Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism

Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 5550222 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5550222

Rocco Capuano, Federica Marchese, Raffaella Sica, Eduardo Capuano, Marzia Manilia, Anna Grazia Iannone, Alessandro D’Ambrosio, Alvino Bisecco, Gioacchino Tedeschi, Antonio Gallo, Vincenzo Capuano, "Epidemiologic Data of Vitamin D Deficiency and Its Implication in Cardio-Cerebrovascular Risk in a Southern Italian Population", Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, vol. 2021, Article ID 5550222, 8 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5550222

Epidemiologic Data of Vitamin D Deficiency and Its Implication in Cardio-Cerebrovascular Risk in a Southern Italian Population

Academic Editor: Roxana Valdés-Ramos
Received07 Jan 2021
Revised13 Apr 2021
Accepted26 May 2021
Published08 Jun 2021

Abstract

Background. Vitamin D (25(OH)D) deficiency is a prevalent condition worldwide. However, the highest prevalence rates of 25(OH)D deficiency have been attributed to regions with higher latitude. A close association between 25(OH)D and cardio-cerebrovascular (CCV) risk factors and major health problems has been identified. Aim. To establish the prevalence of 25(OH)D deficiency and to investigate the relationship between 25(OH)D levels and CCV risk factors (blood cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose concentrations, body mass index, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure) in a cohort representative of Southern Italy. Methods. The prevalence of 25(OH)D levels was evaluated in 1200 subjects aged 25–74 years (600 males and 600 females), enrolled in the “VIP” (from Italian for Irno Valley Prevention) Project, whereas multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between 25(OH)D levels and CCV risk factors. Results. Only 13.3% of females and 11.1% of males showed adequate serum concentrations of 25(OH)D (≥30 ng/ml), while 59.3% of females and 55.1% of males showed 25(OH)D deficient levels (<20 ng/ml). We observed an independent association between 25(OH)D concentrations and metabolic syndrome score, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and corrected QT (cQT). Conclusions. We report a high prevalence of 25(OH)D deficiency across the largest Italian adult population studied so far and, in particular, the first across Southern Italy; furthermore, we provide data on the association between 25(OH)D deficiency and higher CCV risk factors.

1. Introduction

Vitamin D plays an essential role in calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism, preventing rickets and osteomalacia [15]. Vitamin D is metabolized first to 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and then to the hormonal form 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D). Moved by the ubiquitous expression of 1,25(OH)2D receptors, the active form of vitamin D, researchers investigated the potential extraskeletal actions of vitamin D, discovering its determinant role in the autoimmune, cardiovascular, and neurological systems [613]. Furthermore, epidemiological studies revealed the association between low 25(OH)D serum concentrations, the surrogate marker for vitamin D nutritional status, and chronic diseases related to oxidative stress, inflammation, and aging, such as diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular (hypertension, heart attack) and neurological (stroke, multiple sclerosis, and Alzheimer’s disease) diseases [14]. As a matter of fact, research conducted on the relationship between 25(OH)D and cardiovascular events [1527] and cerebrovascular accidents [28, 29] highlighted the association between low serum 25(OH)D concentrations and cardio-cerebrovascular (CCV) risk factors.

Adequate serum concentrations of 25(OH)D range from 30 to 100 ng/ml, while those lower than 20 ng/ml are diagnostic of vitamin D deficiency. The said condition is typically caused by inadequate cutaneous synthesis, which is, in turn, strictly related to scarce exposure to sunlight [30, 31]. To date, vitamin D deficiency is a prevalent health problem, among all ethnicities and age groups [3235], which, hence, makes epidemiological studies essential to investigate the role of vitamin D in preventive and therapeutic strategies.

As far as Southern Italy is concerned, no epidemiological studies investigating vitamin D deficiency have been conducted among its population, although their 25(OH)D levels may be higher than those recorded in studies carried out in Northern Europe [14], due to lower latitude.

According to this background, we considered it of interest to evaluate the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its relationship with traditional CCV risk factors (blood cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose concentrations, body mass index, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure), in a representative Southern Italian cohort.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design and Study Population

Data presented in this study are included in the 2018–2019 cross-sectional phase of the Irno Valley Prevention Project (VIP) [36], a randomized epidemiological and primary prevention study. Between January 2018 and July 2019, 1200 adults (aged 25–74 years), 600 males and 600 females, representative of the Irno Valley (Campania region), an area of Southern Italy, were randomly included from the electoral lists of two municipalities (Mercato S. Severino and Baronissi), following the rules of the Monica Project–MONICA Cardiovascular Diseases [37]. Three age and gender-matched lists of 120 subjects each were compiled. Firstly, an invitation letter was sent to the subjects in the first list. Then, in case of refusal, subjects were replaced with others from the second list and, in case of another refusal, with similar ones from the third list. The type of enrolment used allowed us to build the sample as initially planned: 120 males and 120 females per decade.

