Research Article
Body Composition and Basal Metabolic Rate in Women with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Table 3
Comparison between the estimated and measured BMR in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
| | Variable | Mean | (95% CI) | |
| | Measured BMR (kcal in 24 h) | 1411.9 | (1300.2; 1523.2) | | | Estimated BMR (kcal in 24 h) | | | | | Harris and Benedict [10] | 1453.9 | (1397.8; 1511.1) | | | Difference
(1)
(kcal in 24 h) | 42.3 | (−36.1; 120.6) | 0.278 | | Deviation %
(2)
| 5.9 | (−0.7; 12.6) | | | FAO/WHO/UNU [11] | 1511.5 | (1463.5; 1559.4) | | | Difference
(1)
(kcal in 24 h) | 99.8 | (16.5; 183.1) | 0.021* | | Deviation %
(2)
| 10.6 | (2.9; 18.2) | | | Owen et al. [19] | 1358.2 | (1318.6; 1397.8) | | | Difference
(1)
(kcal in 24 h) | −53.5 | (−140.5; 33.5) | 0.218 | | Deviation %
(2)
| −0.5 | (−7.5; 6.5) | | | Mifflin et al. [20] | 1342.1 | (1276.7; 1407.4) | | | Difference
(1)
(kcal in 24 h) | −69.6 | (−146.6; 7.4) | 0.075 | | Deviation %
(2)
| −2.6 | (−8.4; 3.2) | | | Gougeon et al. [23] | 1419.1 | (1339.1; 1499.0) | | | Difference
(1)
(kcal in 24 h) | 7.4 | (−69.2; 83.9) | 0.845 | | Deviation %
(2)
| 2.8 | (−3.7; 9.3) | | | Huang et al. [6] | 1526.7 | (1466.0; 1587.1) | | | Difference
(1)
(kcal in 24 h) | 115.0 | (36.9; 193.1) | 0.005* | | Deviation %
(2)
| 11.3 | (4.2; 18.4) | | | Rodrigues et al. [18] | 1394.0 | (1336.3; 1451.8) | | | Difference
(1)
(kcal in 24 h) | −17.6 | (−96.4; 61.1) | 0.649 | | Deviation %
(2)
| 1.5 | (−4.9; 8.0) | |
|
|
Paired Student’s -test: . BMR: basal metabolic rate; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
(1)
(Estimated − measured) (kcal in 24 h).
(2)
(Difference/measured) × 100 (%).
|
