Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Adolescents: Association with Socioeconomic Status and Exposure to Supermarkets and Fast Food Outlets
Table 3
Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for infrequent vegetable consumption, separate analyses for students in low, middle, and high family social classes.
Low family social class, OR (95% CI)
Middle family social class, OR (95% CI)
High family social class, OR (95% CI)
Sexa
Boys versus girls
1.37 (1.06–1.78)*
1.49 (1.26–1.76)***
1.53 (1.23–1.90)***
Gradea
7th versus 5th
1.51 (1.12–2.03)**
1.15 (0.94–1.40)
1.14 (0.88–1.45)
9th versus 5th
1.59 (1.14–2.21)**
1.01 (0.82–1.24)
1.18 (0.88–1.45)
Supermarket exposurea
low versus high
1.33 (0.92–1.90)
1.19 (0.92–1.54)
1.04 (0.80–1.35)
Fast food outlet exposurea
high versus low
1.17 (0.80–1.71)
1.20 (0.92–1.57)
1.26 (0.95–1.66)
Interaction supermarket * fast food exposureb
(i) high, low
1.0
1.0
1.0
(ii) low, high
1.79 (0.99–3.21)
1.14 (0.76–1.73)
1.27 (0.84–1.92)
(iii) low, low
1.11 (0.71–1.74)
1.05 (0.71–1.74)
0.95 (0.69–1.30)
(iv) high, high
0.87 (0.50–1.53)
0.91 (0.58–1.42)
0.94 (0.62–1.43)
Odds ratios mutually adjusted for sex, grade, and supermarket and fast food outlet exposure.
bAdjusted for sex and grade. Significant levels at *0.05, **0.01, ***0.001.