The local ethics committee approved the study, and participants provided their informed consent.

2.2. Data Collection and Measurement

All patients underwent a physician-administered medical history, clinical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG), and psychological assessment. Vascular risk factors and serum 25(OH)D were also measured. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from height (in meters, using a wall altimeter) and weight (in kilograms, using a floor balance, SlimtronicRowenta®), with subjects wearing light clothes. Two consecutive measurements of blood pressure at a 5-minute interval in the sitting position were performed according to the criteria of the World Health Organization [38] and the mean used in the study. Expired carbon oxide using the Micro Smokerlyzer (Bedfont Scientific Ltd, Rochester, UK) was used to assess the exposure to cigarette smoke. Levels of anxiety and depression were evaluated using the Italian version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Italian version of the Beck Depression Inventory—II Edition.

2.3. Laboratory Assays

Blood samples were obtained, after an overnight fast, from the antecubital vein without venous congestion. The enzymatic method was adopted to determine total and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, uric acid, C-reactive protein (CRP), and glycemia. LDL cholesterol was calculated with the Friedewald equation. Serum insulin was measured by a chemiluminescent method using Beckman Coulter Diagnostics DxI 800 analyzer (interassay CV < 6%).

Creatinine was measured using the kinetics-plugged method (500 nm) on Cobas-ABX automatic line, while C3 was measured by the nephelometric method on QM 300 method. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique (Immunoassay System Beckman Coulter). The vitamin D nutritional status was defined according to the Endocrine Society Guidelines: (1) adequate ≥30 ng/ml, (2) insufficient ≥20 and <30 ng/ml, (3) deficient ≥10 and <20 ng/ml, and (4) severely deficient <10 ng/ml [30, 31].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

A Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to verify the normal distribution of demographic, clinical, and conventional MRI variables. The population was divided into 3 tertiles 25(OH)D:Group 1: 400 subjects with 25(OH)D < 15.1 ng/mlGroup 2: 400 subjects with 25(OH)D within ≥15.1 and < 22.4 ng/mlGroup 3: 400 subjects with 25(OH)D ≥ 22.4 ng/ml)

Across the three tertiles, we evaluated the differences in the following variables: age, height, weight, BMI, continuous metabolic syndrome score (calculated with both National Cholesterol Educational Program (NCEP) and International Diabetes Federation (IDF) methods [39]), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, HDL and LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, glycemia, serum insulin, creatinine, C3, CRP, hemoglobin, white blood cells, carbon oxide, heart rate (HR), QRS, PR, QT, correct QT (cQT), depression, and anxiety. To compare quantitative variables among the 3 tertiles, we used one-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test. Chi-square analysis was used to test differences in prevalence. Moreover, to investigate independent associations between 25(OH)D and CCV risk factors, we carried out a multiple linear regression analysis (stepwise model), with 25(OH)D as the dependent variable adjusting for age. Lastly, we applied a sensitivity analysis, excluding subjects taking oral 25(OH)D supplements. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 20. Absolute numbers and percentages were used to describe categorical variables; means and standard deviations (SD) were used for normally distributed continuous variables.

3. Results

3.1. Prevalence of 25(OH)D Levels across Population

Baseline characteristics of study participants are reported in Table 1. Sixteen subjects (13 females and 3 males) reported taking vitamin D supplements.


