|
Bacteria | Evaluation method | RGO concentrations (μg/mL) | Effects |
|
E. coli [10] | Cell viability | 40 | Growth inhibition |
|
Pseudomonas aeruginosa [24] | Growth profile Cell viability ROS generation DNA fragmentation | 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200 | Growth inhibition |
|
E. coli Staphylococcus aureus [9] | Cell viability RNA concentration | Growth monitored on RGO surface | Growth inhibition |
|
E. coli [23] | Cell viability ROS generation DNA fragmentation | 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150 | Growth inhibition |
|
E. coli [8] | Cell viability ATP assay | 85 | Growth inhibition |
|
S. aureus P. aeruginosa [25] | Growth curve Nucleic acid leakage ROS generation SEM images | 1000, 2000, 3000 | Growth inhibition |
|
E. coli [12] | Cell viability ROS generation | 40 | Growth inhibition |
|
E. coli S. aureus [26] | Growth curve Biofilm quantification ROS generation | 0.5, 5, 10, 50, 100, 250, 500 | Growth and biofilm inhibition |
|
Soil bacterial community [27] | Bacterial 16S rRNA gene Analysis | 0.001, 1, 1000 μg Per kg soil | Altered bacterial community composition in comparison to the no-treatment control Alpha diversity, depicting the number of taxonomic groups in a microbial community, was not altered |
|
E. coli [28] | Cell viability | 1000 μg/mL | No growth inhibition |
|
Bacillus subtilis P. aeruginosa [29] | RGO integrated in solid agar | 0.01–0.08% | Growth inhibition |
|
B. subtilis E. coli [30] | Agar well diffusion | 100, 400, 800 μg/mL | Growth inhibition |
|
E. coli S. aureus [31] | Agar well diffusion | 10000 μg/well | Growth inhibition |
|