Research Article

Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Adolescents: Association with Socioeconomic Status and Exposure to Supermarkets and Fast Food Outlets

Table 3

Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for infrequent vegetable consumption, separate analyses for students in low, middle, and high family social classes.

Low family social class, 𝑛 = 1 1 4 1 OR (95% CI)Middle family social class, 𝑛 = 2 4 7 8 OR (95% CI)High family social class, 𝑛 = 1 3 8 4 OR (95% CI)

Sexa
 Boys versus girls1.37 (1.06–1.78)*1.49 (1.26–1.76)***1.53 (1.23–1.90)***

Gradea
 7th versus 5th 1.51 (1.12–2.03)**1.15 (0.94–1.40)1.14 (0.88–1.45)
 9th versus 5th 1.59 (1.14–2.21)**1.01 (0.82–1.24)1.18 (0.88–1.45)

Supermarket exposurea
 low versus high1.33 (0.92–1.90)1.19 (0.92–1.54)1.04 (0.80–1.35)

Fast food outlet exposurea
 high versus low1.17 (0.80–1.71)1.20 (0.92–1.57)1.26 (0.95–1.66)

Interaction supermarket * fast food exposureb
 (i) high, low1.01.01.0
 (ii) low, high1.79 (0.99–3.21)1.14 (0.76–1.73)1.27 (0.84–1.92)
 (iii) low, low1.11 (0.71–1.74)1.05 (0.71–1.74)0.95 (0.69–1.30)
 (iv) high, high0.87 (0.50–1.53)0.91 (0.58–1.42)0.94 (0.62–1.43)

a Odds ratios mutually adjusted for sex, grade, and supermarket and fast food outlet exposure.
bAdjusted for sex and grade.
Significant levels at *0.05, **0.01, ***0.001.