VariablesAllMalesFemales
N =1200N =600N =600

25(OH)D mean ± SD (ng/ml)19.8 ± 9.320 ± 8.519.6 ± 9.6
Weight (kg)75.7 ± 15.781.9 ± 14.369.4 ± 14.4
Height (meters)1.64 ± 0.11.71 ± 0.11.57 ± 0.1
Body mass index (kg/m2)28.1 ± 5.328.1 ± 4.628.1 ± 5.9
Metabolic syndrome–NCEP (%)28.831.725.8
Metabolic syndrome–IDF (%)40.846.834.8
HDL (mg/dl)53.8 ± 12.748.8 ± 1158.7 ± 12.3
LDL (mg/dl)123.9 ± 34.8124.5 ± 35.7123.2 ± 34
Non-HDL (mg/dl)148.5 ± 38.8152.1 ± 38.7144.8 ± 38.7
Triglycerides (mg/dl)123 ± 77.7138 ± 92.4108.1 ± 55.8
Glycemia101.9 ± 27.6105.2 ± 29.898.5 ± 24.7
Serum uric acid (mg/dl)5.3 ± 1.56 ± 1.34.6 ± 1.2
Serum insulin (mg/dl)9.2 ± 14.19 ± 10.79.5 ± 16.8
Creatinine (mg/dl)1 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.20.91 ± 0.1
C3 (mg/dl)127.4 ± 21.1127.4 ± 19.1127.4 ± 23
C-reactive protein (mg/L)0.3 ± 0.60.3 ± 0.70.3 ± 0.4
Hemoglobin (g/dl)14.1 ± 1.415 ± 1.113.3 ± 1.2
White blood cells (103/µL)6.4 ± 1.66.6 ± 1.56.2 ± 1.7
Smokers29.1%31.2%27%
Carbon oxide (parts per million)3.8 ± 6.24.2 ± 6.63.3 ± 5.8
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)137.2 ± 20.9143.1 ± 19131.4 ± 20
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)77.3 ± 10.979.6 ± 10.774.9 ± 10.5
Depression score7.8 ± 7.66.3 ± 6.49.2 ± 8.4
Anxiety score37.8 ± 10.435.5 ± 9.540 ± 10.7
Heart rate (beats/minute)66.4 ± 10.265.4 ± 10.367.5 ± 10
QRS (milliseconds)90.8 ± 13.195.2 ± 13.486.4 ± 11.2
PR (milliseconds)152.4 ± 30.5157.7 ± 35.8147.1 ± 23.1
QT (milliseconds)403 ± 29.8401.1 ± 31.7404.8 ± 27.8
cQT (milliseconds)419.3 ± 27.3413.1 ± 30.4425.5 ± 22.3

Percentages were used to describe categorical variables; means and standard deviations were used for continuous variables. 25(OH)D: vitamin D; SD: standard deviation; NCEP: National Cholesterol Education Program; IDF: International Diabetes Federation; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein.

Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were 19.6 ± 9.6 ng/ml in females and 20 ± 8.5 ng/ml in males (NS). No statistical difference of 25(OH)D levels was observed across different decades of age (Table 2). As reported in Table 3, only 13.3% of females and 11.1% of males had adequate concentrations of 25(OH)D (≥30 ng/ml), compared to 59.3% of females and 55.1% of males who had 25(OH)D deficient (<20 ng/ml) and severe deficient (<10 ng/ml) levels.


AgeNFemalesNMales value

25–3412020.6 ± 8.112019.2 ± 7.9NS
35–4412020.3 ± 9.312022.2 ± 7.8NS
45–5412018.6 ± 9.112020.1 ± 7.7NS
55–6412019.2 ± 9.512020 ± 10NS
65–7412019.5 ± 11.512018.7 ± 8.4NS
Total60019.6 ± 9.660020 ± 8.5NS

N: number; SD: standard deviation; NS: nonsignificant.

Reference rangeFemales, NPrevalence (%)Males, NPrevalence (%)

Severe deficient: <10 ng/mL8013.3579.5
Deficient: ≥10 < 20 ng/mL2764627345.6
Insufficiency: ≥20 < 30 ng/mL16427.420333.8
Normal: ≥30 ng/mL8013.36711.1

N: number.
3.2. 25(OH)D Levels and CCV Risk Factors

By subdividing patients in tertiles based on the concentration of 25(OH)D (Table 4), subjects of the lowest and highest tertiles showed significant differences in BMI, metabolic syndrome, systolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, glycemia, CRP, C3, and cQT. Furthermore, metabolic syndrome, systolic blood pressure, CRP, and glycemia were statistically different between the lowest and the intermediate tertiles, while metabolic syndrome and non-HDL cholesterol were different between the intermediate and the highest ones.


