, and P. Patmasiriwat, “The effectiveness of cucurbitacin B in BRCA1 defective breast cancer cells,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 2, p. e55732, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Liang, X. L. Zhang, J. W. Yuan et al., “Cucurbitacin B inhibits the migration and invasion of breast cancer cells by altering the biomechanical properties of cells,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 618–630, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Garg, H. Huifu, A. Kumari, D. Sundar, S. C. Kaul, and R. Wadhwa, “Induction of senescence in cancer cells by a novel combination of Cucurbitacin B and Withanone: molecular mechanism and therapeutic potential,” The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 1031–1041, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. M. Piao, F. Gao, J. X. Zhu et al., “Cucurbitacin B inhibits tumor angiogenesis by triggering the mitochondrial signaling pathway in endothelial cells,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 1018–1025, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Q. Jin, J. Hao, X. Yang et al., “Higenamine enhances the antitumor effects of cucurbitacin B in breast cancer by inhibiting the interaction of AKT and CDK2,” Oncology Reports, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 2127–2136, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Duangmano, P. Sae-lim, A. Suksamrarn, F. E. Domann, and P. Patmasiriwat, “Cucurbitacin B inhibits human breast cancer cell proliferation through disruption of microtubule polymerization and nucleophosmin/B23 translocation,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 185, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Gao, M. S. Islam, J. Tian, V. W. Y. Lui, and D. Xiao, “Inactivation of ATP citrate lyase by Cucurbitacin B: a bioactive compound from cucumber, inhibits prostate cancer growth,” Cancer Letters, vol. 349, no. 1, pp. 15–25, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Lu, B. Yu, and J. Xu, “Cucurbitacin B regulates immature myeloid cell differentiation and enhances antitumor immunity in patients with lung cancer,” Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 495–503, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Qu, P. Cong, C. Lin, Y. Deng, J. Li-Ling, and M. Zhang, “Inhibition of paclitaxel resistance and apoptosis induction by cucurbitacin B in ovarian carcinoma cells,” Oncology Letters, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 145–152, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. T. Chan, F. Y. Meng, Q. Li et al., “Cucurbitacin B induces apoptosis and S phase cell cycle arrest in BEL-7402 human hepatocellular carcinoma cells and is effective via oral administration,” Cancer Letters, vol. 294, no. 1, pp. 118–124, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. H. Thoennissen, G. B. Iwanski, N. B. Doan et al., “Cucurbitacin B induces apoptosis by inhibition of theJAK/STATPathway and potentiates antiproliferative effects of gemcitabine on pancreatic cancer cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 69, no. 14, pp. 5876–5884, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Liu, H. Peng, M. Zhang, Y. Deng, and Z. Wu, “Cucurbitacin B, a small molecule inhibitor of the Stat3 signaling pathway, enhances the chemosensitivity of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma cells to cisplatin,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 641, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. Henrich, C. L. Thomas, A. D. Brooks et al., “Effects of cucurbitacins on cell morphology are associated with sensitization of renal carcinoma cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis,” Apoptosis, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 79–89, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Zhang, Y. Li, K. A. Park et al., “Cucurbitacin induces autophagy through mitochondrial ROS production which counteracts to limit caspase-dependent apoptosis,” Autophagy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 559–576, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Jing and D. J. Tweardy, “Targeting Stat3 in cancer therapy,” Anti-Cancer Drugs, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 601–607, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Sun, M. A. Blaskovich, R. Jove, S. K. Livingston, D. Coppola, and S. M. Sebti, “Cucurbitacin Q: a selective STAT3 activation inhibitor with potent antitumor activity,” Oncogene, vol. 24, no. 20, pp. 3236–3245, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Cai, X. Fang, C. He et al., “Cucurbitacins: a systematic review of the phytochemistry and anticancer activity,” The American Journal of Chinese Medicine, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1331–1350, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. T. Chan, K. Li, S. L. Liu, K. H. Chu, M. Toh, and W. D. Xie, “Cucurbitacin B inhibits STAT3 and the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in leukemia cell line K562,” Cancer Letters, vol. 289, no. 1, pp. 46–52, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. T. Silva, F. C. Geller, L. Persich et al., “Cytotoxic effects of natural and semisynthetic cucurbitacins on lung cancer cell line A549,” Investigational New Drugs, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 139–148, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zheng, Y. Liu, W. Liu et al., “Cucurbitacin B inhibits growth and induces apoptosis through the JAK2/STAT3 and MAPK pathways in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 89–94, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. R. Zhang, M. X. Gao, and K. Yang, “Cucurbitacin B inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in human osteosarcoma cells via modulation of the JAK2/STAT3 and MAPK pathways,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 805–812, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Ning Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

624

Downloads

753

Citations