Research Article

Antibacterial Activity of Reduced Graphene Oxide

Table 1

Literature summary of RGO effects on different bacterial species.

BacteriaEvaluation methodRGO concentrations (μg/mL)Effects

E. coli [10]Cell viability40Growth inhibition

Pseudomonas aeruginosa [24]Growth profile
Cell viability
ROS generation
DNA fragmentation
25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150,
175, 200
Growth inhibition

E. coli
Staphylococcus aureus [9]
Cell viability
RNA concentration
Growth monitored on RGO surfaceGrowth inhibition

E. coli [23]Cell viability
ROS generation
DNA fragmentation
25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150Growth inhibition

E. coli [8]Cell viability
ATP assay
85Growth inhibition

S. aureus
P. aeruginosa [25]
Growth curve
Nucleic acid leakage
ROS generation
SEM images
1000, 2000, 3000Growth inhibition

E. coli [12]Cell viability
ROS generation
40Growth inhibition

E. coli
S. aureus [26]
Growth curve
Biofilm quantification
ROS generation
0.5, 5, 10, 50, 100, 250, 500Growth and biofilm inhibition

Soil bacterial community [27]Bacterial 16S rRNA gene
Analysis
0.001, 1, 1000 μg
Per kg soil
Altered bacterial community composition in comparison to the no-treatment control
Alpha diversity, depicting the number of taxonomic groups in a microbial community, was not altered

E. coli [28]Cell viability1000 μg/mLNo growth inhibition

Bacillus subtilis
P. aeruginosa [29]
RGO integrated in solid agar0.01–0.08%Growth inhibition

B. subtilis
E. coli [30]
Agar well diffusion100, 400, 800 μg/mLGrowth inhibition

E. coli
S. aureus [31]
Agar well diffusion10000 μg/wellGrowth inhibition