VariablesI tertileII tertileIII tertilet
N = 400N = 400N = 400I vs. III vs. IIIII vs. III

25(OH)D range (ng/ml)3.7–15.015.1–22.322.4–64.3
 25(OH)D mean ± SD (ng/ml)10.9 ± 2.618.5 ± 2.130.1 ± 7.0
 Age (years)51.5 ± 14.148 ± 14.148.4 ± 13.80.0012.62.41.8
 Males (%)46.6%49.552.6NS

Anthropometric variables
 Weight (kg)75.7 ± 1776.4 ± 15.874.6 ± 14.3NS
 Height (meters)1.63 ± 0.11.65 ± 0.11.65 ± 0.1NS
 Body mass index (kg/m2)28.7 ± 6.028.2 ± 5.327.4 ± 4.40.0061.23.22.0
 Metabolic syndrome-NCEP (%)34.531.720.4<0.001
 Metabolic syndrome-IDF (%)44.842.535.30.02

Serum variables
 HDL cholesterol (mg/dl)52.9 ± 12.653.4 ± 12.655.1 ± 12.8NS
 LDL cholesterol(mg/dl)127 ± 35.2125.5 ± 34.4119.8 ± 34.80.020.62.72.1
 Non-HDL cholesterol (mg/dl)152.4 ± 38.7150.5 ± 39142.8 ± 38.20.0030.63.22.6
 Triglycerides (mg/dl)127 ± 82.3126.8 ± 73.9114.8 ± 77.10.042.02.0
 Glycemia106.4 ± 36.2100.2 ± 24.399.3 ± 20.20.0012.93.30.4
 Serum uric acid (mg/dl)5.2 ± 1.55.3 ± 1.55.3 ± 1.4NS
 Serum insulin (mg/dl)9.8 ± 15.310.2 ± 187.9 ± 6.4NS
 Creatinine (mg/dl)1.0 ± 0.21.0 ± 0.21.0 ± 0.2NS
 C3 (mg/dl)128.9 ± 20.9128.7 ± 21.9124.9 ± 20.60.020.12.52.3
 C-reactive protein (mg/L)0.4 ± 0.80.3 ± 0.40.3 ± 0.50.042.22.10.2
 Hemoglobin (g/dl)14.1 ± 1.514.1 ± 1.414.1 ± 1.4NS
 White blood cells (103/µ/L)6.5 ± 1.76.5 ± 1.66.3 ± 1.5NS

Others CCV risk factors
 Carbon oxide (parts per million)4.4 ± 7.23.6 ± 5.93.4 ± 5.5NS
 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)140.2 ± 21.9135.4 ± 20.9135.7 ± 19.40.0043.02.30.2
 Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)78.3 ± 11.376.7 ± 10.876.8 ± 10.3NS

Psychological variables
 Depression score8.3 ± 7.97.6 ± 87.7 ± 6.9NS
 Anxiety score38.5 ± 11.237.2 ± 937.8 ± 9.9NS

ECG variables
 Heart rate (beats/minute)67.3 ± 11.266.2 ± 9.466 ± 9.6NS
 QRS (milliseconds)91 ± 15.290.3 ± 11.890.9 ± 12NS
 PR (milliseconds)151.1 ± 24152.7 ± 30.4152.7 ± 25.1NS
 QT (milliseconds)402.7 ± 30.2403.5 ± 27.7402.1 ± 31.3NS
 cQT (milliseconds)421.6 ± 30.3419.8 ± 22416.5 ± 28.60.031.82.51.8

Absolute numbers {range (min–max)} and percentage were used to describe categorical variables; means and standard deviations (SD) were used for continuous variables. Statistical significance was accepted for values of ; NS: nonsignificant; t: t-value (Bonferroni test). Significant difference () at Bonferroni test. 25(OH)D: vitamin D; NCEP: National Cholesterol Education Program; IDF: International Diabetes Federation.

Results of the multiple linear regression analysis are shown in Table 5. When multiple regression analysis included all CCV risk factors (BMI, metabolic syndrome score, systolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, glycemia, CRP, C3, and cQT), an independent association between 25(OH)D and NCEP metabolic syndrome score, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and cQT was found (Table 5). In order to better understand if the burden of each variable of the metabolic syndrome score could have an independent association with 25(OH)D, we repeated the multivariate model without metabolic syndrome score and we observed a significant independent association with BMI, HDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, glycemia, and cQT (Table 6). The sensitivity analysis, carried out excluding subjects taking oral vitamin D supplements, did not modify the results obtained with the whole cohort.


VariableBeta

Metabolic syndrome score-NCEP−0.0920.005
QTc−0.0070.002
LDL cholesterol (mg/dl)−0.0940.001
HDL (mg/dl)0.0830.012

Statistical significance was accepted for values of .

VariableBeta

BMI−0.0720.021
QTC−0.0660.026
Non-HDL cholesterol (mg/dl)−0.0940.001
HDL (mg/dl)0.0810.08
Glycemia (mg/dl)−0.0630.038

Statistical significance was accepted for values of .

4. Discussion

In this study, we first reported epidemiological data of serum 25(OH)D levels from the largest adult Italian population studied so far and across Southern Italy. Surprisingly, and confuting our initial hypothesis, we found a large prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among our population sample. In fact, despite the low latitude, according to studies conducted in the Northern Europe and North America [40, 41], 57.2% of our cohort showed 25(OH)D values lower than 20 ng/ml, while only 12.2% showed values between 30 and 100 ng/ml, considering the normal range by national and international guidelines [30, 31]. No significant dissimilarity of 25(OH)D levels was found between different decade groups and gender (19.6 ± 9.6 ng/ml in females and 20 ± 8.5 ng/ml in males).

These results are probably due to less sunlight exposure, independently of age and sex, mainly for social reasons and for skin cancer prevention [14], highlighting that actual sunlight exposure affects serum 25(OH)D levels more than simple latitude. Considering that vitamin D deficiency has been increasingly demonstrated to be an independent CCV risk factor, we investigated its relationship with major CCV risk factors using tertile-based categories.

Patients in the highest tertile (25(OH)D levels >22,4 ng/ml) had lower CCV risk, compared to those in the intermediate or lowest tertile, due to significantly better profiles of BMI, systolic blood pressure, metabolic syndrome, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, glycemia, cQT, CRP, and C3. Furthermore, we found an independent association between 25(OH)D and each of the following variables: NCEP metabolic syndrome score, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and cQT. Furthermore, removing metabolic syndrome score from the regression model, also BMI and glycemia were observed as independent predictors.

The inverse relationship between 25(OH)D and BMI has been established in various studies and, especially, in a study involving 42024 participants from 21 cohorts [14]; subsequently, it was also confirmed in cohorts of children and adolescents [42, 43] and in numerous ethnic groups [44]. A possible explanation of this finding could be the fact that obese individuals get insufficient sun exposure, perform less outdoor activities [42], and present lower 1,25(OH)2D receptor expression in adipose tissue [43]. Having this in mind, we can speculate that population-level interventions to reduce BMI are expected to decrease the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency; therefore, studies focused on this specific aim could be an interesting research topic. Secondly, the inverse and independent association found between 25(OH)D and glycemia is also relevant; in fact, this finding adds evidence to previous studies that showed better glycemic conditions in subjects with higher 25(OH)D levels [44, 45]. This association is particularly interesting considering that vitamin D supplementation seems to reduce type 1 diabetes mellitus incidence in childhood [46, 47] and to prevent the development and severity of peripheral neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [48, 49]. These data do not support a direct cause-and-effect relationship, and indeed a recent prospective analysis provided results on the noncausal association between vitamin D and risk of type-2 diabetes, taking into account genetics as well [50]. Further studies are thus warranted.

Regarding the relationship between 25(OH)D and lipid profile, we found an inverse association between 25(OH)D levels and LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and a direct association between 25(OH)D and HDL [5154], confirming previous studies. Various mechanisms have been suggested to explain the relation between 25(OH)D and lipid metabolism: (i) vitamin D and its metabolites play a role in cholesterol synthesis inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA-reductase and lanosterol 14a-demethylase enzyme activity in cultured cells [55]; (ii) lower LDL-C concentrations have been observed in people with higher sunlight exposure, although it is not known whether the exposure to sunlight affects cholesterol metabolism indirectly, by improving the status of vitamin D, or directly; (iii) vitamin D is essential to maintain the necessary levels of apolipoprotein A-1, the main component of HDL [56].

Finally, it is interesting to examine the indirect association between cQT and 25(OH)D levels found in our sample. In fact, very little is known about the relationship between cQT and 25(OH)D with contrasting results. Nalbant et al. demonstrated that there is no difference in cQT between people with normal levels of 25(OH)D and those with low levels of 25(OH)D [57]; on the other hand, prolonged cQT duration and cQT dispersion have been observed in patients with vitamin D deficiency [5759].

However, our study is not without limitations: (i) the cohort studied was selected from two small municipalities in Southern Italy and could not be representative of the whole population in Italy and Southern Italy; (ii) we conducted the study in a time span of 18 months (January 2018-July 2019), with a possible impact of seasonal variations of vitamin D; (iii) due to the cross-sectional nature of the study, reverse causation could not be excluded.

In conclusion, we found a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency across the largest Italian population studied so far; furthermore, we provided data of an association between vitamin D deficiency and higher CCV risk factors. These results provide evidence to better select the correct targeting population subgroups that may benefit from vitamin D supplementation. In fact, since now, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown ambiguous results about the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in reducing major CCV events [6063]; this may partly be explained by taking into account the fact that heterogeneous samples were selected or that different 25(OH)D doses and analogs were used [64].

Abbreviations

25(OH)D:Vitamin D
CCV:Cardio-cerebrovascular
ECG:Electrocardiogram
BMI:Body mass index
NCEP:National cholesterol educational program
IDF:International Diabetes Federation
CRP:C-reactive protein
cQT:Correct QT.

Data Availability

The data are stored in an internal archive, and most of the data have been shared with the NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) group.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. S. Christakos, P. Dhawan, A. Verstuyf, L. Verlinden, and G. Carmeliet, “Vitamin D: metabolism, molecular mechanism of action, and pleiotropic effects,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 96, pp. 365–408, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. T. O. Carpenter, N. J. Shaw, A. A. Portale, L. M. Ward, S. A. Abrams, and J. M. Pettifor, “Rickets,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers, vol. 3, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Uday, N. Fratzl-Zelman, P. Roschger et al., “Cardiac, bone and growth plate manifestations in hypocalcemic infants: revealing the hidden body of the vitamin D deficiency iceberg,” BMC Pediatrics, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 183, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Uday and W. Högler, “Nutritional rickets and osteomalacia in the twenty-first century: revised concepts, public health, and prevention strategies,” Current Osteoporosis Reports, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 293–302, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Aguiar, N. Atapattu, V. Bhatia et al., “Global consensus recommendations on prevention and management of nutritional rickets,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 101, pp. 394–415, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. R. Bouillon, G. Carmeliet, L. Verlinden et al., “Vitamin D and human health: lessons from vitamin D receptor null mice,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 726–776, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. J. Rosen, J. S. Adams, D. D. Bikle et al., “The nonskeletal effects of vitamin D: an endocrine society scientific statement,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 456–492, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Pilz, N. Verheyen, M. R. Grübler, A. Tomaschitz, and W. März, “Vitamin D and cardiovascular disease prevention,” Nature Reviews Cardiology, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 404–417, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Trummer, S. Pilz, V. Schwetz, B. Obermayer-Pietsch, and E. Lerchbaum, “Vitamin D, PCOS and androgens in men: a systematic review,” Endocrine Connections, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. R95–R113, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. G. Muscogiuri, B. Altieri, C. Annweiler et al., “Vitamin D and chronic diseases: the current state of the art,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 97–107, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Zittermann, S. Pilz, H. Hoffmann, and W. März, “Vitamin D and airway infections: a European perspective,” European Journal of Medical Research, vol. 21, p. 14, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. L. Wagner and B. W. Hollis, “The implications of vitamin D status during pregnancy on mother and her developing child,” Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 9, p. 500, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. T. Keane, H. Elangovan, R. A. Stokes, and J. E. Gunton, “Vitamin D and the liver—correlation or cause?” Nutrients, vol. 10, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. Alfredsson, B. K. Armstrong, D. A. Butterfield et al., “Insufficient sun exposure has become a real public health problem,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, pp. 1–15, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Burgaz, N. Orsini, S. C. Larsson, and A. Wolk, “Blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and hypertension: a meta-analysis,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 636–645, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. K. Syal, A. Kapoor, E. Bhatia et al., “Vitamin D deficiency, coronary artery disease, and endothelial dysfunction: observations from a coronary angiographic study in Indian patients,” The Journal of Invasive Cardiology, vol. 24, pp. 385–389, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  17. T. J. Wang, M. J. Pencina, S. L. Booth et al., “Vitamin D deficiency and risk of cardiovascular disease,” Circulation, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 503–511, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. Duplancic, M. Cesarik, N. K. Poljak et al., “The influence of selective vitamin D receptor activator paricalcitol on cardiovascular system and cardiorenal protection,” Clinical Interventions in Aging, vol. 8, pp. 149–156, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. B. Elamin, N. O. Abu Elnour, K. B. Elamin et al., “Vitamin D and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 96, no. 7, pp. 1931–1942, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. H. Dobnig, S. Pilz, H. Scharnagl et al., “Independent association of low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 168, no. 12, pp. 1340–1349, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. W. R. Chen, Y. A. Qian, Y. D. Chen et al., “The effects of low vitamin D on coronary artery disease,” Heart, Lung and Circulation, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 314–319, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. J. Hsu, Y. Tintut, and L. L. Demer, “Vitamin D and osteogenic differentiation in the artery wall,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1542–1547, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Liberman, A. E. P. Pesaro, L. S. Carmo, and C. V. Serrano Jr, “Calcificação vascular: fisiopatologia e implicações clínicas,” Einstein (São Paulo), vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 376–382, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. De Metrio, V. Milazzo, M. Rubino et al., “Vitamin D plasma levels and in-hospital and 1-year outcomes in acute coronary syndromes,” Medicine (United States), vol. 94, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. L. Ng, J. K. Sandhu, I. B. Squire, J. E. Davies, and D. J. L. Jones, “Vitamin D and prognosis in acute myocardial infarction,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 2341–2346, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Aleksova, R. Belfiore, C. Carriere et al., “Vitamin D deficiency in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an italian single-center study,” International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research, vol. 85, no. 1-2, pp. 23–30, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. I. Gouni-Berthold, W. Krone, and H. Berthold, “Vitamin D and cardiovascular disease,” Current Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 414–422, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. Talebi, A. Amirabadizadeh, S. Nakhaee, Z. Ahmadi, and S. M. Mousavi-Mirzaei, “Cerebrovascular disease: how serum phosphorus, vitamin D, and uric acid levels contribute to the ischemic stroke,” BMC Neurology, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 116, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. B. P. Berghout, L. Fani, A. Heshmatollah et al., “Vitamin D status and risk of stroke,” Stroke, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 2293–2298, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. R. Cesareo, R. Attanasio, M. Caputo et al., “Italian association of clinical endocrinologists (AME) and Italian chapter of the American association of clinical endocrinologists (AACE) position statement: clinical management of vitamin D deficiency in adults,” Nutrients, vol. 10, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. F. Holick, N. C. Binkley, H. A. Bischoff-Ferrari et al., “Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 96, no. 7, pp. 1911–1930, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. a. Alkerwi, N. Sauvageot, G. Gilson, and S. Stranges, “Prevalence and correlates of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in Luxembourg adults: evidence from the observation of cardiovascular risk factors (ORISCAV-LUX) study,” Nutrients, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 6780–6796, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. Vandevijvere, S. Amsalkhir, H. van Oyen, and R. Moreno-Reyes, “High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in pregnant women: a national cross-sectional survey,” PLoS One, vol. 7, Article ID e43868, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. P. Lips, “Vitamin D status and nutrition in Europe and asia,” The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 103, no. 3-5, pp. 620–625, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. C. V. Harinarayan, “Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in postmenopausal south Indian women,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 397–402, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. V. Capuano, T. D’arminio, A. Bambacaro, and C. D. V. Lanzara, “Il Progetto VIP: prevalenza dei fattori di rischio della cardiopatia ischemica in un’area della Campania,” Italian Heart Journal, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 1201–1208, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  37. A. Menotti, S. Giampaoli, A. Verdecchia et al., Il Progetto MONICA (Monitoraggio Malattie Cardiovascolari), Protocollo e Manuale Delle Aree Italiane, Rapporto 1989, Roma: Istituto Superiore di Sanita, 1989, (Rapporti ISTISAN 89/12).
  38. G. A. Rose and H. Blackburn, “Cardiovascular survey methods,” in Monograph Series, pp. 1–188, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1968. View at: Google Scholar
  39. C. Lorenzo, K. Williams, K. J. Hunt, and S. M. Haffner, “The national cholesterol education program-adult treatment panel III, international diabetes federation, and World health organization definitions of the metabolic syndrome as predictors of incident cardiovascular disease and diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 8–13, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. F. Holick, “High prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy and implications for health,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 353–373, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. L. S. Greene-Finestone, C. Berger, C. Berger et al., “25-Hydroxyvitamin D in Canadian adults: biological, environmental, and behavioral correlates,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1389–1399, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Pereira-Santos, P. R. F. Costa, A. M. O. Assis, C. A. S. T. Santos, and D. B. Santos, “Obesity and vitamin D deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Obesity Reviews, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 341–349, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. K. E. Wong, J. Kong, W. Zhang et al., “Targeted expression of human vitamin D receptor in adipocytes decreases energy expenditure and induces obesity in mice,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 39, pp. 33804–33810, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. L. L. Munasinghe, M. F. Mastroeni, S. S. B. S. Mastroeni, S. A. Loehr, J. P. Ekwaru, and P. J. Veugelers, “The association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin d concentrations and elevated glycated hemoglobin values: a longitudinal study of non-diabetic participants of a preventive health program,” Nutrients, vol. 9, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. Deleskog, A. Hilding, K. Brismar, A. Hamsten, S. Efendic, and C.-G. Östenson, “Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level predicts progression to type 2 diabetes in individuals with prediabetes but not with normal glucose tolerance,” Diabetologia, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1668–1678, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. L. C. Stene, J. Ulriksen, P. Magnus, and G. Joner, “Use of cod liver oil during pregnancy associated with lower risk of Type I diabetes in the offspring,” Diabetologia, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1093–1098, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. E. Hyppönen, E. Läärä, A. Reunanen, M.-R. Järvelin, and S. M. Virtanen, “Intake of vitamin D and risk of type 1 diabetes: a birth-cohort study,” The Lancet, vol. 358, no. 9292, pp. 1500–1503, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. B. Zhang, W. Zhao, J. Tu et al., “The relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and a meta-analysis,” Medical (United States), vol. 98, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. U. Alam, A. Fawwad, F. Shaheen, B. Tahir, A. Basit, and R. A. Malik, “Improvement in neuropathy specific quality of life in patients with diabetes after vitamin D supplementation,” Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2017, Article ID 7928083, 7 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. J. S. Zheng, J. Luan, E. Sofianopoulou et al., “The association between circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D metabolites and type 2 diabetes in European populations: a meta-analysis and Mendelian randomisation analysis,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 17, Article ID e1003394, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. A. Yarparvar, I. Elmadfa, A. Djazayery, Z. Abdollahi, and F. Salehi, “The association of vitamin d status with lipid profile and inflammation biomarkers in healthy adolescents,” Nutrients, vol. 12, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. S. N. Saeidlou, D. Vahabzadeh, F. Babaei, and Z. Vahabzadeh, “Seasonal variations of vitamin D and its relation to lipid profile in Iranian children and adults,” Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, vol. 36, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. E. Rashidbeygi, M. H. Rahimi, M. Mollahosseini et al., “Associations of vitamin D status and metabolic dyslipidemia and hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype in apparently healthy adults,” Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 985–990, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. R. Kelishadi, Z. Farajzadegan, and M. Bahreynian, “Association between vitamin D status and lipid profile in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 404–410, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. A. K. Gupta, R. C. Sexton, and H. Rudney’, “Effect of vitamin D3 derivatives on cholesterol synthesis and HMG-CoA reductase activity in cultured cells,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 30, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. W. G. John, K. Noonan, N. Mannan, and B. J. Boucher, “Hypovitaminosis D is associated with reductions in serum apolipoprotein A-I but not with fasting lipids in British Bangladeshis,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 517–522, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. Nalbant, M. B. Vatan, P. Varım, C. Varım, T. Kaya, and A. Tamer, “Does vitamin D deficiency effect heart rate variability in low cardiovascular risk population?” Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 197–200, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. D. O. Yetkin, B. Kucukkaya, M. Turhan, and M. Oren, “The effect of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels on QT interval duration and dispersion in type 2 diabetic patients,” Croatian Medical Journal, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 525–530, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. D. Bagrul and F. Atik, “Association of Vitamin D deficiency with ventricular repolarization abnormalities,” Kardiologia Polska, vol. 77, no. 9, pp. 853–858, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. P. Autier, M. Boniol, C. Pizot, and P. Mullie, “Vitamin D status and ill health: a systematic review,” The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 76–89, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. K. M. Swart, P. Lips, I. A. Brouwer et al., “Effects of vitamin D supplementation on markers for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 1043–1053, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. P. Autier, P. Mullie, A. Macacu et al., “Effect of vitamin D supplementation on non-skeletal disorders: a systematic review of meta-analyses and randomised trials,” The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 986–1004, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. L. Rejnmark, L. S. Bislev, K. D. Cashman et al., “Non-skeletal health effects of Vitamin D supplementation: a systematic review on findings from meta-Analyses summarizing trial data,” PLoS One, vol. 12, Article ID e0180512, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. C. Legarth, D. Grimm, M. Krüger, M. Infanger, and M. Wehland, “Potential beneficial effects of vitamin d in coronary artery disease,” Nutrients, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 99, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Rocco Capuano et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views329
Downloads624
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.